Achard, G. (1981) Pratique rhétorique et idéologie politique dans les discours “optimates” de Cicéron. Leiden.Google Scholar

Adams, J. N. (1978) “Conventions of naming in Cicero,” CQ n.s. 28: 145–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adams, J. N. (2013) Social Variation and the Latin Language. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ahl, F. (1976) Lucan: An Introduction. Ithaca.Google Scholar

Alewell, K. (1913) “Über das rhetorische Paradeigma: Theorie, Beispielsammlungen, Verwendung in der römischen Literatur der Kaiserzeit.” Ph.D. diss., Christian-Albrechts-Universität, Kiel.Google Scholar

Alfonsi, L. (1965) “Dall’‘Hortensius’ al ‘Dialogus de oratoribus,’” Latomus 24: 40–44.Google Scholar

Allen, W. A. (1954) “Cicero’s conceit,” TAPhA 85: 121–144.Google Scholar

Altman, W. H. F. (ed.) (2015a) Brill’s Companion to the Reception of Cicero. Leiden.Google Scholar

Altman, W. H. F. (2015b) “Cicero and the fourth triumvirate: Gruen, Syme, and Strasburger,” in Altman (2015a): 215–246.Google Scholar

Anderson, G. (1993) The Second Sophistic: A Cultural Phenomenon in the Roman Empire. London.Google Scholar

Arena, V. (2012) Libertas and the Practice of Politics in the Late Roman Republic. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Badian, E. (1973) “Marius’ villas: the testimony of the slave and the knave,” JRS 63: 121–132.Google Scholar

Barchiesi, A. (1993) “Future reflexive: two modes of allusion and Ovid’s Heroides,” HSPh 95: 333–365.Google Scholar

Bardon, H. (1953) “Tacite et le ‘Dialogue des orateurs,’” Latomus 12: 166–187.Google Scholar

Barnes, T. D. (1986) “The significance of Tacitus’ Dialogus de oratoribus,” HSPh 90: 225–244.Google Scholar

Bartsch, S. (1994) Actors in the Audience: Theatricality and Doublespeak from Nero to Hadrian. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Bartsch, S., and Schiesaro, A. (eds.) (2015) The Cambridge Companion to Seneca. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Barwick, K. (1929) “Zur Erklärung und Komposition des Rednerdialogs des Tacitus,” in Festschrift Walter Judeich zum 70. Geburtstag. Weimar: 81–108.Google Scholar

Barwick, K. (1954) Der Dialogus de oratoribus des Tacitus: Motive und Zeit seiner Entstehung. Berlin.Google Scholar

Beagon, M. (2005) The Elder Pliny on the Human Animal: Natural History, Book 7. Oxford.Google Scholar

Beard, M. (1993) “Looking (harder) for Roman myth: Dumézil, declamation and the problems of definition,” in Mythos in mythenloser Gesellschaft: Das Paradigma Roms, ed. Graf, F.. Stuttgart: 44–64.Google Scholar

Beard, M. (2002) “Ciceronian correspondences: making a book out of letters,” in Classics in Progress, ed. Wiseman, T. P.. Oxford: 103–144.Google Scholar

Beaujeu, J. (1991) Cicéron: Correspondance, vol. x. Paris.Google Scholar

Becher, F. (1882) “Ueber die Sprache der Briefe ad Brutum,” RhM 37: 576–597.Google Scholar

Becher, F. (1885) “Die sprachliche Eigenart der Briefe ad Brutum,” Philologus 44: 471–501.Google Scholar

Beck, J.-W. (1998) “Germania”-“Agricola”: zwei Kapitel zu Tacitus’ zwei kleinen Schriften. Untersuchungen zu ihrer Intention und Datierung sowie zur Entwicklung ihres Verfassers. Hildesheim.Google Scholar

Beck, M. (2001) “Das dramatische Datum des Dialogus de oratoribus: Überlegungen zu einer in Vergessenheit geratenen Streitfrage,” RhM 144: 159–172.Google Scholar

Bederman, D. J. (2008) The Classical Foundations of the American Constitution: Prevailing Wisdom. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Bellen, H. (1985) “Cicero und der Aufstieg Octavians,” Gymnasium 92: 161–189.Google Scholar

Berry, D. H. (1996) Pro P. Sulla oratio. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Berry, D. H. (2000) Cicero: Defence Speeches. Oxford.Google Scholar

Berti, E. (2007) Scholasticorum studia: Seneca il Vecchio e la cultura retorica e letteraria della prima età imperiale. Pisa.Google Scholar

Bill, C. P. (1941) “Lecythizing,” CPh 36: 46–51.Google Scholar

Bingham, W. J. (1978) “A Study of the Livian ‘Periochae’ and their relation to Livy’s ‘Ab Urbe Condita.’” Ph.D. diss., University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar

Birley, A. R. (2000a) “The life and death of Cornelius Tacitus,” Historia 49: 230–247.Google Scholar

Birley, A. R. (2000b) Onomasticon to Pliny the Younger. Munich.Google Scholar

Birley, A. R. (2016) = 2000b, in Gibson and Whitton (2016): 51–66.Google Scholar

Bishop, C. (2015) “Roman Plato or Roman Demosthenes,” in Altman (2015a): 283–306.Google Scholar

Bishop, C. (2016) “How to make a Roman Demosthenes: self-fashioning in Cicero’s Brutus and Orator,” CJ 111: 167–192.Google Scholar

Bloomer, W. M. (1992) Valerius Maximus and the Rhetoric of the New Nobility. Chapel Hill.Google Scholar

Bloomer, W. M. (1997a) “Schooling in persona: imagination and subordination in Roman education,” ClAnt 16: 57–78.Google Scholar

Bloomer, W. M. (1997b) Latinity and Literary Society at Rome. Philadelphia.Google Scholar

Bloomer, W. M. (2011) The School of Rome: Latin Studies and the Origins of Liberal Education. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Bloomer, W. M. (ed.) (2015a) A Companion to Ancient Education. Malden, MA.Google Scholar

Bloomer, W. M. (2015b) “Corporal punishment in the ancient school,” in Bloomer (2015a): 184–198.Google Scholar

Bo, D. (1993) Le principali problematiche del Dialogus de oratoribus: panoramica storico-critica dal 1426 al 1990. Hildesheim.Google Scholar

Bodel, J. (2015) “The publication of Pliny’s letters,” in Marchesi (2015): 13–108.Google Scholar

Bonner, S. F. (1949) Roman Declamation in the Late Republic and Early Empire. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Bonner, S. F. (1977) Education in Ancient Rome: From the Elder Cato to the Younger Pliny. Berkeley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Borda, M. (1961) “Iconografia Ciceroniana,” in Marco Tullio Cicerone: scritti nel bimillenario della morte, ed. Alfonsi, L.. Florence: 257–265.Google Scholar

Borgies, L. (2016) Le conflit propagandiste entre Octavien et Marc Antoine: de l’usage politique de la uituperatio entre 44 et 30 a. C. n. Brussels.Google Scholar

Bornecque, H. (1902) Les déclamations et les déclamateurs d’après Sénèque le père. Lille.Google Scholar

Bowersock, G. (1965) Review of Millar (1964), Gnomon 37: 469–474.Google Scholar

Boyle, A. J. (2014) Seneca: Medea. Oxford.Google Scholar

Bringmann, K. (1970) “Aufbau und Absicht des taciteischen Dialogus de oratoribus,” MH 27: 164–178.Google Scholar

Brink, C. O. (1963–1982) Horace on Poetry, 3 vols. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Brink, C. O. (1989) “Quintilian’s De causis corruptae eloquentiae and Tacitus’ Dialogus de oratoribus,” CQ n.s. 39: 472–503.Google Scholar

Brink, C. O. (1994) “Can Tacitus’ Dialogus be dated? Evidence and historical conclusions,” HSPh 96: 251–280.Google Scholar

Briscoe, J. (1998) Factorum et dictorum memorabilium libri ix, 2 vols. Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Brodersen, K. (2015) “Epitaphios: Appianos and his treasured Eutychia θησαυρίζειν τὴν εὐτυχίαν,” in Welch (2015a): 341–350.Google Scholar

Brown, P. (2000) Augustine of Hippo, 2nd edn. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Brunt, P. A. (1990) Roman Imperial Themes. Oxford.Google Scholar

Bütler, H.-P. (1970) Die geistige Welt des jüngeren Plinius: Studien zur Thematik seiner Briefe. Heidelberg.Google Scholar

Burckhardt, L. A. (1990) “Political elite of the Roman Republic: comments on recent discussion of the concepts nobilitas and homo novus,” Historia 39: 77–99.Google Scholar

Burden-Strevens, C. (2015) “Cassius Dio’s Speeches and the Collapse of the Roman Republic.” Ph.D. diss., University of Glasgow.Google Scholar

