Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T03:45:17.353Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - The Superiority of the Extended Republic

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 July 2009

Calvin H. Johnson
Affiliation:
University of Texas, Austin
Get access

Summary

MADISON'S GRAND THEORY

In preparation for the convention, Madison abstracted beyond the immediate events and his comparative studies to conclude that the general-level government – the extended republic – would inevitably be superior to state governments, as a matter of fundamental philosophy. The theory of the superiority of the extended sphere was developed first in his Vices of the Political System; was continued in letters to Washington, Randolph, and especially Jefferson, and in the Philadelphia Convention; and then was published in the famous Federalist Number 10.

Madison sought to “prove in contradiction to the concurrent opinions of theoretical writers,” that the republican form of government must operate not within a small but within an extensive sphere. In Madison's vision, republican passions and selfish interests within the smaller states had trampled the general or national welfare and individual rights. Diversification of interests, found only in an extended republic, would moderate the effect of passions and selfish interests. In any representative democracy, Madison argued, the elected officials properly represent the passions and the selfish interests of people. The interests of people are diverse:

Those who contend for a simple Democracy … operating within narrow limits, assume or suppose a case which is altogether fictitious. They found their reasoning on the idea, that the people composing the Society, enjoy not only an equality of political rights; but that they have all precisely the same interests, and the same feelings in every respect. Were this in reality the case, their reasoning would be conclusive. The interest of the majority would be that of the minority also, the decision could only turn on mere opinion concerning the good of the whole. […]

Type
Chapter
Information
Righteous Anger at the Wicked States
The Meaning of the Founders' Constitution
, pp. 61 - 73
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×