Alliger, G. M., & Dwight, S. A. (2000). A meta-analytic investigation of the susceptibility of integrity tests to faking and coaching. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60, 59–72.Google Scholar

Alliger, G. M., Lilienfield, S. O., & Mitchell, K. E. (1996). The susceptibility of overt and covert integrity tests to coaching and faking. Psychological Science, 7, 32–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Becker, T. E. (2005). Development and validation of a situational judgment test of employee integrity. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 13(3), 225–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berry, C. M., Carpenter, N. C., & Barratt, C. L. (2012). Do other-reports of counterproductive work behavior provide an incremental contribution over self-reports? A meta-analytic comparison. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(3), 613–636.Google Scholar

Berry, C. M., Ones, D. S., & Sackett, P. R. (2007). Interpersonal deviance, organizational deviance, and their common correlates: A review and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 410–424.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Berry, C. M., Sackett, P. R., & Tobares, V. (2010). A meta-analysis of conditional reasoning tests of aggression. Personnel Psychology, 63, 361–384.Google Scholar

Berry, C. M., Sackett, P. R., & Wiemann, S. (2007). A review of recent developments in integrity test research. Personnel Psychology, 60, 271–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Birkeland, S. A., Manson, T. M., Kisamore, J. L., Brannick, M. T., & Smith, M. A. (2006). A meta-analytic investigation of job applicant faking on personality measures. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 14, 317–335.Google Scholar

Clevenger, J., Pereira, G. M., Wiechmann, D., Schmitt, N., & Harvey, V. S. (2001). Incremental validity of situational judgment tests. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 410–417.Google Scholar

Conway, J. S. (2014). The invention of lying (at work): The development and validation of a situational judgment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of South Florida, Tampa, FL.Google Scholar

Crick, N. R., & Dodge, K. A. (1994). A review and reformulation of social information-processing mechanisms in children’s social adjustment. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 74–101.Google Scholar

Dalal, R. S. (2005). A meta-analysis of the relationship between organizational citizenship behavior and counterproductive work behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(6), 1241–1255.Google Scholar

de Meijer, L. A., Born, M. P., van Zielst, J., & van der Molen, H. T. (2010). Construct-driven development of a video-based situational judgment test for integrity: A study in a multi-ethnic police setting. European Psychologist, 15(3), 229–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Deffenbacher, J. L., Oetting, E. R., Thwaites, G. A., Lynch, R. S., Baker, D. A., et al. (1996). State-trait anger theory and the utility of the trait anger scale. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 43, 131–148.Google Scholar

Dilchert, S., Ones, D. S., Davis, R. D., & Rostow, C. D. (2007). Cognitive ability predicts objectively measured counterproductive work behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 616–627.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Einarsen, S., & Raknes, B. I. (1997). Harassment in the workplace and the victimization of men. Violence and Victims, 12, 247–263.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Foldes, H. J., Duehr, E. E., & Ones, D. S. (2008). Group differences in personality: Meta-analyses comparing five US racial groups. Personnel Psychology, 61, 579–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Glomb, T. M. (2002). Workplace anger and aggression: Informing conceptual models with data from specific encounters. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 7, 20–36.Google Scholar

Gonzalez-Mule, E., Mount, M. K., & Oh, I.S. (2014). A meta-analysis of the relationship between general mental ability and nontask performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99, 1222–1243.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gottfredson, L. S. (1997). Mainstream science on intelligence: An editorial with 52 signatories, history and bibliography. Intelligence, 24, 79–132.Google Scholar

Gruys, M. L. (2000). The dimensionality of deviant employee behavior in the workplace. Doctoral Dissertation. Retrieved from Proquest Dissertations & Theses.Google Scholar

Hershcovis, M. S., & Barling, J. (2010). Towards a multi-foci approach to workplace aggression: A meta-analytic review of outcomes from different perpetrators. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31, 24–44.Google Scholar

Hershcovis, M. S., Turner, N., Barling, J., Arnold, K. A., Dupre, K. E., et al. (2007). Predicting workplace aggression: A meta- analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 228–238.Google Scholar

Hunter, J. E. (1980). Validity generalization for 12,000 jobs: An application of synthetic validity and validity generalization to the General Aptitude Test Battery (GATE). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor, Employment Service.Google Scholar

Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (2004). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Hurtz, G. M., & Alliger, G. M. (2002). Influence of coaching on integrity test performance and unlikely virtues scale scores. Human Performance, 15, 255–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

James, L. R. (1998). Measurement of personality via conditional reasoning. Organizational Research Methods, 1(2), 131–163.Google Scholar

James, L. R., & LeBreton, J. M. (2012). Assessing the implicit personality through conditional reasoning. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar

James, L. R., & McIntyre, M. D. (2000). Conditional Reasoning Test of Aggression test manual. Knoxville, TN: Innovative Assessment Technology.Google Scholar

James, L. R., McIntyre, M. D., Glisson, C. A., Green, P. D., Patton, T. W., et al. (2005). A conditional reasoning measure for aggression. Organizational Research Methods, 8(1), 69–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marcus, B., Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2007). Personality dimensions explaining relationships between integrity tests and counterproductive behavior: Big five, or one in addition? Personnel Psychology, 60, 1–34.Google Scholar

McCrae, R. R., & CostaJr., P. T. (2003). Personality in adulthood: A five-factor theory perspective. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

