Adam, C., and Tannery, P. (eds.) (1965), René Descartes: Oeuvres Complètes, Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar

Adams, J. S. (1963), ‘Wage inequities, productivity and work quality’, Industrial Relations 3: 9–16.Google Scholar

Adams, J. S. (1965), ‘Inequity in social exchange’, in: Berkowitz, L. (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol. II, New York: Academic Press, 267–99.Google Scholar

Adams, J. S., and Rosenbaum, W. B. (1964), ‘The relationship of worker productivity to cognitive dissonance about wage inequalities’, Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 69: 19–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adolphs, R. (2000), ‘Social cognition and the human brain’, Trends in Cognitive Science 3: 469–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Akerlof, G. (1982), ‘Labor contract as partial gift exchange’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 97: 543–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alesina, A., and Ferrara, E. (2000a), ‘Participation in heterogeneous communities’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 115 (3): 847–904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alesina, A., and Ferrara, E. (2000b), Who Trusts Others?, Discussion Paper no. 2646, Centre for Economic Policy Research, London.Google Scholar

Alesina, A., and Ferrara, E. (2002), ‘Who trusts others?’, Journal of Public Economics 85 (2), 207–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Altman, I. (1973), ‘Reciprocity of interpersonal exchange’, Journal of Theory of Social Behaviour 3: 249–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ames, R., and Marwell, G. (1979), ‘Experiments on the provision of public goods: resources, interest, group size, and the free-rider problem’, American Journal of Sociology 84: 1335–60.Google Scholar

Andreoni, J. (1988a), ‘Privately provided public goods in a large economy: the limits of altruism’, Journal of Public Economics 35 (1): 57–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Andreoni, J. (1988b), ‘Why free ride? Strategies and learning in public goods experiments’, Journal of Public Economics 37 (3): 291–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Andreoni, J. (1989), ‘Giving with impure altruism: applications to charity and Ricardian equivalence’, Journal of Political Economy 97: 1447–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Andreoni, J. (1990), ‘Impure altruism and donations to public goods: a theory of warm-glow giving’, Economic Journal 100: 464–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Andreoni, J. (1995), ‘Warm-glow versus cold-prickle: the effects of positive and negative framing on cooperation in experiments’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 110 (1): 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Archibald, G. C., and Donaldson, D. (1976), ‘Non-paternalism and the basic theorems of welfare economics’, Canadian Journal of Economics 9: 492–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aronfreed, J. (1970), ‘The socialization of altruistic and sympathetic behavior: some theoretical and experimental analyses’, in: Macaulay, J. and Berkowitz, L. (eds.), Altruism and Helping Behavior, New York: Academic Press, 103–26.Google Scholar

Aronfreed, J., and Paskal, V. (1965), ‘Altruism, empathy, and the conditioning of positive affect’, unpublished manuscript, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar

Arrow, K. J. (1972), ‘Gifts and exchanges’, Philosophy and Public Affairs1: 343–62.Google Scholar

Arrow, K. J. (1979), Optimal and Voluntary Income Distribution, Technical Report no. 288 (Economic Series), Institute for Mathematical Studies in the Social Sciences, Stanford University, CA., and in (1981), Economic Welfare and the Economics of Soviet Socialism: Essays in Honor of Abram Bergson, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 267–88.Google Scholar

Axelrod, R. (1981), ‘Emergence of cooperation among egoists’, American Political Science Review 75: 306–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Axelrod, R. (1984), The Evolution of Cooperation, New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Banks, S. (1979), ‘Gift-giving: a review and an interactive paradigm’, in: Wilkie, W. (ed.), Advances in Consumer Research, vol. VI, Ann Arbor: Michigan Association for Consumer Research, 319–24.Google Scholar

Baron, J. N. (1988), ‘The employment relation as a social relation’, Journal of the Japanese and International Economies 2: 492–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Basu, K. (1977), ‘Information and strategy in iterated prisoners’ dilemma’, Theory and Decision 8: 293–8.Google Scholar

Basu, K. (1987), ‘Modelling finitely repeated games with uncertain termination’, Economic Letters 23: 147–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Becker, G. S. (1961), Notes on an Economic Analysis of Philanthropy, working paper, National Bureau of Economic Research, New York.Google Scholar

Becker, G. S. (1974), ‘A theory of social interaction’, Journal of Political Economy 82 (6): 1063–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Becker, G. S. (1976a), ‘Altruism, egoism and genetic fitness: economics and sociobiology’, Journal of Economic Literature 14: 817–26.Google Scholar

Becker, G. S. (1976b), The Economic Approach to Human Behavior, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Becker, G. S. (1981), ‘Altruism in the family and selfishness in the market place’, Econometrica 48: 1–15.Google Scholar

Becker, H. (1956a), ‘Empathy, sympathy and Scheler’, International Journal of Sociometry1: 15–22.Google Scholar

Becker, H. (1956b), Man in Reciprocity: Introductory Lectures on Culture, Society and Personality, New York: Praeger.Google Scholar

Benabou, R., and Tirole, J. (2003), ‘Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation’, Review of Economic Studies 70 (3): 489–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ben-Porath, Y. (1980), ‘The F-connection: families, friends, and firms and the organization of exchange’, Population and Development Review 6: 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bentham, J. (1789), Principles of Morals and Legislation, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Bereby-Meyer, Y., and Niederle, M. (2005), ‘Fairness in bargaining’, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 56 (2): 173–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berg, J., Dickhaut, J. and K. A. McCabe, (1995), ‘Trust, reciprocity and social history’, Games and Economic Behavior 10: 122–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bergstrom, T. C. (1970), ‘A “Scandinavian consensus” solution for efficient income distribution among non-malevolent consumers’, Journal of Economic Theory 2: 383–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berkowitz, L. (1966), ‘A laboratory investigation of social class and national differences in helping behavior’, International Journal of Psychology1.Google Scholar

Berkowitz, L. (1968), ‘Responsibility, reciprocity, and social distance in help-giving: an experimental investigation of English social class differences’, Journal of Experimental Psychology 4: 46–63.Google Scholar

Berkowitz, L. (1970), ‘The self, selfishness and altruism’, in: Macaulay, J and Berkowitz, L. (eds.), Altruism and Helping Behavior, New York: Academic Press, 143–54.Google Scholar

Berkowitz, L. (1971), ‘Social norms, feelings and other factors affecting helping behavior and altruism’, unpublished manuscript, University of Wisconsin.Google Scholar

Berkowitz, L., and Daniels, L. (1963), ‘Responsibility and dependency’, Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 66: 429–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berkowitz, L., and Friedman, P. (1967), ‘Some social class differences in helping behavior’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 5: 217–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bernheim, B. D., Shleifer, A. and Summers, L. H. (1985), ‘The strategic bequest motive’, Journal of Political Economy 93: 1045–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bewley, T. F. (1995), ‘A depressed labor market as explained by participants’, American Economic Review 85 (2): 250–4.Google Scholar

Bewley, T. F. (1999), ‘Work motivation’, Review of the Federal Reserve Bank of St Louis 81 (3): 35–50.Google Scholar

Bianchi, M. (1993), ‘How to learn sociality: true and false solutions to Mandeville's problem’, History of Political Economy 25 (2): 209–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Binmore, K., McCarthy, J., Ponti, G., Samuelson, L. and Shaked, A. (2002), ‘A backward induction experiment’, Journal of Economic Theory 104 (1): 48–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bishop, J. (1987), ‘The recognition and reward of employee performance’, Journal of Labor Economics 5: S36–S56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boehm, C. (1993), ‘Egalitarian behavior and reverse dominance hierarchy’, Current Anthropology 34 (3): 227–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bolton, G., Brandts, J. and Ockenfels, A. (1998), ‘Measuring motivations for the reciprocal responses observed in simple dilemma games’, Experimental Economics 1 (3): 207–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bolton, G. and Ockenfels, A. (1998), ‘Strategy and equity: an ERC-analysis of the Güth–van Damme game’, Journal of Mathematical Psychology 42 (2): 215–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bolton, G. and Ockenfels, A. (2000), ‘ERC: a theory of equity, reciprocity and competition’, American Economic Review 90 (1): 166–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boudon, R. (1979), La logique du social, Paris: Hachette.Google Scholar

Boulding, K. (1973), The Economy of Love and Fear, Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar

Bowles, S. (1998), ‘Endogenous preferences: the cultural consequences of markets and other economic institutions’, Journal of Economic Literature 36 (1): 75–111.Google Scholar

Bryan, J. H., and Test, M. A. (1967), ‘Models and helping: naturalistic studies in aiding behavior’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 6: 400–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buchan, N., Croson, R. and Dawes, R. (2002), Swift Neighbors and Persistent Strangers: A Cross-Cultural investigation of Trust and Reciprocity in Social Exchange, paper presented at the Microeconomic Seminar, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, 17 December.Google Scholar

Camerer, C. (1988), ‘Gifts as economic signals and social symbols’, American Journal of Sociology 94: 5180–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Campbell, D. T. (1965), ‘Ethnocentric and other altruistic motives’, in: Levine, D. (ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 283–311.Google Scholar

Carmichael, H. L., and Macleod, W. B. (1997), ‘Gift giving and the evolution of cooperation’, International Economic Review 38 (3): 485–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Charness, G., and Haruvy, E. (2002), ‘Altruism, equity, and reciprocity in a gift-exchange experiment: an encompassing approach’, Games and Economic Behavior 40 (2): 203–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Charness, G., and Rabin, M. (2002), ‘Understanding social preferences with simple tests’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 117 (3): 817–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cialdini, R. C., and M. R. Trost (1998), ‘Social influence: social norms, conformity, and compliance’, in: Gilbert, D. T., Fiske, S. T. and Lindzey, G. (eds.), The Handbook of Social Psychology, Boston: McGraw-Hill, 151–85.Google Scholar

Coate, S., and Ravallion, M. (1993), ‘Reciprocity without commitment’, Journal of Economic Development 40: 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Collard, D. (1978), Altruism and the Economy: A Study in Non-Selfish Economics, Oxford: Martin Robertson.Google Scholar

Coricelli, G., K. McCabe and V. Smith (2000), ‘Theory-of-mind mechanism in personal exchange’, in: Hotano, G., Okada, N. and Tanabe, H. (eds.), Affective Minds, Amsterdam: Elsevier, 249–59.Google Scholar

Cox, J. C. (2004), ‘How to identify trust and reciprocity’, Games and Economic Behavior 46 (2): 260–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Croson, R. T. A. (1999), Theories of Altruism and Reciprocity: Evidence from Linear Public Good Games, discussion paper, Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar

Daly, G., and Giertz, F. (1972), ‘Welfare economics and welfare reform’, American Economic Review 62 (1): 131–8.Google Scholar

Danner, P. L. (1973), ‘Sympathy and exchangeable value: keys to Adam Smith's social philosophy’, Review of Social Economy 34 (3): 317–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Darwin, C. (1871 [1981]), La descendance de l'homme, et la sélection sexuelle (trans. Barbier, E.), Brussels: Editions Complexe.Google Scholar

Dasgupta, P. (2000), ‘Economic progress and the idea of social capital’, in: Dasgupta, P. and Serageldin, I. (eds.), Social Capital: A Multifaceted Perspective, World Bank: Washington, DC, 325–424.Google Scholar

Davis, J. (1975), ‘The particular theory of exchange’, Archives Européennes de Sociologie 16 (2): 151–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dawes, R., and Thaler, R. (1982), ‘Cooperation’, Journal of Economic Perspectives 2: 187–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dawes, R. M., Kragt, A. J. C. and Orbell, J. M. (1988), ‘Not me or thee but we: the importance of group identity in eliciting cooperation in dilemma situations’, Acta Psychologica 68: 83–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Doland, D., and Adelberg, K. (1967), ‘The learning of sharing behavior’, Child Development 38: 695–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dufwenberg, M., and Kirchsteiger, G. (2004), ‘A theory of sequential reciprocity’, Games and Economic Behavior 47 (2): 268–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Durkheim, E. (1958), Professional Ethics and Civic Morals (trans. C. Brookfield), Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar

Edgeworth, F. Y. (1881), Mathematical Psychics: An Essay on the Application of Mathematics to the Moral Sciences, London: London School of Economics.Google Scholar

Eglar, Z. E. (1958), Vartan Bhanji: Institutionalized Reciprocity in a Changing Punjab Village, PhD thesis, Columbia University NY.Google Scholar

Ekstein, R. (1972), ‘Psychoanalysis and education for the facilitation of positive human qualities’, Journal of Social Issues 28 (3): 71–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Elster, J. (1989), The Cement of Society: A Study of Social Order, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Elster, J. (1998), ‘Emotions and economic theory’, Journal of Economic Literature 36: 47–74.Google Scholar

Elster, J. (2007), Disinterestedness, Lectures at the College de France.Google Scholar

