Alvarez, M. (2016). Reasons for action: Justification, motivation, explanation. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2017 Edition). Zalta, Edward N. (ed.). Stanford University Press. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2017/entries/reasons-just-vs-expl/Google Scholar

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. (2017). Sterilization of women: Ethical issues and considerations. Committee Opinion No. 695. Obstet Gynecol, 129, e109–16.Google Scholar

Ananth, M. (2008). In defense of an evolutionary concept of health: Nature, norms, and human biology. Routledge.Google Scholar

Anderson, E. (1995). Value in ethics and economics. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Appiah, K. A. (1998). Race, culture, identity: Misunderstood connections. In Appiah, A., and Gutmann, A. (eds.). Color conscious: The political morality of race (pp. 30–105). Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Appiah, K. A. (2003). Thinking it through: An introduction to contemporary philosophy. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aronowitz, R. (2019). What is medicine for? Boston Review. https://bostonreview.net/science-nature/robert-aronowitz-what-medicineGoogle Scholar

Aronson, J. K., and Green, A. R. (2020). Me‐too pharmaceutical products: History, definitions, examples, and relevance to drug shortages and essential medicines lists. Br J Clin Pharmacol, 86, 2114–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Astin, J. A. (1998). Why patients use alternative medicine: Results of a national study. JAMA, 279(19), 1548–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ayer, A. J. (1946). Language, truth and logic. Gollancz.Google Scholar

Baker, M. (2016). Is there a reproducibility crisis? Nature, 533, 452–4.Google Scholar

Ban, T. A. (2022). The role of serendipity in drug discovery. Dialog Clin Neurosci, 8(3), 335–44.Google Scholar

Barnes, P. M., Bloom, B., and Nahin, R. L. (2007). Complementary and alternative medicine use among adults and children: United States, 2007. National Health Statistics Reports, no 12. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics.Google Scholar

Baumberger, C. (2019). Explicating objectual understanding: Taking degrees seriously. J Gen Philos Sci, 50(3), 367–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baumberger, C., Beisbart, C., and Brun, G. (2017). What is understanding? An overview of recent debates in epistemology and philosophy of science. In Grimm, S., Baumberger, C., and Ammon, S. (eds.). Explaining understanding: New perspectives from epistemology and philosophy of science (pp. 1–34). Routledge.Google Scholar

Bayne, T., and Levy, N. (2005). Amputees by choice: Body integrity identity disorder and the ethics of amputation. J Appl Philos, 22(1), 758–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Beauchamp, T. L., and Childress, J. F. (2001). Principles of biomedical ethics. 5th ed. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bechtel, W., and Abrahamsen, A. (2005). Explanation: A mechanist alternative. Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci, 36(2), 421–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bellavite, P., Conforti, A., Piasere, V., and Ortolani, R. (2005). Immunology and homeopathy. 1. Historical background. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med, 2(4), 441–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bengson, J. (2017). The unity of understanding. In Grimm, S. R. (ed.). Making sense of the world: New essays on the philosophy of understanding (pp. 14–53). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Ben-Moshe, N. (2019). The internal morality of medicine: A constructivist approach. Synthese, 196(11), 4449–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berglund, M., Westin, L., Svanström, R., and Sundler, A. J. (2012). Suffering caused by care – Patients’ experiences from hospital settings. Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being, 7, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Berofsky, B. (1995). Liberation from self: A theory of personal autonomy. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bird, A. (2007). What is scientific progress? Nous, 41(1), 64–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bird, A. (2019a). The aim of belief and the aim of science. Theoria, 34(2), 171–93.Google Scholar

Bird, A. (2019b). Systematicity, knowledge, and bias. How systematicity made clinical medicine a science. Synthese, 196(3), 863–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bivins, R. E. (2010). Alternative medicine? A history. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Blumer, R., and Meyer, M. (2006). The new medicine: Companion book to the public television series. Middlemarch Films.Google Scholar

Boetto, E., Golinelli, D., Carullo, G., and Fantini, M. P. (2021). Frauds in scientific research and how to possibly overcome them. J Med Ethics, 47(12), e19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boorse, C. (1975). On the distinction between disease and illness. Philos Public Aff, 5, 49–68.Google Scholar

Boorse, C. (1977). Health as a theoretical concept. Philos Sci, 44, 542–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boorse, C. (1997). A rebuttal on health. In Humber, J. M., and Almeder, R. F. (eds.). What is disease? (pp. 1–134). Humana Press.Google Scholar

Boorse, C. (2014). A second rebuttal on health. J Med Philos, 39(6), 683–724.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Boorse, C. (2016). Goals of medicine. In Giroux, É. (ed.). Naturalism in the philosophy of health. History, philosophy and theory of the life sciences (pp. 145–77). Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar

Brandom, R. (1994). Making it explicit. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Brandt, A. M., and Gardner, M. (2020). The golden age of medicine? In Cooter, A., and Pickstone, J. (eds.). Medicine in the twentieth century (pp. 21–37). Taylor & Francis.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Broadbent, A. (2011). Inferring causation in epidemiology: Mechanisms, black boxes, and contrasts. In McKay Illari, P., Russo, F., and Williamson, J. (eds.). Causality in the sciences (pp. 45–69). Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Broadbent, A. (2019). Philosophy of medicine. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brody, H., and Miller, F. G. (1998). The internal morality of medicine: Explication and application to managed care. J Med Philos, 23(4), 384–410.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Broom, D. H., and Woodward, R. V. (1996). Medicalisation reconsidered: Toward a collaborative approach to care. Sociol Health Illness, 18(3), 3573–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brülde, B. (2001). The goals of medicine. Towards a unified theory. Health Care Anal, 9(1), 1–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Burgess, A., and Plunkett, D. (2013). Conceptual ethics I. Philos Compass, 8(12), 1091–101.Google Scholar

Bynum, B. (2008). The McKeown thesis. Lancet, 371(9613), 644–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Callahan, D. (1996). The goals of medicine. Setting new priorities. Hastings Center Report, 26(6), S1–27.Google Scholar

Caplan, A. L. (1992). Does the philosophy of medicine exist? Theor Med, 13(1), 67–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Capozza, D. (2016). Dehumanization in medical contexts: An expanding research field. TPM Test Psychom Methodol Appl Psychol, 1, 545–59.Google Scholar

Cappelen, H. (2018). Fixing language: An essay on conceptual engineering. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carnap, R. (1950). Logical foundations of probability. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Carpenter, K. J. (2012). The discovery of vitamin C. Ann Nutr Metab, 61(3), 2592–64.Google ScholarPubMed

Carter, J. A., and Gordon, E. C. (2014). Objectual understanding and the value problem. Am Philos Quart, 51(1), 1–13.Google Scholar

Cartwright, N. (1999). The dappled world: A study of the boundaries of science. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cassell, E. J. (2004). The nature of suffering and the goals of medicine. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cavell, S. (1969). Knowing and acknowledging. In Must we mean what we say? (Ch. IX, pp. 238–66). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2020). Disability and Health Information for People with Disabilities. www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/disabilityandhealth/people.htmlGoogle Scholar

Chalmers, D. J. (2011). Verbal disputes. Philos Rev, 120(4), 515–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chalmers, D. J. (2015). Why isn’t there more progress in philosophy? Philosophy, 90(1), 3–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chalmers, D. J. (2020). What is conceptual engineering and what should it be? Inquiry, DOI: 10.1080/0020174X.2020.1817141CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chambers, C. (2008). Sex, culture, and justice: the limits of choice. Penn State University Press.Google Scholar

Cheng, Y., Lin, C. P., Liu, H. L., et al. (2007). Expertise modulates the perception of pain in others. Curr Biol, 17(19), 1708–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Christensen, D. (2010). Higher-order evidence. Philos Phenom Res, 81(1), 185–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Christman, J. (2009). The politics of persons: Individual autonomy and socio-historical selves. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jr Combs, G. F., and McClung, J. P. (2016). The vitamins: Fundamental aspects in nutrition and health. Academic Press.Google Scholar

Conrad, P. (2007). The medicalization of society: On the transformation of human conditions into treatable disorders. Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Conrad, P., Mackie, T., and Mehrotra, A. (2010). Estimating the costs of medicalization. Soc Sci Med, 70(12), 1943–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Coriddi, M., Nadeau, M., Taghizadeh, M., and Taylor, A. (2013). Analysis of satisfaction and well-being following breast reduction using a validated survey instrument: The BREAST-Q. Plast Reconstr Surg, 132(2), 285–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Coulehan, J. L., Platt, F. W., Egener, B., et al. (2001). Let me see if i have this right…”: Words that help build empathy. Ann Intern Med, 135(3), 221–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Craver, C. F. (2007). Explaining the brain: Mechanisms and the mosaic unity of neuroscience. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Craver, C. F., and Bechtel, W. (2007). Top-down causation without top-down causes. Biol Philos, 22(4), 547–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Craver, C. F., and Darden, L. (2013). In search of mechanisms: Discoveries across the life sciences. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Craver, C. F., and Tabery, J. (2019). Mechanisms in science. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2019 Edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2019/entries/science-mechanismsCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Craver, C. F., Glennan, S., and Povich, M. (2021). Constitutive relevance & mutual manipulability revisited. Synthese, 199(3), 8807–28.Google Scholar

Cunningham, T. V. (2015). Objectivity, scientificity, and the dualist epistemology of medicine. In Huneman, P., Lambert, G., and Silberstein, M. (eds.). Classification, disease and evidence (Vol. 7, pp. 1–17). Springer.Google Scholar

Cutler, D. M. (2004) Your money or your life. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Cutler, D. M., Rosen, A. B., and Vijan, S. (2006a). The value of medical spending in the United States, 1960–2000. N Engl J Med, 355(9), 920–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cutler, D., Deaton, A., and Lleras-Muney, A. (2006b). The determinants of mortality. JEP, 20(3), 97–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Daly, P. (2017). Philosophy of medicine 2017: Reviewing the situation. Theor Med Bioeth, 38(6), 483–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Danish Health and Medicines Authority. (2014), The seven roles of physicians. www.sst.dk/en/news/2013/~/media/39D3E216BCBF4A9096B286EE44F03691.ashxGoogle Scholar

Darrason, M. (2018). Mechanistic and topological explanations in medicine: The case of medical genetics and network medicine. Synthese, 195(1), 147–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davidson, D. (1963). Actions, reasons, and causes. In Davidson, D. (ed.) Essays on actions and events (pp. 3–20). Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Davis, K. (1991). Remaking the she‐devil: A critical look at feminist approaches to beauty. Hypatia, 6(2), 21–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dawson, J. (2021). Medically optimised: Healthcare language and dehumanisation. Br J Gen Pract, 71(706), 224.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Debes, R. (2018). Understanding persons and the problem of power. In Grimm, S. (ed.). Making sense of the world: New essays on the philosophy of understanding (pp. 547–7). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

De Block, A., and Hens, K. (2021). A plea for an experimental philosophy of medicine. Theor Med Bioeth, 42(3), 81–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dellsén, F. (2016). Scientific progress: Knowledge versus understanding. Stud Hist Philos Sci Part A, 56, 72–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dennett, D. (1986). Philosophy as mathematics or as anthropology. Mind Language 1(1), 18–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

De Regt, H. W. (2009). The epistemic value of understanding. Philos Sci, 76(5), 585–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

De Regt, H. W. (2017). Understanding scientific understanding. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

De Regt, H. W., and Dieks, D. (2005). A contextual approach to scientific understanding. Synthese, 144(1), 137–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

De Regt, H. W., Leonelli, S., and Eigner, K. (2009). Focusing on scientific understanding. In De Regt, H. W., Leonelli, S., and Eigner, K. (eds.). Scientific understanding: Philosophical perspectives (pp. 11–17). University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar

De Vreese, L. (2008). Causal (mis) understanding and the search for scientific explanations: a case study from the history of medicine. Stud Hist Philos Sci Part C, 39(1), 14–24.Google ScholarPubMed

Dewalt, D. A., and Pincus, T. (2003). The legacies of Rudolf Virchow: Cellular medicine in the 20th century and social medicine in the 21st century. Isr Med Assoc J, 5(6), 395–7.Google Scholar

Di Bernardo, G. A., Visintin, E. P., Dazzi, C., and Capozza, D. (2011). Patients’ dehumanization in health contexts. Poster presented at the 12th Annual Meeting of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, San Antonio, TX.Google Scholar

Douglas, H. (2003). The moral responsibilities of scientists (tensions between autonomy and responsibility). Am Philos Quart, 40(1), 59–68.Google Scholar

Douglas, H. (2009). Science, policy, and the value-free ideal. University of Pittsburgh Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Drake, J. M., Brett, T. S., Chen, S., et al. (2019). The statistics of epidemic transitions. PLoS Comput Biol, 15(5), e1006917.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dummett, M. (2010). The nature and future of philosophy. Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Dupré, J. (1993). The disorder of things: Metaphysical foundations of the disunity of science. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Dupré, J. (2004). The miracle of monism. In de Caro, M., and MacArthur, D. (eds.). Naturalism in question (pp. 21–39). Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Dupré, J. (2016). Toward a political philosophy of science. In Couch, M., and Pfeifer, J. (eds.). The philosophy of Philip Kitcher (pp. 182–205). Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eklund, M. (2014). Replacing truth. In Burgess, A., and Sherman, B. (eds.). Metasemantics: New essays on the foundations of meaning (pp. 293–310). Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eklund, M. (2015). Intuitions, conceptual engineering, and conceptual fixed points. In Daly, C. (ed.). The Palgrave handbook of philosophical methods (pp. 363–85). Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Elgin, C. (2007). Understanding and the facts. Philos Stud, 132(1), 33–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Elgin, C. (2009a). Is understanding factive? In Haddock, A., Millar, A., and Pritchard, D. (eds.). Epistemic value (pp. 322–30). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Elgin, C. (2009b). Exemplification, idealization, and understanding. In Suárez, M. (ed.). Fictions in science: Essays on idealization and modelling (pp. 77–90). Routledge.Google Scholar

Elgin, C. Z. (2017). True enough. MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jr Engelhardt, H. T., and Jotterand, F. (eds.). (2008). The philosophy of medicine reborn: A Pellegrino reader. University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar

Ereshefsky, M. (2009). Defining “health” and “disease.” Stud Hist Philos Sci Part C, 40(3), 221–7.Google ScholarPubMed

Ernst, E., and Singh, S. (2008). Trick or treatment: The undeniable facts about alternative medicine. W. W. Norton.Google Scholar

Ezell, J. M. (2022). The medicalization of freedom: How anti-science movements use the language of personal liberty and how we can address it. Nat Med, 28(2), 219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fanelli, D. (2018). Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis? Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 115(11), 2628–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Farmer, P., Basilico, M., and Messac, L. (2016). After McKeown. In Greene, J., Condrau, F., and Watkins, E. S. (eds.). Therapeutic revolutions (pp. 186–217). University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Flory, J. H., and Kitcher, P. (2004). Global health and the scientific research agenda. Philos Public Aff, 32(1), 36–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Fuchs, V. R. (2010 ). New priorities for future biomedical innovations. N Engl J Med, 363(8), 704–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gadamer, H. G. (1996). The enigma of health (trans: Gaiger, J., and Walker, N.). Polity.Google Scholar

Gallagher, S. (2005). How the body shapes the mind. Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Galvani, A. P., Parpia, A. S., Pandey, A., et al. (2022). Universal healthcare as pandemic preparedness: The lives and costs that could have been saved during the COVID-19 pandemic. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 119(25), e2200536119.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gijsbers, V. (2013). Understanding, explanation, and unification. Stud Hist Philos Sci Part A, 44(3), 516–22.Google Scholar

Gillett, C. (2020). Why constitutive mechanistic explanation cannot be causal: Highlighting needed theoretical projects and their constraints. Am Philos Quart, 57(1), 31–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Glennan, S. (2017). The new mechanical philosophy. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Glennan, S., Illari, P., and Weber, E. (2022). Six theses on mechanisms and mechanistic science. J Gen Philos Sci, 53(2), 143–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldman, A. (2006). Simulating minds: The philosophy, psychology, and neuroscience of mindreading. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goodman, S., and Greenland, S. (2007). Why most published research findings are false: Problems in the analysis. PLoS Med, 4(4), e168.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gopnik, A. (1998). Explanation as orgasm. Minds Mach, 8, 101–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gopnik, A. (2000). Explanation as orgasm and the drive for causal knowledge: The function, evolution, and phenomenology of the theory formation system. In Keil, F. C., and Wilson, R. A. (eds.). Explanation and cognition (pp. 299–323). MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grimm, S. R. (2006). Is understanding a species of knowledge? Br J Philos Sci, 57(3).Google Scholar

Grimm, S. (2011). Understanding. In Bernecker, S., and Pritchard, D. (eds.). The Routledge companion to epistemology (pp. 84–94). Routledge.Google Scholar

Grimm, S. (2012). The value of understanding. Philos Compass, 7(2), 103–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grimm, S. (2014). Understanding as knowledge of causes. In Fairweather, A. (ed.). Virtue epistemology naturalized: Bridges between virtue epistemology and philosophy of science (pp. 329–45). Springer.Google Scholar

