Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-jwnkl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-09T05:08:44.849Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Spillover and Crossover of Workplace Aggression

from Part II - The Social Context of Workplace Aggression

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 March 2017

By
Merideth J. Thompson ,
Dawn S. Carlson  and
Jenny M. Hoobler
Edited by
Nathan A. Bowling  and
M. Sandy Hershcovis
Nathan A. Bowling
Affiliation:
Wright State University, Ohio
M. Sandy Hershcovis
Affiliation:
University of Calgary
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Research and Theory on Workplace Aggression , pp. 186 - 220
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aquino, K., Grover, S. L., Bradfield, M., & Allen, D. G. (1999). The effects of negative affectivity, hierarchical status, and self-determination on workplace victimization. Academy of Management Journal, 42(3), 260–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Burke, R. (2009a). Workaholism and relationship quality: A spillover-crossover perspective. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 14(1), 23–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Dollard, M. F. (2008). How job demands affect partners’ experience of exhaustion: Integrating work-family conflict and crossover theory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(4), 901–911.Google Scholar
Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2005). The crossover of burnout and work engagement among working couples. Human Relations, 58(5), 661–689.Google Scholar
Bakker, A. B., Petrou, P., & Tsaousis, I. (2012). Inequity in work and intimate relationships: A spillover–crossover model. Anxiety, Stress & Coping: An International Journal, 25(5), 491–506.Google Scholar
Bakker, A. B., Shimazu, A., Demerouti, E. E., Shimada, K., & Kawakami, N. (2014). Work engagement versus workaholism: A test of the spillover-crossover model. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 29(1), 63–80.Google Scholar
Bakker, A. B., Westman, M., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2007). Crossover of burnout: An experimental design. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 16(2), 220–239.Google Scholar
Bakker, A. B., Westman, M., & van Emmerik, I. (2009b). Advancements in crossover theory. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 24(3), 206–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barling, J., & MacEwen, K. E. (1992). Linking work experiences to facets of marital functioning. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13(6), 573–583.Google Scholar
Barsade, S. G. (2002). The ripple effects: Emotional contagion and its influence on group behavior. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47(4), 644–675.Google Scholar
Bass, B. L., Butler, A. B., Grzywacz, J. G., & Linney, K. D. (2009). Do job demands undermine parenting? A daily analysis of spillover and crossover effects. Family Relations: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Applied Family Studies, 58(2), 201–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baxter, J., Hewitt, B., & Western, M. (2009). Who uses paid domestic labor in Australia? Choice and constraint in hiring household help. Feminist Economics, 15(1): 1–26.Google Scholar
Bazarko, D., Cate, R. A., Azocar, F., & Kreitzer, M. J. (2013). The impact of an innovative mindfulness-based stress reduction program on the health and well-being of nurses employed in a corporate setting. Journal of Workplace Behavioral Health, 28(2), 107–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolger, N., DeLongis, A., Kessler, R., & Wethington, E. (1989). The contagion of stress across multiple roles. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 51, 175–183.Google Scholar
Booth, A., & Crouter, A. C. (Eds.). (2005). The new population problem: Why families in developed countries are shrinking and what it means. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.Google Scholar
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1977). Toward an experimental ecology of human development. American Psychologist, 32(7), 513–531.Google Scholar
Carlson, D. S., Ferguson, M., Kacmar, K. M., Grzywacz, J. G., & Whitten, D. (2011a). Pay it forward: The positive crossover effects of supervisor work-family enrichment. Journal of Management, 37(3), 770–789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlson, D. S., Ferguson, M., Perrewé, P. L., & Whitten, D. (2011b). The fallout from abusive supervision: An examination of subordinates and their partners. Personnel Psychology, 64(4), 937–961.Google Scholar
