References

Jim Rossi

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511511080.011

Adams, Henry Carter. 1887 (January). “Relation of the State to Industrial Action.” Publications of the American Economics Association. 1: 55Google Scholar

Ahdieh, Robert B. 2004. “Law's Signal: A Cueing Theory of Law in Market Transition.” Southern California Law Review. 77: 215Google Scholar

Alexander, Barbara & The National Consumer Law Center. 1996. Consumer Protection Proposals for Retail Electric Competition: Model Legislation and RegulationsBoston: National Consumer Law CenterGoogle Scholar

Alexander, Gregory S. 1996. “Ten Years of Takings.” Journal of Legal Education. 46: 586Google Scholar

Alston, Lee J., Eggertsson, Thráinn & North, Douglas C., eds. Empirical Studies in Institutional ChangeCambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRef

Areeda, Phillip E. & Hovenkamp, Herbert. 2000. IA Antitrust Law, Second edition. Boston: Little, BrownGoogle Scholar

Arteburn, Norman F. 1927. “The Origin and First Test of Public Callings.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review. 75: 411CrossRef Google Scholar

Austin, Regina. 1983. “The Insurance Classification Controversy.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review. 131: 517CrossRef Google Scholar

Averch, Harvey & Johnson, Leland L. 1962. “Behavior of the Firm Under Regulatory Constraint.” American Economic Review. 52: 1052Google Scholar

Aviram, Amitai. 2003. “Regulation by Networks.” Brigham Young University Law Review. 2003: 1179Google Scholar

Ayres, Ian & Braithwaite, John. 1992. Responsive Regulation: Transcending the Deregulation Debate. New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Ayres, Ian & Gertner, Robert. 1992. “Strategic Contractual Inefficiency and the Optimal Choice of Legal Rules.” Yale Law Journal. 101: 729CrossRef Google Scholar

Baer, William J. 1997. “FTC Perspectives on Competition Policy and Enforcement Initiatives in Electric Power.” Presented at the Conference on the New Rules of the Game for Electric Power: Antitrust and Anticompetitive Behavior, Bureau of Competition, Federal Trade Commission, Washington, D.C., December 4. Available at http://www.ftc.gov/speeches/other/elec1204.htm

Baker, Scott and Krawiec, Kimberly. 2004. “The Penalty Default Canon.” George Washington Law Review. 72: 663Google Scholar

Baron, David & Ferejohn, John. 1989. “Bargaining in Legislatures.” American Political Science Review. 83: 1181CrossRef Google Scholar

Baumol, William J. & Merrill, Thomas W. 1996. “Deregulatory Takings, Breach of the Regulatory Contract, and the Telecommunications Act of 1996.” New York University Law Review. 72: 1037Google Scholar

Becker, Gary. 1983. “A Theory of Competition Among Pressure Groups for Political Influence.” Quarterly Journal of Economics. 98: 371CrossRef Google Scholar

Beer, Samuel H. 1977. “Political Overload and Federalism.” Polity. 10: 5CrossRef Google Scholar

Berg, Jessica Wilen. 2003. “Understanding Waiver.” Houston Law Review. 40: 281Google Scholar

Bernheim, B. Douglas & Whinston, Michael D.. 1998. “Incomplete Contracts and Strategic Ambiguity.” American Economic Review. 88: 902Google Scholar

Bernstein, David E. 2003. “Lochner's Legacy's Legacy.” Texas Law Review. 82: 1Google Scholar

Bernstein, Lisa. 1992. “Opting Out of the Legal System: Extra Legal Contractual Relations in the Diamond Industry.” Journal of Legal Studies. 21: 115CrossRef Google Scholar

Bernstein, Lisa. 2001. “Private Commercial Law in the Cotton Industry: Creating Cooperation Through Rules, Norms and Institutions.” Michigan Law Review. 99: 1724CrossRef Google Scholar

Bolze, Ray S., Pierce, John C. & Walsh, Linda L., 2000. “Antitrust Law Regulation: A New Focus for a Competitive Energy Industry.” Energy Law Journal. 21: 79Google Scholar

Borenstein, Severin. 2002. “The Trouble with Electricity Markets: Understanding California's Restructuring Disaster.” Journal of Economic Perspectives. 16(1): 191CrossRef Google Scholar

Borenstein, Severin & Bushnell, James D.. 2000. “Electricity Restructuring: Deregulation or Reregulation?” Regulation 23(2): 46Google Scholar

Boudin, Michael. 1986. “Antitrust Doctrine and the Sway of Metaphor.” Georgetown Law Journal. 75: 395Google Scholar

Bouknight, J. A. & Raskin, David B.. 1987. “Planning for Wholesale Customer Loads in a Competitive Environment: The Obligation to Provide Wholesale Service under the Federal Power Act.” Energy Law Journal. 8: 237Google Scholar

Boyes, William J. 1976. “An Empirical Examination of the Averch-Johnson Effect.” Economic Inquiry. 14: 25CrossRef Google Scholar

Bradley, Robert L., Jr. 2003. “The Origins and Development of Electric Power Regulation.” In Grossman, Peter Z. & Cole, Daniel H., eds. The End of a Natural Monopoly: Deregulation and Competition in the Electric Power IndustryAmsterdam: Elsevier Science (JAI Imprint)Google Scholar

Brennan, Timothy J. & Boyd, James. 1997. “Stranded Costs, Takings, and the Law and Economics of Implicit Contracts.” Journal of Regulatory Economics. 11: 41CrossRef Google Scholar

Breyer, Stephen. 1982. Regulation and its Reform. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar

Brown, Stephen J. & Sibley, David S.. 1986. The Theory of Public Utility Pricing. New York: Cambridge University PressCrossRef Google Scholar

Burdick, Charles K. 1911. “The Origin of the Peculiar Duties of Public Service Companies.” Columbia Law Review. 11: 514CrossRef Google Scholar

Buzbee, William W. 2003. “Recognizing the Regulatory Commons: A Theory of Regulatory Gaps.” Iowa Law Review. 89: 1Google Scholar

Cain, Bruce, Ferejohn, John & Fiorina, Morris. 1987. The Personal Vote: Constituency Service and Electoral Independence. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University PressCrossRef Google Scholar

Calabresi, Guido & Douglas, A. Melamed. 1972. “Property Rules, Liability Rules, and Inalienability: One View of the Cathedral.” Harvard Law Review. 85: 1089CrossRef Google Scholar

