Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
  • Cited by 81
Publisher:
Cambridge University Press
Online publication date:
July 2009
Print publication year:
2004
Online ISBN:
9780511510205

Book description

This book was first published in 2004. Under what conditions, in what ways, and with what effects do actors engage in politics with respect to, rather than merely within, political institutions? Using multiple methods and original data, Procedural Politics develops a theory of everyday politics with respect to rules - procedural politics - and applies it to European Union integration and politics. Assuming that actors influence maximizers, it argues and demonstrates that the jurisdiction ambiguity of issues provides opportunities for procedural politics and that influence-differences among institutional alternatives provide the incentives. It also argues and demonstrates that procedural politics occurs by predictable means (most notably, involving procedural coalition formation and strategic issue-definition) and exerts predictable effects on policymaking efficiency and outcomes and long-run institutional change. Beyond illuminating previously under-appreciated aspects of EU rule governance, these findings generalize to all rule-governed political systems and form the basis of fuller accounts of the role of institutions in political life.

Reviews

‘This book offers answers to one of the trickiest questions in EU politics: how and why are every-day decision-making rules designed? Jupille develops a highly original and sophisticated theory to answer this question, and tests his theory with an impressive dataset and detailed case-studies. As a result, this is a model piece of contemporary political science research and is sure to be a landmark text in the study of the EU.’

Simon Hix - London School of Economics

‘Joseph Jupille’s Procedural Politics is a first-rate work of institutional analysis, combining the theoretical elegance and methodological sophistication of the very best rational-choice work on US Congressional institutions with a rigorous quantitative and qualitative study of the politics of the European Union. Jupille's hypotheses about the conditions under which, and the ways in which, EU actors engage in procedural disputes are clearly articulated and tested with rigor, and the implications of the book extend beyond the EU to any political system - and there are many - in which actors might be tempted to manipulate legislative procedure for their own purposes.’

Mark Pollack - University of Wisconsin

Refine List

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
×

Contents

Bibliography
Bibliography
Arp, Henning A. 1992. The European Parliament in European Community Environmental Policy. EUI Working Paper No. EPU 92/13. Fiesola, Italy: European University Institute
Aspinwall, Mark, and Schneider, Gerald. 2000. Same Menu, Separate Tables: The Institutionalist Turn in Political Science and the Study of European Integration. European Journal of Political Research 38:1–36
Bach, Stanley, and Steven S. Smith. 1988. Managing Uncertainty in the House of Representatives: Adaptation and Innovation in Special Rules. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution
Ballman, Alexander, Epstein, David, and O'Halloran, Sharyn. 2002. Delegation, Comitology, and the Separation of Powers in the European Union. International Organziation 56, 3 (Summer):551–574
Barents, René. 1988. Hormones and the Growth of Community Agricultural Law: Some Reflections on the Hormones Judgment (Case 68/86). Legal Issues of European Integration 1:1–15
Barents, René. 1989. Community Agricultural Law and the Court's Case Law in 1986–1988. Common Market Law Review 26, 3 (Autumn):391–421
Barents, René. 1993. The Internal Market Unlimited: Some Observations on the Legal Basis of Community Legislation. Common Market Law Review 30, 1 (February):85–109
Barents, René. 1994. The Agricultural Law of the EC: An Inquiry into the Administrative Law of the European Community in the Field of Agriculture. Deventer: Kluwer Law and Taxation Publishers
Barnard, Catherine. 1992. Where Politicians Fear to Tread?European Law Review 17, 2 (April):127–133
Barry, Brian. 1980. Is It Better to Be Powerful or Lucky? Part 2. Political Studies 28, 3 (September):338–352
Bates, Robert H. 1988. Contra Contractarianism: Some Reflections on the New Institutionalism. Politics and Society 16:387–401
Baum, Lawrence. 1997. The Puzzle of Judicial Behavior. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press
Baumgartner, Frank R., and Bryan D. Jones. 1993. Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Baumgartner, Frank R., Jones, Bryan D., and MacLeod., Michael C. 2000. The Evolution of Legislative Jurisdictions. Journal of Politics 62, 2 (May):321–349
Bawn, Kathleen. 1993. The Logic of Institutional Preferences: German Electoral Law as a Social Choice Outcome. American Journal of Political Science 37, 4 (November):965–989
Baziadoly, Sophie. 1992. Le refus de la décharge par le Parlement Européen. Revue du marché Commun et de l'union européenne 354 (January):58–73
Bednar, Jenna, Ferejohn, John, and Garrett, Geoffrey. 1996. The Politics of European Federalism. International Review of Law and Economics 16, 3 (September): 279–294
Bell, Andrew. 1989. Judgments on Majority Voting. International and Comparative Law Quarterly 38 (July):688–689
Bieber, Roland. 1992. Majority Voting and the Cooperation Procedure. In From Luxembourg to Maastricht: Institutional Change in the European Community After the Single European Act, edited by Christian Engel and Wolfgang Wessels, 51–65. Bonn: European Union Verlag
Binder, Sarah A. 1996. The Partisan Basis of Procedural Choice: Allocating Parliamentary Rights in the House, 1789–1990. American Political Science Review 90, 1 (March):8–20
Binder, Sarah A. 1997. Minority Rights, Majority Rule: Partisanship and the Development of Congress. New York: Cambridge University Press
Binder, Sarah A., and Steven S. Smith. 1997. Politics or Principle: Filibustering in the United States Senate. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution
Binder, Sarah, and Smith, Steven S.. 1998. Political Goals and Procedural Choice in the Senate. Journal of Politics 60, 2 (May):398–416
Blanquet, Marc. 1998. Le Contrôle Parlementaire Européen sur la crise de la “vache folle.”Revue du Marché commun et de l'Union européenne 420 (July–August):457–467
Blumann, Claude. 1988. L'affaire des hormones devant la Cour de Justice des Communautés Européennes. Cahiers de Droit Européen 168 (December):505–513
Blumann, Claude. 1996. Politique Agricole Commune: Droit communautaire agricole et agro-alimentaire. Paris: Litec
Blumann, Claude, and Adam, Valérie. 1997. La politique agricole commune dans la tourmente: la crise de la “vache folle”. Revue Trimestrielle de Droit Européen 33, 2 (April–June):239–293
Bos, Pierre V. F. 1991. The Proposed Regulation on the Supervision and Control of Movement of Waste: Some Comments. In Current EC Legal Developments: EC Environment and Planning Law, edited by David Vaughan, 150–168. London: Butterworth
Bradley, Kieran St. C. 1988. The European Court and the Legal Basis of Community Legislation. European Law Review 13, 6 (December):379–402
Bradley, Kieran St. C. 1992. L'arrêt dioxyde de titane: un jugement de Salomon?Cahiers de Droit Européen 5/6:609–630
Bräuninger, Thomas, et al. 2001. The Dynamics of European Integration: A Constitutional Analysis of the Amsterdam Treaty. In The Rules of Integration: Institutionalist Approaches to the Study of Europe, edited by Gerald Schneider and Mark Aspinwall, 46–68. Manchester: Manchester University Press
Bridge, John. 1988. Note on Cases 68/86 (Hormones) and 131/86 (Battery Hens). Common Market Law Review 25, 4 (Winter):733–742
Bromley, Daniel W. 1989. Economic Interests and Institutions: The Conceptual Foundations of Public Policy. New York: Basil Blackwell
Buchwitz, Rebekka. 1998. A Positive Analysis of European Deregulation. Aussenwirtschaft 53, 4 (December):553–571
Budge, Ian. 2001. Validating Party Position Placements. British Journal of Political Science 31, 1 (January):210–223
Budge, Ian, et al., eds. 2001. Mapping Preferences: Parties, Electors, and Governments, 1945–1998. London: Oxford University Press
Burhenne, Wolfgang E., and Schoenbaum, Thomas J.. 1973. The European Community and Management of the Environment: A Dilemma. Natural Resources Journal 13:494–503
Burley, Anne-Marie, and Mattli, Walter. 1993. Europe Before the Court: A Political Theory of Legal Integration. International Organization 47 (Winter):41–76
