Book contents
- Resurrection as Salvation
- Resurrection as Salvation
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Tables
- Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- 1 Resurrection of All for Judgment or of the Righteous as Salvation?
- 2 Irenaeus: Resurrection and Salvation through the Spirit
- 3 Tertullian: Resurrection and Judgment
- 4 The Valentinian Treatise on the Resurrection and Gospel of Philip: Resurrection and Salvation into True Reality
- 5 Origen: Resurrection and Moral Transformation
- 6 Methodius of Olympus: Resurrection, Salvation from Sin, and Judgment
- Conclusion
- Bibliography
- Index of Ancient Sources
- Subject Index
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 July 2018
Book contents
- Resurrection as Salvation
- Resurrection as Salvation
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Tables
- Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- 1 Resurrection of All for Judgment or of the Righteous as Salvation?
- 2 Irenaeus: Resurrection and Salvation through the Spirit
- 3 Tertullian: Resurrection and Judgment
- 4 The Valentinian Treatise on the Resurrection and Gospel of Philip: Resurrection and Salvation into True Reality
- 5 Origen: Resurrection and Moral Transformation
- 6 Methodius of Olympus: Resurrection, Salvation from Sin, and Judgment
- Conclusion
- Bibliography
- Index of Ancient Sources
- Subject Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Resurrection as SalvationDevelopment and Conflict in Pre-Nicene Paulinism, pp. 271 - 284Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
Alcain, José Antonio. Cautiverio y redención del hombre en Orígenes. Publicaciones de la Universidad de Deusto, Teología Deusto 4. Bilbao: Mensajero, 1973.Google Scholar
Alexandre, Jérôme. Une chair pour la gloire: L’anthropologie réaliste et mystique de Tertullien. Théologie historique 115. Paris: Beauchesne, 2001.Google Scholar
Andia, Ysabel de. Homo vivens: incorruptibilité et divinisation de l’homme selon Irénée de Lyons. Paris: Études Augustiniennes, 1986.Google Scholar
Bacq, Philippe. De l’ancienne à la nouvelle Alliance selon S. Irénée: unité du Livre IV de l’Adversus Haereses. Paris: Lethielleux, 1978.Google Scholar
Balás, David L. “The Use and Interpretation of Paul in Irenaeus’s Five Books Adversus Haereses.” SCe 9 (1992): 27–39.Google Scholar
Bammel, C. P. “Adam in Origen.” In The Making of Orthodoxy: Essays in Honour of Henry Chadwick, edited by Williams, Rowan, 62–93. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Barnes, Timothy D. Tertullian: A Historical and Literary Study. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Barnett, Paul. The Second Epistle to the Corinthians. NICNT. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Behr, John. Asceticism and Anthropology in Irenaeus and Clement. Oxford Early Christian Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Behr, John. Irenaeus of Lyons: Identifying Christianity. Christian Theology in Context. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Behr, John. The Mystery of Christ: Life in Death. Crestwood, NY: St. Vladimir’s Seminary Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Behr, John. ed. St. Irenaeus of Lyons: On the Apostolic Preaching. Crestwood, NY: St. Vladimir’s Seminary Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Alan E. The Formation of Hell: Death and Retribution in the Ancient and Early Christian Worlds. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Blosser, Benjamin P. Become Like the Angels: Origen’s Doctrine of the Soul. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Bonwetsch, Nathanael. Die Theologie des Methodius von Olympus. Berlin: Weidmann, 1903.Google Scholar
Bostock, D. G. “Quality and Corporeity in Origen.” In Origeniana Secunda, edited by Crouzel, Henri, 323–37. Rome: Edizioni dell’Ateneo, 1980.Google Scholar
Bousset, Wilhelm. Die Religion des Judentums im späthellenistischen Zeitalter. HNT 21. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck), 1926.Google Scholar
Bousset, Wilhelm. Kyrios Christos: A History of the Belief in Christ from the Beginnings of Christianity to Irenaeus. Translated by John E. Steely. Nashville, TN: Abingdon, 1970.Google Scholar
Brakke, David. The Gnostics: Myth, Ritual, and Diversity in Early Christianity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Brandhuber, Georg. “Die sekundären Lesarten bei 1 Kor. 15, 51: Ihre Verbreitung und Entstehung.” Bib 18 (1937): 303–33, 418–38.Google Scholar
Braun, René. Deus Christianorum: recherches sur le vocabulaire doctrinal de Tertullien. Paris: Études Augustiniennes, 1977.Google Scholar
Brésard, Luc, and Fédou, Michel, eds. Origène: Commentaire sur l’Épître aux Romains. 4 vols. SC 532, 539, 543, 555. Paris: Éditions du Cerf, 2009–2012.Google Scholar