Candeub, Adam. 2004. “Network Interconnection and Takings.” Syracuse Law Review. 54: 369Google Scholar

Carron, Andrew S. & Paul, W. MacAvoy. 1981. The Decline of Service in Regulated IndustriesWashington, D.C.: American Enterprise InstituteGoogle Scholar

Casson, Mark. 1997. Information and Organization: A New Perspective on the Theory of the FirmNew York: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar

Chen, Jim. 1999. “The Second Coming of Smyth v. Ames.” Texas Law Review. 77: 1535Google Scholar

Chen, Jim. 2000. “Standing in the Shadows of Giants: The Role of Intergenerational Equity in Telecommunications Reform.” University of Colorado Law Review. 71: 921Google Scholar

Chen, Jim. 2003a. “The Vertical Dimension of Cooperative Competition Policy.” Antitrust Bulletin. 48: 1005CrossRef Google Scholar

Chen, Jim. 2003b. “Subsidized Rural Telephony and the Public Interest: A Case Study in Cooperative Federalism and Its Pitfalls.” Journal on Telecommunications & High Technology Law. 2: 307Google Scholar

Chen, Jim. 2003c. “A Vision Softly Creeping: Congressional Acquiesence and the Dormant Commerce Clause.” Minnesota Law Review. 88: 1764Google Scholar

Chen, Jim. 2004. “The Nature of the Public Utility: Infrastructure, the Market, and the Law.” Northwestern University Law Review. 98: 1617Google Scholar

Cirace, John. 1982. “An Economic Analysis of the ‘State-Municipal Action’ Antitrust Cases.” Texas Law Review. 61: 481Google Scholar

Coase, Ronald H. 1937. “The Nature of the Firm.” Economica. 4: 386CrossRef Google Scholar

Coase, Ronald H. 1960. “The Problem of Social Costs.” Journal of Law and Economics. 3: 1CrossRef Google Scholar

Coenen, Dan T. 1989. “Untangling the Market-Participant Exception to the Dormant Commerce Clause.” Michigan Law Review. 88: 395CrossRef Google Scholar

Cohen, George M. 1994. “The Fault Lines in Contract Damages.” Virginia Law Review. 80: 1225CrossRef Google Scholar

Cole, Daniel H. 2003. “The Regulatory Contract.” in Grossman, Peter Z. & Daniel, H. Cole, eds. The End of a Natural Monopoly: Deregulation and Competition in the Electric Power IndustryAmsterdam: Elsevier Science (JAI Imprint)Google Scholar

Colton, Roger. 1991. “A Cost-Based Response to Low-Income Energy Problems.” Public Utilities Fortnightly. March 1: 31Google Scholar

Colton, Roger. 1997. The ‘Obligation to Serve’ and a Competitive Electric Industry. Report of DOE Office of Economic, Electricity and Natural Gas Analysis, May

Costello, Kenneth W. & Robert, J. Graniere. 1997. Deregulation-Restructuring: Evidence from Individual IndustriesColumbus, Ohio: National Regulatory Research InstituteCrossRef Google Scholar

Costello, Kenneth W. & , J. Rodney Lemon. 1996. Unbundling the Retail Natural Gas Market: Current Activities and Guidance for Serving Residential and Small Consumers. Columbus, Ohio: National Regulatory Research InstituteCrossRef Google Scholar

Courville, Leon. 1974. “Regulation and Efficiency in the Electric Utility Industry.” Bell Journal of Economic and Management Science. 5: 53CrossRef Google Scholar

Cramton, Roger C. 1986. “Demystifying Legal Scholarship.” Georgetown Law Journal. 75: 1Google Scholar

Cudahy, Richard D. 2002a. “Electric Deregulation after California: Down But Not Out.” Administrative Law Review. 54: 333Google Scholar

Cudahy, Richard D. 2002b. “Full Circle in the Formerly Regulated Industries?” Loyola University of Chicago Law Journal. 33: 767Google Scholar

Davis, Mary J. 2002. “Unmasking the Presumption in Favor of Preemption.” Southern California Law Review. 53: 967Google Scholar

Figueiredo, John M. & Figueiredo, Rui J. P. Jr. 2002. “The Allocation of Resources by Interest Groups: Lobbying, Litigation and Administrative Regulation.” Business and Politics. 4(2): 161CrossRef Google Scholar

Dechert, W. Davis. 1984. “Has the Averch-Johnson Effect Been Theoretically Justified?” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control. 8: 1CrossRef Google Scholar

Deisinger, Chris. 2000. “The Backlash Against Merchant Plants and the Need for a New Regulatory Model.” Electricity Journal. 13: 51CrossRef Google Scholar

Demsetz, Harold. 1968. “Why Regulate Utilities?” Journal of Law & Economics. 11: 55CrossRef Google Scholar

Denning, Brannon P. 1999. “Justice Thomas, the Import-Export Clause, and Camps Newfound/Owatonna v. Harrison.” University of Colorado Law Review. 70: 155Google Scholar

Denning, Brannon P. 2003. “Why the Privileges and Immunities Clause of Article IV Cannot Replace the Dormant Commerce Clause Doctrine.” Minnesota Law Review. 84: 284Google Scholar

Derthick, Martha & Paul, J. Quirk. 1985. The Politics of Deregulation. Washington, D.C.: BrookingsGoogle Scholar

Dibadj, Reza. 2004. “Saving Antitrust.” University of Colorado Law Review. 75: 745Google Scholar

Diver, Colin. 1983. “The Optimal Precision of Administrative Rules.” Yale Law Journal. 93: 65CrossRef Google Scholar

Dorf, Michael H. & Charles, F. Sabel. 1998. “A Constitution of Democratic Experimentalism.” Columbia Law Review. 98: 267CrossRef Google Scholar

Easterbrook, Frank H. 1984. “The Limits of Antitrust.” Texas Law Review. 63: 1Google Scholar

Easterbrook, Frank H. 1988. “The Role of Original Intent in Statutory Construction.” Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy. 11: 59Google Scholar

Eaton, Jade Alice. 1994. “Recent United States Department of Justice Actions in the Electric Utility Industry.” Connecticut Journal of International Law. 9: 857Google Scholar

