Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-tn8tq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-05T23:37:54.611Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

20 - Radiological Imaging of the Chest in Pregnancy

from Section 5 - Other Pulmonary Issues in Pregnancy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2020

Stephen E. Lapinsky
Affiliation:
Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto
Lauren A. Plante
Affiliation:
Drexel University Hospital, Philadelphia
Get access

Summary

Respiratory diseases in pregnancy such as pneumonia or thromboembolic disease are relatively common, and thoracic imaging can be crucial to the diagnosis. Radiologic modalities are subdivided into ionizing or non-ionizing techniques. In pregnancy, ideally, it is preferable to choose non-ionizing modalities to avoid radiation exposure. However, the choice of imaging modality also needs to take into account the modality best likely to obtain the diagnosis. Amongst physicians, the perceived fetal risk from ionizing radiation exposure in pregnancy is generally higher than the actual risk.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Wieseler, KM, Bhargava, P, Kanal, KM, et al. Imaging in pregnant patients: examination appropriateness. Radiographics. 2010 30(5):1215–29; discussion 30–3.Google Scholar
Leung, AN, Bull, TM, Jaeschke, R, et al. American Thoracic Society documents: an official American Thoracic Society/Society of Thoracic Radiology Clinical Practice guideline – evaluation of suspected pulmonary embolism in pregnancy. Radiology. 2012 262(2):635–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chan, WS, Rey, E, Kent, NE, et al. Venous thromboembolism and antithrombotic therapy in pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2014 36(6):527–53.Google Scholar
Kal, HB, Struikmans, H. [Pregnancy and medical irradiation; summary and conclusions from the International Commission on Radiological Protection, Publication 84]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2002 146(7):299303.Google Scholar
Parshkov, EM, Sokolov, VA, Proshin, AD, Stepanenko, VF. [Thyroid cancer in children and in the adult population in the Bryansk Region after the Chernobyl disaster]. Vopr Onkol. 2004 50(5):533–9.Google Scholar
Ivanov, EP, Tolochko, GV, Shuvaeva, LP, et al. Infant leukemia in Belarus after the Chernobyl accident. Radiat Environ Biophys. 1998 37(1):53–5.Google Scholar
Goldstein, L, Murphy, D.P. Etiology of ill health in children born after maternal pelvic irradiation. II. Defective children born after post conceptional maternal irradiation. Am J Roentgenol. 1929 22:322–31.Google Scholar
Stewart, A, Webb, J, Hewitt, D. A survey of childhood malignancies. Br Med J. 1958 1(5086):1495–508.Google Scholar
Rajaraman, P, Simpson, J, Neta, G, et al. Early life exposure to diagnostic radiation and ultrasound scans and risk of childhood cancer: case-control study. Br Med J. 2011 342:d472.Google Scholar
Tremblay, E, Therasse, E, Thomassin-Naggara, I, Trop, I. Quality initiatives: guidelines for use of medical imaging during pregnancy and lactation. Radiographics. 2012 32(3):897911.Google Scholar
Ray, JG, Schull, MJ, Urquia, ML, et al. Major radiodiagnostic imaging in pregnancy and the risk of childhood malignancy: a population-based cohort study in Ontario. PLoS Med. 2010 7(9):e1000337.Google Scholar
Chen, MM, Coakley, FV, Kaimal, A, Laros, RK, Jr. Guidelines for computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging use during pregnancy and lactation. Obstet Gynecol. 2008 112(2 Pt 1):333–40.Google Scholar
Bourjeily, G, Paidas, M, Khalil, H, Rosene-Montella, K, Rodger, M. Pulmonary embolism in pregnancy. Lancet. 2010 375(9713):500–12.Google Scholar
Cutts, BA, Dasgupta, D, Hunt, BJ. New directions in the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary embolism in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 208(2):102–8.Google Scholar
Burton, KR, Park, AL, Fralick, M, Ray, JG. Risk of early onset breast cancer among women exposed to thoracic computed tomography in pregnancy or early postpartum. J Thromb Haemost. 2018 16(5):876885.Google Scholar