Briggman, Anthony. Irenaeus of Lyons and the Theology of the Holy Spirit. Oxford Early Christian Studies. New York: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Brown, Peter. The Body and Society: Men, Women, and Sexual Renunciation in Early Christianity. ACLS Lectures on the History of Religions, n.s., 13. New York: Columbia University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Brown, Raymond E. The Gospel According to John (I-XII). AB 29. Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchheit, Vinzenz. Studien zu Methodius von Olympos. TU 69. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 1958.Google Scholar
Buckley, Jorunn Jacobsen. “Conceptual Models and Polemical Issues in the Gospel of Philip.” ANRW 25.5 (1988): 4167–94.Google Scholar
Buckley, Jorunn Jacobsen. “A Cult-Mystery in The Gospel of Philip.” JBL 99 (1980): 569–81.Google Scholar
Bultmann, Rudolf. Theology of the New Testament. Translated by Kendrick Grobel. Vol. 1. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1951.Google Scholar
Buonaiuti, Ernesto. “The Ethics and Eschatology of Methodius of Olympus.” HTR 14 (1921): 255–66.Google Scholar
Butterworth, G. W., ed. Origen: On First Principles. Gloucester, MA: Peter Smith, 1973.Google Scholar
Bynum, Caroline Walker. The Resurrection of the Body in Western Christianity, 200–1336. ACLS Lectures on the History of Religions, n.s., 15. New York: Columbia University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Calvin, John. Institutes of the Christian Religion. Translated by Ford Lewis Battles. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox, 1960.Google Scholar
Cardman, Francine Jo. “Tertullian on the Resurrection.” Ph.D. thesis, Yale University, 1974.Google Scholar
Carleton Paget, James. “Marcion and the Resurrection: Some Thoughts on a Recent Book.” JSNT 35 (2012): 74–102.Google Scholar
Cavallin, Hans C. C. Life After Death: Paul’s Argument for the Resurrection of the Dead in 1 Cor 15: Part I: An Enquiry into the Jewish Background. ConBNT 7/1. Lund: Gleerup, 1974.Google Scholar
Chadwick, Henry. “Origen, Celsus, and the Resurrection of the Body.” HTR 41 (1948): 83–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chadwick, Henry. ed. Origen: Contra Celsum. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1953.Google Scholar
Chadwick, Henry. “Rufinus and the Tura Papyrus of Origen’s Commentary on Romans.” JTS (n.s.) 10 (1959): 10–42.Google Scholar
Charles, R. H. A Critical History of the Doctrine of a Future Life in Israel, in Judaism, and in Christianity. London: Adam and Charles Black, 1899.Google Scholar
Clark, Elizabeth A. The Origenist Controversy: The Cultural Construction of an Early Christian Debate. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crouzel, Henri. “Différences entre les ressuscités selon Origène.” JAC, Ergänzungsband 9 (1982): 107–16.Google Scholar
Crouzel, Henri. “L’anthropologie d’Origène dans la perspective du combat spirituel.” RAM 31 (1955): 364–85.Google Scholar
Crouzel, Henri. “L’anthropologie d’Origène: de l’archē au telos.” In Arché e Telos, edited by Bianchi, Ugo and Crouzel, Henri, 36–49. Milan: Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 1981.Google Scholar
Crouzel, Henri. “La « première » et la « seconde » résurrection des hommes d’après Origène.” Didaskalia 3 (1973): 3–20.Google Scholar
Crouzel, Henri. “La thème platonicien du « véhicule de l’âme » chez Origène.” Didaskalia 7 (1977): 225–37.Google Scholar
Crouzel, Henri. “Les critiques adressées par Méthode et ses contemporains à la doctrine origénienne du corps ressuscité.” Greg 53 (1972): 679–716.Google Scholar
Crouzel, Henri. “Mort et immortalité selon Origène.” BLE 79 (1978): 19–38, 82–96, 181–96.Google Scholar
Crouzel, Henri. Origen. Translated by A. S. Worrall. San Francisco: Harper & Row, 1989.Google Scholar
Crouzel, Henri. Origène et la ‘connaissance mystique’. Museum Lessianum: Section théologique 56. Paris: Desclée de Brouwer, 1961.Google Scholar
Crouzel, Henri. Théologie de l’image de Dieu chez Origène. Théologie 34. Paris: Aubier, 1956.Google Scholar
Crouzel, Henri, and Simonetti, Manlio, eds. Origène: Traité des Principes. 5 vols. SC 252, 253, 268, 269, 312. Paris: Éditions du Cerf, 1978–1980.Google Scholar
Cullmann, Oscar. “Immortality of the Soul or Resurrection of the Dead: The Witness of the New Testament.” In Immortality and Resurrection: Death in the Western World: Two Conflicting Currents of Thought, edited by Stendahl, Krister, 9–47. New York: Macmillan, 1965.Google Scholar
Daley, Brian E. The Hope of the Early Church: A Handbook of Patristic Eschatology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Daniel-Hughes, Carly. The Salvation of the Flesh in Tertullian of Carthage: Dressing for the Resurrection. New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2011.Google Scholar
Daniélou, Jean. “La Fête des Tabernacles dans l’exégèse patristique.” SP 1 (1957): 262–79.Google Scholar
Daniélou, Jean. The Origins of Latin Christianity. Translated by David Smith and John Austin Baker. London: Darton, Longman & Todd, 1977.Google Scholar
Dassmann, Ernst. Der Stachel im Fleisch: Paulus in der frühchristlichen Literatur bis Irenäus. Münster: Aschendorff, 1979.Google Scholar
