Book contents
- Pragmatics in English Language Learning
- Pragmatics in English Language Learning
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- 1 Second Language Pragmatics
- Part I Pragmatics in Action
- Part II Instructed Pragmatics
- 6 Interlanguage Pragmatic Development in a German EFL Secondary School Context
- 7 ‘Learning to Say “No” in Different Ways’
- 8 Using Self-Access Materials to Learn Pragmatics in the US Academic Setting
- Conclusion
- Index
- References
6 - Interlanguage Pragmatic Development in a German EFL Secondary School Context
Investigating Input and Output Focussing on the Speech Acts of Agreement and Disagreement
from Part II - Instructed Pragmatics
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 29 September 2022
Book contents
- Pragmatics in English Language Learning
- Pragmatics in English Language Learning
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- 1 Second Language Pragmatics
- Part I Pragmatics in Action
- Part II Instructed Pragmatics
- 6 Interlanguage Pragmatic Development in a German EFL Secondary School Context
- 7 ‘Learning to Say “No” in Different Ways’
- 8 Using Self-Access Materials to Learn Pragmatics in the US Academic Setting
- Conclusion
- Index
- References
Summary
This study examines English as a foreign language (EFL) learners’ pragmatic input and output regarding agreements and disagreements. The investigation of the EFL input materials focuses on the Lighthouse series and examines six textbooks and their accompanying audio materials for years one to six (corresponding to grades 5-10) at German intermediate secondary school. The investigation of pragmatic output presents the results of a cross-sectional developmental study conducted at a German intermediate secondary school involving two year groups - year 8 and year 10 – consisting of twenty-eight and thirty-one EFL learners respectively. The output data were elicited with an illustrated discourse completion task. The results of the input investigation revealed that L2 learners working with the textbook and audio CDs over a six-year period would have encountered a nearly even number of agreements and disagreements by the end of their studies but that the distribution across the two material types differed from year to year and also for the two speech acts. While the output data showed no considerable differences in the groups’ use of agreement strategies, differences were observed with regard to their employment of disagreement strategies and negative pragmatic transfer from learners’ L1.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Pragmatics in English Language Learning , pp. 143 - 172Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022
References
Alcón-Soler, E. (2005). Does instruction work for learning pragmatics in the EFL context? System, 33(3), 417–435.Google Scholar
Angouri, J., & Locher, M. (2012). Theorising disagreement. Journal of Pragmatics, 44(12), 1549–1553.Google Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K. (2001). Evaluating the empirical evidence. Grounds for instruction in pragmatics. In Rose, K. & Kasper, G. (eds.), Pragmatics and Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 13–32.Google Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K. (2003). Understanding the role of grammar in the acquisition of L2 pragmatics. In Martinez-Flor, A., Usó Juan, E., & Fernandez Guerra, A. (eds.), Pragmatic Competence in Foreign Language Teaching (pp. 25–44). Castelló de la Plana: Universitat Jaume I.Google Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, I. (2019). Formulaic language in second language pragmatics research. In Siyanova-Chanturia, A. & Pellicér-Sanchez, A. (eds.), Understanding Formulaic Language: A Second Language Acquisition Perspective. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 97–114.Google Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K., Mossman, S., & Vellenga, H. (2015). The effect of instruction on pragmatic routines in academic discussions. Language Teaching Research, 19(3), 324–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barron, A. (2016). Developing pragmatic competence using EFL textbooks: Focus on requests. Literacy Information and Computer Education Journal, 7(1), 2172–2179.Google Scholar
Blum-Kulka, S., House, J., & Kasper, G. (1989). Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, A. D. (2018). Learning Pragmatics from Native and Non-Native Language Teachers. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diepenbroek, L., & Derwing, T. (2013). To what extent do popular ESL textbooks incorporate oral fluency and pragmatic development? TESL Canada Journal 30(7), 1–20.Google Scholar
Ekin, M. T. Y. (2013). Do current EFL coursebooks work for the development of L2 pragmatic competence? The case of suggestions. Procedia – Social and Behavioural Sciences, 93, 1306–1311.Google Scholar
Ellis, G. (2014). ‘Young learners’ – clarifying our terms. English Language Teaching Journal, 68(1), 75–78.Google Scholar
Félix-Brasdefer, C. (2007). Pragmatic development in the Spanish FL classroom: A cross-sectional study of learner requests. Intercultural Pragmatics, 4(2), 253–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fordyce, K. (2014). The differential effects of explicit and implicit instruction on EFL learners’ use of epistemic stance. Applied Linguistics, 35(1), 6–28.Google Scholar
Glaser, K. (2014). Inductive or Deductive? The Impact of Method of Instruction on the Acquisition of Pragmatic Competence in EFL. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Glaser, K. (2020). Pragmatikvermittlung im Englischunterricht der Primarstufe: Der Sprechakt Begrüßen in Lehrplänen und Lehrwerken. In Glaser, K., & Limberg, H. (eds.), Pragmatische Kompetenzen im schulischen Fremdsprachenunterricht. Frankfurt: Peter Lang Verlag, pp. 199–248.Google Scholar
