The receding refugee

In 1951 Hannah Arendt declared that the emerging concept of ‘the refugee’ in international law was the harbinger of a crisis in the polis. ‘Man’, she said, ‘can lose all so-called Rights of Man without losing his essential quality as man, his human dignity. Only the loss of a polity itself expels him from humanity’. She predicted the refugee, as a ‘positive vanguard’, would inaugurate the dissolution of the state–nation–territory trinity. Yet, as Daniel Warner has observed, this triune formation persists ‘in a dysfunctional level’. Arendt's criticism, that the refugee exposes the rights of man as a concept in fundamental crisis, remains pertinent.

However, the terms of this crisis are in fact encoded in the term ‘refugee’ itself. The appropriation of recognition is central to the emergence of a culture of refusal in Western attitudes to asylum. It is acknowledged that, although the definition of the refugee is declaratory rather than constitutive (that is, a person is recognized because s/he is a refugee rather than becoming one because s/he is recognized), de facto power to recognize is discretionary and resides with the state. International law has never made explicit provision for a right to be granted asylum, and it is widely held that the concept of refuge contained within ‘refugee’ has suffered significant erosion as the circumstances to which it is applied have diverged from the context in which it was formed.