Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-fv566 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-23T21:22:35.615Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Civil Society and the Contemporary Social Order

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2009

Frédérique Chaumont-Chancelier
Affiliation:
Centre d'Analyse Economique, Univerité d'Aix-Marselle III
Albert Breton
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
Gianluigi Galeotti
Affiliation:
Università degli Studi di Roma 'La Sapienza', Italy
Pierre Salmon
Affiliation:
Université de Bourgogne, France
Ronald Wintrobe
Affiliation:
University of Western Ontario
Get access

Summary

In a totalitarian State or in a field already made into State monopoly, those dissatisfied with the institutions that they find can seek a remedy only by seeking to change the Government of the country. In a free society and a free field they have a different remedy; discontented individuals with new ideas can make a new institution to meet their needs. The field is open to experiment and success or failure; secession is the midwife of invention.

INTRODUCTION: REDISCOVERING CIVIL SOCIETY

One of the most fascinating social facts in France is probably the formidable explosion of civil actions. This civil activism has various appearances and goals; however, it seems that people not only increasingly engage in humanitarian causes, they also try to solve institutional problems that fall into the public domain such as pollution, violence, illiteracy, and social exclusion. On the other side, the citizens' desertion from the political arena and the growth of incivilities in schools or suburbs suggest that the French society does not display only such a beautiful side. The point of departure of this chapter is the idea that all those social facts could be linked to each other with the help of an appropriate explanatory framework.