Grimm, S. (2016). How understanding people differs from understanding the natural world. Philos Issues, 26(1), 209–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grimm, S. (2017). Understanding and transparency. In Grimm, S., Bamberger, C., and Ammon, S. (eds.). Explaining understanding: New perspectives from epistemology and philosophy of science (pp. 212–29). Routledge.Google Scholar

Grimm, S. (2021). Understanding. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2021 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2021/entries/understanding/Google Scholar

Halpern, J. (2014). From idealized clinical empathy to empathic communication in medical care. Med Health Care Philos 17, 301–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hannon, M. (2019). What’s the point of knowledge?: A function-first epistemology. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hannon, M. (2021). Recent work in the epistemology of understanding. Am Philos Quart, 58(3), 269–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hansson, S. O. (2017). Science and pseudo-science. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2017 Edition). Edward N. Zalta (ed.). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2017/entries/pseudo-science/Google Scholar

Haque, O. S., and Waytz, A. (2012). Dehumanization in medicine: Causes, solutions, and functions. Perspect Psychol Sci, 7(2), 176–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haslam, N., Loughnan, S., Reynolds, C., and Wilson, S. (2007). Dehumanization: A new perspective. Soc Personal Psychol Compass, 1(1), 409–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haslanger, S. (2000). Gender and race: (What) are they? (What) do we want them to be? Noûs, 34(1), 31–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haslanger, S. (2018). What is a social practice? R Inst Philos Suppl, 82, 231–47.Google Scholar

Hausman, D. (2017). Health and well-being. In Solomon, M., Simon, J., and Kincaid, H. (eds.). The Routledge companion to philosophy of medicine (pp. 273–5). Routledge.Google Scholar

Hawking, S., and Mlodinow, L. (2010). The grand design. Bantam Dell Publishing Group.Google Scholar

Heal, J. (2003). Mind, reason and imagination. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hempel, C. G. (1966). Philosophy of natural science. Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Hempel, C. G., and Oppenheim, P. (1948). Studies in the logic of explanation. Philos Sci, 15(2), 135–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Henderson, D. K., and Horgan, T. (2011). The epistemological spectrum: At the interface of cognitive science and conceptual analysis. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hershenov, D. B. (2020). Pathocentric health care and a minimal internal morality of medicine. J Med Philos, 45(1), 16–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hills, A. (2016). Understanding why. Noûs, 50(4), 661–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hofmann, B. (2016). Disease, illness, and sickness. In Solomon, M., Simon, J., and Kincaid, H. (eds.). The Routledge companion to philosophy of medicine (pp. 30–40). Routledge.Google Scholar

Hojat, M., Louis, D. Z., Markham, F. W., Wender, R., Rabinowitz, C., and Gonnella, J. S. (2011). Physicians’ empathy and clinical outcomes for diabetic patients. Acad Med, 86, 359–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Honneth, A. (2008). Reification: A new look at an old idea. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Horton, R. (2015). Offline: What is medicine’s 5 sigma. Lancet, 385(9976), 1380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Howick, J. (2011). Exposing the vanities – and a qualified defence – of mechanistic evidence in clinical decision-making. Philos Sci, 78, 926–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Howick, J., Mittoo, S., Abel, L., Halpern, J., and Mercer, S. W. (2020). A price tag on clinical empathy? Factors influencing its cost-effectiveness. J R Soc Med, 113(10), 389–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hoyningen-Huene, P. (2013). Systematicity: The nature of science. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hoyningen-Huene, P. (2019). Replies. Synthese, 196(3), 907–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Huber, M., Knottnerus, J. A., Green, L., et al. (2011). How should we define health? BMJ, 343.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Huneman, P., Lambert, G., and Silberstein, M. (2015). Introduction: Surveying the revival in the philosophy of medicine. In Huneman, P., Lambert, G., and Silberstein, M. (eds.). Classification, disease and evidence: New essays in the philosophy of medicine (pp. vii–xix). Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Illari, P. M. (2011). Disambiguating the Russo-Williamson thesis. Int Stud Philos Sci, 25, 139–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Illari, P. M., and Williamson, J. (2012). What is a mechanism? Thinking about mechanisms across the sciences. Eur J Philos Sci, 2(1), 119–35.Google Scholar