Elster, J. (forthcoming), Le Désintéressement, Paris: Editions du Seuil.Google Scholar

Falk, A., Fehr, E. and Fischbacher, U. (2000), Informal Sanctions, Working Paper no. 59, Institute for Empirical Research in Economics, University of Zurich.Google Scholar

Falk, A., Fehr, E. and Fischbacher, U. (2003), ‘On the nature of fair behavior’, Economic Inquiry 41 (1): 20–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Falk, A., and Fischbacher, U. (1999), A Theory of Reciprocity, Working Paper no. 6, Institute for Empirical Research in Economics, University of Zurich.Google Scholar

Falk, A., and Fischbacher, U. (2001), A Theory of Reciprocity, Discussion Paper no. 3014, Centre for Economic Policy Research, London.Google Scholar

Falk, A., and U. Fischbacher (2005), ‘Modeling strong reciprocity’, in: Gintis, H., Bowles, S., Boyd, R. and Fehr, E. (eds.), Moral Sentiments and Material Interests: The Foundations of Cooperation in Economic Life, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 193–214.Google Scholar

Fehr, E., and Gächter, S. (1998), ‘How effective are trust- and reciprocity-based incentives?’, in: A. Ben-Ner and L. Putterman, Economics, Values and Organizations, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 337–63.Google Scholar

Fehr, E., and Gächter, S. (2000a), ‘Fairness and retaliation: the economics of reciprocity’, Journal of Economic Perspectives 14 (3): 159–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fehr, E., and Gächter, S. (2000b), ‘Cooperation and punishment in public goods experiments’, American Economic Review 90 (4): 980–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fehr, E., and Gächter, S. (2002), Do Incentive Contracts Crowd out Voluntary Cooperation?, Working Paper no. 34, University of Zurich.Google Scholar

Fehr, E., Gächter, S. and Kirchsteiger, G. (1996), ‘Reciprocal fairness and noncompensating wage differentials’, Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 152 (4): 608–40.Google Scholar

Fehr, E., Gächter, S. and Kirchsteiger, G. (1997), ‘Reciprocity as a contract enforcement device: experimental evidence’, Econometrica 65 (4): 833–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fehr, E., Kirchler, E., Weichbold, A. and Gächter, S. (1998), ‘When social norms overpower competition: gift exchange in experimental labor markets’, Journal of Labor Economics 16 (2): 324–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fehr, E., Kirchsteiger, G. and Riedl, A. (1993), ‘Does fairness prevent market clearing? An experimental investigation’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 108 (2): 437–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fehr, E., and Schmidt, K. M. (1999), ‘A theory of fairness, competition and cooperation’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 114 (3): 817–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fehr, E., and Schmidt, K. M. (2002), ‘Fairness, incentives, and contractual choices’, European Economic Review 44 (4–6): 1057–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fehr, E., and K. M. Schmidt (2003), ‘Theories of fairness and reciprocity: evidence and economic applications’, in: Dewatripont, M., Hansen, L. P. and Turnovsky, S. J. (eds.), Advances in Economics and Econometrics: 8th World Congress. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 208–57.Google Scholar

Fellner, C. H., and J.-R. Marshall (1970), ‘Kidney donors’, in: Macaulay, J. and Berkowitz, L. (eds.), Altruism and Helping Behavior, New York: Academic Press, 269–81.Google Scholar

Firth, R. (ed.) (1957), Man and Culture: An Evaluation of the Work of Bronislaw Malinowski, New York: Humanities Press.Google Scholar

Fischbacher, U., Gächter, S. and Fehr, E. (1999), Are People Conditionally Cooperative? Evidence from a Public Good Experiment, Working Paper no. 16, Institute for Empirical Research in Economics, University of Zurich.Google Scholar

Frank, R. H. (1988), Passions within Reason: The Strategic Role of the Emotions, New York: Norton.Google Scholar

Frank, R. H. (1990), ‘A theory of moral sentiments’, in: Mansbridge, J. (ed.), Beyond Self-Interest, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 71–96.Google Scholar

Freuchen, P. (1961), Book of the Eskimos, Cleveland and New York: World Publishing.Google Scholar

Frey, B. (1997), Not Just for the Money: An Economic Theory of Personal Motivation, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Friedrichs, R. W. (1960), ‘Alter versus ego: an exploratory assessment of altruism’, American Sociological Review 25: 496–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frisch, D. M., and Greenberg, M. S. (1968), ‘Reciprocity and intentionality in the giving of help’, in: Proceedings of the 76th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, vol. III, Washington, DC: American Psychological Assocciation, 383–4.Google Scholar

Gächter, S., and Falk, A. (2002), ‘Population and reciprocity: consequences for the labour relation’, Scandinavian Journal of Econometrics104: 1–27.Google Scholar

Geanakoplos, J., Pearce, D. and Stacchetti, E. (1989), ‘Psychological games and sequential rationality’, Games and Economic Behavior 1 (1): 60–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gérard-Varet, L.-A., Kolm, S.-Ch. and Ythier, J. Mercier (eds.) (2000), The Economics of Reciprocity, Giving and Altruism, London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gergen, K. J., Gergen, M. and Meter, K. (1972), ‘Individual orientations to prosocial behavior’, Journal of Social Issues 28 (3): 105–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gergen, K. J., , M. S. Greenberg and Willis, R. H. (eds.) (1980), Social Exchange: Advances in Theory and Research, New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gide, C. (1905), Economie sociale, Paris: Librairie de la Société du Recueil général des lois et des arrêts.Google Scholar

Gintis, H. (2000), ‘Strong reciprocity and human sociality’, Journal of Theoretical Biology 206: 169–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gintis, H., Bowles, S., Boyd, R. and Fehr, E. (eds.) (2005), Moral Sentiments and Material Interests: The Foundations of Cooperation in Economic Life, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Glaeser, E. L., Laibson, D., Scheinkman, J. A. and Sautter, C. I. (2000), ‘Measuring trust’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 115: 811–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goeree, J. K., and Holt, C. A. (2000), ‘Asymmetric inequality aversion and noisy behaviour in alternating-offer bargaining games’, European Economic Review 44 (4–6): 1079–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldfarb, R. S. (1970), ‘Pareto optimal redistribution: comment’, American Economic Review 60 (4): 994–6.Google Scholar

Goodstadt, M. S. (1971), ‘Helping and refusal to help: a test of balance and reactance theories’, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 7: 610–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goranson, R. E., and Berkowitz, L. (1966), ‘Reciprocity and responsibility reactions to prior help’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 3: 227–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gouldner, A. (1960), ‘The norm of reciprocity: a preliminary statement’, American Sociological Review 25: 161–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Greenberg, J. (1978), ‘Effects of reward value and retaliative power on allocation decisions: justice, generosity or greed?’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 36: 367–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Greenberg, M. S. (1980), ‘A theory of indebtedness’, in: Gergen, K. J., Greenberg, M. S. and Willis, R. H. (eds.), Social Exchange: Advances in Theory and Research, New York: Plenum Press 2–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Greenberg, M. S., and Frisch, D. (1972), ‘Effect of intentionality on willingness to reciprocate a favor’, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 8: 99–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Greenglass, E. R. (1969), ‘Effects of prior help and hindrance on willingness to help another: reciprocity or social responsibility’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 11: 224–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gregory, C. A. (1982), Gifts and Commodities, London: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Gregory, C. A. (1987), ‘Gifts’, in: Eatwell, J., Milgate, M. and Newman, P. (eds.), The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics, London: Mackmillan, 524–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gui, B. (2000), ‘Beyond transactions: on the interpersonal dimension of economic reality’, Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics 71 (2): 139–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gui, B., and Sugden, R. (eds.) (2005), Economics and Social Interaction: Accounting for Interpersonal Relations, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Güth, W. (1995a), ‘An evolutionary approach to explaining cooperative behavior by reciprocal incentives’, International Journal of Game Theory 24 (4): 323–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Güth, W. (1995b), ‘On ultimatum bargaining experiments a personal review’, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 27 (3): 329–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Güth, W., Ockenfels, P. and Wendel, M. (1977), ‘Cooperation based on trust: an experimental investigation’, Journal of Economic Psychology 18: 15–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Güth, W., Schmitterberger, R. and Schwarze, B. (1982), ‘An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining’, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 3: 367–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Güth, W., and M. E. Yaari (1992), ‘An evolutionary approach to explain reciprocal behavior in a simple strategic game’, in: Witt, U. (ed.), Explaining Process and Change: Approaches to Evolutionary Economics, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 23–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guttman, J. M. (2000), ‘On the evolutionary stability of preferences for reciprocity’, European Journal of Political Economy 16 (1): 31–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guyer, P. (1993), Kant and the Experience of Freedom, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hamilton, W. D. (1971), ‘Selection of selfish and altruistic behavior in some extreme models’, in: Eisenberg, J. F. and Dillon, W. S. (eds.), Man and Beast: Comparative Social Behavior, Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press, 57–91.Google Scholar

Hammond, P. (1975), ‘Charity: altruism or cooperative egoism?’, in: Phelps, E. (ed.), Altruism, Morality, and Economic Theory, New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 115–32.Google Scholar

Handlon, B. J., and Gross, P. (1959), ‘The development of sharing behavior’, Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 59: 425–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hardin, G. (1968), ‘The tragedy of the commons’, Science 162: 1243–8.Google Scholar

Harris, L. A. (1967), ‘A study of altruism’, Elementary School Journal 68: 135–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harris, M. (1970), ‘Reciprocity and generosity: some determinants of sharing behavior’, Child Development 41: 313–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hartmann, H. (1960), Psychoanalysis and Moral Values, New York: International Universities Press.Google Scholar

Heider, F. (1958), The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations, New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Helliwell, J. F., and Putnam, R. D. (1999), Education and Social Capital, Working Paper no. 7121, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.

Henrich, J., Boyd, R., Bowles, S., Gintis, H., Fehr, E., McElreath, R. and Camerer, C. (2001), ‘In search of Homo economicus: behavioral experiments in 15 small-scale societies’, American Economic Review 91 (2): 73–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Herold, F. (2003), Carrot or Stick? Group Selection and the Evolution of Reciprocal Preferences. Discussion Paper 2003–05, Department of Economics, University of Munich.Google Scholar

Hobhouse, L. T. (1906 [1951]), Morals in Evolution: A Study in Comparative Ethics, London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar

Hochman, H. M., and Rodgers, J. D. (1969), ‘Pareto optimal redistribution’, American Economic Review 59 (3): 542–57.Google Scholar

Hoffman, E., and Spitzer, M. L. (1982), ‘The Coase theorem: some experimental tests’, Journal of Law and Economics 95: 73–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hoffman, M. (1970), ‘Moral development’, in: Mussen, P. (ed.), Carmichael's Manual of Child Development, New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Holesovsky, V. (1977), Economic System Analysis and ComparisonTokyo: McGraw-Hill, Kogakusha.Google Scholar

Holländer, H. (1990), ‘A social exchange approach to voluntary cooperation’, American Economic Review 80 (5): 1157–67.Google Scholar

Holmstrom, B., and Milgrom, P. (1991), ‘Multitask principal–agent analyses: incentive contracts, asset ownership, and job design’, Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 7 (Special issue): 24–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Homans, G. (1958), ‘Social behavior as exchange’, American Journal of Sociology 68: 597–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hornstein, H. A. (1970), Experiments in the Social Psychology of Prosocial Behavior: Final Report, Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.Google Scholar

Hornstein, H. A., Fisch, E. and Holmes, M. (1968), ‘Influence of a model's feelings about his behavior and his relevance as a comparison on the observers’ helping behavior’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 10: 222–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Isaac, M. R., McCue, K. F. and Plott, C. (1985), ‘Public goods provision in an experimental environment’, Journal of Public Economics 26: 51–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Isaac, M. R., and Walker, J. M. (1988a), ‘Communication and free-riding behavior: the voluntary contribution mechanism’, Economic Inquiry 26: 585–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Isaac, M. R., and Walker, J. M. (1988b), ‘Group size effects in public goods provision: the voluntary contribution mechanism’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 103: 179–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Isaac, M. R., Walker, J. M. and Thomas, S. H. (1984), ‘Divergent evidence on free riding: an experimental examination of possible explanations’, Public Choice 43 (2): 113–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Isaac, M. R., Walker, J. M. and Williams, A. M. (1994), ‘Group size and the voluntary provision of public goods: experimental evidence utilizing large groups’, Journal of Public Economics 75: 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Isen, A. M., and Levin, P. F. (1972), ‘Effect of feeling good on helping: cookies and kindness’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 21: 384–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kahneman, D., and Knetsch, J. L. (1992), ‘Valuing public goods: the purchase of moral satisfaction’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 22 (1): 57–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L. and Thaler, R. H. (1986a), ‘Fairness as a constraint on profit seeking: entitlements in the market’, American Economic Review 76 (3): 728–41.Google Scholar

Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L. and Thaler, R. H. (1986b), ‘Fairness and the assumptions of economics’, Journal of Business 59: S285–S300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kant, I. (1790 [1952]), Critique of Judgement (ed. and trans. Meredith, J. C.), Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Kant, I. (1797 [1991]), The Metaphysic of Morals (trans. Gregor, M. J.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Keser, C., and Winden, F. (2000), ‘Conditional cooperation and voluntary contributions to public goods’, Scandinavian Journal of Economics 102 (1): 23–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kim, O., and Walker, M. (1984), ‘The free rider problem: experimental evidence’, Public Choice 43 (1): 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kimball, M. (1988), ‘Farmer's cooperatives as behavior toward risk’, American Economic Review 78 (1): 224–32.Google Scholar

Knack, S., and P. Keefer, (1997), ‘Does social capital have an economic payoff? A cross-country investigation’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 112: 1251–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kolm, S.-C. (1959), Les hommes du Fouta-Toro, Saint-Louis, Senegal: MAS.Google Scholar

Kolm, S.-Ch. (1966), ‘The optimal production of social justice’, International Economic Association Conference on Public Economics, Biarritz, proceedings, H. Guitton and J. Margolis, eds. Reproduced in (1968), Economie Publique (Paris: CNRS) 109–77, and (1969), Public Economics(London: Macmillan) 145–200.Google Scholar

Kolm, S.-Ch. (1971), Justice et équité, Paris: CEPREMAP. (Reprint 1972, Paris: CNRS). [Published in English 1998, Justice and Equity (trans. H. F. See), Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.]Google Scholar

Kolm, S.-Ch. (1973), La théorie de la réciprocité, Paris: CEPREMAP.Google Scholar

Kolm, S.-Ch. (1975), La réciprocité générale, Paris: CEPREMAP.Google Scholar

Kolm, S.-Ch. (1976), ‘Unequal inequalities’, Journal of Economic Theory, Part I, 12: 416–42; Part II, 13: 82–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kolm, S.-Ch. (1977), ‘Multidimensional egalitarianism’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 91: 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kolm, S.-Ch. (1979), Fondements de la théorie du don, de la réciprocité, et du choix des systèmes économiques, Paris: CEPREMAP.Google Scholar

Kolm, S.-Ch. (1980), ‘Psychanalyse et théorie des choix’, Social Science Information 19 (2): 269–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kolm, S.-Ch. (1981a), ‘Altruisme et efficacité: le sophisme de Rousseau’, Social Science Information 20: 293–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kolm, S.-Ch. (1981b), ‘Efficacité et altruisme: le sophisme de Mandeville, Smith et Pareto’, Revue Economique 32: 5–31.Google Scholar

Kolm, S.-Ch. (1982), Le Bonheur-Liberté (Bouddhisme Profond et Modernité), Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar

Kolm, S.-Ch. (1983a), ‘Altruism and efficiency’, Ethics 94: 18–65. Reprinted in Zamagni, S. (ed.), The Economics of Altruism, op. cit.Google Scholar

Kolm, S.-Ch. (1983b), ‘Introduction à la réciprocité générale’, Social Science Information 22 (4–5) 569–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kolm, S.-Ch. (1984a), La Bonne Economie: la Réciprocité Générale, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar

Kolm, S.-Ch. (1984b), ‘Théorie de la réciprocité et du choix des systèmes économiques’, Revue Economique 35: 871–910.Google Scholar

Kolm, S.-Ch. (1985), Le Contrat Social Liberal, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar

Kolm, S.-Ch. (1986), ‘Is only egoism productive?’, Development3.Google Scholar

Kolm, S.-Ch. (1987), ‘Public economics’, in: Eatwell, J., M. Milgate and P. Newman (eds.), The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics, London: Macmillan, 1047–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kolm, S.-Ch. (1989), ‘Le devoir général de réciprocité’, Revue d'Ethique et de Théologie Morale 168 (supplement: Les Devoirs de l'Homme): 135–46.Google Scholar

Kolm, S.-Ch. (1990), ‘Employment and fiscal policies with a realistic view of the social role of wages’, in: Champsaur, P., Deleau, M., Grandmont, J.-M., Guesnerie, R., Henry, C., Laffont, J.-J., Laroque, G., Mairesse, J., Monfort, A. and Younes, Y. (eds.), Edmond Malinvaud: Essays in His Honor, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 226–86.Google Scholar

Kolm, S.-Ch. (1992), ‘Reciprocity’, Political Economy of the Good Society Newsletter 2 (Summer): 1–6.Google Scholar

Kolm, S.-Ch. (1994), ‘The theory of reciprocity and of the choice of economic systems’, Investigaciones Económicas 18 (1): 67–95.Google Scholar

Kolm, S.-Ch. (1995), ‘The theory of social sentiments: the case of envy’, Japanese Economic Review 1 (46): 63–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kolm, S.-Ch. (1996a), Modern Theories of Justice, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Kolm, S.-Ch. (1996b), ‘The theory of justice’, Social Choice and Welfare 13: 151–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kolm, S.-Ch. (1998), ‘Une introduction à la théorie de la réciprocité et du choix des systèmes économiques’, in: Mahieu, F.-R. and Rapoport, H. (eds.), Altruisme: Analyses Economiques, Paris: Economica 17–50.Google Scholar

Kolm, S.-Ch. (1999), ‘Rational foundations of income inequality measurement’, in: Silber, J., Handbook on Income Inequality Measurement, Boston: Kluwer Academic, 19–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kolm, S.-Ch. (2000a), ‘Introduction to the economics of reciprocity, giving and altruism’, in: Gérard-Varet, L.-A., Kolm, S.-C. and Ythier, J. Mercier (eds.), The Economics of Reciprocity, Giving and Altruism, London: Macmillan, 1–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kolm, S.-Ch. (2000b), ‘The theory of reciprocity’, in: Gérard-Varet, L.-A., Kolm, S.-C. and Ythier, J. Mercier (eds.), The Economics of Reciprocity, Giving and Altruism, London: Macmillan, 1115–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kolm, S.-Ch. (2000c), ‘The logic of good social relations’, Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics 72 (2): 171–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kolm, S.-Ch. (2004), Macrojustice: The Political Economy of Fairness, New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kolm, S.-Ch. (2005), ‘The logic of good social relations’, in: B. Gui, and Sugden, R. (eds.), Economics and Social Interaction: Accounting for Interpersonal Relations, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, chap. 8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kolm, S.-Ch. (2006), ‘Introduction to the economics of giving, altruism and reciprocity’, in: Kolm, S.-C. and Ythier, J. Mercier (eds.), Handbook of the Economics of Giving, Altruism and Reciprocity, 1–122.Google Scholar

