Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vsgnj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T22:25:25.028Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 12 - Children's orthopaedics

from Section 4 - Hand and Upper Limb/Children's Orthopaedics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2012

Paul A. Banaszkiewicz
Affiliation:
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Gateshead
Deiary F. Kader
Affiliation:
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Gateshead
Get access

Summary

Introduction

The aims of the FRCS exam are to see if you have enough knowledge to practise as a consultant orthopaedic surgeon safely; not to test you as a paediatric orthopaedic consultant. Hence, the depth of knowledge required is not huge. Nevertheless, a substantial number of candidates fail this section.

This is partly because this section is not well covered by most exam books. Reading paediatric orthopaedic textbooks for the exam is not practical and can be confusing for the inexperienced. Most candidates, particularly those who could not have a paediatric placement, rely on a few good courses to consolidate this area of knowledge.

With this in mind, we used a different approach to cover this section in which we married actual exam questions gathered over the past few years with comprehensive and expanded answers. This keeps the theme of a viva book, provides comprehension of the topics and extra knowledge that may help high fliers to score high marks. Hence, you may find candidate answers with diagrams, X-rays and graphs; these are for your benefit rather than expected answers.

We stuck to the exam principle, where a simple question is asked concerning a clinical picture, X-ray or video clip, followed by increasingly difficult questions to explore the candidate depth and breadth of knowledge. Some of the questions are deliberately difficult and beyond average candidate level, some are easy and the majority are average.

We wish you the best of luck.

Type
Chapter
Information
Postgraduate Orthopaedics
Viva Guide for the FRCS (Tr & Orth) Examination
, pp. 159 - 200
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Loder, RTHensinger, RNAlburger, PDAcute slipped capital femoral epiphysis: the importance of physeal stabilityJ Bone Joint Surg Am 1993 75 1134CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peterson, MDWeiner, DSGreen, NEAcute slipped capital femoral epiphysis: the value and safety of urgent manipulative reductionJ Pediatr Orthop 1997 17 648CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kalogrianitis, STan, CKKemp, GJBass, ABruce, C.Does unstable slipped capital femoral epiphysis require urgent stabilization?J Pediatr Orthop B 2007 16 6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jerre, RBilling, LHansson, GWallin, J.The contralateral hip in patients primarily treated for unilateral slipped upper femoral epiphysis. Long-term follow-up of 61 hipsJ Bone Joint Surg Br 1994 76 563CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Balasa, VVGruppo, RAGlueck, CJLegg–Calve–Perthes disease and thrombophiliaJ Bone Joint Surg Am 2004 86 2642CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thomas, DPMorgan, GTayton, K.Perthes’ disease and the relevance of thrombophiliaJ Bone Joint Surg Br 1999 81 691CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hayek, SKenet, GLubetsky, ADoes thrombophilia play an aetiological role in Legg-Calve-Perthes disease?J Bone Joint Surg Br 1999 81 686CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stulberg, SDCooperman, DRWallensten, R.The natural history of Legg–Calve–Perthes diseaseJ Bone Joint Surg Am 1981 63 1095CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Herring, JAKim, HTBrowne, R.Legg-Calve-Perthes disease. Part II: Prospective multicenter study of the effect of treatment on outcomeJ Bone Joint Surg Am 2004 86 2121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiig, OTerjesen, TSvenningsen, S.Prognostic factors and outcome of treatment in Perthes’ disease: a prospective study of 368 patients with five-year follow-upJ Bone Joint Surg Br 2008 90 1364CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maxwell, SLLappin, KJKealey, WDMcDowell, BCCosgrove, AP.Arthrodiastasis in Perthes’ disease. Preliminary resultsJ Bone Joint Surg Br 2004 86 244CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Daly, KBruce, CCatterall, A.Lateral shelf acetabuloplasty in Perthes’ disease. A review of the end of growthJ Bone Joint Surg Br 1999 81 380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Domzalski, MEGlutting, JBowen, JRLateral acetabular growth stimulation following a labral support procedure in Legg–Calve–Perthes diseaseJ Bone Joint Surg Am 2006 88 1458Google ScholarPubMed
Bankes, MJCatterall, AHashemi-Nejad, A.Valgus extension osteotomy for ‘hinge abduction’ in Perthes’ disease. Results at maturity and factors influencing the radiological outcomeJ Bone Joint Surg Br 2000 82 548CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wright, JG.Evidence-Based Orthopaedics. The Best Answers to Clinical QuestionsPhiladelphia, PAWB Saunders 2009Google Scholar
Jari, SPaton, RWSrinivasan, MS.Unilateral limitation of abduction of the hip. A valuable clinical sign for DDH?J Bone Joint Surg Br 2002 84 104CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, D.Neonatal detection of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH)J Bone Joint Surg Br 1998 80 943CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graf, R.The diagnosis of congenital hip-joint dislocation by the ultrasonic Combound treatmentArch Orthop Trauma Surg 1980 97 117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harcke, HTClarke, NMLee, MSBorns, PFMacEwen, GD.Examination of the infant hip with real-time ultrasonographyJ Ultrasound Med 1984 3 131CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Graf, R.Hip sonographyDiagnosis and Management of Infant Hip DysplasiaBerlinSpringer 2006Google Scholar
Podeszwa, DAMooney, IFCramer, KEComparison of Pavlik harness application and immediate spica casting for femur fractures in infantsJ Pediatr Orthop 2004 24 460CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kocher, MSMandiga, RMurphy, JMA clinical practice guideline for treatment of septic arthritis in children: efficacy in improving process of care and effect on outcome of septic arthritis of the hipJ Bone Joint Surg Am 2003 85 994CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caird, MSFlynn, JMLeung, YLFactors distinguishing septic arthritis from transient synovitis of the hip in children. A prospective studyJ Bone Joint Surg Am 2006 88 1251CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Staheli, LPonseti, IClubfoot: Ponseti ManagementGlobal Help Publications 2009Google Scholar
Isaacs, HHandelsman, JEBadenhorst, MPickering, A.The muscles in club foot – a histological, histochemical and electron microscopic studyJ Bone Joint Surg Br 1977 59 465CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gray, DHKatz, JM.A histochemical study of muscle in club footJ Bone Joint Surg Br 1981 63 417CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wynne-Davies, R.Genetic and environmental factors in the etiology of talipes equinovarusClin Orthop Relat Res 1972 84 9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Janicki, JANarayanan, UGHarvey, BJTreatment of neuromuscular and syndrome-associated (nonidiopathic) clubfeet using the Ponseti methodJ Pediatr Orthop 2009 29 393CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alaee, FBoehm, SDobbs, MB.A new approach to the treatment of congenital vertical talusJ Child Orthop 2007 1 165CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bhaskar, A.Congenital vertical talus: treatment by reverse Ponseti techniqueIndian J Orthop 2008 42 347CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sillence, DO.Osteogenesis imperfecta nosology and geneticsAnn N Y Acad Sci 1988 543 1CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Letocha, ADCintas, HLTroendle, JFControlled trial of pamidronate in children with types III and IV osteogenesis imperfecta confirms vertebral gains but not short-term functional improvementJ Bone Mineral Res 2005 20 977CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zacharin, MBateman, J.Pamidronate treatment of osteogenesis imperfecta – lack of correlation between clinical severity, age at onset of treatment, predicted collagen mutation and treatment responseJ Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 2002 15 163CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lucas, DRWezner, KCMilner, JSVictim, perpetrator, family, and incident characteristics of infant and child homicide in the United States Air ForceChild Abuse Negl 2002 26 167CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×