Illich, I. (1974). Medical nemesis. Lancet, 303(7863), 918–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ioannidis, J. P. (2005). Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Med, 2(8), e124.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ioannidis, J. P. (2016). Why most clinical research is not useful. PLoS Med, 13(6), e1002049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jaeggi, R. (2018). On the critique of forms of life. Belknap Press.Google Scholar

Jamshidi, S., Parker, J. S., and Hashemi, S. (2020). The effects of environmental factors on the patient outcomes in hospital environments: A review of literature. Front Archit Res. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2019.10.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johnson, M. (2015). Embodied understanding. Front Psychol, 6, 875.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kaiser, M. I. (2019). Normativity in the philosophy of science. Metaphilosophy, 50(1–2), 36–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaplan, D. M., and Craver, C. F. (2011). The explanatory force of dynamical and mathematical models in neuroscience: A mechanistic perspective. Philos Sci, 78(4), 601–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaplan, R. M., and Milstein, A. (2019). Contributions of health care to longevity: A review of 4 estimation methods. Ann Fam Med, 17(3), 267–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kauppinen, A. (2002). Reason, recognition, and internal critique. Inquiry, 45(4), 479–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kauppinen, A. (2007). The rise and fall of experimental philosophy. Philos Explor, 10(2), 95–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kelly, T. (2016). Evidence. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Edward N. Zalta (ed.). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/evidence/Google Scholar

Kelp, C. (2021). Inquiry, knowledge and understanding. Synthese, 198(7), 1583–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kendler, K. S., and Campbell, J. (2009). Interventionist causal models in psychiatry: Repositioning the mind–body problem. Psychol Med, 39(6), 881–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kendler, K. S., and Neale, M. C. (2010). Endophenotype: A conceptual analysis. Mol Psychiatry, 15(8), 789–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kernahan, P. J. (2012) Was there ever a ‘golden age’ of medicine?. Minn Med, 95(9), 41–5.Google ScholarPubMed

Kersey, R. D., Elliot, D. L., Goldberg, L., et al. (2012). National Athletic Trainers’ Association position statement: Anabolic-androgenic steroids. J Athl Train, 47(5), 567–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Khalifa, K. (2013). The role of explanation in understanding. Br J Philos Sci, 64(1), 161–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Khalifa, K. (2017). Understanding, explanation, and scientific knowledge. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Khalifa, K. (2019). Is verstehen scientific understanding? Philos Soc Sci, 49(4), 282–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kingma, E. M. (2012). Health and health promotion. Technische Universiteit Eindhoven. https://pure.tue.nl/ws/files/3462442/kingma2012.pdfGoogle Scholar

Kingma, E. (2019). Contemporary accounts of health. In Kingma, E. (ed.). Health (pp. 289–318). Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kinzer, S. (2019). Poisoner in chief: Sidney Gottlieb and the CIA search for mind control. Henry Holt and Company.Google Scholar

Kirmayer, L. J. (2011). Multicultural medicine and the politics of recognition. J Med Philos, 36(4), 410–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kirsch, I. (2019). Placebo effect in the treatment of depression and anxiety. Front Psychiatry, 10, 407.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kitcher, P. (2001). Science, truth, and democracy. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kitcher, P. (2008). Carnap and the caterpillar. Philos Top, 36(1), 111–27.Google Scholar

Kitcher, P. (2011). Science in a democratic society. Prometheus Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kitcher, P. (2015). Pragmatism and progress. Trans Charles S. Peirce Soc, 51(4), 475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kitcher, P. (2016). Reply to Dupré. In Couch, M. (ed.). The philosophy of Philip Kitcher (pp. 182–205). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kornblith, H. (1993). Epistemic normativity. Synthese, 94(3), 357–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kornblith, H. (2002). Knowledge and its place in nature. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kornblith, H. (2017). A naturalistic methodology. In D’Oro, G., and Overgaard, S. (eds.). The Cambridge companion to philosophical methodology (1st ed., pp. 141–60). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kraut, R. (2009). What is good and why: The ethics of well-being. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Kripke, S. (1980). Naming and necessity. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Kuhn, T. S. (1974). Logic of discovery or psychology of research? In Schilpp, P. A. (ed.). The Philosophy of Karl Popper, The Library of Living Philosophers (Vol. xiv, book ii, pp. 798–819). Open Court.Google Scholar

Kuhn, T. S. (1977). The essential tension. Selected studies in scientific tradition and change. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kukla, R. (2005). Conscientious autonomy: Displacing decisions in health care. Hastings Center Report, 35(2), 344–4.Google ScholarPubMed

