Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-fnpn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-30T02:28:59.212Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 August 2018

Douglas Biber  and
Jesse Egbert
Douglas Biber
Affiliation:
Northern Arizona University
Jesse Egbert
Affiliation:
Northern Arizona University
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Register Variation Online , pp. 243 - 246
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baker, P. 2004. Querying keywords: Questions of difference, frequency, and sense in keywords analysis. Journal of English Linguistics, 32(4), 346–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, P. & Egbert, J. (eds.) 2016. Triangulating Methodological Approaches in Corpus Linguistic Research. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baron, N. S. 2010. Always On: Language in an Online and Mobile World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Baroni, M. & Bernardini, S. 2004. BootCaT: Bootstrapping corpora and terms from the web. In Lino, M. T., Xavier, M. F., Ferreira, F., Costa, R., & Silva, R. (eds.) Proceedings of LREC 2004. 1313–16. Lisbon: ELDA.Google Scholar
Baroni, M., Bernardini, S., Ferraresi, A., & Zanchetta, E. 2009. The WaCky wide web: A collection of very large linguistically processed web-crawled corpora. Language Resources and Evaluation 43(3): 209–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D. 1985. Investigating macroscopic textual variation through multi-feature/multi-dimensional analyses. Linguistics 23: 337–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D. 1986. Spoken and written textual dimensions in English: Resolving the contradictory findings. Language 62: 384–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D. 1988. Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D. 1989. A typology of English texts. Linguistics 27: 3–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D. 1995. Dimensions of Register Variation: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D. 2006. University Language: A Corpus-Based Study of Spoken and Written Registers. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D. 2014. Using multi-dimensional analysis to explore cross-linguistic universals of register variation. Languages in Contrast 14(1): 7–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D. & Conrad, S. 2009. Register, Genre, and Style. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., Conrad, S., Reppen, R., Byrd, P., Helt, M., Clark, V., Cortes, V., Csomay, E., & Urzua, A. 2004. Representing Language Use in the University: Analysis of the TOEFL 2000 Spoken and Written Academic Language Corpus (ETS TOEFL Monograph Series, MS-25). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.Google Scholar
Biber, D. & Egbert, J. 2015. Using grammatical features for automatic register identification in an unrestricted corpus of documents from the open web. Journal of Research Design and Statistics in Linguistics and Communication Science 2(1). 3–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D. & Egbert, J. 2016. Register variation on the searchable web: A multi-dimensional analysis. Journal of English Linguistics 44(2): 95–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., Egbert, J., & Davies, M. 2015. Exploring the composition of the searchable web: A corpus-based taxonomy of web registers. Corpora 10(1): 11–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D. & Gray, B. 2016. Grammatical Complexity in Academic English: Linguistic Change in Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.Google Scholar
Brown, P., & Fraser, C. 1979. Speech as a marker of situation. In Scherer, K.R. & Giles, H. (eds.), Social Markers in Speech (pp. 33–62). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, J. 1977. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Conrad, S. 1996. Academic Discourse in Two Disciplines: Professional Writing and Student Development in Biology and History. Doctoral dissertation, Flagstaff, AZ: Northern Arizona University.Google Scholar
Conrad, S. & Biber, D. (eds.). 2001. Variation in English: Multi-Dimensional Studies. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Crowston, K., Kwasnik, B., & Rubleske, J. 2010. Problems in the use-centered development of a taxonomy of web genres. In Mehler, A., Sharoff, S., & Santini, M. (eds.), Genres on the Web: Computational Models and Empirical Studies. 69–86. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crystal, D. 2001. Language and the Internet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egbert, J. 2015. Sub-register and discipline variation in published academic writing: Investigating statistical interaction in corpus data. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 20(1): 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egbert, J. & Biber, D. 2016. Do all roads lead to Rome?: Modeling register variation with factor analysis and discriminant analysis. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory.Google Scholar
Egbert, J. & Biber, D. (in press). Incorporating text dispersion into keyword analyses. Corpora.Google Scholar
Egbert, J., Biber, D., & Davies, M. 2015. Developing a bottom-up, user-based method of web register classification. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 66(9): 1817–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ervin-Tripp, S. 1972. On sociolinguistic rules: Alternation and co-occurrence. In Gumperz, J. and Hymes, D. (eds.), Directions in Sociolinguistics. 213–50. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar
Ferguson, C. A. 1983. Sports announcer talk: Syntactic aspects of register variation. Language in Society 12(2): 153–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fletcher, W. H. 2012. Corpus analysis of the world wide web. In Chapelle, C. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. 1339–47. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Gray, B. 2015. Linguistic Variation in Research Articles: When Discipline Tells Only Part of the Story (Studies in Corpus Linguistics, Vol. 71). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grieve, J., Biber, D., Friginal, E., & Nekrasova, T. 2010. Variation among blog text types: A multi-dimensional analysis. In Mehler, A., Sharoff, S., & Santini, M. (eds.), Genres on the Web: Corpus Studies and Computational Models. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Guadagno, R. E., Okdie, B. M., & Eno, C. A. 2008. Who blogs? Personality predictors of blogging. Computers in Human Behavior 24(5): 1993–2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. 1988. On the language of physical science. In Ghadessy, M. (ed.), Registers of Written English: Situational Factors and Linguistic Features. London: Pinter: 162–78.Google Scholar
Herring, S. C., Scheidt, L. A., Wright, E., & Bonus, S. 2005. Weblogs as bridging genre. Information Technology & People 18: 142–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herring, S. C. & Paolillo, J. C. 2006. Gender and genre variation in weblogs. Journal of Sociolinguistics 10: 439–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hymes, D. 1974. Foundations in Sociolinguistics. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Kilgarriff, A. & Grefenstette, G. 2003. Introduction to the special issue on the web as corpus. Computational Linguistics 29: 333–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landis, J. & Koch, G. 1977. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33: 159–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paolacci, G., Chandler, J., & Ipeirotis, P. G. 2010. Running experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk. Judgment and Decision Making, 5: 411–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rehm, G., Santini, M., Mehler, A., Braslavski, P., Gleim, R., Stubbe, A., Symonenko, S., Tavosanis, M., & Vidulin, V. 2008. Towards a reference corpus of web genres for the evaluation of genre identification systems. In Calzolari, N., Choukri, K., Maegaard, B., Mariani, J., Odijk, J., Piperidis, S., Rosner, M., & Tapias, D. (eds.), Proceedings of the 6th Language Resources and Evaluation Conference. 351–58. Marrakech.Google Scholar
Rosso, M. A. 2008. User-based identification of web genres. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 59(7): 1053–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosso, M. A. & Haas, S. W. 2010. Identification of web genres by user warrant. In Mehler, A., Sharoff, S., & Santini, M. (eds.), Genres on the Web: Computational Models and Empirical Studies. 47–68. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santini, M. 2007. Characterizing genres of web pages: genre hybridism and individualization. In Sprague, R. H. (ed.), Proceedings of the 40th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-40). 1–10. Hawaii.Google Scholar
Santini, M. 2008. Zero, single, or multi? Genre of web pages through the users' perspective. Information Processing and Management 44: 702–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santini, M. & Sharoff, S. 2009. Web genre benchmark under construction. Journal for Language Technology and Computational Linguistics 25(1): 125–41.Google Scholar
Scott, M. 1997. PC analysis of key words – and key key words. System, 25(2): 233–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharoff, S. 2005. Creating general-purpose corpora using automated search engine queries. In Baroni, M. & Bernardini, S. (eds.), WaCky! Working Papers on the Web as Corpus. 63–98. Bologna: GEDIT.Google Scholar
Sharoff, S. 2006. Open-source corpora: Using the net to fish for linguistic data. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 11(4): 435–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharoff, S. 2018. Functional text dimensions for annotation of web corpora. Corpora 31(2).Google Scholar
Sharoff, S., Wu, Z., & Markert, K. 2010. The Web library of Babel: evaluating genre collections. In Calzolari, N., Choukri, K., Maegaard, B., Mariani, J., Odijk, J., Piperidis, S., Rosner, M., & Tapias, D. (eds.), Proceedings of the Seventh Language Resources and Evaluation Conference. 3063–70. Malta: LREC 2010.Google Scholar
Sindoni, M. G. 2013. Spoken and Written Discourse in Online Interactions. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Staples, S. & Biber, D. 2015. Cluster analysis. In Plonsky, L. (ed.), Advancing Quantitative Methods in Second Language Research. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Suri, S. & Watts, D. J. 2011. Cooperation and contagion in web-based, networked public goods experiments. PLoS One, 6(3): e16836.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Titak, A. & Roberson, A. 2013. Dimensions of web registers: An exploratory multi-dimensional comparison. Corpora 8(2): 239–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vásquez, C. 2012. Narrativity and involvement in online consumer reviews: The case of TripAdvisor. Narrative Inquiry, 22(1): 105–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vidulin, V., Luštrek, M., & Gams, M. 2009. Multi-label approaches to web genre identification. Journal for Language Technology and Computational Linguistics 24(1): 97–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×