Abel, Gregory A. and Glinert, Lewis H.. 2008. Chemotherapy as language: Sound symbolism in cancer medication names. Social Science and Medicine 66: 1863–9.Google Scholar

Abelin, Åsa. 1996. A lexical decision experiment with onomatopoeic, sound symbolicand arbitrary words. TMH-QPSR 2: 151–4.Google Scholar

Abelin, Åsa. 1999. Studies in Sound Symbolism. Gothenburg Monographs in Linguistics 17. Gothenburg: University of Gothenburg. https://utbildning.gu.se/digitalAssets/1318/1318563_abelin--a--diss.pdf; accessed 18 February 2016.Google Scholar

Abelin, Åsa. 2006. Experiments in investigating sound symbolism and onomatopoeia. Proceedings of ISCA Tutorial and Research Workshop on Experimental Linguistics. www.isca-speech.org/archive_open/archive_papers/exling_2006/exl6_061.pdf; accessed 18 February 2016.Google Scholar

Abelin, Åsa. 2011. Imitation of bird song in folklore – onomatopoeia or not? TMH-QPSR 51 (1): 13–16.Google Scholar

Aboh, Enoch Oladé, Smith, Norval and Zribi-Hertz, Anne. 2012. Reduplication beyond the word level: A cross-linguistic view. In: Aboh, Enoch Oladé, Smith, Norval and Zribi-Hertz, Anne (eds.), The Morphosyntax of Reiteration in Creole and Non-Creole Languages. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, 1–26.Google Scholar

Abraham, Werner. 2004. Intensity and diminution triggered by reduplicating morphology: Janus-faced iconicity. In: Hurch, Bernard (ed.), Studies on Reduplication. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 547–68.Google Scholar

Aczél, Petra. 2013. Visionary rhetoric: Teaching imagistic communication. In: András Benedek and Kristóf Nyíri (eds.), How to Do Things with Pictures: Skill, Practice, Performance. Frankfurt-am-Main: Peter Lang, 87–100.Google Scholar

Aczél, Petra. 2014. Expressivity and emotion in visionary rhetoric. In: Kristóf Nyíri and András Benedek (eds.), The Power of the Image: Emotion, Expression, Explanation. Frankfurt-am-Main: Peter Lang, 61–72.Google Scholar

Adams, Douglas. 1995. Life, the Universe and Everything. London: Del Rey.Google Scholar

Adams, Michael. 2009. Slang: The People’s Poetry. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adams, Valerie. 1973. An Introduction to Modern English Word-Formation. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Ahlner, Felix and Zlatev, Jordan. 2010. Cross-modal iconicity: A cognitive semiotic approach to sound symbolism. Σημειωτκή – Sign Systems Studies 1–4: 298–348.Google Scholar

Aitchison, Jean. 1994. ‘Say, Say It Again Sam’: The treatment of repetition in linguistics. In: Fischer, reas (ed.), Repetition. Tübingen: Günter Narr, 15–34.Google Scholar

Aitchison, Jean. 1997. The Language Web: The Power and Problem of Words. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Akita, Kimi. 2013. Constraints on the semantic extension of onomatopoeia. Public Journal of Semiotics 5 (1): 21–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Algeo, John. 1977. Blends: A structural and systemic view. American Speech 52 (1–2): 47–64.Google Scholar

Algeo, John. 1978. The taxonomy of word making. Word 29 (2): 122–31.Google Scholar

Allan, Keith. 1986. Linguistic Meaning, Volume 1. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Allan, Keith. 1987. Hierarchies and the choice of left conjuncts (with particular attention to English). Journal of Linguistics 23: 51–77.Google Scholar

Allan, Keith and Burridge, Kate. 2006. Forbidden Words: Taboo and the Censoring of Language. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Alpher, Barry. 1994. Yir-Yiront ideophones. In: Hinton, Leanne, Nichols, Johanna and Ohala, John J. (eds.), Sound Symbolism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 161–77.Google Scholar

Alpher, Barry and Nash, David. 1999. Lexical replacement and cognate equilibrium in Australia. Australian Journal of Linguistics 19 (1): 5–56.Google Scholar

Amanuma, Y. 1974. Dictionary of Onomatopoeias and Expressives. In Japanese. Tokyo: Tokyodo.Google Scholar

Anttila, Raimo and Embleton, Sheila. 1995. The Iconic Index: From sound change to rhyming slang. In: Simone, Rafaele (ed.), Iconicity in Language. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, 87–118.Google Scholar

Aoki, Haruo. 1994. Symbolism in Nez Perce. In: Hinton, Leanne, Nichols, Johanna and Ohala, John J. (eds.), Sound Symbolism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 15–22.Google Scholar

Arleo, And y. 2009. Pif paf poof: Ablaut reduplication in children’s counting-out rhymes. In: Aroui, Jean-Louis and Arleo, y (eds.), Towards a Typology of Poetic Forms: From Language to Metrics and Beyond. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, 307–34.Google Scholar

Aronoff, Mark. 1976. Word Formation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Asano, M., Imai, M., Kita, S., Kitajo, K., Okada, H. and Thierry, G.. 2015. Sound symbolism scaffolds language development in preverbal infants. Cortex 63: 196‒205.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Assaneo, María Florencia, Nichols, Juan Ignacio and Trevisan, Marcos Alberto. 2011. The anatomy of onomatopoeia. PLoS ONE 6 (12): e28317.Google Scholar

Attridge, Derek. 1984. Language as imitation: Jakobson, Joyce, and the art of onomatopoeia. MLN 99 (5): 1116–40.Google Scholar

Austerlitz, Robert. 1994. Finnish and Gilyak sound symbolism – the interplay between system and history. In: Hinton, Leanne, Nichols, Johanna and Ohala, John J. (eds.), Sound Symbolism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 249–60.Google Scholar

Baker, L., Fernandez-Fein, S., Scher, D. and Williams, H.. 1998. Home experiences related to the development of word recognition. In: Metsala, J. L. and Ehri, L. C. (eds.), Word Recognition in Beginning Literacy. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 263–87.Google Scholar

Baldi, Philip and Dawar, Chantal. 2000. Creative processes. In: Booij, Geert, Lehmann, Christian and Mugdan, Joachim (eds.), Morphologie/Morphology: Ein internationales Handbuch zur Flexion und Wortbildung /An International Handbook on Inflection and Word Formation, Volume 1. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 963–72.Google Scholar

Bat-El, Outi. 2000. The grammaticality of ‘extragrammatical’ morphology. In: Doleschal, Ursula and Thomson, Anna Maria (eds.), Extragrammatical and Marginal Morphology. Munich: Lincom Europa, 61–84.Google Scholar

Bauer, Laurie. 1983. English Word-Formation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bauer, Laurie. 2003. Introducing Linguistic Morphology. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Bauer, Laurie. 2006. Compounds and minor word-formation types. In: Aarts, Bas and McMahon, April (eds.), The Handbook of English Linguistics. Malden, MA: Blackwell: 177–98.Google Scholar

Bauer, Laurie. 2015. The importance of marginal productivity. SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics 12 (1): 72–7.Google Scholar

Bauer, Winifred. 1993. Maori. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Beal, Joan. 1991. Toy boys and lager louts: Motivation by linguistic form? In: Tieken-Boon, I. van Ostade and Frankis, J. (eds.), Language Usage and Description: Studies Presented to N.E. Osselton on the Occasion of His Retirement. Amsterdam and Atlanta, GA: Rodopi, 139–48.Google Scholar

Beck, C., Kardatzki, B. and Ethofer, T.. 2014. Mondegreens and soramimi as a method to induce misperceptions of speech content: Influence of familiarity, wittiness, and language competence. PLoS ONE 9 (1): e84667.Google Scholar

Begg, I. M., Anas, A. and Farinacci, S.. 1992. Dissociation of processes in belief: Source recollection, statement familiarity, and the illusion of truth. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 121: 446–58.Google Scholar

Benczes, Réka. 2006a. Creative Compounding in English: The Semantics of Metaphorical and Metonymical Noun–Noun Combinations. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Benczes, Réka. 2006b. Analysing metonymical noun–noun compounds: The case of freedom fries. In: Benczes, Réka and Csábi, Szilvia (eds.), The Metaphors of Sixty: Papers Presented on the Occasion of the 60th Birthday of Zoltán Kövecses. Budapest: Eötvös Loránd University, 53–61.Google Scholar

Benczes, Réka. 2010. Setting limits on creativity in the production and use of metaphorical and metonymical compounds. In: Michel, Sascha and Onysko, Alexander (eds.), Cognitive Approaches to Word Formation. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 221–45.Google Scholar

Benczes, Réka. 2012a. Why snail mail and not turtle mail? On the role of rhyme in novel creative compounds. In: Kleinke, Sonja, Kövecses, Zoltán, Musolff, reas and Szelid, Veronika (eds.), Cognition and Culture: The Role of Metaphor and Metonymy. Budapest: ELTE Eötvös Kiadó, 45–52.Google Scholar

Benczes, Réka. 2012b. Just a load of hibber-gibber? Making sense of English rhyming compounds. Australian Journal of Linguistics 32 (3): 299–326.Google Scholar

Benczes, Réka. 2013. The role of alliteration and rhyme in novel metaphorical and metonymical compounds. Metaphor and Symbol 28 (3): 167–84.Google Scholar

Benczes, Réka. 2014. Ami rímel az stimmel [What Rhymes Is Right]. In: Ladányi, Mária, Vladár, Zsuzsa and Hrenek, Éva (eds.), MANYE XXIII. Konferenciakötet [Conference Proceedings of the 23rd Meeting of the Society of Hungarian Applied Linguists]. Budapest: Tinta Könyvkiadó, 109–14.Google Scholar

Benczes, Réka and Burridge, Kate. 2018. Speaking of disease and death. In: Allan, Keith (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Taboo Words and Language. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 61–76.Google Scholar

Benor, Sarah B. and Levy, Roger. 2006. The chicken or the egg? A probabilistic analysis of English binomials. Language 82: 233–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bentin, Schlomo. 1992. Phonological awareness, reading, and reading acquisition: A survey and appraisal of current knowledge. Haskins Laboratories Status Report on Speech Research SR-111/112: 167–80.Google Scholar

Bergen, Benjamin K. 2004. The psychological reality of phonaesthemes. Language 80 (2): 290–311.Google Scholar

Berman, J. M. 1961. Contribution on blending. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 9: 278–81.Google Scholar

Blake, Barry J. 2010. Secret Language: Codes, Tricks, Spies, Thieves, and Symbols. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Blake, Barry J. 2017. Sound symbolism in English: Weighing the evidence. Australian Journal of Linguistics 37 (3): 286–313.Google Scholar

Bloomfield, Leonard. 1933. Language. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar

Bloomfield, Maurice. 1895. On assimilation and adaptation in congeneric classes of words. American Journal of Philology 16: 409–34.Google Scholar

Bloomfield, Morton W. and Newmark, Leonard. 1963. A Linguistic Introduction to the History of English. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar

Boers, Frank. 2000. Metaphor awareness and vocabulary retention. Applied Linguistics 21 (4): 553–71.Google Scholar

Boers, Frank and Lindstromberg, Seth. 2008. Structural elaboration by the sound (and feel) of it. In: Boers, Frank and Lindstromberg, Seth (eds.), Cognitive Linguistic Approaches to Teaching Vocabulary and Phraseology. Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter, 329‒54.Google Scholar

Boers, Frank, Lindstromberg, Seth and Eyckmans, June. 2014. Is alliteration mnemonic without awareness-raising? Language Awareness 23 (4): 291–303.Google Scholar

Bohannon, John Neil, MacWhinney, Brian and Snow, Catherine. 1990. No negative evidence revisited: Beyond learnability or who has to prove what to whom. Developmental Psychology 26 (2): 221–6.Google Scholar

Bolinger, Dwight L. 1948. On defining the morpheme. Word 4: 18‒23.Google Scholar

Bolinger, Dwight L. 1949. The sign is not arbitrary. Boletín del Instituto Caro y Cuervo 5: 52‒62.Google Scholar

Bolinger, Dwight L. 1950a. Rime, assonance, and morpheme analysis. Word 6 (2): 117‒36.Google Scholar

Bolinger, Dwight L. 1950b. Shivaree and the phonestheme. American Speech 25: 134‒5.Google Scholar

Bolinger, Dwight L. 1962. Binomials and pitch accent. Lingua 11: 34–44.Google Scholar

Bolinger, Dwight and Sears, D. A.. 1981. Aspects of Language, 3rd edn. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.Google Scholar

Bond, Z. S. 1999. Slips of the Ear: Errors in the Perception of Casual Conversation. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Booij, Geert. 2010. Construction Morphology. Language and Linguistics Compass 4 (7): 543–55.Google Scholar

Bortfeld, Heather, Morgan, James L., Golinkoff, Roberta Michnick and Rathbun, Karen. 2005. Mommy and me: Familiar names help launch babies into speech stream segmentation. Psychological Science 16 (4): 298–304.Google Scholar

Bottineau, Didier. 2008. The submorphemic conjecture in English: Towards a distributed model of the cognitive dynamics of submorphemes. Lexis 2008: 17–40.Google Scholar

Boulton, Marjorie. 1982. The Anatomy of Poetry, 2nd revised edn. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Bradley, L. and Bryant, P. E.. 1978. Difficulties in auditory organization as a possible cause of reading backwardness. Nature 271: 746–7.Google Scholar

Bradley, L. and Bryant, P. E.. 1983. Categorizing sounds and learning to read: A causal connection. Nature 301: 419–21.Google Scholar

Brdar-Szabó, Rita and Brdar, Mario. 2008. On the marginality of lexical blending. Jezikoslovlje 9 (1–2): 171–94.Google Scholar

Bredin, Hugh. 1996. Onomatopoeia as a figure and a linguistic principle. New Literary History 27 (3): 555−69.Google Scholar

Brown, Byron. 1979. Rhetorical figures of communion, presence, and severance: Toward an efficient rhetoric of business. The ABCA Bulletin 42 (3): 14–7.Google Scholar

Brown, Roger. 1958. Words and Things: An Introduction to Language. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar

Brown, Roger W. and Nuttall, Ronald. 1959. Method in phonetic symbolism experiments. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 59: 441–45.Google Scholar

Brown, Roger W., Black, Abraham H. and Horowitz, Arnold E.. 1955. Phonetic symbolism in natural languages. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 50: 388–93.Google Scholar

Bryant, P. E., MacLean, M., Bradley, L. L. and Crossland, J.. 1990. Rhyme and alliteration, phoneme detection, and learning to read. Developmental Psychology 26 (3): 429–38.Google Scholar

Burridge, Kate. 2004. Blooming English: Observations on the Roots, Cultivation and Hybrids of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Burridge, Kate and Benczes, Réka. 2018. Taboo as a driver of language change. In: Allan, Keith (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Taboo Words and Language. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 180–98.Google Scholar

Burridge, Kate and Bergs, Alexander. 2017. Understanding Language Change. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan. 2001. Phonology and Language Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan. 2006. From usage to grammar: The mind’s response to repetition. Language 82 (4): 711–33.Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan. 2010. Language, Usage and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan L. and Moder, Carol Lynn. 1983. Morphological classes as natural categories. Language 59 (2): 251–70.Google Scholar

Campbell, Lyle. 2005. How to show languages are related: Methods for distant genetic relationship. In: Joseph, Brian D. and Janda, Richard D. (eds.), The Handbook of Historical Linguistics. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing, 262–82.Google Scholar

Carroll, David. 1986. Psychology of Language. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.Google ScholarPubMed

Carroll, John B., Davies, Peter and Richman, Barry. 1971. The American Heritage Word Frequency Book. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar

Carter, Ronald. 1999. Common language: Corpus, creativity and cognition. Language and Literature 8 (3): 195–216.Google Scholar

Carter, Ronald. 2004. Language and Creativity: The Art of Common Talk. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Cassidy, Kimberly Wright, Kelly, Michael H. and Sharoni, Lee’at J.. 1999. Inferring gender from name phonology. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 128 (3): 362–81.Google Scholar

Caton, Charles Steven. 1990. ‘Peaks of Yemen I summon’: Poetry as Cultural Practice in a North Yemeni Tribe. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Ceccherini-Nelli, Alfonso, Kulinska, Marta, Murray, David and Logan, Harry M.. 2014. Speech perceptual periodicities facilitate lexical access and contextual emotional responses. International Journal of English Linguistics 4 (3): 96–105.Google Scholar

Childs, G. T. 1994. African ideophones. In: Hinton, Leanne, Nichols, Johanna and Ohala, John J. (eds.), Sound Symbolism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 178–204.Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Chovanec, Jan. 2008. Focus on form: Foregrounding devices in football reporting. Discourse and Communication 2 (3): 219–42.Google Scholar

Chukovsky, K. 1963. From Two to Five. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Ciccotosto, N. 1991. Sound symbolism in natural language. PhD thesis, University of Florida.Google Scholar

Clark, Eve V. 2009. First Language Acquisition, 2nd edn. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Coates, Richard. 1999. Word Structure. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Cockcroft, Robert and Cockcroft, Susan. 2005. Persuading People: An Introduction to Rhetoric, 2nd edn. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Connor, Steven. 2009. Earslips: Of mishearings and mondegreens. Talk presented at the conference Listening In, Feeding Back, Columbia University, 14 February 2009. www.stevenconnor.com/earslips; accessed 7 September 2017.Google Scholar

Cook, Guy. 2000. Language Play, Language Learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Cooper, William and Ross, John. 1975. Word order. In: Groddman, Robin E., San, James L. and Vance, Timothy J. (eds.), Papers from the Parasession on Functionalism. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press, 63–111.Google Scholar

Crystal, David. 1996. Language play and linguistic intervention. Child Language Teaching and Therapy 12 (3): 328–44.Google Scholar

Crystal, David. 1998. Language Play. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Cutler, A., McQueen, J. and Robinson, K.. 1990. Elizabeth and John: Sound patterns of men’s and women’s names. Journal of Linguistics 26: 471–82.Google Scholar

Dalton, Dan. 2015. 32 of the most beautiful words in the English language. Buzzfeed, 9 March 2011. www.buzzfeed.com/danieldalton/bob-ombinate#.rnLwDwXxZ; accessed 19 April 2016.Google Scholar

Davis, Derick F., Bagchi, Rajesh and Block, Lauren G.. 2016. Alliteration alters: Phonetic overlap in promotional messages influences evaluations and choice. Journal of Retailing 92 (1): 1‒12.Google Scholar

Davis, R. 1961. The fitness of names to drawings: A cross-cultural study in Tanganyika. British Journal of Psychology 52: 259‒68.Google Scholar

De Cuypere, Ludovic. 2008. Limiting the Iconic: From the Metatheoretical Foundations to the Creative Possibilities of Iconicity in Language. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

DeForest, Tim. 2004. Storytelling in the Pulps, Comics, and Radio: How Technology Changed Popular Fiction in America. Jefferson, NC: McFarland and Company.Google Scholar

Dickson, Keith M. 1994. Ritual semiosis – mumbojumbo: Magic, language, semiotic dirt. American Journal of Semiotics 11 (2): 151–72.Google Scholar

Dingemanse, Mark. n.d. Why do we cry out ‘ouch’ when we’re in pain? Translated by Katrien Segaert and Judith Holler. www.mpi.nl/q-a/questions-and-answers/why-do-we-cry-out-ouch-when-were-in-pain; accessed 12 July 2016.Google Scholar

Dingemanse, Mark, Blasi, Damián E., Lupyan, Gary, Christiansen, Morten H. and Monaghan, Padraic. 2015. Arbitrariness, iconicity and systematicity in language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 19 (10): 603–15.Google Scholar

Doke, C. 1935. Bantu Linguistic Terminology. London: Longmans.Google Scholar

Dressler, Wolfgang U. and Karpf, Annemarie. 1995. The theoretical relevance of pre- and protomorphology in language acquisition. In: Booij, Geert and van Marle, Jaap (eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 1994. Alphen aan den Rijn, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 99–122.Google Scholar

Dressler, Wolfgang U. and Merlini Barbaresi, Laura. 1994. Morphopragmatics: Diminutives and Intensifiers in Italian, German, and Other Languages. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Dressler, Wolfgang U., Dziubalska-Kołaczyk, Katarzyna, Gagarina, Natalia and Kilani-Schoch, Marianne. 2004. Reduplication in child language. In: Hurch, Bernard (ed.), Studies on Reduplication. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 455–474.Google Scholar

Dunbar, R. 1993. Coevolution of neocortical size, group size and language in humans. Behavioral Brain Sciences 16: 681‒735.Google Scholar

Duranti, A. 1997. Linguistic Anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Elliot, A. J. 1981. Child Language. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Evans, Vyvyan and Green, Melanie. 2006. Cognitive Linguistics: An Introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Fabb, Nigel. 1998. Compounding. In: Spencer, rew and Zwicky, Arnold M. (eds.), The Handbook of Morphology. Oxford: Blackwell, 66–84.Google Scholar

Fandrych, Ingrid. 2008. Submorphemic elements in the formation of acronyms, blends and clippings. Lexis 2: 105–23.Google Scholar

Fay, David and Cutler, Anne. 1977. Malapropisms and the structure of the mental lexicon. Linguistic Inquiry 8 (3): 505–20.Google Scholar

Feist, Jim. 2013. ‘Sound symbolism’ in English. Journal of Pragmatics 45: 104–18.Google Scholar

Fenk-Oczlon, Gertraud. 1989. Word frequency and word order in freezes. Linguistics 27: 517–56.Google Scholar

Ferguson, Charles A. 1978. Talking to children: A search for universals. In: Greenberg, J. H. (ed.), Universals of Human Language. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 176–89.Google Scholar

Fernald, Anne. 1985. Four-month-old infants prefer to listen to motherese. Infant Behavior and Development 8: 181–95.Google Scholar

Filkuková, Petra and Klempe, Sven Hroar. 2013. Rhyme as reason in commercial and social advertising. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 54: 423–31.Google Scholar

Firth, J. R. 1930/1964. The Tongues of Men, and Speech. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Fischer, And reas. 1999. What, if anything, is phonological iconicity? In: Nänny, Max and Fischer, Olga (eds.), Form Miming Meaning: Iconicity in Language and Literature. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, 123−34.Google Scholar

Fischer, Olga and Nänny, Max. 1999. Introduction. In: Nänny, Max and Fischer, Olga (eds.), Form Miming Meaning: Iconicity in Language and Literature. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, xv−xxxvi.Google Scholar

Fischer, Roswitha. 1998. Lexical Change in Present-Day English: A Corpus-based study of the Motivation, Institutionalization and Productivity of Creative Neologisms. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar

Fónagy, Iván. 1963. Die Metaphern in der Phonetik. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar

Fónagy, Iván. 1999. Why iconicity? In: Nänny, Max and Fischer, Olga (eds.), Form Miming Meaning: Iconicity in Language and Literature. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, 3−36.Google Scholar

Foster, Peter, Squires, Nick, Botzas, Senay, Huggler, Justin, Day, Matthew and Orange, Richard 2016. Brexit contagion: UK vote raises fears of a tsunami of EU membership referendums. The Telegraph, 28 June 2016. www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/06/28/brexit-contagion-uk-vote-raises-fears-of-a-tsunami-of-eu-members; accessed 20 September 2018.Google Scholar

Fox, Anthony. 2000. Prosodic Features and Prosodic Structure: The Phonology of ‘Suprasegmentals’. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Francis, W. Nelson and Kučera, Henry. 1982. Frequency Analysis of English Usage: Lexicon and Grammar. With the assistance of Andrew W. Mackie. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar

Fraser, Helen. 2014. When teaching phonology isn’t enough: Evidence from mondegreens. Speak Out! 50: 29–33.Google Scholar

Freud, Sigmund. 1941/2002. Psychopathology of Everyday Life. Translated by Anthea Bell. London: Penguin.Google Scholar

Freud, Sigmund. 1958/1973. Slips of the tongue. Reprint from Psychopathology of Everyday Life, Chapter 5. Translated from the original by A. A. Brill (New York: New American Library). In: Fromkin, Victoria (ed.), Speech Errors as Linguistic Evidence. The Hague and Paris: Mouton, 46−81.Google Scholar

Friederici, A., Friedrich, M. and Christophe, A.. 2007. Brain responses in 4-month-old infants are already language specific. Current Biology 17: 1208–11.Google Scholar

Fromkin, Victoria (ed.). 1973a. Speech Errors as Linguistic Evidence. The Hague and Paris: Mouton.Google Scholar

Fromkin, Victoria. 1973b. The non-anomalous nature of anomalous utterances. In: Fromkin, Victoria (ed.), Speech Errors as Linguistic Evidence. The Hague and Paris: Mouton, 215−42.Google Scholar

Fromkin, Victoria. 1973c. Introduction. In: Fromkin, Victoria (ed.), Speech Errors as Linguistic Evidence. The Hague and Paris: Mouton, 11−45.Google Scholar

Fuertes-Olivera, Pedro A., Velasco-Sacristán, Marisol, Arribas-Baño, Ascención and Samaniego-Fernandéz, Eva. 2001. Persuasion and advertising in English: Metadiscourse in slogans and headlines. Journal of Pragmatics 33: 1291–307.Google Scholar

Furrow, David, Nelson, Katherine and Benedict, Helen. 1979. Mothers’ speech to children and syntactic development: Some simple relationships. Journal of Child Language 6: 423–42.Google Scholar

Galak, J. and Nelson, L. D.. 2011. The virtues of opaque prose: How lay beliefs about fluency influence perceptions of quality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 47 (1): 250–3.Google Scholar

Geller, Linda G. 1982. Linguistic consciousness-raising: Child’s play. Language Arts 59 (2): 120–5.Google Scholar

Geller, Linda G. 1985. Wordplay and Language Learning for Children. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.Google Scholar

Ghomeshi, Jila, Jackendoff, Ray, Rosen, Nicole and Russell, Kevin. 2004. Contrastive focus reduplication in English (the salad-salad paper). Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 22: 307–57.Google Scholar

Gibbs, Raymond W. 1994. The Poetics of Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gibbs, Raymond W. and Franks, Heather. 2002. Embodied metaphors in women’s narratives about their experiences with cancer. Health Communication 14 (2): 139–65.Google Scholar

Giora, Rache, Fein, Ofer, Kronrod, Ann, Elnatan, Idit, Shuval, Noa and Zur, Adi. 2004. Weapons of mass distraction: Optimal innovation and pleasure ratings. Metaphor and Symbol 19 (2): 115–41.Google Scholar

Gonnerman, Laura M., Seidenberg, Mark S. and Anderson, Elaine S.. 2007. Graded semantic and phonological similarity effects in priming: Evidence for a distributed connectionist approach to morphology. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 136 (2): 323–45.Google Scholar

Görlach, M. 2000. Rhyming slang world-wide: Homegrown or imported? English World-Wide 21 (1): 1–24.Google Scholar

Goswami, Usha. 2003. Early phonological development and the acquisition of literacy. In: Neuman, Susan B. and Dickinson, David K. (eds.), Handbook of Early Literacy Research, Volume I. New York and London: Guilford Publications, 111–25.Google Scholar

Gries, Stefan Th. 2004. Shouldn’t it be breakfunch? A quantitative analysis of blend structure in English. Linguistics 42 (3): 639–67.Google Scholar

Gries, Stefan Th. 2006. Cognitive determinants of subtractive word-formation processes: A corpus-based perspective. Cognitive Linguistics 17 (4): 535–58.Google Scholar

Gries, Stefan Th. 2011. Phonological similarity in multi-word units. Cognitive Linguistics 22 (3): 491–510.Google Scholar

Guerini, Marco, Özbal, Gözde and Strappavara, Carlo. 2015. Echoes of persuasion: The effect of euphony in persuasive communication. http://arxiv.org/abs/1508.05817v1; accessed 7 September 2018.Google Scholar

Gustafson, Marita. 1975. Binomial Expressions in Present-day English: A Syntactic and Semantic Study. Turku: Turun yliopisto.Google Scholar

Guynes, Sean A. 2014. Four-color sound: A Peircean semiotics of comic book onomatopoeia. Public Journal of Semiotics 6 (1): 58–72.Google Scholar

Haig, Matt. 2003. Brand Failures: The Truth about the 100 Biggest Branding Mistakes of All Time. London and Philadelphia, PA: Kogan Page.Google Scholar

Haiman, John. 1980. The iconicity of grammar. Isomorphism and motivation. Language 56: 514–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haiman, John. 1995. Moods and metamessages. In: Bybee, Joan and Fleischmann, S. (eds.), Modality in Grammar and Discourse. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 329–45.Google Scholar

Haiman, John. 1997. Repetition and identity. Lingua 100: 57–70.Google Scholar

Hall, Geoff. 2001. The poetics of everyday language. CAUCE, Revista de Filología y su Didáctica 24: 69–86.Google Scholar

Halmari, Helena. 2011. Alliteration in inaugural addresses: From George Washington to Barack Obama. In: Roper, Jonathan (ed.), Alliteration in Culture. Palgrave Macmillan, 45–61.Google Scholar

Hamano, Shoko. 1994. Palatalization in Japanese sound symbolism. In: Hinton, Leanne, Nichols, Johanna and Ohala, John J. (eds.), Sound Symbolism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 148–57.Google Scholar

Hansen, K. 1964. Reim- und Ablautverdoppelungen. Zetschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 12: 5–32.Google Scholar

Hansson, Gunnar Ólafur. 2010. Consonant harmony: Long-distance interaction in phonology. PhD thesis, University of California.Google Scholar

Harm, Michael W. and Seidenberg, Mark S.. 2004. Computing the meanings of words in reading: Cooperative division of labor between visual and phonological processes. Psychological Review 111 (3): 662‒720.Google Scholar

Harris, Roy. 1982. The Language Myth. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar

Harris, Roy. 1987. Language and social interaction: Integrationalism versus segregationalism. Language Sciences 9 (2): 131–43.Google Scholar

Harris, Roy. 1996. Signs, Language and Communication. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin. 2002. Understanding Morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hayashi, Makoto, Raymond, Geoffrey and Sidell, Jack. 2012. Conversational repair and human understanding: An introduction. In: Hayashi, Makoto, Raymond, Geoffrey and Sidell, Jack (eds.), Conversational Repair and Human Understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1−40.Google Scholar

Hayes, Rachel A., Slater, Alan and Brown, Elizabeth. 2000. Infants’ ability to categorise on the basis of rhyme. Cognitive Development 15 (4): 405–19.Google Scholar

Heath, Dan and Heath, Chip. 2011. How to pick the perfect brand name. Fast Company, online edition, 3 January 2011. www.fastcompany.com/1702256/how-pick-perfect-brand-name; accessed 11 October 2016.Google Scholar

Hilmer, H. 1914. Schallnachamung, Wortschoepfung und Bedeutungswandel. Helle: n.p.Google Scholar

Hinton, Leanne, Nichols, Johanna and Ohala, John J.. 1994. Introduction: Sound symbolic processes. In: Hinton, Leanne, Nichols, Johanna and Ohala, John J. (eds.), Sound Symbolism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–12.Google Scholar

Hladký, Josef. 1998. Notes on Reduplicative Words in English. Brno Studies in English 24. Brno: Brno University.Google Scholar

Hock, Hans Henrich. 1991. Principles of Historical Linguistics, 2nd edn. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Hock, Hans Henrich and Joseph, Brian D.. 1996. Language History, Language Change, and Language Relationship: An Introduction to Historical and Comparative Linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Hoff, E. 2003. The specificity of environmental influence: Socioeconomic status affects early vocabulary development via maternal speech. Child Development 74: 1368–78.Google Scholar

Hohenhaus, Peter. 2004. Identical constituent compounds: A corpus-based study. Folia Linguistica 38 (3–4): 297–331.Google Scholar

Hohenhaus, Peter. 2007. How to do (even more) things with nonce words (other than naming). In Munat, Judith (ed.), Lexical Creativity, Texts, and Contexts. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, 16–38.Google Scholar

Hopper, Paul J. 1987. Emergent grammar. Berkeley Linguistics Society 13: 139–57.Google Scholar

Hopper, Robert. 1992. Speech errors and the poetics of everyday conversation. Text and Performance Quarterly 12: 113–24.Google Scholar

Householder, Fred W. 1946. On the problem of sound and meaning, and English phonaestheme. Word 2: 83–4.Google Scholar

Hrushovski, Benjamin. 1980. The meaning of sound patterns in poetry: An interaction theory. Poetics Today 2 (1a): 39–56.Google Scholar

Hughes, Geoffrey. 2000. A History of English Words. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Hutchins, Sharon S. 1998. The psychological reality, variability, and compositionality of English phonaesthemes. PhD thesis, Emory University. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.Google Scholar

Huttenlocher, J., Vasilyeva, M., Waterfall, H., Vevea, J. and Hedges, L. V.. 2007. Varieties of caregiver speech. Developmental Psychology 43: 1062–83.Google Scholar

Imai, Mutsumi and Kita, Sotaro. 2014. The sound symbolism bootstrapping hypothesis for language acquisition and language evolution. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 369: 20130298.Google Scholar

Imai, M., Kita, S., Nagumo, M. and Okada, H.. 2008. Sound symbolism facilitates early verb learning. Cognition 109: 54–65.Google Scholar

Ingram, David. 1974. Phonological rules in young children. Journal of Child Language 1: 49–64.Google Scholar

Iwasaki, Noriko, Vinson, David P. and Vigliocco, Gabriella. 2007. How does it hurt, kiri-kiri or siku-siku? Japanese mimetic words of pain perceived by Japanese speakers and English speakers. In: Minami, Masahiko (ed.), Applying Theory and Research in Learning Japanese as a Foreign Language. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2–19.Google Scholar

Jacobsen, William H., Jr. 1994. Nootkan vocative vocalism and its implications. In: Hinton, Leanne, Nichols, Johanna and Ohala, John J. (eds.), Sound Symbolism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 23–39.Google Scholar

Jakesch, M., Leder, H. and Forster, M.. 2013. Image ambiguity and fluency. PLoS ONE 8 (9): e74084.Google Scholar

Jakobson, Roman. 1960. Closing statement: Linguistics and poetics. In. Sebeok, Thomas A. (ed.), Style in Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 350–77.Google Scholar

Jefferson, Gail. 1996. On the poetics of ordinary talk. Text and Performance Quarterly 16: 1–61.Google Scholar

Jespersen, Otto. 1918. Nogle men-ord. In: Studier tillegnade Esaias Tegner. Lund, 49–55.Google Scholar

Jespersen, Otto. 1933. Symbolic value of the vowel i. In: Jespersen, O. (ed.), Linguistica: Selected Papers in English, French and German. Copenhagen: Levin and Munksgaard, 283–303.Google Scholar

Jespersen, Otto. 1942/1965. A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles. Part VI: Morphology. London: George Allen and Unwin Ltd.Google Scholar

Jones, John T., Pelham, Brett W., Carvallo, Mauricio and Mirenberg, Matthew J.. 2004. How do I love thee? Let me count the Js: Implicit egotism and interpersonal attraction. Journal of Personal and Social Psychology 87 (5): 665–83.Google Scholar

Jonson, Ben. 1640. The English Grammar. New York: The Sturgis & Walton Company.Google Scholar

Joseph, Brian D. 1994. Modern Greek ts: Beyond sound symbolism. In: Hinton, Leanne, Nichols, Johanna and Ohala, John J. (eds.), Sound Symbolism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 222–36.Google Scholar

Joseph, Brian D. 1997. On the linguistics of marginality: The centrality of the periphery. www.ling.ohio-state.edu/~bjoseph/publications/1997onth.pdf; accessed 14 July 2016.Google Scholar

Jusczyk, Peter W. and Aslin, Richard N.. 1995. Infants’ detection of the sound patterns of words in fluent speech. Cognitive Psychology 29: 1–23.Google Scholar

Jusczyk, P. W., Cutler, A. and Redanz, N.. 1993. Preference for the dominant stress patterns of English words. Child Development 64: 675–87.Google Scholar

Jusczyk, P. W., Goodman, M. B. and Baumann, A.. 1999. Nine-month-olds’ attention to sound similarities in syllables. Journal of Memory and Language 40: 62–82.Google Scholar

Kadooka, Ken-Ichi. 2005. On the degree of lexicalization in English onomatopoeia from a historical perspective. The Ryukoku Journal of Humanities and Sciences 27 (1): 1–13.Google Scholar

Kantartzis, Katerina, Imai, Mutsumi and Kita, Sotaro. 2011. Japanese sound-symbolism facilitates word learning in English-speaking children. Cognitive Science 35: 575–85.Google Scholar

