Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-6d856f89d9-76ns8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T04:50:37.712Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Introduction: Reuse, Renovation, Reiteration

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 September 2018

Diana Y. Ng
Affiliation:
University of Michigan, Dearborn
Molly Swetnam-Burland
Affiliation:
College of William and Mary, Virginia
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Reuse and Renovation in Roman Material Culture
Functions, Aesthetics, Interpretations
, pp. 1 - 23
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbe, M. 2010. “Recent Research on the Painting and Gilding of Roman Marble Statuary at Aphrodisias.” In Circumlitio: The Polychromy of Antique and Medieval Sculpture, edited by Brickmann, V., Primavesi, O., and Hollein, M., 277–89. Munich: Hirmer.Google Scholar
Alzinger, W. 1974. Augusteische Architektur in Ephesus, 2 vols. Sonderschriften Österreichischen Archäologischen Institut in Wien 16. Vienna: Österreichisches Archäologisches Institut.Google Scholar
Appadurai, A. 1986. “Introduction: Commodities and the Politics of Value.” In The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective, edited by Appadurai, A., 363. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Aurenhammer, M. 1990. Die Skulpturen von Ephesos, Bildwerke aus Stein, Idealplastik I. Forschungen in Ephesos. Vienna: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
Avisseau-Broustet, M., Colonna, C., and Lapatin, K., 2014. “The Berthouville Treasure: A Discovery ‘As Marvelous as It was Unexpected’.” In The Berthouville Silver Treasure and Roman Luxury, edited by Lapatin, K., 769. Los Angeles: The J. Paul Getty Museum.Google Scholar
Bammer, A. 1968–71. “Beiträge zur Ephesischen Architektur.” ÖJh 49:140.Google Scholar
Bammer, A. 1972–5. “Architektur.” ÖJhBeibl 50:381406.Google Scholar
Bammer, A. 1976–7. “Das Denkmal des C. Sextilius Pollio in Ephesos.” ÖJhBeibl 51:7792.Google Scholar
Bammer, A. 1978–80. “Elemente Flavisch-Trajanischer Architekturfassaden aus Ephesos.” ÖJh 52:6790.Google Scholar
Barker, S. 2012. “Marble Salvaging during the Roman Period.” In Interdisciplinary Studies on Ancient Stone: Proceedings of the IX Association for the Study of Marbles and Other Stones in Antiquity (ASMOSIA) Conference (Tarragona 2009), edited by Gutiérrez Garcia-M, A.., Lapuente Mercadal, P. and Rodà de Llanza, I., 2230. Tarragona: Institut Català d’Arqueologia ClàssicaGoogle Scholar
Barker, S. and Ward, C.. 2015. “Roman Stone-Carvers and Re-Carving: Ingenuity in Recycling.” In Interdisciplinary Studies on Ancient Stone. ASMOSIA X. Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference of ASMOSIA Association for the Study of Marble and Other Stones in Antiquity, Rome, 21–26 May 2012, edited by Gasparini, E. and Pensabene, P., 765–78. Rome: “L’Erma” di Bretschneider.Google Scholar
Belardi, G. and Carbonara, G., eds. 2006. Il Pantheon: storia, tecnica, e restauro. Viterbo: Betagamma.Google Scholar
Berenson, B. 1954. The Arch of Constantine: or, The Decline of Form. London: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
Bosman, L. 2004. The Power of Tradition: Spolia in the Architecture of Saint-Peter’s in the Vatican. Hilversum: Uitgeverij Verloren.Google Scholar
Brenk, B. 1987. “Spolia from Constantine to Charlemagne: Aesthetics versus Ideology.Dumbarton Oaks Papers 41:103–9.Google Scholar
Brilliant, R. and Kinney, D., eds. 2011. Reuse Value: Spolia and Appropriation in Art and Architecture from Constantine to Sherrie Levine. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Bricault, L. 2005. Recueil des inscriptions concernant les cultes isiaques (RICIS), 3 vols. MémAcInscr 31. Paris: de Boccard.Google Scholar
Cline, L. K. 2015. “Painted Pavements: Illusion and Imitation at Villa A (‘of Poppaea’) at Oplontis.” In Beyond Iconography: Materials, Methods, and Meaning in Ancient Surface Decoration, edited byLepinksi, S. and McFadden, S., 205–18. Selected Papers on Ancient Art and Architecture 1. Boston, MA: Archaeological Institute of America.Google Scholar
Claridge, A. 1988. “Roman Statuary and the Supply of Statuary Marble.” In Ancient Marble Quarrying and Trade, edited by Fant, J. C., 139–55. BAR International Series 453. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports.Google Scholar
Claridge, A. 2010. Rome: An Oxford Archaeological Guide. Second edition. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Crielaard, J. P. 2003. “The Cultural Biography of Material Goods in Homer’s Epics.” Gaia: revue interdisciplinaire sur la Grèce Archaïque 7:4962.Google Scholar
Cubitt, G. 2007. History and Memory. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Deichmann, F. W. 1975. Die Spolien in der spätantiken Architektur. Munich: Verlag der Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
Dorl-Klingenschmid, C. 2001. Prunkbrunnen in Kleinasiatischen Städten: Funktion im Kontext. Munich: Dr. Friedrich Pfeil.Google Scholar
Erll, A. and Nünning, A., eds. 2010. A Companion to Cultural Memory Studies. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Flower, H. 1998.“Re-thinking Damnatio Memoriae: The Case of Cn. Calpurnius Piso Pater in ad 20.” ClAnt 17.2:155–87.Google Scholar
Flower, H. 2001. “A Tale of Two Monuments: Domitian, Trajan, and Some Praetorians at Puteoli (AE 1973, 137).” AJA 105.4:625–48.Google Scholar
Flower, H. 2006. The Art of Forgetting: Disgrace and Oblivion in Roman Political Culture. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Gabrici, E. 1919. “Regione I. VI Pozzuoli.” NdSc ser. 5, 6:212–15.Google Scholar
Galinsky, K. 2008. “Recarved Imperial Portraits: Nuances and Wider Contexts.” MAAR 53:125.Google Scholar
Galinsky, K. ed. 2014. Memoria Romana: Memory in Rome and Rome in Memory. MAAR Suppl. 10. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Galinsky, K. ed. 2016. Memory in Ancient Rome and Early Christianity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gautier, G. 2014. “Phiale Depicting Omphale.” In The Berthouville Silver Treasure and Roman Luxury, edited by Lapatin, K., 65–6. Los Angeles: The J. Paul Getty Museum.Google Scholar
Gee, R. 2015. “Fourth Style Workshop Deployment and Movement Patterns at Villa A (‘of Poppaea’) at Oplontis.” In Beyond Iconography: Materials, Methods, and Meaning in Ancient Surface Decoration, edited by Lepinksi, S. and McFadden, S., 115–36. Selected Papers on Ancient Art and Architecture 1. Boston, MA: Archaeological Institute of America.Google Scholar
Gosden, C. and Marshall, Y.. 1999. “The Cultural Biography of Objects.” WorldArch 31. 2:169–78.Google Scholar
Greenhalgh, M. 2009. Marble Past, Monumental Present: Building with Antiquities in the Mediaeval Mediterranean. Medieval Mediterranean 80. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Halbwachs, M. 1925. Les cadres sociaux de la mémoire. Paris: F. Alcan.Google Scholar
Halbwachs, M. 1941. La topographie légendaire des évangiles en terre sainte. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Halbwachs, M. 1950. La mémoire collective. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Halbwachs, M. 1992. On Collective Memory. Edited and translated by Coser, L. A.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hall, E. 1913. “A Roman Relief from Puteoli.” University of Pennsylavnia Museum Journal 4:142–6.Google Scholar
Heberdey, R. 1912. “IX. Vorläufiger Bereicht über die Grabungen in Ephesos.” ÖJhBeibl 15:157–82.Google Scholar
Hetland, L. 2007Dating the Pantheon.” JRA 20:95112.Google Scholar
