Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-rvbq7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-08T11:20:26.488Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 9 - Troy in Byzantine Romances

Homeric Reception in Digenis Akritis, the Tale of Achilles and the Tale of Troy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 December 2018

Adam J. Goldwyn
Affiliation:
North Dakota State University
Ingela Nilsson
Affiliation:
Uppsala Universitet, Sweden
Get access

Summary

This chapter examines the Palaiologan romances as examples of the different modes of Homeric reception in Byzantium. It begins by analyzing Digenis Akritis, demonstrating how Homeric motifs, narratological practices, allusions and references elevate the Byzantine hero to the status of Homeric hero and place the work within a broader tradition of heroic writing in Greek. In this, Digenis Akritis differs from the other works under consideration, the Tale of Achilles and the Tale of Troy, both of which retell parts of the Trojan War narrative, though with differing degrees of familiarity with the Homeric epics themselves. The paper concludes that Homeric influence on the Palaiologan romances was pervasive, though its influence is as often oblique and referential as direct and explicit.
Type
Chapter
Information
Reading the Late Byzantine Romance
A Handbook
, pp. 188 - 210
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Primary Sources

Jeffreys, E. (ed. and trans.), Digenis Akritis: The Grotaferrata and Escorial Versions (Cambridge 1998).Google Scholar
Legrand, É. (ed.), La guerre de Troie (Paris 1890).Google Scholar
Pichard, M. (ed.), Le Roman de Callimaque et de Chrysorrhoé (Paris 1956).Google Scholar
Betts, G. (trans.), Three Medieval Greek Romances (New York 1995), 3390.Google Scholar
Lampsidis, O. (ed.), Constantini Manassis Breviarium Chronicum, 2 vols. (Athens 1996).Google Scholar
Smith, O. L. (ed.), The Byzantine Achilleid. The Naples Version. Introduction, Critical Edition and Commentary by Ole L. Smith †. Edited and Prepared for Publication by P. A. Agapitos and K. Hult (Vienna 1999).Google Scholar
Nørgaard, L. and Smith, O. L. (eds.), A Byzantine Iliad. The Text of Par. Suppl. Gr. 926 (Copenhagen 1977).Google Scholar
Boissonade, J. F. (ed.), Tzetzae allegoriae Iliadis (Paris 1851).Google Scholar
Goldwyn, A. J. and Kokkini, D. (trans.), Allegories of the Iliad (Washington, DC 2015).Google Scholar
Breillat, P. (ed.), ‘La Table Ronde en Orient: Le Poeme Grec du Vieux Chevalier’, Mélanges d’Archéologie et d’Histoire 55 (1938), 308–40.Google Scholar
Goldwyn, A. J. (trans.), ‘Arthur in the East: Cross-Cultural Translations of Arthurian Romance in Greek and Hebrew, with a New Translation of “Ὁ Πρεσβύς Ἱπποτές (The Old Knight)”’, LATCH: The Journal of Literary Artifacts in Theory, Culture and History 5 (2012), 75105.Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

