Book contents
- Research and Theory on Workplace Aggression
- Research and Theory on Workplace Aggression
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Tables and figures
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- Part I The Measurement, Predictors, and Consequences of Workplace Aggression
- Part II The Social Context of Workplace Aggression
- Part III The Prevention of Workplace Aggression
- 11 Coping with Workplace Aggression
- 12 Prospects for Reducing Aggressive Behavior and Other Forms of Counterproductive Work Behavior via Personnel Selection
- 13 Combating Workplace Aggression via Organizational Interventions
- 14 Moving the Field of Workplace Aggression Forward
- Index
- References
14 - Moving the Field of Workplace Aggression Forward
Thoughts and Recommendations
from Part III - The Prevention of Workplace Aggression
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 March 2017
Book contents
- Research and Theory on Workplace Aggression
- Research and Theory on Workplace Aggression
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Tables and figures
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- Part I The Measurement, Predictors, and Consequences of Workplace Aggression
- Part II The Social Context of Workplace Aggression
- Part III The Prevention of Workplace Aggression
- 11 Coping with Workplace Aggression
- 12 Prospects for Reducing Aggressive Behavior and Other Forms of Counterproductive Work Behavior via Personnel Selection
- 13 Combating Workplace Aggression via Organizational Interventions
- 14 Moving the Field of Workplace Aggression Forward
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Research and Theory on Workplace Aggression , pp. 350 - 370Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Andersson, L. M., & Pearson, C. M. (1999). Tit for tat? The spiraling effect of incivility in the workplace. Academy of Management Review, 24, 452–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aquino, K., Grover, S. L., Goldman, B., & Folger, R. (2003). When push doesn’t come to shove: Interpersonal forgiveness in workplace relationships. Journal of Management Inquiry, 12, 209–216.Google Scholar
Aquino, K., & Thau, S. (2009). Workplace victimization: Aggression from the target’s perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 717–741.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aquino, K., Tripp, T. M., & Bies, R. J. (2006). Getting even or moving on? Power, procedural, justice, and types of offense as predictors of revenge, forgiveness, reconciliation, and avoidance in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 653–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barling, J., Rogers, G. A., & Kelloway, K. E. (2001). Behind closed doors: In-home workers’ experience of sexual harassment and workplace violence. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 6, 255–269.Google Scholar
Beattie, L., & Griffin, B. (2014). Day-level fluctuations in stress and engagement in response to workplace incivility: A diary study. Work and Stress, 28, 124–142.Google Scholar
Bjorkqvist, K., Osterman, K., & Lagerspetz, K. M. J. (1994). Sex differences in covert aggression among adults. Aggressive Behavior, 20, 27–33.Google Scholar
Bowling, N. A., & Beehr, T. A. (2006). Workplace harassment from the victim’s perspective: A theoretical model and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 998–1012.Google Scholar
Bowling, N. A., Camus, K. A., & Blackmore, C. E. (2015). Conceptualizing and measuring workplace abuse: Implications for the study of abuse’s predictors and consequences. In Mistreatment in organizations (pp. 225–263). New York: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
Bunk, J. A., Karabin, J., & Lear, T. (2011). Understanding why workers engage in rude behaviors: A social interactionist perspective. Current Psychology, 30, 74–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cortina, L. M. (2008). Unseen injustice: Incivility as modern discrimination in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 33, 55–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cortina, L. M., Magley, V. J., Williams, J. H., & Langhout, R. D. (2001). Incivility in the workplace: Incidence and impact. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 6, 64–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duffy, M. K., Ganster, D. C., & Pagon, M. (2002). Social undermining in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 331–351.Google Scholar
Edwards, J.R. (2011). The fallacy of formative measurement. Organizational Research Methods, 14, 370–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferris, D. L., Brown, D. J., Berry, J. W., & Lian, H. (2008). The development and validation of the Workplace Ostracism Scale. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 1348–1366.Google Scholar
Fisher, C. D., & To, M. L. (2012). Using experience sampling methodology in organizational behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33, 865–877.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzgerald, L. F., Drasgow, F., Hulin, C. L., Gelfand, M. J., & Magley, V. J. (1997). The antecedents and consequences of sexual harassment in organizations: A test of an integrated model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 578–589.Google Scholar
Gallus, J. A., Bunk, J. A., Mathews, R. A., Barnes-Farrell, J. L., & Magley, V. J. (2014). An eye for an eye? Exploring the relationship between workplace incivility experiences and perpetration. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 19, 143–154.Google Scholar
Gephart, Jr., R. P. (2013). Doing research with words: Qualitative methodologies and industrial/organizational psychology. In Cortina, J. M. & Landis, R. S. (Eds.), Modern research methods for the study of behavior in organizations (pp. 265–317). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ghosh, R., Dierkes, S., & Falletta, S. (2011). Incivility spiral in mentoring relationships: Re-conceptualizing negative mentoring as deviant workplace behavior. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 13, 22–39.Google Scholar