Economides, Nicholas. 2003. “The Tragic Inefficiency of the M-ECPR.” in Shampine, Allan L., ed. Down to the Wire: Studies in the Diffusion and Regulation of Telecommunications TechnologiesHauppauge, N.Y.: Nova Science PublishersGoogle Scholar

Eggertsson, Thráinn. 1996. “A Note on the Economics of Institutions.” in Alston, Lee J., Eggertsson, Thráinn & Douglas, C. North, eds. Empirical Studies in Institutional ChangeCambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRef Google Scholar

Elhauge, Einer. 2002. “Preference-Eliciting Statutory Default Rules.” Columbia Law Review. 102: 2163Google Scholar

Ellickson, Robert. 1994. Order Without Law: How Neighbors Settle Disputes. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar

Ely, John Hart. 1980. Democracy and Distrust: A Theory of Judicial ReviewCambridge, Mass.: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar

Ely, Richard T. 1887. “The Nature and Significance of the Corporation.” Harper's Magazine. 75: 71Google Scholar

Engel, Kristen H. 1999. “The Dormant Commerce Clause Threat to Market-Based Regulation: The Case of Electricity Deregulation.” Ecology Law Quarterly. 26: 243Google Scholar

Epstein, Richard A. 1984. “Toward a Revitalization of the Contract Clause.” University of Chicago Law Review. 51: 703CrossRef Google Scholar

Epstein, Richard A. 1985. Takings: Private Property and the Power of Eminent Domain. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar

Epstein, Richard A. 1995. “The Permit Power Meets the Constitution.” Iowa Law Review 81: 407Google Scholar

Epstein, Richard A. 1997a. “A Clear View from The Cathedral: The Dominance of Property Rules.” Yale Law Journal. 106: 2091, 2128CrossRef Google Scholar

Epstein, Richard A. 1997b. “Takings, Exclusivity and Speech: The Legacy of Prune Yard v. Robins.” University of Chicago Law Review. 64: 21CrossRef Google Scholar

Eskridge, William N. Jr. & Philip, P. Frickey. 1992. “Quasi-Constitutional Law: Clear Statement Rules as Constitutional Lawmaking.” Vanderbilt Law Review. 45: 593Google Scholar

Eule, Julian N. 1982. “Laying the Dormant Commerce Clause to Rest.” Yale Law Journal. 91: 425CrossRef Google Scholar

Farber, Daniel A. 1991. Legislative Deals and Statutory Bequests. Minnesota Law Review. 75: 667Google Scholar

Farber, Daniel A. & Philip, Frickey. 1991. Law and Public Choice: A Critical IntroductionChicago: University of Chicago PressCrossRef Google Scholar

Ferrey, Steven. 1997. “Renewable Subsidies in the Age of Deregulation: State-Imposed Preferences May Have Come to the Wrong Place at the Wrong Time.” Fortnightly. December: 22Google Scholar

Fisch, Jill E. 1997. “Retroactivity and Legal Change: An Equilibrium Approach.” Harvard Law Review. 110: 1055CrossRef Google Scholar

Fox-Penner, Peter. 1997. Electric Utility Restructuring: A Guide to the Competitive Era. Vienna, Virginia: Public Utility ReportsGoogle Scholar

Frankfurter, Felix & Landis, James. 1925. “The Compact Clause of the Constitution – A Study in Interstate Adjustments.” Yale Law Journal. 34: 685CrossRef Google Scholar

Freeman, Jody. 1997. “Collaborative Governance in the Administrative State.” UCLA Law Review. 45: 1Google Scholar

Freeman, Jody. 2000. “The Contracting State.” Florida State University Law Review. 28: 155Google Scholar

Friendly, Henry J. 1964. “In Praise of Erie – And of the New Federal Common Law.” New York University Law Review. 39: 383Google Scholar

Furubotn, Eirik G. & Rudolf, Richter. 1998. Institutions and Economic Theory: The Contribution of the New Institutional Economics. Ann Arbor: University of Michig an PressGoogle Scholar

Garbaum, Stephen A. 1994. “The Nature of Preemption.” Cornell Law Review. 79: 767Google Scholar

Garland, Merrick B. 1987. “Antitrust and State Action: Economic Efficiency and the Political Process.” Yale Law Journal. 96: 486CrossRef Google Scholar

Gey, Steven G. 1989–90. “The Political Economy of the Dormant Commerce Clause.” NYU Review of Law & Social Change. 17: 1Google Scholar

Gifford, Daniel J. 1995. “Federalism, Efficiency, the Commerce Clause, and the Sherman Act: Why We Should Follow a Consistent Free Market Policy.” Emory Law Journal. 44: 1227Google Scholar

Gillette, Clayton. 1991. “In Partial Praise of Dillon's Rule, or, Can Public Choice Theory Justify Local Government Law?” Chicago-Kent Law Review. 67: 959Google Scholar

Gilliam, Thomas J. Jr. 1997. “Contracting with the United States in its Role as Regulator: Striking a Bargain with an Equitable Sovereign or Capricious Siren.” Mississippi College Law Review. 18: 247Google Scholar

Glazer, Craig A. & , M. Bryan Little. 1999. “The Rolesof Antitrust Law and Regulatory Oversight in the Restructured Electricity Industry.” Electricity Journal. 12: 21CrossRef Google Scholar

Goldberg, Victor. 1976. “Regulation and Administered Contracts.” Bell Journal of Economics. 7: 444CrossRef Google Scholar

Goldsmith, Richard. 1989. “Utility Rates and ‘Takings’.” Energy Law Journal. 10: 241Google Scholar

Gómez-Ibáñez, José A. 2003. Regulating Infrastructure: Monopoly Contracts and DiscretionCambridge, Mass.: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar

Goodin, Robert E. 1982. Political Theory and Public Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar

Goodman, James. 2003. BlackoutNew York: North Point PressGoogle Scholar

Gormley, William T. Jr. 1983. The Politics of Public Utility Regulation. Pittsburgh: University of Pitts burgh PressGoogle Scholar

Grossman, Peter Z. 2003. “Is Anything Naturally aMonopoly?” in Grossman, Peter Z. & Daniel, H. Cole, eds. The End of a Natural Monopoly: Deregulation and Competition in the Electric Power Industry. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science (JAIImprint)Google Scholar

Grossman, Peter Z. & Daniel, H. Cole. 2003. The End of a Natural Monopoly: Deregulation and Competition in the Electric Power Industry. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science (JAIImprint)Google Scholar