Calvert, Randall L. 1995a. Rational Actors, Equilibrium, and Social Institutions. In Explaining Social Institutions, edited by Jack Knight and Itai Sened, 57–93. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press
Calvert, Randall L. 1995b. The Rational Choice Theory of Social Institutions: Cooperation, Coordination, and Communication. In Modern Political Economy: Old Topics, New Directions, edited by Jeffrey S. Banks and Eric A. Hanushek, 216–267. New York: Cambridge University Press
Cammack, Paul. 1992. The New Institutionalism: Predatory Rule, Institutional Persistence, and Macro-Social Change. Economy and Society 21, 4 (November):397–429
Carpentier, Michel. 1972. L'action de la Communauté en matière d'environnement. Revue du Marché Commun, 153:381–394
Carrubba, Clifford J., and Volden, Craig. 2001. Explaining Institutional Change in the European Union: What Determines the Voting Rule in the Council of Ministers?European Union Politics 2, 1:5–30
Carrubba, Clifford J., et al. 2003. Off the Record: Unrecorded Legislative Votes, Selection Bias, and Roll-Call Vote Analysis. Unpublished manuscript
Chayes, Abram, and Chayes, Antonia Handler. 1993. On Compliance. International Organization 47, 2 (Spring):175–205
Chisholm, Donald. 1995. Problem Solving and Institutional Design. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 5, 4 (October):451–491
Clayton, Cornell W., and Howard Gilman, eds. 1999. Supreme Court Decision-Making: New Institutionalist Approaches. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Close, George. 1978. Harmonisation of Laws: Use or Abuse of the Powers Under the EEC Treaty?European Law Review 3:461–481
Coase, R. H. 1937/1988. The Nature of the Firm. In The Firm, the Market, and the Law, 33–55. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Cohen, Michael D., March, James G., and Olsen, Johan P.. 1972. A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice. Administrative Science Quarterly 17, 1 (March):1–25
Collins, Ken. 1995. Plans and Prospects for the European Parliament in Shaping Future Environmental Policy. European Environmental Law Review 4, 3 (March):74–77
Commission of the European Communities [CEC]. 1971a. Fourth General Report on the Activities of the Communities, 1970. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, February
Commission of the European Communities [CEC]. 1971b. SEC (71) 2616 final. First Communication of the Commission About the Community's Policy on the Environment. 22 July
Commission of the European Communities [CEC]. 1995. Report on the Operation of the Treaty on European Union. SEC(95) 731 final, 10 May
Common Market Law Review. 1982. The Vote on Agricultural Prices: A New Departure? 19, 3 (August):371–372
Conant, Lisa J. 1998. Contained Justice: The Politics Behind Europe's Rule of Law. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Political Science, University of Washington, Seattle
Corbett, Richard. 1989. Testing the New Procedures: The European Parliament's First Experiences with Its New “Single Act” Powers. Journal of Common Market Studies 27, 4 (June):359–372
Corbett, Richard. 1998. The European Parliament's Role in Closer European Union Integration. London: Palgrave Macmillan
Corbett, Richard, Francis Jacobs, and Michael Shackleton. 2000. The European Parliament, 4th edition. London: John Harper Publishing
Corbett, Richard, and Otto Schmuck. 1992. The New Procedures of the European Community After the Single European Act: Efficiency and Legitimacy in the Light of Experience. In From Luxembourg to Maastricht: Institutional Change in the European Community After the Single European Act, edited by Christian Engel and Wolfgang Wessels, 33–49. Bonn: European Union Verlag
Cox, Gary W., and Mathew D. McCubbins. 1993. Legislative Leviathan: Party Government in the House. Berkeley: University of California Press
Cox, Gary W., and Mathew D. McCubbins. 1995. Bonding, Structure, and the Stability of Political Parties: Party Government in the House. In Positive Theories of Congressional Institutions, edited by Kenneth A. Shepsle and Barry R. Weingast, 101–118. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press
Cox, Gary W., and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 1997. Toward a Theory of Legislative Rules Changes: Assessing Schickler and Rich's Evidence. American Journal of Political Science 41:1376–1386
Crombez, Christophe. 1996. Legislative Procedures in the European Community. British Journal of Political Science 26 (April):199–228
Crombez, Christophe. 1997a. The Co-Decision Procedure in the European Union. Legislative Studies Quarterly 22, 1 (February):97–119
Crombez, Christophe. 1997b. Policy Making and Commission Appointment in the European Union. Aussenwirtschaft 52, 1/2:63–82
Crombez, Christophe. 2000. Institutional Reform and Co-Decision in the European Union. Constitutional Political Economy 11:41–57
Crombez, Christophe. 2001. The Treaty of Amsterdam and the Co-Decision Procedure. In The Rules of Integration: Institutionalist Approaches to the Study of Europe, edited by Mark Aspinwall and Gerald Schneider, 101–122. Manchester: Manchester University Press
Crosby, Scott. 1991. The Single Market and the Rule of Law. European Law Review 16, 6 (December):451–465
Cullen, Holly, and Charlesworth, Andrew. 1999. Diplomacy by Other Means: The Use of Legal Basis Litigation as a Political Strategy by the European Parliament and Member States. Common Market Law Review 36, 6 (December):1243–1270
Curtin, Deirdre. 1993. The Constitutional Structure of the Union: A Europe of Bits and Pieces. Common Market Law Review 30, 1 (February):17–69
Dashwood, Alan. 1989. Majority Voting in the Council. In Legislation for Europe 1992, edited by Jürgen Schwarze, 79–83. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft
Dashwood, Alan. 2001. The Constitution of the European Union After Nice: Law-Making Procedures. European Law Review 26, 3:215–238
David, Paul A. 1985. Clio and the Economics of QWERTY. American Economic Review 75, 2 (May):332–338
David, Paul A. 1994. Why Are Institutions the ‘Carriers of History’? Path Dependence and the Evolution of Conventions, Organizations, and Institutions. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 5, 2:205–220
de Ruyt, Jean. 1989. L'Acte unique Européen: Commentaire, 2nd edition. Brussels: Éditions de l'Université de Bruxelles
Sadeleer, Nicolas. 1991. Le Droit Communautaire de l'Environnement, un droit sous-tendu par les seuls motifs économiques?Aménagement-Environnement 4:217–223
Sadeleer, Nicolas. 1993a. Case Note C-155/91, Commission v. Council. Journal of Environmental Law 5, 2:295–300
Sadeleer, Nicolas. 1993b. La querelle sur le choix de la base juridique des actes communautaires relatifs à la protection de l'environnement, suite et fin?Aménagement-Environnement 2:81–85
Sadeleer, Nicolas. 1993c. La question de la base juridique des actes communautaires ayant trait à la protection de l'environnement: symbiose ou opposition entre la politique d'établissement du marché intérieur et la politique de protection de l'environnement?Revue Juridique de l'Environnement 4:597–616
Sadeleer, Nicolas. 1994. La circulation des déchets et le Marché unique européen. Revue du Marché Unique Européen 1:71–116
Debroux, Xavier. 1995. Le choix de la base juridique dans l'action environnementale de l'Union Européenne. Cahiers de Droit Européen 3/4:383–397
Demaris, Alfred. 1992. Logit Modeling: Practical Applications. Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences Series, Number 86. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
Deniau, Xavier. 1984. Le vote au sein du Conseil des Ministres des Communautés Européennes: Théorie et pratique. Revue du Marché Commun 279 (July–August):316–318
Denzau, Arthur T., and Mackay, Robert J.. 1983. Gatekeeping and Monopoly Power of Committees: An Analysis of Sincere and Sophisticated Behavior. American Journal of Political Science 27:740–761
Dewost, Jean-Louis. 1980. Les relations entre le Conseil et la Commission dans le processus de décision Communautaire. Revue du Marché Commun 238 (June–July):289–294
Dewost, Jean-Louis. 1984. L'avenir du fonctionnement des Institutions: Le Conseil. Annales de la Faculté de Droit, d'économie et de sciences sociales de Liège 29, 4:293–305
Dewost, Jean-Louis. 1987. Le vote majoritaire: simple modalité de gestion ou enjeu politique essentielle? In Du Droit International au Droit de l'intégration, edited by F. Capotorti et al., 167–175. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft
Dewost, Jean-Louis. 1989. Rôle et position de la Commission dans le processus législatif. In Legislation for Europe 1992, edited by Jürgen Schwarze, 85–96. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft
Diermeier, Daniel, and Krehbiel, Keith. 2003. Institutionalism as a Methodology. Journal of Theoretical Politics 15, 2:123–144
Dion, Douglas. 1997. Turning the Legislative Thumbscrew: Minority Rights and Procedural Change in Legislative Politics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press
Dion, Douglas, and Huber, John. 1996. Procedural Choice and the House Committee on Rules. Journal of Politics 58:25–54
Dion, Douglas, and Huber, John. 1997. Sense and Sensibility: The Role of Rules. American Journal of Political Science 41:945–957
Dogan, Rhys. 1997. Comitology: Little Procedures with Big Implications. West European Politics 20, 3 (Winter):31–60
Dowding, Keith. 2000. Institutionalist Research on the European Union. European Union Politics 1, 1:125–144
Earnshaw, David, and Judge, David. 1993. The European Parliament and the Sweeteners Directive: From Footnote to Inter-Institutional Conflict. Journal of Common Market Studies 31, 1 (March):103–116
Earnshaw, David, and Judge, David. 1997. The Life and Times of the European Union's Co-operation Procedure. Journal of Common Market Studies 35, 4 (December):543–564
Elles, Lady Diana. 1989. The innovations introduced by the Single European Act: Some Big Steps Forward. In Legislation for Europe 1992, edited by Jürgen Schwarze, 45–51. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft
Emiliou, Nicholas. 1994. Opening Pandora's Box: The Legal Basis of Community Measures Before the Court of Justice. European Law Review 19:488–507
Ensminger, Jean, and Knight, Jack. 1997. Changing Social Norms: Common Property, Bridewealth, and Clan Exogamy. Current Anthropology 38:1–24
Epstein, Lee, and Jack Knight. 1998. The Choices Justices Make. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press
European Law Review. 1982. Overriding the British Farm Price “Veto.” 7, 3 (June):145–146
European Parliament [European Parliament]. 1970. PE Doc. 161/70, Rapport fait au nom de la commission des affaires sociales et de la santé publique sur la lutte contre la pollution des eaux fluviales et notamment des eaux du Rhin [Rapporteur: M. Boersma]. 11 November
European Parliament [European Parliament]. 1972. PE Doc. 9/72, Rapport fait au nom de la commission des affaires sociales et de la santé publique sur la première communication de la Commission des Communautés européennes sur la politique de la Communauté en matière d'environnement [Rapporteur: Jahn]. 14 April
European Parliament [European Parliament]. 1999. The European Union and Food Security: Lessons from the Bovine spongiform encephalopathy Crisis. Luxembourg: OOPEC
Farrell, Henry, and Héritier, Adrienne. 2003. Formal and Informal Institutions Under Codecision: Continuous Constitution-Building in Europe. Governance 16, 4 (October):577–600
Field, Alexander James. 1979. On the Explanation of Rules Using Rational Choice Models. Journal of Economic Issues 13:49–72
Field, Alexander James. 1981. The Problem with Neoclassical Institutional Economics: A Critique with Special Reference to the North/Thomas Model of Pre-1500 Europe. Explorations in Economic History 18:174–198
Field, Alexander James. 1984. Microeconomics, Norms, and Rationality. Economic Development and Cultural Change 32, 4 (July):683–711
Firmin-Sellers, Kathryn. 1996. The Transformation of Property Rights in the Gold Coast: An Empirical Analysis Applying Rational Choice Theory. New York: Cambridge University Press
Fitzmaurice, John. 1988. An Analysis of the European Community's Co-Operation Procedure. Journal of Common Market Studies 26, 4 (June):389–400
Flynn, James. 1987. How Will Article 100A(4) Work? A Comparison with Article 93. Common Market Law Review 24:689–707
Franchino, Fabio. 2000. Control of the Commission's Executive Functions: Uncertainty, Conflict, and Decision Rules. European Union Politics 1, 1:63–92
Franchino, Fabio. 2002. Efficiency or Credibility? Testing the Two Logics of Delegation to the European Commission. Journal of European Public Policy 9, 5 (October):677–694
Freestone, David, and Ryland, Diane. 1994. EC Environmental Law after Maastricht. Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly 45, 2 (Summer):152–176
Friedman, Milton. 1953. The Methodology of Positive Economics. In Essays in Positive Economics, 3–43. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Garcia, Thierry. 1997. Crise de la “Vache Folle,” Crise dans l'Union Européenne. Revue du Marché commun et de l'Union européenne 407 (April):243–252
Garrett, Geoffrey. 1992. International Cooperation and Institutional Choice: The European Community's Internal Market. International Organization 46, 2 (Spring):533–560
Garrett, Geoffrey. 1995a. From the Luxembourg Compromise to Codecision: Decision Making in the European Union. Electoral Studies 14:289–308
Garrett, Geoffrey. 1995b. The Politics of Legal Integration in the European Union. International Organization 49, 1 (Winter):171–182
Garrett, Geoffrey, Kelemen, R. Daniel, and Schulz, Heiner. 1998. The European Court of Justice, National Governments, and Legal Integration in the European Union. International Organization 52, 1 (Winter):149–176
Garrett, Geoffrey, and Tsebelis, George. 1996. An Institutional Critique of Intergovernmentalism. International Organization 50, 2 (Spring):237–268
Garrett, Geoffrey, and Tsebelis, George. 1998. More on the Co-Decision Endgame. Journal of Legislative Studies 3, 4 (Winter):139–143
Garrett, Geoffrey, and Tsebelis, George. 2001. Understanding Better the European Union Legislative Process (in “Forum Section: The European Union Legislative Process: Academics vs. Practitioners – Round 2”). European Union Politics 2, 3 (October): 353–361
Garrett, Geoffrey, and Barry R. Weingast. 1993. Ideas, Interests, and Institutions: Constructing the European Community's Internal Market. In Ideas and Foreign Policy: Beliefs, Institutions, and Political Change, edited by Judith Goldstein and Robert O. Keohane, 173–206. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press
Geradin, Damien. 1993a. The Legal Basis of the Waste Directive. European Law Review 18, 5 (October):418–427
Geradin, Damien. 1993b. Trade and Environmental Protection: Community Harmonization and National Environmental Standards. Yearbook of European Law 13:151–199
Geradin, Damien. 1995. Balancing Free Trade and Environment Protection: The Interplay Between the European Court of Justice and the Community Legislator. In Trade and The Environment: The Search for Balance, edited by James Cameron, Paul Demaret, and Damien Geradin, 204–241. London: Cameron May
Gerard, Alain. 1975. Les limites et les moyens juridiques de l'intervention des Communautés Européennes en matière de l'environnement. Cahiers de Droit Européen 11, 1–2:14–30
Goldberg, Victor P. 1974. Institutional Change and the Quasi-Invisible Hand. Journal of Law and Economics 17:461–492
Golub, Jonathan. 1997. In the Shadow of the Vote? Decisionmaking Efficiency in the European Community 1974–1995. Member of parliamentlfG Discussion Paper 97/3. Cologne: Max Planck Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung, December
Golub, Jonathan. 1999. In the Shadow of the Vote? Decision Making in the European Community. International Organization 53, 4 (Autumn):733–764
Golub, Jonathan. 2002. Institutional Reform and Decisionmaking in the European Union. In Institutional Challenges in the European Union, edited by Madeleine Hosli and Adrian van Deemen. London: Routledge
Goodin, Robert E. 1996a. Institutions and Their Design. In The Theory of Institutional Design, edited by Robert E. Goodin, 1–53. New York: Cambridge University Press
Goodin, Robert E., ed. 1996b. The Theory of Institutional Design. New York: Cambridge University Press
Gosalbo Bono, Ricardo. 1994. Co-Decision: An Appraisal of the Experience of the European Parliament as Co-Legislator. Yearbook of European Law 14:21–71
Goybet, Catherine. 1997. La Vache Folle Fera-t-elle Évoluer l'Europe?Revue du Marché commun et de l'Union européenne no. 407 (April):229–232
Grabitz, Eberhard, and Christoph Sasse. 1977. Competence of the European Communities for Environmental Policy: Proposal for an Amendment to the Treaty of Rome. Berlin: Erich Schmidt Verlag
Grafstein, Robert. 1992. Institutional Realism: Social and Political Constraints on Rational Actors. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press
Granovetter, Mark. 1985. Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology 91, 3 (November):481–510
