Book contents
- Quality Management in Intensive CareA Practical Guide
- Quality Management in Intensive Care
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Introduction
- Section 1 Quality management of patient care
- Section 2 Quality management of the ICU
- Section 3 Quality management on the national (and international) level
- 25 National ICU registries
- 26 Quality indicators
- 27 Benchmarking
- 28 Volume and outcome
- 29 Competence-based training and education
- 30 Applications of telemedicine in the intensive care unit
- Epilogue
- Index
- References
25 - National ICU registries
from Section 3 - Quality management on the national (and international) level
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 February 2016
Book contents
- Quality Management in Intensive CareA Practical Guide
- Quality Management in Intensive Care
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Introduction
- Section 1 Quality management of patient care
- Section 2 Quality management of the ICU
- Section 3 Quality management on the national (and international) level
- 25 National ICU registries
- 26 Quality indicators
- 27 Benchmarking
- 28 Volume and outcome
- 29 Competence-based training and education
- 30 Applications of telemedicine in the intensive care unit
- Epilogue
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Quality Management in Intensive CareA Practical Guide, pp. 195 - 203Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2016
References
Connors, A.F. Jr, Speroff, T., Dawson, N.V., et al. The effectiveness of right heart catheterization in the initial care of critically ill patients: SUPPORT Investigators. JAMA 1996; 276: 889–897.Google Scholar
Goldfrad, C., Rowan, K.. Consequences of discharges from intensive care at night. Lancet 2000; 355: 1138–1142.Google Scholar
Norlander, O.P., Bjork, V.O., Crafoord, C., et al. Controlled ventilation in medical practice. Anaesthesia 1961; 16: 285–307.Google Scholar
Swedish Intensive Care Registry. Intensive care registries. 2015. www.icuregswe.org/registries (accessed 30 September 2015).Google Scholar
Reineck, L.A., Le, T.Q., Seymour, C.W., et al. The impact of publicly reporting intensive care unit (ICU) in-hospital mortality on ICU case-mix and outcomes. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2015; 12: 57–63.Google Scholar
Sirio, C.A., Shepardson, L.B., Rotondi, A.J., et al. Community-wide assessment of intensive care outcomes using a physiologically based prognostic measure: implications for critical care delivery from Cleveland Health Quality Choice. Chest 1999; 115: 793–801.Google Scholar
California Intensive Care Outcomes project (CALICO). 2007. www.oshpd.ca.gov/HID/Products/PatDischargeData/ICUDataCALICO/CALICO_05-07.pdf (accessed 30 September 2015).Google Scholar
Neuhauser, D., Harper, D.L.. Too good to last: did Cleveland Health Quality Choice leave a legacy and lessons to be learned? Qual Saf Health Care 2002; 11: 202–203.Google Scholar
Rhodes, A., Ferdinande, P., Flaatten, H., et al. The variability of critical care bed numbers in Europe. Intensive Care Med 2012; 38: 1647–1653.Google Scholar
Black, N., Payne, M.. Directory of clinical databases: improving and promoting their use. Qual Saf Health Care 2003; 12: 348–352.Google Scholar
Harrison, D.A., Brady, A.R., Rowan, K.. Case mix, outcome and length of stay for admissions to adult, general critical care units in England, Wales and Northern Ireland: the Intensive Care National Audit & Research Centre Case Mix Programme Database. Crit Care 2004; 8: R99–111.Google Scholar
Reinikainen, M., Mussalo, P., Hovilehto, S., et al. Association of automated data collection and data completeness with outcomes of intensive care: a new customised model for outcome prediction. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2012; 56: 1114–1122.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed