Bibliography
Batterman, R., & Rice, C. (2014). Minimal model explanations. Philosophy of Science, 81, 349–376.
Bechtel, W. (2008). Mental Mechanisms. New York: Psychology Press.
Bechtel, W. (2009). Looking down, around, and up: Mechanistic explanation in psychology. Philosophical Psychology, 22, 543–564.
Bechtel, W., & Abrahamsen, A. (2005). Explanation: A mechanistic alternative. Studies in History and Philosophy of the Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 36, 421–441.
Bechtel, W., & Levy, A. (2013). Abstraction and the organization of mechanisms. Philosophy of Science, 80, 241–261.
Brandon, R. (1990). Adaptation and Environment. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Cartwright, N. (1983). How the Laws of Physics Lie. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Chirimuuta, M. (2014). Minimal models and canonical neural computations: The distinctness of computational explanation in neuroscience. Synthese, 191, 127–153.
Craver, C. (2007). Explaining the Brain. New York: Oxford University Press.
Craver, C. (2015). Levels. In Metzinger, T & Windt, J. M., eds., Open Mind. Frankfurt am Main: MIND Group Chapter 8.
Craver, C., & Bechtel, W. (2007). Top-down causation without top-down causes. Biology and Philosophy, 22, 547–563.
Craver, C., & Darden, D. (2013). In Search of Mechanisms. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Craver, C., & Kaplan, D. M. (2011). The explanatory force of dynamical and mathematical models in neuroscience: A mechanistic perspective. Philosophy of Science, 78, 601–627.
Craver, C., & Kaplan, D. (2020). Are more details better? On the norms of completeness for mechanistic explanations. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 71, 287–319.
Crick, F. (1966). Of Molecules and Men. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
Cummins, R. (1975). Functional analysis. Journal of Philosophy, 72, 741–764.
Darden, L. (2006). Reasoning in Biological Discoveries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dawkins, R. (1982). The Extended Phenotype. San Francisco, CA: Freeman.
Dowe, P. (1992). Wesley Salmon’s process theory of causality and the conserved quantity theory. Philosophy of Science, 59, 195–216.
Dray, W. (1957). Law and Explanation in History. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dupres, J. (1993). The Disorder of Things: Metaphysical Foundations of the Disunity of Science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Feyerabend, P. (1964). Reduction, Empiricism and Laws. Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. III. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Fodor, J. (1974). Special sciences (or: the disunity of science as a working hypothesis). Synthese, 28, 97–115.
Fodor, J. (1975). The Language of Thought. New York: Crowell.
Garson, J. (2013). The functional sense of mechanism. Philosophy of Science, 80, 317–333.
Gould, S. J., & Lewontin, R. (1979). The spandrels of St. Marco and the Panglossian paradigm. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B205, 581–598.
Havsted, J. (2011). Problems for natural selection as a mechanism. Philosophy of Science, 78, 512–523.
Hull, D. (1974). The Philosophy of Biological Science. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Hull, D. (1989). Science as a Process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kaplan, D. M. (2011). Explanation and description in computational neuroscience. Synthese, 183, 339–373.
Kellert, S. H., Longino, H., & Waters, C. K. (2006). Scientific Pluralism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Keys, D. N., Lewis, D. L., Selegue, J. E., et al. (1999). Recruitment of a hedgehog regulatory circuit in butterfly eyespot evolution. Science, 283, 532–534.
Kim, J. (2005). Physicalism, or Something Near Enough. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Kitcher, P. (1978). Theories, theorists and theoretical change. Philosophical Review, 84, 519–547.
Kitcher, P. (1984). 1953 and all that: A tale of two sciences. Philosophical Review, 93, 335–373.
Kitcher, P. (1995). The Advancement of Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kitcher, P. (1999). The hegemony of molecular biology. Biology and Philosophy, 14, 195–210.
Kuhn, T. (1961). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lange, M. (1995). Are there natural laws concerning particular species? Journal of Philosophy, 112, 430–451.
Lawrence, P. (1992). The Making of a Fly. Oxford: Blackwell’s.
Levy, A. (2013). What was Hodgkin and Huxley’s achievement? British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 65, 469–492.
Lewontin, R. (1978). Adaptation. Scientific American, 239, 212–228.
Longino, H. (2013). Studying Human Behavior: How Scientists Investigate Aggression and Sexuality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Longino, H. (2014). Pluralism, social action, and the causal space of human behavior. Metascience, 23, 443–459.
Machamer, P., Darden, L., & Craver, C. F. (2000). Thinking about mechanisms. Philosophy of Science, 67, 1–25.
Mayr, E. (1981). The Growth of Biological Thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Mitchell, S. (2000). Dimensions of scientific law. Philosophy of Science, 18, 295–315.
Monod, J. (1971). Chance and Necessity: An Essay on the Natural Philosophy of Modern Biology. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Nagel, E. (1961). The Structure of Science. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.
Neander, K., & Rosenberg, A. (2009). Are homologies (selected effect or causal role) function free? Philosophy of Science, 76, 307–334.
Nickles, T. (1973). Two concepts of intertheoretical reduction. Journal of Philosophy, 70, 181–201.
Nijhout, F. (1994). Genes on the wing. Science, 265, 44–45.
Oppenheim, P., & Putnam, H. (1958). The Unity of Science as a Working Hypothesis. Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. II. Minneapolis: Minnesota University Press.
Perutz, M. (1962). Proteins and Nucleic Acids: Structure and Function. Amsterdam and London: Elsevier.
Piccinini, G., & Craver, C. (2011). Integrating psychology and neuroscience: Functional analysis as mechanism sketches. Synthese, 183, 283–311.
Potochnik, A. (2017). Idealization and the Aims of Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Quine, W. V. O. (1960). Word and Object. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Rosenberg, A. (2012). Why do spatiotemporally restricted regularities explain in the social sciences? British Journal for Philosophy of Science, 63, 1–26.
Salmon, W. (1984). Scientific Explanation and the Causal Structure of the World. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Shaffner, K. (1967). Approaches to reductionism. Philosophy of Science, 34, 137–147.
Simon, H. (1996). The Sciences of the Artificial, 3rd ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Skipper, R. A. Jr., & Millstein, R. L. (2005). Thinking about evolutionary mechanisms: Natural selection. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 36, 327–347.
Sober, E. (1993). Philosophy of Biology. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Sober, E. (1999). The multiple realizability argument against reductionism. Philosophy of Science, 66, 542–564.
Strevens, M. (2008). Depth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Tayberry, J. (2014). Beyond Versus: The Struggle to Understand the Interaction of Nature and Nurture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
van Fraassen, B. (1985). The Scientific Image. New York: Oxford University Press.
Watson, J. B. (1965). Molecular Biology of the Gene. London: Pearson.
Weber, M. (2005). Philosophy of Experimental Biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wilson, E. O. (1999). Consilience: The Unity of Knowledge. New York: Vintage.
Wolpert, L. (1998). Principles of Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Woodward, J. (1997). Explanation, invariance, and intervention. Philosophy of Science, 64(Suppl. Pt. II), S26–S41.
Woodward, J. (2002). What is a mechanism? A counterfactual account. Philosophy of Science, 69, S366–S377.
Woodward, J. (2005). Making Things Happen: A Theory of Causal Explanation. New York: Oxford University Press.
Wright, L. (1976). Teleological Explanation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