Burkard, T. (2016) “Zu den Begriffen divisio und color bei Seneca maior,” in Poignault and Schneider (2016): 83–134.Google Scholar

Butler, S. (2015) The Ancient Phonograph. New York.Google Scholar

Caplan, H. (1970) Of Eloquence: Studies in Ancient and Modern Rhetoric. Ithaca.Google Scholar

Carlon, J. (2009) Pliny’s Women: Constructing Virtues and Creating Identity in the Roman World. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Castagna, L., and Lefèvre, E. (eds.) (2003) Plinius der Jüngere und seine Zeit. Munich.Google Scholar

Cavenaile, R. (1958) Corpus papyrorum Latinarum. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar

Citroni Marchetti, S. (2016) “Cicero as role-model in the self-definition of Pliny the Elder,” in Papers of the Langford Latin Seminar, vol. xvi, ed. Cairns, F. and Gibson, R.. Oxford: 315–337.Google Scholar

Clark, A. C. (1895) Cicero: Pro Milone. Oxford.Google Scholar

Clark, A. C. (1907) Q. Asconii Pediani Orationum Ciceronis quinque enarratio. Oxford.Google Scholar

Clark, M. L. (1953) Rhetoric at Rome: A Historical Survey. London.Google Scholar

Clausen, W. V. (1994) A Commentary on Virgil: Eclogues. Oxford.Google Scholar

Coleman, K. M. (1988) Statius: Silvae iv. Oxford.Google Scholar

Coleman, K. M. (2012) “Bureaucratic language in the correspondence between Pliny and Trajan,” TAPhA 142: 189–238.Google Scholar

Coleman, R. (1977) Vergil: Eclogues. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Connolly, J. (2007) The State of Speech: Rhetoric and Political Thought in Ancient Rome. Princeton.Google Scholar

Consbruch, M. (1906) Hephaestionis Enchiridion. Leipzig.Google Scholar

Costa, C. D. N. (1969) “The ‘Dialogus,’” in Tacitus, ed. Dorey, T. A.. London: 19–34.Google Scholar

Costa, C. D. N. (1973) Seneca: Medea. Oxford.Google Scholar

Courtney, E. (1980) A Commentary on the Satires of Juvenal. London.Google Scholar

Courtney, E. (2003) The Fragmentary Latin Poets. Oxford. (Repr. of 1993 with addenda.)Google Scholar

Cousin, J. (1967) Etudes sur Quintilien, 2 vols. Amsterdam. (Repr. of Paris, 1935–1936.)Google Scholar

Cowan, E. (ed.) (2011) Velleius Paterculus: Making History. Swansea.Google Scholar

Craig, C. (2002) “A survey of selected recent work on Cicero’s rhetorica and speeches,” in May (2002): 503–531.Google Scholar

Cribiore, R. (2001) Gymnastics of the Mind: Greek Education in Hellenistic and Roman Egypt. Princeton.Google Scholar

Cribiore, R. (2015) “School structures, apparatus, and materials,” in Bloomer (2015a): 149–159.Google Scholar

Crook, J. A. (1995) Legal Advocacy in the Roman World. Ithaca.Google Scholar

Cugusi, P. (1983) Evoluzione e forme dell’epistolografia latina. Rome.Google Scholar

Cugusi, P. (1985) “Spunti di polemica politica in alcuni graffiti di Pompei e di Terracina,” ZPE 61: 23–29.Google Scholar

Cugusi, P. (2003) “Qualche riflessione sulle idee retoriche di Plinio il giovane,” in Castagna and Lefèvre (2003): 95–122.Google Scholar

Dahlmann, H. (1975) Cornelius Severus. Mainz.Google Scholar

Delleneva, J. (ed.), and Duvick, B. (trans.) (2007) Ciceronian Controversies. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

De Marco, M. (1967) Marco Tullio Cicerone: La consolazione, le orazioni spurie. Milan.Google Scholar

De Marco, M. (1991) [M. Tulli Ciceronis]: Orationes spuriae. Milan.Google Scholar

Dench, E. (2013) “Cicero and Roman identity,” in Steel (2013): 122–140.Google Scholar

Desideri, P. (1992) “I documenti di Plutarco,” ANRW ii.33.6: 4536–4567.Google Scholar

Deufert, M. (2013) “Vergilische Prosa?,” Hermes 141: 331–350.Google Scholar

Devillers, O. (ed.) (2015) Autour de Pline le Jeune: mélanges à Nicole Méthy. Bordeaux.Google Scholar

Dickey, E. (2012–2015) The Colloquia of the Hermeneumata Pseudodositheana, 2 vols. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Dienel, R. (1915) “Quintilian und der Rednersdialog des Tacitus,” WS 37: 239–271.Google Scholar

Diliberto, O. (1981) Ricerche sull’auctoramentum e sulla condizione degli auctorati. Milan.Google Scholar

D’Ippolito, G. (2000) “Il concetto di intertestualità nel pensiero degli antichi,” in Intertextualidad en las literaturas griega y latina, ed. Bécares, V., Pordomingo, F., Cortés Tovar, R., and Fernández Corte, J. C.. Madrid: 13–32.Google Scholar

Döpp, S. (1986) “Die Nachwirkung von Ciceros rhetorischen Schriften bei Quintilian und in Tacitus’ Dialogus: eine typologische Skizze,” in Reflexionen antiker Kulturen, ed. Neukam, P.. Munich: 7–26.Google Scholar

Dominik, W. (2007) “Tacitus and Pliny on oratory,” in A Companion to Roman Rhetoric, ed. Dominik, W. and Hall, J.. Malden, MA: 323–338.Google Scholar

Douglas, A. E. (1966) M. Tulli Ciceronis Brutus. Oxford.Google Scholar

Dronke, E. (1828) C. Corn. Taciti Dialogus de oratoribus. Koblenz.Google Scholar

Dugan, J. (2005) Making a New Man: Ciceronian Self-Fashioning in the Rhetorical Works. Oxford.Google Scholar

Durry, M. (1938) Panégyrique de Trajan. Paris.Google Scholar

Dyck, A. (2002) “The ‘other’ Pro Milone reconsidered,” Philologus 146: 182–185.Google Scholar

Dyck, A. (2008) Cicero: Catilinarians. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Edwards, C. (2015) “Absent presence in Seneca’s Epistles: philosophy and friendship,” in Bartsch and Schiesaro (2015): 41–53.Google Scholar

Edwards, R. (2008) “Hunting for boars with Pliny and Tacitus,” ClAnt 27: 35–58.Google Scholar

Edwards, W. A. (1928) The Suasoriae of Seneca the Elder. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Elefante, M. (1997) Ad M. Vinicium consulem libri duo. Hildesheim.Google Scholar

Ernout, A. (1962) Pseudo-Sallust: Lettres à César, Invectives. Paris.Google Scholar

Evenepoel, W. (2007) “Cicero’s Laelius and Seneca’s letters on friendship,” AC 76: 177–183.Google Scholar

Ewbank, W. W. (1933) The Poems of Cicero. London.Google Scholar

Fairweather, J. (1981) Seneca the Elder. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Fantham, E. (1978) “Imitation and decline: rhetorical theory and practice in the first century after Christ,” CPh 73: 102–116.Google Scholar

Fantham, E. (2004) The Roman World of Cicero’s De oratore. Oxford.Google Scholar

Fechner, D. (1986) Untersuchungen zu Cassius Dios Sicht der römischen Republik. Hildesheim.Google Scholar

Feddern, S. (2013) Die Suasorien des älteren Seneca: Einleitung, Text und Kommentar. Berlin.Google Scholar

Fedeli, P. (2004) “Cicerone e Seneca,” Ciceroniana 12: 217–237.Google Scholar

Feeney, D. (2014) Ovid’s Ciceronian Literary History: End-Career Chronology and Autobiography (UCL Housman Lecture). London.Google Scholar

Feldherr, A. (2013) “Free spirits: Sallust and the citation of Catiline,” AJPh 134: 49–66.Google Scholar

Fischer, J. G. (1870) “De fontibus et auctoritate Cassii Dionis in enarrandis a Cicerone post Caesaris mortem a.d. xvi Kal. Apr. de pace et Kal. Jan. anni a. Chr. n. 43 habitis orationibus.” Ph.D. diss., Leipzig.Google Scholar

Fisher, E. (1982) “Greek translation of Latin literature in the fourth century ad,” YClS 27: 173–216.Google Scholar

Flower, H. I. (2006) The Art of Forgetting: Disgrace and Oblivion in Roman Political Culture. Chapel Hill.Google Scholar

Fotheringham, L. S. (2007) “Having your cake and eating it too: how Cicero combines arguments,” in Powell (2007): 69–90.Google Scholar

Fotheringham, L. S. (2013a) “Twentieth/twenty-first-century Cicero(s),” in Steel (2013): 350–373.Google Scholar

