Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4rdrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-05T21:35:43.189Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Conclusion

from Part Two - Popular Protest and Collective Action

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 October 2019

Get access

Summary

Historians of eighteenth-century Ireland have interpreted large-scale violence involving government forces and the general populace in two, contradictory, ways. Broadly speaking, on one side of the debate are historians like Thomas Bartlett, S. J. Connolly, Neal Garnham, James Kelly and M. J. Powell, who have emphasised harmony rather than conflict in social relations, at least until the 1790s. According to S. J. Connolly, Ireland in the early eighteenth century was in many respects a typical pre-industrial society in ancien régime Europe,

ruled over by a mainly landed élite, in which vertical ties of patronage and clientship were more important than horizontal bonds of shared economic or social position, and in which even popular protest was conducted within the assumptions that underlay the existing social order.

Also it was a ‘confessional state’, in which religion was a central aspect of personal and political motivation and in which differences in religious devotion were a fundamental cause of conflict. However, the outlook of the ruling elite with regard to an unreconciled Catholic population and its allies in Europe was ‘a wary confidence in the face of a real, but containable, threat’. This confidence arose in part because the people who joined in localised outbreaks of agrarian violence and urban protest often were controlled and disciplined. According to Neal Garnham, ‘popular protest … tended to be restrained, conservative, even deferential’. Also, the civil authorities deterred people from breaking laws by occasionally handing down harsh punishments in courts such as to hang convicted offenders and display parts of their dismembered bodies in public places. However, they did not practise judicial torture as was commonplace in some other European countries, and there were no ‘forests of corpses’.

Critics of this analysis, who include Vincent Morley, Breandán Ó Buachalla, Éamonn Ó Ciardha and Kevin Whelan, have interpreted violence in late seventeenth- and eighteenth-century Ireland in entirely different ways. Kevin Whelan has argued that Ireland is better understood as a colony of England, as opposed to a representative ancien régime society, in which the descendants of the old proprietors of land, who had ‘mutated into an underground gentry’, waited for the opportunity to reclaim their rightful place at the head of Irish society.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Boydell & Brewer
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Conclusion
  • Timothy D. Watt
  • Book: Popular Protest and Policing in Ascendancy Ireland, 1691-1761
  • Online publication: 12 October 2019
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781787443761.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Conclusion
  • Timothy D. Watt
  • Book: Popular Protest and Policing in Ascendancy Ireland, 1691-1761
  • Online publication: 12 October 2019
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781787443761.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Conclusion
  • Timothy D. Watt
  • Book: Popular Protest and Policing in Ascendancy Ireland, 1691-1761
  • Online publication: 12 October 2019
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781787443761.011
Available formats
×