Carlson, D. S., Kacmar, K. M., Wayne, J. H., & Grzywacz, J. G. (2006). Measuring the positive side of the work-family interface: Development and validation of a work-family enrichment scale. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68, 131–164.Google Scholar
Carlson, D. S., Kacmar, K. M., & Williams, L. J. (2000). The development and validation of a multi-dimensional measure of work-family conflict. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 56, 249–176.Google Scholar
Chan, C. J., & Margolin, G. (1994). The relationship between dual-earner couples’ daily work mood and home affect. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 11(4), 573–586.Google Scholar
Chang, C. H., & Lyons, B. J. (2012). Not all aggressions are created equal: A multifoci approach to workplace aggression. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 17(1), 79–92.Google Scholar
Cinamon, R., Weisel, A., & Tzuk, K. (2007). Work-family conflict within the family: Crossover effects, perceived parent-child interaction quality, parental self-efficacy, and life role attributions. Journal of Career Development, 34(1), 79–100.Google Scholar
Compas, B. E. (1987). Coping with stress during childhood and adolescence. Psychological Bulletin, 101(3), 393–403.Google Scholar
Cowlishaw, S., Evans, L., & McLennan, J. (2010). Work-family conflict and crossover in volunteer emergency service workers. Work & Stress, 24(4), 342–358.Google Scholar
Culbertson, S., Mills, M., & Fullagar, C. (2012). Work engagement and work-family facilitation: Making homes happier through positive affective spillover. Human Relations, 65(9), 1155–1177.Google Scholar
Dasborough, M. T., Ashkanasy, N. M., Tee, E. Y. J., & Tse, H. H. M. (2009). What goes around comes around: How meso-level negative emotional contagion can ultimately determine organizational attitudes toward leaders. The Leadership Quarterly, 20 (4), 571–585.Google Scholar
Day, R. D. (1995). Family-systems theory. In Day, R. D., Gilbert, K. R., Settles, B. H., & Burr, W. R. (Eds.), Research and theory in family science (pp. 91–101). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
Demerouti, E. (2012). The spillover and crossover of resources among partners: The role of work–self and family–self facilitation. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 17(2), 184–195.Google Scholar
Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., & Schaufeli, W. (2005). Spillover and crossover of exhaustion and life satisfaction among dual-earner parents. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 67, 266–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., Sonnentag, S., & Fullagar, C. J. (2012). Work‐related flow and energy at work and at home: A study on the role of daily recovery. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(2), 276–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demsky, C. A., Ellis, A. M., & Fritz, C. (2014). Shrugging it off: Does psychological detachment from work mediate the relationship between workplace aggression and work-family conflict? Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 19, 195–205.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dikkers, J. S. E., Geurts, S. A. E., Kinnunen, U., Kompier, M. A. J., & Taris, T. W. (2007). Crossover between work and home in dyadic partner relationships. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 48(6), 529–538.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doumas, D. M., Margolin, G., & John, R. S. (2008). Spillover patterns in single-earner couples: Work, self-care, and the marital relationship. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 29(1), 55–73.Google Scholar
Dunn, L. B., Iglewicz, A., & Moutier, C. (2008). A conceptual model of medical student well-being: Promoting resilience and preventing burnout. Academic Psychiatry, 32(1), 44–53.Google Scholar
Eby, L. T., Casper, W. J., Lockwood, A., Bordeaux, C., & Brinley, A. (2005). Work and family research in IO/OB: Content analysis and review of the literature (1980–2002). Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66, 124–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, J. R. (2010). Reconsidering theoretical progress in organizational and management research. Organizational Research Methods, 13(4), 615–619.Google Scholar
Farh, C. C., & Chen, Z. (2014). Beyond the individual victim: Multilevel consequences of abusive supervision in teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, doi:10.1037/a0037636CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferguson, M. (2012). You cannot leave it at the office: Spillover and crossover of coworker incivility. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(4), 571–588.Google Scholar