Fotheringham, L. S. (2013b) Persuasive Language in Cicero’s Pro Milone: A Close Reading and Commentary. London.Google Scholar

Fox, M. (2007) Cicero’s Philosophy of History. Oxford.Google Scholar

Fox, M. (2013) “Cicero during the Enlightenment,” in Steel (2013): 318–336.Google Scholar

Friedrich, A. (2002) Das Symposium der xii Sapientes: Kommentar und Verfasserfrage. Berlin.Google Scholar

Fromentin, V., and Bertrand, E. (2014) Dion Cassius: Histoire romaine. Livre 47. Paris.Google Scholar

Gabba, E. (1955) Appiano e la storia delle guerre civili. Florence.Google Scholar

Gabba, E. (1957) “Note sulla polemica anticiceroniana di Asinio Pollione,” RSI 69: 317–339.Google Scholar

Galinsky, K. (1996) Augustan Culture: An Interpretive Introduction. Princeton.Google Scholar

Gallia, A. (2012) Remembering the Roman Republic: Culture, Politics, and History under the Principate. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Gamberale, L. (1997) “Dal falso al vero Cicerone: note critiche all’orazione Pridie quam in exilium iret e alla Pro Rabirio perduellionis reo, 31,” in ΜΟΥΣΑ: Scritti in onore di Giuseppe Morelli. Bologna: 331–343.Google Scholar

Gamberale, L. (1998) “Dalla retorica al centone nell’Oratio pridie quam in exilium iret: aspetti della fortuna di Cicerone fra iii e iv secolo,” in Cultura latina pagana fra terzo e quinto secolo dopo Cristo: Atti del Convegno Mantova, 9–11 ottobre 1995. Florence: 53–76.Google Scholar

Gamberini, F. (1983) Stylistic Theory and Practice in Pliny the Younger. Hildesheim.Google Scholar

Gambet, D. G. (1963) “Cicero’s Reputation from 43 bc to ad 79.” Ph.D. diss., University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar

Gambet, D. G. (1970) “Cicero in the works of Seneca philosophus,” TAPhA 101: 171–183.Google Scholar

Gates, H. L. (2009) Lincoln on Race and Slavery. Princeton.Google Scholar

Gee, E. R. (2013) “Cicero’s poetry,” in Steel (2013): 88–106.Google Scholar

Gerber, A., and Greef, A. (1877–1902) Lexicon Taciteum. Leipzig.Google Scholar

Gibson, B. (2006) Statius: Silvae 5. Oxford.Google Scholar

Gibson, R. K., and Morello, R. (2012) Reading the Letters of Pliny the Younger: An Introduction. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Gibson, R. K., and Steel, C. (2010) “The indistinct literary careers of Cicero and Pliny the Younger,” in Classical Literary Careers and their Reception, ed. Hardie, P. and Moore, H.. Cambridge: 118–137.Google Scholar

Gibson, R. K., and Whitton, C. (eds.) (2016) Oxford Readings in Classical Studies: The Epistles of Pliny. Oxford.Google Scholar

Gigante, M. (1979) Civiltà delle forme letterarie nell’antica Pompei. Naples.Google Scholar

Ginsberg, L. D. (2016) “Jocasta’s Catilinarian oration (Sen. Phoen. 632–43),” CJ 111: 483–494.Google Scholar

Glei, R. F. (2002) “Catilinas Rede gegen Cicero: literarische Fälschung, rhetorische Übung, oder politisches Pamphlet?,” NLJ 4: 155–196.Google Scholar

Goldberg, S. M. (1999) “Appreciating Aper: the defence of modernity in Tacitus’ Dialogus de oratoribus,” CQ n.s. 49: 224–237.Google Scholar

Goldberg, S. M. (2009) “The faces of eloquence: the Dialogus de oratoribus,” in The Cambridge Companion to Tacitus, ed. Woodman, A. J.. Cambridge: 73–84.Google Scholar

Goold, G. P. (1977) Manilius: Astronomica. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Goukowsky, P., and Torrens, P. (2010), Appien: Histoire romaine. Tome x, livre xv: Guerres civiles, livre iii. Paris.Google Scholar

Gowing, A. (1992) The Triumviral Narratives of Appian and Cassius Dio. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar

Gowing, A. (1998) “Greek advice for a Roman senator: Cassius Dio and the dialogue between Philiscus and Cicero (38.18–29),” in Proceedings of the Leeds Latin Seminar, vol. x, ed. Cairns, F. and Heath, M.. Leeds: 373–390.Google Scholar

Gowing, A. (2005) Empire and Memory: The Representation of the Roman Republic in Imperial Culture. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Gowing, A. (2010) “‘Caesar grabs my pen’: writing civil war under Tiberius,” in Citizens of Discord: Rome and its Civil Wars, ed. Breed, B. W., Damon, C., and Rossi, A.. Oxford: 249–260.Google Scholar

Gowing, A. (2013) “Tully’s boat: responses to Cicero in the Imperial period,” in Steel (2013): 233–250.Google Scholar

Grattarola, P. (1988) Un libello antiaugusteo: la lettera dello pseudo-Cicerone a Ottaviano. Genoa.Google Scholar

Griffin, M. T. (1976) Seneca: A Philosopher in Politics. Oxford.Google Scholar

Griffin, M. T. (1987) “Philosophy for statesmen: Cicero and Seneca,” in Antikes Denken – Moderne Schule, ed. Schmidt, H. W. and Wülfing, P.. Heidelberg: 133–150.Google Scholar

Grilli, A. (1962) Hortensius. Milan.Google Scholar

Grilli, A. (2002) “Seneca e l’Hortensius,” in Hommages à Carl Deroux, vol. ii: Prose et linguistique, médecine, ed. Defosse, P.. Brussels: 196–205.Google Scholar

Grimal, P. (1984) “Sénèque juge de Cicéron,” Mélanges de l’Ecole française de Rome – Antiquité 96: 655–670.Google Scholar

Gudeman, A. (1902) The Sources of Plutarch’s Life of Cicero. Philadelphia.Google Scholar

Gudeman, A. (1914) P. Corneli Taciti Dialogus de oratoribus. Leipzig.Google Scholar

Guillemin, A.-M. (1929) Pline et la vie littéraire de son temps. Paris.Google Scholar

Gunderson, E. (2003) Declamation, Paternity, and Roman Identity: Authority and the Rhetorical Self. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Güngerich, R. (1951) “Der Dialogus des Tacitus und Quintilians Institutio Oratoria,” CPh 46: 159–164.Google Scholar

Güngerich, R. (1980) Kommentar zum Dialogus des Tacitus. Göttingen.Google Scholar

Gurd, S. (2012) Work in Progress: Literary Revision as Social Performance in Ancient Rome. Oxford.Google Scholar

Häger, H.-J. (2015) “Das Briefcorpus des jüngeren Plinius: neuere Tendenzen in Altertumswissenschaft und Didaktik,” Gymnasium 122: 559–596.Google Scholar

Häussler, R. (1986) “Aktuelle Probleme der Dialogus-Rezeption: Echtheitserweise und Lückenumfang,” Philologus 130: 69–95.Google Scholar

Hagendahl, H. (1958) Latin Fathers and the Classics: A Study of the Apologists, Jerome, and Other Christian Writers. Gothenburg.Google Scholar

Hagendahl, H. (1967) Augustine and the Latin Fathers, 2 vols. Stockholm.Google Scholar

Hahn, I. (1968) “Geschichtsphilosophische Motive in den Reden der Emphylia,” in Studien zur Geschichte und Philosophie des Altertums, ed. Harmatta, J.. Amsterdam: 197–203.Google Scholar

Håkanson, L. (1989a) L. Annaeus Seneca Maior: Oratorum et rhetorum sententiae diuisiones colores. Leipzig.Google Scholar

Håkanson, L. (1989b) “Zu den Historikerfragmenten in Seneca d. A. Suas. 6,” in Studies in Latin Literature in Honour of C. O. Brink, ed. Diggle, J., Hall, J. B., and Jocelyn, H. D.. Cambridge: 14–19.Google Scholar

Håkanson, L. (2014) “Zu den literarischen Vorbildern der Declamationes maiores: Cicero, Seneca, Declamationes minores,” in Unveröffentlichte Schriften, vol. i: Studien zu den pseudoquintilianischen Declamationes maiores, ed. Santorelli, B.. Berlin: 15–38.Google Scholar

Hall, J. (2009) Politeness and Politics in Cicero’s Letters. Oxford.Google Scholar

Harvey, P. B. (1991) “Cicero Epistulae ad Quintum fratrem et ad Brutum: content and comment,” Athenaeum 69: 17–29.Google Scholar

Haß-von Reitzenstein, U. (1970) “Beiträge zur gattungsgeschichtlichen Interpretation des Dialogus ‘De Oratoribus.’” Ph.D. diss., Cologne.Google Scholar