House, J. (1996). Developing pragmatic fluency in English as a foreign language: Routines and metapragmatic awareness. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 225–252.Google Scholar
Halenko, N. (2021). Teaching Pragmatics and Instructed Second Language Learning: Study Abroad and Technology-Enhanced Teaching. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Jernigan, J. (2012). Output and English as a second language pragmatic development: The effectiveness of output-focused video-based instruction. English Language Teaching, 5(4), 2–14.Google Scholar
Johnson, F. (2006). Agreement and disagreement: A cross-cultural comparison. BISAL, 1, 41–76.Google Scholar
Mugford, G. (2008). How rude! Teaching impoliteness in the second language classroom. ELT Journal, 62(4), 375–384.Google Scholar
KMK (2003). Beschlüsse der Kultusministerkonferenz: Bildungsstandards für die erste Fremdsprache (Englisch/Französisch) für den Mittleren Schulabschluss. Sekretariat der Ständigen Konferenz der Kultusminister der Länder in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. www.kmk.org/fileadmin/veroeffentlichungen_beschluesse/2003/2003_12_04-BS-erste-Fremdsprache.pdf.Google Scholar
Limberg, H. (2015). Teaching how to apologise: EFL textbooks and pragmatic input. Language Teaching Research.Google Scholar
Liew, S. T. (2016). Comparison of agreement and disagreement expressions between Malaysian and New Headway coursebooks. Malaysian Journal of ELT Research,12(1), 20–36.Google Scholar
Martinez Flor, A., & Alcón-Soler, E. (2007). Developing pragmatic awareness of suggestions in the EFL classroom: A focus on instructional effects. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 10(1), 47–76.Google Scholar
Nguyen, M. T. T. (2011). Learning to communicate in a globalised world: To what extent do school textbooks facilitate the development of intercultural pragmatic competence. RELC Journal, 42(1), 17–30.Google Scholar
Nguyen, M. T. T., Pham, T. H., & Pham, M. T. (2012). The relative effects of explicit and implicit form-focuses instruction on the development of L2 pragmatic competence. Journal of Pragmatics, 44(4), 416–434.Google Scholar
Ogiermann, E. (2010). Teaching politeness with Green Line New? In Engelhardt, M. & Gehring, W. (eds.), Fremdsprachendidaktik: Neue Aspekte in Forschung und Lehre. Oldenburg: BIS Verlag, pp. 117–134Google Scholar
Pizziconi, B., & Locher, M. (2015). Teaching and Learning (Im)Politeness. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Pomerantz, A. (1984). Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred /dispreferred turn shapes. In Maxwell Atkinson, J. & Heritage, J. (eds.), Structures of Social Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 57–101Google Scholar
Ren, W., & Han, Z. (2016). The representation of pragmatic knowledge in recent ELT textbooks. ELT Journal, 70(4), 424–434.Google Scholar
Rose, K. R. (2000). An exploratory cross-sectional study of interlanguage pragmatic development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 27–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, K. R. (2009) Interlanguage pragmatic development in Hong Kong, phase 2. Journal of Pragmatics, 41, 2345–2364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sadeghidizaj, S. (2014). The Contribution of Explicit Instruction vs. Implicit Instruction to the Acquisition of Requests and Request Responses by EFL Students in Iran. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Lancaster University.Google Scholar
Schauer, G. A. (2019). Teaching and Learning English in the Primary School: Interlanguage Pragmatics in the EFL Context. Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
Schauer, G. A. (2020). Lehrmaterialien für Sekundarschulschüler*innen mit speziellem Förderbedarf: eine kontrastive pragmatische Studie von Sprechakten in zwei Lehrwerken. In Glaser, K. & Limberg, H. (eds.), Pragmatische Kompetenzen im schulischen Fremdsprachenunterricht. Frankfurt: Peter Lang Verlag, pp. 249–275.Google Scholar
Schauer, G. A., & Adolphs, S. (2006). Expressions of gratitude in corpus and DCT data: Vocabulary, formulaic sequences, and pedagogy. System, 34(1), 119–134.Google Scholar
Schulportal Thüringen (n.d.). Englisch Grundschule. www.schulportal-thueringen.de/bildungbis10jahre/grundschule/englisch.Google Scholar
Seto, A. (2009). ‘I Agree with You’ – a corpus-based study of agreement. 3L: The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 15, 41–67.Google Scholar
Spencer-Oatey, H. (2002). Managing rapport in talk: Using rapport sensitive incidents to explore the motivational concerns underlying the management of relations. Journal of Pragmatics, 34, 529–545.Google Scholar
Spencer-Oatey, H. (2008). Face, (im)politeness and rapport. In Spencer-Oatey, H. (ed.), Culturally Speaking: Culture, Communication and Politeness Theory. London: Continuum, pp. 11–47.Google Scholar
Uso-Juan, E. (2007). The presentation and practice of the communicative act of requesting in textbooks: Focusing on modifiers. In Alcón-Soler, E. & Safont Jorda, M. P. (eds.), Intercultural Language Use and Language Learning. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 223–243.Google Scholar
Vellenga, H. (2004). Learning pragmatics from ESL & EFL textbooks: How likely? TESL EJ, 8(2).Google Scholar
Warga, M. (2004). Pragmatische Entwicklung in der Fremdsprache: Der Sprechakt ‘Aufforderung’ im Französischen. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar