Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g78kv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-26T09:28:31.792Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Misgivings about American Exceptionalism: Court Access as a Zero-Sum Game

from The Human Right to Accessible and Foreseeable Justice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 October 2018

R.L. Marcus
Affiliation:
University of California
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Everyone knows about American procedural exceptionalism. Indeed, it seems that American exceptionalism extends beyond procedure into other important bodies of law. A strong justification for this exceptionalism is that it affords unparalleled access to justice by guaranteeing that those who seek relief in court have the means and ability to obtain that relief. Indeed, it is so forceful that Professor Huang, a Korean scholar, wrote a whole book a decade ago urging that civil law systems switch to American ways of handling discovery and burden of proof to enable access to justice. He was forceful in his critique of the civil law process:

To put it bluntly, it is bizarre that while the [continental civil law] system tolerates fact-finding based on an information database that is far more insufficient than that of the common law system, it requires the facts to be established by a standard of proof that is far higher than the common law one.

To date, that broad challenge has not been taken up.

But that does not mean nothing has changed. To the contrary, American federal-court procedure (the original stimulus for much of the current exceptionalism in American procedure) has for several decades been the subject of repeated reform efforts, mainly by formal rule changes but also on occasion in judicial decisions. It is fair to say that this reform has tended to constrain and contain some of the most aggressive aspects of American procedure. European procedure seems, during this time, to have undergone some changes that may make it resemble American procedure a bit more. Both reform trends may be justified as methods of improving access to justice and protection of rights.

This contribution reports on the tenor of relatively recent American reform efforts, which may strike those from the rest of the world as surprising because they urge that access to justice, at least in terms of procedural arrangements, is something of a zero-sum game, a game theory construct in which a gain by one side can be had only if there is a corresponding loss by the other side. That seems a peculiar attitude to take toward procedure, which is designed in general to enable just results. Indeed, that is a central assumption of Professor Huang's book endorsing the adoption of American discovery and related concepts in the rest of the world.

Type
Chapter
Information
Revisiting Procedural Human Rights
Fundamentals of Civil Procedure and the Changing Face of Civil Justice
, pp. 53 - 76
Publisher: Intersentia
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×