Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-t6hkb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T00:11:00.222Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 8 - Examination of the colon: techniques and normal anatomy

from Section 1 - GI Tract

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2012

Marc S. Levine
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania
Parvati Ramchandani
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania
Stephen E. Rubesin
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

De Lacey, GBenson, MWilkins, RRoutine colonic lavage is unnecessary for double-contrast barium enemas in outpatientsBMJ 1982 284 1021CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dodds, WJScanlon, GTShaw, DKAn evaluation of colon cleansing regimensAJR 1977 128 57CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fork, F-TEkberg, ONilsson, GRerup, CSkinhoj, A.Colon-cleansing regimens. A clinical study in 1200 patientsGastrointest Radiol 1982 7 383CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gelfand, DWChen, YMOtt, DJ.Preparing the colon for the barium enema examinationRadiology 1991 178 609CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Irwin, JPPeterson, GH.Colon preparation for the barium enema: a guide for the radiologistGastrointest Radiol 1982 7 75CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kendrick, RGMMacKenzie, SBeckly, DE.A comparison of four methods of bowel preparation for barium enemaClin Radiol 1981 32 95CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maglinte, DDTKelvin, FMSuh, YKemp, K.Does the addition of an oral barium tracer improve the ability of the preliminary abdominal radiograph to assess efficacy of colonic cleansing? A prospective randomized controlled evaluationAbdom Imaging 2002 27 448CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, RE.The cleansing enemaRadiology 1975 117 483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harned, RKConsigny, PMCooper, NB.Barium enema examination following biopsy of the rectum or colonRadiology 1982 145 11CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maglinte, DDTStrong, RCStrate, RWBarium enema after colorectal biopsies: experimental dataAJR 1982 139 693CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eisenberg, RLHedgcock, MW.Preliminary radiograph for barium enema examination: is it necessary?AJR 1981 136 115CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stewart, ETDodds, WJNelson, JA.The value of digital rectal examination before barium enemaRadiology 1980 137 567CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dodds, WJStewart, ETNelson, JA.Rectal balloon catheters and the barium enema examinationGastrointest Radiol 1989 5 227Google Scholar
Gelfand, DW.Barium enemas, latex balloons and anaphylactic reactionsAJR 1991 156 1CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, REChernish, SMSkucas, JHypotonic colon examination with glucagonRadiology 1974 113 555CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kreel, L.Pharmacoradiology in barium examinations with special reference to glucagonBr J Radiol 1975 48 691CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lappas, JCMaglinte, DDTChernish, SMHage, JPKelvin, FM.Discomfort during double-contrast barium enema examination: a placebo-controlled double-blind evaluation of the effect of glucagon and diazepamRadiology 1995 197 95CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, RE.A new enema tipRadiology 1969 92 1492CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rubesin, SELevine, MSLaufer, IHerlinger, H.Double-contrast barium – enema examination techniqueRadiology 2000 215 642CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rubesin, SEMaglinte, DDT.Double-contrast barium enema techniqueRad Clin North Am 2003 41 365CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maglinte, DDTMiller, REChernish, SMLappas, JC.Early rectal tube removal for improved patient tolerance during double-contrast barium enema examinationRadiology 1985 155 525CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stoker, JHalligan, SBartram, CI.Pelvic floor imagingRadiology 2001 218 621CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kelvin, FMHale, DSMaglinte, DDTPatten, BJBenson, JT.Female pelvic organ prolapse: diagnostic contribution of dynamic cystoproctography and comparison with physical examinationAJR 1999 173 31CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×