Holleran, C. 2012. Shopping in Ancient Rome: The Retail Trade in the Late Republic and the Principate. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hoskins, J. 2006. “Agency, Biography and Objects.” In Handbook of Material Culture, edited by Tilley, C., Keane, W., Küchler, S., Rowlands, M., and Spyer, P., 7485. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Irwin-Zarecka, I. 1994. Frames of Remembrance: The Dynamics of Collective Memory. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Jenkyns, R. 2014. “The Memory of Rome in Rome.” In Memoria Romana: Memory in Rome and Rome in Memory, edited by Galinsky, K., 1526. MAAR Suppl. 10. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Joy, J. 2009. “Reinvigorating Object Biography: Reproducing the Drama of Object Lives.” WorldArch 41. 4:540–56.Google Scholar
Kähler, H. 1951. “Der Trajansbogen in Puteli.” In Studies Presented to D. M. Robinson I, edited by Mylonas, G., 430–39. St. Louis, MO: Washington University.Google Scholar
Kalinowski, A. 2002. “The Vedii Antonini: Aspects of Patronage and Benefaction in Second-Century Ephesos.” Phoenix 56.1/2:109–49.Google Scholar
Keil, J. 1943. “Drei neue Inschriften aus Ephesos.” ÖJhBeibl 35:101–8.Google Scholar
Keil, J. 1957. Ephesos, ein Führer durch die Ruinenstätte und ihre Geschichte. Vienna: Österreichisches Archäologisches Institut.Google Scholar
Kopytoff, I. 1986. “The Cultural Biography of Things: Commoditization as Process.” In The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective, edited by Appadurai, A., 6491. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kristensen, T. M. 2013. Making and Breaking the Gods: Christian Responses to Pagan Sculpture in Late Antiquity. Aarhus Studies in Mediterranean Antiquity 12. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press.Google Scholar
Kristensen, T. M. and Stirling, L., eds. 2016. The Afterlife of Greek and Roman Sculpture: Late Antique Responses and Practices. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Lapatin, K., ed. 2014. The Berthouville Silver Treasure and Roman Luxury. Los Angeles: The J. Paul Getty Museum.Google Scholar
Longfellow, B. 2011. Roman Imperialism and Civic Patronage: Form, Meaning, and Ideology in Monumental Fountain Complexes. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Marder, T. and Wilson Jones, M.. 2015. The Pantheon: from Antiquity to the Present. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Marlowe, E. 2006. “Framing the Sun: The Arch of Constantine and the Roman Cityscape.Art Bulletin 88.2:223–42.Google Scholar
Marlowe, E. 2013. Shaky Ground: Context, Connoisseurship and the History of Roman Art. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Miltner, F. 1956. “XXI. Vorläufiger Bericht über die Ausgrabungen in Ephesos.” ÖJhBeibl 43:164.Google Scholar
Miltner, F. 1960. “XXIV. Vorläufiger Bericht über die Ausgrabungen in Ephesos.” ÖJhBeibl 45:174.Google Scholar
Nelson, R. S. 2003. “Appropriation.” In Critical Terms for Art History, edited by Nelson, R. and Shiff, R., 160–73. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ng, D. 2015. “Commemoration and Élite Benefaction of Buildings and Spectacles in the Roman World.” JRS 105:101–23.Google Scholar
Ng, D. 2016. “Monuments, Memory, and Status Recognition in Roman Asia Minor.” In Memory in Ancient Rome and Early Christianity, edited by Galinsky, K., 235–60. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nora, P. 1989. “Between Memory and History: Les Lieux de Memoire.” Translated by M. Roudebush. Representations 26 (Spring):724.Google Scholar
Nora, P. 1996. Realms of Memory. Edited by Kritzman, L. D. and translated by A. Goldhammer. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Nora, P. 2001. Rethinking France: Les lieux de mémoire. Vol. 1: The State. Translated by M. Trouille under the direction of D. Jordan. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Olick, J. 2010. “From Collective Memory to the Sociology of Mnemonic Practices and Products.” In A Companion to Cultural Memory Studies, edited by Erll, A. and Nunning, A., 151–61. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Olick, J., Vinitzky-Seroussi, V., and Levy, D., eds. 2011. The Collective Memory Reader. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Papadopoulos, J. and Smithson, E.. 2002. “The Cultural Biography of a Cycladic Geometric Amphora: Islanders in Athens and the Prehistory of the Metics.” Hesperia 71.2:149–99.Google Scholar