Haar, Charles M. & Daniel, W. Fessler. 1986. The Wrong Side of the Tracks: A Revolutionary Rediscovery of the Common Law Tradition of Fairness in the Struggle Against Inequality. New York: Simon & SchusterGoogle Scholar

Hadfield, Gillian. 1999. “Of Sovereignty and Contract: Damages for Breach of Contract by the Government.” Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal. 8: 467Google Scholar

Hale, G. E. & Hale, Rosemary. 1962. “Competition or Control VI: Application of Antitrust Laws to Regulated Industries.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review. 111: 46CrossRef Google Scholar

Hall, Gus & Pierce, Richard., 1997. “Retail Gas Reform: Learning from the Georgia Model.” Public Utilities Fortnightly. April 15: 22Google Scholar

Hart, Oliver & Moore, John. 1999. “Foundations of Incomplete Contracts.” Review of Economic Studies. 66: 115CrossRef Google Scholar

Hart, Oliver D. 1988. “Incomplete Contracts and the Theory of the Firm.” Journal of Law, Economics and Organization. 4: 119Google Scholar

Hart, Oliver D. 1995. Firms, Contracts, and Financial Structure. Oxford: Oxford University PressCrossRef Google Scholar

Hills, Roderick M. Jr. 1999. “Dissecting the State:The Use of Federal Law to Free State and Local Officials from State Legislatures'Control.” Michigan Law Review. 97: 1201CrossRef Google Scholar

Hills, Roderick M., Jr. 2003. “Against Preemption:How Federalism Can Improve the National Lawmaking Process.” Working paper available at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=412000

Hirsh, Richard F. 1999. Power Loss: The Origins of Deregulation and Restructuring in the American Electric Utility IndustryCambridge, Mass.: MIT PressGoogle Scholar

Hirst, Eric & Baxter, Lester. 1995. “How Stranded Will Electric Utilities Be?” Public Utilities Fortnightly Feb. 15: 30–32Google Scholar

Hoke, S. Candice. 1991. “Preemption Pathologies and Civic Republican Values.” Boston University Law Review. 71: 685Google Scholar

Holmes, Oliver Wendell. 1920. Collected Legal Papers. New York: Harcourt, Brace &CoGoogle Scholar

Horwich, Allan. 2000. “The Neglected Relationship of Materiality and Recklessness in Actions under Rule 10b-5.” Business Lawyer. 55: 1023Google Scholar

Hovenkamp, Herbert. 1991. Enterpriseand American Law, 1836–1937. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar

Hovenkamp, Herbert. 1999a. Federal Antitrust Policy: The Law of Competition and Its PracticeSt. Paul, Minnesota: West GroupGoogle Scholar

Hovenkamp, Herbert. 1999b. “The Takings Clause and Improvident Regulatory Bargains.” Yale Law Journal. 108: 801CrossRef Google Scholar

Humphrey, Andrew G. 1985. “Antitrust Jurisdiction and Remedies in an Electric Utility Price Squeeze.” University of Chicago Law Review. 52: 1090

Inman, Robert P. & Daniel, L. Rubinfeld. 1997. “Making Sense of the Antitrust State-Action Doctrine: Balancing Political Participation and Economic Efficiency in Regulatory Federalism.” Texas Law Review. 75: 1203Google Scholar

Isser, Steve & Steven, A. Mitnick. 1998. “Enron's Battle with PECO.” Public Utilities Fortnightly Mar. 1: 38Google Scholar

Jaffe, Louis L. 1964. “Primary Jurisdiction.” Harvard Law Review. 77: 1037CrossRef Google Scholar

Joskow, Paul. 1977. “Commercial Impossibility, the Uranium Market, and the Westinghouse Case.” Journal of Legal Studies. 6: 119CrossRef Google Scholar

Joskow, Paul J. 2001. “California's Electricity Crisis.” Oxford Journal of Economic Policy. 17: 365CrossRef Google Scholar

Joskow, Paul & Roger G. Noll. 1981. “Regulation in Theory and Practice: An Overview.” in Fromm, Gary, ed. Studies in Public Utility RegulationCambridge, Massachusetts: MIT PressGoogle Scholar

Joskow, Paul & Schmalensee, Richard. 1983. Markets for Power: An Analysis of Electrical Utility Deregulation. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT PressGoogle Scholar

Kalt, Joseph P. & Mark, A. Zupan. 1984. “Capture and Ideology in the Economic Theory of Politics.” American Economic Review. 74: 279Google Scholar

Kaplow, Louis. 1985. “Extension of Monopoly Power Through Leverage.” Columbia Law Review. 85: 515CrossRef Google Scholar

Kaplow, Louis. 1986. “An Economic Analysis of Legal Transitions.” Harvard Law Review. 99: 509CrossRef Google Scholar

Kearney, Joseph D. & Thomas, W. Merrill. 1998. The Great Transformation of Regulated Industries Law. Columbia Law Review. 98: 1323CrossRef Google Scholar

Kelly, Kevin. 1997. “New Rules for the New Economy.” Wired Sept.: 140, 142–43Google Scholar

Kingdon, John W. 1995. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public PoliciesBoston: Addison WesleyGoogle Scholar

Kolasky, William J. 1999. “Network Effects: AContrarian View.” George Mason Law Review. 7: 577Google Scholar

Komesar, Neil K. 2001. Law'sLimits: The Rule of Law and the Supply and Demand of Rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Kutler, Stanley. 1971. Privilege and Creative Destruction: The Charles River Bridge Case. Baltimore: John Hopkins University PressGoogle Scholar

Kuttner, Robert. 1999. Everythingfor Sale: The Virtues and Limits of Markets. Chicago: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar

Laffont, Jean-Jacques & Tirole, Jean. 1990. “Adverse Selection and Renegotiation in Procurement.” Review of Economic Studies. 57: 597–626CrossRef Google Scholar

Laffont, Jean-Jacques & Tirole, Jean. 1993. A Theory of Incentives in Procurement and Regulation. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT PressGoogle Scholar

Laffont, Jean-Jacques & Tirole, Jean. 2000. Competition in Telecommunications. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT PressGoogle Scholar

Laswell, Harold. 1971. APre-View of the Policy Sciences. New York: American ElsevierGoogle Scholar

Lemley, Mark & McGowan, David. 1998. “Legal Implications of Network Economic Effects.” California Law Review. 86: 479CrossRef Google Scholar

