McCullough, LB. Taking seriously the “what then?” question: an ethical framework for the responsible management of medical disasters. J Clin Ethics 2011; 21: 321–327.Google Scholar

Chervenak, FA, McCullough, LB. An ethical framework for the responsible management of pregnant patients in a medical disaster. J Clin Ethics 2011; 22: 20–24.Google Scholar

Brody, BA. Life and Death Decision Making. New York: Oxford University Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Brody, BA. Taking Issue: Pluralism and Casuistry in Bioethics. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Buchanan, A, Brock, DW, Daniels, D, Wikler, D. From Chance to Choice: Genetics and Justice. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

McCullough, LB, Coverdale, JH, Chervenak, FA. Argument-based ethics: a formal tool for critically appraising the normative medical ethics literature. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 191: 1097–1102.Google Scholar

McCullough, LB, Coverdale, JH, Chervenak, FA. Constructing a systematic review for argument-based clinical ethics literature: the example of concealed medications. J Med Philos 2007; 32: 65–76.Google Scholar

Gracia, D. Philosophy: ancient and contemporary approaches. In Sugarman, J, Sulmasy, DP, eds. Methods in Medical Ethics, 2nd ed. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2010: 55–72.Google Scholar

McCullough, LB. John Gregory and the Invention of Professional Medical Ethics and the Profession of Medicine. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer, 1998.Google Scholar

James, W. The Will to Believe and Other Essays in Popular Philosophy. The Floating Press, 2010. www.thefloatingpress.com. Originally published 1896.Google Scholar

Aristotle. Nicomachean Ethics. Crisp R, trans. and ed. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Baker, RB, McCullough, LB, eds. The Cambridge World History of Medical Ethics. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Jonsen, AR. The discourses of bioethics in the United States. In Baker, RB, McCullough, LB, eds. The Cambridge World History of Medical Ethics. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009: 477–485.Google Scholar

Boyd, K. The discourses of bioethics in the United Kingdom. In Baker, RB, McCullough, LB, eds. The Cambridge World History of Medical Ethics. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009: 486–489.Google Scholar

Baker, RB, McCullough, LB. What is the history of medical ethics? In Baker, RB, McCullough, LB, eds. The Cambridge World History of Medical Ethics. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009: 3–15.Google Scholar

Jonsen, AR. The Birth of Bioethics. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Beauchamp, TL, Childress, JF. Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 7th ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Percival, T. Medical Ethics; or, A Code of Institutes and Precepts, adapted to the Professional Conduct of Physicians and Surgeons. London: Johnson & Bickerstaff, 1803.Google Scholar

Hippocrates. Epidemics. In Jones WHS, trans., Hippocrates, vol. 1. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1923: 165.Google Scholar

Baker, RB, Burns, CR. Worthington Hooker. In Baker, RB, McCullough, LB, eds. The Cambridge World History of Medical Ethics. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009: 709.Google Scholar

Gregory, J. Lectures on the Duties and Qualifications of a Physician. London: W. Strahan and T. Cadell, 1772. Reprinted in McCullough LB, ed. John Gregory’s Writings on Medical Ethics and the Philosophy of Medicine. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic, 1998: 161–248.Google Scholar

Richardson, HS. Specifying norms as a way to resolve concrete ethical problems. Philos Public Aff 1990; 19: 270–310.Google Scholar

von Staden, H. “In a pure and holy way:” personal and professional conduct in the Hippocratic Oath. J Hist Med Allied Sci 1996; 51: 404–437.Google Scholar

Jouanna, J. Hippocrates, trans. DeBevoise MB. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Nutton, V. The discourses of European practitioners in the tradition of the Hippocratic texts. In Baker, RB, McCullough, LB, eds. The Cambridge World History of Medical Ethics. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009: 359–362.Google Scholar

Gãlvao-Sobrinho, CR. Hippocratic ideals, medical ethics, and the practice of medicine in the early middle ages: the legacy of the Hippocratic Oath. J Hist Med Allied Sci 1996; 51: 438–455.Google Scholar

Hoffmann, F. Medicus politicus; sive, regulae prudentiae secundum quas medicus juvenis studia sua & vitae rationem dirigere debet. Leiden, Philip Bonk, 1738. (The Politic Doctor, or Rules of Prudence according to which a Young Physician Should Direct his Studies and Reason of Life).Google Scholar