Giumetti, G. W., Hartfield, A. L., Scisco, J. L., Schroeder, A. N., Muth, E. R., & Kowalski, R. M. (2013). What a rude e-mail! Examining the differential effects of incivility versus support on mood, energy, engagement, and performance in an online context. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 18, 297–309.Google Scholar
Grembowski, D. (2001). The practice of health program evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hershcovis, M. S. (2011). “Incivility, social undermining, bullying ... oh my!”: A call to reconcile constructs within workplace aggression research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32, 499–519.Google Scholar
Hershcovis, M. S., & Reich, T. C. (2013). Integrating workplace aggression research: Relational, contextual, and method considerations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34, S26–S42.Google Scholar
Hinkin, T. R. (1995). A review of scale development practices in the study of organizations. Journal of Management, 21, 967–988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinkin, T. R. (1998). A brief tutorial on the development of measures for use in survey questionnaires. Organizational Research Methods, 1, 104–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kath, L. M., Swody, C. A., Magely, V. J., Bunk, J. A., & Gallus, J. (2009). Workgroup climate for sexual harassment as a moderator of the relationship between individuals’ experiences of sexual harassment and job-related outcomes. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 82, 159–182.Google Scholar
Leiter, M. P., Day, A., Gilin-Oore, D., & Laschinger, H. K. (2012). Getting better and staying better: Assessing civility, incivility, distress, and job attitudes one year after a civility intervention. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 17, 425–435.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leiter, M. P., Laschinger, H. K. S., Day, A., & Gilin-Oore, D. (2011). The impact of civility interventions on employee social behavior, distress, and attitudes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 1258–1274.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Long, E. C., & Christian, M. S. (2015, March 9). Mindfulness buffers retaliatory responses to injustice: A regulatory approach. Journal of Applied Psychology. doi: 10/1037/apl0000019Google Scholar
Meier, L. L., & Spector, P. E. (2013). Reciprocal effects of work stressors and counterproductive work behavior: A five-wave longitudinal study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98, 529–539.Google Scholar
Naylor, J. C., Pritchard, R. D., & Ilgen, D. R. (1980). A theory of behavior in organizations. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Ones, D. S., & Viswesvaran, C. (1996). Bandwidth-fidelity dilemma in personality measurement for personnel selection. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17, 609–626.3.0.CO;2-K>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osatuke, K., Mohr, D., Ward, C., Moore, S. C., Dyrenforth, S., & Belton, L. (2009). Civility, respect, engagement in the workforce (CREW): Nationwide organization development intervention at Veterans Health Administration. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 45, 384–410.Google Scholar
Podsakoff, N. P., Shen, W., & Podsakoff, P. M. (2006). The role of formative measurement models in strategic management research: Review, critique, and implications for future research. Research Methodology in Strategy and Management, 3, 197–252.Google Scholar
Reich, T. C., & Hershcovis, M. S. (2015). Observing workplace incivility. Journal of Applied Psychology, 199, 203–215.Google Scholar
Schneider, B., Ehrhart, M.G., & Macey, W.H. (2011). Perspectives on organizational climate and culture. In Zedeck, S. (Ed.), APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 373–414). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Spector, P. E., & Fox, S. (2005). A model of counterproductive work behavior. In Fox, S. & Spector, P. E. (Eds.), Counterproductive workplace behavior: Investigations of actors and targets (pp. 151–174). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Taylor, S. G., Bedeian, A. G., Cole, M. S., & Zhang, Z. (2014). Developing and testing a dynamic model of workplace incivility change. Journal of Management. doi: 10.1177/0149206314535432Google Scholar
Tedeschi, J. T., & Felson, R. B. (1994). Violence, aggression, and coercive actions. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Tepper, B. J. (2000). Consequences of abusive supervision. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 178–190.Google Scholar
Timmerman, G., & Bajema, C. (2000). The impact of organizational culture on perceptions and experiences of sexual harassment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 57, 188–205.Google Scholar
Trudel, J., & Reio, Jr., T. G. (2011). Managing workplace incivility: The role of conflict management style – antecedents or antidote? Human Resource Development Quarterly, 22, 395–423.Google Scholar
Uy, M. A., Foo, M. D., & Aguinis, H. (2010). Using experience sampling methodology to advance entrepreneurship theory and research. Organizational Research Methods, 13, 31–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiss, H. M., & Cropanzano, R. (1996). Affective events theory: A theoretical discussion of the structure, causes and consequences of affective experiences at work. In Staw, B. M. & Cummings, L. L. (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior: An annual series of analytical essays and critical reviews (pp. 1–74). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Williams, J. H., Fitzgerald, L. F., & Drasgow, F. (1999). The effects of organizational practices on sexual harassment and individual outcomes in the military. Military Psychology, 11, 303–328.Google Scholar
Wilson, J. Q., & Kelling, G. L. (1982). Broken windows: The police and neighborhood safety. The Atlantic, 249, 29–38.Google Scholar
- 3
- Cited by