Proportionality and Judicial Activism Fundamental Rights Adjudication in Canada, Germany and South Africa
Book contents
- Proportionality and Judicial Activism
- Proportionality and Judicial Activism
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- 1 Judicial Review and the Correction of Political Market Failures
- 2 The Normative Debate on Balancing
- 3 Balancing and Judicial Legitimacy
- 4 Proportionality as a Doctrinal Construction
- 5 The Avoidance of Balancing
- 6 Rationalising Balancing
- Conclusion
- Book part
- Appendix A Coding of the Jurisprudence of the Canadian Supreme Court
- Appendix B Coding of the Jurisprudence of the German Federal Constitutional Court
- Appendix C Coding of the Jurisprudence of the South African Constitutional Court
- Bibliography
- Index
Appendix A - Coding of the Jurisprudence of the Canadian Supreme Court
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 March 2017
Book contents
- Proportionality and Judicial Activism
- Proportionality and Judicial Activism
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- 1 Judicial Review and the Correction of Political Market Failures
- 2 The Normative Debate on Balancing
- 3 Balancing and Judicial Legitimacy
- 4 Proportionality as a Doctrinal Construction
- 5 The Avoidance of Balancing
- 6 Rationalising Balancing
- Conclusion
- Book part
- Appendix A Coding of the Jurisprudence of the Canadian Supreme Court
- Appendix B Coding of the Jurisprudence of the German Federal Constitutional Court
- Appendix C Coding of the Jurisprudence of the South African Constitutional Court
- Bibliography
- Index
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Proportionality and Judicial ActivismFundamental Rights Adjudication in Canada, Germany and South Africa, pp. 193 - 196Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017