Baker, RB, McCullough, LB. The discourses of philosophical medical ethics. In Baker, RB, McCullough, LB, eds. The Cambridge World History of Medical Ethics. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009: 281–311.Google Scholar

Porter, D, Porter, R. Patient’s Progress: Doctors and Doctoring in Eighteenth Century England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Percival, T. The Works, Literary, Moral, and Medical of Thomas Percival, M.D. 4 vols. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2014. Originally published by J. Johnson, St.Paul’s Church-Yard, London, 1807.Google Scholar

Chervenak, FA, McCullough, LB, Brent, RL. The professional responsibility model of obstetric ethics: avoiding the perils of clashing rights. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011; 205: 315.e1–5.Google Scholar

McCullough, LB. The ethical concept of medicine as a profession: its origins in modern medical ethics and implications for physicians. In Kenny, N, Shelton, W, eds. Lost Virtue: Professional Character Development in Medical Education. New York: Elsevier, 2006: 17–27.Google Scholar

Plato. Republic. In Cooper, JM, Hutchinson, DS, eds. Plato Complete Works. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett, 1997: 971–1223.Google Scholar

Chervenak, FA, McCullough, LB. Healthcare justice and human rights in perinatal medicine. Semin Perinatol 2016; 40: 234–236.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ruddick, W, Wilcox, W. Operating on the fetus. Hastings Cent Rep 1982; 12: 10–14.Google Scholar

Audi, R. Intuition and its place in ethics. J Am Philos Assoc 2015; 1: 57–77.Google Scholar

International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. Available at www.figo.org/ (accessed March 1, 2019).Google Scholar

World Association of Perinatal Medicine. Available at www.wapm.info/ (accessed March 1, 2019).Google Scholar

International Academy of Perinatal Medicine. Available at https://iaperinatalmedicine.org/ (accessed March 1, 2019).Google Scholar

World Medical Association. Available at www.wma.net/ (accessed March 1, 2019).Google Scholar

World Health Organization. Available at www.who.int/ (accessed March 1, 2019).Google Scholar

FIGO Committee for the Ethical Aspects of Human Reproduction and Women’s Health. Professionalism in obstetric and gynecologic practice. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2017; 36: 249–251.Google Scholar

Gregory, J. Lectures on the duties and qualifications of a physician. London: W. Strahan and T. Cadell, 1772. Reprinted in McCullough LB, ed. John Gregory’s Writings on Medical Ethics and the Philosophy of Medicine. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic, 1998: 161–248.Google Scholar

McCullough, LB. John Gregory and the Invention of Professional Medical Ethics and the Profession of Medicine. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer, 1998.Google Scholar

Coulehan, J. On humility. Ann Intern Med 2010; 153: 200–201.Google Scholar

Faden, RR, Beauchamp, TL. A History and Theory of Informed Consent. New York: Oxford University Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Beauchamp, TL, Childress, JF. Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 7th ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Liley, AW: The fetus as personality. Austr N Zeal J Psych 1972; 6: 99–105.Google Scholar

Williams, JW, Hellman, LM, Pritchard, JA. Williams Obstetrics, 14th ed. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1971.Google Scholar

Harrison, MR, Golbus, MS, Filly, RA. Management of the fetus with a correctable congenital defect. JAMA 1981; 246: 774–777.Google Scholar

Harrison, MR, Adzick, NS. The fetus as a patient: surgical considerations. Ann Surg 1991; 213: 279–291.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Fletcher, JC. The fetus as a patient: ethical issues. JAMA 1981; 246: 772–773.Google Scholar

Harrison, MR, Golbus, MS, Filly, RA, eds. The Unborn Patient: Prenatal Diagnosis and Treatment. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1984.Google Scholar

Cunningham, FG, Leveno, KJ, Bloom, SL, et al. J Preface. In Cunningham, FG, Leveno, KJ, Bloom, SL, et al., eds. Williams Obstetrics, 25th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Education, 2018. Available at https://accessmedicine.mhmedical.com/content.aspx?bookid=1918&sectionid=185041505 (accessed March 1, 2019; may be behind paywall).Google Scholar

Cunningham, FG, Leveno, KJ, Bloom, SL, et al., eds. Williams Obstetrics, 25th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Education, 2018.Google Scholar

