Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vsgnj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T16:26:11.175Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - On the interface of criminal justice and regulation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 February 2011

Hannah Quirk
Affiliation:
University of Manchester
Toby Seddon
Affiliation:
University of Manchester
Graham Smith
Affiliation:
University of Manchester
Get access

Summary

At first glance, one might be tempted to regard systems of regulation and of criminal justice as essentially unrelated. But like humans compared to other primates, regulation and criminal justice have much in common. The theorists and practitioners of each have learned a great deal, and have a great deal yet to learn, from each other. This chapter will explore the interface of regulation and criminal justice. It will identify how principles and strategies of each have been used, with varying success, by devotees of the other. First, it will discuss criminal justice as an instrument of regulation. Criminal justice is, in fact, one component of a regulatory system; the most egregious examples of regulatory non-compliance may incur criminal liability. Then, the chapter will discuss regulation as an instrument of criminal justice. There are many regulatory activities that are incidental to criminal justice. When functioning properly, these may preclude the necessity for mobilizing the criminal process. A great deal of crime prevention, for example, is based on regulation. The chapter will then explore some common theoretical bases. Both regulation more generally, and criminal justice as a subset, can entail similar techniques, such as contracting out, or the use of coercive powers. Their relative efficiency and effectiveness within and between regulatory and criminal justice domains is an important question. Finally, the chapter will discuss normative principles that might govern the various measures that might be brought to bear in regulatory and criminal justice domains.

