Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T10:41:56.885Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

23 - Fugitive Emissions from Coal Seam Gas Production

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 January 2017

R. Quentin Grafton
Affiliation:
Australian National University, Canberra
Ian G. Cronshaw
Affiliation:
Australian National University, Canberra
Michal C. Moore
Affiliation:
University of Calgary
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Risks, Rewards and Regulation of Unconventional Gas
A Global Perspective
, pp. 467 - 483
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, D.T. Torres, V.M., Thomas, J., Sullivan, D.W., Harrison, M., Hendler, A., et al. (2013). Measurements of methane emissions at natural gas production sites in the United States. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 110, 1802318024.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alverez, A.A., Pacala, S.W., Winebrake, J.J., Chameides, W.L., Hamburg, S.P. (2012). Greater focus needed on methane leakage from natural gas infrastructure. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 109, 64356440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
API (2009). Compendium of Greenhouse Gas Emissions Methodologies for the Oil and Natural Gas Industry. American Petroleum Institute, Washington DC.Google Scholar
Broomfield, M., Donovan, B. (2012). Monitoring and control of fugitive methane from unconventional gas operations. United Kingdom Environment Agency, Bristol. http://cdn.environment-agency.gov.uk/scho0812buwk-e-e.pdf.Google Scholar
Brandt, A.R., Heath, G.A., Kort, E.A., O'Sullivan, F., Pétron, G., et al. (2014). Methane leaks from North American natural gas systems. Science 343, 733735.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carras, J.N., Thomson, C.T., Williams, D.J. (1991). Measurement of methane fluxes in urban plumes. Seventh Joint Conference on Applications of Air Pollution Meteorology with AWMA, Jan. 14-18, 1991, New Orleans, La. Boston, Mass.: American Meteorological Society.Google Scholar
Cathles, L. (2012). Assessing the greenhouse impact of natural gas. Geochemisty, Geophysics, Geosystems 13, Q06013.Google Scholar
Cathles, L., Brown, L., Team, M., Hunter, A. (2012). A commentary on ‘The greenhouse-gas footprint of natural gas in shale formations’ by R.W. Howarth, R. Santoro and Anthony Ingraffea. Climatic Change 113, 525535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caulton, D.R., Shepson, P.B., Santoro, R.L., Sparks, J.P., Howarth, R.H., Ingraffea, A.R. et al. (2014). Toward a better understanding and quantification of methane emissions from shale gas development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 111, 62376242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cipolla, C., Lewis, R., Maxwell, S., Mack, M. (2012). Appraising unconventional resource plays: separating reservoir quality from completion effectiveness. IPTC 14677. In Proc. International Petroleum Technology Conference, Bangkok, Thailand.Google Scholar
Darrah, T.H., Vengosh, A., Jackson, R.B., Warner, N.R., Poreda, R.J. (2014). Noble gases identify the mechanisms of fugitive gas contamination in drinking-water wells overlying the Marcellus and Barnett Shales. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science Early Edition. www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1322107111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Day, S., Dell'Amico, M., Fry, R., Javanmard Tousi, H. (2014). Field measurements of fugitive emissions from equipment and well casings in Australian coal seam gas production facilities. 41 pp. CSIRO, Australia.Google Scholar
DEEDI (2011a). Coal seam gas well head safety program. Final Report. Department of Employment, Economic Development and Innovation, Queensland. http://mines.industry.qld.gov.au/assets/petroleum-pdf/Coal-Seam-Gas-Well-Head-Safety-Program-Inspection-Report-2011.pdf.Google Scholar
DEEDI (2011b). Code of practice for coal seam gas well head emissions detection and reporting. Department of Employment, Economic Development and Innovation, Queensland. http://mines.industry.qld.gov.au/assets/petroleum-pdf/code_practice_well_leak_class.pdf.Google Scholar
Denmead, O.T. (2008). Approaches to measuring fluxes of methane and nitrous oxide between landscapes and the atmosphere. Plant Soil 309, 524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Department of the Environment (2015). National Inventory Report 2013. Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra. http://www.environment.gov.au/climate-change/greenhouse-gas-measurement/publications/national-inventory-report-2013.Google Scholar