Pollini, J. 2010. “Recutting Roman Portraits: Problems in Interpretation and New Technology in Finding Possible Solutions.” MAAR 55:2344.Google Scholar
Pollini, J. 2013. “The Archaeology of Destruction: Christians, Images of Classical Antiquity, and Some Problems of Interpretation.” Chaos et Kosmos 14:129.Google Scholar
Pont, A.-V. 2008. “Évergètes bâtisseurs à Aphrodisias au haut-empire.” In Pathways to Power: Civic Elites in the Eastern Part of the Roman Empire: Proceedings of the International Workshop held at Athens, Scuola archeologica italiana di Atene, 19 December 2005, edited by Rizakes, A. D. and Camia, F., 181208. Athens: Scuola archeological italiana di Atene.Google Scholar
Prusac, M. 2010. From Face to Face: Recarving of Roman Portraits and the Late-Antique Portrait Arts. Monumenta Graeca et Romana 18. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Quatember, U. 2007. “Neue Zeiten – Alte Sitten? Ti. Claudius Aristion und seine Bauten in Ephesos.” In Neue Zeiten – Neue Sitten. Zu Rezeption und Integration römischen und italischen Kulturguts in Kleinasien, edited by Meyer, M., 101–13. Wiener Forschungen zur Archäologie 12. Vienna: Phoibos Verlag.Google Scholar
Quatember, U. 2008. “Der Brunnen an der Straße zum Magnesischen Tor in Ephesos.” ÖJh 77:219–64.Google Scholar
Richard, J. 2011. “In the Élites’ Toolkit. Decoding the Initiative and Reference System behind the Investment in the Architecture and Decoration of Roman Nymphaea.” FACTA 5:65100.Google Scholar
Romano, I. B. 2006. Classical Sculpture: Catalogue of the Cypriot, Greek, and Roman Stone Sculpture in the University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology. University Museum Monograph 125. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology.Google Scholar
Rossington, M. and Whitehead, A., eds. 2007. Theories of Memory: A Reader. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Scherrer, P. 2006. “Die Fernwasserversorgung von Ephesos in der römischen Kaiserzeit, Synopse der epigraphischen Quellen.” In Twelfth International Congress on the History of Water Management and Hydraulic Engineering in the Mediterranean Region, October 2–10, 2004, edited by Wiplinger, G., 4560. Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar
Scherrer, P. 2007. “Der conventus civium Romanorum und kaiserliche Freigelassene als Bauherren in Ephesos.” In Neue Zeiten – Neue Sitten. Zu Rezeption und Integration römischen italischen Kulturguts in Kleinasien, edited by Meyer, M., 6375. Wiener Forschungen zur Archäologie 12. Vienna: Phoibos Verlag.Google Scholar
Shaya, J. 2013. “The Public Life of Monuments: The Summi Viri of the Forum of Augustus.” AJA 117.1:83110.Google Scholar
Sieveking, J. 1919. “Römisches Soldatenrelief.” SBMunch 6:18.Google Scholar
Smith, R. R. R. 2007. “Statuary Life in the Hadrianic Baths at Aphrodisias, ad 100–600: Local Context and Historical Meaning.” In Statuen in der Spätantike, edited by Witschel, Christian and Bauer, Franz Alto, 203–36. Spätantike – Frühes Christentum – Byzanz. Kunst im ersten Jahrtausend, Reihe B: Studien und Perspektiven 23. Wiesbaden: Reichert Verlag.Google Scholar
Smith, R. R. R. and Ward-Perkins, B., eds. 2016. The Last Statues of Antiquity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Strocka, V. M. 1989. “Zeus, Marnas und Klaseas: ephesische Brunnenfiguren von 93 n. Chr.” In Festschrift für Jale Inan, edited by Basgelen, N. and Lugal, M., 7792. Istanbul: Arkeoloji ve Sanat Yayınları.Google Scholar
