Book contents
- Radioecology
- Cambridge Environmental Chemistry Series
- Radioecology
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Preface
- Acknowledgements
- 1 The Emergence of Radioecology
- 2 Stable and Unstable Atoms
- 3 Radionuclides and Other Sources of Radiation in the Natural Environment
- 4 Radionuclide Distributions and Their Value as Environmental Clocks and Tracers
- 5 The Accumulation of Radionuclides by Plants and Animals
- 6 Radiation Dosimetry and Biological Effects
- 7 Managing Environmental Radiation Exposures: Experiences and Challenges
- Index of nuclides
- Index
- References
5 - The Accumulation of Radionuclides by Plants and Animals
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 17 December 2021
Book contents
- Radioecology
- Cambridge Environmental Chemistry Series
- Radioecology
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Preface
- Acknowledgements
- 1 The Emergence of Radioecology
- 2 Stable and Unstable Atoms
- 3 Radionuclides and Other Sources of Radiation in the Natural Environment
- 4 Radionuclide Distributions and Their Value as Environmental Clocks and Tracers
- 5 The Accumulation of Radionuclides by Plants and Animals
- 6 Radiation Dosimetry and Biological Effects
- 7 Managing Environmental Radiation Exposures: Experiences and Challenges
- Index of nuclides
- Index
- References
Summary
Notwithstanding the seemingly large choice available, only about a couple of dozen elements appear to be consistently used to construct and operate the enormous diversity of biological organisms that still exist on our planet today. Indeed one is drawn to the ineluctable conclusion that all life on Earth must have a common origin, if only for the fact that just six elements (hydrogen, carbon, nitrogen, oxygen, phosphorus, and calcium) make up almost 99% of the mass of all living cells of both animals and plants. But many other elements account for the remainder. In terms of biochemistry, all these elements are the basis of four main classes of molecules: carbohydrates, lipids, proteins, and nucleic acids. Thus the majority of organisms all require the same essential elements, although there are nevertheless some interesting differences among them. Hence it seems that all animals require sodium, but some plants do not.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- RadioecologySources and Consequences of Ionising Radiation in the Environment, pp. 172 - 225Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021
References
ICRP. 1975. Report on the Task Group on Reference Man. ICRP Publication 23. Ottawa, ONT: International Commission on Radiological Protection.Google Scholar
ICRP. 1995. Basic Anatomical and Physiological Data for Use in Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 70. Ottawa, ONT: International Commission on Radiological Protection.Google Scholar
ICRP. 2002. Basic Anatomical and Physiological Data for Use in Radiological Protection: Reference Values. ICRP Publication 89. Ottawa, ONT: International Commission on Radiological Protection.Google Scholar
UNSCEAR. 1982. Report to the General Assembly. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
Reimann, C., Koller, R., Frengstad, B., Kasulina, G., Niskavaara, H., & Englmaier, P. 2001. Comparison of the element composition in several plant species and their substrate from a 1,500,000 km2 area in Northern Europe. Sci. Total Environ. 278: 87–112.Google Scholar
Pentreath, R. J. 1977. Radionuclides in marine fish. Oceanogr. Mar. Biol. Ann. Rev. 15: 365–460.Google Scholar
ICRP. 2002. Doses to the Embryo and Fetus from Intake of Radionuclides by the Mother. ICRP Publication 88. Ottawa, ONT: International Commission on Radiological Protection.Google Scholar
ICRP. 2002. Doses to Infants from Ingestion of Radionuclides in Mother’s Milk. ICRP Publication 95. Ottawa, ONT: International Commission on Radiological Protection.Google Scholar
ICRP. 1989. Age-Dependent Doses to Members of the Public from Intake of Radionuclides. Part 1. ICRP Publication 56. Ottawa, ONT: International Commission on Radiological Protection.Google Scholar
Jeffree, R. A., Oberhansli, F., Teyssie, J. L., & Fowler, S. W. 2015. Maternal transfer of radionuclides to eggs in a small shark. J. Environ. Radioact. 147: 1879–900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lacoue-Labarthe, T., Warnau, M., Oberhänsli, F., Teyssié, J-L., Jeffree, R., & Bustamente, P. 2008. First experiments on the maternal transfer of metals in the cuttlefish Sepia officinalis. Mar. Pollut Bull. 57: 826–31.Google Scholar