International Academy of Perinatal Medicine. Available at https://iaperinatalmedicine.org/ (accessed March 1, 2019).Google Scholar

Bianchi, D, Crombelhome, TM, D’Alton, ME. Fetology: Diagnosis and Management of the Fetal Patient. New York: McGraw-Hill Professional, 2000.Google Scholar

Bianchi, D, Crombelhome, TM, D’Alton, ME, Malone, F. Fetology: Diagnosis and Management of the Fetal Patient, 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Professional, 2010.Google Scholar

Harrison, M. The Unborn Patient: The Art and Science of Fetal Therapy, 3rd ed. New York: Saunders, 2001.Google Scholar

Adzick, NS. Prospects for fetal surgery. Early Hum Dev 2013; 89: 881–886.Google Scholar

Miller, NM, Smith, RP, Fisk, NM. The fetal patient. In Myers, LB, Bulich, L, eds. Anesthesia for Fetal Intervention and Surgery. Hamilton, Ontario, Canada: D.C. Decker, 2010: 1–16.Google Scholar

Cannio, M, Jani, J. Fetal magnetic resonance imaging. In Cody, AM, Brower, S, eds. Twining’s Textbook of Fetal Malformations, 3rd ed. London: Churchill Livingstone, 2015: 561–582.Google Scholar

Grady, D. To mend a birth defect, surgeons operate on the patient within a patient. New York Times, October 23, 2017. Available at www.nytimes.com/2017/10/23/health/fetal-surgery-spina-bifida.html (accessed March 1, 2019).Google Scholar

Chervenak, FA, McCullough, LB. Perinatal ethics: a practical method of analysis of obligations to mother and fetus. Obstet Gynecol 1985; 66: 442–446.Google ScholarPubMed

Porter, R, Teich, M, eds. The Enlightenment in National Context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981.Google Scholar

Kant, I. Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. Gregor M, Timmerman J, trans. and ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Chervenak, FA, McCullough, LB. Ethical issues in periviable birth. Semin Perinatol 2013; 37: 422–425.Google Scholar

Skupski, DW, Chervenak, FA, McCullough, LB, Bancalari, E, et al. Ethical dimensions of periviability. J Pertinat Med 2010; 38: 579–583.Google Scholar

Chervenak, FA, McCullough, LB, Levine, MI. An ethically justified, clinically comprehensive approach to periviability: gynaecologic, obstetric, perinatal, and neonatal dimensions. J Obstet Gyneacol 2007; 27: 3–7.Google Scholar

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. Obstetric Care consensus no. 6: Periviability. Obstet Gynecol 2017; 130: e187–e199.Google Scholar

Tyson, JE, Parikh, NA, Langer, J, et al. Intensive care for extreme prematurity – moving beyond gestational age. N Engl J Med 2008; 358: 1672–1681.Google Scholar

Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. NICHD Neonatal Research Network (NRN): Extremely preterm birth outcome data. Available at www1.nichd.nih.gov/epbo-calculator/Pages/epbo_case.aspx (accessed March 1, 2019).Google Scholar

Skupski, DW, McCullough, LB, Levene, M, Chervenak, FA. Improving obstetric estimation of outcomes of extremely premature neonates: an evolving challenge. J Perinat Med 2010; 38: 19–22.Google Scholar

Warren, MA. Moral Status: Obligations to Persons and other Living Things. New York: Oxford University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Strong, C. Moral status and the fetus: continuation of a dialogue. Am J Bioeth 2011; 11: 52–54.Google Scholar

Lyerly, AD, Mahowald, MB. Maternal-fetal surgery for the treatment of myelomeningocele. Clin Perinatol 2003; 30: 155–165.Google Scholar

Chervenak, FA, McCullough, LB, Brent, RL. The professional responsibility model of obstetric ethics: avoiding the perils of clashing rights. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011; 205: 315.e1–5.Google Scholar

Minkoff, H, Marshal, MF, Liashenko, J. The fetus and the “potential child,” and the ethical obligations of obstetricians. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 123: 1100–1103.Google Scholar

Annas, GJ. Protecting the liberty of pregnant patients. N Engl J Med 1987; 316: 1213–1214.Google Scholar