Lesser, Jonathon A. & Ainspan, Malcolm D.. 1994. “Retail Wheeling: Deja Vu All Over Again?” The Electricity Journal. Apr.: 34CrossRef Google Scholar

Levinson, Daryl. 2000. “Making Government Pay:Markets, Politics, and the Allocation of Constitutional Costs.” University of Chicago Law Review. 67: 345CrossRef Google Scholar

Lewis, Tracy & Poitevin, Michael. 1997. “Disclosure of Information in Regulatory Proceedings.” Journal of Law, Economics &Organization. 13: 50CrossRef Google Scholar

Levy, Brian & Pablo, T. Spiller. 1996. Regulations, Institutions and Commitment: Comparative Studies of Telecommunications. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRef Google Scholar

Lichtman, Douglas, Baker, Scott & Krause, Kate. 2000. “Strategic Disclosure in the Patent System.” Vanderbilt Law Review. 53: 2175Google Scholar

Lopatka, John E. 1984. “The Electric Utility Price Squeezeas an Antitrust Cause of Action.” UCLA Law Review. 31: 563Google Scholar

MacAvoy, Paul W., Daniel, F. Spulber & Stangle, Bruce. 1989. “Is Competitive Entry Free? Bypass and Partial Deregulation in Natural Gas Markets.” Yale Journal on Regulation. 6: 209Google Scholar

Macey, Jonathan R. 1986. “Promoting Public-Regarding Legislation Through Statutory Interpretation: An Interest Group Model.” Columbia Law Review. 86: 223CrossRef Google Scholar

Macey, Jonathan R. 1998. “Public Choice and the Law.” in Newman, Peter, ed. The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics and the LawLondon: United Kingdom: Macmillan Reference LimitedCrossRef Google Scholar

Macleod, W. Bentley. 1996. “Decision, Contract, and Emotion: Some Economics for a Complex and Confusing World.” Canadian Journal of Economics. 29: 788CrossRef Google Scholar

Macneil, Ian R. 1978. “Contracts: Adjustment of Long-term Economic Relations Under Classical, Neo-Classical, and Relational Contract Law.” Northwestern University Law Review. 72: 854Google Scholar

Mahoney, Paul G. & Sanchirico, Chris William. 2003. “Norms, Repeated Games and the Role of Law.” California Law Review. 91: 1281CrossRef Google Scholar

Malloy, Michael. 1998. “When You Wish Upon a Winstar: Contract Analysis and the Future of Regulatory Action.” Saint Louis University Law Journal. 42: 409Google Scholar

Markell, David L. 2000. “The Role of Deterrence-Based Enforcement in a ‘Reinvented’ State/Federal Relationship: The Divide Between Theory and Reality.” Harvard Environmental Law Review. 24:1

Martimort, David, Phillip De Donder & Etienne Billette de Villemeur. 2003. “An Incomplete Contract Perspective on Public Good Provision.”Toulouse Institut d'Economie Industrielle Working Paper, available at http://www.idei.fr/doc/wp/2003/public_good_provision.pdf

Martin, Robert B. III. 2003. “Sherman Shorts Outs:The Dimming of Antitrust Enforcement in the California Electricity Crisis.” Hastings Law Journal. 55: 271Google Scholar

Mashaw, Jerry. 1997. Greed, Chaos& Governance: Using Public Choice to Improve Public Law. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University PressGoogle Scholar

Maskin, Eric & Tirole, Jean. 1999. “Unforeseen Contingencies and Incomplete Contracts.” Review of Economic Studies. 66: 83CrossRef Google Scholar

McArthur, John Burritt. 1997. “Anti-Trust in the New[De]Regulated Natural Gas Industry.” Energy Law Journal. 18: 1Google Scholar

McGreal, Paul E. 1995. “Some Rice with Your Chevron?: Presumption and Deference in Regulatory Preemption.” Case Western Reserve Law Review. 45: 823Google Scholar

McGreal, Paul E. 1998. “The Flawed Economics of the Dormant Commerce Clause.” William & Mary Law Review. 39: 1191Google Scholar

McNollgast, . 1992. “Positive Canons: The Role of Legislative Bargains in Statutory Interpretation.” Georgetown Law Journal. 80: 705Google Scholar

McUsic, Molly S. 1996. “The Ghost of Lochner: Modern Takings Doctrine and Its Impact on Economic Legislation.” Boston University Law Review. 76: 605Google Scholar

Merrill, Thomas W. 1999. “Supplier of Last Resort: Who, What, Why?” Public Utilities Fortnightly. July 15: 18Google Scholar

Merrill, Thomas W. & Henry, E. Smith. 2002. “The Property/Contract Interface.” Columbia Law Review. 101: 773CrossRef Google Scholar

Michaels, Robert J. 1996. “Stranded Investments, Stranded Intellectuals.” Regulation. 47: 51Google Scholar

Michelman, Frank. 1968. “Property, Utility, and Fairness: Comments on the Ethical Foundations of ‘Just Compensation’ Law.” Harvard Law Review. 80: 1165CrossRef Google Scholar

Michelman, Frank. 1988. “Takings 1987.” Columbia Law Review. 88: 1600CrossRef Google Scholar

Mishkin, Paul J. 1957. “The Variousness of ‘Federal Law’: Competence and Discretion in the Choice of National and State Rules for Decision.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review. 105: 797CrossRef Google Scholar

Mitnick, Barry M. 1980. The Political Economy of Regulation: Creating, Designing, and Removing Regulatory Forms. New York: Columbia University PressGoogle Scholar

Movsesian, Mark. 1998. “Are Statutes Really ‘Legislative Bargains?’ The Failure of the Contract Analogy in Statutory Interpretation.” North Carolina Law Review. 76: 1145Google Scholar

Mueller, Milton J. Jr. 1997. Universal Service: Competition, Interconnection, and Monopoly in the Making of the American Telephone SystemWashington, D.C.: American Enterprise InstituteGoogle Scholar

Nagle, John Copeland. 1995. “Waiving Sovereign Immunity inan Age of Clear Statement Rules.” Wisconsin Law Review. 1995: 771Google Scholar

Nelson, Caleb. 2000. “Preemption.” Virginia Law Review. 86: 225CrossRef Google Scholar