DNRM (2015). Queensland's petroleum and coal seam gas 2013–14. Department of Natural Resources and Mines, Queensland. (https://www.dnrm.qld.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0020/238124/petroleum.pdf).Google Scholar
Duffy, M., Kinnaman, F.S., Valentine, D.L., Keller, E.A., Clark, J.F. (2007). Gaseous emission rates from natural petroleum seeps in the Upper Ojai Valley, California. Environmental Geosciences 14, 197207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
EIA (2014). Annual energy outlook 2014. US Energy Information Administration, Washington DC. http://www.eia.gov/forecasts/aeo/pdf/0383%282014%29.pdf.Google Scholar
Erno, B., Schmitz, R. (1996). Measurements of soil gas migration around oil and gas wells in the Lloydminster area. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology 35, 3746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Etiope, G., Drobniak, A., Schimmelmann, A. (2013). Natural seepage of shale gas and the origin of the ‘eternal flames’ in the Norther Appalacian Basin, USA. Marine and Petroleum Geology 43, 178186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grudnoff, M. (2012). Measuring fugitive emissions: is coal seam gas a viable bridging fuel? Policy Brief No 41, The Australia Institute, Canberra. https://www.tai.org.au/index.php?q=node%2F19&pubid=1032&act=display.Google Scholar
Hardisty, P.E., Clark, T.S., Hynes, R.G. (2012). Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions from electricity generation: a comparative analysis of Australian energy sources. Energies 5, 872897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haydell, M. (2001). Unaccounted-for gas. In Proc. American School of Gas Measurement Technology, pp. 148–153. http://www.asgmt.com/default/papers/asgmt2002/docs/21.pdf.Google Scholar
Hirst, B., Gibson, G., Gillespie, S., Archibald, I., Podlaha, O., Skeldon, K.D., et al. (2004). Oil and gas prospecting by ultra-sensitive optical gas detection with inverse gas dispersion modelling. Geophysical Research Letter 31, L12115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, N. S., Morawskw, L. (2006). A review of dispersion modelling and its application to the dispersion of particles: an overview of different dispersion models available. Atmospheric Environment 40, 59025928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howarth, R., Santoro, R., Ingraffea, A. (2011). Methane and the greenhouse-gas footprint of natural gas from shale formations. Climatic Change 106, 679690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humphries, R., Jenkins, C., Leuning, R., Zegelin, S., Griffith, D., Caldow, C. et al. (2012). Atmospheric tomography: a Bayesian inversion technique for determining the rate and location of fugitive emissions. Environmental Science and Technology 46, 7391746.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Iverach, C., Lowry, D., France, J., Fisher, R., Nisbet, E., Baker, A. et al. (2014). The complexities of continuous air monitoring in attributing methane to sources of production. In Proc. Australian Earth Sciences Convention, Newcastle, Australia July 7–10. Geological Society of Australia.Google Scholar
Jaramillo, P., Griffin, W.M., Matthews, H.S. (2007). Comparative life-cycle air emissions of coal, domestic natural gas, LNG, and SNG for electricity generation. Environmental Science and Technology 41, 62906296.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Karion, A., Sweeney, C., Pétron, G., Frost, G., Hardesty, R.M., Kofler, J. et al. (2013). Methane emissions estimate from airborne measurements over a western United States natural gas field. Geophysical Research Letters 40, 43934397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirchgessner, D.A., Lott, R.A., Cowgill, R.M., Harrison, M.R., Shires, T.M. (1997). Estimate of methane emissions from the US natural gas industry. Chemosphere 35, 13651390.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klusman, R.W. (1993). Soil Gas and Related Methods for Natural Resource Exploration. Wiley, Chichester, UK.Google Scholar
Kort, E.A., Frankenberg, C., Costigan, K.R., Lindenmaier, R., Dubey, M.K., Wunch, D. (2014). Four corners: the largest US methane anomaly viewed from space. Geophysical Research Letters 41, 68986903, doi:10.1002/2014GL061503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leuning, R., Etheridge, D., Luhar, A., Dunse, B. (2008). Atmospheric monitoring and verification technologies for CO2 geosequestration. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 79, 14.Google Scholar
