Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-cnmwb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T08:06:28.489Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

11 - Regulation of long-term care in the United States

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2014

David Stevenson
Affiliation:
Vanderbilt University School of Medicine
Jeffrey Bramson
Affiliation:
Harvard Law School
Vincent Mor
Affiliation:
Brown University, Rhode Island
Tiziana Leone
Affiliation:
London School of Economics and Political Science
Anna Maresso
Affiliation:
London School of Economics and Political Science
Get access

Summary

Introduction

The market for nursing home care and other long-term care services is one of the most heavily regulated sectors in the US economy. Although long-term care regulations often serve secondary ends, such as controlling provider supply or regulating the price of services, the majority of these rules are designed to ensure the quality and appropriateness of services. There are different theories for the presence of regulation but a standard explanation is that they exist to address some type of market failure, such as consumers’ inability to assess, monitor and respond to low-quality care. Thus, government regulation can assist uninformed consumers by developing quality standards, evaluating whether those standards are met, and enforcing improvement when standards are not met. In addition, regulatory standards address the market and political power of nursing facilities and chains relative to residents, who are often sick, elderly and vulnerable.

While similar factors could apply to regulation of other industries, the large degree of public financing for long-term care services in the United States further justifies the extensive governmental intervention. Indeed, although the government itself owns very few long-term care facilities, the federal and state governments are the primary payers for services delivered in these settings. Medicare, a federal entitlement programme of health insurance coverage for the elderly and other protected classes, pays for the majority of post-acute (following acute hospital discharge) nursing home, home health and rehabilitative care. This programme is complemented by Medicaid, a means-tested social insurance programme for certain categories of individuals, primarily regulated and financed by the federal government but administered by the individual states. Medicaid is the primary payer for long-term services and supports, including the large majority of chronic nursing home care, in the United States.