Morgan, F. 1964. The uptake of radioactivity by fish and shellfish. 1. 134-caesium by whole animals. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. UK. 44: 259–71.Google Scholar
Jefferies, D. F., & Hewett, C. J. 1971. The accumulation and excretion of radioactive caesium by the plaice (Pleuronectes platessa) and the thornback ray (Raia clavata). J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. UK. 51: 411–22.Google Scholar
Pentreath, R. J. 1975. Radiobiological studies with marine fish. In Design of Radiotracer Experiments in Marine Biological Systems. IAEA Technical Report Series, 167: 137–70.Google Scholar
Pentreath, R. J., & Jefferies, D. F. 1971. The uptake of radionuclides by I-group plaice (Pleuronectes platessa) off the Cumberland coast, Irish Sea. J. Mar. Biol, Assoc. UK. 51: 963–76.Google Scholar
Folsom, T. R., Young, D. R., & Sreekumaran, C. 1969. An estimate of the response rate of albacore tuna to cesium. In Nelson, D. J. & Evans, F. C., eds., Symposium on Radioecology, 337–45., USAEC, CONF-670503. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Kečkeš, S., Fowler, S. W., and Small, L. F. 1972. Flux of different forms of 106Ru through a zooplankter. Mar. Biol. 13: 94–9.Google Scholar
Bryan, G. W. 1966. The metabolism of Zn and 65Zn in crabs, lobsters and freshwater crayfish. In Aberg, B. & Hungate, F. P., , Symposium on Radioecological Concentration Processes, Stockholm, Sweden, 1005–16.Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Pentreath, R. J. 1973. The accumulation from water of 65Zn, 54Mn, 58Co and 59Fe by the mussel, Mytilus edulis. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. UK. 53: 127–43.Google Scholar
Bryan, G. W. 1961. The accumulation of radioactive caesium in crabs. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. UK. 41: 551–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potter, G. D., McIntyre, D. R., & Pomeroy, D. 1969. Transport of fallout radionuclides in the grass-to-milk food chain studied with a germanium lithium-drifted detector. In Nelson, D. J. & Evans, F. C., eds., Symposium on Radioecology, 597–608.USAEC, CONF-670503. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Crick, M. J., & Simmonds, J. R. 1984. Models for the transfer of radionuclides in cattle for use in radiological assessments. Sci. Total Environ. 35: 227–38.Google Scholar
Howard, B., Beresford, N. A., Barnett, C. L., & Fesenko, S. 2009. Transfer to animals. In Quantification of Radionuclide Transfer in Terrestrial and Freshwater Environments for Radiological Assessments. IAEA-TECDOC-1616, 267–307. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency.Google Scholar
Pentreath, R. J. 1975. Subcellular techniques in radioecological studies. In Design of Radiotracer Experiments in Marine Biological Systems. IAEA Technical Report Series, 167: 171–83.Google Scholar
Hansman, R. L., Metian, M., Pouil, S., Oberhänsli, F., Teyssié, J-L., & Swarzenski, P. W. 2018. A double-tracer isotope approach to assess simultaneous bioaccumulation of caesium in the olive flounder Paralichthys olivaceus. J. Environ. Rad. 190/191: 141–8.Google Scholar
Kanno, S., Yamawaki, M., Ishibashi, H., et al. 2012. Development of real-time radioisotope imaging system for plant nutrient uptake studies. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 367: 1501–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mahara, Y., Ohta, T., Ogawa, H., & Kumata, A. 2014. Atmospheric direct uptake and long-term fate of radiocesium in trees after the Fukushima nuclear accident. Sci. Rep. 4. 1–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, R. F. 1960. The accumulation of nitrosyl ruthenium by fine particles and marine organisms. Limnol. Oceanogr. 5: 312–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boisson, F., Hutchins, D. A., Fowler, S. W., Fisher, N. S., & Teyessie, J-L. 1997. Influence of temperature on the accumulation and retention of 11 radionuclides by marine alga Fucus vesiculosus. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 35: 313–27.Google Scholar
Pentreath, R. J. 1982. Principles, practice and problems in the monitoring of radioactive wastes disposed of into the marine environment. Nucl. Energy 21: 235–44.Google Scholar
