Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
  • Cited by 5
Publisher:
Cambridge University Press
Online publication date:
July 2023
Print publication year:
2023
Online ISBN:
9781009327541

Book description

The characteristic – Planck – energy scale of quantum gravity makes experimental access to the relevant physics apparently impossible. Nevertheless, low energy experiments linking gravity and the quantum have been undertaken: the Page and Geilker quantum Cavendish experiment, and the Colella-Overhauser-Werner neutron interferometry experiment, for instance. However, neither probes states in which gravity remains in a coherent quantum superposition, unlike – it is claimed – recent proposals. In essence, if two initially unentangled subsystems interacting solely via gravity become entangled, then theorems of quantum mechanics show that gravity cannot be a classical subsystem. There are formidable challenges to such an experiment, but remarkably, tabletop technology into the gravity of very small bodies has advanced to the point that such an experiment might be feasible in the near future. This Element explains the proposal and what it aims to show, highlighting the important ways in which its interpretation is theory-laden.

References

Adlam, E. (2022), “Tabletop experiments for quantum gravity are also tests of the interpretation of quantum mechanics,” Foundations of Physics 52(5), 115.
Altamirano, N., Corona-Ugalde, P., Mann, R. B. and Zych, M. (2018), “Gravity is not a pairwise local classical channel,” Classical and Quantum Gravity 35(14), 145005.
Amelino-Camelia, G. (2013), “Quantum-spacetime phenomenology,” Living Reviews in Relativity 16(1), 1137.
Anastopoulos, C. and Hu, B. L. (2014), “Problems with the Newton–Schrödinger equations,” New Journal of Physics 16(8), 085007.
Anastopoulos, C. and Hu, B. L. (2015), “Probing a gravitational cat state,” Classical and Quantum Gravity 32(16), 165022.
Anastopoulos, C. and Hu, B. L. (2018), “Comment on ‘a spin entanglement witness for quantum gravity’ and on ‘gravitationally induced entanglement between two massive particles is sufficient evidence of quantum effects in gravity,’ ” arXiv preprint arXiv:1804.11315.
Anastopoulos, C. and Hu, B. L. (2022), “Gravity, quantum fields and quantum information: Problems with classical channel and stochastic theories,” Entropy 24(4), 490.
Anastopoulos, C., Lagouvardos, M. and Savvidou, N. (2021), “Gravitational effects in macroscopic quantum systems: A first-principles analysis,” Classical and Quantum Gravity 38(15), 28.
Anderl, S. (2018), “Simplicity and simplification in astrophysical modeling,” Philosophy of Science 85(5), 819831.
Ávila, P., Okon, E., Sudarsky, D. and Wiedemann, M. (2022), “Quantum spatial superpositions and the possibility of superluminal signaling,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.01190.
Ballentine, L. E. (1982), “Comment on ‘indirect evidence for quantum gravity,’ ” Physical Review Letters 48(7), 522.
Beauchemin, P.-H. (2020), “Signature-based model-independent searches at the large hadron collider: An experimental strategy aiming at safeness in a theory-dependent way,” Philosophy of Science 87(5), 12341245.
Belenchia, A., Wald, R. M., Giacomini, F. et al. (2018), “Quantum superposition of massive objects and the quantization of gravity,” Physical Review D 98(12), 126009.
Berry, M. (1982), “Wavelength-independent fringe spacing in rainbows from falling neutrons,” Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General 15(8), L385.
Bohm, D., Hiley, B. J. and Kaloyerou, P. N. (1987), “An ontological basis for the quantum theory,” Physics Reports 144(6), 321375.
Bose, S., Mazumdar, A., Morley, G. W. et al. (2017), “Spin entanglement witness for quantum gravity,” Physical Review Letters 119(24), 240401.
Bose, S., Mazumdar, A., Schut, M. and Toroš, M. (2022), “Two mechanisms for quantum natured gravitons to entangle masses,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2201.03583.
