Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-tdptf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-18T02:53:03.216Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2010

Jeffrey M. Stonecash
Affiliation:
Syracuse University, New York
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramowitz, Alan I. 1975. “Name Familiarity, Reputation and the Incumbency Effect in a Congressional Election.” Western Political Quarterly. Vol. 28, No. 4 (December): 668–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abramowitz, Alan I.. 1989. “Campaign Spending in U.S. Senate Elections.” Legislative Studies Quarterly. Vol. 14, No. 4 (November): 487–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abramowitz, Alan I.. 1991. “Incumbency, Campaign Spending, and the Decline of Competition in U.S. House Elections.” Journal of Politics. Vol. 53, No. 1 (February): 34–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abramowitz, Alan I., and Saunders, Kyle L.. 1998. “Ideological Realignments in the U.S. Electorate.” Journal of Politics. Vol. 60, No. 3 (August): 634–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aldrich, John H. 1995. Why Parties: The Origin and Transformation of Party Politics in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alford, John R., and Hibbing, John R.. 1981. “Increased Incumbency Advantage in the House.” Journal of Politics. Vol. 43, No. 4 (November): 1042–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersen, Kristi. 1979. The Creation of the Democratic Majority 1928–1936. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ansolabehere, Stephen, Snyder, James M., and Charles, Stewart III. 2000. “Old Voters, New Voters, and the Personal Vote: Using Redistricting to Measure the Incumbency Advantage.” American Journal of Political Science. Vol. 44, No. 1 (January): 17–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartels, Larry M. 2000. “Partisanship and Voting Behavior, 1952–1996.” American Journal of Political Science. Vol. 44, No. 1 (January): 35–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bensel, Richard F. 2000. The Political Economy of American Industrialism, 1877–1900. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, Earl, and Black, Merle. 1987. Politics and Society in the South. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Black, Earl, and Black, Merle. 1992. The Vital South. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, Earl, and Black, Merle. 2002. The Rise of Southern Republicans. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bond, Jon R. 2001. “A Silver Anniversary Retrospective on David Mayhew's Congress: The Electoral Connection.” PS: Political Science and Politics. Vol. 34, No. 2 (June): 253–54.Google Scholar
Born, Richard. 1979. “Generational Replacement and the Growth of Incumbent Reelection Margins in the U.S. House.” American Political Science Review. Vol. 73, No. 3 (September): 811–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brady, David W., Cogan, John F., and Fiorina, Morris P.. 2000. “An Introduction.” In Brady, David W., Cogan, John F., and Fiorina, Morris P., eds., Continuity and Change in House Elections. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press: 1–9.Google Scholar
Brady, David W., D'Onofrio, Robert, and Fiorina, Morris P.. 2000. “The Nationalization of Electoral Forces Revisited.” In Brady, David W., Cogan, John F., and Fiorina, Morris P., eds., Continuity and Change in House Elections. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press: 130–48.Google Scholar
Breaux, David A. 1990. “Specifying the Impact of Incumbency on State Legislative Elections: A District-Level Analysis.” American Politics Quarterly. Vol. 18, No. 3 (July): 270–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brennan, Mary C. 1995. Turning Right in the Sixties: The Conservative Capture of the GOP. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Brewer, Mark D., and Stonecash, Jeffrey M.. 2007. Split: Class and Cultural Divides in American Politics. Washington, DC: CQ Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brewer, Mark D., and Stonecash, Jeffrey M.. 2009. The Dynamics of American Political Parties. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnham, Walter Dean. 1965. “The Changing Shape of the American Political Universe.” American Political Science Review. Vol. 59, No. 1 (March): 7–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnham, Walter Dean. 1970. Critical Elections and the Mainsprings of American Politics. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Burnham, Walter Dean. 1975. “Insulation and Responsiveness in Congressional Elections.” Political Science Quarterly. Vol. 90, No. 3 (Fall): 411–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, James E. 1983. “The Return of the Incumbents: The Nature of the Incumbency Advantage.” Western Political Quarterly. Vol. 36, No. 3 (September): 434–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carson, Jamie L., Engstrom, Erik J., and Roberts, Jason M.. 2007. “Candidate Quality, the Personal Vote, and the Incumbency Advantage in Congress.” American Political Science Review. Vol. 101, No. 2 (May): 289–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, Dan T. 1995. The Politics of Rage: George Wallace, the Origins of the New Conservatism and the Transformation of American Politics. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.Google Scholar