Kolm, S.-Ch. (2008), ‘The paradox of the alleviation of poverty, joint giving and efficient transfers’, mimeo.Google Scholar

Kolm, S-Ch., and Mercier Ythier, J. (eds.) (2006), Handbook of the Economics of Giving, Altruism and Reciprocity, Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Company.Google Scholar

Kolpin, V. (1993), ‘Equilibrium refinements in psychological games’, Games and Economic Behavior 4 (2): 218–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kranich, L. J. (1998), ‘Altruism and efficiency: a welfare analysis of the Walrasian mechanism with transfers’, Journal of Public Economics 36: 369–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kranton, R. E. (1996), ‘Reciprocal exchange: a self-sustaining system,’American Economic Review 86 (4): 830–51.Google Scholar

Kreps, D. M. (1997), ‘Intrinsic motivation and extrinsic incentives,’American Economic Review 87 (2): 359–64.Google Scholar

Kreps, D. M., Milgrom, P., Roberts, J. and Wilson, R. (1982), ‘Rational cooperation in the finitely repeated prisoners’ dilemma’, Journal of Economic Theory 27 (2): 245–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kropotkin, P. (1892), La conquête du pain, Paris: Tresse and Stock.Google Scholar

Kropotkin, P. (1896), ‘Co-operation: a reply to Herbert Spencer, part 1’, Freedom 13 (12).Google Scholar

Kropotkin, P. (1897), ‘Co-operation: a reply to Herbert Spencer, part 2’, Freedom 14 (1).Google Scholar

Kropotkin, P. (1902 [1972]), Mutual Aid: A Factor of Evolution, London: Penguin.Google Scholar

Kropotkin, P. (1913), La Science Moderne et l'Anarchie, Paris: Stock.Google Scholar

Kropotkin, P. (1927), L'Ethique, Paris: Stock.Google Scholar

Kurz, M. (1978a), ‘Altruism as an outcome of social interaction’, American Economic Review 68 (2): 216–22.Google Scholar

Kurz, M. (1978b), ‘Altruism as an outcome of social interaction’, Journal of Public Economics 36: 369–86.Google Scholar

Kurz, M. (1979), ‘Altruistic equilibrium’, in: Balassa, B. and Nelson, R. (eds.), Economic Progress, Private Values and Policy, Amsterdam: North-Holland, 177–200.Google Scholar

Lambert, P. (2001), The Distribution and Redistribution of Income, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Landa, J. T. (1994), Trust, Ethnicity and Identity: Beyond the New Institutional Economics of Ethnic Trading Networks, Contract Law, and Gift-Exchange, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Latané, B., and Darley, J. (1970), The Unresponsive Bystander: Why Doesn't He Help?, New York: Appleton-Century-Croft.Google Scholar

Ledyard, J. (1995), ‘Public goods: a survey of experimental research’, in: Roth, A. and Kagel, J. (eds.), Handbook of Experimental Economics, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 111–94.Google Scholar

Leeds, R. (1963), ‘Altruism and the norm of giving’, Merrill-Palmer Quarterly 9: 229–40.Google Scholar

Lenrow, P. (1965), ‘Studies in sympathy’, in: Tomlins, S. S. and Izard, C. E. (eds.), Affect, Cognition, and Personality: Empirical Studies, New York: Springer, 264–94.Google Scholar

Leventhal, G. S., and Anderson, D. (1970), ‘Self-interest and the maintenance of equity’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 15: 57–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leventhal, G. S., Weiss, T. and Long, G. (1969), ‘Equity, reciprocity and reallocating rewards in the dyad’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 13: 300–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levine, D. K. (1991), You Get What You Pay for: Tests of Efficiency Wage Theories in the United States and Japan, Working Paper no. 1054, University of California, Berkeley, Institute of Industrial Relations.Google Scholar

Levine, D. K. (1993), ‘Fairness, markets, and ability to pay: evidence from compensation executives’, American Economic Review 83 (5): 1241–59.Google Scholar

Levine, D. K. (1997), ‘Modeling altruism and spitefulness in experiments’, Review of Economic Dynamics 1 (3): 593–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lévi-Strauss, C. (1949), ‘The principle of reciprocity’, in: Coser, L. A. and Rosenberg, G. (eds.), New York: Macmillan, Sociological Theory: A Book of Readings, 84–94.

Lindbeck, A., and Weibull, J. (1988), ‘Altruism and time consistency: the economics of the fait accompli’, Journal of Political Economy 96: 1165–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lindbeck, A., Nyberg, S. and Weibull, J. (1999), ‘Social norms and economic incentives in the welfare state’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 116 (1): 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Macaulay, J., and Berkowitz, L. (eds.) (1970), Altruism and Helping Behavior, New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Malinowski, B. (1932), Crime and Custom in Savage Society, London: Paul, Trench, Trubner.Google Scholar

Mandeville, B. (1705), The Grumbling Hive, or: Knaves Turn'd Honest, London.Google Scholar

Mandeville, B. (1714), The Fable of the Bees, or: Private Vices, Publick Benefits, London.Google Scholar

Margolis, H. (1981), Selfishness, Altruism and Rationality, Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Marwell, G., and Ames, R. (1979), ‘Experiments on the provision of public goods: resources, interest, group size, and the free-rider problem’, American Journal of Sociology 84: 1335–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marwell, G., and Ames, R. (1981), ‘Economists free ride, does anyone else? Experiments on the provision of public goods, Ⅳ’, Journal of Public Economics 15: 295–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mauss, M. (1924), ‘Essai sur le don, forme archaïque de l’échange’, Année Sociologique n.s. 1: 30–186. (English trans., The Gift: Forms and Function of Exchange in Archaic Societies, 1967, New York: Norton).Google Scholar

McCabe, K. A., Rassenti, S. J. and Smith, V. L. (1996), ‘Game theory and reciprocity in some extensive form experimental games’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 93 (23): 13, 421–8.Google Scholar