Kvanvig, J. L. (2003). The value of knowledge and the pursuit of understanding. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kvanvig, J. (2009). The value of understanding. In Haddock, A., Millar, A., and Pritchard, D. (eds.). Epistemic value (pp. 95–111). Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kvanvig, J. (2013). Curiosity and the response-dependent special value of understanding. In Henning, T., and Schweikard, D. P. (eds.). Knowledge, virtue and action: Putting epistemic virtues to work (pp. 151–74). Routledge.Google Scholar

Kyle, R. A., Steensma, D. P., and Shampo, M. A. (2016). Barry James Marshall – Discovery of Helicobacter pylori as a cause of peptic ulcer. Mayo Clin Proc, 91(5), e67–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lakatos, I. (1981). Science and pseudoscience. In Brown, S., Fauvel, J., and Finnegan, R. (eds.). Conceptions of inquiry: A reader (pp. 114–21). Methuen.Google Scholar

Laplane, L., Mantovani, P., Adolphs, R., et al. (2019). Opinion: Why science needs philosophy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 116(10), 3948–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Laudan, L. (1983). The demise of the demarcation problem. In Cohen, R. S., and Laudan, L. (eds.). Physics, philosophy and psychoanalysis (pp. 111–27). Springer.Google Scholar

Laudan, L. (1984). Science and values. University of California Press.Google Scholar

Le Fanu, J. (2012). The rise and fall of modern medicine. Basic Books.Google Scholar

Lemoine, M. (2015). The naturalization of the concept of disease. In Hunemann, P., Lambert, G., and Silberstein, M. (eds.). Classification, disease and evidence (pp. 19–41). Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lemoine, M., Darrason, M., and Richard, H. (2014). Where is philosophy of medicine headed? A report of the International Advanced Seminar in the Philosophy of Medicine (IASPM). J Eval Clin Pract, 20(6), 991–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lewis, D. (1986). Causal explanation. In Lewis, D. (ed.). Philosophical papers (Vol. II, pp. 214–40). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Lichstein, P. R. (1990). The medical interview. In Walker, H. K., Hall, W. D., and Hurst, J. W. (eds.). Clinical methods: The history, physical, and laboratory examinations (3rd ed., Ch. 3, pp. 29–36). Butterworths.Google Scholar

Lind, J. (1772). A treatise on the scurvy: In three parts. Containing an inquiry into the nature, causes, and cure, of that disease. Together with a critical and chronological view of what has been published on the subject. 3rd ed. S. Crowder.Google Scholar

Lipton, P. (2001). What good is an explanation? In Hon, G., and Rakover, S. S. (eds.). Explanation: Theoretical approaches and applications (pp. 53–9). Springer Science and Business Media.Google Scholar

Lipton, P. (2004). Inference to the best explanation. Routledge.Google Scholar

Lipton, P. (2009). Understanding without explanation. In de Regt, H. W., Leonelli, S., and Eigner, K. (eds.). Scientific understanding: Philosophical perspectives (pp. 43–63). University of Pittsburgh Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Loeb, S., Bjurlin, M. A., Nicholson, J., et al. (2014). Overdiagnosis and overtreatment of prostate cancer. Eur Urol, 65(6), 1046–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Loomis, E., and Juhl, C. (2006). Explication. In Sarkar, S., and Pfeifer, J. (eds.).The philosophy of science: An introduction (pp. 287–94). Routledge.Google Scholar

Lyerly, A. D. (2012). Ethics and “normal birth.” Birth, 39(4), 315–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lyre, H. (2018). Medizin als Wissenschaft – eine wissenschaftstheoretische Analyse. In Ringkamp, D., and Wittwer, H. (eds.). Was ist Medizin? Der Begriff der Medizin und seine ethischenImplikationen (pp. 143–66). Alber.Google Scholar

Machamer, P., Darden, L., and Craver, C. F. (2000). Thinking about mechanisms. Philos Sci, 67(1), 12–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

MacIntyre, A. (2007). After virtue: A study in moral theory [1981]. Duckworth.Google Scholar

Makary, M. A., and Daniel, M. (2016). Medical error – the third leading cause of death in the US. Bmj, 353.Google ScholarPubMed