Collie, Melissa P. 1981. “Incumbency, Electoral Safety, and Turnover in the House of Representatives, 1972–1976.” American Political Science Review. Vol. 75, No. 1 (March): 119–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quarterly, Congressional. 2001. Congressional Quarterly's Guide to U.S. Elections, 4th ed. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Converse, Philip E. 1976. The Dynamics of Party Support. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Cover, Albert. 1977. “One Good Term Deserves Another: The Advantage of Incumbency in Congressional Elections.” American Journal of Political Science. Vol. 21, No. 3 (August): 523–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cover, Albert D., and Mayhew, David R.. 1977. “Congressional Dynamics and the Decline of Competitive Congressional Elections.” In Dodd, Lawrence C. and Oppenheimer, Bruce I., eds., Congress Reconsidered. Washington, DC: CQ Press: 62–82.Google Scholar
Cox, Gary, and Katz, Jonathan. 1996. “Why Did the Incumbency Advantage Grow?American Journal of Political Science. Vol. 40, No. 2 (May): 478–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Gary W., and Morgenstern, Scott. 1993. “The Increasing Advantage of Incumbency in the U.S. States.” Legislative Studies Quarterly. Vol. 18, No. 4 (November): 495–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cummings, Milton C. 1966. Congressmen and the Electorate. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Degler, Carl N. 1964. “American Political Parties and the Rise of the City: An Interpretation.” Journal of American History. Vol. 51, No. 1 (June): 41–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dionne, E. J. 1997. They Only Look Dead. New York: Touchstone.Google Scholar
Dodd, Lawrence. 2001. “Comments on David Mayhew's Congress: The Electoral Connection.” PS: Political Science and Politics. Vol. 34, No. 2 (June): 262–64.Google Scholar
Dubin, Michael J. 1998. United States Congressional Elections, 1788–1997. Jefferson, NC: McFarland.Google Scholar
Edwards, Lee. 1999. The Conservative Revolution. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Edwards, George C., III, Wattenberg, Martin P., and Lineberry, Robert L.. 2004. Government in America, 11th ed. New York: Pearson Longman.Google Scholar
Erikson, Robert S. 1971. “The Advantage of Incumbency in Congressional Elections.” Polity. Vol. 3, No. 3 (Spring): 395–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erikson, Robert S.. 1972. “Malapportionment, Gerrymandering and Party Fortunes in Congressional Elections.” American Political Science Review. Vol. 66, No. 4 (March): 1234–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erikson, Robert S.. 1976. “Is There Anything Such as a Safe Seat?Polity. Vol. 8, No. 4 (Summer): 623–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erikson, Robert S., and Wright, Gerald C.. 2001. “Voters, Candidates, and Issues in Congressional Elections.” In Dodd, Lawrence C. and Oppenheimer, Bruce I., eds., Congress Reconsidered, 7th ed. Washington, DC: CQ Press: 67–95.Google Scholar
Fenno, Richard F. 1978. Home Style: House Members in Their Districts. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Ferejohn, John A. 1977. “On the Decline of Competition in Congressional Elections.” American Political Science Review. Vol. 71, No. 1 (March): 166–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiorina, Morris. 1973. “Electoral Margins, Constituency Influence, and Policy Moderation: A Critical Assessment.” American Politics Quarterly. Vol. 1, No. 4 (October): 479–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiorina, Morris. 1977a. “The Case of the Vanishing Marginals: The Bureaucracy Did It.” American Political Science Review. Vol. 71, No. 1 (March): 177–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiorina, Morris. 1977b. Congress: Keystone to the Washington Establishment. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Fiorina, Morris. 1980. “The Decline of Collective Responsibility in American Politics.” Daedalus. Vol. 9, No. 1 (Summer): 25–45.Google Scholar
Fiorina, Morris. 1981. “Some Problems in Studying the Effects of Resource Allocation in Congressional Elections.” American Journal of Political Science. Vol. 25, No. 3 (August): 543–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flanigan, William H., and Zingale, Nancy H.. 1979. Political Behavior of the American Electorate. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Froman, Lewis A. 1963a. Congressmen and Their Constituencies. Chicago: McNally.Google Scholar
Froman, Lewis A.. 1963b. “Inter-party Constituency Differences and Congressional Voting Behavior.” American Political Science Review. Vol. 57, No. 1 (March): 57–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garand, James C. 1991. “Electoral Marginality in State Legislative Elections, 1968–1986.” Legislative Studies Quarterly. Vol. 16, No. 1 (February): 7–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garand, James C., and Gross, Donald A.. 1984. “Changes in the Vote Margins for Congressional Candidates: A Specification of Historical Trends.” American Political Science Review. Vol. 78, No. 1 (March): 17–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, Michael. 2003. Harry Truman and Civil Rights: Moral Courage and Political Risks. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Gelman, Andrew, and Huang, Zaiying. Forthcoming. “Estimating Incumbency Advantage and Its Variation as an Example of a Before-After Study.” Journal of the American Statistical Association. http://www.stat.columbia.edu/~gelman/research/published/inc6.pdf (accessed May 2007).
