Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-9q27g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T09:52:21.115Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 5 - Wisdom

Situational, Dispositional, or Both?

from Part I - Introduction to Wisdom Theory and Research

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 May 2022

By
Igor Grossmann
Edited by
Robert J. Sternberg  and
Judith Glück
Robert J. Sternberg
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
Judith Glück
Affiliation:
Universität Klagenfurt, Austria
Get access

Summary

Some people think wisdom is a stable and invariable individual disposition. Others view wisdom as deeply embedded in culture, experiences, and situations, and treat these features as mutually making up wisdom. What are the implications of each view for measurement, training, and the fundamental nature of wisdom itself? This chapter reviews evidence concerning the dispositional versus situational approaches to study wisdom. Even though main features of wisdom show some stability, there is also a profound and systematic variability in response to situational demands. By conceptualizing dispositions as a distribution of situation-specific responses, one can integrate dispositional and situational approaches to wisdom. Building on these insights, it is recommended to pay attention to contextual factors in measurement. Insight about contextual factors can also shed light on how to develop interventions for training wisdom.

Keywords

Dispositioncultureessentialismconstrualnaïve realismstate-traitmeasurementself-insightbias
Type
Chapter
Information
The Psychology of Wisdom
An Introduction
 , pp. 70 - 88
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ardelt, M. (2003). Empirical assessment of a three-dimensional wisdom scale. Research on Aging, 25(3), 275–324.Google Scholar
Baltes, P. B. and Smith, J. (2008). The fascination of wisdom: its nature, ontogeny, and function. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(1), 56–64.Google Scholar
Bangen, K. J., Meeks, T. W., and Jeste, D. V. (2013). Defining and assessing wisdom: a review of the literature. The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 21(12), 1254–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brienza, J. P. and Grossmann, I. (2017). Social class and wise reasoning about interpersonal conflicts across regions, persons and situations. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 284(1869), 20171870.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brienza, J. P., Kung, F. Y. H., Santos, H. C., Bobocel, D. R. R., and Grossmann, I. (2018). Wisdom, bias, and balance: toward a process-sensitive measurement of wisdom-related cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 115(6), 1093–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorfman, A., Moscovitch, D. A., Chopik, W. J., and Grossmann, I. (2021). None the wiser: year-long longitudinal study on effects of adversity on wisdom. European Journal of Personality. DOI:10.1177/08902070211014057CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleeson, W. (2001). Towards a structure and process integrated view of personality: traits as density distributions of state. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(6), 1011–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleeson, W. and Gallagher, P. (2009). The implications of Big Five standing for the distribution of trait manifestation in behavior: fifteen experience-sampling studies and a meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(6), 1097–114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fleeson, W. and Jayawickreme, E. (2015). Whole trait theory. Journal of Research in Personality, 56, 82–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glück, J. (2018). Measuring wisdom: existing approaches, continuing challenges, and new developments. The Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences, 73(8), 1393–403.Google Scholar
Glück, J., Bluck, S., Baron, J., and McAdams, D. P. (2005). The wisdom of experience: autobiographical narratives across adulthood. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 29(3), 197–208.Google Scholar
Griffin, D. W. and Ross, L. (1991). Subjective construal, social inference, and human misunderstanding. In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 24, 319–59.Google Scholar
Grossmann, I. (2017a). Wisdom in context. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(2), 233–57.Google Scholar
Grossmann, I. (2017b). Wisdom and how to cultivate it. European Psychologist, 22(4), 233–46.Google Scholar
Grossmann, I. and Kross, E. (2014). Exploring Solomon’s paradox: self-distancing eliminates the self-other asymmetry in wise reasoning about close relationships in younger and older adults. Psychological Science, 25(8), 1571–80.Google Scholar
Grossmann, I., Karasawa, M., Izumi, S. et al. (2012). Aging and wisdom: culture matters. Psychological Science, 23(10), 1059–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grossmann, I., Na, J., Varnum, M. E. W., Kitayama, S., and Nisbett, R. E. (2013). A route to well-being: intelligence versus wise reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142(3), 944–53.Google ScholarPubMed