Kardela, Henryk. 2016. Analyzability and institutionalization: Setting parameters in cognitive morphology. SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics 13 (2): 69–90.Google Scholar

Karlgren, B. 1962. Sound Symbolism in Chinese. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.Google Scholar

Katamba, Francis. 1993. Morphology. Houndmills and London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Kelly, Barbara F., Leben, William R. and Cohen, Robert H.. 2003. The meanings of consonants. Proceedings from the Twenty-Ninth Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 245–54.Google Scholar

Kelly, Michael H. 1992. Using sound to solve syntactic problems: The role of phonology in grammatical category assignments. Psychological Review 99 (2): 349–64.Google Scholar

Kelly, Michael H. 1998. To ‘brunch’ or to ‘brench’: Some aspects of blend structure. Linguistics 36 (3): 579–90.Google Scholar

Kelly, Steve. 2014. Watch Benedict Cumberbatch reveal he struggles to say the word ‘PENGUIN’. The Mirror, 25 October 2014. www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/watch-benedict-cumberbatch-reveal-struggles-4505901; accessed 7 April 2016.Google Scholar

Kemmer, Suzanne. 2003. Schemas and lexical blends. In Cuyckens, H., Berg, Th, Dirven, R. and Panther, K.-U. (eds.), Motivation in Language: Studies in Honor of Günter Radden. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, 69–97.Google Scholar

Kern, S. 2010. Les premiers mots du jeune enfant français: analyse quantitative et qualitative du vocabulaire receptif et productif des deux premières années de vie. Rééducation orthophonique 244: 149–65.Google Scholar

Kilian-Hatz, I. 2009. Ideophones. In: Allan, Keith (ed.), Concise Encyclopedia of Semantics. Oxford: Elsevier, 400−3.Google Scholar

Kim, Kong-on. 1977. Sound symbolism in Korean. Journal of Linguistics 13: 67–75.Google Scholar

Klamer, Marian. 2001. Expressives and iconicity in the lexicon. In: Voeltz, F. K. E. and Kilian-Hatz, C. (eds.), Ideophones. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, 165–81.Google Scholar

Klamer, Marian. 2002. Semantically motivated lexical patterns: A study of Dutch and Kambera expressives. Language 78: 258–87.Google Scholar

Klink, Richard R. 2000. Creating brand names with meaning: The use of sound symbolism. Marketing Letters 11 (1): 5–20.Google Scholar

Knowles, Gerald. 2014. Patterns of Spoken English: An Introduction to English Phonetics. Abingdon and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Köhler, Wolfgang. 1929. Gestalt Psychology, 2nd edn. New York: Liveright.Google Scholar

Kouwenberg, Silvia and Darlene, LaCharité. 2004. Less is more: Evidence from diminutive reduplication in Caribbean Creole languages. In: Hurch, Bernard (ed.), Studies on Reduplication. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 533–45.Google Scholar

Kövecses, Zoltán. 2006. Language, Mind, and Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kövecses, Zoltán. 2015. Where Metaphors Come From: Reconsidering Context in Metaphor. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kövecses, Zoltán and Radden, Günter. 1998. Metonymy: Developing a cognitive linguistic view. Cognitive Linguistics 9 (1): 37–77.Google Scholar

Kövecses, Zoltán and Péter, Szabó. 1996. Idioms: A view from cognitive linguistics. Applied Linguistics 17 (3): 326–55.Google Scholar

Krause-Jackson, Flavia. 2015. Economist who coined ‘Grexit’ now says Greece will stay in Euro. Bloomberg, 28 June 2015. www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-06-28/economist-who-coined-grexit-now-says-greece-will-stay-in-euro; accessed 20 September 2018.Google Scholar

Kredenser, G. 1968. Express Yourself in Writing. New York: Sterling.Google Scholar

Kuhl, P. K., Williams, K. A., Lacerda, F., Stevens, K. N. and Lindblom, B.. 1992. Linguistic experiences alter phonetic perception in infants by 6 months of age. Science 255: 606–8.Google Scholar

Kwon, Nahyun and Round, Erich R.. 2015. Phonaesthemes in morphological theory. Morphology 25: 1–27.Google Scholar

Lahti, Katherine, Barrett, Rusty and Webster, Anthony K.. 2014. Ideophones: Between grammar and poetry. Pragmatics and Society 5 (3): 335–40.Google Scholar

Laing, Catherine E. 2011. Phonological analysis of onomatopoeia in early word production. First Language 34 (5): 387–405.Google Scholar

Laing, Catherine E. 2017. A perceptual advantage for onomatopoeia in early word learning: Evidence from eye-tracking. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 161: 32–45.Google Scholar

Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Lakoff, George and Johnson, Mark. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Lambert, James. 2013. A much-tortured expression: A new look at hobson-jobson.International Journal of Lexicography 27 (1): 54–88.Google Scholar

Langacker, Ronald W. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Volume I: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Langacker, Ronald W. 2008. Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Lapolla, Randy J. 1994. An experimental investigation into phonetic symbolism as it relates to Mandarin Chinese. In: Hinton, Leanne, Nichols, Johanna and Ohala, John J. (eds.), Sound Symbolism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 130–47.Google Scholar

Lass, Roger. 1984. Phonology: An Introduction to Basic Concepts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Laufer, B. and Waldman, T.. 2011. Verb–noun collocations in second language writing: A corpus analysis of learners’ English. Language Learning 61 (2): 647–72.Google Scholar

Lawler, John M. 1990. Women, men and bristly things: The phonosemantics of the br- assonance in English. Michigan Working Papers in Linguistics 1 (1): 27–38.Google Scholar

Lawrence, Jeremy. 2003. Hocus-pocus: An A-to-Z of Reduplicated Words and Phrases. Cape Town: The Gryphon Press.Google Scholar

LeCron Foster, Mary. 1978. The symbolic structure of primordial language. In: Washburn, S. L. and McCown, Elizabeth R. (eds.), Human Evolution: Biosocial Perspectives. Menlo Park, CA: The Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Company, 77‒121.Google Scholar

Lee, Sue Ann S. and Davis, Barbara L.. 2010. Segmental distribution patterns of English infant- and adult-directed speech. Journal of Child Language 37: 767–91.Google Scholar

Lehrer, Adrienne. 2003. Understanding trendy neologisms. Rivista di Linguistica 2: 369–82.Google Scholar

Lehrer, Adrienne. 2007. Blendalicious. In: Munat, Judith (ed.), Lexical Creativity, Texts and Contexts. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, 115–36.Google Scholar

Libben, Gary. 2010. Compound words, semantic transparency, and morphological transcendence. In: Olsen, Susan (ed.), New Impulses in Word-formation. Hamburg: Helmut Buske Verlag, 317–30.Google Scholar

Libben, G., Gibson, M., Yoon, Y. B. and Sandra, D.. 2003. Compound fracture: The role of semantic transparency and morphological headedness. Brain and Language 84: 50–64.Google Scholar

Lindstromberg, Seth and Boers, Frank. 2008a. The mnemonic effect of noticing alliteration in lexical chunks. Applied Linguistics 29 (2): 200–22.Google Scholar

Lindstrombeg, Seth and Boers, Frank. 2008b. Phonemic repetition and the learning of lexical chunks: The power of assonance. System 36: 423–36.Google Scholar

Long, D. L. and Graesser, A. C.. 1988. Wit and humor in discourse processing. Discourse Processes 11: 35–60.Google Scholar

Lorenz, Scott. 2013. Authors: use alliteration for illumination of your book title. The Book Publicist, 12 October 2013. https://book-publicist.com/2013/10/12/authors-use-alliteration-for-illumination-of-your-book-title; accessed 20 September 2018.Google Scholar

Louden, Mark L. 2000. Umlaut, ablaut and phonetic symbolism in German. General Linguistics 37: 1–22.Google Scholar

Lucy, John A. 1996. The scope of linguistic relativity: An analysis and review of empirical research. In: Gumperz, John J. and Levinson, Stephen (eds.), Rethinking Linguistic Relativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 37–69.Google Scholar

Maclean, M., Bryant, P. and Bradley, L.. 1987. Rhymes, nursery rhymes, and reading in early childhood. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly 33: 255–81.Google Scholar

MacNeilage, P. F. and Davis, B. L.. 2000. On the origin of internal structure of word forms. Science 288: 527–31.Google Scholar

Mair, Christian. 2006. Twentieth Century English: History, Variation, and Standardization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Malinowski, Bronislaw. 1966. Coral Gardens and Their Magic. Volume II: The Language of Magic and Gardening, 2nd edn. London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd.Google Scholar

Malkiel, Yakov. 1959. Studies in irreversible binomials. Lingua 8: 113–60.Google Scholar

Maltzman, I., Morrisett, L., Jr and Brooks, J. O.. 1956. An investigation of phonetic symbolism. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 53: 245–51.Google Scholar

Marantz, Alec. 1982. Re reduplication. Linguistic Inquiry 13 (3): 435–82.Google Scholar

Marchand, Hans. 1957. Motivation by linguistic form: English ablaut and rime combinations and their relevancy to word-formation. Studia Neophilologica 29: 54–67.Google Scholar

Marchand, Hans. 1959. Phonetic symbolism in English word-formation. Indogermanische Forschungen 64: 146–68.Google Scholar