Jain, V, Chari, R, Maslovitz, S, et al. Guidelines for the management of a pregnant trauma patient. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015 37(6):553–74.Google Scholar
Angel, E, Wellnitz, CV, Goodsitt, MM, et al. Radiation dose to the fetus for pregnant patients undergoing multidetector CT imaging: Monte Carlo simulations estimating fetal dose for a range of gestational age and patient size. Radiology. 2008 249(1):220–7.Google Scholar
Hurwitz, LM, Yoshizumi, T, Reiman, RE, et al. Radiation dose to the fetus from body MDCT during early gestation. Am J Roentgenol. 2006 186(3):871–6.Google Scholar
Niemann, T, Nicolas, G, Roser, HW, Muller-Brand, J, Bongartz, G. Imaging for suspected pulmonary embolism in pregnancy-what about the fetal dose? A comprehensive review of the literature. Insights Imaging. 2010 1(5–6):361–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pahade, JK, Litmanovich, D, Pedrosa, I, et al. Quality initiatives: imaging pregnant patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: what the radiologist needs to know. Radiographics. 2009 29(3):639–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Benveniste, H, Fowler, JS, Rooney, WD, et al. Maternal-fetal in vivo imaging: a combined PET and MRI study. J Nucl Med. 2003 44(9):1522–30.Google Scholar
Zanotti-Fregonara, P, Chastan, M, Edet-Sanson, A, et al. New fetal dose estimates from 18F-FDG administered during pregnancy: standardization of dose calculations and estimations with voxel-based anthropomorphic phantoms. J Nucl Med. 2016 57(11):1760–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zanotti-Fregonara, P, Laforest, R, Wallis, JW. Fetal radiation dose from 18F-FDG in pregnant patients imaged with PET, PET/ CT,and PET/MR. J Nucl Med. 2015 56(8):1218–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brenner, B, Avivi, I, Lishner, M. Haematological cancers in pregnancy. Lancet. 2012 379(9815):580–7.Google Scholar
Morice, P, Uzan, C, Gouy, S, Verschraegen, C, Haie-Meder, C. Gynaecological cancers in pregnancy. Lancet. 2012 379(9815):558–69.Google Scholar
Zanotti-Fregonara, P, Koroscil, TM, Mantil, J, Satter, M. Radiation dose to the fetus from [(18)F]-FDG administration during the second trimester of pregnancy. Health Phys. 2012 102(2):217–19.Google Scholar
Tirada, N, Dreizin, D, Khati, NJ, Akin, EA, Zeman, RK. Imaging pregnancy and lactating patients. Radiographics. 2015 35(6):1751–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knight, M, Tuffnell, D. A view from the UK: the UK and Ireland Confidential Enquiry into Maternal Deaths and Morbidity. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2018 61(2):347358.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carson, JL, Kelley, MA, Duff, A, et al. The clinical course of pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med. 1992 326(19):1240–5.Google Scholar
Van der Pol, LM, Mairuhu, AT, Tromeur, C, et al. Use of clinical prediction rules and D-dimer tests in the diagnostic management of pregnant patients with suspected acute pulmonary embolism. Blood Rev. 2017 31(2):31–6.Google Scholar
Konstantinides, SV, Torbicki, A, Agnelli, G, et al. 2014 ESC guidelines on the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism. Eur Heart J. 2014 35(43):3033–69, 69a-69k.Google Scholar
RCOG Green-top guideline No. 37b 2015. Thromboembolic Disease in Pregnancy and the Puerperium: Acute Management. Available at www.rcog.org.uk/globalassets/documents/guidelines/gtg-37b.pdfGoogle Scholar
Bajc, M, Olsson, B, Gottsater, A, Hindorf, C, Jogi, J. V/P SPECT as a diagnostic tool for pregnant women with suspected pulmonary embolism. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015 42(8):1325–30.Google Scholar
Bajc, M, Neilly, JB, Miniati, M, et al. EANM guidelines for ventilation/perfusion scintigraphy : Part 2. Algorithms and clinical considerations for diagnosis of pulmonary emboli with V/P(SPECT) and MDCT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2009 36(9):1528–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van Mens, TE, Scheres, LJ, de Jong, PG, et al. Imaging for the exclusion of pulmonary embolism in pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 (1):CD011053.Google Scholar