Gelman, Andrew, and King, Gary. 1990. “Estimating Incumbency Effect without Bias.” American Journal of Political Science. Vol. 34, No. 4 (November): 1142–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginsberg, Benjamin, Lowi, Theodore J., and Weir, Margaret. 2005. We the People: An Introduction to American Politics, Shorter 5th ed. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Green, John C., Kellstedt, Lyman A., Smidt, Corwin E., and Guth, James L.. 1998. “The Soul of the South: Religion and the New Electoral Order.” In Bullock, Charles S. and Rozell, Mark J., The New Politics of the Old South. Boulder, CO: Rowman and Littlefield: 261–276.Google Scholar
Griffin, John D. 2006. “Electoral Competition and Democratic Responsiveness: A Defense of the Marginality Hypothesis.” Journal of Politics. Vol. 68, No. 4 (November): 911–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gross, Donald A., and Garand, James C.. 1984. “The Vanishing Marginals, 1824–1980.” Journal of Politics. Vol. 46, No. 1 (February): 224–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gujarati, Damodar N. 2003. Basic Econometrics, 4th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Hibbing, John R. 1991. Congressional Careers: Contours of Life in the U.S. House of Representatives. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Herrnson, Paul S. 2004. Congressional Elections: Campaigning at Home and in Washington, 4th ed. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Hodgson, Godfrey. 1996. The World Turned Right Side Up. Boston: Mariner Books.Google Scholar
Hofstadter, Richard. 1955. The Age of Reform: From Bryan to F.D.R. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Hurley, Patricia A. 2001. “David Mayhew's The Electoral Connection after 25 Years.” PS: Political Science and Politics. Vol. 34, No. 2 (June): 259–60.Google Scholar
Jacobson, Gary C. 1978. “The Effects of Campaign Spending in Congressional Elections.” American Political Science Review. Vol. 72, No. 2 (June): 469–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobson, Gary C.. 1983. The Politics of Congressional Elections. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Jacobson, Gary C.. 1985. “Money and Votes Reconsidered: Congressional Elections, 1972–1982.” Public Choice. Vol. 47, No. 1 (January): 7–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobson, Gary C.. 1987. “The Marginals Never Vanished: Incumbency and Competition in Elections to the U.S. House of Representatives, 1952–1982.” American Journal of Political Science. Vol. 31, No. 1 (February): 126–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobson, Gary C.. 1990. “The Effects of Campaign Spending in House Elections: New Evidence for Old Arguments.” American Journal of Political Science. Vol. 34, No. 2 (May): 334–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobson, Gary C.. 2000a. “Party Polarization in National Politics: The Electoral Connection.” In Bond, Jon R. and Fleisher, Richard, eds., Polarized Politics. Washington, DC: CQ Press: 9–30.Google Scholar
Jacobson, Gary C.. 2000b. “Reversal of Fortune: The Transformation of U.S. House Elections in the 1990s.” In Brady, David W., Cogan, John F., and Fiorina, Morris, eds., Continuity and Change in House Elections. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press: 10–38.Google Scholar
Jacobson, Gary C.. 2001. The Politics of Congressional Elections, 5th ed. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Jacobson, Gary C.. 2003. “Party Polarization in Presidential Support: The Electoral Connection.” Congress and the Presidency. Vol. 30, No. 1 (Spring): 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobson, Gary C.. 2004. The Politics of Congressional Elections, 6th ed. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Jacobson, Gary C.. 2007. A Divider, Not a Uniter: George W. Bush and the American People. New York: Pearson Longman.Google Scholar
James, Scott C. 2000. Presidents, Parties and the State: A Party System Perspective on Democratic Regulatory Choice, 1884–1936. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janda, Kenneth, Berry, Jeffrey M., and Goldman, Jerry. 2005. The Challenge of Democracy. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Jewell, Malcolm E., and Breaux, David A.. 1988. “The Effect of Incumbency on State Legislative Elections.” Legislative Studies Quarterly. Vol. 13, No. 4 (November): 495–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johannes, John R. 1979. “Casework as a Technique of U.S. Congressional Oversight of the Executive.” Legislative Studies Quarterly. Vol. 4, No. 3 (August): 325–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johannes, John R., and McAdams, John C.. 1981. “The Congressional Incumbency Effect: Is It Casework, Policy Compatibility, or Something Else?American Journal of Political Science. Vol. 25, No. 3 (August): 512–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Charles O. 1959. “Secular Realignment and the Party System.” Journal of Politics. Vol. 21, No. 2 (May): 198–210.Google Scholar