Marchand, Hans. 1969. The Categories and Types of Present-Day English Word-Formation: A Synchronic-Diachronic Approach, 2nd revised edn. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.Google Scholar

Massaro, Dominic W. and Perlman, Marcus. 2017. Quantifying iconicity’s contribution during language acquisition: Implications for vocabulary learning. Frontiers in Communication 2 (4): 1–14.Google Scholar

Mattiello, Elisa. 2013. Extra-grammatical Morphology in English: Abbreviations, Blends, Reduplicatives, and Related Phenomena. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Maurer, D., Pathman, T. and Mondloch, C. J.. 2006. The shape of boubas: Sound-shape correspondences in toddlers and adults. Developmental Science 9: 316‒22.Google Scholar

McGlone, M. S. and Tofighbakhsh, J.. 2000. Birds of a feather flock conjointly (?): Rhyme as reason in aphorisms. Psychological Sciences 11 (5): 424–8.Google Scholar

Mehler, J., Jusczyk, P., Lambertz, G., Halsted, N., Bertoncini, J. and Amiel-Tison, C.. 1988. A precursor of language acquisition in young infants. Cognition 29 (2): 143–78.Google Scholar

Meier, Hans Heinrich. 1999. Imagination by ideophones. In: Nänny, Max and Fischer, Olga (eds.), Form Miming Meaning: Iconicity in Language and Literature. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, 135−54.Google Scholar

Meinard, Maruszka Eve Marie. 2015. Distinguishing onomatopoeias from interjections. Journal of Pragmatics 76: 150–68.Google Scholar

Menn, L. and Vihman, M.. 2011. Features in child phonology: Inherent, emergent, or artefacts of analysis? In Clements, N. and Ridouane, R. (eds.), Where Do Phonological Features Come From? The Nature and Sources of Phonological Primitives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 261–301.Google Scholar

Menninghaus, Winnifried, Bohrn, Isabel C., Knoop, Christine A., Kotz, Sonja A., Chlotz, Wolff and Jacobs, Arthur M.. 2015. Rhetorical features facilitate processing while handicapping ease of semantic comprehension. Cognition 143: 48–60.Google Scholar

Meyer, D. E., Schvaneveldt, R. W. and Ruddy, M. G.. 1975. Loci of contextual effects on visual word recognition. In: Rabbit, P. M. and Dornic, S. (eds.), Attention and Performance, Volume V. London: Academic Press, 98–118.Google Scholar

Meyer, H. E. A. 1879. Manner and customs of the Encounter Bay Tribe. In Woods, J. D. (ed), Native Tribes of South Australia. Adelaide: E. S. Wigg and Son, 183–206.Google Scholar

Miller, Darryl W. and Toman, Marshall. 2016. An analysis of rhetorical figures and other linguistic devices in corporation brand slogans. Journal of Marketing Communications 22 (5): 474–93.Google Scholar

Minkova, Donka. 2002. Ablaut reduplication in English: The criss-crossing of prosody and verbal art. English Language and Linguistics 6 (1): 133–69.Google Scholar

Minkova, Donka and Stockwell, Robert. 2009. English Words: History and Structure, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Mollin, Sandra. 2014. The (Ir)reversibility of English Binomials. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Moravcsik, Edith A. 1978. Reduplicative constructions. In: Greenberg, Joseph H. (ed.), Universals of Human Language. Volume 3: Word Structure. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 297–334.Google Scholar

Morton, Eugene S. 1994. Sound symbolism and its role in non-human vertebrate communication. In: Hinton, Leanne, Nichols, Johanna and Ohala, John J. (eds.), Sound Symbolism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 348–65.Google Scholar

Nagle, T. 2010. ‘There is much, very much, in the name of a book’ or, the famous title of Hobson-Jobson and how it got that way. In: Adams, Michael (ed.), Cunning Passages, Contrived Corridors: Unexpected Essays in the History of Lexicography. Monza: Polimetrica, 111–28.Google Scholar

Nash, David and Simpson, Jane. 1981. ‘No-name’ in Central Australia. In: Carrie S. Masek, Roberta A. Hendrik and Mary Frances Miller (eds.), Papers from the Parasession on Language and Behavior, Chicago Linguistic Society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago, 165–77.Google Scholar

Nekrasova, Tatiana M. 2009. English L₁ and L₂ speakers’ knowledge of lexical bundles. Language Learning 59 (3): 647–86.Google Scholar

Nevins, And rew and Vaux, Bert. 2003. Metalinguistic, shmetalinguistic: The phonology of shm- reduplication. Proceedings of the 39th Chicago Linguistics Society, 702–21.Google Scholar

Newman, Stanley S. 1933. Further experiments in phonetic symbolism. American Journal of Psychology 45: 53–75.Google Scholar

Newmeyer, Frederick J. 1992. Iconicity and generative grammar. Language 68 (4): 756–96.Google Scholar

Newmeyer, Frederick J. 2003. Grammar is grammar and usage is usage. Language 79: 682–707.Google Scholar

New Scientist. 2005. Malapropism for malapropism. 18 June 2005.Google Scholar

Nichols, J. 1971. Diminutive consonant symbolism in Western North America. Language 47: 826–48.Google Scholar

Norrick, Neal R. 1993. Conversational Joking: Humour in Everyday Talk. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Nuckolls, Janis B. 1999a. The structural indeterminacy of ideophones. Paper presented at the International Symposium of Ideophones, University of Cologne, 25–27 January 1999.Google Scholar

Nuckolls, Janis B. 1999b. The case for sound symbolism. Annual Review of Anthropology 28: 225–52.Google Scholar

Nygaard, Lynne C., Cook, Allison E. and Namy, Laura L.. 2009a. Sound to meaning correspondences facilitate word learning. Cognition 112: 181–6.Google Scholar

Nygaard, Lynne C., Herold, Debora S. and Namy, Laura L.. 2009b. The semantics of prosody: Acoustic and perceptual evidence of prosodic correlates to word meaning. Cognitive Science 33: 127–46.Google Scholar

Ogden, C. K. and Richards, A. I.. 1923. The Meaning of Meaning. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Ohala, John J. 1984. An ethological perspective on common cross-language utilization of FO of voice. Phonetica 41: 1–16.Google Scholar

Ohala, John J. 1994. The frequency code underlies the sound-symbolic use of voice pitch. In: Hinton, Leanne, Nichols, Johanna and Ohala, John J. (eds.), Sound Symbolism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 325–47.Google Scholar

Oller, D. K. 2000. The Emergence of the Speech Capacity. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates.Google Scholar

Ong, Walter J. 1982/2002. Orality and Literacy: The Technologizing of the World. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Opie, Iona and Opie, Peter. 1997. The Oxford Dictionary of Nursery Rhymes, 2nd edn. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Ostwald, Peter F. 1994. Some observations on the function of sound in clinical work. In: Hinton, Leanne, Nichols, Johanna and Ohala, John J. (eds.), Sound Symbolism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 309–24.Google Scholar

Oswalt, Robert L. 1994. Inanimate imitatives in English. In: Hinton, Leanne, Nichols, Johanna and Ohala, John J. (eds.), Sound Symbolism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 293–306.Google Scholar

Otis, Katya and Sagi, Eyal. 2008. Phonaesthemes: A corpus-based analysis. In: Love, B. C., McRae, K. and Sloutsky, V. M. (eds.), Proceedings of the 30th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society, 65–70.Google Scholar

Ourn, N. and Haiman, J.. 2000. Symmetrical compounds in Khmer. Studies in Language 24 (3): 483–514.Google Scholar

Ozturk, Ozge, Krehm, Madeleine and Vouloumanos, Athena. 2013. Sound symbolism in infancy: Evidence for sound‒shape cross-modal correspondences in 4-month-olds. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 114: 173‒86.Google Scholar

Palágyi, László and Benczes, Réka (2018). Virtual as real and real as virtual? Virtual reality as a metaphorical source domain. In: Uberman, Agnieszka and Dick-Bursztyn, Marta (eds.), Language in the New Millennium: Applied-linguistic and Cognitive-linguistic Considerations. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 127–51.Google Scholar

Palmer, Gary B., Thompson, Jennifer, Parkin, Jeffrey and Harmon, Elizabeth. 2014. The ceremonial origins of language. In: Yamaguchi, Masataka, Tay, Dennis and Blount, Benjamin (eds.), Approaches to Language, Culture and Cognition: The Intersection of Cognitive Linguistics and Linguistic Anthropology. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan, 145–77.Google Scholar

Pan, B. A., Rowe, M., Spier, E. and Tamis-Lemonda, C.. 2004. Measuring productive vocabulary of toddlers in low-income families: Concurrent and predictive. Journal of Child Language 31: 587–608.Google Scholar

Parault, Susan J. and Parkinson, Meghan. 2008. Sound symbolic word learning in the middle grades. Contemporary Educational Psychology 33 (4): 647‒71.Google Scholar

Parault, Susan J. and Schwanenflugel, Paula J.. 2006. Sound-symbolism: A piece in the puzzle of word learning. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 35: 329‒51.Google Scholar

Pawley, And rew and Syder, Frances Hodgetts. 1983. Two puzzles for linguistic theory: Nativelike selection and nativelike fluency. In: Richards, Jack C. and Schmidt, Richard W. (eds.), Language and Communication. London and New York: Longman, 191–227.Google Scholar