Davies, W. D. Paul and Rabbinic Judaism: Some Rabbinic Elements in Pauline Theology. London: SPCK, 1948.Google Scholar
Dechow, Jon F. Dogma and Mysticism in Early Christianity: Epiphanius of Cyprus and the Legacy of Origen. PMS 13. Macon, GA: Mercer University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Decock, Paul B. “The Resurrection according to Origen of Alexandria.” In Resurrection of the Dead: Biblical Traditions in Dialogue, edited by van Oyen, Geert and Shepherd, Tom, 497–513. Leuven: Peeters, 2012.Google Scholar
DeConick, April D. “The True Mysteries: Sacramentalism in the Gospel of Philip.” VC 55 (2001): 225–61.Google Scholar
Desjardins, Michael R. Sin in Valentinianism. SBL Dissertation Series 108. Atlanta, GA: Scholars Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Dunderberg, Ismo. Beyond Gnosticism: Myth, Lifestyle, and Society in the School of Valentinus. New York: Columbia University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Dupuis, Jacques. ‘L’esprit de l’homme’: Étude sur l’anthropologie religieuse d’Origène. Paris: Desclée de Brouwer, 1967.Google Scholar
Edwards, Mark. Origen Against Plato. Ashgate Studies in Philosophy & Theology in Late Antiquity. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2002.Google Scholar
Einstein, Albert, Podolsky, Boris, and Rosen, Nathan. “Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?” Physical Review 47 (1935): 777–80.Google Scholar
Elledge, C. D. Life after Death in Early Judaism: The Evidence of Josephus. WUNT 2/208. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2006.Google Scholar
Elledge, C. D. “Resurrection and Immortality: Navigating the Conceptual Boundaries in Hellenistic Judaism.” In Christian Origins and Hellenistic Judaism: Social and Literary Contexts for the New Testament, edited by Porter, Stanley E. and Pitts, Andrew W., 101–34. Leiden: Brill, 2013.Google Scholar
Elliott, Mark W. “The Triumph of Paulinism by the Mid-Third Century.” In Paul and the Second Century, edited by Bird, Michael F. and Dodson, Joseph, 244–56. New York: Continuum, 2011.Google Scholar
Eubank, Nathan. Wages of Cross-Bearing and the Debt of Sin: The Economy of Heaven in Matthew’s Gospel. BZNW 196. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2013.Google Scholar
Evans, Ernest, ed. Tertullian: Adversus Marcionem. 2 vols. OECT. Oxford: Clarendon, 1972.Google Scholar
Fantino, Jacques. L’homme image de Dieu chez saint Irénée de Lyon. Paris: Éditions du Cerf, 1986.Google Scholar
Fantino, Jacques. La théologie d’Irénée: lecture des Écritures en réponse à l’exégèse gnostique: une approche trinitaire. Paris: Éditions du Cerf, 1994.Google Scholar
Farges, Jacques. Les idées morales et religieuses de Méthode d’Olympe. Paris: Beauchesne, 1929.Google Scholar
Feldman, Louis H., ed. Josephus: Jewish Antiquities, Volume VIII: Books 18–19. LCL 433. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1965.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Everett. Baptism in the Early Church: History, Theology, and Liturgy in the First Five Centuries. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2009.Google Scholar
Fredouille, Jean-Claude. “Observations sur la terminologie anthropologique de Tertullien: constantes et variations.” In Les Péres de l’Église face à la science médicale de leur temps, edited by Boudon-Millot, Véronique and Pouderon, Bernard, 321–34. Paris: Beauchesne, 2005.Google Scholar
Gaffin, Richard B., Jr. The Centrality of the Resurrection: A Study in Paul’s Soteriology. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 1978.Google Scholar
Gager, John. “Body Symbols and Social Reality: Resurrection, Incarnation, and Asceticism in Early Christianity.” Religion 12 (1982): 345–63.Google Scholar
Gonzalez, Eliezer. “Anthropologies of Continuity: The Body and Soul in Tertullian, Perpetua, and Early Christianity.” JECS 21 (2013): 479–502.Google Scholar
Gonzalez, Eliezer. The Fate of the Dead in Early Third Century North African Christianity: The Passion of Perpetua and Felicitas and Tertullian. Studien und Texte zu Antike und Christentum 83. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2014.Google Scholar
Görgemanns, Herwig, and Karpp, Heinrich, eds. Origenes Vier Bücher von den Prinzipien. Texte zur Forschung 24. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1976.Google Scholar
Grant, Robert M. “The Mystery of Marriage in the Gospel of Philip.” VC 15 (1961): 129–40.Google Scholar
Griffiths, Paul J. Decreation: The Last Things of All Creatures. Waco, TX: Baylor University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Gruber, Gerhard. ΖΩΗ: Wesen, Stufen und Mitteilung des wahren Lebens bei Origenes. Münchener theologische Studien: II. Systematische Abteilung 23. Munich: Hueber, 1962.Google Scholar
Guillaumont, Antoine. Les “Képhalaia gnostica” d’Évagre le Pontique et l’histoire de l’origénisme chez les Grecs et chez les Syriens. Patristica sorbonensia 5. Paris: Éditions du Seuil, 1962.Google Scholar