Noam, Eli. 1997. “Will Universal Service and Common Carriage Survive the Telecommunications Act of 1996?” Columbia Law Review. 97: 955CrossRef Google Scholar

Noll, Roger. 1971. Reforming Regulation: Studies in the Regulation of Economic Activity. Washington, D.C.: BrookingsGoogle Scholar

Norlander, Gerald A. 1998. “Retail Choice: A Race tothe Bottom.” Public Utilities Fortnightly. Jan.1: 8 (letter to the editor)

North, Douglass C. 1996. “Epilogue: Economic Performance Through Time.” in Alston, Lee J., Eggertsson, Thráinn & Douglas, C. North, eds. Empirical Studies in Institutional Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRef Google Scholar

Norton, Floyd & Spivak, Mark. 1985. “The Wholesale Service Obligation of Electric Utilities.” Energy Law Journal. 6: 179Google Scholar

Note. 1923. “The Sherman Act as Applied to Railroads Regulated Under the Interstate Commerce Act.” Harvard Law Review. 36: 456CrossRef

Note. 1953. “Recent Cases: Antitrust –Primary Jurisdiction Applied in Action Against Members of Regulated Industries.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review. 101: 678

Pace, Joe D. 1987. “Wheeling and the Obligation to Serve.” Energy Law Journal. 8: 265Google Scholar

Page, William H. 1981. “Antitrust, Federalism and the Regulatory Process.” Boston University Law Review. 61: 1099Google Scholar

Page, William H. 1987. “Interest Groups, Antitrust, and State Regulation: Parker v. Brown in the Economic Theory of Legislation.” Duke Law Journal. 1987: 618CrossRef Google Scholar

Page, William H. & John, E. Lopatka. 1993. “State Regulation in the Shadow of Antitrust: FTC v. Ticor Title Insurance Co.” Supreme Court Economic Review. 3: 189CrossRef Google Scholar

Pechman, Carl. 1993. Regulating Power: The Economics of Electricity in the Information Age. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic PressCrossRef Google Scholar

Peltzman, Sam. 1976. “Toward a More General Theory of Regulation.” Journal of Law and Economics. 19: 211CrossRef Google Scholar

Peltzman, Sam. 1989. “The Economic Theory of Regulationafter a Decade of Deregulation.” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity: Microeconomics. 1989: 1CrossRef Google Scholar

Percival, Robert V. 1995. “Environmental Federalism:Historical Roots and Contemporary Models.” Maryland Law Review. 54: 1141Google Scholar

Persson, Torsten, Roland, Gerard & Tabellini, Guido. 1997. “Separation of Powers and Political Accountability.” Quarterly Journal of Economics. 112: 1163CrossRef Google Scholar

Peterson, Andrea. 1989. “The Takings Clause: InSearch of Underlying Principles. Part I – A Critique of Current Takings Clause Doctrine.” California Law Review. 77: 1299CrossRef Google Scholar

Peterson, H. Craig. 1975. “An Empirical Test of Regulatory Effects.” Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science. 6: 111CrossRef Google Scholar

Phillips, Charles F. 1993. The Regulation of Public Utilities. Fairfax, Virginia: Public Utility ReportsGoogle Scholar

Picker, Randal C. 2002. “Understanding Statutory Bundles: Does the Sherman Act Come with the 1996 Telecommunications Act?”University of Chicago John M. Olin Program in Law & Economics, Working Paper No. 177, 2002. Available at http://www.law.uchicago.edu/Picker/Papers/Manhattan200.pdf

Pierce, Richard J. Jr. 1984. “Regulatory Treatment of Mistakes in Retrospect: Cancelled Plants and Excess Capacity.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review. 132: 497CrossRef Google Scholar

Pierce, Richard J. Jr. 1988. “Reconstituting the Natural Gas Industry from Wellhead to Burnertip.” Energy Law Journal. 9: 1Google Scholar

Pierce, Richard J. Jr. 1989. “Public Utility Regulatory Takings: Should the Judiciary Attempt to Police the Political Institutions?” Georgetown Law Journal. 77: 2031Google Scholar

Pierce, Richard J. Jr. 1991. “The Unintended Effects of Judicial Review of Agency Rules: How Federal Courts Have Contributed to the Electricity Crisis of the 1990s.” Administrative Law Review. 43: 7Google Scholar

Pierce, Richard J. Jr. 1994. “The State of the Transition to Competitive Markets in Natural Gas and Electricity.” Energy Law Journal. 15: 323Google Scholar

Piraino, Thomas A. Jr. 1997. “A Proposed Antitrust Analysisof Telecommunications Joint Ventures.” Wisconsin Law Review. 1997: 639Google Scholar

Pitofsky, Robert. 1997. “Competition Policy in Communications Industries: New Antitrust Approaches.” Remarks presented at Glasser Legal Works Seminar on Competitive Policy in Communications Industries: New Antitrust Approach es, Federal Trade Commission, Washington, D.C., March 10. Available at http://www.ftc.gov/speeches/pitofsky/newcomm.htm

Platt, Harold. 1991. The Electric City: Energy and the Growth of the Chicago Area 880–1930Chicago: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar

Pleatt, George R. 1998. “Should Metering Stay at the Stand-Alone Disco?” Public Utilities Fortnightly. Feb. 1Google Scholar

Poirier, Marc R. 2002. “The Virtue of Vagueness in Takings Doctrine.” Cardozo Law Review. 24: 93Google Scholar

Posner, Eric. 1995. “Contract Law in the Welfare State: A Defense of the Unconscionability Doctrine, Usury Laws, and Related Limits on the Freedom to Contract.” Journal of Legal Studies. 24: 283CrossRef Google Scholar

Posner, Eric. 2003. “Economic Analysis of Contract Law after Three Decades: Success or Failure?” Yale Law Journal. 112: 829CrossRef Google Scholar

Posner, Richard A. 1974. “Theories of Economic Regulation.” Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science. 5: 335CrossRef Google Scholar

Posner, Richard A. 1979. “The Chicago School of Antitrust Analysis.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review. 127: 925CrossRef Google Scholar

Posner, Richard & Rosenfield, Andrew. 1977. “Impossibility and Related Doctrines in Contract Law: An Economic Analysis.” Journal of Legal Studies. 6: 83CrossRef Google Scholar

Priest, George. 1992. “The Origins of Utility Regulation and the ‘Theories of Regulation’ Debate.” Journal of Law &Economics. 36: 289CrossRef Google Scholar