Type
Chapter
Information
Regulating Long-Term Care Quality
An International Comparison
, pp. 289 - 323
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arling, G. (2009). Medicaid nursing pay-for-performance: where do we stand? The Gerontologist, 49(5): 587–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Binstock, R. H. et al. (1996). The Future of Long-Term Care: Social and Policy Issues. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Briesacher, B. A. et al. (2009). Can pay-for-performance take nursing home care to the next level? Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 56(10): 1,937–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown: Alpert Medical School (2011). Create custom reports on long-term care. Available at: .
Castle, N. G. (2009). The nursing home compare report card: consumers’ use and understanding. Journal of Aging and Social Policy, 21(2): 187–208.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Castle, N. G. and Lowe, T. J. (2005). Report cards and nursing homes. The Gerontologist, 45(1): 48–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
CMS: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (2006). Report to Congress on the evaluation of the Quality Improvement Organization (QIO) Program for Medicare beneficiaries for fiscal year 2006. Available at: .
CMS: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (2007). Evaluation of the Quality Indicator Survey (QIS). Available at: .
CMS: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (2011a). Certification and compliance: nursing homes. Available at: .
CMS: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (2011b). HCBS waivers – section 1915(c). Available at: .
Cooke, V. et al. (2010). Minnesota’s nursing facility performance-based incentive payment program: an innovative model for promoting care quality. The Gerontologist, 50(4): 556–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Furrow, B. R. et al. (2008). Health Law: Cases, Materials and Problems (6th edn). St Paul: West.Google Scholar
Furrow, B. R. (2010). Healthcare Reform Supplement to Health Law: Cases, Materials and Problems. St Paul: West.Google Scholar
GAO: Government Accountability Office (1987). Medicare and Medicaid: stronger enforcement of nursing home requirements needed. Available at: .
GAO: Government Accountability Office (1998). California nursing homes: care problems persist despite federal and state oversight. Available at: .
GAO: Government Accountability Office (1999). Nursing homes: additional steps needed to strengthen enforcement of federal quality standards. Available at: .
GAO: Government Accountability Office (2002). Nursing homes: more can be done to protect residents from abuse. Available at: .
GAO: Government Accountability Office (2003). Prevalence of serious problems, while declining, reinforces importance of enhanced oversight. Available at: .
GAO: Government Accountability Office (2007). Efforts to strengthen federal enforcement have not deterred some homes from repeatedly harming residents. Available at: .
GAO: Government Accountability Office (2008). Nursing homes: federal monitoring surveys demonstrate continued understatement of serious care problems and CMS oversight weaknesses. Available at: .
GAO: Government Accountability Office (2009). Medicare and Medicaid participating facilities: CMS needs to reexamine its approach for funding state oversight of healthcare facilities. Available at: .
Grabowski, D. C. and Town, R. J. (2011). Does information matter? Competition, quality, and the impact of nursing home report cards. Health Services Research, 46(6pt1): 1,698–1,719.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harrington, C. and Millman, M. (2001). Nursing Home Staffing Standards in State Statutes and Regulations. San Francisco: Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. University of California, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Harrington, C. et al. (2010). Nursing, Facilities, Staffing, Residents, and Facility Deficiencies, 2004 through 2009. San Francisco: Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences. University of California, San Francisco.Google Scholar
HEW: Department of Health, Education, and Welfare (1972). In-patient health facilities as reported from the 1967 MFI Survey. Available at: .
IOM: Institute of Medicine (1986). Improving the Quality of Care in Nursing Homes. Washington: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
IOM: Institute of Medicine (2001). Improving the Quality of Long-Term Care. Washington: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
Kane, R. A., et al. (1998). The Heart of Long-Term Care. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kane, R. L. and Kane, R. A. (2001). What older people want from long-term care, and how they can get it. Health Affairs, 20(5): 114–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kapp, M. B. (2000). Quality of care and quality of life in nursing facilities: what’s regulation got to do with it? McGeorge Law Review, 31(3): 707–31.Google Scholar
Kaye, H. S., Harrington, C., and LaPlante, M. P. (2010). Long-term care: who gets it, who provides it, who pays, and how much? Health Affairs, 29(1): 11–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Konetzka, R. T., et al. (2010). Applying market-based reforms to long-term care. Health Affairs, 29(1): 74–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Medicare.gov (2011). Nursing Home Compare. Available at: .
MedPac (2010). A data book: healthcare spending and the Medicare Program, pp. 129–53. Available at: .
Mendelson, M. A. (1974). Tender Loving Greed: How the Incredibly Lucrative Nursing Home ‘Industry’ is Exploiting America’s Old People and Defrauding Us All (1st edn). New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Miller, E. A. and Mor, V. (2006). Out of the Shadows: Envisioning a Brighter Future for Long-Term Care in America. Chapter 6: Modernizing regulation. Report for the National Commission for Quality Long-Term Care. Providence, Rhode Island: Brown University, Center for Gerontology and Healthcare Research.Google Scholar
Mollica, R., Sims-Kastelein, K., and O’Keefe, J. (2008). Assisted living and residential care policy compendium, 2007 update. Portland: National Academy for State Health Policy. Available at: .
Mor, V. (2005). Improving the quality of long-term care with better information. Milbank Quarterly, 83(3): 333–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mor, V. (2011). Cost of nursing home regulation: building a research agenda. Medical Care, 49(6): 525–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mor, V., et al. (2003). The quality of quality measurement in United States nursing homes. The Gerontologist, 43(SII): 37–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mor, V. (2010). The taste for regulation in long-term care. Medical Care Research Review, 67(4): 38S–64S.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moss, F. E. and Halamandaris, V. J. (1977). Too Old, Too Sick, Too Bad: Nursing Homes in America. Germantown: Aspen Systems Corporation.Google Scholar
Mukamel, D. B., et al. (2007). Nursing homes’ response to the Nursing Home Compare report card. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 62B(4): S218–S225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mukamel, D. B. (2008). Publication of quality report cards and trends in reported quality measures in nursing homes. Health Services Research, 43(4): 1,244–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mukamel, D. B., et al.(2011). Does state regulation of quality impose costs on nursing homes? Medical Care, 49(6): 529–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
NCSL: National Conference of State Legislatures (2011). Certificate of need: state health laws and programs. Available at: .
NHPF: National Health Policy Forum (2011). National spending for long-term services and supports (LTSS). Available at: .
O’Brien, E. (2005). Long-term care: understanding Medicaid’s role for the elderly and disabled. Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured. Available at: .Google Scholar
OIG: Office of the Inspector General (1999a). Nursing home survey and certification: overall capacity. Available at: .
OIG: Office of the Inspector General (1999b). Quality of care in nursing homes: an overview. Available at: .
OIG: Office of the Inspector General (2004). Inspection results on Nursing Home Compare: completeness and accuracy. Available at: .
OIG: Office of the Inspector General (2006a). Nursing home complaint investigations. Available at: .
OIG: Office of the Inspector General (2006b). Nursing home enforcement: application of mandatory remedies. Available at: .
OIG: Office of the Inspector General (2008). Memorandum report: ‘Trends in nursing home deficiencies and complaints’. Available at: .
OIG: Office of the Inspector General (2009). Nursing home corporations under quality of care corporate integrity agreements. Available at: .
Rantz, M. J., et al. (1999). Minimum data set and resident assessment instrument: can using standardized assessment improve clinical practice and outcomes of care? Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 25(6): 35–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heckler, Smith v. In re the Estate of Michael Patrick Smith v. Heckler, 747 F.2d 583 (10th Cir. 1984).
Stevenson, D. G. (2006). Nursing home consumer complaints and quality of care – a national view. Medical Care Research and Review, 63(3): 347–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stevenson, D. G. and Grabowski, D. C. (2008). Private equity investment and nursing home care: is it a big deal? Health Affairs, 27(5): 1,399–408.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stevenson, D. G. and Grabowski, D. C. (2010). Sizing up the market for sssisted living, Health Affairs, 29(1): 35–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevenson, D. G. and Studdert, D. M. (2003). The rise of nursing home litigation: findings from a national survey of attorneys. Health Affairs, 22(2): 219–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stevenson, D. G. et al. (2010). The complementarity of public and private long-term care coverage. Health Affairs, 29(1): 96–101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stoil, M. J. (1994). Surveyors stymied by survey criteria, researchers find. Nursing Homes, 43(4): 58.Google Scholar
Studdert, D. M. et al. (2011). Relationship between quality of care and negligence litigation in nursing homes. New England Journal of Medicine, 364(13): 1,243–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tumlinson, A. et al. (2007). Long term care in America: an introduction. National Commission for Quality Long-Term Care. Available at: .
Vladeck, B. C. and Twentieth Century Fund (1980). Unloving Care: The Nursing Home Tragedy. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Walshe, K. (2001). Regulating United States nursing homes: are we learning from experience?Health Affairs, 20(6): 128–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Werner, R. M., Konetzka, R. T. and Kruse, G. B. (2009). Impact of public reporting on unreported quality of care. Health Services Research, 44(2.1): 379–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Werner, R. M. et al. (2010). State adoption of nursing home pay-for-performance. Medical Care Research and Review, 67(3): 364–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Werner, R. M. (2011). Changes in patient sorting to nursing homes under public reporting: improved patient matching or provider gaming? Health Services Research, 46(2): 555–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zimmerman, D. et al. (2003). Nursing Home Complaint Investigation: Building the Model System. Baltimore: CMS.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, S. et al. (2005) How good is assisted living? Findings and implications from an outcomes study. Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Science Sciences and Social Sciences, 60(4): S195–S204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×