Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-5lx2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-28T16:27:44.979Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Robert J. Sternberg
Affiliation:
Oklahoma State University
Karin Sternberg
Affiliation:
Sternberg Consulting, LLC
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Psychologist's Companion
A Guide to Writing Scientific Papers for Students and Researchers
, pp. 331 - 336
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexander, J. E., & Tate, M. A. (1999). Web wisdom: How to evaluate and create information quality on the web. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
,American Psychological Association (2009). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Aron, A., Aron, E. N., & Coups, E. (2007). Statistics for the behavioral and social sciences. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Beebe-Center, J. G., Rogers, M. S., & O'Connell, D. N. (1955). Transmission of information about sucrose and saline solutions through the sense of taste. Journal of Psychology, 39, 157–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bem, D. J. (1967). Self-perception: An alternative interpretation of cognitive dissonance phenomena. Psychological Review, 74, 183–200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bem, D. J. (2000). Writing an empirical article. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), Guide to publishing in psychology journals (pp. 3–16). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Calfee, R. (2000). What does it all mean: The discussion. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), Guide to publishing in psychology journals (pp. 133–145). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, H. H. (1969). Linguistic processes in deductive reasoning. Psychological Review, 76, 387–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, H. H. (1974). Semantics and comprehension. In Sebeok, T. A. (Ed.), Current trends in linguistics: Vol. 12. Linguistics and adjacent arts and sciences (pp. 1291–1428). The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Clark, H. H., & Chase, W. (1972). On the process of comparing sentences against pictures. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 472–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cleveland, W. S. (1994). The elements of graphing data. Summit, NJ: Hobart Press.Google Scholar
Dietz-Uhler, B. (2002). The effectiveness of an exercise to critically examine information on the World Wide Web. Unpublished manuscript, Miami University.Google Scholar
Dowling, D. (2008). The wrong word dictionary. Victoria, BC, Canada: Castle Books.Google Scholar
Dymond, R. (1949). A scale for the measurement of empathic ability. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 13, 127–133.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dymond, R. (1950). Personality and empathy. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 14, 343–350.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ehrenberg, A. S. C. (1978). Data reduction: Analyzing and interpreting statistical data. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Ehrenberg, A. S. C. (1982). A primer in data reduction: An introductory statistics textbook. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Eisenberg, N. (2000). Writing a literature review. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), Guide to publishing psychology journals (pp. 17–34). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
,Federal Bureau of Investigation (2005). Crime in the United States [Electronic Version] from http://www.fbi.gov/ucr/05cius/data/table_05.html.
,Federal Bureau of Investigation (2006). Crime in the United States [Electronic Version] from http://www.fbi.gov/ucr/cius2006/data/table_05.html.
,Federal Bureau of Investigation (2007). Crime in the United States [Electronic Version] from http://www.fbi.gov/ucr/cius2007/data/table_05.html.
Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson.Google Scholar
Festinger, L., & Carlsmith, J. M. (1959). Cognitive consequences of forced compliance. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 58, 203–211.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garner, B. A. (2003). Garner's modern American usage. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Garner, W. R. (1953). An informational analysis of absolute judgments of loudness. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46, 373–380.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gravetter, F. J., & Wallnau, L. B. (2008). Statistics for the behavioral sciences. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Grigorenko, E. L. (2000). Doing data analyses and writing up their results: Selected tricks and artifices. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), Guide to publishing in psychology journals (pp. 98–120). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2009). Multivariate data analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Hake, H. W., & Garner, W. R. (1951). The effect of presenting various numbers of discrete steps on scale reading accuracy. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 42, 358–366.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harris, J. S., & Blake, R. H. (1976). Technical writing for social scientists. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.Google Scholar
Janis, I. L., & King, B. T. (1954). The influence of role-playing on opinion change. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 49, 211–218.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1971). Subjective probability: A judgment of representativeness. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 430–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Intuitive prediction: Biases and corrective procedures. Management Science, 12, 313–327.Google Scholar
Kaufman, E. L., Lord, M. W., Reese, R. W., & Volkmann, J. (1949). The discrimination of visual number. American Journal of Psychology, 62, 498–525.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kendall, P. C., Silk, J. S., & Chu, B. C. (2000). Introducing your research report: Writing the introduction. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), Guide to publishing in psychology journals (pp. 41–57). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Krantz, J. H., & Dalal, R. (2000). Validity of Web-based psychological research. In Birnbaum, M. H. (Ed.), Psychological experiments on the Internet (pp. 35–60). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Lubart, T. I., & Sternberg, R. J. (1995). An investment approach to creativity: Theory and data. In Smith, S. M., Ward, T. B., & Finke, R. A. (Eds.), The creative cognition approach (pp. 269–302). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
McGuire, W. J. (1997). Creative hypothesis generating in psychology. Annual Review of Psychology, 48, 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,Merriam-Webster's collegiate dictionary. (2005). (11th ed.). Springfield, MA: Merriam-Webster.