Brown, H. R. (1996), ‘Bovine metaphysics: Remarks on the significance of the gravitational phase effect in quantum mechanicsClifton, R., ed., in Perspectives on quantum reality, Springer, pp. 183193.
Burgess, C. P. (2004), “Quantum gravity in everyday life: General relativity as an effective field theory,” Living Reviews in Relativity 7(1), 156.
Carney, D., Stamp, P. C. and Taylor, J. M. (2019), “Tabletop experiments for quantum gravity: A user’s manual,” Classical and Quantum Gravity 36(3), 034001.
Chen, L.-Q., Giacomini, F. and Rovelli, C. (2022), “Quantum states of fields for quantum split sources,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.10592.
Christian, J. (1997), “Exactly soluble sector of quantum gravity,” Physical Review D 56(8), 4844.
Christodoulou, M., Di Biagio, A., Aspelmeyer, M. et al. (2022), “Locally mediated entanglement through gravity from first principles,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.03368.
Christodoulou, M., Di Biagio, A., Howl, R. and Rovelli, C. (2022), “Gravity entanglement, quantum reference systems, degrees of freedom,” Classical and Quantum Gravity.
Christodoulou, M. and Rovelli, C. (2019), “On the possibility of laboratory evidence for quantum superposition of geometries,” Physics Letters B 792, 6468.
Colella, R., Overhauser, A. W. and Werner, S. A. (1975), “Observation of gravitationally induced quantum interference,” Physical Review Letters 34(23), 1472.
Crowther, K. and Linnemann, N. (2019), “Renormalizability, fundamentality, and a final theory: The role of UV-completion in the search for quantum gravity,” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 70(2), 377406.
Crowther, K., Linnemann, N. and Wüthrich, C. (2021), “What we cannot learn from analogue experiments,” Synthese 198(16), 37013726.
Danielson, D. L., Satishchandran, G. and Wald, R. M. (2022), “Gravitationally mediated entanglement: Newtonian field versus gravitons,” Physical Review D 105(8), 086001.
Dardashti, R., Thébault, K. P. Y. and Winsberg, E. (2017), “Confirmation via analogue simulation: What dumb holes could tell us about gravity,” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 68(1), 5589.
Dawid, R. (2013), String theory and the scientific method, Cambridge University Press.
Deutsch, D. and Marletto, C. (2015), “Constructor theory of information,” Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 471(2174), 20140540.
Diósi, L. (1989), “Models for universal reduction of macroscopic quantum fluctuations,” Physical Review A 40(3), 1165.
Dürr, D., Goldstein, S. and Zanghi, N. (1992), “Quantum mechanics, randomness, and deterministic reality,” Physics Letters A 172(1–2), 612.
Ehlers, J. (2019), “Republication of: On the Newtonian limit of Einstein’s theory of gravitation,” General Relativity and Gravitation 51(12), 120.
Elder, J. (2022), “On the ‘direct detection’ of gravitational waves,” PhilSci-Archive preprint: philsci-archive.pitt.edu/21944/.
Fragkos, V., Kopp, M. and Pikovski, I. (2022), “On inference of quantization from gravitationally induced entanglement,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.00558.
Franklin, A. D. (2017), “Is seeing believing?: Observation in physics,” Physics in Perspective 19(4), 321423.
Galley, T. D., Giacomini, F. and Selby, J. H. (2022), “A no-go theorem on the nature of the gravitational field beyond quantum theory,” Quantum 6, 779.
Ghirardi, G. C., Rimini, A. and Weber, T. (1986), “Unified dynamics for microscopic and macroscopic systems,” Physical review D 34(2), 470.
Greenberger, D. M. and Overhauser, A. (1979), “Coherence effects in neutron diffraction and gravity experiments,” Reviews of Modern Physics 51(1), 43.
Greenberger, D. M. and Overhauser, A. W. (1980), “The role of gravity in quantum theory,” Scientific American 242(5), 6677.
Großardt, A. (2021), “Comment on ‘do Gedankenexperiments compel quantization of gravity,’ ” arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.14666.