McCabe, K. A., Rassenti, S. J. and Smith, V. L. (1998), ‘Reciprocity, trust, and payoff privacy in extensive form bargaining’, Games and Economic Behavior 24 (1–2): 10–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mead, G. H. (1934), Mind, Self and Society, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Meidinger, C. (2000), ‘Equity, fairness equilibria and coordination in the ultimatum game’, in: Gérard-Varet, L.-A., Kolm, S.-C. and Ythier, J. Mercier (eds.), The Economics of Reciprocity, Giving and Altruism, London: Macmillan, 142–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mercier Ythier, J. (1993), ‘Equilibre général de dons individuels’, Revue Economique 44 (5): 925–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mercier Ythier, J. (1998), ‘The distribution of wealth in the liberal social contract’, European Economic Review 42: 329–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Merton, R. (1957), Social Theory and Social Structure, New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Midlarsky, E. (1968), ‘Aiding responses: an analysis and review’, Merrill-Palmer Quarterly 14: 229–60.Google Scholar

Miller, A. A. (ed.) (1970), Selected Writings on Anarchism and Revolution, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Miller, D. (1988), ‘Altruism and the welfare state’, in: Moon, J. Donald (ed.), Responsibility, Rights, and Welfare: The Theory of the Welfare State, Boulder, Co, and London: Westview Press, 163–88.Google Scholar

Mishan, E. J. (1972), ‘The futility of Pareto-efficient distribution’, American Economic Review 62 (4): 971–6.Google Scholar

Morelly, (1755 [1953]), Code de la Nature, Paris: Editions sociales.Google Scholar

Morris, W. (1890 [1993]), News from Nowhere and Other Writings, London: Penguin.Google Scholar

Musgrave, R. A. (1970), ‘Pareto optimal redistribution: comment’, American Economic Review 60 (5): 991–3.Google Scholar

Nagel, T. (1970), The Possibility of Altruism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Nagel, T. (1986), The View from Nowhere, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Neuberger, E., and Duffy, W. (1976), Comparative Economic Systems: A Decision-Making Approach, Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar

Nicole, P. (1675), Essais de Morale, Paris.Google Scholar

Offer, A. (1997), ‘Between the gift and the market: the economy of regard’, Economic History Review 50 (3): 450–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Olsen, E. O. (1971), ‘Some theorems in the theory of efficient transfers’, Journal of Political Economy 79: 166–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Orbell, J., and Wilson, L. A. (1978), ‘Institutional solutions to the N-prisoners’ dilemma’, American Political Science Review 72: 411–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Orbell, J. M., Dawes, R. M. and Kragt, A. J. C. (1978), ‘Explaining discussion induced cooperation’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 54: 811–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Orbell, J. M., Dawes, R. M. and Kragt, A. J. C. (1983), ‘The minimal contributing set as a solution to public goods problems’, American Political Science Review 77: 112–22.Google Scholar

Ostrom, E., and J. M. Walker (1991), ‘Cooperation without external enforcement’, in: Palfrey, T. P. (ed.), Laboratory Research in Political Economy, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press 287–322.Google Scholar

Pantaleoni, M. (1898), Pure Economics, Clifton, NJ: Kelley.Google Scholar

Pareto, V. (1911), Le mythe vertuiste et la littérature immorale, Paris: Rivière.Google Scholar

Pareto, V. (1913), ‘Il massimo di utilità per una colletività’, Giornale degli Economisti 3: 337–41. [Reprinted as a long footnote in A Treatise on General Sociology.]Google Scholar

Pareto, V. (1916), A Treatise on General Sociology, New York: Dover.Google Scholar

Parsons, T. (1951), The Social System, Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar

Piaget, J. (1932), La Naissance du Sentiment Moral chez l'Enfant, Geneva: Payot.Google Scholar

Polanyi, K. (1944), The Great Transformation: The Political Origin of Our Time, Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar

Prasnikar, V., and Roth, A. E. (1992), ‘Considerations of fairness and strategy: experimental data from sequential games’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 107 (3): 865–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Proudhon, P. J. (1853), Manuel du spéculateur à la bourse, Paris: Garnier Frères.Google Scholar

Pruitt, D. G. (1968), ‘Reciprocity and credit building in a laboratory dyad’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 8: 143–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pryor, F. (1977), The Origins of the Economy, New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Putnam, R. O. (1993), Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Rabin, M. (1993), ‘Incorporating fairness into game theory and economics’, American Economic Review 83 (5): 1281–302.Google Scholar

Rabin, M. (1998), ‘Psychology and economics’, Journal of Economic Literature 36: 11–46.Google Scholar

Radner, R. (1980), ‘Collusive behavior in noncooperative epsilon-equilibria of oligopolies with long but finite lives’, Journal of Economic Theory 22 (2): 136–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rose-Ackerman, S. (1996), ‘Altruism, nonprofits, and economic theory’, Journal of Economic Literature 34: 701–28.Google Scholar

Rosenhan, D. L. (1969), ‘Some origins of concern for others’, in: Mussen, P., J. Langer and M. Covington (eds.), Trends and Issues in Developmental Psychology, New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 134–53.Google Scholar

Rosenhan, D. L. (1970), ‘The natural socialization of altruistic autonomy’, in: Macaulay, J. and Berkowitz, L. (eds.), Altruism and Helping Behavior, New York: Academic Press, 251–68.Google Scholar

Rosenhan, D. L., and White, G. M. (1967), ‘Observation and rehearsal as determinants of prosocial behavior’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 5: 424–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rotemberg, J. (1994), ‘Human relations in the workplace’, Journal of Political Economy 102 (4): 684–717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roth, A. E. (1995), ‘Bargaining experiments’, in: Kagel, J. H. and Roth, A. E. (eds.), Handbook of Experimental Economics, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 253–348.Google Scholar

Sacco, P. L., and S. Zamagni (1996), ‘An evolutionary dynamic approach to altruism’, in: Farina, F., Hahn, F., and Vannucci, S. (eds.), Ethics, Rationality, and Economic Behaviour, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 265–300.Google Scholar

Sacco, P. L., and Zamagni, S. (eds.) (2002), Complessità Relazionale e Comportamento Economico, Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar

Sahlins, M. (1968), Tribesmen, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Sahlins, M. (1977), The Use and Abuse of Biology.An Anthropological Critique of Sociobiology. London: Tavistock.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sawyer, J. (1966), ‘The altruism scale: a measure of cooperative, individualistic, and competitive interpersonal orientation’, American Journal of Sociology 71: 407–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schneider, F., and Pommerehne, W. (1981), ‘On the rationality of free-riding: an experiment’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 96: 689–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schwartz, B. (1967), ‘The social psychology of the gift’, American Journal of Sociology 73: 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schwartz, R. (1970), ‘Personal philanthropic contributions’, Journal of Political Economy 78 (6): 1264–91.Google Scholar