The recognition of the modern growth of civil activism directed to the provision of collective goods has lead to various reactions. Most of them are unsatisfactory since they exclusively rely on preferences such as impulses of solidarity.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aranson, P. 1989–1990. “Rational Ignorance in Politics, Economics and Law,”Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 25–42Google Scholar
Axelrod, R. 1984. The Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Basic Books
Benson, B. 1990. The Enterprise of Law: Justice without the State. San Francisco: Pacific Research Institute
Benson, B. 1998. To Serve and Protect: Privatization and Community in Criminal Justice. New York: New York University Press
Benson, B. 2000. “Jurisdictional Choice in International Trade: Implications for lex Cybernatoria,”Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines, Vol. X, No. 1, pp. 3–31Google Scholar
Boyer, R., Orlean A. 1994. “Persistance et Changement des Conventions. Deux Modèles Simples et quelques Illustrations,” in Orlean, A. (ed.), Analyse économique des conventions, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, Chapter 9, pp. 219–241
Breton, A., Galeotti, G., Salonon, P., and Wintrobe, R. (eds.). 1997. Understanding Democracy: Economic and Political Perspectives, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Buchanan, J. 1975. The Limits of Liberty. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Buchanan, J. 1982. “Cultural Evolution and Institutional Reform,” in Buchanan, J. 1987. Liberty, Market and State, Brighton, Wheastheaf Books, pp. 75–86
Buchanan, J. 1988. “The Constitution of Economic Policy,” in Public Choice and Constitutional Economics, Vol. 6, Political Economy and Public Policy. London: Jai Press
Chaumont-Chancelier, F. 1999a. Action humaine et évolution culturelle. Vers un entrepreneur en institutions, thèse de doctorat de l'Université d'Aix-Marseille III
Chaumont-Chancelier, F. 1999b. “Hayek's Complexity,”Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines, Vol. 9, No. 4, pp. 543–564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Congleton, R., and Vanberg, V. 1992. “Rationality, Morality and Exit,”American Political Science Review, Vol. 86, No. 2, pp. 418–431Google Scholar
Friedman, J. 1998. “Introduction: Public Ignorance and Democratic theory,”Critical Review, Public Ignorance, Vol. 12, No. 4 pp. 397–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garello, J. 1999. “Hayek's Unconventionalism,”Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines, Vol. 9, N0. 4, pp. 513–527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granovetter, M. 2000. Le Marché Autrement, Paris: Desclée-de-Brouwer
Green, D. 1993. Reinventing Civil Society. London: The IEA Health and Welfare Unit, Choice in Welfare No. 17
Gwartney J. D., and Wagner, R. E. 1988. “Public Choice and the Conduct of Representative Government,” in Public Choice and Constitutional Economics, Vol. 6, Political Economy and Public Policy. London: Jai Press
Hamowy, R. 1987. “The Scottish Enlightenment and the Theory of Spontaneous Order,” Journal of History of Philosophy, Monograph Series, eds. R. Podkin and R. Watson, Southern Illinois University Press: Carbondale and Edwardsville
Hayek, F. 1967. “Notes on the Evolution of Systems of Rules of Conduct,” in Hayek, F. (ed.), Studies in Philosophy, Politics and Economics. London: Routledge and Kegan, pp. 66–81
Hayek, F. 1973. Law, Legislation and Liberty, Vol. I. Rules and Order. London: Routledge and Kegan
Hayek, F. 1975. “Competition as a Discovery Procedure,” in Hayek, F., (ed.), New Studies in Philosophy, Politics, Economics and the History of Ideas. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 179–190
Hayek, F. 1976. “Law, Legislation and Liberty,” Vol. II: The Mirage of Social Justice. London and Henley: Routledge and Kegan
Hayek, F. 1979. “Law, Legislation and Liberty,” Vol. III. The Political Order of a Free People. London and Henley: Routledge and Kegan
Heiner, R. 1983. “The Origin of Predictable Behaviour,”American Economic Review, Vol. 73, No. 4, pp. 561–589Google Scholar
Hirschman, A. O. 1970. Exit, Voice and Loyalty. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Knight, J. 1992/1994. Institutions and Social Conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Knudsen, C. 1993b. “Modelling Rationality, Institutions and Processes in Economic Theory,” in Mäki U., Gustafson, B., and Knudsen, C. (eds.), Rationality, Institutions and Economic Methodology, London and New York: Routledge, pp. 265–299
Kuran, T. 1993. “Mitigating the Tyranny of Public Opinion,”Constitutional Political Economy, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 41–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langlois, R. (ed). 1986a. Economics as a Process: Essays in the New Institutional Economics. New York: Cambridge University Press
Langlois, R. 1986b. “Coherence and Flexibility: Social Institutions in a World of Radical Uncertainty,” in Kirzner, I. (ed), Subjectivism, Intelligibility, and Economic Understanding: Essays in Honor of the Eightieth Birthday of Ludwig Lachmann. New York: New York University Press, pp. 171–191
Mäki, U., Gustafsson, B., and Knudsen, C. (eds). 1993. Rationality, Institutions and Economic Methodology, London and New York: Routledge
Mises, L. 1949/1985. L'Action Humaine, Paris: Libre Echange, Presses Universitaires de France
Mueller, D. 1997. “Constitutional Democracy: An Interpretation,” in Breton A., Galeotti, G., Salmon, P., and Wintrobe, R. (eds.), Understanding Democracy: Economic and Political Perspectives, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 64–87
North, D. 1981. Structure and Change in Economic History. New York: Norton
North, D. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
O'Driscoll, G., and Rizzo, M. 1985. The Economics of Time and Ignorance. London and New York: Routledge
Olson, M. 1966/1978. La Logique de l'action Collective. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France
Ostrom, E. 1998. “A Behavioral Approach to the Rational Choice Theory of Collective Action,”American Political Science Review, Vol. 92, No. 1, MarchGoogle Scholar
Schotter, A. 1981. The Economic Theory of Social Institutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Simon, H. 1978. “Rationality as Process and a Product of Thought,” American Economic Review, Papers and proceedings, pp. 1–16
Sugden, R. 1986. The Evolution of Rights, Cooperation and Welfare. Oxford: Basic Blackwell
Vanberg, V. 1986. “Spontaneous Market Order and Social Rules: A Critical Examination of F. A. Hayek's Theory of Cultural Evolution,”Economics and Philosophy, Vol 2, pp. 75–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanberg, V. 1993. “Rational Choice, Rule-following and Institutions: An Evolutionary Perspective,” in Mäki, U., Gustafsson, B., and Knudsen, C. (eds.), Rationality, Institutions and Economic Methodology, London and New York: Routledge, pp. 171–200
Vanberg, V. 1994. Rules and Choice in Economics. London and New York: Routledge
Vromen, J. 1995. Economic Evolution. An Enquiry into the Foundations of New Institutional Economics, London and New York: Routledge
Witt, U. (ed). 1993. Evolutionary Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×