Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-k7p5g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T02:26:22.472Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - Reconfigurable Devices and Smart Antennas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2022

Philippe Ferrari
Affiliation:
Université de Grenoble
Rolf Jakoby
Affiliation:
Technische Universität, Darmstadt, Germany
Onur Hamza Karabey
Affiliation:
ALCAN Systems GmbH, Germany
Gustavo P. Rehder
Affiliation:
Escola Politécnica da Universidade de São Paulo
Holger Maune
Affiliation:
Technische Universität, Darmstadt, Germany
Get access

Summary

This chapter provides basic knowledge on technologies and circuits for future communication systems. Based on upcoming mm-wave communications, system requirements are derived. E.g. link analysis is used to visualize the need for high-gain antenna systems, which are further investigated in different scenarios such as stationary and mobile use cases. The chapter further gives an overview on different tunable circuits and devices such as phase shifters for antennas systems or tunable filters. The chapter feastures an overview of different technologies available to implement the required fuinctionality. The individual technologies will be described in full detail in later chapters

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

International Telecommunication Union (ITU), “Attenuation by atmospheric gases,” standard ITU-R P.676-11, 2016.Google Scholar
Rappaport, T. S., Heath, R. W., Daniels, R. C., and Murdock, J. N., Millimeter Wave Wireless Communications. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 2014.Google Scholar
Dawn, D., Sen, P., Sarkar, S., Perumana, B., Pinel, S., and Laskar, J., “60-GHz Integrated transmitter development in 90-nm CMOS,” IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 57, pp. 23542367, 2009.Google Scholar
Zhao, D., Kulkarni, S., and Reynaert, P., “A 60-GHz outphasing transmitter in 40-nm CMOS,” IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 47, pp. 31723183, 2012.Google Scholar
Okada, K., Minami, R., Tsukui, Y., Kawai, S., Seo, Y., Sato, S., et al., “20.3 A 64-QAM 60GHz CMOS transceiver with 4-channel bonding,” in 2014 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference Digest of Technical Papers (ISSCC), 2014, pp. 346–347.Google Scholar
LaRocca, T., Wu, Y., Thai, K., Snyder, R., Daftari, N., Fordham, O., et al., “A 64QAM 94GHz CMOS transmitter SoC with digitally-assisted power amplifiers and thru-silicon waveguide power combiners,” in 2014 IEEE Radio Frequency Integrated Circuits Symposium, 2014, pp. 295–298.Google Scholar
Wu, P., Liu, Y., Hanafi, B., Dabag, H., Asbeck, P., and Buckwalter, J., “A 45-GHz Si/SiGe 256-QAM transmitter with digital predistortion,” in 2015 IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium, 2015, pp. 1–3.Google Scholar
Zhao, D. and Reynaert, P., “A 40 nm CMOS E-band transmitter with compact and symmetrical layout floor-plans,” IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 50, pp. 25602571, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khalaf, K., Vidojkovic, V., Vaesen, K., Libois, M., Mangraviti, G., Szortyka, V., et al., “Digitally modulated CMOS polar transmitters for highly-efficient mm-wave wireless communication,” IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 51, pp. 15791592, 2016.Google Scholar
Kodak, U. and Rebeiz, G. M., “A 5G 28-GHz common-leg T/R front-end in 45-nm CMOS SOI with 3.7-dB NF and −30-dBc EVM with 64-QAM/500-MBaud modulation,” IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 67, pp. 318331, 2019.Google Scholar
Tai, W., Carley, L. R., and Ricketts, D. S., “A 0.7W fully integrated 42GHz power amplifier with 10% PAE in 0.13µm SiGe BiCMOS,” in 2013 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference Digest of Technical Papers, 2013, pp. 142–143.Google Scholar