Heath, M. (1999) “Longinus, On Sublimity,” PCPhS 45: 43–74.Google Scholar

Heldmann, K. (1982) Antike Theorien über Entwicklung und Verfall der Redekunst. Munich.Google Scholar

Helm, R. (1908) “Zwei Probleme des taciteischen Dialogs,” Neue Jahrbücher für das klassische Altertum, Geschichte, und deutsche Literatur und für Pädagogik 21: 474–497.Google Scholar

Henderson, J. (2001) “On Pliny on Martial on anon … (Epistles 3.21/Epigrams 10.19),” Ramus 30: 56–87.Google Scholar

Henderson, J. (2002) Pliny’s Statue: The Letters, Self-Portraiture, and Classical Art. Exeter.Google Scholar

Henderson, J. (2011) Review of Lefèvre (2009), Gnomon 83: 313–317.Google Scholar

Hercher, R. (1873) Epistolographi Graeci. Paris.Google Scholar

Herren, M. W. (2013) “Cicero redivivus apud scurras: some early medieval treatments of the great orator,” in van Deusen (2013): 39–46.Google Scholar

Higham, T. F. (1949) Some Oxford Compositions. Oxford.Google Scholar

Hildebrandt, P. (1894) De scholiis Ciceronis Bobiensibus. Berlin.Google Scholar

Hirzel, R. (1895) Der Dialogus: Ein literarhistorischer Versuch, 2 vols. Leipzig.Google Scholar

Hoffer, S. E. (1999) The Anxieties of Pliny the Younger. Atlanta.Google Scholar

Hollis, A. (2007) Fragments of Roman Poetry. Oxford.Google Scholar

Homeyer, H. (1977) “Die Quellen zu Ciceros Tod,” Helikon 17: 56–96.Google Scholar

Horsfall, N. (1989) Cornelius Nepos: A Selection. Oxford.Google Scholar

Horsfall, N. (2003). Virgil: Aeneid 11. A Commentary. Leiden.Google Scholar

Internullo, D. (2016) “P.Vindob. L 17 identificato: Cicero, In Catilinam i, 14–15 + 27,” ZPE 199: 36–40.Google Scholar

Inwood, B. (1995) “Seneca in his philosophical milieu,” HSPh 97: 63–76.Google Scholar

Inwood, B. (2007) “The importance of form in Seneca’s philosophical letters,” in Ancient Letters: Classical and Late Antique Epistolography, ed. Morello, R. and Morrison, A. D.. Oxford: 133–148.Google Scholar

Jolivet, R. (ed.) (1948) Augustine, Dialogues philosophiques: problèmes fondamentaux. Paris.Google Scholar

Jones, B. (2016) “Cassius Dio – pepaideumenos and politician on kingship,” in Cassius Dio: Greek Intellectual and Roman Politician, ed. Lange, C. and Madsen, J.. Leiden: 297–315.Google Scholar

Jones, C. P. (1968) “A new commentary on the Letters of Pliny,” Phoenix 22: 111–142.Google Scholar

Jones, C. P. (2015) “The Greek letters ascribed to Brutus,” HSPh 108: 195–244.Google Scholar

Jones, F. (1996) Nominum ratio: Aspects of the Use of Personal Names in Greek and Latin. Liverpool.Google Scholar

Kambylis, A. (1965) Die Dichterweihe und ihre Symbolik: Untersuchungen zu Hesiodos, Kallimachos, Properz und Ennius. Heidelberg.Google Scholar

Kaster, R. A. (1988) Guardians of Language: The Grammarian and Society in Late Antiquity. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Kaster, R. A. (1998) “Becoming ‘CICERO,’” in Style and Tradition: Studies in Honor of Wendell Clausen, ed. Knox, P. and Foss, C.. Stuttgart: 248–263.Google Scholar

Kaster, R. A. (2006) Cicero: Speech on Behalf of Publius Sestius. Oxford.Google Scholar

Keane, C. (2015) Juvenal and the Satiric Emotions. Oxford.Google Scholar

Keeline, T. J. (2013) “The literary and stylistic qualities of a Plinian letter: a commentary on Plin. Ep. 7.9,” HSPh 107: 229–264.Google Scholar

Keller, O. (1909–1913) Die antike Tierwelt, 2 vols. Leipzig.Google Scholar

Kemezis, A. (2014) Greek Narratives of the Roman Empire under the Severans: Cassius Dio, Philostratus, and Herodian. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Kennedy, D. F. (1992) “‘Augustan’ and ‘anti-Augustan’: reflections on terms of reference,” in Roman Poetry and Propaganda in the Age of Augustus, ed. Powell, A.. London: 26–58.Google Scholar

Kennedy, G. A. (1969) Quintilian. New York.Google Scholar

Kennedy, G. A. (1972) The Art of Rhetoric in the Roman World. Princeton.Google Scholar

Kennedy, G. A. (2002) “Cicero’s oratorical and rhetorical legacy,” in May (2002): 481–501.Google Scholar

Kennedy, G. A. (2003) Progymnasmata: Greek Textbooks of Prose Composition and Rhetoric. Leiden.Google Scholar

Ker, J. (2004) “Nocturnal writers in imperial Rome: the culture of lucubratio,” CPh 99: 209–242.Google Scholar

Kinsey, T. E. (1971) Pro P. Quinctio oratio. Melbourne.Google Scholar

Klaiber, R. (1914–1916) Die Beziehungen des Rednerdialogs von Tacitus zu Ciceros rhetorischen Schriften, 2 vols. Bamberg.Google Scholar

Kleiber, L. (1883) “Quid Tacitus in dialogo prioribus scriptoribus debeat.” Ph.D. diss., Halle.Google Scholar

Köstermann, E. (1930) “Der taciteische Dialogus und Ciceros Schrift De re publica,” Hermes 65: 396–421.Google Scholar

Kohl, R. (1915) “De scholasticarum declamationum argumentis ex historia petitis.” Ph.D. diss., Münster.Google Scholar

Koster, S. (1980) Die Invektive in der griechischen und römischen Literatur. Meisenheim am Glan.Google Scholar

Krebs, C. B. (2011) A Most Dangerous Book: Tacitus’s Germania from the Roman Empire to the Third Reich. New York.Google Scholar

Kristofferson, H. (1928) “Declamatio in L. Sergium Catilinam: Text och Tradition.” Ph.D. diss., Göteborg.Google Scholar

Kroll, W., and Skutsch, F.. (1910) W. S. Teuffels Geschichte der römischen Literatur, vol. ii, 6th edn. Leipzig.Google Scholar

Kroll, W. (1959) C. Valerius Catullus, 3rd edn. Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Kurczyk, S. (2006) Cicero und die Inszenierung der eigenen Vergangenheit: Autobiographisches Schreiben in der späten Römischen Republik. Cologne.Google Scholar

Lachenaud, G., and Coudry, M. (2011) Dion Cassius: Histoire romaine. Livres 38, 39 & 40. Paris.Google Scholar

Lamacchia, R. (1967) Epistula ad Octavianum. Milan.Google Scholar

Lamacchia, R. (1968) Epistola ad Octavianum. Florence.Google Scholar

Lamacchia, R. (1975) “Il giudizio di Tito Livio su Cicerone (Sen. ‘Suas.’ vi 22),” Studi urbinati di storia, filosofia e letteratura 49: 421–435.Google Scholar

Lamberton, R. (2001) Plutarch. New Haven.Google Scholar

Lange, A. G. (1832) Vermischte Schriften und Reden. Leipzig.Google Scholar

Lausberg, H. (trans. Bliss, M. T., Jansen, A., Orton, D. E.; ed. Orton, D. E. and Anderson, R. D.) (1998) Handbook of Literary Rhetoric: A Foundation for Literary Study. Leiden.Google Scholar

Lavery, G. B. (1965) “Cicero’s Reputation in the Latin Writers from Augustus to Hadrian.” Ph.D. diss., Fordham University.Google Scholar

Leach, E. (1990) “The politics of self-presentation: Pliny’s letters and Roman portrait sculpture,” ClAnt 9: 14–39.Google Scholar

Leeman, A. D. (1963) Orationis ratio, 2 vols. Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Leeman, A. D., and Pinkster, H. (1981) M. Tullius Cicero: De oratore Libri iii. Kommentar, vol. i. Heidelberg.Google Scholar

Leeman, A. D., Pinkster, H., and Wisse, J. (1996) M. Tullius Cicero: De oratore Libri iii. Kommentar, vol iv. Heidelberg.Google Scholar

Lefèvre, E. (2009) Vom Römertum zum Ästhetizismus: Studien zu den Briefen des jüngeren Plinius. Berlin.Google Scholar

Lentano, M. (2016) “Parlare di Cicerone sotto il governo del suo assassino: la controversia vii,2 di Seneca e la politica augustea della memoria,” in Poignault and Schneider (2016): 375–391.Google Scholar