Hammond Bammel, Caroline P., ed. Der Römerbriefkommentar des Origenes: kritische Ausgabe der Übersetzung Rufins. 3 vols. Aus der Geschichte der lateinischen Bibel 16, 33, 34. Freiburg: Herder, 1990–1998.Google Scholar
Hammond Bammel, Caroline P., “Die fehlehnden Bände des Römerbriefkommentars des Origenes.” In Origeniana Quarta, edited by Lies, Lothar, 16–20. Innsbruck: Tyrolia, 1987.Google Scholar
Harding, E. M. “Origenist Crises.” In The Westminster Handbook to Origen, edited by McGuckin, John Anthony, 162–67. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox, 2004.Google Scholar
Harl, Marguerite. Origène et la fonction révélatrice du Verbe incarné. Patristica sorbonensia 2. Paris: Éditions du Seuil, 1958.Google Scholar
Harris, Murray J. Raised Immortal: Resurrection and Immortality in the New Testament. London: Marshall, Morgan & Scott, 1983.Google Scholar
Hartman, Louis F., and Di Lella, Alexander A.. The Book of Daniel. AB 23. Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1978.Google Scholar
Heimola, Minna. Christian Identity in the Gospel of Philip. Publications of the Finnish Exegetical Society 102. Helsinki: Finnish Exegetical Society, 2011.Google Scholar
Heine, Ronald E. Origen: Scholarship in the Service of the Church. Christian Theology in Context. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Heither, Theresia, ed. Origenes: Römerbriefkommentar. 6 vols. Fontes Christiani 2/1–6. Freiburg: Herder, 1990–1999.Google Scholar
Heither, Theresia, Translatio Religionis: Die Paulusdeutung des Origenes in seinem Kommentar zum Römerbrief. Bonner Beiträge zur Kirchengeschichte 16. Cologne: Böhlau, 1990.Google Scholar
Hennessey, Lawrence R. “A Philosophical Issue in Origen’s Eschatology: The Three Senses of Incorporeality.” In Origeniana Quinta, edited by Daly, Robert J., 373–80. Leuvain: Peeters, 1992.Google Scholar
Hill, Charles E. Regnum Caelorum: Patterns of Millennial Thought in Early Christianity. Oxford: Clarendon, 1992.Google Scholar
Holleman, Joost. Resurrection and Parousia: A Traditio-Historical Study of Paul’s Eschatology in 1 Corinthians 15. NovTSup 84. Leiden: Brill, 1996.Google Scholar
Holsinger-Friesen, Thomas. Irenaeus and Genesis: A Study of Competition in Early Christian Hermeneutics. Journal of Theological Interpretation Supplement 1. Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns, 2009.Google Scholar
Isenberg, Wesley W. “The Gospel of Philip (II,3).” In The Nag Hammadi Library in English, edited by Robinson, James M., 139–60. Leiden: Brill, 1988.Google Scholar
Isenberg, Wesley W. “The Gospel of Philip: Introduction.” In Nag Hammadi Codex II,2–7, edited by Layton, Bentley, 131–39. Leiden: Brill, 1989.Google Scholar
Jacobsen, Anders-Christian Lund. “Origen on the Human Body.” In Origeniana Octava, edited by Perrone, Lorenzo, 649–56. Leuven: Peeters, 2003.Google Scholar
Käsemann, Ernst. Commentary on Romans. Translated by Geoffrey W. Bromiley. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1980.Google Scholar
Kellermann, Ulrich. Auferstanden in den Himmel: 2 Makkabäer 7 und die Auferstehung der Märtyrer. SBS 95. Stuttgart: Katholisches Bibelwerk, 1979.Google Scholar
Kieffer, René. “Résurrection du Christ et résurrection générale.” NRT 103 (1981): 330–44.Google Scholar
Kirk, J. R. Daniel. Unlocking Romans: Resurrection and the Justification of God. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2008.Google Scholar
Kitzler, Petr. “Ex uno homine tota haec animarum redundantia: Ursprung, Entstehung und Weitergabe der inviduellen Seele nach Tertullian.” VC 64 (2010): 353–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koch, Hal. Pronoia und Paideusis: Studien über Origenes und sein Verhältnis zum Platonismus. Berlin and Leipzig: Walter de Gruyter, 1932.Google Scholar
Koetschau, Paul. Origenes Werke, Fünfter Band: De principiis. GCS 22. Leipzig: J. C. Hinrichs, 1913.Google Scholar
Koschorke, Klaus. “Die ‘Namen’ im Philippusevangelium: Beobachtungen zur Auseinandersetzung zwischen gnostischem und kirchlichem Christentum.” ZNW 64 (1973): 307–22.Google Scholar
Krausmüller, Dirk. “Faith and Reason in Late Antiquity: The Perishability Axiom and its Impact on Christian Views about the Origin and Nature of the Soul.” In The Afterlife of the Platonic Soul: Reflections of Platonic Psychology in the Monotheistic Religions, edited by Elkaisy-Freimuth, Maha and Dillon, John M., 47–76. Leiden: Brill, 2009.Google Scholar
Lampe, Peter, and Ritter, Adolf Martin. “Review of Markus Vinzent, Christ’s Resurrection in Early Christianity and the Making of the New Testament.” ZAC 17 (2013): 580–88.Google Scholar
Lassiat, Henri. Promotion de l’homme en Jésus-Christ: D’après Irénée de Lyon, témoin de la tradition des Apôtres. Paris: Mame, 1974.Google Scholar
Layton, Bentley. The Gnostic Treatise on Resurrection from Nag Hammadi. Harvard Dissertations in Religion 12. Missoula, MT: Scholars Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Layton, Bentley. “Prolegomena to the Study of Ancient Gnosticism.” In The Social World of the First Christians: Essays in Honor of Wayne A. Meeks, edited by White, L. Michael and Yarbrough, O. Larry, 334–50. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress, 1995.Google Scholar