Högberg, U, Lynöe, N, Wulff, M. Cesarean by choice? Empirical study of public values. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2008; 87: 1301–1308.Google Scholar

Chervenak, FA, McCullough, LB. Justified limits on refusing intervention. Hastings Cent Rep 1991; 21: 12–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lyerly, AD, Little, MO, Faden, RR. A critique of the “fetus as a patient.’ Am J Bioeth 2006; 8: W42–W6.Google Scholar

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Committee on Ethics. Committee Opinion 664. Refusal of medically recommended treatment during pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2016; 127: e175–e1182.Google Scholar

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Committee Opinion No. 390. Ethical decision making in obstetrics and gynecology. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 110: 1479–1487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

American Academy of Pediatrics. Committee on Bioethics. Informed consent, parental permission, and assent in pediatric practice. Pediatrics 1995; 95: 314–317.Google Scholar

Katz, AL, Webb, SA. Committee on Bioethics. American Academy of Pediatrics. Informed consent in decision-making in pediatric practice. Pediatrics 2016; 138: pii: e20161485. doi:10.1542/peds.2016-1485.Google Scholar

Kon, AA. The shared decision-making continuum. JAMA 2010; 304: 903–904.Google Scholar

Lantos, JD. Ethical problems in decision making in the neonatal ICU. New Engl J Med 2018; 379: 1851–1860.Google Scholar

Lantos, JD, Lauderdale, DS. Preterm Babies, Fetal Patients, and Childbearing Choices. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2015.Google Scholar

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 439: Informed consent. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 114 (2 Pt 1): 401–408.Google Scholar

McCullough, LB, Coverdale, JH, Chervenak, FA. Ethical challenges of decision making with pregnant patients who have schizophrenia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 187: 696–702.Google Scholar

Coverdale, JH, Chervenak, FA, McCullough, LB, Bayer, T. Ethically justified, clinically comprehensive guidelines for the management of the depressed pregnant patient. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996; 171: 169–173.Google Scholar

White, BC. Competence to Consent. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Grisso, T, Appelbaum, PS. Assessing Competence to Consent to Treatment: A Guide for Physicians and Other Health Professionals. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Faden, RR, Beauchamp, TL. A History and Theory of Informed Consent. New York: Oxford University Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Beauchamp, TL, Childress, JF. Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 7th ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Whitney, SN, McGuire, AL, McCullough, LB. A typology of shared decision making, informed consent, and simple consent. Ann Intern Med 2003; 140: 54–59.Google Scholar

Schloendorff v. Society of New York Hospital, 211 N.Y. 125, 129–130 (1914).Google Scholar

Lombardo, PA. Phantom tumors and hysterical women: revising our view of the Schloendorff case. J Law Med Ethics 2005; 33: 791–801.Google Scholar

Chervenak, J, McCullough, LB, Chervenak, FA. Surgery without consent or miscommunication? A new look at a landmark legal case. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 212: 586–590.Google Scholar

Wear, S. Informed Consent: Patient Autonomy and Physician Beneficence within Clinical Medicine. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer, 1993.Google Scholar

Engel, GL. The need for a new medical model: a challenge for biomedicine. Science 1977; 196: 129–136.Google Scholar

McCullough, LB. The professional medical ethics model of decision making under conditions of uncertainty. Med Care Rev Res 2013; 70(1 Suppl): 141S–58S.Google Scholar

Kon, AA. The shared decision-making continuum. JAMA 2010; 304: 903–904.Google Scholar

Chervenak, FA, McCullough, LB. The unlimited rights model of obstetric ethics threatens professionalism: a commentary. BJOG 2017; 124: 1144–1147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ecker, J. Minkoff H. Home birth: what are physicians’ ethical obligations when patient choices may carry increased risk? Obstet Gynecol 2011; 117: 1179–1182.Google Scholar

McCullough, LB, Wilson, NL, Teasdale, TA, Kolpakchi, AL, Skelly, JR. Mapping personal, familial, and professional values in long-term care decisions. Gerontologist 1993; 33: 324–332.Google Scholar

Blumenthal-Barby, JS, Coverdale, JH, McCullough, LB. A typology and ethical considerations of methods of influence on decision making in patients with psychiatric disorders. Harv Rev Psychiatry 2013; 21: 275–279.Google Scholar