Agah, A., Jayamon, J. A., Asbeck, P. M., Larson, L. E., and Buckwalter, J. F., “Multi-drive stacked-FET power amplifiers at 90 GHz in 45 nm SOI CMOS,” IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 49, pp. 11481157, 2014.Google Scholar
Zhao, D. and Reynaert, P., “A 40-nm CMOS E-band 4-way power amplifier with neutralized bootstrapped cascode amplifier and optimum passive circuits,” IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 63, pp. 40834089, 2015.Google Scholar
Babaie, M., Staszewski, R. B., Galatro, L., and Spirito, M., “A wideband 60 GHz class-E/F2 power amplifier in 40nm CMOS,” in 2015 IEEE Radio Frequency Integrated Circuits Symposium (RFIC), 2015, pp. 215–218.Google Scholar
Shakib, S., Park, H., Dunworth, J., Aparin, V., and Entesari, K., “20.6 A 28GHz efficient linear power amplifier for 5G phased arrays in 28nm bulk CMOS,” in 2016 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference (ISSCC), 2016, pp. 352–353.Google Scholar
Welp, B., Noujeim, K., and Pohl, N., “A wideband 20 to 28 GHz signal generator MMIC with 30.8 dBm output power based on a power amplifier cell with 31% PAE in SiGe,” IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 51, pp. 19751984, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helmi, S. R., Chen, J., and Mohammadi, S., “High-efficiency microwave and mm-wave stacked cell CMOS SOI power amplifiers,” IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 64, pp. 20252038, 2016.Google Scholar
Jayamon, J. A., Buckwalter, J. F., and Asbeck, P. M., “A PMOS mm-wave power amplifier at 77 GHz with 90 mW output power and 24% efficiency,” in 2016 IEEE Radio Frequency Integrated Circuits Symposium (RFIC), 2016, pp. 262–265.Google Scholar
Datta, K. and Hashemi, H., “75–105 GHz switching power amplifiers using high-breakdown, high-fmaxmulti-port stacked transistor topologies,” in 2016 IEEE Radio Frequency Integrated Circuits Symposium (RFIC), 2016, pp. 306–309.Google Scholar
Mortazavi, S. Y. and Koh, K., “A 43% PAE inverse Class-F power amplifier at 39–42 GHz with a λ/4-transformer based harmonic filter in 0.13-µm SiGe BiCMOS,” in 2016 IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium (IMS), 2016, pp. 1–4.Google Scholar
International Telecommunication Union (ITU), “Specific attenuation model for rain for use in prediction methods,” standard ITU-R P.838-3, 2005.Google Scholar
International Telecommunication Union (ITU), “Attenuation due to clouds and fog,” standard ITU-R P.840-7, 2017.Google Scholar
International Telecommunication Union (ITU), “Characteristics of precipitation for propagation modelling,” standard ITU-R P.837-6, 2012.Google Scholar
Chu, L. J., “Physical limitations of omni‐directional antennas,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 19, pp. 11631175, 1948.Google Scholar
Balanis, C. A., Antenna Theory Analysis and Design, 4th ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2016.Google Scholar
Joseffsson, L. and Persson, P., Conformal Array Antenna Theory and Design. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Allard, R. J., Werner, D. H., and Werner, P. L., “Radiation pattern synthesis for arrays of conformal antennas mounted on arbitrarily-shaped three-dimensional platforms using genetic algorithms,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 51, pp. 10541062, 2003.Google Scholar
Lei, J., Yang, J., Chen, X., Zhang, Z., Fu, G., and Hao, Y., “Experimental demonstration of conformal phased array antenna via transformation optics,” Scientific Reports, vol. 8, p. 3807, 2018/02/28 2018.Google Scholar
Applebaum, S., “Adaptive arrays,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 24, pp. 585598, 1976.Google Scholar
Widrow, B. and McCool, J., “A comparison of adaptive algorithms based on the methods of steepest descent and random search,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 24, pp. 615637, 1976.Google Scholar