Milgram, S. (1974). Obedience to authority: An experimental view. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Piaget, J. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children (M. Cook, Trans.). New York: International Universities Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollack, I. (1952). The information of elementary auditory displays. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 24, 745–749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poulton, E. C. (1985). Geometric illusions in reading graphs. Perception and Psychophysics, 37, 543–548.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reips, U.-D. (2000). The Web experiment method: Advantages, disadvantages, and solutions. In Birnbaum, M. H. (Ed.), Psychological experiments on the Internet (pp. 89–120). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Reis, H. T. (2000). Writing effectively about design. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), Guide to publishing in psychology journals (pp. 81–97). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Salovey, P. (2000). Results that get results: Telling a good story. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), Guide to publishing in psychology journals (pp. 121–132). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, R. A. (2000). Documenting your scholarship: Citations and references. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), Guide to publishing in psychology journals (pp. 146–160). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (1980). Representation and process in linear syllogistic reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 119–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (1988a). Mental self-government: A theory of intellectual styles and their development. Human Development, 31(4), 197–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (1988b). The psychologist's companion (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (1997a). Successful intelligence. New York: Plume.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (1997b). Thinking styles. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (1998a). A balance theory of wisdom. Review of General Psychology, 2, 347–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (1998b). Love is a story. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.). (2000). Guide to publishing in psychology journals. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (2001). Why schools should teach for wisdom: The balance theory of wisdom in educational settings. Educational Psychologist, 36(4), 227–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (2002a). Smart people are not stupid, but they sure can be foolish: The imbalance theory of foolishness. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), Why smart people can be so stupid (pp. 232–242). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.). (2002b). The anatomy of impact. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.). (2002c). Psychologists defying the crowd. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (2003). A duplex theory of hate: Development and application to terrorism, massacres, and genocide. Review of General Psychology, 7(3), 299–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (2004). Why smart people can be so foolish. European Psychologist, 9 (3), 145–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (2005a). Foolishness. In Sternberg, R. J. & Jordan, J. (Eds.), Handbook of wisdom: Psychological perspectives (pp. 331–352). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (2005b). The theory of successful intelligence. Interamerican Journal of Psychology, 39(2), 189–202.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.). (2006). Reviewing scientific works in psychology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (2007). A systems model of leadership: WICS. American Psychologist, 62 (1), 34–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sternberg, R. J. (2008). The WICS approach to leadership: Stories of leadership and the structures and processes that support them. Leadership Quarterly, 19(3), 360–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., & Bower, G. H. (1974). Transfer in part–whole and whole–part free recall: A comparative evaluation of theories. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., & Dobson, D. M. (1987). Resolving interpersonal conflicts: An analysis of stylistic consistency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 794–812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., Hojjat, M., & Barnes, M. L. (2001). Empirical aspects of a theory of love as a story. European Journal of Personality, 15(3), 199–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1992). Buy low and sell high: An investment approach to creativity. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1(1), 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1995). Defying the crowd: Cultivating creativity in a culture of conformity. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., & the Rainbow Project Collaborators. (2006). The Rainbow Project: Enhancing the SAT through assessments of analytical, practical and creative skills. Intelligence, 34(4), 321–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., & Soriano, L. J. (1984). Styles of conflict resolution. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 115–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., & Sternberg, K. (2008). The nature of hate. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., & Tulving, E. (1977). The measurement of subjective organization in free recall. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 538–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., & Weil, E. M. (1980). An aptitude–strategy interaction in linear syllogistic reasoning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 226–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strunk, W., & White, E. B. (2008). The elements of style–50th anniversary edition. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Tabachnik, G. B., & Fidell, L. S. (2006). Using multivariate statistics. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Tesser, A. (2000). Theories and hypotheses. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), Guide to publishing in psychology journals (pp. 58–80). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tufte, E. R. (1983). The visual display of quantitative information. Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press.Google Scholar
Tufte, E. R. (2001). The visual display of quantitative information. Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press.Google Scholar
Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Tulving, E. (1966). Subjective organization and effects of repetition in multi-trial free-recall learning. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 5, 193–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tulving, E., & Madigan, S. A. (1970). Memory and verbal learning. In Mussen, P. H. & Rosenzweig, M. R. (Eds.), Annual review of psychology (Vol. 21, pp. 437–484). Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews.Google Scholar
Wagner, R. K. (2000). Rewriting the psychology paper. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), Guide to publishing in psychology journals (pp. 187–198). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wainer, H. (1984). How to display data badly. American Statistician, 38, 137–147.Google Scholar
Warren, M. G. (2000). Reading reviews, suffering rejection, and advocating for your paper. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), Guide to publishing in psychology journals (pp. 169–186). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
,Webster's third new international dictionary, unabridged. (2002). Springfield, MA: Merriam-Webster.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×