Swetnam-Burland, M. 2010. “Aegyptus Redacta: The Egyptian Obelisk in the Augustan Campus Martius.” Art Bulletin 92.3:135–53.Google Scholar
Swetnam-Burland, M. 2015a. Egypt in Italy: Visions of Egypt in Roman Imperial Culture. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Swetnam-Burland, M. 2015b. “Monuments in Egyptian Style.” In The Oxford Handbook of Roman Sculpture, edited by Friedland, Elise and Sobocinski, Melanie, 307–22. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Swetnam-Burland, M. Forthcoming. “Material Evidence and the Isiac Cults: Art and Experience in the Sanctuary.” In The Agents of Isiac Cults: Proceedings of the VIth Conference of Isis Studies (Erfurt, May 6–8; Liège, September 23–24, 2013). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Swift, E. 2012. “Object Biography, Re-use and Recycling in the Late to Post-Roman Transition Period and Beyond: Rings Made from Romano-British Bracelets.” Britannia 43:167215.Google Scholar
Thomas, W. and Witschel, C.. 1992. “Constructing Reconstruction: Claim and Reality of Roman Rebuilding Inscriptions from the Latin West.PBSR 60:135–77.Google Scholar
Thür, H. 1997. “Girlandensarkophag und Porträt eines Kaiserpriesters im Fund- und Primärkontext: Bestandteile eines Ehrengrabes am Embolos?” In “–Und verschönerte die Stadt–”: ein ephesischer Priester des Kaiserkultes in seinem Umfeld, edited by Thür, H., 6575. Sonderschriften des Österreichischen Archäologischen Institutes 27. Vienna: Phoibos Verlag.Google Scholar
Varner, E., ed. 2000. From Caligula to Constantine: Tyranny and Transformation in Roman Portraiture. Atlanta, GA: Michael C. Carlos Museum.Google Scholar
Voorhis, J. A. van 2012. “The Working and Re-working of Marble Sculpture at the Sculptor’s Workshop at Aphrodisias.” In Ateliers and Artisans in Roman Art and Archaeology, edited by Poulsen, B. and Kristensen, T. M., 3854. Journal of Roman Archaeology Supplementary Series 92. Portsmourth, RI: Journal of Roman Archaeology.Google Scholar
Waddell, G. 2008. Creating the Pantheon: Design, Materials, and Construction. Rome: Bretschneider.Google Scholar
Ward, C. A. and Barker, S.. 2015. “Roman Stone-Carvers and Re-Carving: Ingenuity in Recycling.” In Interdisciplinary Studies on Ancient Stone. ASMOSIA X. Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference of ASMOSIA Association for the Study of Marble and Other Stones in Antiquity Rome, 21–26 May 2012, edited by Eleonora, G. and Patrizio, P., 765–78. Rome: “L’Erma” di Bretschneider.Google Scholar
Ward, J. 1757. “An Account of the Alterations Making in the Pantheon at Rome: In an Extract of a Letter from Rome to Thomas Hollis, Esq; Communicated by John Ward, LL.D. R.S. Vice-praes.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society [1683–1775] 50:115–17.Google Scholar
Weiner, A. 1992. Inalienable Possessions: The Paradox of Keeping-While-Giving. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Winter, J. 1995. Sites of Memory, Sites of Mourning: The Great War in European Cultural History. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Winter, J. and Sivan, E.. 1999. War and Remembrance in the Twentieth Century. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ziolkowski, A. 1993Pantheon.” LTUR 4:5461.Google Scholar
Ziolkowski, A. 1994Was Agrippa’s Pantheon the Temple of Mars in Campo?PBSR 62:261–77.Google Scholar
Zuiderhoek, A. 2005. “The Icing on the Cake: Benefactors, Economics and Public Buildings in Roman Asia Minor.” In Patterns in the Economy of Roman Asia Minor, edited by Mitchell, S. and Kastari, C., 167–86. Swansea: Classical Press of Wales.Google Scholar
Zuiderhoek, A. 2007. “The Ambiguity of Munificence.” Historia 56.2:196213.Google Scholar
Zuiderhoek, A. 2009. The Politics of Munificence in the Roman Empire, Citizens, Elites and Benefactors in Asia Minor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×