Leo, F. (1960) Ausgewählte kleine Schriften, 2 vols., ed. Fraenkel, E.. Rome.Google Scholar

Levene, D. S. (2004) “Tacitus’ ‘Dialogus’ as literary history,” TAPhA 134: 157–200.Google Scholar

Levene, D. S. (2010) Livy on the Hannibalic War. Oxford.Google Scholar

Levick, B. (2010) Augustus: Image and Substance. Harlow.Google Scholar

Levick, B. (2011) “Velleius Paterculus as senator: a dream with footnotes,” in Cowan (2011): 1–16.Google Scholar

Lewis, R. G. (2006) Asconius: Commentaries on Speeches of Cicero. Oxford.Google Scholar

Lintott, A. W. (1974) “Cicero and Milo,” JRS 64: 62–78.Google Scholar

Lintott, A. W. (1997) “Cassius Dio and the history of the late Roman Republic,” ANRW ii.34.3: 2497–2523.Google Scholar

Lintott, A. W. (2013) Plutarch: Demosthenes and Cicero. Oxford.Google Scholar

Lobur, J. A. (2008) Consensus, Concordia, and the Formation of Roman Imperial Ideology. New York.Google Scholar

Luce, T. J. (1993) “Reading and response in the Dialogus,” in Tacitus and the Tacitean Tradition, ed. Luce, T. J. and Woodman, A. J.. Princeton: 11–38.Google Scholar

Ludolph, M. (1997) Epistolographie und Selbstdarstellung: Untersuchungen zu den “Paradebriefen” Plinius des Jüngeren. Tübingen.Google Scholar

MacCormack, S. (2013) “Cicero in late antiquity,” in Steel (2013): 251–305.Google Scholar

McDermott, W. C. (1972) “M. Cicero and M. Tiro,” Historia 21: 259–286.Google Scholar

McElduff, S. (2013) Roman Theories of Translation: Surpassing the Source. New York.Google Scholar

McGill, S. (2012) Plagiarism in Latin Literature. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Madvig, J. N. (1828) De Q. Asconii Pediani et aliorum veterum interpretum in Ciceronis orationes commentariis disputatio. Copenhagen.Google Scholar

Malcovati, H. (1945) Imperatoris Caesaris Augusti operum fragmenta, 3rd edn. Turin.Google Scholar

Mankin, D. (2011) Cicero: De oratore Book iii. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Manuwald, G. (2007) Cicero: Philippics 3–9, 2 vols. Berlin.Google Scholar

Manuwald, G. (2011) “Ciceronian praise as a step to Pliny’s Panegyricus,” in Pliny’s Praise: The Panegyricus in the Roman World, ed. Roche, P.. Cambridge: 85–103.Google Scholar

Manuwald, G. (ed.) (2016) The Afterlife of Cicero. London.Google Scholar

Marchesi, I. (2008) The Art of Pliny’s Letters: A Poetics of Allusion in the Private Correspondence. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Marchesi, I. (ed.) (2015) Pliny the Book-Maker: Betting on Posterity in the Epistles. Oxford.Google Scholar

Marincola, J. (2007) “Speeches in Greek and Roman historiography,” in A Companion to Greek and Roman Historiography, ed. Marincola, J.. Malden, MA: 118–132.Google Scholar

Marrou, H. I. (trans. Lamb, G.) (1964) A History of Education in Antiquity, 3rd edn. New York.Google Scholar

Marshall, B. A. (1985) A Historical Commentary on Asconius. Columbia, MO.Google Scholar

Martin, R. H. (1972) Review of Haß-von Reitzenstein (1970), CR n.s. 22: 356–357.Google Scholar

Martin, R. H., and Woodman, A. J. (1989) Tacitus: Annals Book iv. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Martín Sanchez, M. A. F. (1989) “Cicerón en Seneca: las citas del pensador cordobés sobre el orador romano,” Myrtia 4: 117–125.Google Scholar

Maurach, G. (1970) Der Bau von Senecas Epistulae Morales. Heidelberg.Google Scholar

May, J. M. (1988) Trials of Character: The Eloquence of Ciceronian Ethos. Chapel Hill.Google Scholar

May, J. M. (ed.) (2002) Brill’s Companion to Cicero: Oratory and Rhetoric. Leiden.Google Scholar

May, J. M., and Wisse, J. (2001) Cicero: On the Ideal Orator. Oxford.Google Scholar

Mayer, R. (2001) Dialogus de oratoribus. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Mayer, R. (2003) “Pliny and gloria dicendi,” Arethusa 36: 227–234.Google Scholar

Mazzoli, G. (1964) “Il frammento enniano laus alit artis e il proemio al xvi libro degli Annales,” Athenaeum 42: 307–315.Google Scholar

Mazzoli, G. (1970) Seneca e la poesia. Milan.Google Scholar

Melchior, A. (2008) “Twinned fortunes and the publication of Cicero’s Pro Milone,” CPh 103: 282–297.Google Scholar

Merguet, H. (1877–1884) Lexikon zu den Reden des Ciceros, 4 vols. Jena.Google Scholar

Merklin, H. (1991) “‘Dialogus’-Probleme in der neueren Forschung: Überlieferungsgeschichte, Echtheitsbeweis, und Umfang der Lücke,” ANRW ii.33.3: 2255–2283.Google Scholar

Merwald, G. (1964) “Die Buchkomposition des jüngeren Plinius (Epistulae i–ix).” Ph.D. diss., Erlangen.Google Scholar

Méthy, N. (2007) Les lettres de Pline le Jeune: une représentation de l’homme. Paris.Google Scholar

Meyer, P. (1881) Untersuchung über die Frage der Echtheit des Briefwechsels Cicero ad Brutum. Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Michel, A. (1962) Le “Dialogue des orateurs” de Tacite et la philosophie de Cicéron. Paris.Google Scholar

Migliario, E. (2007) Retorica e storia: una lettura delle Suasorie di Seneca padre. Bari.Google Scholar

Migliario, E. (2008) “Cultura politica e scuole di retorica a Roma in età augustea,” in Retorica ed educazione delle élites nell’antica Roma: Atti della vi Giornata ghisleriana di filologia classica, Pavia, 4–5 aprile 2006, ed. Gasti, F. and Romano, E.. Pavia: 77–93.Google Scholar

Millar, F. (1961) “Some speeches in Cassius Dio,” MH 18: 11–22.Google Scholar

Millar, F. (1964) Cassius Dio. Oxford.Google Scholar

Millnor, K. (2014) Graffiti and the Literary Landscape in Roman Pompeii. Oxford.Google Scholar

Mindt, N. (2013) Martials epigrammatischer Kanon. Munich.Google Scholar

Moles, J. (1988) Plutarch: Life of Cicero. Warminster.Google Scholar

Moles, J. (1997) “Plutarch, Brutus and Brutus’ Greek and Latin letters,” in Plutarch and his Intellectual World, ed. Mossman, J.. London: 141–168.Google Scholar

Moles, J. (1998) “Cry freedom: Tacitus Annals 4.32–35,” Histos 2: 1–54.Google Scholar

Morello, R. (2003) “Pliny and the art of saying nothing,” Arethusa 36: 187–209.Google Scholar

Moreno Soldevila, R. (2010) Panegírico de Trajano. Madrid.Google Scholar

Moreschini, C. (1977) “Cicerone filosofo fonte di Seneca,” RCCM 19: 527–534.Google Scholar

Morgan, T. (1998) Literate Education in the Hellenistic and Roman Worlds. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Morstein-Marx, R. (2004) Mass Oratory and Political Power in the Late Roman Republic. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Müller, H. (2015) “Challenges to classical education in Late Antiquity: the case of Augustine of Hippo,” in Bloomer (2015a): 358–371.Google Scholar

Murgia, C. E. (1979) “The length of the lacuna in Tacitus’ ‘Dialogus,’” ClAnt 12: 221–240.Google Scholar

Murgia, C. E. (1980) “The date of Tacitus’ Dialogus,” HSPh 84: 99–125.Google Scholar

Murgia, C. E. (1985) “Pliny’s letters and the Dialogus,” HSPh 89: 171–206.Google Scholar

Narducci, E. (ed.) (2003a) Aspetti della fortuna di Cicerone nella cultura latina: Atti del iii Symposium Ciceronianum Arpinas. Florence.Google Scholar

Narducci, E. (2003b) “Cicerone nella ‘Pharsalia’ di Lucano,” in Narducci (2003a): 78–91.Google Scholar

Neger, M. (2015) “Pliny’s Martial and Martial’s Pliny: the intertextual dialogue between the Letters and the Epigrams,” in Devillers (2015): 131–144.Google Scholar

Nicholson, J. (1998) “The survival of Cicero’s letters,” in Studies in Latin Literature and Roman History ix, ed. Deroux, C.. Brussels: 63–105.Google Scholar