Murmann, B... ADC Performance Survey. Available at: http://web.stanford.edu/~murmann/adcsurvey.htmlGoogle Scholar
Oppermann, M. and Rieger, R., “Multifunctional MMICs – key enabler for future AESA panel arrays,” in 2018 IMAPS Nordic Conference on Microelectronics Packaging (NordPac), 2018, pp. 7780.Google Scholar
Drackner, P. N. and Engstrom, B., “An active antenna demonstrator for future AESA-systems,” in IEEE International Radar Conference, 2005, 2005, pp. 226–231.Google Scholar
Chaloun, T., Menzel, W., Tabarani, F., Purtova, T., Schumacher, H., Kaynak, M., et al., “Wide-angle scanning active transmit/receive reflectarray,” IET Microwaves, Antennas & Propagation, vol. 8, pp. 811818, 2014.Google Scholar
Sievenpiper, D. F., Schaffner, J. H., Song, H. J., Loo, R. Y., and Tangonan, G., “Two-dimensional beam steering using an electrically tunable impedance surface,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 51, pp. 27132722, 2003.Google Scholar
Huang, J. and Encinar, J. A., Reflectarray Antennas. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Bildik, S., Dieter, S., Fritzsch, C., Frei, M., Fischer, C., Menzel, W., et al., “Reconfigurable liquid crystal reflectarray with extended tunable phase range,” in 2011 8th European Radar Conference, 2011, pp. 404–407.Google Scholar
Bildik, S., Dieter, S., Fritzsch, C., Menzel, W., and Jakoby, R., “Reconfigurable folded reflectarray antenna based upon liquid crystal technology,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 63, pp. 122132, 2015.Google Scholar
Hum, S. V. and Perruisseau-Carrier, J., “Reconfigurable reflectarrays and array lenses for dynamic antenna beam control: A review,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 62, pp. 183198, 2014.Google Scholar
Lee, J. J., “G/T and noise figure of active array antennas,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 41, pp. 241244, 1993.Google Scholar
Pozar, D. M., Microwave Engineering, 4th ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2011.Google Scholar
Nickel, M., Karabey, O. H., Maasch, M., Reese, R., Jost, M., Damm, C., et al., “Analysis of hybrid-passive-active phased array configurations based on an SNR approximation,” in European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EUCAP), 2017, pp. 852–856.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), “Guide for the use of the International System of Units (SI),” vol. NIST Special Publication 811, ed, 2008.Google Scholar
Schüßler, H. W. and Steffen, P., “Halfband filters and Hilbert transformers,” Circuits, Systems and Signal Processing, vol. 17, pp. 137164, 1998/03/01 1998.Google Scholar
Fox, A. G., “An adjustable wave-guide phase changer,” Proceedings of the IRE, vol. 35, pp. 14891498, 1947.Google Scholar
Hansen, R. C., Microwave Scanning Antennas. Westport, CT: Peninsula Publications, 1986.Google Scholar
Stark, L., “A helical line scanner for beam steering a linear array,” IRE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 5, pp. 211216, 1957.Google Scholar
Reggia, F. and Spencer, E. G., “A new technique in ferrite phase shifting for beam scanning of microwave antennas,” Proceedings of the IRE, vol. 45, pp. 15101517, 1957.Google Scholar
White, J. F., “High power, p-i-n diode controlled, microwave transmission phase shifters,” IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 13, pp. 233242, 1965.Google Scholar
White, J. F., “Review of semiconductor microwave phase shifters,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 56, pp. 19241931, 1968.Google Scholar
Matthaei, G. L., Young, L., and Jones, E. M. T., Microwave Filters, Impedance-Matching Networks, and Coupling Structures. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1964; Repr. 1980.Google Scholar