Gueguen, M. (2020), “On robustness in cosmological simulations,” Philosophy of Science 87(5), 11971208.
Hacking, I. (1984), “Experimentation and scientific realism.” Tauber, A. I., ed., in Science and the Quest for Reality, Springer, pp. 162181.
Hacking, I. (1988), “Philosophers of experiment,” in PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, Vol. 1988, Cambridge University Press, pp. 147156.
Hacking, I. (1992), “The self-vindication of the laboratory sciences,” in Pickering, A., ed., Science as Practice and Culture, Chicago University Press, pp. 2964.
Haine, S. A. (2021), “Searching for signatures of quantum gravity in quantum gases,” New Journal of Physics 23(3), 033020.
Hall, M. J. and Reginatto, M. (2018), “On two recent proposals for witnessing nonclassical gravity,” Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 51(8), 085303.
Hartle, J. B. and Horowitz, G. T. (1981), “Ground-state expectation value of the metric in the 1/N or semiclassical approximation to quantum gravity,” Physical Review D 24(2), 257.
Hesse, M. B. (2005), Forces and fields: The concept of action at a distance in the history of physics, Courier Corporation.
Hossenfelder, S. (2013), “Minimal length scale scenarios for quantum gravity,” Living Reviews in Relativity 16(1), 190.
Howl, R., Vedral, V., Naik, D. et al. (2021), “Non-gaussianity as a signature of a quantum theory of gravity,” PRX Quantum 2(1), 010325.
Hu, B. L. and Verdaguer, E. (2020), Semiclassical and stochastic gravity: Quantum field effects on curved spacetime, Cambridge University Press.
Hu, B. L. and Verdaguer, E. (2008), “Stochastic gravity: Theory and applications,” Living Reviews in Relativity 11(1), 1112.
Huggett, N. and Callender, C. (2001), “Why quantize gravity (or any other field for that matter)?,” Philosophy of Science 68(S3), S382S394.
Huggett, N. and Wüthrich, C. (2020), “Out of nowhere: The ‘emergence’ of spacetime in string theory,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.10943.
Jacobson, T. (1995), “Thermodynamics of spacetime: The Einstein equation of state,” Physical Review Letters 75(7), 1260.
Kafri, D., Milburn, G. and Taylor, J. (2015), “Bounds on quantum communication via Newtonian gravity,” New Journal of Physics 17(1), 015006.
Kafri, D., Taylor, J. and Milburn, G. (2014), “A classical channel model for gravitational decoherence,” New Journal of Physics 16(6), 065020.
Karaca, K. (2017), “A case study in experimental exploration: Exploratory data selection at the large hadron collider,” Synthese 194(2), 333354.
Kleinert, H. (2016), Particles and quantum fields, World Scientific.
Kuhn, T. S. (1962), “The structure of scientific revolutions,” International Encyclopedia of Unified Science 2(2), XV172.
Kuhn, T. S. (1977 a), The essential tension, University of Chicago Press.
Kuhn, T. S. (1977 b), “Objectivity, value judgment, and theory choice,” in Arguing about science, pp. 7486.
Latour, B. (1987), Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society, Harvard University Press.
Lin, H. (2022), “Bayesian epistemology,” in Zalta, E. N. and Nodelman, U., eds., The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University.
Malament, D. B. (1995), “Is Newtonian cosmology really inconsistent?,” Philosophy of Science 62(4), 489510.
Malament, D. B. (2012), Topics in the foundations of general relativity and Newtonian gravitation theory, University of Chicago Press.
Mannheim, P. D. (1998), “Classical underpinnings of gravitationally induced quantum interference,” Physical Review A 57(2), 1260.
Marletto, C. and Vedral, V. (2017 a), “Gravitationally induced entanglement between two massive particles is sufficient evidence of quantum effects in gravity,” Physical Review Letters 119(24),240402.
Marletto, C. and Vedral, V. (2017 b), “Witnessing the quantumness of a system by observing only its classical features,” npj Quantum Information 3(1), 14.