Coverdale, JH, McCullough, LB, Chervenak, FA, Bayer, T. Clinical implications and management strategies when depression occurs during pregnancy. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 1996; 36: 424–429.Google Scholar

Truman v. Thomas, 27 Cal.3d 285 (1980).Google Scholar

Chervenak, FA, McCullough, LB. Clinical guides to preventing ethical conflicts between pregnant women and their physicians. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 162: 303–307.Google Scholar

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Committee Opinion Number 617: End-of-life decision making. Obstet Gynecol 2015; 125: 261–267.Google Scholar

Drane, JF. Competency to give informed consent: a model for making clinical assessment. JAMA 1984; 252: 925–927.Google Scholar

Winston, ME, Winston, SM, Appelbaum, PS, Rhoden, N. Can a subject consent to a ‘Ulysses Contract’? Hastings Cent Rept 1982; 12: 26–28.Google Scholar

Spellecy, R. Reviving Ulysses contracts. Kennedy Inst Ethics J 2003; 13: 373–392.Google Scholar

McCullough, LB, Coverdale, JH, Chervenak, FA. Is pharmacologic research on pregnant women with psychoses ethically permissible? J Perinat Med 2015; 43: 439–444.Google Scholar

Leikin, S. Minors’ assent, consent, or dissent to medical treatment. J Pediatr 1983; 102: 169–176.Google Scholar

Leikin, S. Minors’ assent, consent, or dissent to medical research. IRB 1993; 15: 1–7.Google Scholar

American Academy of Pediatrics. Committee on Bioethics. Informed consent, parental permission, and assent in pediatric practice. Pediatrics 1995; 95: 314–317.Google Scholar

Katz, AL, Webb, SA. Committee on Bioethics. American Academy of Pediatrics. Informed consent in decision-making in pediatric practice. Pediatrics 2016; 138(2): e20161485.Google Scholar

Braun, UK, Naik, AD, McCullough, LB. Reconceptualizing the experience of surrogate decision making: reports vs genuine decisions. Ann Fam Med 2009; 7: 249–253.Google Scholar

Braun, UK, McCullough, LB, Beyth, RJ, Wray, NP, Kunik, ME, Morgan, RO. Racial and ethnic differences in the treatment of seriously ill patients: a comparison of African American, Caucasian, and Hispanic veterans. J Natl Med Assoc 2008; 100: 1041–1051.Google Scholar

Coverdale, JH, Bayer, TL, McCullough, LB, Chervenak, FA. Respecting the autonomy of chronic mentally ill women in decisions about contraception. Hosp Community Psychiatry 1993; 44: 671–674.Google Scholar

Coverdale, JH, McCullough, LB, Molinari, V, Workman, R. Ethically justified clinical strategies for promoting geriatric assent. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2006; 21: 151–157.Google Scholar

von Staden, H. “In a pure and holy way:” personal and professional conduct in the Hippocratic Oath. J Hist Med Allied Sci 1996; 51: 404–437.Google Scholar

Plato. Crito. In Cooper, JM, Hutchinson, DS, eds. Plato Complete Works. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett, 1997: 37–48.Google Scholar

McCullough, LB. John Gregory and the Invention of Professional Medical Ethics and the Profession of Medicine. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer, 1998.Google Scholar

Hoffmann, F. Medicus politicus; sive, regulae prudentiae secundum quas medicus juvenis studia sua & vitae rationem dirigere debet. (The Politic Doctor, or Rules of Prudence according to which a Young Physician Should Direct his Studies and Reason of Life). Leiden: Philip Bonk, 1738.Google Scholar

Gregory, J. Lectures on the Duties and Qualifications of a Physician. London: W. Strahan and T. Cadell, 1772. Reprinted in McCullough LB, ed. John Gregory’s Writings on Medical Ethics and the Philosophy of Medicine. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic, 1998: 161–248.Google Scholar

Pernick, MS. Bioethics and history. In Baker, RB, McCullough, LB, eds. The Cambridge World History of Medical Ethics. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009: 16–20.Google Scholar

Baker, RB. Before Bioethics: A History of American Medical Ethics from the Colonial Period to the Bioethics Revolution. New York: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Percival, T. Medical Ethics; or, A Code of Institutes and Precepts, adapted to the Professional Conduct of Physicians and Surgeons. London: Johnson & Bickerstaff, 1803.Google Scholar