Armstrong, L, Gleeson, F, Mackillop, L, Mutch, S, Beale, A. Survey of UK imaging practice for the investigation of pulmonary embolism in pregnancy. Clin Radiol. 2017 72(8):696701.Google Scholar
Revel, MP, Cohen, S, Sanchez, O, et al. Pulmonary embolism during pregnancy: diagnosis with lung scintigraphy or CT angiography? Radiology. 2011 258(2):590–8.Google Scholar
Anderson, DR, Kahn, SR, Rodger, MA, et al. Computed tomographic pulmonary angiography vs ventilation-perfusion lung scanning in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: a randomized controlled trial. J Am Med Assoc. 2007 298(23):2743–5.Google Scholar
Cahill, AG, Stout, MJ, Macones, GA, Bhalla, S. Diagnosing pulmonary embolism in pregnancy using computed-tomographic angiography or ventilation-perfusion. Obstet Gynecol. 2009 114(1):124–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reinartz, P, Wildberger, JE, Schaefer, W, et al. Tomographic imaging in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: a comparison between V/Q lung scintigraphy in SPECT technique and multislice spiral CT. J Nucl Med. 2004 45(9):1501–8.Google ScholarPubMed
Bajc, M, Neilly, JB, Miniati, M, et al. EANM guidelines for ventilation/perfusion scintigraphy : Part 1. Pulmonary imaging with ventilation/perfusion single photon emission tomography. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2009 36(8):1356–70.Google Scholar
McCollough, CH, Bruesewitz, MR, Kofler, JM, Jr. CT dose reduction and dose management tools: overview of available options. Radiographics. 2006 26(2):503–12.Google Scholar
Hopper, KD, King, SH, Lobell, ME, TenHave, TR, Weaver, JS. The breast: in-plane x-ray protection during diagnostic thoracic CT–shielding with bismuth radioprotective garments. Radiology. 1997 205(3):853–8.Google Scholar
Colletti, PM, Micheli, OA, Lee, KH. To shield or not to shield: application of bismuth breast shields. Am J Roentgenol. 2013 200(3):503–7.Google Scholar
Sheen, JJ, Haramati, LB, Natenzon, A, et al. Performance of low-dose perfusion scintigraphy and CT pulmonary angiography for pulmonary embolism in pregnancy. Chest. 2018 153(1):152–60.Google Scholar
ACR Committee on Drugs and Contrast Media. ACR Manual On Contrast Media Version 10.3, 2018.Google Scholar
Bourjeily, G, Chalhoub, M, Phornphutkul, C, et al. Neonatal thyroid function: effect of a single exposure to iodinated contrast medium in utero. Radiology. 2010 256(3):744–50.Google Scholar
Sachs, HC; Committee On Drugs. The transfer of drugs and therapeutics into human breast milk: an update on selected topics. Pediatrics. 2013 132(3):e796809.Google Scholar
Patenaude, Y, Pugash, D, Lim, K, et al. The use of magnetic resonance imaging in the obstetric patient. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2014; 36:349–63.Google Scholar
Ray, JG, Bharatha, A, Montanera, WJ. Magnetic resonance imaging exposure during pregnancy: reply. J Am Med Assoc. 2016 316(21):2275–6.Google Scholar
ICRP. Radiation dose to patients from radiopharmaceuticals: Addendum 3 to ICRP Publication 53. ICRP Publication 106. Ann. ICRP 38 (1–2).Google Scholar
Sokolowski, JW, Jr., Burgher, LW, Jones, FL, Jr., Patterson, JR, Selecky, PA. Guidelines for thoracentesis and needle biopsy of the pleura. This position paper of the American Thoracic Society was adopted by the ATS Board of Directors, June 1988. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1989 140(1):257–8.Google Scholar
Barnes, TW, Morgenthaler, TI, Olson, EJ, et al. Sonographically guided thoracentesis and rate of pneumothorax. J Clin Ultrasound. 2005 33(9):442–6.Google Scholar
Boussios, S, Han, SN, Fruscio, R, et al. Lung cancer in pregnancy: report of nine cases from an international collaborative study. Lung Cancer. 2013 82(3):499505.Google Scholar
Stein, PD, Chenevert, TL, Fowler, SE, et al. Gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography for pulmonary embolism: a multicenter prospective study (PIOPED III). Ann Intern Med. 2010 152(7):434–43, W142–3.Google Scholar
American College of Radiology. ACR-SPR Practice parameter for the safe and optimal performance of fetal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Revised 2015 (resolution 11)Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×