Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T06:56:49.823Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 5 - Surgical Management of Proximal and Distal Tubal Disease

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 November 2018

By
Linnea R. Goodman  and
Jeffrey M. Goldberg
Edited by
Jeffrey M. Goldberg ,
Ceana H. Nezhat  and
Jay Ira Sandlow
Jeffrey M. Goldberg
Affiliation:
Cleveland Clinic
Ceana H. Nezhat
Affiliation:
Nezhat Medical Center, Atlanta
Jay Ira Sandlow
Affiliation:
Medical College of Wisconsin
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Reproductive Surgery
The Society for Reproductive Surgeons' Manual
 , pp. 43 - 49
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Honore, GM, Holden, AE, Schenken, RS. Pathophysiology and management of proximal tubal blockage. Fertil Steril. 1999;5:785–95.Google Scholar
Practice Committee of the American Society of Reproductive Medicine. Optimal evaluation of the infertile female. Fertil Steril. 2006;86:S264–7.Google Scholar
Evers, JL, Land, JA, Mol, BW. Evidence-based medicine for diagnostic questions. Semin Reprod Med. 2003;21:9–15.Google ScholarPubMed
Dessole, S, Meloni, GB, Capobianco, G, Manzoni, MA, Ambrosini, G, Canalis, GC. A second hysterosalpingography reduces the use of selective technique for treatment of a proximal tubal obstruction. Fertil Steril. 2000;73:1037–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mol, BW, Collins, JA, Burrows, EA, van der Veen, F, Bossuyt, PM. Comparison of hysterosalpingography and laparoscopy in predicting fertility outcome. Hum Reprod. 1999;14:1237–42.Google Scholar
Hamed, HO, Shahin, AY, Elsamman, AM. Hysterosalpingo-constrast sonography versus radiographic hysterosalpingography in the evaluation of tubal patency. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2009;105:215–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ahinko-Hakamaa, KM, Huhtala, H, Tinkanen, H. Confirmation of tubal patency in hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography by transvaginal hydrolaparoscopy. Acta Obstet Gynecol. 2009;88:286–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Catenacci, M, Goldberg, JM. Transvaginal hydrolaparoscopy. Semin Reprod Med. 2011;29:95–100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Den Hartog, JE, Morre, SA, Land, JA. Chlamydia trachomatis-associated tubal factor subfertility: immunogenetic aspects and serological screening. Hum Reprod Update. 2006;12:719–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, N, Vanderkerchove, P, Lilford, R, et al. Tubal flushing for subfertility. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009; undefined: pp. CD003718.Google Scholar
Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. Clinic summary report. Available at: www.sartcorsonline.com/rptCSR_PublicMultYear.aspx?ClinicPKID=0. Accessed September 15, 2015.Google Scholar
Chu, J, Harb, HM, Gallos, ID, et al. Salpingostomy in the treatment of hydrosalpinx: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod. 2015;30:1882–95.Google Scholar
Hansen, M, Bower, C, Milne, E, de Klerk, N, Kurinczuk, J. Assisted reproductive technologies and the risk of birth defects – a systematic review. Hum Reprod. 2005;20:328–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jackson, RA, Gibson, KA, Wu, YW, Croughan, MS. Perinatal outcomes in singletons following in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;103:551–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
El-Chaar, D, Yang, Q, Gao, J, et al. Risk of birth defects increased in pregnancies conceived by assisted human reproduction. Fertil Steril. 2009;92:1557–61.Google Scholar
Letterie, GS, Sakas, EL. Histology of proximal tubal obstruction in cases of unsuccessful tubal canalization. Fertil Steril. 1991;56:831–5.Google Scholar
Pinto, AB, Hovsepian, DM, Wattanakumtornkul, S, Pilgram, TK. Pregnancy outcomes after fallopian tube recanalization: oil-based versus water-soluble contrast agents. J Vasc Interven Radiol. 2003;14:69–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Role of tubal surgery in the era of assisted reproductive technology: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2015;103:e37–43.Google Scholar
The American Fertility Society classifications of adnexal adhesions, distal tubal occlusion, tubal occlusion secondary to tubal ligation, tubal pregnancies, Mullerian anomalies and intrauterine adhesions. Fertil Steril. 1988;9:944–55.Google Scholar
Dun, EC, Nezhat, CH. Tubal factor infertility: diagnosis and management in the era of assisted reproductive technology. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2012;39:551–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bontis, JN, Theodoridis, TD. Laparoscopic management of hydrosalpinx. Ann NY Acad Sci. 2006;092:199–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nackley, AC, Muasher, SJ. The significance of hydrosalpinx in in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 1998;69:373–84.Google Scholar
Milingos, SD, Kallipolitis, GK, Loutradis, DC, et al. Laparoscopic treatment of hydrosalpinx: factors affecting pregnancy rates. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2000;7:355–61.Google Scholar
Zeyneloglu, HB, Arici, A, Olive, D. Adverse effects of hydrosalpinx on pregnancy rates after in vitro fertilization – embryo transfer. Fertil Steril. 1998;70:492–9.Google Scholar
Camus, E, Poncelet, C, Goffinet, F, et al. Pregnancy rates after in-vitro fertilization in cases of tubal infertility with and without hydrosalpinx: a meta-analysis of published comparative studies. Hum Reprod. 1999;14:1243–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine in collaboration with The Society of Reproductive Surgeons. Salpingectomy for hydrosalpinx prior to in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2008;90:S66–8.Google Scholar
Johnson, N, van Voorst, S, Sowter, MC, Strandell, A, Mol, BW. Surgical treatment for tubal disease in women due to undergo in vitro fertilisation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;CD002125.Google Scholar
Kassabji, M, Sims, JA, Butlerb, L, Muasher, SJ. Reduced pregnancy outcome in patients with unilateral or bilateral hydrosalpinx after in vitro fertilization. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1994;56:129–32.Google Scholar
Murray, DL, Sagoskin, AW, Widra, EA. The adverse effect of hydrosalpinges on in vitro fertilization pregnancy rates and the benefit of surgical correction. Fertil Steril. 1998;69:41–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shelton, KE, Butler, L, Toner, JP, Oehninger, S, Muasher, SJ. Salpingectomy improves the pregnancy rate in in-vitro fertilization patients with hydrosalpinx. Hum Reprod. 1996;11:523–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chan, CC, Ng, EH, Li, CF, Ho, PC. Impaired ovarian blood flow and reduced antral follicle count following laparoscopic salpingectomy for ectopic pregnancy. Hum Reprod. 2003;18:2175–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dar, P, Sachs, GS, Strassburger, D, Bukovsky, I, Arieli, S. Ovarian function before and after salpingectomy in artificial reproductive technology patients. Hum Reprod. 2000;15:142–4.Google Scholar
Strandell, A, Lindhard, A, Waldenstrom, U, Thorburn, J. Prophylactic salpingectomy does not impair the ovarian response in IVF treatment. Hum Reprod. 2001;16:1135–9.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×