Jones, Charles O. 1964. “Inter-party Competition in Congressional Seats.” Western Political Quarterly. Vol. 17, No. 3 (September): 461–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Key, V. O. 1959. “Secular Realignment and the Party System.” Journal of Politics. Vol. 21, No. 2 (May): 198–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krasno, Jonathon S., and Green, Donald P.. 1988. “Preempting Quality Challengers in House Elections.” Journal of Politics. Vol. 50, No. 4 (November): 920–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krehbiel, Keith, and Wright, John R.. 1983. “The Incumbency Effect in Congressional Elections: A Test of Two Explanations.” American Journal of Political Science. Vol. 27, No. 1 (February): 140–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leogrande, William M., and Jeydel, Alana S.. 1997. “Using Presidential Election Returns to Measure Constituency Ideology: A Research Note.” American Politics Quarterly. Vol. 25, No. 1 (January): 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitt, Steven D., and Wolfram, Catherine D.. 1997. “Decomposing the Sources of Incumbency Advantage.” Legislative Studies Quarterly. Vol. 22, No. 1 (February): 45–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacRae, Duncan 1952. “The Relation between Roll Call Votes and Constituencies in the Massachusetts House of Representatives.” American Political Science Review. Vol. 46, No. 4 (December): 1046–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mann, Thomas E. 1978. Unsafe at Any Margin. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.Google Scholar
Martis, Kenneth C. 1982. The Historical Atlas of United States Congressional Districts, 1789–1983. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Mayhew, David R. 1966. Party Loyalty among Congressmen. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayhew, David R.. 1974a. “Congressional Elections: The Case of the Vanishing Marginals.” Polity. Vol. 6, No. 3 (Spring): 295–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayhew, David R.. 1974b. The Electoral Connection. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Mayhew, David R.. 2002. Electoral Realignments: A Critique of an American Genre. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
McAdams, John C., and Johannes, John R.. 1988. “Congressmen, Perquisites, and Elections.” Journal of Politics. Vol. 50, No. 2 (May): 412–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menefee-Libey, David. 2000. The Triumph of Candidate-Centered Politics. New York: Chatham House.Google Scholar
Nelson, Candice J. 1978–1979. “The Effect of Incumbency on Voting in Congressional Elections.” Political Science Quarterly. Vol. 93, No. 4 (Winter): 665–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nie, Norman, Verba, Sidney, and Petrocik, John. 1976. The Changing American Voter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Parker, Glenn R. 1980. “The Advantage of Incumbency in House Elections.” American Politics Quarterly. Vol. 8, No. 4 (October): 375–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patterson, Thomas E. 2006. We the People: A Concise Introduction to American Politics, 6th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Payne, James L. 1980. “The Personal Electoral Advantage of House Incumbents, 1936–1976.” American Politics Research. Vol. 8, No. 4 (October): 465–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perlstein, Rick. 2001. Before the Storm: Barry Goldwater and the Unmaking of the American Consensus. New York: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar
Phillips, Kevin. 1969. The Emerging Republican Majority. New York: Anchor.Google Scholar
Polsby, Nelson W. 1968. “The Institutionalization of the U.S. House of Representatives.” American Political Science Review. Vol. 62, No. 1 (March): 144–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polsby, Nelson W.. 2004. How Congress Evolves: Social Bases of Institutional Change. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Poole, Keith T., and Rosenthal, Howard. 1984. “The Polarization of American Politics.” Journal of Politics. Vol. 46, No. 4 (November): 1061–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poole, Keith T., and Rosenthal, Howard. 1985. “A Spatial Model for Legislative Roll Call Analysis.” American Journal of Political Science. Vol. 29, No. 2 (May): 357–84.CrossRef
