Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-pkt8n Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-15T23:04:19.623Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Paediatric gynaecological ultrasound

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 March 2010

David W. Pilling MB ChB DCH DMRD FRCR FRCPCH
Affiliation:
Royal Liverpool Children's Hospital, Alder Hey, Liverpool
Jane Bates
Affiliation:
St James's University Hospital, Leeds
Get access

Summary

Ultrasound is clearly established as the imaging modality of choice for the evaluation of paediatric gynaecological conditions. In certain circumstances magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) will also have a role, as will specialised techniques such as genitography. Computed tomography (CT) has a very limited place and should be avoided, if possible, because of the significant dose of ionising radiation to the ovaries.

Ultrasound technique

Children of all ages have many special needs and all ultrasound examinations should be undertaken by those with experience of managing children who are also aware of the very different pathology likely to be encountered. Particularly for smaller children, a friendly environment is essential with appropriate toys and books to distract especially the preschool child.

As scans must be carried out transabdominally, a full bladder is necessary, which most girls over the age of 3 or 4 years can readily achieve. In younger children and babies it is pure chance as to whether the bladder is full or not. If it is not, then the infant should be given a drink and rescanned at half-hourly intervals until the bladder is full enough for an adequate examination. In neonates the bladder tends to fill and empty even more quickly so the time interval can be shorter.