Peirce, Charles S. 1902/1955. Logic as semiotic: The theory of signs. In: Buchler, J. (ed.), Philosophical Writings. New York: Dover, 98–119.Google Scholar

Pelham, Brett W., Mirenberg, Matthew C. and Jones, John T.. 2002. Why Susie sells seashells by the seashore: Implicit egotism and major life decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 82: 469−87.Google Scholar

Perlman, Marcus, Fusaroli, Riccardo, Fein, Deborah and Naigles, Letitia. 2017. The use of iconic words in early child–parent interactions. In Gunzelmann, G., Howes, A., Tenbrink, T. and Davelaar, E. (eds.), Proceedings of the 39th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (CogSci 2017). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society, 913–8. http://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-002D-4BFB-A; accessed 14 September 2017.Google Scholar

Perniss, Pamela and Vigliocco, Gabriella. 2014. The bridge of iconicity: From a world of experience to the experience of language. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 369: 20130300. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0300; accessed 7 September 2017.Google Scholar

Perniss, Pamela, Thompson, Robin L. and Vigliocco, Gabriella. 2010. Iconicity as a general property of language: Evidence from spoken and signed languages. Frontiers in Psychology 1: Article 227.Google Scholar

Perry, Lynn K., Perlman, Marcus and Lupyan, Gary. 2015. Iconicity in English and Spanish and its relation to lexical category and age of acquisition. PLoS ONE 10 (9): e0137147.Google Scholar

Peterfalvi, J. M. 1970. Recherches expérimentales sur le symbolisme phonétique. American Journal of Psychology 65: 439–73.Google Scholar

Peters, Pam. 2007. Similes and other evaluative idioms in Australian English. In: Skandera, Paul (ed.), Phraseology and Culture in English. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 235–56.Google Scholar

Peterson, Robert A. and Ross, Ivan. 1972. How to name new brands. Journal of Advertising Research 12 (6): 29–34.Google Scholar

Philps, Dennis. 2011. Reconsidering phonesthemes: Submorphemic invariance in English ‘sn- words’. Lingua 121: 1121–37.Google Scholar

Piller, Ingrid. 1999. Iconicity in brand names. In: Nänny, Max and Fischer, Olga (eds.), Form Miming Meaning: Iconicity in Language and Literature. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, 325−44.Google Scholar

Pinker, Steven. 1995. The Language Instinct. New York: Harper Perennial.Google Scholar

Plag, Ingo. 2003. Word-formation in English. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Plato. Cratylus. http://perseus.uchicago.edu/perseus-cgi/citequery3.pl?dbname=GreekFeb2011&query=Pl.%20Cra.%20384b&getid=1; accessed 9 November 2017.Google Scholar

Pomerantz, Charlotte. 1974. The Piggy in the Puddle. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar

Preminger, Alex and Brogan, T. V. F.. 1993. The New Princeton Encyclopedia of Poetry and Poetics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Propp, Vladimir. 1968. Morphology of the Folk Tale. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar

Purcell, Susan. 2009. The law of Hobson-Jobson. English Today 97 (25/1): 60–4.Google Scholar

Pyles, Thomas and Algeo, John. 1982. The Origins and Development of the English Language. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar

Rabaglia, Cristina D., Maglio, Sam J., Krehm, Madeleine, Seok, Jin H. and Trope, Yaacov. 2016. The sound of distance. Cognition 152: 141–9.Google Scholar

Radden, Günter and Dirven, René. 2007. Cognitive English Grammar. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Radden, Günter and Panther, Klaus-Uwe. 2004. Introduction: Reflections on motivation. In: Radden, Günter and Panther, Klaus-Uwe (eds.), Studies in Linguistic Motivation. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 1−46.Google Scholar

Ramachandran, V. S. and Hubbard, E. M.. 2001. Synaesthesia: A window into perception, thought and language. Journal of Consciousness Studies 8: 3–34.Google Scholar

Rankin, J. W. 1921. Rhythm and rime before the Norman Conquest. PMLA 36 (3): 401–28.Google Scholar

Rapp, D. N. and Samuel, A. G.. 2002. A reason to rhyme: Phonological and semantic influences on lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 28 (3): 564–71.Google Scholar

Rastall, P. 2004. Playful English: Kinds of reduplication. English Today 80 (20): 38–41.Google Scholar

Reay, Irene Elizabeth. 2009. Sound symbolism. In: Allan, Keith (ed.), Concise Encyclopedia of Semantics. Oxford: Elsevier, 893−901.Google Scholar

Reber, Rob, Schwartz, Norbert and Winkielman, Piotr. 2004. Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: Is beauty in the perceiver’s processing experience? Personality and Social Psychology Review 8 (4): 364–82.Google Scholar

Reddy, Michael J. 1979. The conduit metaphor: A case of frame conflict in our language and thought. In: Ortony, A. (ed.), Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 284–310.Google Scholar

Reece, Bonnie B., Vanden Bergh, Bruce G. and Hairong, Li. 1994. What makes a slogan memorable and who remembers it. Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising 16 (2): 41–57.Google Scholar

Reilly, Jamie, Westbury, Chris, Kean, Jacob and Peale, Jonathan E.. 2012. Arbitrary symbolism in natural language revisited: When word forms carry meaning. PLoS ONE 7 (8): e42286.Google Scholar

Rhodes, Richard. 1994. Aural images. In: Hinton, Leanne, Nichols, Johanna and Ohala, John J. (eds.), Sound Symbolism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 276–92.Google Scholar

Rhodes, Richard A. and Lawler, John M.. 1981. Athematic metaphors. Chicago Linguistics Society 17: 318–42.Google Scholar

Ripollés, Pablo, Marco-Pallarés, Josep, Hielscher, Ulrike, Mestres-Missé, Anna, et al. 2014. The role of reward in word learning and its implications for language acquisition. Current Biology 24 (21): 2606–11.Google Scholar

Rosaldo, Michelle. 1973. I have nothing to hide: The language of Ilongot oratory. Language in Society 2: 193–223.Google Scholar

Rūke-Draviņa, Velta. 1976. Gibt es Universalien in der Ammensprache? Salzburger Beiträge zur Linguistik 2: 3–16.Google Scholar

Sackett, S. J. 1964. Poetry and folklore: Some points of affinity. Journal of American Folklore 77 (304): 143–53.Google Scholar

Sanders, And rew. 1994. The Short Oxford History of English Literature. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Sapir, Edward. 1921. Language: An Introduction to the Study of Speech. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company.Google Scholar

Sapir, Edward. 1929. A study in phonetic symbolism. Journal of Experimental Psychology 12: 225–39.Google Scholar

Sarvasy, Hannah. 2016. Warblish: Verbal mimicry of birdsong. Journal of Ethnobiology 36 (4): 765–82.Google Scholar

Saussure, Ferdinand de. 1916/1959. Course in General Linguistics. Ed. Bally, E., Sechehaye, A. and Riedlinger, A.. Translated by W. Baskin. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar

Savinainen-Makkonen, T. 2007. Geminate template: A model for first Finnish words. First Language 27: 347–59.Google Scholar

Scalise, Sergio. 1984. Generative Morphology. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar

Schloss, Ira. 1981. Chickens and pickles. Journal of Advertising Research 21: 47–9.Google Scholar

Schmid, Hans-Jörg. 2011. English Morphology and Word-formation, 2nd revised and translated edn. Berlin: Erich Schmidt Verlag.Google Scholar

Schwartz, Alvin. 1984. In a Dark, Dark Room and Other Scary Stories. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar

Sereno, Joan A. 1994. Phonosyntactics. In: Hinton, Leanne, Nichols, Johanna and Ohala, John J. (eds.), Sound Symbolism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 263–75.Google Scholar

Sherman, Donald. 1975. Noun–verb stress alternation: An example of lexical diffusion sound change in English. Linguistics 159: 43–71.Google Scholar

Sherzer, Joel. 1987. A discourse-centered approach to language and culture. American Anthropologist 89 (2): 295–309.Google Scholar

Sherzer, Joel. 2002. Speech Play and Verbal Art. Austin, TX: University of Texas.Google Scholar

Shrum, L. J., Lowrey, T. M., Luna, David, Lerman, D. B. and Liu, Min. 2012. Sound symbolism effects across languages: Implications for global brand names. International Journal of Research in Marketing 29: 275–79.Google Scholar

Silverstein, Michael. 1994. Relative motivation in denotational and indexical sound symbolism of Wasco-Wishram Chinookan. In: Hinton, Leanne, Nichols, Johanna and Ohala, John J. (eds.), Sound Symbolism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 40–60.Google Scholar

Simone, Raffaele. 1995. Foreword: Under the sign of Cratylus. In: Simone, Raffaele (ed.), Iconicity in Language. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, vii–xi.Google Scholar

Simpson, Jane. 2016. Constrained creativity: Towards a natural history of language in (English language) fantasy novels. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Australian Linguistics Society, Monash University, Melbourne, 8 December 2016.Google Scholar

Skorupa, Pavel and Tatjana, Dubovičienė. 2015. Linguistic characteristics of commercial and social advertising slogans. Santalka: Filologija, Edukologija 23 (2): 108–18.Google Scholar

Smith, Chris. 2014. The phonesthetics of blends. A lexicographic study of cognitive blends in the OED. ExELL: Explorations in English Language and Linguistics 2 (1): 12–45.Google Scholar