Uher, J., Bornemann, J., and Rosenberg, U., Waveguide Components for Antenna Feed Systems Theory and CAD. Norwood, MA: Artech House, 1993.Google Scholar
Cameron, R. J., “Advanced filter synthesis,” IEEE Microwave Magazine, vol. 12, pp. 4261, 2011.Google Scholar
Cameron, R. J., “Advanced coupling matrix synthesis techniques for microwave filters,” IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 51, pp. 110, 2003.Google Scholar
Serrano, A. L. C., Correra, F. S., Vuong, T., and Ferrari, P., “Synthesis methodology applied to a tunable patch filter with independent frequency and bandwidth control,” IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 60, pp. 484493, 2012.Google Scholar
Mansour, R. R., “High-Q tunable dielectric resonator filters,” IEEE Microwave Magazine, vol. 10, pp. 8498, 2009.Google Scholar
Arnod, C., Parlebas, J., and Zwick, T., “Center frequency and bandwidth tunable waveguide bandpass filter with transmission zeros,” in 2015 10th European Microwave Integrated Circuits Conference (EuMIC), 2015, pp. 369–372.Google Scholar
Yassini, B., Yu, M., and Keats, B., “A Ka-band fully tunable cavity filter,” IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 60, pp. 40024012, 2012.Google Scholar
Brank, J., Yao, J., Eberly, M., Malczewski, A., Varian, K., and Goldsmith, C., “RF MEMS-based tunable filters,” International Journal of RF and Microwave Computer-Aided Engineering, vol. 11, pp. 276284, 2001.Google Scholar
Entesari, K. and Rebeiz, G. M., “A 12-18-GHz three-pole RF MEMS tunable filter,” IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 53, pp. 25662571, 2005.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, U., Beyer, R., Krauß, P., Sieverding, T., Papanastasiou, A., Pueyo-Tolosa, M., et al., “Novel remote controlled dual mode filter providing flexible re-allocation of center frequency and bandwidth,” in 2016 IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium (IMS), 2016, pp. 1–3.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, U., Beyer, R., Krauß, P., Sieverding, T., Iglesias, P. M., and Ernst, C., “Remote controlled high-Q cavity filters providing center frequency and bandwidth re-allocation,” in 2017 IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Workshop Series on Advanced Materials and Processes for RF and THz Applications (IMWS-AMP), 2017, pp. 1–3.Google Scholar
Synder, R. V., “Generalized cross-coupled filters using evanescent mode coupling elements,” in 1997 IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium Digest, vol. 2, pp. 10951098, 1997.Google Scholar
Amari, S. and Macchiarella, G., “Synthesis of inline filters with arbitrarily placed attenuation poles by using nonresonating nodes,” IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 53, pp. 30753081, 2005.Google Scholar
Schuster, C., Wiens, A., Schmidt, F., Nickel, M., Schüßler, M., Jakoby, R., et al., “Performance analysis of reconfigurable bandpass filters with continuously tunable center frequency and bandwidth,” IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 65, pp. 45724583, 2017.Google Scholar
Chen, K., Liu, X., and Peroulis, D., “Widely tunable high-efficiency power amplifier with ultra-narrow instantaneous bandwidth,” IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 60, pp. 37873797, 2012.Google Scholar
Fu, J. and Mortazawi, A., “Improving power amplifier efficiency and linearity using a dynamically controlled tunable matching network,” IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 56, pp. 32393244, 2008.Google Scholar
Haitao, Z., Huai, G., and Guann-Pyng, L., “Broad-band power amplifier with a novel tunable output matching network,” IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 53, pp. 36063614, 2005.Google Scholar
Nemati, H. M., Fager, C., Gustavsson, U., Jos, R., and Zirath, H., “Design of varactor-based tunable matching networks for dynamic load modulation of high power amplifiers,” IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 57, pp. 11101118, 2009.Google Scholar