Grossmann, I., Gerlach, T. M., and Denissen, J. J. A. (2016). Wise reasoning in the face of everyday life challenges. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7(7), 611–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossmann, I., Brienza, J. P., and Bobocel, D. R. (2017). Wise deliberation sustains cooperation. Nature Human Behaviour, 1(3), 0061.Google Scholar
Grossmann, I., Oakes, H., and Santos, H. C. (2019). Wise reasoning benefits from emodiversity, irrespective of emotional intensity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 148(5), 805–23.Google ScholarPubMed
Grossmann, I., Weststrate, N. M., Ardelt, M. et al. (2020). The science of wisdom in a polarized world: knowns and unknowns. Psychological Inquiry, 31(2), 103–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossmann, I., Dorfman, A., Oakes, H. et al. (2021). Training for wisdom: the distanced-self-reflection diary method. Psychological Science, 32(3), 381–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haslam, N., Bastian, B., and Bissett, M. (2004). Essentialist beliefs about personality and their implications. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(12), 1661–73.Google Scholar
Huynh, A. C., Yang, D. Y.-J., and Grossmann, I. (2016). The value of prospective reasoning for close relationships. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7(8), 893–902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kristjánsson, K. (2013). Virtues and Vices in Positive Psychology: A Philosophical Critique. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kross, E. and Grossmann, I. (2012). Boosting wisdom: distance from the self enhances wise reasoning, attitudes, and behavior. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141(1), 43–48.Google Scholar
Levenson, M. R., Jennings, P. A., Aldwin, C. M., and Shiraishi, R. W. (2005). Self-transcendence: conceptualization and measurement. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 60(2), 127–43.Google Scholar
Parker, K. I. (1992). Solomon as philosopher king? The nexus of law and wisdom in 1 Kings 1-11. Journal for the Study of the Old Testament, 17(53), 75–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, L. (2018). From the fundamental attribution error to the truly fundamental attribution error and beyond: my research journey. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(6), 750–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santos, H. C., Huynh, A. C., and Grossmann, I. (2017). Wisdom in a complex world: a situated account of wise reasoning and its development. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 11(10), Article e12341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwarz, N., Kahneman, D., and Xu, J. (2009). Global and episodic reports of hedonic experience. In Bell, R., Stafford, F. and Alwin, D., eds., Calendar and Time Diary: Methods in Life Course Research. Sage Publishing, pp. 157–74.Google Scholar
Staudinger, U. M. (2013). The need to distinguish personal from general wisdom: a short history and empirical evidence. In The Scientific Study of Personal Wisdom. Springer, pp. 3–19.Google Scholar
Staudinger, U. M. and Baltes, P. B. (1996). Interactive minds: a facilitative setting for wisdom-related performance? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(4), 746–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, M., Bates, G., and Webster, J. D. (2011). Comparing the psychometric properties of two measures of wisdom: predicting forgiveness and psychological well-being with the Self-Assessed Wisdom Scale (SAWS) and the Three-Dimensional Wisdom Scale (3D-WS). Experimental Aging Research, 37(2), 129–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thomas, M. L., Bangen, K. J., Palmer, B. W. et al. (2019). A new scale for assessing wisdom based on common domains and a neurobiological model: the San Diego Wisdom Scale (SD-WISE). Journal of Psychiatric Research, 108, 40–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varnum, M. E. W., Grossmann, I., Kitayama, S., and Nisbett, R. E. (2010). The origin of cultural differences in cognition: evidence for the social orientation hypothesis. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19(1), 9–13.Google Scholar
Webster, J. D. (2003). An exploratory analysis of a self-assessed wisdom scale. Journal of Adult Development, 10(1), 13–22.Google Scholar
Webster, J. D. (2007). Measuring the character strength of wisdom. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 65(2), 163–83.Google Scholar
Weststrate, N. M. and Glück, J. (2016). Wiser but not sadder, blissful but not ignorant: exploring the co-development of wisdom and well-being over time. In Robinson, M. and Eid, M., eds., The Happy Mind: Cognitive Contributions to Well-Being. Springer International Publishing/Springer Nature, pp. 459–80.Google Scholar
Weststrate, N. M. and Glück, J. (2017). Hard-earned wisdom: exploratory processing of difficult life experience is positively associated with wisdom. Developmental Psychology, 53(4), 800–14.Google Scholar
Weststrate, N. M., Ferrari, M., and Ardelt, M. (2016). The many faces of wisdom: an investigation of cultural-historical wisdom exemplars reveals practical, philosophical, and benevolent prototypes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42(5), 662–76.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×