Layton, Bentley. “Vision and Revision: A Gnostic View of Resurrection.” In Colloque international sur les textes de Nag Hammadi (Québec, 22–25 août 1978), edited by Barc, Bernard, 190–217. Quebec: Les presses de l’Université Laval, 1981.Google Scholar
Le Boulluec, Alain. “De la croissance selon les Stoïciens à la résurrection selon Origène.” REG 88 (1975): 143–55.Google Scholar
Le Boulluec, Alain. La notion d’hérésie dans la littérature grecque IIe-IIIe siècles, Tome I: De Justin à Irènèe. Paris: Études Augustiniennes, 1985.Google Scholar
Le Boulluec, Alain. “La place de la polémique antignostique dans le Peri Archôn.” In Origeniana, edited by Crouzel, Henri, Lomiento, Gennaro and Rius-Camps, Josep, 47–61. Bari: Istituto di letteratura cristiana antica, Università di Bari, 1975.Google Scholar
Lehtipuu, Outi. The Afterlife Imagery in Luke’s Story of the Rich Man and Lazarus. NovTSup 123. Leiden: Brill, 2007.Google Scholar
Lehtipuu, Outi. Debates over the Resurrection of the Dead: Constructing Early Christian Identity. Oxford Early Christian Studies. New York: Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Lehtipuu, Outi. “‘Flesh and Blood Cannot Inherit the Kingdom of God:’ The Transformation of the Flesh in the Early Christian Debates Concerning Resurrection.” In Metamorphoses: Resurrection, Body, and Transformative Practices in Early Christianity, edited by Seim, Turid Karlsen and Økland, Jorunn, 147–68. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2009.Google Scholar
Lewis, Nicola Denzey. “Apolytrosis as Ritual and Sacrament: Determining a Ritual Context for Death in Second-Century Marcosian Valentinianism.” JECS 17 (2009): 525–61.Google Scholar
Lindemann, Andreas. Paulus im ältesten Christentum: Das Bild des Apostels und die Rezeption der paulinischen Theologie in der frühchristlichen Literatur bis Marcion. BHT 58. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1979.Google Scholar
Long, A. A., and Sedley, D. N.. The Hellenistic Philosophers, Volume 1: Translations of the Principal Sources, with Philosophical Commentary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Lundhaug, Hugo. Images of Rebirth: Cognitive Poetics and Transformational Soteriology in the Gospel of Philip and the Exegesis of the Soul. NHS 73. Leiden: Brill, 2010.Google Scholar
Lundhaug, Hugo. “‘These Are the Symbols and Likenesses of the Resurrection’: Conceptualizations of Death and Transformation in the Treatise on the Resurrection (NHC I,4).” In Metamorphoses: Resurrection, Body, and Transformative Practices in Early Christianity, edited by Seim, Turid Karlsen and Økland, Jorunn. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2009.Google Scholar
Lyman, J. Rebecca. Christology and Cosmology: Models of Divine Activity in Origen, Eusebius, and Athanasius. Oxford: Clarendon, 1993.Google Scholar
Malinine, Michel, Puech, Henri-Charles, Quispel, Guilles, and Till, Walter. De resurrectione (Epistula ad Rheginum). Zurich: Rascher, 1963.Google Scholar
Marjanen, Antti, and Luomanen, Petri, eds. A Companion to Second-Century Christian ‘Heretics’. Supplements to Vigiliae Christianae 76. Leiden: Brill, 2005.Google Scholar
Markschies, Christoph. “Origenes und die Kommentierung des paulinischen Römerbriefs – einige Bemerkungen zur Rezeption von antiken Kommentartechniken im Christentum des dritten Jahrhunderts und ihrer Vorgeschichte.” In Crossroad of Cultures: Studies in liturgy and patristics in honor of Gabriele Winkler, edited by Feulner, Hans-Jürgen, Velkovska, Elena and Taft, Robert F., 462–75. Rome: Pontificio instituto orientale, 2000.Google Scholar
McGuckin, John A. “The Changing Forms of Jesus.” In Origeniana Quarta, edited by Lies, Lothar, 215–22. Innsbruck: Tyrolia Verlag, 1987.Google Scholar
McGuckin, John A. “The Life of Origen (ca. 186–255).” In The Westminster Handbook to Origen, edited by McGuckin, John Anthony, 1–23. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox, 2004.Google Scholar
Ménard, Jacques-É. “L’épître à Rhèginos (le De resurrectione): sa notion de résurrection.” In Acts of the Second International Congress of Coptic Study, Roma, 22–26 September 1980, edited by Orlandi, Tito and Wisse, Frederik, 167–77. Rome: C.I.M., 1985.Google Scholar
Ménard, Jacques-É. L’Évangile selon Philippe: introduction, texte, traduction, commentaire. Paris: Letouzey & Ané, 1967.Google Scholar
Ménard, Jacques-É. “La notion de ‘résurrection’ dans l’Epître à Rhèginos.” In Essays on the Nag Hammadi Texts in Honor of Pahor Labib, edited by Krause, Martin, 110–24. Leiden: Brill, 1975.Google Scholar
Molitor, Heinrich. Die Auferstehung der Christen und Nichtchristen nach dem Apostel Paulus. NTAbh 16.1. Münster: Aschendorff, 1933.Google Scholar
Morgan, Robert. “The Significance of ‘Paulinism’.” In Paul and Paulinism: Essays in Honor of C. K. Barrett, edited by Hooker, M. D. and Wilson, S. G., 320–38. London: SPCK, 1982.Google Scholar