Granovetter, Mark. 1992. Economic Institutions as Social Constructions: A Framework for Analysis. Acta Sociologica 35:3–11
Greenpeace International. 1991. The Single European Dump: Free Trade in Hazardous and Nuclear Wastes in the New Europe. Available at URL http://www.greenpeace.org/gopher/campaigns/toxics/1991/eurodump.txt (accessed 26 June 2001). 4 December
Gruber, Lloyd. 2000. Ruling the World: Power Politics and the Rise of Supranational Institutions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
Gulmann, Claus. 1987. The Single European Act–Some Remarks from a Danish Perspective. Common Market Law Review 24:31–40
Hall, Peter A., and Taylor, Rosemary C. R.. 1996. Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms. Political Studies 44 (December):936–957
Hannequart, Jean-Pierre. 1979. Le Parlement européen et l'environnement. Res Publica 21, 1:127–143
Harsanyi, John C. 1969. Rational-Choice Models of Political Behavior vs. Functionalist and Conformist Theories. World Politics 21, 4 (July):513–538
Hildyard, Nicholas. 1993. Maastricht: The Protectionism of Free Trade. Ecologist 23, 2 (March/April):45–51
Hix, Simon. 1999a. Constitutional Agenda-Setting Through Discretion in Rule Interpretation: Why the European Parliament Won at Amsterdam. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Atlanta, GA, 2–5 September
Hix, Simon. 1999b. The Political System of the European Union. New York: St. Martin's Press
Hix, Simon. 2002. Constitutional Agenda-Setting Through Discretion in Rule Interpretation: Why the European Parliament Won at Amsterdam. British Journal of Political Science 32, 2 (April):259–280
Hix, Simon, Kreppel, Amie, and Noury, Abdul. 2003. The Party System in the European Parliament: Collusive or Competitive?Journal of Common Market Studies 41, 2:309–331
Hix, Simon, Abdul Noury, and Gérard Roland. 2003. Power to the Parties: Cohesion and Competition in the European Parliament, 1979–2001. Unpublished manuscript, URL http://www.lse-students.ac.uk/HIX/Working%20Papers/HNR-Power%20to%20the%20Parties-June03.pdf (last consulted 1 July 2003)
Hooghe, Liesbet. 1999a. Images of Europe: Orientations to European Integration Among Senior Commission Officials. British Journal of Political Science 29, 2:345–373
Hooghe, Liesbet. 1999b. Supranational Activists or Intergovernmental Agents? Explaining Orientations of Senior Commission Officials Towards European Integration. Comparative Political Studies 32, 4:435–463
Hooghe, Liesbet. 2001. Top Commission Officials on Capitalism: An Institutionalist Understanding of Preferences. In The Rules of Integration: Institutionalist Approaches to the Study of Europe, edited by Mark Aspinwall and Gerald Schneider, 152–173. Manchester: Manchester University Press
Hooghe, Liesbet. 2002. The European Commission and the Integration of Europe: Images of Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002
Horn, Murray J. 1995. The Political Economy of Public Administration: Institutional Choice in the Public Sector. New York: Cambridge University Press
House of Commons Select Committee on European Legislation. 1984. First Special Report, Session 1983–84, HC 126–ⅳ. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office
House of Commons Select Committee on European Legislation. 1988. Choice of Treaty Base after the Single European Act, Session 1987–88, HC 178–ⅳ and 178–ⅴ. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office
House of Lords Select Committee on the European Communities. 1978. Approximation of Laws Under Article 100 of the EEC Treaty. Session 1977–78, 22nd Report. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office
Huber, John D. 1992. Restrictive Legislative Procedures in France and the United States. American Political Science Review 86:675–687
Huber, John D. 1996. Rationalizing Parliament: Legislative Institutions and Party Politics in France. New York: Cambridge University Press
Hubschmid, Claudia, and Moser, Peter. 1997. The Co-operation Procedure in the European Union: Why Was the European Parliament Influential in the Decision on Car Emission Standards?Journal of Common Market Studies 35:225–242
Hug, Simon. 1997. The Commission as a Pawn to the Member Countries: Comment to Christophe Crombez. Aussenwirtschaft 52, 1/2:83–86
Hug, Simon. 2003. Endogenous Preferences and Delegation in the European Union. Comparative Political Studies 36, 1/2:41–74
Hug, Simon, and König, Thomas. 2002. In View of Ratification: Governmental Preferences and Domestic Constraints at the Amsterdam Intergovernmental Conference. International Organization 56, 2 (Spring 2002):447–476
Immergut, Ellen M. 1998. The Theoretical Core of the New Institutionalism. Politics & Society 26, 1 (March):5–34
Jacqué, Jean-Paul. 1986. The “Single European Act” and Environmental Policy. Environmental Policy and Law 16:122–124
Judge, David. 1993. “Predestined to Save the Earth”: The Environment Committee of the European Parliament. In A Green Dimension for the European Community: Political Issues and Processes, edited by David Judge, 186–212. London: Frank Cass
Judge, David, and David, Earnshaw. 1994. Weak European Parliament Influence? A Study of the Environment Committee of the European Parliament. Government and Opposition 29, 2 (Spring):262–276
Judge, David, David, Earnshaw, and Ngaire, Cowan. 1994. Ripples or Waves? The European Parliament in the European Community Policy Process. Journal of European Public Policy 1, 1 (June):27–52
Jupille, Joseph. 1996. Free Movement of Goods and Hazardous Waste: Reconciling the Single Market with Environmental Imperatives. Paper presented at the 37th Annual Meeting of the International Studies Association (ISA), San Diego, CA, 6–20 April
Jupille, Joseph. 1999. The European Union and International Outcomes. International Organization 53, 2 (Spring):409–425
Jupille, Joseph, and James, A. Caporaso. 1999. Institutionalism and the European Union: Beyond International Relations and Comparative Politics. Annual Review of Political Science 2:409–425
Jupille, Joseph, Caporaso, James A., and Checkel, Jeffrey T.. 2003. Integrating Institutions: Rationalism, Constructivism, and the Study of the European Union. Comparative Political Studies 36, 1–2 (February/March):7–40
Kapteyn, P. J. G., and P. VerLoren van Themaat. 1998. Introduction to the Law of the European Communities: From Maastricht to Amsterdam, 3rd edition. London: Kluwer Law International
Kato, Junko. 1996. Institutions and Rationality in Politics: Three Varieties of Neo-Institutionalists. British Journal of Political Science 26, 4:553–582
Keeler, John T. S. 1993. Executive Power and Policymaking Patterns in France: Gauging the Impact of Fifth Republic Institutions. West European Politics 16 (October):518–544
Kelemen, R. Daniel. 1995. Environmental Policy in the European Union: The Struggle Between Court, Commission and Council. In Convergence or Diversity? Internationalization and Economic Policy Response, edited by Birgitte Unger and Frans Van Waarden, 306–332. Brookfield: Averbury
Keohane, Robert O. 1984. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
Kiewiet, D. Roderick, and Mathew D. McCubbins. 1991. The Logic of Delegation: Congressional Parties and the Appropriations Process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Kim, Hee-Min, and Richard C. Fording. 2001. Extending Party Estimates to Governments and Electors. In Mapping Policy Preferences: Estimates for Parties, Electors, and Governments 1945–1998, edited by Ian Budge et al., 157–178. New York: Oxford University Press
King, David C. 1997. Turf Wars: How Congressional Committees Claim Jurisdiction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
King, Gary, and Langche, Zeng. 2001a. Logistic Regression in Rare Events Data. Political Analysis 9, 2:137–163
King, Gary, and Langche, Zeng. 2001b. Explaining Rare Events in International Relations. International Organization 55, 3 (Summer):693–715
Kirchner, Emil, and Williams, Karen. 1983. The Legal, Political and Institutional Implications of the 1980 Isoglucose Judgements. Journal of Common Market Studies 22 (2):173–190
Kiser, Larry L., and Elinor Ostrom. 1982. The Three Worlds of Action: A Metatheoretical Synthesis of Institutional Approaches. In Strategies of Political Inquiry, edited by Elinor Ostrom, 179–219. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications
Knight, Jack. 1992. Institutions and Social Conflict. New York: Cambridge University Press
Knill, Christophe, and Andrea, Lenschow. 2001. “Seek and Ye Shall Find!” Linking Different Perspectives on Institutional Change. Comparative Political Studies 34, 2 (March):187–215