Nisbet, R. G. M. (1961) In L. Calpurnium Pisonem oratio. Oxford.Google Scholar

Noè, E. (1984) Storiografia imperiale pretacitiana: linee di svolgimento. Florence.Google Scholar

Norden, E. (1958) Die antike Kunstprosa vom vi. Jahrhundert v. Chr. bis in die Zeit der Renaissance, 5th edn., 2 vols. Darmstadt.Google Scholar

Noreña, C. F. (2007) “The social economy of Pliny’s correspondence with Trajan,” AJPh 128: 239–277.Google Scholar

Novokhatko, A. A. (2009) The Invectives of Sallust and Cicero: Critical Edition with Introduction, Translation, and Commentary. Berlin.Google Scholar

Nutting, H. C. (1926) “Cicero and the Younger Pliny,” CJ 21: 420–430.Google Scholar

O’Donnell, J. (1980) “Augustine’s classical readings,” RecAug 15: 144–175.Google Scholar

Ogilvie, R. M., and Richmond, I. A. (1967) De vita Agricolae. Oxford.Google Scholar

Opelt, I. (1965) Die lateinischen Schimpfwörter und verwandte sprachliche Erscheinungen: Eine Typologie. Heidelberg.Google Scholar

O’Sullivan, N. (1992) Alcidamas, Aristophanes and the Beginnings of Greek Stylistic Theory. Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Otto, A. (1890) Die Sprichwörter und sprichwörtlichen Redensarten der Römer. Leipzig.Google Scholar

Paratore, E. (1951) Tacito. Milan.Google Scholar

Passelac, M. (1972) “Le bronze d’applique de Fendeille,” Revue archéologique de Narbonnaise 5: 185–190.Google Scholar

Patillon, M. (1998) Aelius Théon: Progymnasmata. Paris.Google Scholar

Pausch, D. (ed.) (2010) Stimmen der Geschichte: Funktionen von Reden in der antiken Historiographie. Berlin.Google Scholar

Peirano, I. (2012) The Rhetoric of the Roman Fake: Latin Pseudepigrapha in Context. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Pelliccia, H. (2010–2011). “Unlocking Aeneid 6.460: Plautus’ Amphitryon, Euripides’ Protesilaus and the referents of Callimachus’ Coma,” CJ 106: 149–219.Google Scholar

Pelling, C. (1988) Plutarch: Life of Antony. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Pelling, C. (2002) Plutarch and History: Eighteen Studies. Swansea.Google Scholar

Pelling, C. (2011a) Plutarch: Caesar. Oxford.Google Scholar

Pelling, C. (2011b) “Velleius and biography: the case of Julius Caesar,” in Cowan (2011) 157–176.Google Scholar

Peter, H. (1901) Der Brief in der römischen Litteratur. Leipzig.Google Scholar

Petzold, P. (1911) “De Ciceronis obtrectatoribus et laudatoribus Romanis.” Ph.D. diss., Leipzig.Google Scholar

Pflips, H. (1973) “Ciceronachahmung und Ciceroferne des jüngeren Plinius: ein Kommentar zu den Briefen des Plinius über Repetundenprozesse.” Ph.D. diss., Münster.Google Scholar

Pieper, C. (2014) “Memoria saeptus: Cicero and the mastery of memory in his (post-)consular speeches,” SO 88: 42–69.Google Scholar

Pierini, R. Degl’Innocenti (2003) “Cicerone nella prima età imperiale: luci ed ombre su un martire della repubblica,” in Narducci (2003a): 3–54.Google Scholar

Pinney, T. (1974–1981) The Letters of Thomas Babington Macaulay, 6 vols. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Plasberg, O. (1892) “De M. Tullii Ciceronis Hortensio dialogo.” Ph.D. diss., Leipzig.Google Scholar

Poignault, R., and Schneider, C. (eds.) (2016) Fabrique de la déclamation antique (controverses et suasoires). Lyons.Google Scholar

Pomeroy, A. J. (1991) The Appropriate Comment: Death Notices in the Ancient Historians. Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar

Potts, A. W. (1886) Hints towards Latin Prose Composition. London.Google Scholar

Powell, J. (ed.) (2007) Logos: Rational Argument in Classical Rhetoric. London.Google Scholar

Radice, B. (1969) Letters and Panegyricus of Pliny, 2 vols. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Rawson, E. (1985) Intellectual Life in the Late Roman Republic. London.Google Scholar

Rees, W. (2011) “Cassius Dio, Human Nature, and the Late Roman Republic.” Ph.D. diss., University of Oxford.Google Scholar

Reinhardt, T., and Winterbottom, M. (2006) Quintilian: Institutio oratoria Book 2. Oxford.Google Scholar

Reinhold, M. (1984) Classica Americana: The Greek and Roman Heritage in the United States. Detroit.Google Scholar

Reuters, A. (1887) “De Quintiliani libro qui fuit De causis corruptae eloquentiae.” Ph.D. diss., Breslau.Google Scholar

Reynolds, L. D. (ed.) (1983) Texts and Transmission: A Survey of the Latin Classics. Oxford.Google Scholar

Rich, J. (2011) “Velleius’ History: genre and purpose,” in Cowan (2011): 73–92.Google Scholar

Rich, J. (2015) “Appian, Polybius, and the Romans’ war with Antiochus the Great: a study in Appian’s sources and methods,” in Welch (2015a): 65–124.Google Scholar

Richard, C. (2015) “Cicero and the American founders,” in Altman (2015a): 124–143.Google Scholar

Richter, W. (1968) “Das Cicerobild der römischen Kaiserzeit,” in Cicero: Ein Mensch seiner Zeit, ed. Radke, G.. Berlin: 161–197.Google Scholar

Riggsby, A. M. (1995) “Pliny on Cicero and oratory: self-fashioning in the public eye,” AJPh 116: 123–135.Google Scholar

Robb, M. A. (2010) Beyond Populares and Optimates: Political Language in the Late Republic. Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Roca-Puig, R. (1977) Ciceró: Catilinàries (i et ii in Cat.). Barcelona.Google Scholar

Rochette, B. (1997) Le latin dans le monde grec: recherches sur la diffusion de la langue et des lettres latines dans les provinces hellénophones de l’Empire romain. Brussels.Google Scholar

Rolim de Moura, A. (2010) “Lucan 7: speeches at war,” in Lucan’s Bellum civile: Between Epic Tradition and Aesthetic Innovation, ed. Hömke, N. and Reitz, C.. Berlin.Google Scholar

Roller, M. (1997) “Color-blindness: Cicero’s death, declamation, and the production of history,” CPh 92: 109–130.Google Scholar

Roller, M. (2015) “The dialogue in Seneca’s Dialogues (and other moral essays),” in Bartsch and Schiesaro (2015): 54–67.Google Scholar

Romano, D. (1965) “Il significato della pseudo-ciceroniana ‘Epistula ad Octavianum,’” in Studi in memoria di Carmelo Sgroi. Turin: 593–604.Google Scholar

Roos, P. (1984) Sentenza e proverbio nell’antichità e i ‘Distichi di Catone’: il testo latino e i volgarizzamenti italiani. Brescia.Google Scholar

Rudd, N. (1992) “Strategems of vanity: Cicero, Ad familiares 5.12 and Pliny’s letters,” in Author and Audience in Latin Literature, ed. Woodman, A. J. and Powell, J.. Cambridge: 18–32.Google Scholar

Ruebel, J. S. (1979) “The trial of Milo in 52 bc: a chronological study,” TAPhA 109: 231–249.Google Scholar

Russell, D. A. (1970) Longinus: On the Sublime. Oxford.Google Scholar

Russell, D. A. (1979) “De imitatione,” in Creative Imitation and Latin Literature, ed. West, D. and Woodman, A. J.. Cambridge: 1–16.Google Scholar

Russell, D. A. (2001) Quintilian: Institutio oratoria, 5 vols. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Sabbadini, R. (1885) Storia del Ciceronianismo. Turin.Google Scholar

Sailor, D. (2008) Writing and Empire in Tacitus. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Sánchez-Ostiz, Á. (2013) “Cicero Graecus: notes on Ciceronian papyri from Egypt,” ZPE 187: 144–153.Google Scholar

Sandys, J. E. (1885) Ad Marcum Brutum orator. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Santangelo, F. (2012) “Authoritative forgeries: late Republican history re-told in pseudo-Sallust,” Histos 6: 27–51.Google Scholar

Schafer, J. (2011) “Seneca’s Epistulae morales as dramatized education,” CPh 106: 32–52.Google Scholar

Scheidegger Lämmle, C. (2017) “Last words: Cicero’s late works and the poetics of a literary legacy,” in Self-Presentation and Identity in the Roman World, ed. Gavrielatos, A.. Newcastle upon Tyne: 17–36.Google Scholar

Schenk, P. (1999) “Formen von Intertextualität im Briefkorpus des jüngeren Plinius,” Philologus 143: 114–134.Google Scholar