World Medical Association. International Code of Medical Ethics. 1949. Available at www.wma.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/International-Code-of-Medical-Ethics-1949.pdf (accessed March 1, 2019).Google Scholar

British Medical Association. Medical ethics. Brit Med J Spec Suppl 1971; 3465: 143.Google Scholar

American Medical Association. Principles of Medical Ethics. 1957. In Baker, RB, Caplan, AL, Emanuel, LL, Latham, SR, eds. The American Medical Ethics Revolution: How the AMA’s Code of Ethics Has Transformed Physicians’ Relationships to Patients, Professionals, and Society. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1999: 356.Google Scholar

American Medical Association. AMA Principles of Medical Ethics. 2001. Available at www.ama-assn.org/sites/ama-assn.org/files/corp/media-browser/principles-of-medical-ethics.pdf (accessed March 1, 2019).Google Scholar

Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California, 17 Cal. 3d 425, 551 P.2d 334, 131 Cal. Rptr. 14 (Cal. 1976).Google Scholar

Jones, JW, McCullough, LB. Disclosure of intraoperative events. Surgery 2002; 132: 531–532.Google Scholar

American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. Confidentiality of medical information in the workplace. 2012. Available at www.acoem.org/Confidentiality_Medical_Information.aspx (accessed March 1, 2019).Google Scholar

Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990, Pub. L. No. 101–336, 104 Stat. 328 (1990).Google Scholar

Hudson, KL, Holohan, MK, Collins, FS. Keeping pace with the times – the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008. N Engl J Med 2008; 358: 2661–2663.Google Scholar

Annas, GJ, Roche, PW, Green, RC. GINA, genism, and civil rights. Bioethics 2008; 22: ii–iv.Google Scholar

Moran, C. Harris County Hospital District fires 16 over privacy. Houston Chron November 25, 2009. Available at www.chron.com/news/houston-texas/article/Harris-hospital-district-fires-16-over-privacy-1736905.php (accessed March 1, 2019).Google Scholar

McCullough, LB, Brothers, KB, Chung, WK, Joffe, S, et al. In behalf of the Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research (CSER) Consortium Pediatrics Working Group. Professionally responsible disclosure of genomic sequencing results in pediatric practice. Pediatrics 2015; 136: e974–982.Google Scholar

Wolf, SM, Branum, R, Koenig, BA, Petersen, GM, et al. Returning a research participant’s genomic results to relatives: analysis and recommendations. J Law Med Ethics 2015; 43: 440–463.Google Scholar

The American Society of Human Genetics Social Issues Subcommittee on Familial Disclosure. ASHG Statement. Professional disclosure of familial genetic information. Am J Human Genet 1998; 62: 474–483.Google Scholar

Lo, B, Dornbrand, L, Dubler, NN. HIPAA and patient care: the role of professional judgment. JAMA 2005; 293: 1766–1771.Google Scholar

Kipling, R. If: a father’s advice to his son. Available at www.goodreads.com/quotes/143729-if-you-can-keep-your-head-when-all-about-you (accessed March 1, 2019).Google Scholar

American Medical Association. Professionalism in the use of social media. N.d. Available at www.ama-assn.org/delivering-care/ethics/professionalism-use-social-media (accessed March 1, 2019).Google Scholar

Kind, T. In the literature: professional guidelines for social media use: a starting point. AMA J Ethics 2015; 17: 441–447.Google Scholar

Chervenak, FA, McCullough, LB, Hale, RW. Guild interests: an insidious threat to professionalism in obstetrics and gynecology. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2018; 219: 581–584.Google Scholar

Porter, D, Porter, R. Patient’s Progress: Doctors and Doctoring in Eighteenth Century England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Gregory, J. Lectures on the Duties and Qualifications of a Physician. London: W. Strahan and T. Cadell, 1772. In McCullough LB, ed. John Gregory’s Writings on Medical Ethics and the Philosophy of Medicine. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic, 1998: 161–248.Google Scholar

McCullough, LB. John Gregory and the Invention of Professional Medical Ethics and the Profession of Medicine. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer, 1998.Google Scholar

Percival, T. Medical Ethics; or, A Code of Institutes and Precepts, Adapted to the Professional Conduct of Physicians and Surgeons. London: Johnson & Bickerstaff, 1803.Google Scholar