Ferguson, M., Carlson, D., Zivnuska, S., & Whitten, D. (2010). Is it better to receive than to give? Empathy in the conflict–distress relationship. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 15(3), 304–315.Google Scholar
Ferguson, M. (2012). Support at work and home: The path to satisfaction through balance. Journal Of Vocational Behavior, 80(2), 299–307. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2012.01.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferris, D. L., Brown, D. J., Berry, J. W., & Lian, H. (2008). The development and validation of the workplace ostracism scale. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 1348–1366.Google Scholar
Forthofer, M. S., Markman, H. J., Cox, M., Stanley, S., & Kessler, R. C. (1996). Associations between marital distress and work loss in a national sample. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58(3), 597–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frone, M. R., Russell, M., & Cooper, M. L. (1992). Antecedents and outcomes of work-family conflict: Testing a model of the work-family interface. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 65–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giumetti, G. W., Hatfield, A. L., Scisco, J. L., Schroeder, A. N., Muth, E. R., & Kowalski, R. M. (2013). What a rude e-mail! Examining the differential effects of incivility versus support on mood, energy, engagement, and performance in an online context. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 18(3), 297–309.Google Scholar
Green, S. G., Bull Schaefer, R. A., MacDermid, S. M., & Weiss, H. M. (2011). Partner reactions to work-to-family conflict: Cognitive appraisal and indirect crossover in couples. Journal of Management, 37(3), 744–769.Google Scholar
Greenhaus, J. H., & Powell, G. N. 2006. When work and family are allies: A theory of work-family enrichment. Academy of Management Review, 31(1), 72–92.Google Scholar
Groenestijn, E., Buunk, B. P., & Schaufeli, W. B. (1992). The danger of burnout contagion: The role of social comparison processes. In Meertens, R. W., Buunk, A. P., van Lange, P. A. M., & Verplanken, B. (Eds.), Sociale psychologie and beı ¨nvloeding van intermenselijke engezondheidsproblemen (pp. 88–103). The Hague: VUGA.Google Scholar
Grzywacz, J. G., & Marks, N. F. (2000). Family, work, work-family spillover and problem drinking during midlife. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62(2), 336–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haines, V. Y., Marchand, A., & Harvey, S. (2006). Crossover of workplace aggression experiences in dual-earner couples. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 11, 305–314.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Halbesleben, J. R. B., Zellars, K. L., Carlson, D. C., Perrewé, P. L., & Rotondo, D. (2010). The moderating effect of work-linked couple relationships and work-family integration on the spouse instrumental support-emotional exhaustion relationship. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 15, 371–387.Google Scholar
Hammer, L. B., Allen, E., & Grigsby, T. D. (1997). Work–family conflict in dual-earner couples: Within-individual and crossover effects of work and family. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 50(2), 185–203.Google Scholar
Hammer, L. B., Cullen, J. C., Neal, M. B., Sinclair, R. R., & Shafiro, M. V. (2005). The longitudinal effects of work-family conflict and positive spillover on depressive symptoms among dual-earner couples. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 10(2), 138–154.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44, 513–524.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hobfoll, S. E. (2001). The influence of culture, community, and the nested-self in the stress process: Advancing conservation of resources theory. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 50, 337–421.Google Scholar
Hoobler, J. M., & Brass, D. J. (2006). Abusive supervision and family undermining as displaced aggression. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 1125–1133.Google Scholar
Hoobler, J. M., & Hu, J. (2013). A model of injustice, abusive supervision, and negative affect. The Leadership Quarterly, 24, 256–269.Google Scholar
Hoobler, J. M., & Swanberg, J. (2006). The enemy is not us: Unexpected workplace violence trends. Public Personnel Management, 35 (3), 229–246.Google Scholar
Keene, J., & Reynolds, J. R. (2005). The job costs of family demands: Gender differences in negative family-to-work spillover. Journal of Family Issues, 26(3), 275–299.Google Scholar
Kiewitz, C., Restubog, S. D., Zagenczyk, T. J., Scott, K. D., Garcia, P. M., & Tang, R. L. (2012). Sins of the parents: Self-control as a buffer between supervisors’ previous experience of family undermining and subordinates’ perceptions of abusive supervision. The Leadership Quarterly, 23(5), 869–882.Google Scholar