McCrae, R. R., (1997). Personality trait structure as a human universal. American Psychologist, 52(5), 509–516.Google Scholar

McDaniel, M. A., Hartman, N. S., Whetzel, D. L., & Grubb, W. L. (2007). Situational judgment tests, response instructions, and validity: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 60(1), 63–91.Google Scholar

Morf, C. C., & Rhodewalt, F. (2001). Unraveling the paradoxes of narcissism: A dynamic self- regulatory processing model. Psychological Inquiry, 12(4), 177–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Neuman, J. H., & Baron, R. A. (2005). Aggression in the workplace: A social–psychological perspective. In Fox, S. & Spector, P. E. (Eds.), Counterproductive Work Behavior: Investigations of actors and targets, (pp. 13–40). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar

Neuman, J. H., (1998). Workplace violence and workplace aggression: Evidence concerning specific forms, potential causes, and preferred targets. Journal of Management, 24, 391–419.Google Scholar

Neuman, J. H., (1996). Aggression in the workplace. In Giacalone, R. A., & Greenberg, J. (Eds.), Antisocial behavior in organizations (pp. 37–67). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Press.Google Scholar

O’Boyle, E. H., Forsyth, D. R., Banks, G. C., & McDaniel, M. A. (2012). A meta-analysis of the dark triad and work behavior: A social exchange perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(3), 557–579.Google Scholar

O’Boyle, E. H., Forsyth, D. R., Banks, G. C., Story, P. A., & White, C. D. (2015). A meta‐ analytic test of redundancy and relative importance of the Dark Triad and Five‐Factor model of personality. Journal of Personality, 83(6), 644–664.Google Scholar

Ones, D. S., & Dilchert, S. (2013). Counterproductive work behaviors: Concepts, measurement, and nomological network. In Geisinger, K. F. (Ed.), APA handbook of testing and assessment in psychology (pp. 643–659). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar

Ones, D. S., Dilchert, S., & Viswesvaran, C. (2012). Cognitive abilities. In Schmitt, N. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of personnel assessment and selection (pp. 179–224). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Ones, D. S., (2001). Integrity tests and other criterion-focused occupational personality scales (COPS) used in personnel selection. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9, 31–39.Google Scholar

Ones, D. S., & Viswesvaran, C. (1998). Gender, age, and race differences on overt integrity tests: Results across four large-scale job applicant datasets. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 35–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ones, D. S., (2001). Integrity tests and other criterion-focused occupational personality scales (COPS) used in personnel selection. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9, 31–39.Google Scholar

Ones, D. S., Viswesvaran, C. & Schmidt, F. L. (1993). Comprehensive meta-analysis of integrity test validities: Findings and implications for personnel selection and theories of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(4), 679–703.Google Scholar

Robinson, S. L., & Bennett, R. J. (1995). A typology of deviant workplace behaviors: A multidimensional scaling study. Academy of Management Journal, 38(2), 555–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rotundo, M., & Sackett, P. R. (2002). The relative importance of task, citizenship, and counterproductive performance to global ratings of job performance: A policy-capturing approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 66–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Sackett, P. R., Burris, L. R., & Callahan, C. (1989). Integrity testing for personnel selection: An update. Personnel Psychology, 42, 491–529.Google Scholar

Sackett, P. R., & DeVore, C. J. (2001). Counterproductive behaviors at work. Handbook of Industrial, Work, and Organizational Psychology, 1, 145–164.Google Scholar

Sackett, P. R., & Schmitt, N. (2012). Reconciling conflicting meta-analytic findings regarding integrity test validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 550–556.Google Scholar

Sackett, P. R., Schmitt, N., Ellingson, J. E., & Kabin, M. B. (2001). High-stakes testing in employment, credentialing, and higher education: Prospects in a post-affirmative action world. American Psychologist, 56, 302–318.Google Scholar

Sackett, P. R., & Walmsley, P. T. (2014). Which personality attributes are most important in the workplace? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(5), 538–551.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Sackett, P. R., Zedeck, S., & Fogli, L. (1988). Relations between measures of typical and maximum job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 482–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1998). The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 124(2), 262–274.Google Scholar

Spector, P. E., & Fox, S. (2005). A model of counterproductive work behavior. In Fox, S. & Spector, P. E. (Eds.), Counterproductive workplace behavior: Investigations of actors and targets (pp. 151–174). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

van der Linden, D., Nijenhuis, J., & Bakker, A. B. (2010). The general factor of personality: A meta-analysis of Big Five intercorrelations and a criterion-related validity study. Journal of Research in Personality, 44(3), 315–327.Google Scholar

Van Iddekinge, C. H., Roth, P. L., Raymark, P. H., & Odle-Dusseau, H. N. (2012). The criterion-related validity of integrity tests: An updated meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 499–530.Google Scholar

Viswesvaran, C., & Ones, D. S. (1999). Meta-analyses of fakability estimates: Implications for personality measurement. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 59, 197–210.Google Scholar

Watson, D., & Clark, L. A. (1984). Negative affectivity: The disposition to experience aversive emotional states. Psychological Bulletin, 96, 465–490.Google Scholar

White, J. L., Moffitt, T. E., & Silva, P. A. (1989). A prospective replication of the protective effects of IQ in subjects at high risk for juvenile delinquency. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 57, 719–724.Google Scholar