Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-03T06:19:01.226Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Two Previous Standard Models

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 February 2010

J. L. Heilbron
Affiliation:
Born San Francisco, California, 1934; Ph.D., 1964 (history of science), University of California at Berkeley; Professor of History and the History of Science, and Vice-Chancellor, University of California at Berkeley.
Lillian Hoddeson
Affiliation:
University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
Laurie Brown
Affiliation:
Northwestern University, Illinois
Michael Riordan
Affiliation:
Stanford University, California
Max Dresden
Affiliation:
Stanford University, California
Get access

Summary

Having slipped so far down the chain of being – from physicist to historian to administrator – I was very much flattered by the invitation to contribute this chapter. I shall not abuse the invitation by discussing the Standard Model itself, for you all know much more about it than I do. Instead I shall discuss two earlier physical theories (or, rather, sets of theories) that may be considered standard models of their times. My purpose is not to place the modern version in perspective – for what larger setting is possible for a theory that covers all time and all space? My purpose is to remind you that others have had the same intellectual impulses that drive contemporary particle physicists and cosmologists, and that they could point to persuasive evidence in support of their own standard models.

To qualify as a discarded standard model, a theory must have been deemed fundamental and universal; also, it must have enjoyed a wide consensus among physicists and produced quantitative results testable by experiment. These criteria are satisfied by two, and perhaps only two, previous models, which I'll call the Napoleonic and the Victorian.

The Napoleonic standard model

I call the standard model of the years around 1800 Napoleonic, not because he had anything to do with creating it, but because he patronized its principal architects, because it rose and fell coincidentally with his own career, and because it operated with the same mixture of the aristocratic and the democratic, the chauvinistic and the cosmopolitan, that characterized his regime.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Rise of the Standard Model
A History of Particle Physics from 1964 to 1979
, pp. 45 - 54
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Two Previous Standard Models
    • By J. L. Heilbron, Born San Francisco, California, 1934; Ph.D., 1964 (history of science), University of California at Berkeley; Professor of History and the History of Science, and Vice-Chancellor, University of California at Berkeley.
  • Edited by Lillian Hoddeson, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, Laurie Brown, Northwestern University, Illinois, Michael Riordan, Stanford University, California, Max Dresden, Stanford University, California
  • Book: The Rise of the Standard Model
  • Online publication: 03 February 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511471094.005
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Two Previous Standard Models
    • By J. L. Heilbron, Born San Francisco, California, 1934; Ph.D., 1964 (history of science), University of California at Berkeley; Professor of History and the History of Science, and Vice-Chancellor, University of California at Berkeley.
  • Edited by Lillian Hoddeson, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, Laurie Brown, Northwestern University, Illinois, Michael Riordan, Stanford University, California, Max Dresden, Stanford University, California
  • Book: The Rise of the Standard Model
  • Online publication: 03 February 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511471094.005
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Two Previous Standard Models
    • By J. L. Heilbron, Born San Francisco, California, 1934; Ph.D., 1964 (history of science), University of California at Berkeley; Professor of History and the History of Science, and Vice-Chancellor, University of California at Berkeley.
  • Edited by Lillian Hoddeson, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, Laurie Brown, Northwestern University, Illinois, Michael Riordan, Stanford University, California, Max Dresden, Stanford University, California
  • Book: The Rise of the Standard Model
  • Online publication: 03 February 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511471094.005
Available formats
×