Moser, Maureen Beyer. Teacher of Holiness: The Holy Spirit in Origen’s Commentary on the Epistle to the Romans. Gorgias Dissertations 17. Piscataway, NJ: Gorgias, 2005.Google Scholar
Musurillo, Herbert, ed. Méthode d’Olympe: Le Banquet. SC 95. Paris: Éditions du Cerf, 1963.Google Scholar
Musurillo, Herbert, ed. St. Methodius: The Symposium, a Treatise on Chastity. ACW 27. London: Longmans, Green, 1958.Google Scholar
Nasrallah, Laura. An Ecstasy of Folly: Prophecy and Authority in Early Christianity. HTS 52. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Nautin, Pierre. Lettres et écrivains chrétiens des IIe et IIIe siècles. Paris: Éditions du Cerf, 1961.Google Scholar
Nickelsburg, George W. E. Jewish Literature between the Bible and the Mishnah. 2nd ed. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress, 2005.Google Scholar
Nickelsburg, George W. E. Resurrection, Immortality, and Eternal Life in Intertestamental Judaism and Early Christianity. Expanded ed. HTS 56. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Niklas, Tobias. “Resurrection – Judgment – Punishment: Apocalypse of Peter 4.” In Resurrection of the Dead: Biblical Traditions in Dialogue, edited by van Oyen, Geert and Shepherd, Tom, 461–74. Leuven: Peeters, 2012.Google Scholar
Noormann, Rolf. Irenäus als Paulusinterpret: Zur Rezeption und Wirkung der paulinischen und deuteropaulinischen Briefe im Werk des Irenäus von Lyon. WUNT 2/66. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr, 1994.Google Scholar
Norris, Richard A. “Irenaeus’ Use of Paul in His Polemic Against the Gnostics.” In Paul and the Legacies of Paul, edited by Babcock, William S., 79–98. Dallas, TX: Southern Methodist University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Pagels, Elaine. “The Controversy over Christ’s Resurrection: Historical Event or Symbol?” In The Gnostic Gospels, 3–27. New York: Random House, 1979.Google Scholar
Pagels, Elaine. “Ritual in the Gospel of Philip.” In The Nag Hammadi Library after Fifty Years: Proceedings of the 1995 Society of Biblical Literature Commemoration, edited by Turner, John D. and McGuire, Anne, 280–91. Leiden: Brill, 1997.Google Scholar
Pannenberg, Wolfhart. Systematic Theology. Translated by Geoffrey W. Bromiley. 3 vols. London: T & T Clark, 1994.Google Scholar
Patterson, Lloyd G. Methodius of Olympus: Divine Sovereignty, Human Freedom, and Life in Christ. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Peel, Malcolm L. The Epistle to Rheginos: A Valentinian Letter on the Resurrection. NTL. London: SCM, 1969.Google Scholar
Peel, Malcolm L. “The Treatise on the Resurrection.” In Nag Hammadi Codex I (The Jung Codex): Introductions, Texts, Translations, Indices, edited by Attridge, Harold W., 123–57. Leiden: Brill, 1985.Google Scholar
Peel, Malcolm L. “The Treatise on the Resurrection.” In Nag Hammadi Library Codex I (The Jung Codex): Notes, edited by Attridge, Harold W., 137–215. Leiden: Brill, 1985.Google Scholar
Peel, Malcolm L. “Treatise on the Resurrection (I,4).” In The Nag Hammadi Library in English, edited by Robinson, James M.. Leiden: Brill, 1996.Google Scholar
Pépin, Jean. “Platonisme et Stoïcisme dans le « De autexousio » de Méthode d’Olympe.” In Forma Futuri: Studi in onore del Cardinale Michele Pellegrino, 126–44. Turin: Bottega d’Erasmo, 1975.Google Scholar
Perkins, Pheme. Resurrection: New Testament Witness and Contemporary Reflection. Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1984.Google Scholar
Pierre, Marie-Joseph. “L’âme dans l’anthropologie d’Origène.” Proche-Orient chrétien 34 (1984): 21–65.Google Scholar
Price, Richard, ed. The Acts of the Council of Constantinople of 553 with related texts on the Three Chapters Controversy. 2 vols. Translated Texts for Historians 51. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Puech, Émil. La croyance des esséniens en la vie future: immortalité, résurrection, vie éternelle? 2 vols. Ebib, n.s., 21. Paris: Librairie Lecoffre, 1993.Google Scholar
Rahner, Hugo. “Taufe und geistliches Leben bei Origenes.” Zeitschrift für Aszese und Mystik 7 (1932): 205–23.Google Scholar
Räisänen, Heikki. “Resurrection for Punishment? The Fate of the Unrighteous in Early Christianity and in ‘New Testament Theology’.” In Resurrection of the Dead: Biblical Traditions in Dialogue, edited by van Oyen, Geert and Shepherd, Tom, 361–81. Leuven: Peeters, 2012.Google Scholar
Ramelli, Ilaria L. E. The Christian Doctrine of Apokatastasis: A Critical Assessment from the New Testament to Eriugena. Supplements to Vigiliae Christianae 120. Leiden: Brill, 2013.Google Scholar
Ramsbotham, A. “The Commentary of Origen on the Epistle to the Romans. II.” JTS 13 (1912): 357–68.Google Scholar
Rankin, David. Tertullian and the Church. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Reijners, Gerardus Q. Das Wort vom Kreuz: Kreuzes- und Erlösungssymbolik bei Origenes. Bonner Beiträge zur Kirchengeschichte 13. Cologne: Böhlau, 1983.Google Scholar
