Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-qks25 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-14T08:38:27.394Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Introducing the Soviet Union

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2010

Get access

Summary

By 1949 the basic tasks were fixed and clearly defined. They entailed providing elementary schooling for everyone, higher education for the elite few, and intermediate secondary schooling – all in ways the economy could afford and society would accept. The historical foundations of the controversies surrounding these tasks were well established in China as elsewhere. The new ingredients in the early 1950s came from the Soviet Union as ally, advisor, and inspiration for socioeconomic revolution. One additional important difference between the early 1950s and the Yan'an decade was the nationwide scope of the CCP's power, which now encompassed not just an isolated rural hinterland but the cities, coastal areas, and the South as well.

Nevertheless, the pattern of development that emerged in Yan'an – regularization followed by an antithetical phase deliberately incorporating key elements from the old reformers’ critique – continued in sequence for at least 30 years thereafter. Counting the Yan'an decade, the same cycle was repeated three times, with a fourth regularization phase commencing after Mao's death in 1976.

The second cycle began in the early 1950s, when the Soviet Union replaced the West as authoritative reference point, and produced a regularization phase more rigorous than any recorded precedent. The 1958 Great Leap Forward broke out of that phase in search of a more rural-oriented “Chinese way,” with deregularization on a similarly unprecedented scale, citing among other things the mass-line lessons learned in Yan'an. The Soviet Union was dropped as an overt model but seemed to provide continuing “internal” reinforcement through a deregularization exercise of its own which occurred at the same time.

Type
Chapter
Information
Radicalism and Education Reform in 20th-Century China
The Search for an Ideal Development Model
, pp. 157 - 163
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×