Kinnunen, U., Feldt, T., Mauno, S., & Rantanen, J. (2010). Interface between work and family: A longitudinal individual and crossover perspective. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83(1), 119–137.Google Scholar
Kramer, A. D. I., Guillory, J. E., & Hancock, J. T. (2014). Experimental evidence of massive-scale emotional contagion through social networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(24), 8788–8790.Google Scholar
Lavee, Y., & Ben-Ari, A. (2007). Relationship of dyadic closeness with work-related stress: A daily diary study. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69(4), 1021–1035.Google Scholar
LeBlanc, M. M., Barling, J., & Turner, N. (2014). Intimate partner aggression and women’s work outcomes. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 19(4), 399–412.Google Scholar
Lim, S., & Lee, A. (2011). Work and nonwork outcomes of workplace incivility: Does family support help? Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 16, 95–111. DOI: 10.1037/a0021726Google Scholar
Lim, S., & Tai, K. (2014). Family incivility and job performance: A moderated mediation model of psychological distress and core self-evaluation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(2). Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.proxy.cc.uic.edu/docview/1509457543?pq-origsite=summonGoogle Scholar
Liu, J., Kwan, H., Lee, C., & Hui, C. (2013). Work‐to‐family spillover effects of workplace ostracism: The role of work‐home segmentation preferences. Human Resource Management, 52(1), 75–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maslach, C., Schaufeli, W. B., & Leiter, M. P. (2001). Job burnout. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 397–422.Google Scholar
Matthews, R. A., Del Priore, R. E., Acitelli, L. K., & Barnes-Farrell, J. L. (2006). Work-to-relationship conflict: Crossover effects in dual-earner couples. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 11(3), 228–240.Google Scholar
Maume, D. J., & Houston, P. (2001). Job segregation and gender differences in work-family spillover among white-collar workers. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 22(2), 171–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mauno, S., & Kinnunen, U. (1999). The effects of job stressors on marital satisfaction in Finnish dual-earner couples. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20(6), 879–895.Google Scholar
Mawritz, M. B., Mayer, D. M., Hoobler, J. M., Wayne, S. J., & Marinova, S. V. 2012. A trickle-down model of abusive supervision. Personnel Psychology, 65(2), 325–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNulty, Y. (2012). “Being dumped in to sink or swim”: An empirical study of organizational support for the trailing spouse. Human Resource Development International, 15(4), 417–434.Google Scholar
Meijman, T. F., & Mulder, G. (1998). Psychological aspects of workload. In Drenth, P. J. D. & Thierry, H. (Eds.), Handbook of work and organizational psychology, Vol. 2, Work psychology (pp. 5–33). Hove: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Miner, K. N., Pesonen, A. D., Smittick, A. L., Seigel, M. L., & Clark, E. K. (2014). Does being a mom help or hurt? Workplace inciviiltity as a function of motherhood status. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 19, 60–73.Google Scholar
Mitchell, M. S., & Ambrose, M. L. (2012). Employees’ behavioral reactions to supervisor aggression: An examination of individual and situational factors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(6), 1148–1170.Google Scholar
Mitchell, T. R., Holtom, B. C., Lee, T. W., Sablynski, C. J., & Erez, M. (2001). Why people stay: Using job embeddedness to predict voluntary turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 1102–1121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, M. S., Vogel, R. M., & Folger, R. (2015). Third parties’ reactions to the abusive supervision of coworkers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(4), 1040–1055.Google Scholar
Namie, G., & Namie, R. (2000). The bully at work. Naperville, IL: Sourcebooks.Google Scholar
Nandkeolyar, A. K., Shaffer, J. A., Li, A., Ekkirala, S., & Bagger, J. (2014). Surviving an abusive supervisor: The joint roles of conscientiousness and coping strategies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(1), 138–150.Google Scholar
Neff, A., Niessen, C., Sonnentag, S., & Unger, D. (2013). Expanding crossover research: The crossover of job-related self-efficacy within couples. Human Relations, 66(6), 803–827.Google Scholar