Rensberger, David K. “As the Apostle Teaches: The Development of the Use of Paul’s Letters in Second-Century Christianity.” Ph.D. thesis, Yale University, 1981.Google Scholar
Robinson, James M. “Jesus from Easter to Valentinus (Or to the Apostles’ Creed).” JBL 101 (1982): 5–37.Google Scholar
Rombs, Ronnie J. “A Note on the Status of Origen’s De Principiis in English.” VC 61 (2007): 21–29.Google Scholar
Roukema, Riemer. The Diversity of Laws in Origen’s Commentary on Romans. Amsterdam: Free University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Adelin. “L’éternité des peines de l’enfer et l’immortalité naturelle de l’âme selon saint Irénée.” NRT 99 (1977): 834–64.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Adelin, and Doutreleau, Louis, eds. Irénée de Lyon: Contre les hérésies. SC 100, 152, 153, 210, 211, 263, 264, 293, 294. Paris: Éditions du Cerf, 1965–1982.Google Scholar
Scheck, Thomas P., ed. Origen: Commentary on the Epistle to the Romans. 2 vols. FC 103–104. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Schenke, Hans-Martin. Das Philippus-Evangelium (Nag-Hammadi-Codex II,3): Neu herausgegeben, übersetzt und erklärt von Hans-Martin Schenke. TU 143. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 1997.Google Scholar
Scherer, Jean. Le commentaire d’Origène sur Rom. III.5 – V.7 d’après les extraits du Papyrus no. 88748 du Musée du Caire et les fragments de la Philocalie et du Vaticanus Gr. 762. Essai de reconstitution du texte et de la pensée des tomes V et VI du ‘Commentaire sur l’Épître aux Romains’. Edited by Garnot, Jean Sainte Fare. Bibliothèque d’Étude 27. Cairo: Institut français d’Archéologie Orientale, 1957.Google Scholar
Schlatter, Adolf. Die Theologie des Judentums nach dem Bericht des Josefus. Beiträge zur Förderung christlicher Theologie. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann, 1932.Google Scholar
Schnackenburg, Rudolf. The Gospel according to St John. Translated by Kevin Smyth, Cecily Hastings, Francis McDonagh, David Smith, Richard Foley S.J. and G. A. Kon. 3 vols. New York: Crossroad, 1982–1990.Google Scholar
Schreiner, Thomas R. New Testament Theology: Magnifying God in Christ. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2008.Google Scholar
Schweitzer, Albert. The Mysticism of Paul the Apostle. Translated by William Montgomery. New York: Henry Holt, 1931.Google Scholar
Scott, Alan B. “Opposition and Concession: Origen’s Relationship to Valentinianism.” In Origeniana Quinta, edited by Daly, Robert J., 79–84. Leuven: Peeters, 1992.Google Scholar
Scott, Alan B. Origen and the Life of the Stars: A History of an Idea. Oxford Early Christian Studies. Oxford: Clarendon, 1991.Google Scholar
Scott, Mark S. M. Journey Back to God: Origen on the Problem of Evil. New York: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Segal, Alan F. Life After Death: A History of the Afterlife in the Religions of the West. New York: Doubleday, 2004.Google Scholar
Segelberg, Eric. “The Coptic-Gnostic Gospel According to Philip and its Sacramental System.” Numen 7 (1960): 189–200.Google Scholar
Setzer, Claudia. Resurrection of the Body in Early Judaism and Early Christianity: Doctrine, Community, and Self-Definition. Boston: Brill Academic, 2004.Google Scholar
Slusser, Michael. “The Heart of Irenaeus’s Theology.” In Irenaeus: Life, Scripture, Legacy, edited by Parvis, Sara and Foster, Paul, 133–39. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress, 2012.Google Scholar
Smith, J. Warren. Passion and Paradise: Human and Divine Emotion in the Thought of Gregory of Nyssa. New York: Crossroad, 2004.Google Scholar
Steenberg, Matthew C. “Children in Paradise: Adam and Eve as ‘Infants’ in Irenaeus of Lyons.” JECS 12 (2004): 1–22.Google Scholar
Steenberg, Matthew C. Of God and Man: Theology as Anthropology from Irenaeus to Athanasius. London: T & T Clark, 2009.Google Scholar
Steenberg, Matthew C. “Sinful Nature as Second Nature in Tertullian of Carthage.” SP 46 (2010): 17–19.Google Scholar
Stemberger, Günter. Der Leib der Auferstehung: Studien zur Anthropologie und Eschatologie des palästinischen Judentums im neutestamentlichen Zeitalter (ca. 170 v. Chr. – 100 n. Chr.). AnBib 56. Rome: Biblical Institute Press, 1972.Google Scholar
Strawbridge, Jennifer R. The Pauline Effect: The Use of the Pauline Epistles by Early Christian Writers. Studies of the Bible and Its Reception 5. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2015.Google Scholar
Tabbernee, William. “The World to Come: Tertullian’s Christian Eschatology.” In Tertullian and Paul, edited by Still, Todd D. and Wilhite, David E., 259–77. New York: T & T Clark, 2013.Google Scholar
Tannehill, Robert C. Dying and Rising with Christ: A Study in Pauline Theology. BZNW 32. Berlin: Alfred Töpelmann, 1967.Google Scholar
Tappenden, Frederick S. Resurrection in Paul: Cognition, Metaphor, and Transformation. Early Christianity and its Literature 19. Atlanta, GA: SBL Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Thackeray, H. St. J., ed. Josephus: The Jewish War, Volume I: Books 1–2. LCL 203. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1927.Google Scholar