Jeffreys, E. (ed. and trans.), Digenis Akritis: The Grotaferrata and Escorial Versions (Cambridge 1998).Google Scholar
Legrand, É. (ed.), La guerre de Troie (Paris 1890).Google Scholar
Pichard, M. (ed.), Le Roman de Callimaque et de Chrysorrhoé (Paris 1956).Google Scholar
Betts, G. (trans.), Three Medieval Greek Romances (New York 1995), 3390.Google Scholar
Lampsidis, O. (ed.), Constantini Manassis Breviarium Chronicum, 2 vols. (Athens 1996).Google Scholar
Smith, O. L. (ed.), The Byzantine Achilleid. The Naples Version. Introduction, Critical Edition and Commentary by Ole L. Smith †. Edited and Prepared for Publication by P. A. Agapitos and K. Hult (Vienna 1999).Google Scholar
Nørgaard, L. and Smith, O. L. (eds.), A Byzantine Iliad. The Text of Par. Suppl. Gr. 926 (Copenhagen 1977).Google Scholar
Boissonade, J. F. (ed.), Tzetzae allegoriae Iliadis (Paris 1851).Google Scholar
Goldwyn, A. J. and Kokkini, D. (trans.), Allegories of the Iliad (Washington, DC 2015).Google Scholar
Breillat, P. (ed.), ‘La Table Ronde en Orient: Le Poeme Grec du Vieux Chevalier’, Mélanges d’Archéologie et d’Histoire 55 (1938), 308–40.Google Scholar
Goldwyn, A. J. (trans.), ‘Arthur in the East: Cross-Cultural Translations of Arthurian Romance in Greek and Hebrew, with a New Translation of “Ὁ Πρεσβύς Ἱπποτές (The Old Knight)”’, LATCH: The Journal of Literary Artifacts in Theory, Culture and History 5 (2012), 75105.Google Scholar
Agapitos, P. A. 1991. Narrative Structure in the Byzantine Vernacular Romances: A Textual Study of Kallimachos, Velthandros and Libistros. Munich.Google Scholar
Agapitos, P. A. 2004. ‘SO Debate: Genre, Structure and Poetics in the Byzantine Vernacular Romances of Love’, Symbolae Osloensis 79: 7101.Google Scholar
Agapitos, P. A. 2012. ‘In Rhomaian, Frankish and Persian Lands: Fiction and Fictionality in Byzantium’, in Medieval Narrative Between History and Fiction: From the Centre to the Periphery of Europe, c. 1100–1400, ed. Agapitos, P. A. and Mortensen, L. B.. Copenhagen, 235367.Google Scholar
Agapitos, P. A. and Smith, O. L., 1992. The Study of Medieval Greek Romance. Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Baldwyn, B. 1988. ‘The Description of Agamemnon in Digenis Akrites’, BMGS 12(1): 279–82.Google Scholar
Beaton, R. 1996. The Medieval Greek Romance, 2nd edn. London and New York.Google Scholar
Browning, R. 1975. ‘Homer in Byzantium’, Viator 6: 1537.Google Scholar
Browning, R. 1992. ‘A Fourteenth-Century Prose Version of the Odyssey’, DOP 46: 2736.Google Scholar
Cullhed, E. 2014. ‘The Blind Bard and “I”: Homeric Biography and Authorial Personas in the Twelfth Century’, BMGS 38(1): 4967.Google Scholar
Cullhed, E. 2016. Eustathios of Thessalonike, Commentary on Homer’s Odyssey: Vol. I on Rhapsodies A–B. Uppsala.Google Scholar
Cupane, C. 1995. Romanzi cavallereschi bizantini: Callimacho e Crisorroe – Beltandro e Crisanza – Storia di Achille – Florio e Platziaflore – Storia di Apollonio di Tiro – Favola consolatoria sulla Cattiva e la Buona Sorte. Turin.Google Scholar
Easterling, P. 2003. ‘Sophocles and the Byzantine Student’, in Porphyrogenita: Essays Presented to Julian Chrysostomides, ed. Dendrinos, C. et al. Aldershot, 319–33.Google Scholar
Elizbarashvili, E. 2010. ‘The Formation of a Hero in Digenes Akrites, GRBS 50: 437–60.Google Scholar
Fludernik, M. 2003. ‘The Diachronization of Narratology’, Narrative 11.3: 331–48.Google Scholar
Genette, G. 1997. Palimpsests: Literature in the Second Degree. Trans. Newman, C. and Doubinsky, C.. Lincoln and London.Google Scholar
Goldwyn, A. 2012. ‘Arthur in the East: Cross-Cultural Translations of Arthurian Romance in Greek and Hebrew, Including a New Translation of ‘O Πρέσβυς Ἱππότης (The Old Knight)”’, LATCH 5: 75105.Google Scholar
Goldwyn, A. 2015. ‘John Malalas and the Origins of the Allegorical and Novelistic Traditions of the Trojan War in Byzantium’, Troianalexandrina 15: 2349.Google Scholar
Graziosi, B. 2015. ‘On Seeing the Poet: Arabic, Italian and Byzantine Portraits of Homer’, Scandinavian Journal of Byzantine and Modern Greek Studies 1: 2547.Google Scholar
Hesseling, D. C. 1919. L’Achilléide byzantine publiée avec une introduction, des observations et un index par D. C. Hesseling. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Jeffreys, E. 1978. ‘Constantine Hermoniakos and Byzantine Education’, Dodone 4: 81109.Google Scholar
Jeffreys, E. 1998. Introduction to Digenis Akritis, ed. Jeffreys, E.. Cambridge, 1lxii.Google Scholar
Jong, I. de. 2014. Narratology and Classics: A Practical Guide. Oxford.Google Scholar
Jouanno, C. 2016. ‘Shared Spaces: 1 Digenis Akritis, the Two-Blood Border Lord’, in Fictional Storytelling in the Medieval Eastern Mediterranean and Beyond, ed. Cupane, C. and Krönung, B.. Leiden, 260–84.Google Scholar