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Committee Opinion No. 390. Ethical decision making in obstetrics and gynecology. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 110: 1479–1487.Google Scholar

National Academy of Medicine. Conflicts of Interest in Medical Research, Education, and Practice. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Hillman, BJ, Joseph, CA, Mabry, MR, et al. Frequency and costs of diagnostic imaging in office practice: a comparison of self-referring and radiologist-referring physicians. N Engl J Med 1990; 323: 1604–1608.Google Scholar

International Association for Medial Ultrasound. Practice parameters. Available at www.aium.org/resources/guidelines.aspx (accessed March 1, 2019).Google Scholar

Jain, C. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 723. Guidelines for diagnostic imaging during pregnancy and lactation. Obstet Gynecol 2019; 133: 186.Google Scholar

Choo, EK, Byington, CL, Johnson, NL, Jagsi, R. From #MeToo to #TimesUp in health care: can a culture of accountability end inequity and harassment? Lancet 2019; 393: 499–502.Google Scholar

Holroyd-Leduc, JM, Straus, SE. #MeToo and the medical profession. CMAJ 2018; 190: E972–E973.Google Scholar

Bayer, T, Coverdale, J, Chiang, E. A national survey of physicians’ behaviors regarding sexual contact with patients. South Med J 1996; 89: 977–982.Google Scholar

McCullough, LB, Chervenak, FA, Coverdale, J. Ethically justified guidelines for defining sexual boundaries between obstetrician-gynecologists and their patients. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996; 175: 496–500.Google Scholar

Johns Hopkins Hospital. Hospital agrees to pay $190 million over recording of pelvic exams. Available at www.nytimes.com/2014/07/22/us/johns-hopkins-settlement-190-million.html (accessed March 1, 2019).Google Scholar

‘Just the grossest thing’: Women recall interactions with U.S.C. doctor. Available at www.nytimes.com/2018/05/17/us/USC-gynecologist-young-women.html. Accessed March 1, 2019.Google Scholar

Anonymous. Our family secrets. Ann Intern Med 2015; 163: 321.Google Scholar

von Staden, H. “In a pure and holy way:” personal and professional conduct in the Hippocratic Oath. J Hist Med Allied Sci 1996; 51: 404–437.Google Scholar

Pernick, MS. Bioethics and history. In Baker, RB, McCullough, LB, eds. The Cambridge World History of Medical Ethics. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009: 16–20.Google Scholar

Hoffmann, F. Medicus politicus; sive, regulae prudentiae secundum quas medicus juvenis studia sua & vitae rationem dirigere debet. (The Politic Doctor, or Rules of Prudence according to which a Young Physician Should Direct his Studies and Reason of Life). Leiden: Philip Bonk, 1738.Google Scholar

Tong, R. Feminine and Feminist Ethics. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, 1993.Google Scholar

American Psychiatric Association. Principles of Medical Ethics with Annotations Especially Applicable to Psychiatry. 2013. Available at https://www.psychiatry.org/psychiatrists/practice/ethics (accessed March 1, 2019).Google Scholar

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 723. Sexual misconduct. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 110: 441–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Selective Service System. Conscientious objection and alternative service. Available at www.sss.gov/consobj (accessed March 1, 2019).Google Scholar

Chervenak, FA, McCullough, LB. Obstetric ethics and the abortion controversy. Am J Ethics Med 1994; 3: 3–6. https://www.psychiatry.org/psychiatrists/practice/ethics (accessed March 1, 2019).Google Scholar

Chervenak, FA, McCullough, LB. Reply (re: The ethics of direct and indirect referral for termination of pregnancy). Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008; 199: 232e1–3.26.Google Scholar

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Committee on Ethics. Committee Opinion Number 385. The limits of conscientious refusal in reproductive medicine. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 110: 1203–1208.Google Scholar

Planned Parenthood. Available at www.plannedparenthood.org/ (accessed March 1, 2019).Google Scholar

American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians and Gynecologists. AAPLOG response to the ACOG Ethics Committee Opinion #385, titled “The limits of conscientious refusal in reproductive medicine.” February 6, 2008. Available at www.consciencelaws.org/ethics/ethics079-004.aspx3. Accessed March 1, 2019.Google Scholar