Thomassen, Einar. “How Valentinian is the Gospel of Philip?” In The Nag Hammadi Library after Fifty Years: Proceedings of the 1995 Society of Biblical Literature Commemoration, edited by Turner, John D. and McGuire, Anne, 251–79. Leiden: Brill, 1997.Google Scholar
Thomassen, Einar. The Spiritual Seed: The Church of the ‘Valentinians’. NHS 60. Leiden: Brill, 2006.Google Scholar
Thomassen, Einar. “Valentinian Ideas About Salvation as Transformation.” In Metamorphoses: Resurrection, Body, and Transformative Practices in Early Christianity, edited by Seim, Turid Karlsen and Økland, Jorunn. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2009.Google Scholar
Trigg, J. W. “A Fresh Look at Origen’s Understanding of Baptism.” SP 17 (1982): 959–65.Google Scholar
Turner, Martha Lee. “The Coherence of the Gospel According to Philip.” In The Nag Hammadi Library after Fifty Years: Proceedings of the 1995 Society of Biblical Literature Commemoration, edited by Turner, John D. and McGuire, Anne, 223–50. Leiden: Brill, 1997.Google Scholar
Turner, Martha Lee. The Gospel According to Philip: The Sources and Coherence of an Early Christian Collection. NHS 38. Leiden: Brill, 1996.Google Scholar
Tzamalikos, Panayiotis. Origen: Cosmology and Ontology of Time. Supplements to Vigiliae Christianae 77. Leiden: Brill, 2006.Google Scholar
Tzamalikos, Panayiotis. Origen: Philosophy of History & Eschatology. Supplements to Vigiliae Christianae 85. Leiden: Brill, 2007.Google Scholar
Unger, Dominic J., and Dillon, John J., eds. St. Irenaeus of Lyons Against the Heresies (Book 1). ACW 55. New York: Paulist, 1992.Google Scholar
Vaillant, A., ed. Le De autexousio de Méthode d’Olympe. PO 22.5. Paris: Firmin-Didot, 1930.Google Scholar
van Eijk, A. H. C. “The Gospel of Philip and Clement of Alexandria: Gnostic and Ecclesiastical Theology on the Resurrection and the Eucharist.” VC 25 (1971): 94–120.Google Scholar
van Eijk, A. H. C. “‘Only that can rise which has previously fallen’: The History of a Formula.” JTS (n.s.) 22 (1971): 517–29.Google Scholar
Vinzent, Markus. Christ’s Resurrection in Early Christianity and the Making of the New Testament. Farnham: Ashgate, 2011.Google Scholar
Vogt, Hermann J., ed. Origenes: Der Kommentar zum Evangelium nach Matthäus. 3 vols. Bibliothek der Griechischen Literatur 30. Stuttgart: Anton Hiersemann, 1990.Google Scholar
Waszink, J. H. “Observations on Tertullian’s Treatise against Hermogenes.” VC 9 (1955): 129–47.Google Scholar
Waszink, J. H. ed. Quinti Septimi Florentis Tertulliani De Anima. Supplements to Vigiliae Christianae 100. Leiden: Brill, 2010.Google Scholar
Watson, Francis. “Resurrection and the Limits of Paulinism.” In The Word Leaps the Gap: Essays on Scripture and Theology in Honor of Richard B. Hays, edited by Wagner, J. Ross, Rowe, C. Kavin and Grieb, A. Katherine, 452–71. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2008.Google Scholar
Wedderburn, A. J. M. Baptism and Resurrection: Studies in Pauline Theology against its Graeco-Roman Background. WUNT 44. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck), 1987.Google Scholar
Werner, Johannes. Der Paulinismus des Irenaeus: Eine kirchen- und dogmengeschichtliche Untersuchung über das Verhältnis des Irenaeus zu der paulinischen Briefsammlung und Theologie. TU 6. Leipzig: J. C. Hinrichs, 1889.Google Scholar
White, Benjamin L. Remembering Paul: Ancient and Modern Contests over the Image of the Apostle. New York: Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Wilckens, Ulrich. Auferstehung: Das biblische Auferstehungszeugnis historisch untersucht und erklärt. Themen der Theologie 4. Stuttgart: Kreuz-Verlag, 1970.Google Scholar
Wilhite, David E. “The Spirit of Prophecy: Tertullian’s Pauline Pneumatology.” In Tertullian and Paul, edited by Still, Todd D. and Wilhite, David E., 45–71. New York: T & T Clark, 2013.Google Scholar
Williams, Frank, ed. The Panarion of Epiphanius of Salamis, Books II and III. De Fide. 2nd ed. NHS 79. Leiden: Brill, 2013.Google Scholar
Williams, Michael A. “Realized Eschatology in the Gospel of Philip.” ResQ 14 (1971): 1–17.Google Scholar
Williams, Michael A. Rethinking “Gnosticism”: An Argument for Dismantling a Dubious Category. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Wilson, R. McL. The Gospel of Philip: Translated from the Coptic text, with an Introduction and Commentary. London: A. R. Mowbray, 1962.Google Scholar
Wingren, Gustaf. Man and the Incarnation: A Study in the Biblical Theology of Irenaeus. Translated by Ross Mackenzie. Philadelphia: Muhlenberg Press, 1959.Google Scholar
Wright, N. T. Paul and the Faithfulness of God. Christian Origins and the Question of God 4. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress, 2013.Google Scholar
Wright, N. T. The Resurrection of the Son of God. Christian Origins and the Question of God 3. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress, 2003.Google Scholar