Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-8zxtt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T01:31:35.658Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Forward into the Past: Productivity Retrogression in the Electric Generating Industry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 December 2009

Robert J. Gordon
Affiliation:
Northwestern University, Illinois
Get access

Summary

The worldwide slowdown in productivity growth since the early 1970s has continued to puzzle economists. The failure to identify any convincing single cause has led to a shift in research away from aggregate studies toward more detailed research at the industry level. Along with construction and mining, the electric utility industry is one of three U.S. industries that have suffered the sharpest deceleration of productivity growth and thus is a natural candidate for detailed study.

Three special advantages commend the electric utility industry for analysis. First, its output is unusually homogenous, thus minimizing the usual problem of errors in measuring output. Second, as a regulated industry, the production process of electric utility generation is documented in an unusually detailed body of micro data at the establishment level. Third, electric utilities should be a fertile ground to test several of the most prominent single-cause theories of the aggregate productivity slowdown, including those that emphasize the role of energy prices, capital accumulation, environmental regulation, and the “depletion” of technology.

This paper provides new estimates of factor demand equations for labor and fuel use at the establishment level for fossil-fueled steam-electric generating plants, using a data set that has been newly developed for this study. It attempts to link the results to three strands of literature that have developed largely in isolation, (1) the macro-oriented literature on the economy-wide productivity slowdown, (2) the industrial organization literature on public utility and environmental regulation, and (3) the econometric literature on production technology and factor demand in the electric utility industry.

Type
Chapter
Information
Productivity Growth, Inflation, and Unemployment
The Collected Essays of Robert J. Gordon
, pp. 172 - 218
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Atkinson, Scott E., and Halvorsen, Robert. “Parametric Efficiency Tests, Economies of Scale, and Input Demand in U.S. Electric Power Generation.” International Economic Review. October, 1984; vol. 25, pp. 647-62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baily, Martin N.Productivity and the Services of Capital and Labor.” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity. 1981; no. 1, pp. 1-50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barzel, Yoram. “The Production Function and Technical Change in the Steam-Power Industry.” Journal of Political Economy. April, 1964; vol. 72, pp. 133-50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruno, Michael, and Sachs, Jeffrey. The Economics of Worldwide Stagflation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1985
Bushe, Dennis M. “An Empirical Analysis of Production and Technology Using Heterogeneous Capital: Thermal Electric Power Generation.” Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. New York: New York University; October, 1981
Christensen, Laurits R., and Greene, William H.Economies of Scale in U.S. Electric Power Generation.” Journal of Political Economy. August, 1976; vol. 84, pp. 655-76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowing, Thomas G. “Technical Change in Steam Electric Generation: An Engineering Approach.” Unpublished Ph.D. thesis. University of California, Berkeley. 1970
Cowing, Thomas G.Technical Change and Scale Economies in an Engineering Production Function: The Case of Steam Electric Power.” Journal of Industrial Economics. December, 1974; vol. 23, pp. 135-52Google Scholar
Cowing, Thomas G Small, Jeffrey, and Stevenson, Rodney E. “Comparative Measures of Total Factor Productivity in the Regulated Sector: The Electric Utility Industry.” In Cowing and Stevenson. eds. Productivity Measurement in Regulated Industries. New York: Academic Press; 1981, pp. 162-77
Cowing, Thomas G. and Smith, Kerry V.The Estimation of a Production Technology: A Survey of Econometric Analyses of Steam-Electric Generation.” Land Economics. May, 1978; vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 156-86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowing, Thomas G and Stevenson, Rodney E., eds. Productivity Measurement in Regulated Industries. New York: Academic Press; 1981
Denison, Edward F. Trends in American Economic Growth, 1929-82. Washington: The Brookings Institution; 1985
Gollop, Frank M., and Roberts, Mark J. “The Sources of Economic Growth in the U.S. Electric Power Industry.” In Cowing and Stevenson, eds. Productivity Measurement in Regulated Industries. New York: Academic Press; 1981, pp. 107-43
Gollop, Frank M., and Roberts, Mark J.Environmental Regulations and Productivity Growth: The Case of Fossil-Fueled Electric Power Generation.” Journal of Political Economy. November, 1983; vol. 91, pp. 654-74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gollop, Frank M.Cost-minimizing Regulation of Sulfur Emissions: Regional Gains in Electric Power.” Review of Economics and Statistics. February, 1985; vol. 67, pp. 81-90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, Robert J. “Airline Costs and Managerial Efficiency.” In Transportation Economics. New York: Universities-National Bureau Conference Volume. 1965; pp. 61-92
Gordon, Robert J The Measurement of Durable Goods Prices. Chicago: University of Chicago Press for NBER; 1990
Hirsh, Richard F. Technology and Transformation in the American Electric Utility Industry. Cambridge, U. K.: Cambridge University Press; 1989
Jorgenson, Dale W.The Role of Energy in Productivity Growth.” The Energy Journal. July, 1984; vol. 5, pp. 11-25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joskow, Paul L. and Rose, Nancy L.The Effects of Technological Change, Experience, and Environmental Regulation on the Construction Cost of Coal-burning Generating Units.” Rand Journal of Economics. Spring 1985; vol. 16, pp. 1-27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joskow, Paul L. and Schmalensee, Richard. Markets for Power: An Analysis of Electric Utility Deregulation. Cambridge, MA.: The MIT Press; 1983
Kendrick, John W. Productivity Trends in the United States. Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press for NBER; 1961
Komiya, R.Technical Progress and the Production Function of the United States Steam Power Industry.” Review of Economics and Statistics. 1962; vol. 44, pp. 156-66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, F. T.Economies of Scale: Some Statistical Evidence.” Quarterly Journal of Economics. May, 1959; vol. 73, pp. 232-45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nerlove, Marc. “Returns to Scale in Electricity Supply.” In Christ, C. ed., Measurement in Economics. Stanford: Stanford University Press; 1963, pp. 167-98
Nordhaus, William D. “Policy Responses to the Productivity Slowdown.” The Decline in Productivity Growth, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston. 1980; Conference Series 22, pp. 147-72
Nordhaus, William D.Economic Policy in the Face of Declining Productivity Growth.” European Economic Review. May/June 1982; vol. 18, pp. 131-58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norsworthy, J. R., Harper, Michael J., and Kunze, Kent. “The Slowdown in Productivity Growth: Analysis of Some Contributing Factors.” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity. 1979; no. 2, pp. 387-432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pakes, Ariel. “On Group Effects and Errors in Variables in Aggregation.” Review of Economics and Statistics. February, 1983; vol. 65, pp. 168-73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rasche, Robert, and Tatom, John. “Energy Price Shocks, Aggregate Supply, and Monetary Policy: The Theory and the International Evidence.” In Brunner, Karl and Meltzer, Allan H. eds., Supply Shocks, Incentives, and National Wealth. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy. 1981; vol. 14, pp. 9-93
Rose, Nancy L. and Joskow, Paul L.The Diffusion of New Technologies: Evidence from the Electric Utility Industry.” RAND Journal of Economics. Autumn 1990; vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 354-73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmalensee, Richard, and Joskow, Paul L. “Estimated Parameters as Independent Variables: An Application to the Costs of Electric Generating Units.” MIT Sloan School of Management working paper. February, 1985; 1575-84
Weaver, Paul H.Behind the Great Scrubber Fracas.” Fortune. February, 1975; pp. 106-14Google Scholar
Wills, Hugh R.Estimation of a Vintage Capital Model for Electricity Generating.” Review of Economic Studies. October, 1978; vol. 45, no. 141, pp. 495-510CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×