Type
Chapter
Information
Regulation and Criminal Justice
Innovations in Policy and Research
, pp. 72 - 100
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbot, C. (2007) personal communication, 6 November.
Abbot, C. (2009) Enforcing Pollution Control Regulation. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
Alston, K. and Roberts, J. P. (1999) ‘Partners in New Product Development: SC Johnson and the Alliance for Environmental Innovation’, Corporate Environmental Strategy, 6, 110–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayling, J. and Grabosky, P. (2006a) ‘Policing By Command: Enhancing Law Enforcement Capacity Through Coercion’, Law and Policy, 28(4), 420–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayling, J. and Grabosky, P. (2006b) ‘When Police Go Shopping’, Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management, 29(4), 665–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayling, J., Grabosky, P. and Shearing, C. (2009) Lengthening the Arm of the Law: Enhancing Police Resources in the Twenty-first Century. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ayres, I. and Braithwaite, J. (1992) Responsive Regulation: Transcending the Deregulation Debate. New York, NY:Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, J. (1985) To Punish or Persuade: Enforcement of Coal Mine Safety. Albany, NY:State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, J. and Makkai, T. (1994) ‘Trust and Compliance’, Policing and Society, 4(1), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braithwaite, J. and Pettit, P. (1990) Not Just Deserts: A Republican Theory of Criminal Justice. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, V. (2009) ‘Tax Evasion’, in Tonry, M. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Crime and Public Policy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, pp. 381–405.Google Scholar
Cherney, A., O'Reilly, J. and Grabosky, P. (2006a) ‘The Multilateralization of Policing: The Case of Illicit Synthetic Drug Control’, Police Practice and Research, 7(3), 177–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grabosky, P. N. (2006b) ‘Networks and Meta-Regulation: Strategies Aimed at Governing Illicit Synthetic Drugs’, Policing and Society, 16(4), 370–85.Google Scholar
Coffee, John C. (2004) ‘Gatekeeper Failure and Reform: The Challenge of Fashioning Relevant Reforms’University of California, Berkeley, Law and Economics Workshop, paper no. 9.Google Scholar
Donohue, L. K. (2008) The Cost of Counterterrorism: Power, Politics and Liberty. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felson, Marcus (2006) Crime and Nature. Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.Google Scholar
Freiberg, A. (1999) ‘Commercial Confidentiality and Public Accountability for the Provision of Correctional Services’, Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 11, 119–34.Google Scholar
Fung, A., Graham, M. and Weil, D. (2007) Full Disclosure: The Perils and Promise of Transparency. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galanter, M. (1981) ‘Justice in Many Rooms’, Journal of Legal Pluralism, 19, 1–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gittleman, C. and Sacks, R. D. (2008) ‘The Development of US Regulation of Broker–Dealer Research’, Journal of Investment Compliance, 9(2), 12–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, H. (1990) Problem Oriented Policing. New York, NY:McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Grabosky, P. N. (1992) ‘Law Enforcement and the Citizen: Non-Governmental Participants in Crime Prevention and Control’, Policing and Society, 2, 249–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grabosky, P. N. (1994) ‘Green Markets: Environmental Regulation by the Private Sector’, Law and Policy, 16(4), 420–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grabosky, P. N. (1995) ‘Using Non-governmental Resources to Foster Regulatory Compliance’, Governance, 8(4), 527–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grabosky, P. N. (1995) ‘Regulation by Reward: On the Use of Incentives as Regulatory Instruments, Law and Policy, 17(3), 256–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grabosky, P. and Braithwaite, J. (1986) Of Manners Gentle: Enforcement Strategies of Australian Business Regulatory Agencies. Melbourne:Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Greve, M. (1989) ‘Environmentalism and Bounty Hunting’, Public Interest, 97, 15–29.Google Scholar
Gunningham, N. and Grabosky, P. (1998) Smart Regulation. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Katyal, N. (2002) ‘Architecture as Crime Control’, Yale Law Journal, 111(5), 1039–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kettl, D. (1993) Sharing Power: Public Governance and Private Markets. Washington, DC:Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
King, T. and Richards, J. (2003) Australian Local Government: Alcohol Harm Minimization Projects – A Good Practice Guide. Report prepared by Turning Point.
Grabosky, P. N.www.alcohol.gov.au/internet/alcohol/publishing.nsf/Content/resources-harm-minimisation/$FILE/alc_harm.pdf (visited 16 April 2009).
Kraakman, R. H. (1986) ‘Gatekeepers: The Anatomy of a Third-Party Enforcement Strategy’, Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 2, 53–104.Google Scholar
Langpap, C. (2008) ‘Self-reporting and Private Enforcement in Environmental Regulation’, Environmental and Resource Economics, 40(4), 489–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lessig, L. (2006) Code: Version 2.0. New York, NY:Basic Books.Google Scholar
Lester, A. (2001) ‘Crime Reduction Through Product Design’, Trends and Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice, 206. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology.Google Scholar
Loft, C. (2007) personal communication, 5 November.
Mahoney, P. G. (1997) ‘The Exchange as Regulator’, Virginia Law Review, 83(7), Symposium: The Allocation of Government Authority (Oct. 1997), 1453–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Makkai, T. and Braithwaite, J. (1994b) ‘The Dialectics of Corporate Deterrence’, Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 31(4), 347–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazerolle, L. and Ransley, J. (2005) Third Party Policing. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Osborne, D. and Gaebler, T. (1992) Reinventing Government. Boston, MA:Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Regan, P. (2004) ‘Old Issues, New Context: Privacy, Information Collection, and Homeland Security’, Government Information Quarterly, 21(4), 481–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reuter, P. and Truman, E. M. (2004) Chasing Dirty Money: The Fight Against Money Laundering. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
Richardson, B. J. (2001) ‘Mandating Environmental Liability Insurance’, Duke Environmental Law and Policy Forum, 12, 293–329.Google Scholar
Schmitter, P. and Lehmbruch, G. (eds.) (1979) Trends Towards Corporatist Intermediation. Beverly Hills, CA:Sage.
Shapiro, S. (1987) ‘Policing Trust’, in Shearing, C. and Stenning, P. (eds.), Private Policing. Beverly Hills, CA:Sage, pp. 194–220.Google Scholar
Shearing, C. (2003) ‘A Constitutive Conception of Regulation’, in P. Grabosky and J. Braithwaite (eds.), Business Regulation and Australia's Future. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology, 1993, pp. 67–80.Google Scholar
Smith, N. C. (2001) ‘Changes in Corporate Practices in Response to Public Interest Advocacy and Actions’, in Bloom, Paul N. and Gundlach, Gregory Thomas (eds.), Handbook of Marketing and Society. Beverly Hills, CA:Sage, pp. 140–61.Google Scholar
Sparrow, M. (2000) The Regulatory Craft: Controlling Risks, Solving Problems, and Managing Compliance. Washington, DC:Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Streeck, W. and Schmitter, P. (1985) ‘Community, Market, State and Association? The Prospective Contribution of Interest Governance to Social Order’, in Streeck, and Schmitter, (eds.), Private Interest Government: Beyond Market and State. Beverly Hills, CA:Sage, pp. 1–29.Google Scholar
Tarr, R. W., McGurk, V. and Jones, C. (2005) ‘Intermodal Transportation Safety and Security Issues: Training against “Terrorism”’, Journal of Public Transportation, 8(4), 87–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ventry, D. J. (2008) ‘Whistleblowers and Qui Tam for Tax’, Tax Lawyer, 61(2), 357–406.Google Scholar
Police, Victoria (2005) Victoria Police Organized Crime Strategy, 2005–2009. Melbourne: Victoria Police.Google Scholar
Weatherburn, D. and Grabosky, P. (1999) ‘Strategic Approaches to Property Crime Control’, Policing and Society, 9, 77–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, J., Fleming, J. and Marks, M. (2008) ‘Building the Capacity of Police Change Agents: The Nexus Policing Project’, Policing and Society, 18(1), 72–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×