Pentreath, R. J. 1981. The biological availability to marine organisms of transuranium and other long-lived nuclides. In Impacts of Radionuclide Releases into the Marine Environment, 241–272. IAEA-SM-248.Google Scholar
Pentreath, R. J. 1978. 237Pu experiments with the plaice, Pleuronectes platessa L. Mar. Biol. 48: 327–35.Google Scholar
Leonard, D. R. P., & Pentreath, R. J. 1981. Further 237Pu experiments with the plaice, Pleuronectes platessa: subcellular distribution of plutonium in the liver. Mar. Biol. 63: 67–71.Google Scholar
Swift, D. J. 1993. Laboratory experiments on the retention of 235Np by plaice (Pleuronectes platessa L.). J Environ. Rad. 21: 189–201.Google Scholar
Pentreath, R. J. 1981. The use of isotopic ratios in determining the relative biological availabilities of transuranium elements. In Techniques for Identifying Transuranic Speciation in Aquatic Environments, 141–149. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency.Google Scholar
Fowler, S. W., Carvalho, F. P., & Aston, S. R. 1986. Experimental studies on californium bioavailability to marine benthic invertebrates. J. Environ. Radioactiv. 3: 219–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, J. G., Leonard, D. R. P., & Lovett, M. B. 1986. Transfer of environmental plutonium across the human gut. Sci. Total Environ. 53: 89–109.Google Scholar
IAEA. 2001. Generic Models for Use in Assessing the Impact of Discharges of Radioactive Substances to the Environment. Safety Report Series, 19. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency.Google Scholar
Thomas, W. A. 1969. Cycling of 45Ca by dogwood trees. In Nelson, D. J. & Evans, F. C., eds., Symposium on Radioecology, 661–4.USAEC, Conf 670503. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Calmon, P., Thiry, Y., Zibold, G., Rantavaara, A., Fesenko, S., & Orlov, O. 2009. Radionuclide transfer in forest ecosystems. In Quantification of Radionuclide Transfer in Terrestrial and Freshwater Environments for Radiological Assessments. IAEA-TECDOC-1616, 333–80. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency.Google Scholar
Cline, J. F., & Rickard, W. H. 1973. Radioactive strontium and cesium in cultivated and abandoned field plots. In Nelson, D. J. ed., Radionuclides in Ecosystems, 209–211. USAEC CONF-710501-P1. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Reichle, D. E., Crossley, D. A., Edwards, C. A., McBrayer, J. F., & Sollins, P. 1973. Organic matter and 137Cs turnover in forest soil by earthworm populations: application of bioenergetics models to radionuclide transport. In Nelson, D. J. ed., Radionuclides in Ecosystems, 240–246. USAEC CONF- 710501-P1. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
IAEA. 2009. Quantification of Radionuclide Transfer in Terrestrial and Freshwater Environments for Radiological Assessments. IAEA-TECDOC-1616. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency.Google Scholar
Hunt, G. J. 1985. Timescales for dilution and dispersion of transuranics in the Irish Sea near Sellafield. Sci. Total Environ. 46: 261–78.Google Scholar
Crossley, D. A. 1969. Comparative movement of 106Ru, 60Co, and 137Cs in arthropod food chains. In Nelson, D. J. & Evans, F. C., eds., Symposium on Radioecology, 687–95.USAEC, CONF-670503. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Pentreath, R. J. 1983. Biological studies. In Interim Oceanographic Description of the North-East Atlantic Site for the Disposal of Low-Level Radioactive Waste, 101–118. Paris: Nuclear Energy Agency, OECD.Google Scholar
Persson, B. R. R., & Holm, E. 2011. Polonium-210 and lead-210 in the terrestrial environment: a historical review. J. Environ. Radioact. 102: 420–29.Google Scholar
IAEA. 2004. Sediment Distribution Coefficients and Concentration Factors for Biota in the Marine Environment. Technical Report Series 422. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency.Google Scholar
IAEA. 2014. Handbook of Parameter Values for the Prediction of Radionuclide Transfer to Wildlife. Technical Report Series 479. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency.Google Scholar
Desmet, G., Ed. 1988. Reliability of Radioactive Transfer Models. Essex: CEC, Elsevier Applied Science.Google Scholar
BIOMOVS. 1986. Progress Report No 1. Stockholm: National Institute of Radiation Protection.Google Scholar
Pröhl, G., Olysaegers, G., Kanyar, B., et al. 2005. Development and comparison of five site-specific biosphere models for safety assessment of radioactive waste disposal. J. Radiol. Prot. 25: 343–73.Google Scholar