Neff, L. A., & Karney, B. R. (2007). Stress crossover in newlywed marriage: A longitudinal and dyadic perspective. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69(3), 594–607.Google Scholar
Parrenas, R. S. (2001). Servants of globalization: Women, migration, and domestic work. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Pedersen, D. E., & Minnotte, K. L. (2012a). Dual earner husbands and wives: Marital satisfaction and the workplace culture of each spouse. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 33(3), 272–282.Google Scholar
Pedersen, D. E. (2012b). Self- and spouse-reported work–family conflict and dual-earners’ job satisfaction. Marriage & Family Review, 48(3), 272–292.Google Scholar
Pines, A. M., Neal, M. B., Hammer, L. B., & Icekson, T. (2011). Job burnout and couple burnout in dual-earner couples in the sandwiched generation. Social Psychology Quarterly, 74(4), 361–386.Google Scholar
Pleck, J. H., & Staines, G. L. (1985). Work schedules and family life in two-earner couples. Journal of Family Issues, 6, 61–82.Google Scholar
Polatci, S., & Akdogan, A. (2014). Psychological capital and performance: The mediating role of work family spillover and psychological well-being. Business and Economics Research Journal, 5(1), 1–15.Google Scholar
Restubog, S. D., Scott, K. L., & Zagenczyk, T. J. (2011). When distress hits home: The role of contextual factors and psychological distress in predicting employees’ responses to abusive supervision. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(4), 713–729.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robinson, S. L., & O’Leary-Kelly, A. M. (1998). Monkey see, monkey do: The influence of work groups on the antisocial behavior of employees. Academy of Management Journal, 41(6), 658–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodríguez-Muñoz, A., Sanz-Vergel, A. I., Demerouti, E., & Bakker, A. B. (2014). Engaged at work and happy at home: A spillover–crossover model. Journal of Happiness Studies, 15(2), 271–283.Google Scholar
Sandberg, J. G., Yorgason, J. B., Miller, R. B., & Hill, E. J. (2012). Family‐to‐work spillover in Singapore: Marital distress, physical and mental health, and work satisfaction. Family Relations: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Applied Family Studies, 61(1), 1–15.Google Scholar
Sanz-Vergel, A., & Rodríguez-Muñoz, A. (2013). The spillover and crossover of daily work enjoyment and well-being: A diary study among working couples. Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 29, 179–185.Google Scholar
Sanz-Vergel, A., Rodríguez-Muñoz, A., Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2012). The daily spillover and crossover of emotional labor: Faking emotions at work and at home. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 81(2), 209–217.Google Scholar
Sanz‐Vergel, A. I., Rodríguez‐Muñoz, A., & Nielsen, K. (2015). The thin line between work and home: The spillover and crossover of daily conflicts. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sears, H. A., & Galambos, N. L. (1992). Women’s work conditions and marital adjustment in two-earner couples: A structural model. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54(4), 789–797.Google Scholar
Shimazu, A., Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., Shimada, K., & Kawakami, N. (2011). Workaholism and well-being among Japanese dual-earner couples: A spillover-crossover perspective. Social Science & Medicine, 73(3), 399–409.Google Scholar
Smith, S. R., Hamon, R. R., Ingoldsby, B. B., & Miller, J. E. (2009). Exploring family theories. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Song, Z., Foo, M., & Uy, M. A. (2008). Mood spillover and crossover among dual-earner couples: A cell phone event sampling study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(2), 443–452.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Song, Z., Foo, M., Uy, M. A., & Sun, S. (2011). Unraveling the daily stress crossover between unemployed individuals and their employed spouses. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(1), 151–168.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sonnentag, S. (2003). Recovery, work engagement, and proactive behavior: a new look at the interface between nonwork and work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(3), 518–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sonnentag, S., & Fritz, C. (2007). The Recovery Experience Questionnaire: Development and validation of a measure for assessing recuperation and unwinding from work. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 12(3), 204–221.Google Scholar