Kaldellis, A. 2008. Hellenism in Byzantium: The Transformations of Greek Identity and the Reception of the Classical Tradition. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Keydell, R. 1979. ‘Achilleis. Zur problematik und Geschichte eines griechischen Romans’, BF 6: 8399.Google Scholar
Lavagnini, R. 1969–70. ‘Note sullAchilleide’, Rivista di Studi Bizantini e Neoellenici 6–7: 165–79.Google Scholar
Lavagnini, R. 1988. I fatti di Troia: L’Iliade bizantina del cod. Par. Suppl. Gr. 926. Introduzione, traduzione e note. Palermo.Google Scholar
Lavagnini, R. 2016. ‘Tales of the Trojan War’, in Fictional Storytelling in the Eastern Mediterranean and Beyond, ed. Cupane, C. and Krönung, B.. Leiden, 234–59.Google Scholar
Lattimore, R., trans. 1967. The Odyssey of Homer. New York.Google Scholar
Mango, C. 1981. ‘Discontinuity with the Classical Past in Byzantium’, in Byzantium and the Classical Tradition, ed. Mullett, M. and Scott, R.. Birmingham, 4860.Google Scholar
Marciniak, P. 2013. ‘The Undead in Byzantium: Some Notes on the Reception of Ancient Literature in Twelfth-Century Byzantium’, Troianalexandrina 13: 95111.Google Scholar
Moennig, U. 1998. ‘Textkritische Bemerkungen zum Schiffskatalog der sog. byzantinischen Ilias’, in Lesarten. Festschrift für Athanasios Kambylis zum 70. Geburtstag dargebracht von Schülern, Kollegen und Freunden, ed. Vassis, I., Henrich, G. S. and Reinsch, D. R.. Berlin and New York, 283–92.Google Scholar
Nilsson, I. 2004. ‘From Homer to Hermoniakos: Some Considerations of Troy Matter in Byzantine Literature’, Troianalexandrina 4: 834.Google Scholar
Nilsson, I. 2006. ‘Discovering Literariness in the Past: Literature vs. History in the Synopsis Chronike of Konstantinos Manasses’, in L’écriture de la mémoire: la litterarité de l’historiographie, ed. Odorico, P., Agapitos, P. A. and Hinterberger, M.. Paris, 1531.Google Scholar
Nilsson, I. 2010. ‘The Same Story But Another: A Reappraisal of Literary Imitation in Byzantium’, in Imitatio – aemulatio – variatio, ed. Schiffer, E. and Rhoby, A.. Vienna, 195208.Google Scholar
Nilsson, I. 2014. Raconter Byzance: La littérature au xiie siècle. Paris.Google Scholar
Nilsson, I. (forthcoming). ‘Byzantine Narrative: Theory and Practice’, in Oxford Handbook of Byzantine Literature, ed. Papaioannou, S..Google Scholar
Nørgaard, L. and Smith, O. L., ed. 1975. A Byzantine Iliad. The Text of Par. Suppl. Gr. 926. Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Pontani, F. 2005. ‘A Byzantine Portrait of Homer’, Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 68: 126.Google Scholar
Ricks, D. 1990. Byzantine Heroic Poetry. Bristol.Google Scholar
Ricks, D. 1993. ‘Digenes Akrites as Literature’, in Digenes Akrites: New Approaches to Byzantine Heroic Poetry. Aldershot: 161–70.Google Scholar
Smith, O. 1991–2. ‘Some Features of Structure and Narrative in the Byzantine Achilleid’, Hellenika 75–95.Google Scholar
Smith, O. ed. 1999. The Byzantine Achilleid. The Naples Version. Introduction, critical edition and commentary by Ole L. Smith †. Edited and prepared for publication by P. A. Agapitos and K. Hult. Vienna.Google Scholar
Trapp, E. 1971. Digenes Akrites – synoptische Ausgabe der ältesten Versionen. Vienna.Google Scholar
Jeffreys, E. (ed. and trans.), Digenis Akritis: The Grotaferrata and Escorial Versions (Cambridge 1998).Google Scholar
Legrand, É. (ed.), La guerre de Troie (Paris 1890).Google Scholar
Pichard, M. (ed.), Le Roman de Callimaque et de Chrysorrhoé (Paris 1956).Google Scholar
Betts, G. (trans.), Three Medieval Greek Romances (New York 1995), 3390.Google Scholar
Lampsidis, O. (ed.), Constantini Manassis Breviarium Chronicum, 2 vols. (Athens 1996).Google Scholar
Smith, O. L. (ed.), The Byzantine Achilleid. The Naples Version. Introduction, Critical Edition and Commentary by Ole L. Smith †. Edited and Prepared for Publication by P. A. Agapitos and K. Hult (Vienna 1999).Google Scholar
Nørgaard, L. and Smith, O. L. (eds.), A Byzantine Iliad. The Text of Par. Suppl. Gr. 926 (Copenhagen 1977).Google Scholar
Boissonade, J. F. (ed.), Tzetzae allegoriae Iliadis (Paris 1851).Google Scholar
Goldwyn, A. J. and Kokkini, D. (trans.), Allegories of the Iliad (Washington, DC 2015).Google Scholar
Breillat, P. (ed.), ‘La Table Ronde en Orient: Le Poeme Grec du Vieux Chevalier’, Mélanges d’Archéologie et d’Histoire 55 (1938), 308–40.Google Scholar
Goldwyn, A. J. (trans.), ‘Arthur in the East: Cross-Cultural Translations of Arthurian Romance in Greek and Hebrew, with a New Translation of “Ὁ Πρεσβύς Ἱπποτές (The Old Knight)”’, LATCH: The Journal of Literary Artifacts in Theory, Culture and History 5 (2012), 75105.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×