Modern broadband curvilinear transducers are most appropriate, with a frequency range of 5–8 MHz in the neonate, 4–7 MHz in the older child and 3–5 MHz reserved for adolescents.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Garel, L., Dubois, J., Grignon, A., Filiatrault, D. and Vliet, G., US of the paediatric female pelvis: a clinical perspective. Radiographics, 21 (2001) 193–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, H. L., Shapiro, M. A., Mandel, F. S. and Shapiro, M. L., Normal ovaries in neonates and infants: a sonographic study of 77 patients 1 day to 24 months old. American Journal of Roentgenology, 160 (1993), 583–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohen, H. L., Eisenberg, P., Mandel, F. and Haller, J. O., Ovarian cysts are common in premenarchal girls: a sonographic study of 101 children 2–12 years old. American Journal of Roentgenology, 159 (1992), 89–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, H. J., Woo, S. K., Kim, J. S. and Suh, S. J., “Daughter cyst” sign: a sonographic finding of ovarian cysts in neonates, infants and young children. American Journal of Roentgenology, 174 (2000), 1013–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muller-Leisse, C., Bick, U., Paulussen, K.et al., Ovarian cysts in the fetus and neonate – changes in sonographic pattern in the follow-up and their management. Pediatric Radiology, 22 (1992), 395–400.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferro, F., Iacobelli, D., Zaccara, A.et al., Exteriorisation – aspiration mini laparotomy for treatment of neonatal ovarian cyst. Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology, 15 (2002), 205–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tseng, D., Curran, T. J. and Silen, M. L., Minimally invasive management of the pre natally torted ovarian cyst. Journal of Pediatric Surgery, 37 (2002), 1467–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mittermayer, C., Blaicher, W., Grassauer, D.et al., Fetal ovarian cysts: development and neonatal outcome. Ultraschall Medicine, 24 (2003), 21–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nussbaum, A., Blask, A. R., Sanders, R. C. and Gearhart, J. P., Obstructed uterovaginal anomalies: demonstration with sonography. Part I. Neonates and infants. Radiology, 179 (1991), 79–83.Google Scholar
Low, Y. and Hutson, J. M., Rules for clinical diagnosis in babies with ambiguous genitalia. Journal of Paediatric Child Health, 39 (2003), 406–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sultan, C., Paris, F., Jeandel, C., Lumbroso, S. and Galifer, R. B., Ambiguous genitalia in the new born. Seminars in Reproductive Medicine, 20 (2002), 181–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanco, J. A., Perez, C., Jimenez, M.et al., Usefulness of transrectal ultrasonography in the diagnosis of anomalies of intersexual conditions. Cir Pediatr 16 (2003), 86–9.Google Scholar
Rangecroft, L., Surgical management of ambiguous genitalia. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 88 (2003), 799–801.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Battaglia, C., Regnani, G., Mancini, F.et al., Pelvic sonography and uterine color Doppler analysis in the diagnosis of female precocious puberty. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 19 (2002), 386–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
T. D. Allen, Disorders of sexual differentiation. In Clinical Pediatric Urology, ed. Kelalis, P. P., King, L. R. and Belman, A. B. (Philadelphia: Saunders, 1985), pp. 904–21.Google Scholar
Battaglia, C., Mancini, F., Regnani, G.et al., Pelvic ultrasound and color Doppler findings in different isosexual precocities. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 22 (2003), 277–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Herter, L. D., Golendziner, E., Flores, J. A.et al., Ovarian and uterine findings in pelvic sonography: comparison between prepubertal girls, girls with isolated thelarche, and girls with central precocious puberty. Journal of Ultrasound Medicine, 21 (2002), 1237–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zwiebel, W. J. and Murray, K. A., Imaging assessment of pubertal disorders. Seminars in Ultrasound, CT and MRI, 16 (1995), 296–303.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ng, S. M., Kumar, Y., Cody, D., Smith, C. S. and Didi, M., Cranial MRI scans are indicated in all girls with central precocious puberty. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 88 (2003), 414–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cassio, A., Cacciari, E., Zucchini, S.et al., Central precocious puberty: clinical and imaging aspects. Journal of Pediatric Endocrinological Metabolism, 13 (suppl. 1), (2000) 703–6.Google ScholarPubMed
King, L. R., Siegel, M. J. and Solomon, A. L., Usefulness of ovarian volume and cysts in female isosexual precocious puberty. Journal of Ultrasound Medicine, 12 (1993), 577–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Freedman, S. M., Kreitzer, P. M., Elkowitz, S. S.et al., Ovarian microcysts in girls with isolated premature thelarche. Journal of Pediatrics, 122 (1993), 246–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Breen, J. L. and Maxson, W. S., Ovarian tumours in children and adolescents. Clinics in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 20 (1977), 607–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wu, A. and Siegel, M., Sonography of pelvic masses in children: diagnostic predictability. American Journal of Roentgenology, 148 (1987), 1199.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sisler, C. L. and Siegel, M. J., Ovarian teratomas: a comparison of the sonographic Appearance in prepubertal and postpubertal girls. American Journal of Roentgenology, 154 (1990), 139–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Templeman, C. L., Hertweck, S. P., Scheetz, J. P., Pearlman, S. E. and Fallat, M. E., The management of mature cystic teratomas in children and adolescents: a retrospective analysis. Human Reproduction, 15 (2000), 266–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stark, J. E. and Siegel, M. J., Ovarian torsion in prepubertal and pubertal girls: sonographic findings. American Journal of Roentgenology, 163 (1994), 1479–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rock, J. A., Anomalous development of the vagina. Seminars in Reproductive Endocrinology, 4 (1986), 13–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blask, A. R. Nussbaum, Sanders, R. C. and Rock, J. A., Obstructed uterovaginal anomalies: demonstration with sonography. part II. Teenagers. Radiology, 91, 84–8.
Ballesio, L., Andreoli, C., Angeli, M. L. De Cicco and Mangananro, L., Haematocolpos in double vagina associated with uterus didelphus: US and MR findings. European Journal of Radiology, 45 (2003), 150–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leurie, S., Feinstein, M. and Mamet, Y., Unusual presentation of acute abdomen in a syndrome of double uterus, unilaterally imperforated double vagina and ipsilateral renal agenesis. Acta Obstetrica Gynaecologica Scandinavica, 79 (2000), 152–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peironi, C., Rosenfeld, D. L. and Mokrzycki, M. L., Uterus didelphys with obstructed hemivagina and ipspateral renal agenesis. A case report. Journal of Reproductive Medicine, 46 (2001), 133–6.Google Scholar
Massarono, A. A., Adams, J. A., Preece, M. A. and Brook, C. G. D., Ovarian ultrasound appearances in Turner syndrome. Journal of Pediatrics, 114 (1989), 568–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sampaolo, P., Calcaterra, V., Klersy, C.et al., Pelvic ultrasound evaluation in patients with Turner's syndrome during treatment with growth hormone. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 22 (2003), 172–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McDonnell, C. M., Coleman, L. and Zacharin, M. R., A three year prospective study to assess uterine growth in girls with Turner's syndrome by pelvic ultrasound. Clinics in Endocrinology (Oxford), 58 (2003), 446–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norman, R. J., , R. W. and Stankiewicz, M. T., Polycystic ovary syndrome. Med J Aust, 180 (2004) 132–7.Google ScholarPubMed
Sampaolo, P., Livieri, C., Montanari, L., et al., Precocious signs of polycystic ovaries in obese girls. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 4 (1994), 3130–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brook, C. G. D., Jacobs, H. S. and Stanhope, R., Polycystic ovaries in childhood. British Medical Journal, 296 (1988), 878.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deutch, A. L. and Gosink, B. B., Non neoplastic gynecologic disorders. Seminars in Roentgenology, 17 (1982), 269–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orisini, L. F., Salardi, S., Pilu, G., Bovicelli, L. and Calliari, E., Pelvic organs in premenarchal girls real time ultrasonography. Radiology, 153 (1984), 113–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×