Quirk, Paul J. 1981. Industry Influence in Federal Regulatory Agencies. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University PressCrossRef Google Scholar

Robinson, Gustavus H. 1928. “The Public Utility Concept in American Law.” Harvard Law Review. 41: 277CrossRef Google Scholar

Rockefeller John, D. IV. 1991. “A Call for Action:The Pepper Commission's Blueprint for Health Care Reform.” Journal of the American Medical Association. 265: 2507Google Scholar

Rodden, Jonathan & Rose-Ackerman, Susan. 1997. “Does Federalism Preserve Markets?” Virginia Law Review. 83: 1521CrossRef Google Scholar

Rose-Ackerman, Susan. 1980. “Risk Taking and Reelection: Does Federalism Promote Innovation?” Journal of Legal Studies. 9: 593CrossRef Google Scholar

Rose-Ackerman, Susan. 1988. “Against AdHocery: A Comment on Michelman.” Columbia Law Review. 88: 1697CrossRef Google Scholar

Rose-Ackerman, Susan. 1992. “Regulatory Takings: Policy Analysis and Democratic Principles.” in Merucro, Nicholas, ed. Taking Property and Just Compensation: Law and Economic Perspectives of the Takings IssueDordrecht: Kluwer Academic PressCrossRef Google Scholar

Rose-Ackerman, Susan & Rossi, Jim. 2000. “Disentangling Deregulatory Takings.” Virginia Law Review. 86: 1435CrossRef Google Scholar

Rossi, Jim. 1994. “Redeeming Judicial Review: The Hard Look Doctrine and Federal Regulatory Efforts to Restructure the Electric Utility Industry.” Wisconsin Law Review. 1994: 763Google Scholar

Rossi, Jim. 1997. “Participation Run Amok: The Costsof Mass Participation for Deliberative Agency Decisionmaking.” Northwestern University Law Review. 92: 173Google Scholar

Rossi, Jim. 1998a. “The Common Law ‘Duty to Serve’ and Protection of Consumers in an Age of Competitive Retail Public Utility Restructuring.” Vanderbilt Law Review 51: 1233Google Scholar

Rossi, Jim. 1998b. “The Irony of Deregulatory Takings.” Texas Law Review. 77: 297Google Scholar

Rossi, Jim. 2002. “The Electric Power Deregulation Fiasco: Looking to Regulatory Federalism to Promote a Balance Between Markets and the Provision of Public Goods.” Michigan Law Review. 100: 1768CrossRef Google Scholar

Rossi, Jim. 2003. “Lowering the Filed Tariff Shield:Judicial Enforcement for a Deregulatory Era.” Vanderbilt Law Review. 56: 1591Google Scholar

Rossi, Jim. 2004. “Debilitating Doctrine: How the Filed Rate Policy Wreaks Havoc – And What Courts Can Do About It.” Public Utilities Fortnightly, November: 16Google Scholar

Rossi, Jim. Forthcoming 2005. “Dual Constitutions and Constitutional Duels.” William & Mary Law Review.

Rouse, Michael A. 1990. “A Re-Evaluation of the “Filed Rate” Doctrine in Light of Revised Regulatory Policy and Carriers'Practices: INF, Ltd. v. Spectro Alloys Corp.” Creighton Law Review. 23: 669Google Scholar

Rubin, Edward L. & Feeley, Malcolm. 1994. “Federalism: Some Notes on a National Neurosis.” UCLA Law Review. 41: 903Google Scholar

Rubin, Paul H., Curran, Christopher & Curran, John. 2001. “Litigation versus Legislation: Forum Shopping by Rent-Seekers.” Public Choice. 107: 295CrossRef Google Scholar

Ruhl, J. B. & Salzman, James. 2003. “Regulatory Accretion in the Administrative State. Georgetown Law Journal. 91: 75Google Scholar

Santa, Donald F. Jr. 2000. “Who Needs What, and Why?Reporting and Disclosure Obligations in Emerging Competitive Electricity Markets.” Energy Law Journal. 21: 1Google Scholar

Savage, Leonard J. 1972. The Foundations of StatisticsNew York: Dover PublicationsGoogle Scholar

Schelling, Thomas. 1980. Strategy of Conflict, Second edition. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar

Schwartz, Jeffrey D. 1999. “The Use of Antitrust State Action Doctrine in the Deregulated Electric Utility Industry.” American University Law Review. 48: 1449Google Scholar

Schwartz, Joshua I. 1997. “Assembling Winstar: Triumpth of the Ideal of Congruence in Government Contracts Law?” Public Contract Law Journal. 26: 481Google Scholar

Seidenfeld, Mark. 2004. “Pyrrhic Political Penalties: Why the Public Would Lose Under the ‘Penalty Default Canon.’” George Washington Law Review. 72: 724Google Scholar

Shepsle, Kenneth A. 1992. “Congress is a ‘They,’ Not an ‘It’: Legislative Intent as an Oxymoron.” International Review of Law &Economics. 12: 239CrossRef Google Scholar

Sidak, J. Gregory & Spulber, Daniel. 1997. Deregulatory Takings and the Regulatory Contract: The Transformation of Network Industries in the United States. New York: Cambridge University PressCrossRef Google Scholar

Sillin, John O. 2003. “Why We Fell into the Heart of Darkness.” Public Utilities Fortnightly September 15: 30Google Scholar

Silverstein, Eileen. 1991. “Against Preemption in Labor Law.” Connecticut Law Review. 24: 1Google Scholar

Simon, Herbert. 1961. Administrative Behavior, Second edition. New York: MacmillanGoogle Scholar

Simons, Kenneth W. 2002. “Reflections on Assumption of the Risk.” UCLA Law Review. 50: 481Google Scholar

Simpson, James B. & Sarah, D. Strum. 1991. “How a Good Samaritan? Federal Income Tax Exemption for Charitable Hospitals Reconsidered.” University of Puget Sound Law Review. 14: 633Google Scholar

Singer, Joseph. 1996. “No Right to Exclude: Public Accommodations and Private Property.” Northwestern University Law Review. 90: 1283Google Scholar

Smith, Vernon. 1993. “Can Electric Power – A ‘Natural Monopoly’ – Be Deregulated?” in Landsberg, Hans H., ed. Making National Energy PolicyWashington, D.C.: Resources for the FutureGoogle Scholar