Sørensen, J. 2007. A Cognitive Theory of Magic. Lanham, MD: Altamira Press.Google Scholar

Soudek, L. J. 1978. The relation of blending to English word-formation: Theory, structure and typological attempts. In: Dressler, W. U. and Meid, W. (eds.), Proceedings of the Twelfth International Congress of Linguists, Vienna, August 28–September 2, 1977. Innsbruck: Innsbrucker Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft.Google Scholar

Spencer, And rew. 1991. Morphological Theory: An Introduction to Word Structure in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Štekauer, Pavol. 1998. An Onomasiological Theory of English Word-formation. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Štekauer, Pavol, Valera, Salvador and Lívia, Körtvélyessy. 2012. Word-formation in the World’s Languages: A Typological Survey. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Stollznow, Karen. 2014. Language Myths, Mysteries and Magic. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Sturtevant, E. H. 1947. An Introduction to Linguistic Science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Styles, Suzy J. and Gawne, Lauren. 2017. When does maluma/takete fail? Two key failures and a meta-analysis suggest that phonology and phonotactics matter. i-Perception 8 (4): 1–17.Google Scholar

Szabó, Lilla P. 2014. How does bling-bling ring? A corpus-based study of rhyming and alliterating compounds. MA thesis, Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest.Google Scholar

Tambiah, S. J. 1968. The magical power of words. Man: The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 3 (2): 175–208.Google Scholar

Tannen, Deborah. 2007. Talking Voices: Repetition, Dialogue, and Imagery in Conversational Discourse, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Tardif, Twila, Fletcher, Paul, Liang, Weilan, Zhang, Zhixiang, Kaciroti, Niko and Marchman, Virginia. 2008. Baby’s first 10 words. Developmental Psychology 44 (4): 929–38.Google Scholar

Taylor, John R. 2002. Cognitive Grammar. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Thompson, Ray. 1980. Roy Crane: Pioneer adventure strip cartoonist. The Courier 17 (1): 3–13.Google Scholar

Thompson, Robin L., Vinson, David P. and Vigliocco, Gabriella. 2009. The link between form and meaning in American Sign Language: Lexical processing effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Memory and Cognition 35: 550–7.Google Scholar

Thun, Nils. 1963. Reduplicative Words in English: A Study of Formations of the Types Tick-tick, Hurly-burly, and Shilly-shally. Monograph. Uppsala.Google Scholar

Thurlow, Crispin. 2011. Determined creativity: Language play in new media discourse. In: Jones, R. (ed.), Discourse and Creativity. London: Pearson, 169–90.Google Scholar

Tiersma, Peter M. 1999. Legal Language. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Toolan, Michael. 2005. Joke shop names. Journal of Literary Semantics 34 (2): 165–79.Google Scholar

Tsur, Reuven. 2001. Onomatopoeia: Cuckoo-language and tick-tocking. The constraints of semiotic systems. Cogprints. http://cogprints.org/3232; accessed 14 July 2016.Google Scholar

Ullmann, Stephen. 1962. Semantics: An Introduction to the Science of Meaning. New York: Barnes and Noble.Google Scholar

Ultan, R. 1978. Size-sound symbolism. In: Greenberg, Joseph (ed.), Universals of Human Language. Volume II: Phonology. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 525–68.Google Scholar

Ungerer, Friedrich and Schmid, Hans-Jörg. 1996/2006. An Introduction to Cognitive Linguistics, 2nd edn. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Urbanczyk, Suzanne. 2005. Enhancing contrast in reduplication. Reduplication in child language. In Hurch, Bernard (ed.), Studies on Reduplication. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 211–38.Google Scholar

Vanden Bergh, Bruce G., Collins, Janay, Schultz, Myrna and Adler, Keith. 1984. Sound advice on brand names. Journalism Quarterly 61 (4): 835–40.Google Scholar

Van Meter, Jan R. 2009. Tippecanoe and Tyler Too: Famous Slogans and Catchphrases in American History. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Vihman, Marilyn May (in prep.). Phonological Templates in Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Vihman, Marilyn May. 1976. From prespeech to speech: On early phonology. Stanford Papers and Reports on Child Language Development 12: 230–44.Google Scholar

Vihman, Marilyn May. 1981. Phonology and the development of the lexicon: Evidence from children’s errors. Journal of Child Language 8: 239–64.Google Scholar

Vihman, Marilyn May. 1993. Variable paths to early word production. Journal of Phonetics 21: 61–82.Google Scholar

Vihman, Marilyn May. 2014. Phonological Development: The First Two Years, 2nd edn. Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar

Vihman, Marilyn May. 2016. Phonological templates in development. Oxford Research Encyclopedia for Linguistics. http://linguistics.oxfordre.com/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.001.0001/acrefore-9780199384655-e-99; DOI: 10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.9.Google Scholar

Vihman, Marilyn May. 2017. Learning words and learning sounds: Advances in language development. British Journal of Psychology 108: 1–27.Google Scholar

Vihman, Marilyn May and Croft, William. 2007. Phonological development: Toward a ‘radical’ templatic phonology. Linguistics 45: 683–725.Google Scholar

Vihman, Marilyn May, Keren-Portnoy, Tamar, Whitaker, Christopher, Bidgood, Amy and Michelle, McGillon. 2013. Late-talking toddlers: Relating early phonological development to later language advance. York Papers in Linguistics 13: 47–69.Google Scholar

Vitevitch, Michael S. 2002. Naturalistic and experimental analyses of word frequency and neighbourhood density effects in slips of the ear. Language and Speech 45 (4): 407–34.Google Scholar

Vouloumanos, A. and Werker, J. F.. 2007. Listening to language at birth: Evidence for a bias for speech in neonates. Developmental Science 10 (2): 159–71.Google Scholar

Wales, Katie. 1989. A Dictionary of Stylistics. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar

Waugh, Linda R. 1980. The poetic function in the theory of Roman Jakobson. Poetics Today 2 (1a): 57‒82.Google Scholar

Waugh, Linda R. 1992. Let’s take the ‘con’ out of iconicity: Constraints on iconicity in the lexicon. The American Journal of Semiotics 9 (1): 7–48.Google Scholar

Waugh, Linda R. and Newfield, Madeleine. 1995. Iconicity in the lexicon and its relevance for a theory of morphology. In: Landsberg, Marge E. (ed.), Syntactic Iconicity and Linguistic Freezes: The Human Dimension. Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter, 189–221.Google Scholar

Weir, R. H. 1962. Language in the Crib. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar

Wierzbicka, Anna. 1991. Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: The Semantics of Human Interaction. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Williams, Fionnuala Carson. 2011. Alliteration in English-language versions of current widespread European proverbs and idioms. In: Roper, Jonathan (ed.), Alliteration in Culture. Palgrave Macmillan, 34–44.Google Scholar

Wiltshire, Caroline and Marantz, Alec. 2000. Reduplication. In: Booij, Geert, Lehmann, Christian and Mugdan, Joachim (eds.), Morphologie/Morphology: Ein internationales Handbuch zur Flexion und Wortbildung /An International Handbook on Inflection and Word Formation, Volume 1. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 557–67.Google Scholar

Wray, A. 2002. Formulaic Language and the Lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Wright, Sylvia. 1954. The death of Lady Mondegreen. Harper’s Magazine 209: 48–51.Google Scholar

Yule, Henry and Burnell, Arthur C. (eds.). 1886. Hobson-Jobson: A Glossary of Anglo-Indian Colloquial Words and Phrases, and of Kindred Terms; Etymological, Historical, Geographical and Discursive. London: John Murray.Google Scholar

Zack, Naomi. 2005. Race and racial discrimination. In: LaFollette, Hugh (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Practical Ethics. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 245–71.Google Scholar

Zimmer, Benjamin. 2006. The surreptitious history of -licious. Language Log, 5 September 2006. http://itre.cis.upenn.edu/~myl/languagelog/archives/003546.html; accessed 25 October 2016.Google Scholar

Zwicky, Arnold M. and Pullum, Geoffrey K.. 1987. Plain morphology and expressive morphology. In: Aske, Jon, Beery, Natasha, Michaelis, Laura and Filip, Hana (eds.), Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: General Session and Parasession on Grammar and Cognition. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society, 330–40.Google Scholar

Collins English Dictionary Online. www.collinsdictionary.comGoogle Scholar

Dictionary.com www.dictionary.comGoogle Scholar

Free Dictionary, The www.thefreedictionary.comGoogle Scholar

Oxford English Dictionary, The www.oed.comGoogle Scholar

Oxford Living Dictionaries https://en.oxforddictionaries.comGoogle Scholar

Project Gutenberg www.gutenberg.orgGoogle Scholar

Urban Dictionary www.urbandictionary.comGoogle Scholar

Wordspy www.wordspy.comGoogle Scholar

Collins English Dictionary Online. www.collinsdictionary.comGoogle Scholar

Dictionary.com www.dictionary.comGoogle Scholar

Free Dictionary, The www.thefreedictionary.comGoogle Scholar

Oxford English Dictionary, The www.oed.comGoogle Scholar

Oxford Living Dictionaries https://en.oxforddictionaries.comGoogle Scholar

Project Gutenberg www.gutenberg.orgGoogle Scholar

Urban Dictionary www.urbandictionary.comGoogle Scholar

Wordspy www.wordspy.comGoogle Scholar