Book contents
- The Role of Lawyers in Access to Justice
- The Role of Lawyers in Access to Justice
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Epigraph
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Appendices
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- 1 Understanding and Comparing Access to Justice
- Part I Access to Justice in Asia
- 2 Pro Bono, Legal Aid, and the Struggle for Justice in China
- 3 Access to Justice in India: Managing Multiple Mechanisms in a Restrictive Practice Environment
- 4 Access to Justice in Indonesia: Searching for Meaning
- 5 Access to Justice and Lawyer Independence in Japan
- I. Introduction
- II. Historical Background of the Commitment to Public Interest Activities
- III. Individual and Organized Forms of Public Interest Activities and Their Mutual Relationships
- IV. Mandatory Rules on Public Interest Activities
- V. Conclusion
- Appendix 5.1 The Rule on Association Affairs and Other Matters
- Appendix 5.2 The Rules on Public Interest Activities, Excerpts
- Appendix 5.3 Questionnaire: ‘Mandatory Rules on Public Interest Activities’
- 6 Improving Access to Justice in Malaysia: Introspection, Purpose, and Dynamism
- 7 Political Lawyers and the Legal Occupation in Myanmar
- 8 Alternative Lawyering versus Pro Bono in the Philippines: From Challenging an Authoritarian Government to Working with the State
- 9 Access to Justice in Singapore: A Government and Lawyer Dynamic
- 10 Public Interest Lawyering in South Korea: Standing on the Shoulders of Giants
- 11 A Hub, a Knot, and a Powerhouse: The Legal Aid Foundation and Access to Justice in Taiwan
- 12 Lawyers and Democratic Centralism in Vietnam
- Part II Comparative Perspectives on Access to Justice
- Index
Appendix 5.3 - Questionnaire: ‘Mandatory Rules on Public Interest Activities’
from 5 - Access to Justice and Lawyer Independence in Japan
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 29 September 2022
Edited by
Book contents
- The Role of Lawyers in Access to Justice
- The Role of Lawyers in Access to Justice
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Epigraph
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Appendices
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- 1 Understanding and Comparing Access to Justice
- Part I Access to Justice in Asia
- 2 Pro Bono, Legal Aid, and the Struggle for Justice in China
- 3 Access to Justice in India: Managing Multiple Mechanisms in a Restrictive Practice Environment
- 4 Access to Justice in Indonesia: Searching for Meaning
- 5 Access to Justice and Lawyer Independence in Japan
- I. Introduction
- II. Historical Background of the Commitment to Public Interest Activities
- III. Individual and Organized Forms of Public Interest Activities and Their Mutual Relationships
- IV. Mandatory Rules on Public Interest Activities
- V. Conclusion
- Appendix 5.1 The Rule on Association Affairs and Other Matters
- Appendix 5.2 The Rules on Public Interest Activities, Excerpts
- Appendix 5.3 Questionnaire: ‘Mandatory Rules on Public Interest Activities’
- 6 Improving Access to Justice in Malaysia: Introspection, Purpose, and Dynamism
- 7 Political Lawyers and the Legal Occupation in Myanmar
- 8 Alternative Lawyering versus Pro Bono in the Philippines: From Challenging an Authoritarian Government to Working with the State
- 9 Access to Justice in Singapore: A Government and Lawyer Dynamic
- 10 Public Interest Lawyering in South Korea: Standing on the Shoulders of Giants
- 11 A Hub, a Knot, and a Powerhouse: The Legal Aid Foundation and Access to Justice in Taiwan
- 12 Lawyers and Democratic Centralism in Vietnam
- Part II Comparative Perspectives on Access to Justice
- Index
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Role of Lawyers in Access to JusticeAsian and Comparative Perspectives, pp. 96 - 97Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022