Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m8s7h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T19:21:31.604Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Getting obstructions out of the driver's view: NHTSA's field of direct view regulations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 October 2009

Thomas O. McGarity
Affiliation:
University of Texas, Austin
Get access

Summary

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) was created in the mid-1960s after Ralph Nader convinced the nation that traffic safety depended as much upon the “nut on the wheel” as the “nut behind the wheel.” Although state highway safety agencies are responsible for ensuring visual acuity for the human half of the man-machine combination, NHTSA must ensure that the machine half does not unnecessarily obstruct the driver's view of the road and of approaching hazards. The long-studied, but never implemented “Field of Direct View” (FDV) standard was NHTSA's attempt to establish requirements for a minimum field of view for the driver, for light transmittance through windshields, and for the permissible size of obstructions (e.g. roof pillars and rear-view mirrors) in the driver's field of view.

Regulatory background

Shortly after its creation, a NHTSA contractor reported that automobile rear-view mirrors were a major obstruction to driver vision and that roof pillars in both the front and the rear of some automobiles created substantial “blind spots.” The agency also became concerned that windshield tinting could cause night visibility problems. The agency in April 1972 proposed a standard that would set requirements for: (1) obstructions in the driver's fields of view; (2) light transmittance levels of windshields; (3) visibility of the vehicle's corners; (4) visibility of ground surface targets for trucks, buses, and other such passenger vehicles; and (5) view obstruction by sun visors.

Comments on the proposal were “strong, critical and helpful.” Manufacturers agreed “in principle” with some of the proposals, but they disagreed with the agency and among themselves as to how visibility requirements should be achieved.

Type
Chapter
Information
Reinventing Rationality
The Role of Regulatory Analysis in the Federal Bureaucracy
, pp. 62 - 72
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×