Poole, Keith T., and Rosenthal, Howard. 1991. “Patterns of Congressional Voting.” American Journal of Political Science. Vol. 35, No. 1 (February): 228–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poole, Keith T., and Rosenthal, Howard. 1997. Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll Call Voting. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rae, Nicol C. 1989. The Decline and Fall of the Liberal Republicans from 1952 to the Present. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sanders, Elizabeth. 1999. Roots of Reform: Farmers, Workers, and the American State. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Schwarz, John E., and Fenmore, Barton. 1977. “Presidential Election Results and Congressional Roll Call Behavior: The Cases of 1964, 1968, and 1972.” Legislative Studies Quarterly. Vol. 2, No. 4 (November): 409–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Serra, George. 1994. “What's in It for Me: The Impact of Congressional Casework on Incumbent Evaluation.” American Politics Quarterly. Vol. 22, No. 4 (October): 403–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Serra, George, and Cover, Albert D.. 1992. “The Electoral Consequences of Perquisite Use: The Casework Case.” Legislative Studies Quarterly. Vol. 17, No. 2 (May): 233–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shea, Daniel M., Green, Joanne Connor, and Smith, Christopher E.. 2007. Living Democracy. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Sinclair, Barbara. 1982. Congressional Realignment 1925–1978. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Stimson, James A. 2005. Tides of Consent: How Public Opinion Shapes American Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stonecash, Jeffrey M. 2003. “Reconsidering the Trend in Incumbent Vote Percentages in House Elections.” American Review of Politics. Vol. 24, No. 1 (Fall): 225–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stonecash, Jeffrey M.. 2005. Parties Matter: Realignment and the Return of Partisanship. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Stonecash, Jeffrey M.. 2007. “The Rise of Conservatives: More Conservatives or More Concentrated Conservatives?” In Green, John, ed., The State of the Parties, 5th ed. Boulder, CO: Rowman and Littlefield: 317–330.Google Scholar
Stonecash, Jeffrey M., Brewer, Mark D., and Mariani, Mack D.. 2003. Diverging Parties: Social Change, Realignment, and Party Polarization. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
Stonecash, Jeffrey M., and Lindstrom, Nicole R.. 1999. “Emerging Party Cleavages in the House of Representatives: 1962–1996.” American Politics Quarterly. Vol. 27, No. 1 (January): 58–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sundquist, James L. 1983. Dynamics of the Party System: Alignment and Realignment of Political Parties in the United States, rev. ed. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Tufte, Edward R. 1973. “The Relationship between Seats and Votes in Two-Party Systems.” American Political Science Review. Vol. 67, No. 2 (June): 540–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, Julius. 1951. Party and Constituency: Pressures on Congress. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Turner, Julius, and Schneier, Edward V.. 1970. Party and Constituency: Pressures on Congress, rev. ed. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Ware, Alan. 2006. The Democratic Party Moves North: 1877–1962. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wattenberg, Martin P. 1991. The Rise of Candidate-Centered Politics: Presidential Elections of the 1980s. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, James Q., and Dilulio, John J. 2006. American Government: The Essentials. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Yiannakis, , Evans, Diana. 1981. “The Grateful Electorate: Casework and Congressional Elections.” American Journal of Political Science. Vol. 25, No. 3 (August): 568–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaller, John R. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Jeffrey M. Stonecash, Syracuse University, New York
  • Book: Reassessing the Incumbency Effect
  • Online publication: 06 July 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511756184.014
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Jeffrey M. Stonecash, Syracuse University, New York
  • Book: Reassessing the Incumbency Effect
  • Online publication: 06 July 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511756184.014
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Jeffrey M. Stonecash, Syracuse University, New York
  • Book: Reassessing the Incumbency Effect
  • Online publication: 06 July 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511756184.014
Available formats
×