Scott, R. H. (1972), ‘Avarice, altruism, and second party preferences’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 86 (1): 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Segal, U., and Sobel, J. (1999), Tit for Tat: Foundations of Preferences for Reciprocity in Strategic Settings, Discussion Paper 99–10, University of California, San Diego.Google Scholar

Selten, R., and Ockenfels, A. (1998), ‘An experimental solidarity game’, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 34 (4): 517–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Service, E. R. (1966), The Hunters, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Sethi, R., and Somanathan, E. (2001), ‘Preference evolution and reciprocity’, Journal of Economic Theory 97: 273–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sethi, R., and Somanathan, E. (2003), ‘Understanding reciprocity’, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 50 (1): 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Silber, J. (ed.) (1999), Handbook on Income Inequality Measurement, Boston: Kluwer Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simon, H. A. (1990), ‘A mechanism for social selection and successful altruism’, Science 250: 1665–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simon, H. A. (1991), ‘Organization and markets’, Journal of Economic Perspectives 5: 27–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smale, S. (1980), ‘The prisoner's dilemma and dynamic systems associated to non-cooperative games’, Econometrica 48: 1617–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, A. (1759 [1966]), The Theory of Moral Sentiments, New York: Kelly.Google Scholar

Smith, A. (1776 [1937]), An Inquiry into the Nature and Cause of the Wealth of Nations, New York: Random House.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sobel, J. (2005), ‘Interdependent preferences and reciprocity’, Journal of Economic Literature 43: 392–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Solow, J. L. (1993), ‘Is it really the thought that counts? Toward a rational theory of Christmas’, Rationality and Society 5: 506–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Solow, R. M. (1979), ‘Another possible source of wage stickiness’, Journal of Macroeconomics 1 (1): 79–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stark, O. (1995), Altruism and Beyond: An Economic Analysis of Transfers and Exchanges within Families and Groups, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stark, W. (ed.) (1952–4), Jeremy Bentham's Economic Writings (3 vols.), New York: Franklin.Google Scholar

Stein, E. (1964), On the Problem of Empathy (trans. W. Stein), The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar

Stotland, E. (1969), ‘Exploratory investigations of empathy’, in: Berkowitz, L. (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, New York: Academic Press, 271–314.Google Scholar

Sugden, R. (1984), ‘Reciprocity: the supply of public goods through voluntary contribution’, Economic Journal 94: 772–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sugden, R. (1993), ‘Thinking as a team: towards an explanation of nonselfish behavior’, Social Philosophy and Policy 10: 69–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sugden, R. (2000), ‘Team preferences’, Economics and Philosophy 16: 175–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sugden, R. (2002), ‘Beyond sympathy and empathy: Adam Smith's concept of fellow feeling’, Economics and Philosophy 18: 63–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Swaney, J. A. (1990), ‘Common property, reciprocity, and community’, Journal of Economic Issues24: 451–62.Google Scholar

Thurnwald, R. G. (1916), ‘Bánaro society: social organization and kinship system of a tribe in the interior of New Guinea’, Memoirs of the American Anthropological Association 3 (4): 251–391.Google Scholar

Thurnwald, R. G. (1921), Die Gemeinde der Bánaro, Stuttgart: Ferdinand Enke.Google Scholar

Thurnwald, R. G. (1932a), Die Menschliche Gesellschaft, 5 vols., Berlin and Leipzig: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Thurnwald, R. G. (1932b), Economics in Primitive Communities, London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Titmuss, R. M. (1971), The Gift Relationship, London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar

Tognoli, J. (1975), ‘Reciprocation of generosity and knowledge of game termination in the decomposed prisoner's dilemma game’, European Journal of Social Psychology 5: 297–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tönnies, F. (1972), Gemeinschaft und Gesellschaft, Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar

Tournier, P. (1963), The Meaning of Gifts, Richmond, VA: John Knox Press.Google Scholar

Trivers, R. L. (1971), ‘The evolution of reciprocal altruism’, Quarterly Review of Biology 46 (1): 35–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Uhlaner, C. J. (1989), ‘Relational goods and participation: incorporating sociability into a theory of rational action’, Public Choice 62: 253–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kragt, A. J. C., Orbell, J. M. and Dawes, R. M. (1983), ‘The minimal contributing set as a solution to public goods problems’, American Political Science Review 77: 112–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vickrey, W. S. (1962), ‘One economist's view of philanthropy’, in: Dickinson, F. (ed.), Philanthropy and Public Policy, New York: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar

Furstenberg, G. M., and Mueller, D. C. (1971), ‘The Pareto optimal approach to income redistribution: a fiscal application’, American Economic Review 61 (3): 628–37.Google Scholar

Waller, W., and Hill, R. (1951), The Family: A Dynamic Interpretation, New York: Dryden Press.Google Scholar

Walras, L. (1865 [1969]), Les associations populaires de consommation, de production et de crédit, Rome: Bizzarri.Google Scholar

Warr, P. G. (1982), ‘Pareto optimal redistribution and private charity’, Journal of Public Economics 19: 131–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weisbrod, B. A. (1988), The Nonprofit Economy, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Westermarck, E. (1908), The Origin and Development of the Moral Ideas, vol. II, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Wicksteed, P. H. (1888), The Alphabet of Economic Science, London: R. H. Hutton.Google Scholar

Wicksteed, P. H. (1933), The Common Sense of Political Economy, London: Robbins Edn.Google Scholar

Wilke, H., and Lanzetta, J. (1970), ‘The obligation to help: the effects of prior help on subsequent helping behavior’, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 6: 466–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Winter, S. J. (1969), ‘A simple remark on the second optimality theorem of welfare economics’, Journal of Economic Theory 1: 99–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wintrobe, R. (1981), ‘It pays to do good, but not to do more good than it pays’, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 2: 201–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wispe, L. (1968), ‘Sympathy and empathy’, in: Sills, D. L. (ed.), Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, vol. XV, New York: Macmillan, 441–7.Google Scholar

Wolff, K. H. (ed.) (1950), The Sociology of Georg Simmel, trans. Wolff, K. H., Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar

Wright, B. (1942), ‘Altruism in children and the perceived conduct of others’, Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 37: 218–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zak, P. J., and Knack, S. (2001), ‘Trust and growth’, Economic Journal 111: 295–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zamagni, S. (ed.) (1995), The Economics of Altruism, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Zeckhauser, R. (1971), ‘Optimal mechanisms for income transfer’, American Economic Review 61 (3): 324–34.Google Scholar