Koelble, Thomas A. 1995. The New Institutionalism in Political Science and Sociology. Comparative Politics 27, 2 (January):231–243
König, Thomas. 2001. Pivotal Politics in European Legislation: An Event History Analysis of the European Union Legislative Decision-Making Process from 1984 to 1995. Delivered at the ECPR Joint Sessions, Grenoble, France
König, Thomas, and Thomas, Bräuninger. 2000. Decisiveness and Inclusiveness: Two Aspects of the Intergovernmental Choice of European Voting Rules. Homo Oeconomicus 17, 1/2:1–17
König, Thomas, and Mirja, Pöter. 2001. Examining the European Union Legislative Process. European Union Politics 2, 3 (October):329–352
Koremenos, Barbara, Charles Lipson, and Duncan Snidal, eds. 2001. The Rational Design of International Institutions. Special issue of International Organization (vol. 55. n. 4)
Krämer, Ludwig. 1987. The Single European Act and Environmental Protection: Reflections on Several New Provisions in Community Law. Common Market Law Review 24:659–688
Krämer, Ludwig. 1991. Community Environmental Law: Towards a Systematic Approach. Yearbook of European Law 11:151–184
Krämer, Ludwig. 1992. Focus on European Environmental Law. London: Sweet & Maxwell
Krämer, Ludwig. 1993. European Environmental Law Casebook. London: Sweet & Maxwell
Krämer, Ludwig. 1998. E. C. Treaty and Environmental Law, 3rd edition. London: Sweet and Maxwell
Krämer, Ludwig. N.d. La base juridique dans le domaine de l'environnement: articles 100A et 130S du traité. European Commission unnumbered memo
Kranz, Jerzy. 1982. Le vote dans la pratique du Conseil des ministres des Communautés européennes. Revue Trimestrielle de Droit Européen 18, 3 (July–September):403–430
Krasner, Stephen D. 1984. Approaches to the State: Alternative Conceptions and Historical Dynamics. Comparative Politics 16, 2 (January):223–246
Krasner, Stephen D. 1985. Structural Conflict: The Third World Against Global Liberalism. Berkeley: University of California Press
Krasner, Stephen D. 1991. Global Communications and National Power: Life on the Pareto Frontier. World Politics 43:336–366
Krehbiel, Keith. 1986. Unanimous Consent Agreements: Going Along in the Senate. Journal of Politics 48, 3 (August):541–564
Krehbiel, Keith. 1988. Spatial Models of Legislative Choice. Legislative Studies Quarterly 13, 3 (August):259–319
Krehbiel, Keith. 1991. Information and Legislative Organization. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press
Krehbiel, Keith. 1997a. Restrictive rules reconsidered. American Journal of Political Science 41:919–947
Krehbiel, Keith. 1997b. Rejoinder to “Sense and Sensibility.”American Journal of Political Science 41:958–964
Krehbiel, Keith. 1998. Pivotal Politics: A Theory of U.S. Lawmaking. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Krehbiel, Keith, and Douglas, Rivers. 1988. The Analysis of Committee Power: An Application to Senate Voting on the Minimum Wage. American Journal of Political Science 32, 4 (November):1151–1174
Krehbiel, Keith, Kenneth, A. Shepsle, and Barry, R. Weingast. 1987. Why Are Congressional Committees Powerful?American Political Science Review 81, 3 (September):929–945
Kreppel, Amie. 1999. What Affects the European Parliament's Legislative Influence? An Analysis of the Success of European Parliament Amendments. Journal of Common Market Studies 37, 3 (September): 521–538
Kreppel, Amie. 2000. Rules, Ideology and Coalition Formation in the European Parliament: Past Present and Future. European Union Politics 1, 3:340–362
Kreppel, Amie. 2002a. The European Parliament and the Supranational Party System: A Study of Institutional Development. New York: Cambridge University Press
Kreppel, Amie. 2002b. Moving Beyond Procedure: An Empirical Analysis of European Parliament Legislative Influence. Comparative Political Studies 35, 7:784–813
Kreppel, Amie, and Simon, Hix. 2003. From “Grand Coalition” to Left-Right Confrontation: Explaining the Shifting Structure of Party Competition in the European Parliament. Comparative Political Studies 36, 1–2:75–96
Kreppel, Amie, and George, Tsebelis. 1999. Coalition Formation in the European Parliament. Comparative Political Studies 32, 8:933–66
Lange, Peter. 1993. Maastricht and the Social Protocol: Why Did They Do It?Politics & Society 21 (March):5–36
Langeheine, Bernd. 1989. Le rapprochement des législations nationales selon l'article 100A du traité CEE: L'harmonisation communautaire face aux exigences de protection nationales. Revue du Marché Commun 328 (June):347–359
Laver, Michael, and John, Garry. 2000. Estimating Policy Positions from Political Texts. American Journal of Political Science 44:619–634
Laver, Michael, and W. Ben Hunt. 1992. Policy and Party Competition. New York: Routledge
Lenaerts, Koen. 1992. Some Thoughts About the Interaction Between Judges and Politicians in the European Community. Yearbook of European Law 12:1–34
Lenaerts, Koen. 1994. The Principle of Subsidiarity and the Environment in the European Union: Keeping the Balance of Federalism. Fordham International Law Journal 17, 4:846–895
Levi, Margaret. 1988. Of Rule and Revenue. Berkeley: University of California Press
Levi, Margaret. 1990. A Logic of Institutional Change. In The Limits of Rationality, edited by Karen Schweers Cook and Margaret Levi, 402–418. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Liao, Tim Futing. 1994. Interpreting Probability Models: Logit, Probit, and Other Generalized Linear Models. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
Lijphart, Arend. 1975. The Comparable-Cases Strategy in Comparative Research. Comparative Political Studies 8, 2 (July):158–177
Lodge, Juliet. 1987. The Single European Act and the New Legislative Cooperation Procedure: A Critical Analysis. Journal of European Integration 11, 1 (Fall):5–28
London, Caroline, and Michael Llamas. 1995. Protection of the Environment and the Free Movement of Goods. London: Butterworths
Long, J. Scott. 1997. Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
Lord Cockfield. 1994. The European Union: Creating the Single Market. London: Wiley Chancery Law
Lord Slynn of Hadley. 1993. Looking at European Community Texts. Statute Law Review 14, 1 (Summer):12–27
Lowndes, Vivien. 1996. Varieties of New Institutionalism: A Critical Appraisal. Public Administration 74 (Summer):181–197
Macrory, Richard. 1991. European Court Shakes Up Legal Basis of EEC Environmental Policy. ENDS Report 197 (June):15–16
Majone, Giandomenico. 1989. Evidence, Argument and Persuasion in the Policy Process. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press
Majone, Giandomenico. 1993. The European Community Between Social Policy and Social Regulation. Journal of Common Market Studies 31 (June):153–170
Mann, Michael. 1984. The Autonomous Power of the State: Its Origins, Mechanisms, and Results. Archives européennes de sociologie 25:185–213
March, James G., and Johan P. Olsen. 1989. Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics. New York: Basic Books
Marks, Gary, and Liesbet Hooghe. 2001. Multi-level Governance and European Integration. Boulder, CO: Rowman & Littlefield
Marks, Gary, Liesbet, Hooghe, and Kermit, Blank. 1996. European Integration from the 1980s: State-Centric v. Multi-Level Governance. Journal of Common Market Studies 34, 3 (September):341–377
Martin, Lisa L. 1993. International and Domestic Institutions in the Economic and Monetary Union Process. Economics and Politics 5, 2 (July):125–144
Matthews, R. C. O. 1986. The Economics of Institutions and the Sources of Growth. Economic Journal 96 (December):903–918
Mattila, Mikko, and Jan-Erik, Lane. 2001. Why Unanimity in the Council? A Roll Call Analysis of Council Voting. European Union Politics 2, 1:31–52
Mattli, Walter. 2001. Private Justice in a Global Economy: From Litigation to Arbitration. International Organization 55, 4 (Autumn):919–948
Mattli, Walter, and Anne-Marie, Slaughter. 1995. Law and Politics in the European Union: A Reply to Garrett. International Organization 49, 1 (Winter):183–190
Mattli, Walter, and Anne-Marie, Slaughter. 1998. Revisiting the European Court of Justice. International Organization 52, 1 (Winter):177–210
Maurer, Andreas. 2001. Democratic Governance in the European Union: The Institutional Terrain After Amsterdam. In The Treaty of Amsterdam: Challenges and Opportunities for the European Union, edited by Jörg Monar and Wolfgang Wessels. London: Continuum
Maurer, Andreas, Wolfgang Wessels, and Jürgen Mittag. 2000. Europeanisation in and of the European Union System: Trends, Offers, and Constraints. Paper for the DFG workshop “Linking European Union and National Governance,” Mannheim, Germany, 1–3 June