Schenk, P. (2016) “Forms of intertextuality in the Epistles of Pliny the Younger,” in Gibson and Whitton (2016): 332–354. (Trans. of Schenk [1999].)Google Scholar

Schilling, R. (1977) Pline l’Ancien: Histoire naturelle. Livre vii. Paris.Google Scholar

Schmeling, G. (2011) A Commentary on the Satyrica of Petronius. Oxford.Google Scholar

Schmidt, O. E. (1884) “Zur Kritik und Erklärung der Briefe Ciceros an M. Brutus,” Neue Jahrbücher für classische Philologie 129: 617–644.Google Scholar

Schmitzer, U. (2000) Velleius Paterculus und das Interesse an der Geschichte im Zeitalter des Tiberius. Heidelberg.Google Scholar

Schurgacz, K. (2004) Die Declamatio in L. Sergium Catilinam: Einleitung, Übersetzung, Kommentar. Trier.Google Scholar

Scott, K. (1933) “The political propaganda of 44–30 bc,” Memoirs of the American Academy in Rome 11: 7–49.Google Scholar

Seager, R. (1972) “Cicero and the word popularis,” CQ n.s. 22: 328–338.Google Scholar

Sedley, D. (1997) “The ethics of Brutus and Cassius,” JRS 87: 41–53.Google Scholar

Setaioli, A. (1965) “Esegesi virgiliana in Seneca,” SIFC 37: 133–156.Google Scholar

Setaioli, A. (1976) “On the date of publication of Cicero’s Letters to Atticus,” SO 51: 105–120.Google Scholar

Setaioli, A. (2000) Facundus Seneca: aspetti della lingua e dell’ideologia senecana. Bologna.Google Scholar

Setaioli, A. (2003) “Seneca e Cicerone,” in Narducci (2003a): 55–77.Google Scholar

Setaioli, A. (2014) “Epistulae morales,” in Brill’s Companion to Seneca: Philosopher and Dramatist, ed. Damschen, G. and Heil, A.. Leiden: 191–200.Google Scholar

Shackleton Bailey, D. R. (1965–1970) Cicero: Epistulae ad Atticum, 7 vols. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Shackleton Bailey, D. R. (1971) Cicero. New York.Google Scholar

Shackleton Bailey, D. R. (1977) Cicero: Epistulae ad familiares, 2 vols. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Shackleton Bailey, D. R. (1980) Cicero: Epistulae ad Quintum fratrem et M. Brutum. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Shackleton Bailey, D. R. (1982) “Notes on Tacitus’ opuscula,” CJ 77: 255–258.Google Scholar

Shackleton Bailey, D. R. (2002) Cicero: Letters to Quintus and Brutus, Letter Fragments, Letter to Octavian, Invectives, Handbook of Electioneering. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Shanzer, D. (2012) “Augustine and the Latin classics,” in A Companion to Augustine, ed. Vessey, M.. Malden, MA: 161–174.Google Scholar

Shelford, A. (2007) Transforming the Republic of Letters: Pierre-Daniel Huet and European Intellectual Life, 1650–1720. Rochester.Google Scholar

Sherwin-White, A. N. (1966) The Letters of Pliny: A Historical and Social Commentary. Oxford.Google Scholar

Sillett, A. (2015) “‘A Learned Man and a Patriot’: The Reception of Cicero in the Early Imperial Period.” Ph.D. diss., University of Oxford.Google Scholar

Sillett, A. (2016) “Quintus Cicero’s Commentariolum: a philosophical approach to Roman elections,” in Splendide mendax: Rethinking Fakes and Forgeries in Classical, Late Antique, and Early Christian Culture, ed. Cueva, E. P. and Martínez, J.. Groningen: 177–191.Google Scholar

Sion-Jenkis, K. (2000) Von der Republik zum Prinzipat: Ursachen für den Verfassungswechsel in Rom im historischen Denken der Antike. Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Skidmore, C. (1996) Practical Ethics for Roman Gentlemen: The Work of Valerius Maximus. Exeter.Google Scholar

Smith, M. S. (1975) Petronii Arbitri Cena Trimalchionis. Oxford.Google Scholar

Soubiran, J. (2002) Cicéron: Aratea. Fragments poétiques. Paris.Google Scholar

Springer, C. (2018) Cicero in Heaven: The Roman Rhetor and Luther’s Reformation. Leiden.Google Scholar

Stadter, P. A. (2006) “Pliny and the ideology of Empire,” Prometheus 32: 61–76.Google Scholar

Stangl, T. (1886) “Die bibliothek Ashburnham,” Philologus 45: 201–236.Google Scholar

Stangl, T. (1964) Ciceronis orationum scholiastae. Hildesheim. (Repr. of Vienna 1912.)Google Scholar

Steel, C. (2005) Reading Cicero: Genre and Performance in Late Republican Rome. London.Google Scholar

Steel, C. (ed.) (2013) The Cambridge Companion to Cicero. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Stekelenburg, A. V. van (1971) “De Redevoeringen bij Cassius Dio.” Ph.D. diss., Leiden.Google Scholar

Stone, A. M. (1980) “Pro Milone: Cicero’s second thoughts,” Antichthon 14: 88–111.Google Scholar

Stramaglia, A. (2016) “Il maestro nascosto: elementi ‘metaretorici’ nelle Declamazioni Maggiori pseudo-quintilianee,” in Poignault and Scheider (2016): 21–47.Google Scholar

Stroh, W. (1975) Taxis und Taktik: Die advokatische Dispositionskunst in Ciceros Gerichtsreden. Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Summers, W. C. (1910) Select Letters of Seneca. London.Google Scholar

Sussman, L. (1978) The Elder Seneca. Leiden.Google Scholar

Suster, G. (1890) “De Plinio Ciceronis imitatore,” RFIC 18: 74–86.Google Scholar

Syme, R. (1939) The Roman Revolution. Oxford.Google Scholar

Syme, R. (1958) Tacitus. Oxford.Google Scholar

Syme, R. (1964) Sallust. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Syme, R. (1968) “People in Pliny,” JRS 58: 135–151. Reprinted in Roman Papers, vol. ii, ed. E. Badian, Oxford: 694–723.Google Scholar

Syme, R. (1991) “Pliny’s early career,” in Roman Papers, vol. vii, ed. Birley, A. R.. Oxford: 551–567.Google Scholar

Taldone, A. (1993) “Su insania e furor in Cicerone,” BStudLat 23: 3–19.Google Scholar

Testard, M. (1958) Saint Augustin et Cicéron, 2 vols. Paris.Google Scholar

Thomas, B. P. (2009) Abraham Lincoln: A Biography. Carbondale, IL.Google Scholar

Too, Y. L. (2001) “Introduction,” in Pedagogy and Power: Rhetorics of Classical Learning, ed. Too, Y. L. and Livingstone, N.. Cambridge: 1–16.Google Scholar

Torraca, L. (1959) Marco Giunio Bruto: Epistole greche. Naples.Google Scholar

Tunberg, T. (2012) De rationibus quibus homines docti artem Latine colloquendi et ex tempore dicendi saeculis xvi et xvii coluerunt. Leuven.Google Scholar

Tzounakas, S. (2013) “Martial’s Pliny as quoted by Pliny (Epist. 3.21),” C&M 64: 247–268.Google Scholar

Tzounakas, S. (2015) “Pliny the Younger as the Roman Demosthenes,” in Devillers (2015): 207–218.Google Scholar

Uden, J. (2015) The Invisible Satirist: Juvenal and Second-Century Rome. Oxford.Google Scholar

Usener, H. (1873) “Vergessenes,” RhM 28: 391–435.Google Scholar

van den Berg, C. (2006) “The Social Aesthetics of Tacitus’ Dialogus de oratoribus.” Ph.D. diss., Yale University.Google Scholar

van den Berg, C. (2014) The World of Tacitus’ Dialogus de oratoribus: Aesthetics and Empire in Ancient Rome. Cambridge.Google Scholar

van den Berg, C., and Baraz, Y. (eds.) (2013) Intertextuality and its Discontents (AJPh 134). Baltimore.Google Scholar

van den Hout, M. J. P. (1999) A Commentary on the Letters of M. Cornelius Fronto. Leiden.Google Scholar

van der Blom, H. (2010) Cicero’s Role Models: The Political Strategy of a Newcomer. Oxford.Google Scholar

van der Blom, H. (2016a) Oratory and Political Career in the Late Roman Republic. Cambridge.Google Scholar

van der Blom, H. (2016b) “Creating a great orator: the self-portrait and reception of Cicero the orator,” in Autorretratos: la creación de la imagen personal en la Antigüedad, ed. Fernández, A. D.. Barcelona: 87–99.Google Scholar

van der Poel, M. (2009) “The use of exempla in Roman declamation,” Rhetorica 27: 332–353.Google Scholar

van Deusen, N. (ed.) (2013) Cicero Refused to Die: Ciceronian Influence through the Centuries. Leiden.Google Scholar

van Mal-Maeder, D. (2007) La fiction des déclamations. Leiden.Google Scholar

Vasaly, A. (1993) Representations: Images of the World in Ciceronian Oratory. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Vogt-Spira, G. (2003) “Die Selbstinszenierung des jüngeren Plinius,” in Castagna and Lefèvre (2003): 51–68.Google Scholar