Sánchez-Pérez, C., Özen, M., Andersson, C. M., Kuylenstierna, D., Rorsman, N., and Fager, C., “Optimized design of a dual-band power amplifier with SiC varactor-based dynamic load modulation,” IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 63, pp. 25792588, 2015.Google Scholar
Tombak, A., “A ferroelectric-capacitor-based tunable matching network for quad-band cellular power amplifiers,” IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 55, pp. 370375, 2007.Google Scholar
Yoon, Y., Kim, H., Park, Y., Ahn, M., Lee, C., and Laskar, J., “A high-power and highly linear CMOS switched capacitor,” IEEE Microwave and Wireless Components Letters, vol. 20, pp. 619621, 2010.Google Scholar
Preis, S., Wiens, A., Maune, H., Heinrich, W., Jakoby, R., and Bengtsson, O., “Reconfigurable package integrated 20 W RF power GaN HEMT with discrete thick-film MIM BST varactors,” Electronics Letters, vol. 52, pp. 296298, 2016.Google Scholar
Preis, S., Wolff, N., Lenze, F., Wiens, A., Jakoby, R., Heinrich, W., et al., “Load tuning assisted discrete-level supply modulation using BST and GaN devices for highly efficient power amplifiers,” in 2018 IEEE/MTT-S International Microwave Symposium - IMS, 2018, pp. 1230–1233.Google Scholar
Chen, Y., Martens, R., Valkonen, R., and Manteuffel, D., “Evaluation of adaptive impedance tuning for reducing the form factor of handset antennas,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 63, pp. 703710, 2015.Google Scholar
Dong-Hyuk, C. and Seong-Ook, P., “A varactor-tuned active-integrated antenna using slot antenna,” IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, vol. 4, pp. 191193, 2005.Google Scholar
Park, J., Tak, Y., Kim, Y., Kim, Y., and Nam, S., “Investigation of adaptive matching methods for near-field wireless power transfer,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 59, pp. 17691773, 2011.Google Scholar
Smith, N. J., Chen, C., and Volakis, J. L., “An improved topology for adaptive agile impedance tuners,” IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, vol. 12, pp. 9295, 2013.Google Scholar
Vasilev, I., Plicanic, V., and Lau, B. K., “Impact of antenna design on MIMO performance for compact terminals with adaptive impedance matching,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 64, pp. 14541465, 2016.Google Scholar
Wang, B., Gao, H., Dommele, R. v., Matters-Kammerer, M. K., and Baltus, P. G. M., “A 60 GHz low noise variable gain amplifier with small noise figure and IIP3 variation in a 40-nm CMOS technology,” in 2018 IEEE MTT-S International Wireless Symposium (IWS), 2018, pp. 1–4.Google Scholar
Siao, D., Kao, J., and Wang, H., “A 60 GHz low phase variation variable gain amplifier in 65 nm CMOS,” IEEE Microwave and Wireless Components Letters, vol. 24, pp. 457459, 2014.Google Scholar
Avago Technologies, “A low-cost surface mount PIN diode π attenuator,” Application Note 1048, 2010.Google Scholar
Prasetiadi, A. E., Jost, M., Schulz, B., Quibeldey, M., Rabe, T., Follmann, R., et al., “Liquid-crystal-based amplitude tuner fabricated in LTCC technology,” in 2017 47th European Microwave Conference (EuMC), 2017, pp. 1085–1088.Google Scholar
Wang, M., Trlica, C., Khan, M. R., Dickey, M. D., and Adams, J. J., “A reconfigurable liquid metal antenna driven by electrochemically controlled capillarity,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 117, p. 194901, 2015.Google Scholar
Cumby, B. L., Mast, D. B., Tabor, C. E., Dickey, M. D., and Heikenfeld, J., “Robust pressure-actuated liquid metal devices showing reconfigurable electromagnetic effects at GHz frequencies,” IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 63, pp. 31223130, 2015.Google Scholar
