Book contents
- Risks, Rewards and Regulation of Unconventional GasA Global Perspective
- Risks, Rewards and Regulation of Unconventional Gas
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Preface
- Acknowledgements
- 1 The Rise of Unconventional Gas: The Story So Far
- 2 Geopolitical Dimensions of Global Unconventional Gas Perspectives
- 3 Unconventional Gas Development in Asia–Pacific: Looking for Common Ground
- 4 Unconventional Hydrocarbons and the US Technology Revolution
- 5 Risks and Opportunities of Unconventional Natural Gas: Australia and the United States
- 6 Economics of Shale Gas in the United States
- 7 Unconventional Natural Gas in China
- 8 The Argentinian Approach for Developing Unconventional Gas Resources
- 9 Unconventional Gas in the United Kingdom
- 10 Alberta Natural Gas – Landlocked Largesse
- 11 Managing the Regulatory Risk of Unconventional Natural Gas
- 12 Regulation of Unconventional Gas in Colombia
- 13 Regulation of Unconventional Gas in India
- 14 Failure to Frack: Pitfalls of Governance and Risk in Polish Shale Gas
- 15 Unconventional Gas Regulation in Australia and the US: Case Studies of Four Jurisdictions
- 16 Regulation of Unconventional Hydrocarbons in Alberta, Canada
- 17 When Unconventional Becomes Conventional: Regulation of Natural Gas Development in British Columbia, Canada
- 18 Leading Practice Regulation for Unconventional Reservoir Development in South Australia
- 19 Best Practice for Community Engagement: Determining Who is Affected and What is at Stake
- 20 Managing the Impact of Coal Seam Gas Water Extraction in the Surat Basin
- 21 Whole-of-Landscape Assessment and Planning in the Management of Unconventional Gas Exploration and Production in Australia
- 22 Unconventional Energy in British Columbia: A Post-Tsilhqot'in View
- 23 Fugitive Emissions from Coal Seam Gas Production
- Appendix: Units
- Glossary and Acronyms
- Index
- References
11 - Managing the Regulatory Risk of Unconventional Natural Gas
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 January 2017
Book contents
- Risks, Rewards and Regulation of Unconventional GasA Global Perspective
- Risks, Rewards and Regulation of Unconventional Gas
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Preface
- Acknowledgements
- 1 The Rise of Unconventional Gas: The Story So Far
- 2 Geopolitical Dimensions of Global Unconventional Gas Perspectives
- 3 Unconventional Gas Development in Asia–Pacific: Looking for Common Ground
- 4 Unconventional Hydrocarbons and the US Technology Revolution
- 5 Risks and Opportunities of Unconventional Natural Gas: Australia and the United States
- 6 Economics of Shale Gas in the United States
- 7 Unconventional Natural Gas in China
- 8 The Argentinian Approach for Developing Unconventional Gas Resources
- 9 Unconventional Gas in the United Kingdom
- 10 Alberta Natural Gas – Landlocked Largesse
- 11 Managing the Regulatory Risk of Unconventional Natural Gas
- 12 Regulation of Unconventional Gas in Colombia
- 13 Regulation of Unconventional Gas in India
- 14 Failure to Frack: Pitfalls of Governance and Risk in Polish Shale Gas
- 15 Unconventional Gas Regulation in Australia and the US: Case Studies of Four Jurisdictions
- 16 Regulation of Unconventional Hydrocarbons in Alberta, Canada
- 17 When Unconventional Becomes Conventional: Regulation of Natural Gas Development in British Columbia, Canada
- 18 Leading Practice Regulation for Unconventional Reservoir Development in South Australia
- 19 Best Practice for Community Engagement: Determining Who is Affected and What is at Stake
- 20 Managing the Impact of Coal Seam Gas Water Extraction in the Surat Basin
- 21 Whole-of-Landscape Assessment and Planning in the Management of Unconventional Gas Exploration and Production in Australia
- 22 Unconventional Energy in British Columbia: A Post-Tsilhqot'in View
- 23 Fugitive Emissions from Coal Seam Gas Production
- Appendix: Units
- Glossary and Acronyms
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Risks, Rewards and Regulation of Unconventional GasA Global Perspective, pp. 224 - 232Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2016
References
An, Y.-J., Kampbell, D.H., Sewell, G.W., 2002. Water quality at five marinas in Lake Texoma as related to methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE). Environmental pollution 118 (3), 331–336.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Christopherson, S., Richtor, N., 2012. How shale gas extraction affects drilling localities; lessons for regional and city policy makers, Journal of Town and City Management 2(4); Henry Stewart Publications, London.Google Scholar
Cox, L.A., 2013. Improving causal inferences in risk analysis, Risk Analysis 33 (10).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Graham, J.D., Rupp, J., Schenk, O. (2014). Unconventional gas development in the USA: exploring the risk perception issues. Conference paper, Harvard School of Public Health, Harvard Center for Risk Analysis.Google Scholar
Grasso, J.-R., 1992. Mechanics of seismic instabilities induced by the recovery of hydrocarbons. Pure and Applied Geophysics 139, 3–4, 507–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, R. et al., 2000. MTBE – to what extent will past releases contaminate community water supply wells?, Environmental Science & Technology 34 (9), 210A–217A.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keranen, K., Savage, H.M., Abers, G.A., Cochran, E.S., 2013. Potentially induced earthquakes in Oklahoma, USA: links between wastewater injection and the 2011 Mw 5.7 earthquake sequence, GeoScienceWorld 41 (6), 699–702.Google Scholar
Keranen, K., Weingarten, M., Abers, G.A., Bekins, B., Ge, S., 2014. Sharp increase since 2008 induced by massive wastewater injection. Science 345 (6195), 448–451.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, W.‐Y., 2013. Induced seismicity associated with fluid injection into a deep well in Youngstown, Ohio. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth 118 (7), 3506–3518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Majer, E.L. et al., 2007. Induced seismicity associated with enhanced geothermal systems. Geothermics 36 (3), 185–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shrader-Frechette, K.S., 1991. Risk and Rationality: Philosophical Foundations for Populist Reforms. University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Small, M.J. et al., 2014. Risks and risk governance in unconventional shale gas development, environmental science and technology, Special Issue: Understanding the Risks of Unconventional Shale Gas Development, 48, 8289–8297, 1 July 1 2014.Google Scholar
Wiseman, H., 2014. The capacity of state institutions to govern shale gas development risks. Environmental Science and Technology, DOI: 10.1021/es4052582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zoback, M.A., 2012. Managing the seismic risk posed by wastewater disposal, Earth Magazine, April 2012.Google Scholar