Marletto, C. and Vedral, V. (2019), “Answers to a few questions regarding the bmv experiment,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.08994.
Marletto, C. and Vedral, V. (2020), “Witnessing nonclassicality beyond quantum theory,” Physical Review D 102(8), 086012.
Marshall, W., Simon, C., Penrose, R. and Bouwmeester, D. (2003), “Towards quantum superpositions of a mirror,” Physical Review Letters 91(13), 130401.
Marshman, R. J., Mazumdar, A. and Bose, S. (2020), “Locality and entanglement in table-top testing of the quantum nature of linearized gravity,” Physical Review A 101(5), 052110.
Misner, C. W., Thorne, K. S. and Wheeler, J. A. (1973), Gravitation, Macmillan.
Møller, C. (1962), “Les théories relativistes de la gravitation,” Colloques Internationaux CNRS 91(1), 1529.
Okon, E. and Callender, C. (2011), “Does quantum mechanics clash with the equivalence principle—and does it matter?,” European Journal for Philosophy of Science 1(1), 133145.
Overhauser, A. and Colella, R. (1974), “Experimental test of gravitationally induced quantum interference,” Physical Review Letters 33(20), 1237.
Padmanabhan, T. (2014), “General relativity from a thermodynamic perspective,” General Relativity and Gravitation 46(3), 160.
Page, D. N. and Geilker, C. (1981), “Indirect evidence for quantum gravity,” Physical Review Letters 47(14), 979.
Penrose, R. (1994), “Non-locality and objectivity in quantum state,” in Anandan, J. S., Safko, J. L., . eds., Quantum coherence and reality: In celebration of the 60th birthday of Yakir Aharonov-Proceedings of the International Conference On Fundamental Aspects of Quantum Theory. World Scientific, pp. 238246.
Pradeu, T., Lemoine, M., Khelfaoui, M. and Gingras, Y. (2021), “Philosophy in science: Can philosophers of science permeate through science and produce scientific knowledge?,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/715518.
Raju, S. (2022), “Failure of the split property in gravity and the information paradox,” Classical and Quantum Gravity 39(6), 064002.
Rosenfeld, L. (1963), “On quantization of fields,” Nuclear Physics 40, 353356.
Roura, A. and Verdaguer, E. (2008), “Cosmological perturbations from stochastic gravity,” Physics Review D 78, 064010.
Rovenchak, A. and Krynytskyi, Y. (2018), “Radiation of the electromagnetic field beyond the dipole approximation,” American Journal of Physics 86(10), 727732.
Rubino, G., Rozema, L. A., Feix, A. et al. (2017), “Experimental verification of an indefinite causal order,” Science Advances 3(3), e1602589.
Rydving, E., Aurell, E. and Pikovski, I. (2021), “Do Gedanken experiments compel quantization of gravity?,” Physical Review D 104(8), 086024.
Salecker, H. and Wigner, E. (1997), “Quantum limitations of the measurement of space-time distances,” Wightman, A. S., ed., in Part I: Particles and Fields. Part II: Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Springer, pp. 148154.
Thébault, K. P. (2016), “What can we learn from analogue experiments?,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1610.05028.
Vedral, V. (2006), “Witnessing quantum entanglement,” in Introduction to Quantum Information Science, Oxford University Press.
Visser, M. (2002), “Sakharov’s induced gravity: A modern perspective,” Modern Physics Letters A 17(15n17), 977991.
Wallace, D. (2022), “Quantum gravity at low energies,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 94, 3146.
Weatherall, J. O. (2014), “What is a singularity in geometrized Newtonian gravitation?,” Philosophy of Science 81(5), 10771089.
Weatherall, J. O. and Manchak, J. B. (2014), “The geometry of conventionality,” Philosophy of Science 81(2), 233247.
Zimmermann, F. (2018), “Future colliders for particle physics—‘big and small,’ ” Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment 909, 3337.

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Book summary page views

Total views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between #date#. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.