Stander, V. A., Thomsen, C. J., Merrill, L. L., Rabenhorst, M. M., Crouch, J. L., & Milner, J. S. (2011). Gender and military contextual risk factors for intimate partner aggression. Military Psychology, 23(6), 639–658.Google Scholar
Stevens, D., Kiger, G., & Riley, P. J. (2006). His, hers, or ours? Work-to-family spillover, crossover, and family cohesion. The Social Science Journal, 43(3), 425–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ten Brummelhuis, L. L., & Bakker, A. B. (2012). A resource perspective on the work–home interface: The work–home resources model. American Psychologist, 67(7), 545–556.Google Scholar
ten Brummelhuis, L. L., Haar, J. M., & van der Lippe, T. (2010). Crossover of distress due to work and family demands in dual-earner couples: A dyadic analysis. Work & Stress, 24(4), 324–341.Google Scholar
Tepper, B. J. (2000). Consequences of abusive supervision. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 178–190.Google Scholar
Tepper, B. J., Duffy, M. K., Henle, C. A., & Lambert, L. S. (2006). Procedural injustice, victim precipitation, and abusive supervision. Personnel Psychology, 59(1), 101–123.Google Scholar
Tepper, B. J., Duffy, M. K., & Shaw, J. D. (2001). Personality moderators of the relationship between abusive supervision and subordinates’ resistance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(5), 974–983.Google Scholar
Tepper, B. J., Moss, S. E., Lockhart, D. E., & Carr, J. C. (2007). Abusive supervision, upward maintenance communication, and subordinates’ psychological distress. Academy of Management Journal, 50(5), 1169–1180.Google Scholar
Thoits, P. (1986). Social support as coping assistance. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 54, 416–423.Google Scholar
Van der Zee, K. I., Ali, A. J., & Salomé, E. (2005). Role interference and subjective well-being among expatriate families. European Journal of Work And Organizational Psychology, 14(3), 239–262.Google Scholar
van Emmerik, I. J. H., & Jawahar, I. M. (2006). The independent relationships of objective and subjective workload with couples’ mood. Human Relations, 59(10), 1371–1392.Google Scholar
van Steenbergen, E. F., Kluwer, E. S., & Karney, B. R. (2011). Workload and the trajectory of marital satisfaction in newlyweds: Job satisfaction, gender, and parental status as moderators. Journal of Family Psychology, 25(3), 345–355.Google Scholar
van Steenbergen, E. F. (2014). Work–family enrichment, work–family conflict, and marital satisfaction: A dyadic analysis. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 19(2), 182–194.Google Scholar
Waters, S. F., West, T. V., & Mendes, W. B. (2014). Stress contagion: Physiological covariation between mothers and infants. Psychological Science, 25(4), 934–942.Google Scholar
Westman, M. (2001). Stress and strain crossover. Human Relations, 54, 717–751.Google Scholar
Westman, M. (2006). Crossover of stress and strain in the work-family context. In Jones, F., Burke, R. J., & Westman, M. (Eds.), Work-life balance: A psychological perspective (pp. 163–184). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Westman, M., Bakker, A. B., Roziner, I., & Sonnentag, S. (2011). Crossover of job demands and emotional exhaustion with teams: A longitudinal multilevel study. Anxiety, Stress, & Coping, 24, 561–577.Google Scholar
Westman, M., Brough, P., & Kalliath, T. (2009). Expert commentary on work-life balance and crossover of emotions and experiences: Theoretical and practice advancements. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30(5), 587–595.Google Scholar
Westman, M., & Etzion, D. (1995). Crossover of stress, strain and resources from one spouse to another. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16(2), 169–181.Google Scholar
Westman, M. (2005). Short overseas business trips: A respite or source of stress? In Columbus, A. (Ed.), Advances in psychology research (Vol. 37, pp. 199–213). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers.Google Scholar
Wheeler, A. R., Halbesleben, J. B., & Whitman, M. V. (2013). The interactive effects of abusive supervision and entitlement on emotional exhaustion and co‐worker abuse. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 86(4), 477–496.Google Scholar
Winstok, Z. (2006). Gender differences in the intention to react to aggressive action at home and in the workplace. Aggressive Behavior, 32(5), 433–441.Google Scholar
Wu, L. Z., Kwan, H. K., Liu, J., & Resick, C. J. (2012). Work-to-family spillover effects of abusive supervision. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 27, 714–731.Google Scholar
Zhang, S., & Eamon, M. (2011). Parenting practices as mediators of the effect of mothers’ community violence exposure on young children’s aggressive behavior. Families in Society, 92(3), 336–343.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×