Volk, K. (2013) “The genre of Cicero’s De consulatu suo,” in Generic Interfaces in Latin Literature: Encounters, Interactions and Transformations, ed. Papanghelis, T. D., Harrison, S. J., and Frangoulidis, S.. Berlin: 93–112.Google Scholar

Volk, K., and Zetzel, J. E. G. (2015) “Laurel, tongue and glory (Cicero, De consulatu suo fr. 6 Soubiran),” CQ n.s. 65: 204–223.Google Scholar

Vretska, K. (1961) Sallust: Invektive und Episteln, 2 vols. Heidelberg.Google Scholar

Vretska, K. (1976) De Catilinae coniuratione, 2 vols. Heidelberg.Google Scholar

Wallace-Hadrill, A. F. (1984) Suetonius: The Scholar and his Caesars. New Haven.Google Scholar

Ward, J. O. (2015) “What the Middle Ages missed of Cicero, and why,” in Altman (2015a): 307–328.Google Scholar

Weil, B. (1962) 2000 Jahre Cicero. Zürich.Google Scholar

Weische, A. (1989) “Plinius d. J. und Cicero: Untersuchungen zur römischen Epistolographie in Republik und Kaiserzeit,” ANRW ii.33.1: 375–386.Google Scholar

Welch, K. (ed.) (2015a) Appian’s Roman History: Empire and Civil War. Swansea.Google Scholar

Welch, K. (2015b) “Programme and narrative in Civil Wars 2.118–4.138,” in Welch (2015a): 277–304.Google Scholar

Westall, R. (2015) “The sources for the Civil Wars of Appian of Alexandria,” in Welch (2015a): 125–168.Google Scholar

White, H. (1912) Appian’s Roman History, 4 vols. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Whitton, C. (2013a) Pliny the Younger: Epistles Book ii. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Whitton, C. (2013b) “Trapdoors: false closure in Pliny,” in The Door Ajar: False Closure in Greek and Roman Literature and Art, ed. Grewing, F., Acosta-Hughes, B., and Kirichenko, A.. Heidelberg: 43–61.Google Scholar

Whitton, C. (2015a) “Grand designs: unrolling Epistles 2,” in Marchesi (2015): 109–143.Google Scholar

Whitton, C. (2015b) “Pliny on the precipice (Ep. 9.26),” in Devillers (2015): 217–236.Google Scholar

Whitton, C. (2015c) “Pliny’s progress: on a troublesome Domitianic career,” Chiron 45: 1–22.Google Scholar

Whitton, C. (2018) “Quintilian, Pliny, Tacitus,” in Literary Interactions under Nerva, Trajan, and Hadrian, ed. König, A. R. and Whitton, C.. Cambridge: 37–62.Google Scholar

Wibier, M. (2016) “Cicero’s reception in the juristic tradition of the early Empire,” in Cicero’s Law, ed. du Plessis, P. J.. Edinburgh: 100–122.Google Scholar

Wilkins, A. S. (1888) M. Tulli Ciceronis De oratore libri tres. Oxford.Google Scholar

Williams, Gareth (2003) Seneca: De otio; De brevitate vitae. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Williams, Gareth (2015) “Style and form in Seneca’s writing,” in Bartsch and Schiesaro (2015): 135–149.Google Scholar

Williams, Gordon (1978) Change and Decline: Roman Literature in the Early Empire. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Wilson, M. (1987) “Seneca’s Epistles to Lucilius: a revaluation,” Ramus 16: 102–121.Google Scholar

Wilson, M. (2001) “Seneca’s Epistles reclassified,” in Texts, Ideas, and the Classics: Scholarship, Theory, and Classical Literature, ed. Harrison, S. J.. Oxford: 164–187.Google Scholar

Wilson, M. (2008) “Your writings or your life: Cicero’s Philippics and declamation,” in Cicero’s Philippics: History, Rhetoric and Ideology, ed. Stevenson, T. and Wilson, M.. Auckland: 305–334.Google Scholar

Winkler, J. (1988) “Juvenal’s attitude toward Ciceronian poetry and rhetoric,” RhM 131: 84–97.Google Scholar

Winterbottom, M. (1964) “Quintilian and the vir bonus,” JRS 54: 90–97.Google Scholar

Winterbottom, M. (1974) Seneca the Elder: Declamations, 2 vols. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Winterbottom, M. (1982) “Cicero and the Silver Age,” in Eloquence et rhétorique chez Cicéron, ed. Ludwig, W.. Geneva: 237–274.Google Scholar

Winterbottom, M. (1984) The Minor Declamations Ascribed to Quintilian. Berlin.Google Scholar

Wirszubski, C. (1950) Libertas as a Political Idea at Rome during the Late Republic and Early Principate. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Wiseman, T. P. (1971) New Men in the Roman Senate 139 bc–ad 14. Oxford.Google Scholar

Wiseman, T. P. (2009) Remembering the Roman People. Oxford.Google Scholar

Wisse, J. (2002) “De oratore: rhetoric, philosophy, and the making of the ideal orator,” in May (2002): 375–400.Google Scholar

Wisse, J. (2007) “The riddle of the Pro Milone: the rhetoric of rational argument,” in Powell (2007): 35–68.Google Scholar

Wölfflin, E. (1933) “Zur Alliteration,” in Eduard Wölfflin: Ausgewählte Schriften, ed. Meyer, G.. Leipzig: 225–284.Google Scholar

Woerther, F. (2015) Caecilius de Calè-Actè: fragments et témoignages. Paris.Google Scholar

Wolff, E. (2004) “Pline et Cicéron: quelques remarques,” in Epistulae Antiquae iii: Actes du iii^e colloque international “L’épistolaire antique et ses prolongements européens,” ed. Nadjo, L. and Gavoille, E.. Leuven: 441–447.Google Scholar

Wolverton, R. (1964) “The encomium of Cicero in Pliny the Elder,” in Classical, Mediaeval, and Renaissance Studies in Honor of Berthold Louis Ullman, ed. Henderson, C. Jr. Rome: 159–164.Google Scholar

Woodman, A. J. (1983) Velleius Paterculus: The Caesarian and Augustan Narrative (2.41–93). Cambridge.Google Scholar

Woodman, A. J. (1988) Rhetoric in Classical Historiography: Four Studies. London.Google Scholar

Woodman, A. J. (2012) “Pliny on writing history: Epistles 5.8,” in From Poetry to History: Selected Papers, ed. Woodman, A. J.. Oxford: 223–242.Google Scholar

Woodman, A. J. (2014) Tacitus: Agricola. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Woolf, G. (2006) “Pliny’s province,” in Rome and the Black Sea Region: Domination, Romanisation, Resistance, ed. Bekker-Nielsen, T.. Aarhus: 93–108.Google Scholar

Woolf, G. (2015) “Pliny/Trajan and the poetics of Empire,” CPh 110: 132–151.Google Scholar

Wooten, C. (1977) “Cicero’s reactions to Demosthenes: a clarification,” CJ 73: 37–43.Google Scholar

Wooten, C. (1997) “Cicero and Quintilian on the style of Demosthenes,” Rhetorica 15: 177–192.Google Scholar

Wright, A. I. (1997) “Cicero Reflected: The Image of a Statesman in the Century after his Death, and its Ideological Significance.” Ph.D. diss., University of Sydney.Google Scholar

Wright, A. I. (2001) “The death of Cicero. Forming a tradition: the contamination of history,” Historia 50: 436–452.Google Scholar

Yavetz, Z. (1990) “The personality of Augustus: reflections on Syme’s Roman Revolution,” in Between Republic and Empire: Interpretations of Augustus and his Principate, ed. Raaflaub, K. and Toher, M.. Berkeley: 21–41.Google Scholar

Zanker, P. (trans. Shapiro, A.) (1988) The Power of Images in the Age of Augustus. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar

Zetzel, J. E. G. (1974) “Statilius Maximus and Ciceronian studies in the Antonine Age,” BICS 21: 107–123.Google Scholar

Zetzel, J. E. G. (1995) Cicero: De re publica. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Zetzel, J. E. G. (2013) “Political philosophy,” in Steel (2013): 181–195.Google Scholar

Zielinski, T. (1929) Cicero im Wandel der Jahrhunderte, 4th edn. Leipzig.Google Scholar

Zucker, F. (1929) “Plin. epist. viii 24 – ein Denkmal antiker Humanität,” Philologus 84: 209–232.Google Scholar