Sosnov, Leonard N. 2000. “Separation of Powers Shell Game: The Federal Witness Immunity Act.” Temple Law Review. 73: 171Google Scholar

Spann, Robert M. 1974. “Rate of Return Regulation and Efficiency in Production: An Empirical Test of the Averch-Johnson Thesis.” Bell Journal of Economic and Management Science. 5: 38CrossRef Google Scholar

Speidel, Richard. 1981. “Court-Imposed Price Adjustments Under Long-Term Supply Contracts.” Northwestern University Law Review. 76: 369, 381–94Google Scholar

Spence, David B. & Murray, Paula. 1999. “The Law, Economics, and Politics of Federal Preemption Analysis: A Quantitative Analysis.” California Law Review. 87: 1125CrossRef Google Scholar

Spitzer, Matthew. 1988. “Antitrust, Federalism, and the Rational Choice Political Economy: A Critique of Capture Theory.” Southern California Law Review. 61: 1293Google Scholar

Spulber, Daniel F. & Christopher, S. Yoo. 2003. Access to Networks: Constitutional and Economic Connections. Cornell Law Review. 88: 885Google Scholar

Stearns, Maxell L. 2003. “A Beautiful Mend: A Game Theoretical Analysis of the Dormant Commerce Clause Doctrine.” William & Mary Law Review. 45: 1Google Scholar

Stewart, Richard B. 1990. “Madison'sNightmare.” University of Chicago Law Review. 57: 335CrossRef Google Scholar

Stigler, George. 1971. “The Theory of Economic Regulation.” Bell Journal of Economic and Management Science. 2: 3CrossRef Google Scholar

Stigler, George & Friedland, Claire. 1962. “What Can Regulators Regulate? The Case of Electricity.” Journal of Law &Economics. 5: 1CrossRef Google Scholar

Sugden, Robert. 1995. “A Theory of Focal Points.” Economic Journal. 105: 533CrossRef Google Scholar

Sullivan, Lawrence A. 1992. “Section 2 of the Sherman Act and Vertical Strategies by Dominant Firms.” Southwestern University Law Review. 21: 1227Google Scholar

Sunstein, Cass. 1989. “Interpreting Statutes in the Regulatory State.” Harvard Law Review. 103: 405CrossRef Google Scholar

Sunstein, Cass. 1995. “Incompletely The orized Agreements.” Harvard Law Review. 108: 1733CrossRef Google Scholar

Symposium, . 2003. “Is There an Ideal Way to Deal with the Non-Ideal World of Legal Change?” Journal of Contemporary Legal Issues. 13: 1Google Scholar

Talley, Eric. 2001. “Disclosure Norms.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review. 149: 1955CrossRef Google Scholar

Tirole, Jean. 2002. The Theory of Industrial Organization. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT PressGoogle Scholar

Tomain, Joseph P. & Shapiro, Sidney. 1997. “Analyzing Government Regulation.” Administrative Law Review. 39: 377Google Scholar

U.S. Energy Information Administration. 1997. Electricity Prices in a Competitive Environment: Marginal Cost Pricing of Generation Services and Financial Status of Electric Utilities – A Preliminary Analysis Through 2015. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Energy

Alstine, Michael P. 2002. “The Costs of Legal Change.” UCLA Law Review. 49: 789Google Scholar

Doren, Peter & Taylor, Jerry. 2004. “Rethinking Restructuring.” Public Utilities Fortnightly. February: 12Google Scholar

Mehren, Robert B. 1954. “The Antitrust Laws and Regulated Industries: The Doctrine of Primary Jurisdiction.” Harvard Law Review. 67: 929CrossRef Google Scholar

Watts, Duncan J. 2003. Six Degreesof Separation: The Science of a Connected Age. New York: W.W. Norton& CoGoogle Scholar

Weaver, Jacqueline. 2004. “Can Energy Markets BeTrusted?” Houston Business and Tax Law Journal. 4: 1Google Scholar

Weiser, Philip J. 1999. “Chevron, Cooperative Federalism, and Tele communications Reform.” Vanderbilt Law Review. 52: 1Google Scholar

Weiser, Philip J. 2001a. “Federal Common Law, Cooperative Federalism, and the Enforcement of the Telcom Act.” New York University Law Review. 76: 1692Google Scholar

Weiser, Philip J. 2001b. “Towards a Constitutional Architecture for Cooperative Federalism.” North Carolina Law Review. 79: 663Google Scholar

Weiser, Philip J. 2003. “Goldwasser, The Telecom Act, and Reflections on Antitrust Remedies.” Administrative Law Review. 55: 1Google Scholar

White, Matthew W. 1996. “Power Struggles: Explaining Deregulatory Reforms in Electricity Markets.” Brookings Papers: Microeconomics. 1996: 201CrossRef Google Scholar

Wiley, John Shepard Jr. 1986. “A Capture Theory of Antitrust Federalism.” Harvard Law Review. 99: 713CrossRef Google Scholar

Williamson, Oliver. 1975. Marketsand Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust ImplicationsNew York: Free PressGoogle Scholar

Williamson, Oliver. 1976. “Franchise Bidding for Natural Monopolies – In General and with Respect to CATV.”Bell Journal of Economics. 7: 73CrossRef

Williamson, Oliver. 1979. “Transaction Cost Economics: The Governance of Contractual Relations.” Journal of Law & Economics. 22: 233CrossRef Google Scholar

Williamson, Oliver. 1996a. The Mechanisms of GovernanceNew York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Williamson, Oliver. 1996b. “Response: Deregulatory Takings and the Breach of the Regulatory Contract: Some Precautions.” New York University Law Review. 71: 1007Google Scholar

Wright, Ronald. 1996. “When Do We Want Incomplete Agreements: A Comment on Sunstein's Holmes Devise Lecture.” Wake Forest Law Review. 31: 459Google Scholar

Wyman, Bruce. 1903. “The Law of the Public Callings as aSolution of the Trust Problem.” Harvard Law Review. 17: 156, 161CrossRef Google Scholar

Young, Ernest A. 1999. “Preemption at Sea.” George Washington Law Review. 67: 273Google Scholar

Yoo, John C. 1998. “Sounds of Sovereignty: Defining Federalism in the 1990s.” Indiana Law Review. 32: 27Google Scholar

Zajac, Edward E. 1995. The Political Economy of Fairness. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.Google Scholar