Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nmvwc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-07T16:20:02.394Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Lordship and justice in the early English kingdom: Oswaldslow revisited

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2010

Wendy Davies
Affiliation:
University College London
Paul Fouracre
Affiliation:
Goldsmiths, University of London
Get access

Summary

One of Domesday Book's most celebrated pronouncements is that on the bishop of Worcester's liberty for the triple-hundred of Oswaldslow.

The Church of St Mary of Worcester has a Hundred, called ‘Oswaldslow’, in which belong 300 hides. From these the bishop of that church has, by an arrangement of ancient times, all render from jurisdiction and all customary dues there belonging to his demesne sustenance, both the king's service and his own, so that no sheriff can have any claim there, either in any plea or in any other case whatever. The whole shire testifies to this. (‘Ecclesia Sanctae Mariae de Wirecestre habet unum hundret quod vocatur Oswaldeslaw, in quo iacent ccc hidae. De quibus episcopus ipsius ecclesiae a constitutione antiquorum temporum habet omnes redditiones socharum et omnes consuetudines inibi pertinentes ad dominicum victum et regis servitium et suum ita ut nullus vicecomes ullam ibi habere possit querelam nee in aliquo placito nee in alia qualibet causa. Hoc attestatur totus comitatus.’)

The hide was the standard unit of assessment for taxation and other forms of service in eleventh-century England. The commissioners who surveyed William the Conqueror's new realm in 1086 are here declaring that, on the evidence of the county community, profits of justice, dues and sundry obligations that might otherwise have been owed to the king from a set of estates assessed at three hundred hides, and notionally consolidated into one of the eight ‘hundreds’ that formed the administrative subdivisions of the county, were paid instead to the bishop of Worcester; that the king's officers were excluded from exercising their normal judicial functions as regards the area involved; and that this had long been the position.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×