Gough, R. C., Morishita, A. M., Dang, J. H., Hu, W., Shiroma, W. A., and Ohta, A. T., “Continuous electrowetting of non-toxic liquid metal for RF applications,” IEEE Access, vol. 2, pp. 874882, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gevorgian, S., Ferroelectrics in Microwave Devices, Circuits and Systems Physics, Modeling, Fabrication and Measurements. London: Springer, 2009..Google Scholar
Jiang, H., Lacroix, B., Choi, K., Wang, Y., Hunt, A. T., and Papapolymerou, J., “Ka- and Ku-Band tunable bandpass filters using ferroelectric capacitors,” IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 59, pp. 30683075, 2011.Google Scholar
Velu, G., Blary, K., Burgnies, L., Marteau, A., Houzet, G., Lippens, D., et al., “A 360°BST phase shifter with moderate bias voltage at 30 GHz,” IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 55, pp. 438444, 2007.Google Scholar
Zhao, Z., Wang, X., Choi, K., Lugo, C., and Hunt, A. T., “Ferroelectric phase shifters at 20 and 30 GHz,” IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 55, pp. 430437, 2007.Google Scholar
Gevorgian, S., “Agile microwave devices,” IEEE Microwave Magazine, vol. 10, pp. 9398, 2009.Google Scholar
Kuylenstierna, D., Vorobiev, A., and Gevorgian, S., “40 GHz lumped element tunable bandpass filters with transmission zeros based on thin Ba0.25Sr0.75TiO3 (BST) film varactors,” in Digest of Papers. 2006 Topical Meeting on Silicon Monolithic Integrated Circuits in RF Systems, 2006, pp. 342–345.Google Scholar
Paolis, R. D., Coccetti, F., Payan, S., Maglione, M., and Guegan, G., “Characterization of ferroelectric BST MIM capacitors up to 65 GHz for a compact phase shifter at 60 GHz,” in 2014 44th European Microwave Conference, 2014, pp. 492–495.Google Scholar
Bea, H., Bibes, M., Herranz, G., Zhu, X., Fusil, S., Bouzehouane, K., et al., “Integration of multiferroic BiFeO3 thin films into heterostructures for spintronics,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 44, pp. 19411945, 2008.Google Scholar
Makarova, L. A., Rodionova, V. V., Alekhina, Y. A., Rusakova, T. S., Omelyanchik, A. S., and Perov, N. S., “New multiferroic composite materials consisting of ferromagnetic, ferroelectric, and polymer components,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 53, pp. 17, 2017.Google Scholar
Malkinski, L., McGehee, M., Gould, T., Eskandari, R., and Chalastaras, A., “Phase control of magnetic susceptibility of multiferroic composites,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 51, pp. 13, 2015.Google Scholar
Vopsaroiu, M., Stewart, M., Fry, T., Cain, M., and Srinivasan, G., “Tuning the magneto-electric effect of multiferroic composites via crystallographic texture,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 44, pp. 30173020, 2008.Google Scholar
Yang, X., Gao, Y., Wu, J., Beguhn, S., Nan, T., Zhou, Z., et al., “Dual H- and E-field tunable multiferroic bandpass filter at Ku-band using partially magnetized spinel ferrites,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 49, pp. 54855488, 2013.Google Scholar
n. i. Gutiérrez, I., Meléndez, J., and Hernández, E.. “Design and characterization of integrated varactors for RF applications.” Available at: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/9780470035924Google Scholar
Maune, H., Jost, M., Reese, R., Polat, E., Nickel, M., and Jakoby, R., “Microwave liquid crystal technology,” Crystals, vol. 8, 2018.Google Scholar
Zografopoulos, D. C., Ferraro, A., and Beccherelli, R., “Liquid-crystal high-frequency microwave technology: Materials and characterization,” Advanced Materials Technologies, vol. 0, p. 1800447, 2018/12/13 2018.Google Scholar
Weickhmann, C., Jakoby, R., Constable, E., and Lewis, R. A., “Time-domain spectroscopy of novel nematic liquid crystals in the terahertz range,” in 2013 38th International Conference on Infrared, Millimeter, and Terahertz Waves (IRMMW-THz), 2013, pp. 1–2.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×