McCormick, John. 2001. Environmental Policy in the European Union. New York: Palgrave
McCown, Margaret. 2001. The Use of Judge-made Law in European Judicial Integration: Precedent‍based Arguments in European Union Inter‍institutional Disputes. Presented at the 7th Biennial Conference of the European Community Studies Association (ECSA), Madison, WI, 30 May–2 June 2001
McCown, Margaret. 2003. The European Parliament Before the Bench: ECJ Precedent and European Parliament Litigation Strategies. Journal of European Public Policy 10, 6 (December):974–995
McKelvey, Richard D. 1976. Intransitivities in Multidimensional Voting Models and Some Implications for Agenda Control. Journal of Economic Theory 12:472–482
McKelvey, Richard D., and Peter, C. Ordeshook. 1984. An Experimental Study of the Effects of Procedural Rules on Committee Behavior. Journal of Politics 46, 1 (February):182–205
McNiel, Dale E. 1998. The first case under the WTO's Sanitary and Phytosanitary Agreement: The European Union's Hormone Ban. Virginia Journal of International Law 39, 1 (Fall):89–134
Mearsheimer, John J. 1994/95. The False Promise of International Institutions. International Security 19, 3 (Winter):5–49
Mearsheimer, John J. 1995. A Realist Reply. International Security 20, 1 (Summer):82–93
Menard, Scott. 1995. Applied Logistic Regression Analysis. Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences Series, Number 07–106. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
Milas, René. 1985. La concurrence entre les bases légales des actes communautaires. Revue du Marché commun no. 289 (July–August):445–448
Milgrom, Paul R., Douglass, C. North, and Barry, R. Weingast. 1990. The Role of Institutions in the Revival of Trade: The Law Merchant, Private Judges, and the Champagne Fairs. Economics and Politics 2:1–23
Milgrom, Paul, and John Roberts. 1990. Bargaining Costs, Influence Costs, and the Organization of Economic Activity. In Perspectives on Positive Political Economy, edited by James E. Alt and Kenneth A. Shepsle, 57–89. New York: Cambridge University Press
Moberg, Axel. 2002. The Nice Treaty and Voting Rules in the Council. Journal of Common Market Studies 40 (2):259–282
Moe, Terry M. 1990a. Political Institutions: The Neglected Side of the Story. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 6 (Special Issue):213–266
Moe, Terry M. 1990b. The Politics of Structural Choice: Toward a Theory of Public Bureaucracy. In Organization Theory: From Chester Barnard to the Present and Beyond, edited by Oliver E. Williamson, 116–153. New York: Oxford University Press
Moravcsik, Andrew. 1991. Negotiating the Single European Act: National Interests and Conventional Statecraft in the European Community. International Organization 45 (Winter):19–56
Moravcsik, Andrew. 1993. Preferences and Power in the European Community: A Liberal Intergovernmentalist Approach. Journal of Common Market Studies 31, 4 (December):473–524
Moravcsik, Andrew. 1995. Liberal Intergovernmentalism and Integration: A Rejoinder. Journal of Common Market Studies 33, 4 (December):611–628
Moravcsik, Andrew. 1997. Taking Preferences Seriously: A Liberal Theory of International Politics. International Organization 51, 4 (Autumn):513–554
Moravcsik, Andrew. 1998. The Choice for Europe: Social Purpose and State Power from Messina to Maastricht. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press
Moravcsik, Andrew. 1999a. The Choice for Europe: Current Commentary and Future Research: A Response to James Caporaso, Fritz Scharpf, and Helen Wallace. Journal of European Public Policy 6, 1 (March):155–179
Moravcsik, Andrew. 1999b. The Future of European Integration Studies: Social Science or Social Theory?Millennium 28, 2:371–391
Moravcsik, Andrew, and Kalypso, Nicolaïdis. 1999. Explaining the Treaty of Amsterdam: Interests, Influence, and Institutions. Journal of Common Market Studies 37, 1 (March):59–85
Moser, Peter. 1996. The European Parliament as a Conditional Agenda Setter: What Are the Conditions?American Political Science Review 90:834–838
Moser, Peter. 1997a. A Theory of the Conditional Influence of the European Parliament in the Cooperation Procedure. Public Choice 91:333–350
Moser, Peter. 1997b. The Benefits of the Conciliation Procedure for the European Parliament: Comment to George Tsebelis. Aussenwirtschaft 52, 1/2:57–62
Moser, Peter. 1999. The Impact of Legislative Institutions on Public Policy: A Survey. European Journal of Political Economy 15:1–33
Müller, Wolfgang C., and Kaare Str⊘m, eds. 1999. Policy, Office or Votes? How Political Parties in Western Europe Make Hard Decisions. New York: Cambridge University Press
Nicoll, William. 1984. The Luxembourg Compromise. Journal of Common Market Studies 23, 1 (September):35–43
Nicoll, William. 1988. Le Dialogue Législatif entre le Parlement Européen et la Commission: La procédure de renvoi en commission du Parlement Européen. Revue du Marché Commun 316 (April):240–242
Niskanen, William A. 1971. Bureaucracy and Representative Government. Chicago: Aldine
North, Douglass C. 1981. Structure and Change in Economic History. New York: W. W. Norton
North, Douglass C. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance. New York: Cambridge University Press
North, Douglass C., and Robert Paul Thomas. 1973. The Rise of the Western World: A New Economic History. New York: Cambridge University Press
Oberschall, Anthony, and Eric, M. Leifer. 1986. Efficiency and Social Institutions: Uses and Misuses of Economic Reasoning in Sociology. Annual Review of Sociology 12:233–253
Oleszek, Walter J. 2001. Congressional Procedures and the Policy Process, 5th edition. Washington, DC: CQ Press
O'Neill, Michael. 1994. The Choice of Legal Basis: More Than a Number. Irish Journal of European Law 1:44–58
Ostrom, Elinor. 1990. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. New York: Cambridge University Press
Ostrom, Elinor. 1995. Constituting Social Capital and Collective Action. In Local Commons and Global Interdependence: Heterogeneity and Cooperation in Two Domains, edited by Robert O. Keohane and Elinor Ostrom, 125–160. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications
Pescatore, Pierre. 1987. Some Critical Remarks on the “Single European Act.”Common Market Law Review 24, 1 (Spring):9–18
Peter, Bertrand. 1994. La Base Juridique des Actes en Droit Communautaire. Revue du Marché commun et de l'Union Européenne no. 378 (May):324–333
Peters, B. Guy. 1991. Bureaucratic Politics and the Institutions of the European Community. In Euro-Politics: Institutions and Policymaking in the “New” European Community, edited by Alberta M. Sbragia, 75–122. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution
Peters, B. Guy. 1994. Agenda-setting in the European Community. Journal of European Public Policy 1, 1 (June):9–26
Pierson, Paul. 1996. The Path to European Integration: A Historical Institutionalist Analysis. Comparative Political Studies 29, 2 (April):123–163
Pierson, Paul. 2000a. Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics. American Political Science Review 94, 2 (June):251–268
Pierson, Paul. 2000b. The Limits of Design: Explaining Institutional Origins and Change. Governance 13, 4 (October):475–499
Pollack, Mark A. 1996. The New Institutionalism and EC Governance: The Promise and Limits of Institutional Analysis. Governance 9, 4 (October):429–458
Pollack, Mark A. 1997. Delegation, Agency, and Agenda Setting in the European Community. International Organization 51, 1 (Winter):99–134
Pollack, Mark A. 2003. The Engines of Integration: Delegation, Agency, and Agency Setting in the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Przeworski, Adam, and Henry Teune. 1970. The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry. New York: Wiley Interscience
Rasmussen, Anders. 2000. Institutional Games Rational Actors Play – The Empowering of the European Parliament. European Integration Online Papers 4 (1)
Rasmussen, Hjalte. 1986. On Law and Policy in the European Court of Justice. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff
Ray, Leonard. 1999. Measuring Party Orientations Towards European Integration: Results from an Expert Survey. European Journal of Political Research 36:283–306
Rehbinder, Eckard, and Richard Stewart. 1985. Integration Through Law, vol. 2, Environmental Protection Policy. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter
Rhodes, Martin. 1995. A Regulatory Conundrum: Industrial Relations and the Social Dimension. In European Social Policy: Between Fragmentation and Integration, edited by Stephan Leibfried and Paul Pierson, 78–122. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution
Riker, William H. 1980. Implications from the Disequilibrium of Majority Rule for the Study of Institutions. American Political Science Review 74:432–446
Riker, William H. 1983. Political Theory and the Art of Heresthetics. In Political Science: The State of the Discipline, edited by Ada W. Finifter, 47–67. Washington, DC: American Political Science Association
Riker, William H. 1984. The Heresthetics of Constitution-Making: The Presidency in 1787, with Comments on Determinism and Rational Choice. American Political Science Review 78, 1 (March):1–16
Rittberger, Berthold. 2003. The Creation and Empowerment of the European Parliament. Journal of Common Market Studies 41, 2 (April):203–225
Robinson, Jonathan. 1992. The Legal Basis of EC Environmental Law. Journal of Environmental Law 4, 1:109–120
Roselsky, Kurt M. 1993. Legal Basis and International Implications of Council Regulation on the Supervision and Control of Shipments of Hazardous Waste. Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law 23 (1):111–139
Sandholtz, Wayne. 1996. Membership Matters: Limits of the Functional Approach to European Institutions. Journal of Common Market Studies 34:403–429
Sbragia, Alberta. 1996. Environmental Policy: The “Push-Pull” of Policy-Making. In Policy-Making in the European Union, 3rd edition, edited by Helen Wallace and William Wallace, 235–255. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Scharpf, Fritz W. 1999. Selecting Cases and Testing Hypotheses. Journal of European Public Policy 6, 1 (March):164–168
Scharpf, Fritz W. 2000. Governing in Europe: Effective and Democratic? New York: Oxford University Press
Schattschneider, E. E. 1960. The Semisovereign People: A Realist's View of Democracy in America. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston
Schickler, Eric, and Andrew, Rich. 1997a. Controlling the Floor: Parties as Procedural Coalitions in the House. American Journal of Political Science 41:1340–1375
Schickler, Eric, and Andrew, Rich. 1997b. Party Government in the House Reconsidered: A Response to Cox and McCubbins. American Journal of Political Science 41:1387–1394
Schmidt, Alke. 1995. Trade in Waste Under Community Law. In Trade & The Environment: The Search for Balance, edited by James Cameron, Paul Demaret, and Damien Geradin, 184–203. London: Cameron May
Schneider, Gerald. 2001a. Comment on Hooghe. In The Rules of Integration: Institutionalist Approaches to the Study of Europe, edited by Mark Aspinwall and Gerald Schneider, 174–176. Manchester: Manchester University Press
Schneider, Gerald. 2001b. Ideas, Mad Cows, and European Integration: An Institutionalist Analysis of the Bovine spongiform encephalopathy Crisis. Paper presented at the conference “Institutionalism and the Study of the European Union,” University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 4–5 May
Schneider, Gerald, and Mark Aspinwall, eds. 2001. The Rules of Integration: Institutionalist Approaches to the Study of Europe. Manchester: Manchester University Press
Schotter, Andrew. 1981. The Economic Theory of Social Institutions. New York: Cambridge University Press
Schulz, Heiner, and Thomas, König. 2000. Institutional Reform and Decision-Making Efficiency in the European Union. American Journal of Political Science 44, 4 (October):653–666
Scully, Roger M. 1997a. The European Parliament and the Co-Decision Procedure: A Reassessment. Journal of Legislative Studies 3, 3 (Autumn 1997):58–73
Scully, Roger M. 1997b. The European Parliament and Co-Decision: A Rejoinder to Tsebelis and Garrett. Journal of Legislative Studies 3, 3 (Autumn 1997):93–103
Sebenius, James K. 1983. Negotiation Arithmetic: Adding and Subtracting Issues and Parties. International Organization 37, 2 (Spring): 281–316
Shepsle, Kenneth A. 1979. Institutional Arrangements and Equilibrium in Multidimensional Voting Models. American Journal of Political Science 23, 1 (February):27–59
Shepsle, Kenneth A. 1986. Institutional Equilibrium and Equilibrium Institutions. In Political Science: The Science of Politics, edited by Herbert F. Weisberg, 51–81. New York: Agathon Press
Shepsle, Kenneth A. 1989. Studying Institutions: Some Lessons from the Rational Choice Approach. Journal of Theoretical Politics 1:131–147
Shepsle, Kenneth A. 1993. Political Institutions and the New Institutional Economics. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 149 (1):347–350
Shepsle, Kenneth A., and Barry, R. Weingast. 1981. Political Preferences for the Pork Barrel: A Generalization. American Journal of Political Science 25, 1 (February):96–111
Shepsle, Kenneth A., and Barry, R. Weingast. 1984a. Uncovered Sets and Sophisticated Voting Outcomes with Implications for Agenda Institutions. American Journal of Political Science 28, 1 (February):49–74
Shepsle, Kenneth A., and Barry, R. Weingast. 1984b. When Do Rules of Procedure Matter?Journal of Politics 46, 1 (February 1984):206–221
Shepsle, Kenneth A., and Barry, R. Weingast. 1987. The Institutional Foundations of Committee Power. American Political Science Review 81:85–104
Shvetsova, Olga. Endogenous Selection of Institutions and Their Exogenous Effects. Constitutional Political Economy 14:191–212
Sinclair, Barbara. 1995. House Special Rules and the Institutional Design Controversy. In Positive Theories of Congressional Institutions, edited by Kenneth A. Shepsle and Barry R. Weingast, 235–252. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press
Skroback, Andrew Evans. 1994. Even a Sacred Cow Must Live in a Green Pasture: The Proximity Principle, Free Movement of Goods, and Regulation 259/93 on Transfrontier Waste Shipments Within the EC. Boston College International and Comparative Law Review 17, 1 (Winter):85–110
Snidal, Duncan. 1995. The Politics of Scope: Endogenous Actors, Heterogeneity, and Institutions. In Local Commons and Global Interdependence: Heterogeneity and Cooperation in Two Domains, edited by Robert O. Keohane and Elinor Ostrom, 47–70. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications
Snidal, Duncan. 1996. Political Economy and International Institutions. International Review of Law and Economics 16 (March):121–137
Sommer, Julia. 1994. Les déchets, de l'autosuffisance et de la libre circulation des marchandises. Revue du Marché commun et de l'Union européenne no. 377 (April):246–257
Somsen, Hans. 1992. Case Note C-300/89, Commission v. Council (Titanium dioxide). Common Market Law Review 29:140–151
Somsen, Hans. 1993. Case Note C-155/91, Commission v. Council. European Environmental Law Review 2, 5 (May):121–129
Sprinz, Detlef, and Tapani, Vaahtoranta. 1994. The Interest-based Explanation of International Environmental Policy. International Organization 48, 1 (Winter):77–106
Stacey, Jeffrey, and Rittberger, Berthold. 2003. Dynamics of Formal and Informal Institutional Change in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy 10, 6 (December):858–883
Steiger, Heinhard. 1977. Competence of the European Parliament for Environmental Policy. Berlin: Erich Schmidt Verlag
Steunenberg, Bernard. 1994. Decision Making Under Different Institutional Arrangements: Legislation by the European Community. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 150, 4 (December):642–669
Steunenberg, Bernard. 1997. Codecision and Its Reform: A Comparative Analysis of Decision Making Rules in the European Union. In Political Institutions and Public Policy: Perspectives on European Decision Making, edited by Bernard Steunenberg and Frans Van Vught, 205–229. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers
Steunenberg, Bernard. 1998. Constitutional Change in the European Union: Parliament's Impact on the Reform of the Codecision Procedure. Unpublished manuscript, University of Twente, 17 September
Steunenberg, Bernard, and Antoaneta Dimitrova. 1999. Interests, Legitimacy, and Constitutional Choice: The Extension of the Codecision Procedure in Amsterdam. Prepared for the workshop “Enlarging or Deepening: European Integration at the Crossroads” at the Joint Sessions of Workshops of the European Consortium for Political Research, Mannheim, Germany, 26–31 March
Steunenberg, Bernard, Dieter, Schmidtchen, and Christian, Koboldt. 1999. Strategic Power in the European Union: Evaluating the Distribution of Power in Policy Games. Journal of Theoretical Politics 11, 3 (July):339–366
