Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-thh2z Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-16T11:17:27.470Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
This chapter is part of a book that is no longer available to purchase from Cambridge Core

7 - The Psychologists as Expert Witnesses

Andreas Kapardis
Andreas Kapardis
Affiliation:
University of Cyprus
Get access

Summary

Any development in scientific thinking and techniques shall not be kept from the court. Moreover, such developments in scientific thinking should not be kept from the court because they remain at the stage of hypothesis.

Lord Justice Cage and Justices Cresswell and Field in R. v. Bowman, Court of Appeal (Criminal Division), 2006, EWCA Crim. 417.

Expert witnesses do not just appear out of the blue. They are recommended by a city's ‘old boy’ network over lunches, telephone calls and drinks. Or they are tried out by legal firms and insurance companies and, if successful, put on to their ‘panels’ of suitable experts.

(Ragg, 1995)

Greater numbers of expert witnesses are being permitted to testify on a broader base of subject matter than has hitherto been permitted.

(Freckelton and Selby, 2002:12).

INTRODUCTION

The earliest description of the role of expert evidence in common law courts is to be found in the case of Buckley v. Rice Thomas. in 1554 (Freckelton and Selby, 2005:21). Experts, in the form of medical doctors, appear to have first been called upon to advise judges at the Old Bailey 600 years ago, but it was not until around 1620 that a jury was furnished with expert testimony for the first time. By 1721 there was the first challenge to an expert witness (a surgeon) testifying for the prosecution by another expert testifying on behalf of the defendant (Landsman, 1995).

Type
Chapter
Information
Psychology and Law
A Critical Introduction
 , pp. 229 - 256
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×