Loh, Z., Leuning, R., Zegelin, S.J., Etheridge, D.M., Bai, M., Naylor, T., Griffith, D. (2009). Testing Lagrangian atmospheric dispersion modelling to monitor CO2 and CH4 leakage from Geosequestration. Atmospheric Environment 43 (16), 26022611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LTE (2007). Phase II Raton Basin gas seep investigation Las Animas and Huerfano Counties, Colorado. Project No. 1925, Oil and Gas Conservation Response Fund. (http://cogcc.state.co.us/documents/library/AreaReports/RatonBasin/PhaseII/Phase%2011%20Seep%20Investigation%20Final%20Report.pdf, accessed 4 August 2106).Google Scholar
Luhar, A.K., Etheridge, D.M., Leuning, R., Loh, Z.M., Jenkins, C.R., Yee, E. (2014). Locating and quantifying greenhouse gas emissions at a geological CO2 storage site using atmospheric modeling and measurements. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 119, doi:10.1002/2014JD021880.Google Scholar
McJeon, H., Edmonds, J., Bauer, N., Clarke, L., Fisher, B., Flannery, B.P. et al. (2014). Limited impact on decadal-scale climate change from increased use of natural gas. Nature 514, 482.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, S.M., Wofsya, S.C., Michalak, A.M., Kort, E.A., Andrews, A.E., Biraude, S.C. et al. (2013). Anthropogenic emissions of methane in the United States. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 110, 2001820022.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moore, T.A. (2012). Coalbed methane: a review. International Journal of Coal Geology 101, 3681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nisbet, E., Weiss, R. (2010). Top-down versus bottom-up. Science 328, 1241.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
NSW Chief Scientist and Engineer (2014). Independent Review of Coal Seam Gas Activities in NSW Information Paper: Fracture stimulation activities. NSW Government, Australia. http://www.chiefscientist.nsw.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0008/56924/140930-Final-Fracture-Stimulation.pdf.Google Scholar
O'Sullivan, F., Paltsev, S. (2012). Shale gas production: potential versus actual greenhouse gas emissions. Environmental Research Letters 7, 044030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pétron, G., Frost, G., Miller, B.R., Hirsch, A.I., Montzka, S.A., Karion, A. et al. (2012). Hydrocarbon emissions characterization in the Colorado Front Range: a pilot study. Journal of Geophysical Research – Atmospheres 117. D04304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, N.G., Ackley, R., Crosson, E.R., Down, A., Hutyra, L., Brondfield, M. et al. (2013). Mapping urban pipeline leaks: methane leaks across Boston. Environmental Pollution 173, 14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saghafi, A. (2010). Potential for ECBM and CO2 storage in mixed gas Australian coals. International Journal of Coal Geology 82, 240251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneising, O., Burrows, J.P., Dickerson, R.R., Buchwitz, M., Reuter, M., Bovensmann, H. (2014). Remote sensing of fugitive methane emissions from oil and gas production in North American tight geologic formations. Earth's Future 2, 548558, doi:10.1002/2014EF000265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tait, D.R., Santos, I. Maher, D.T., Cyronak, T.J., Davis, R.J. (2013). Enrichment of radon and carbon dioxide in the open atmosphere of an Australian coal seam gas field. Environmental Science and Technology 47, 30993104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tsai, T., Rella, C., Crosson, E. (2013). Quantification of fugitive methane emissions with spatially correlated measurements collected with novel plume camera. Geophysical Research Abstracts 15, EGU2013-11020. EGU General Assembly 2013.Google Scholar
USEPA (1995). Protocol for Equipment Leak Emission Rates. US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington DC.Google Scholar
Wigley, T. (2011). Coal to gas: the influence of methane leakage. Climatic Change 108, 601608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zazzeri., G., Lowry, D., Fisher, R.E., France, J.L., Lanoisellé, M., Nisbet, E.G. (2015). Plume mapping and isotopic characterisation of anthropogenic methane sources. Atmospheric Environment 110, 151162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×