Stone Sweet, Alec. 2000. Governing with Judges: Constitutional Politics in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Stone Sweet, Alec, Neil Fligstein, and Wayne Sandholtz. 2001. The Institutionalization of European Space. In The Institutionalization of Europe, edited by Alec Stone Sweet, Wayne Sandholtz, and Neil Fligstein, 1–28. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Strom, Gerald S. 1990. The Logic of Lawmaking: A Spatial Theory Approach. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press
Str⊘m, Kaare. 1998. Institutions and Strategy in Parliamentary Democracy: A Review Article. Legislative Studies Quarterly 23, 1 (February):127–143
Talbert, Jeffery C., Bryan, D. Jones, and Frank, R. Baumgartner. 1995. Nonlegislative Hearings and Policy Change in Congress. American Journal of Political Science 39, 2 (May):383–406
Teasdale, Anthony L. 1993. The Life and Death of the Luxembourg Compromise. Journal of Common Market Studies 31, 4 (December):567–579
Teitgen, Pierre-Henri, and Colette, Megret. 1981. La fumée de la cigarette dans la “zone grise” des compétences de la C. E. E. Revue Trimestrielle de Droit Européen 17:68–81
Thelen, Kathleen. 1999. Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Politics. Annual Review of Political Science 2:369–404
Tomz, Michael, Gary King, and Langche Zeng. 1999. RELOGIT: Rare Events Logistic Regression, version 1.1 for Stata. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University, 1 October. URL http://gking.harvard.edu/
Touscoz, Jean. 1973. L'action des communautés européennes en matière d'environnement. Revue trimestrielle de droit Européen 9:29–45
Tsebelis, George. 1990. Nested Games: Rational Choice in Comparative Politics. Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press
Tsebelis, George. 1994. The Power of the European Parliament as a Conditional Agenda Setter. American Political Science Review 88:128–142
Tsebelis, George. 1995. Conditional Agenda-Setting and Decision-Making Inside the European Parliament. Journal of Legislative Studies 1, 1 (Spring):65–93
Tsebelis, George. 1996. More on the European Parliament as a Conditional Agenda Setter: Response to Moser. American Political Science Review 90:839–844
Tsebelis, George. 1997. Maastricht and the Democratic Deficit. Aussenwirtschaft 52, 1/2:38–56
Tsebelis, George. 2002. Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
Tsebelis, George, and Geoffrey, Garrett. 1997. Agenda Setting, Vetoes and the European Union's Co-decision Procedure. Journal of Legislative Studies 3:74–92
Tsebelis, George, and Geoffrey, Garrett. 2000. Legislative Politics in the European Union. European Union Politics 1, 1:9–36
Tsebelis, George, and Geoffrey, Garrett. 2001. The Institutional Foundations of Intergovernmentalism and Supranationalism in the European Union. International Organization 55, 2 (Spring):357–390
Tsebelis, George, and Anastassios, Kalandrakis. 1999. The European Parliament and Environmental Legislation: The Case of Chemicals. European Journal of Political Research 36, 1 (August):119–154
Tsebelis, George, and Amie, Kreppel. 1998. The History of Conditional Agenda-setting in European Institutions. European Journal of Political Research 33, 1 (January):41–71
Tsebelis, George, and Jeannette Money. 1997. Bicameralism. New York: Cambridge University Press
Tsebelis, George, and Xenophon, Yataganas. 2002. Veto Players and Decision-making in the European Union After Nice: Policy Stability and Bureaucratic/Judicial Discretion. Journal of Common Market Studies 40, 2:283–307
Tsebelis, George, et al. 2002. Legislative Procedures in the European Union: An Empirical Analysis. British Journal of Political Science 31:573–599
Usher, John A. 1985. The Scope of Community Competence – Its Recognition and Enforcement. Journal of Common Market Studies 24:121–136
Usher, John A. 1988. The Gradual Widening of European Community Policy on the Basis of Articles 100 and 235 of the EEC Treaty. In Structure and Dimensions of European Community Policy, edited by Jürgen Schwarze and Henry G. Schermers. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft
Vandermeersch, Dirk. 1987. The Single European Act and the Environmental Policy of the European Economic Community. European Law Review 12:407–429
Varela, Diego. 1999. A Take-It-or-Leave-It Proposal with Incomplete Information: What Is Parliament's Share of the Pie Under Maastricht's Co-Decision? Presented at the 6th Biennial Conference of the European Community Studies Association, Pittsburgh, PA, 2–5 June
Varela, Diego. 2000. Legislative Powers: A Positive Theory with Evidence from the European Parliament, 1989–1999. Ph.D. Thesis, London School of Economics
Vasey, Martin. 1988. Decision-Making in the Agriculture Council and the “Luxembourg Compromise.”Common Market Law Review 25, 4 (Winter):725–732
Ventura, Sergio. 1967. Principes de droit agraire Communautaire. Brussels: Bruylant
Voigt, Stefan. 1999. Implicit Constitutional Change: Changing the Meaning of the Constitution Without Changing the Text of the Document. European Journal of Law and Economics 7, 3 (May):197–224
Volcansek, Mary L. 1992. The European Court of Justice: Supranational Policy-Making. West European Politics 15:109–121
Moltke, Konrad. 1977. The Legal Basis for Environmental Policy. Environmental Policy & Law 3:136–140
Wilmowsky, Peter. 1993. Waste Disposal in the Internal Market: The State of Play After the ECJ's Ruling on the Walloon Import Ban. Common Market Law Review 30:541–570
Wachsmann, Anne. 1993a. Case Note C-155/91, Commission v. Council. Common Market Law Review 30, 5 (October):1051–1065
Wachsmann, Anne. 1993b. Le contentieux de la base juridique dans la jurisprudence de la Cour. Europe (January):1–5
Weatherill, Stephen. 1995. Law and Integration in the European Union. Oxford: Clarendon Press
Weaver, R. Kent, and Bert A. Rockman. 1993. When and How Do Institutions Matter? In Do Institutions Matter? Government Capabilities in the United States and Abroad, edited by R. Kent Weaver and Bert A. Rockman, 445–461. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution
Weber, Katja. 1997. Institutional Choice in International Politics: A Glimpse at European Union Members' Industrial Policies. Paper presented at the 38th Annual Convention of the International Studies Association, 18–22 March, Toronto, Canada
Weingast, Barry R. 1979. A Rational Choice Perspective on Congressional Norms. American Journal of Political Science 23, 2 (May):245–262
Weingast, Barry R. 1998. Political Stability and Civil War: Institutions, Commitment, and American Democracy. In Analytic Narratives, by Robert Bates et al., 148–193. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
Weingast, Barry R., and William, J. Marshall. 1988. The Industrial Organization of Congress; or, Why Legislatures, Like Firms, Are Not Organized as Markets. Journal of Political Economy 96:132–163
Wendt, Alexander. 2001. Driving with the Rearview Mirror: On the Rational Science of Institutional Design. International Organization 55, 4 (Autumn):1019–1049
Wessels, Wolfgang. 1991. The EC Council: The Community's Decisionmaking Center. In The New European Community: Decisionmaking and Institutional Change, edited by Robert O. Keohane and Stanley Hoffmann, 133–154. Boulder, CO: Westview Press
Westlake, Martin. 1997. “Mad Cows and Englishmen” – The Institutional Consequences of the Bovine spongiform encephalopathy Crisis. Journal of Common Market Studies 35, Annual Review Supplement (September):11–36
Wheeler, Marina, and Marc, Pallemaerts. 1992. Legal Basis for Waste Management. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law 1, 2:175–176
Wilkinson, David. 1992. Maastricht and the Environment: The Implications for the EC's Environment Policy of the Treaty on European Union. Journal of Environmental Law 4:221–240
Williamson, Oliver E. 1975. Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications. New York: Free Press
Williamson, Oliver E. 1985. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting. New York: Free Press
Wincott, Daniel. 1995. Institutional Interaction and European Integration: Towards an Everyday Critique of Liberal Intergovernmentalism. Journal of Common Market Studies 33, 4 (December):597–609
Woolley, John T. 2000. Using Media-Based Data in Studies of Politics. American Journal of Political Science 44, 1 (January):156–173
Wright, Elisabethann. 1998. Can the European Parliament Punish European Commission Officials – Who Takes the Blame for the Bovine spongiform encephalopathy Mess?European Food Law Review 8 (March):39–45

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Book summary page views

Total views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between #date#. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.