Malacrida, C., and Boulton, T. (2014). The best laid plans? Women’s choices, expectations and experiences in childbirth. Health, 18(1), 41–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Marcum, J. A. (2008). Humanizing modern medicine: An introductory philosophy of medicine. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marcum, J. A. (2012). Medicine’s crises. In Marcum, J. A. (ed.). The virtuous physician (Vol. 114, pp. 1–28). Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marcum, J. A. (2016) Bloomsbury companion to contemporary philosophy of medicine. Bloomsbury.Google Scholar

Mardis, E. R., and Wilson, R. K. (2009). Cancer genome sequencing: A review. Hum Mol Genet, 18(R2), R163–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

McAndrew, S. (2019). Internal morality of medicine and physician autonomy. J Med Ethics, 45(3), 198–203.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

McCrory, C., and McNally, S. (2013). The effect of pregnancy intention on maternal prenatal behaviours and parent and child health: Results of an Irish cohort study. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol, 27(2), 208–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

McGinn, C. (2015). The science of philosophy. Metaphilosophy, 46(1), 84–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McKenna, M. (2020). The antibiotic paradox: Why companies can’t afford to create life-saving drugs. Nature, 584(7821), 338–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

McKeown, T. (1976). The modern rise of population. Academic Press.Google Scholar

McMullin, E. (1983). Values in science. In Asquith, P. D., and Nickles, T. (eds.). Proceedings of the 1982 Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association (Vol. 1, pp. 32–8). Philosophy of Science Association.Google Scholar

Messerli, F. H. (2012). Chocolate consumption, cognitive function, and Nobel laureates. N Engl J Med, 376, 1562–4.Google Scholar

Miller, C. (2014). Medicine is not science: Guessing the future, predicting the past: Towards a theory of irregularity. J Eval Clin Pract, 20(6), 865–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Miller, F. G., and Brody, H. (2001). The internal morality of medicine: An evolutionary perspective. J Med Philos, 26(6), 581–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Miller, C., and Miller, D. (2014). Medicine is not science. EJPCH, 2(2), 144–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Miller, F. G., Brody, H., and Chung, K. C. (2000). Cosmetic surgery and the internal morality of medicine. Camb Q Healthc Ethics, 9, 353.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Mintzes, B. (2006). Disease mongering in drug promotion: Do governments have a regulatory role? PLoS Med, 3(4), e198.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Morganti, M. (2016). Naturalism and realism in the philosophy science. In Clark, K. J. (ed.). The Blackwell companion to naturalism (pp. 75–90). John Wiley & Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moynihan, R., and Cassels, A. (2005). Selling sickness: How drug companies are turning us all into patients. Crowsnest.Google Scholar

Mukerji, N., and Ernst, E. (2022). Why homoeopathy is pseudoscience. Synthese, 200(5), 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Munson, R. (1981). Why medicine cannot be a science. J Med Philos, 6(2), 183–208.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Murphy, D. (2005). Can evolution explain insanity? Biol Philos, 20(4), 745–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nagel, E. (1961). The structure of science: Problems in the logic of scientific explanation. Harcourt, Brace, and World, Inc.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nervi, M. (2010). Mechanisms, malfunctions and explanation in medicine. Biol Philos, 25, 215–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Neumann, M., Bensing, J., Mercer, S., Ernstmann, N., Ommen, O., and Pfaff, H. (2009). Analyzing the “nature” and “specific effectiveness” of clinical empathy: A theoretical overview and contribution towards a theory-based research agenda. Patient Educ Couns, 74, 339–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Newman, M. (2012). An inferential model of scientific understanding. Int Stud Philos Sci, 26(1), 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ng, C. C. W., and Saad, T. C. (2021). Re-examining the idea of internal morality in medicine. New Bioeth, 27(3), 230–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Nichols, S. (2002). How psychopaths threaten moral rationalism: Is it irrational to be amoral? Monist, 85(2), 285–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nissen, S. E. (2010). The rise and fall of rosiglitazone. Eur Heart J, 31(7), 773–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Nordenfelt, L. (1987). On the nature of health: An action-theoretic approach (Vol. 26). Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nordenfelt, L. (1998). On medicine and health enhancement – towards a conceptual framework. Med Health Care Philos, 1(1), 51–2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Nordenfelt, L. (2007). The concepts of health and illness revisited. Med Health Care Philos, 10(1), 5–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Nordenfelt, L. (2017). On concepts of positive health. In Schramme, T., and Edwards, S. (eds.). Handbook of the philosophy of medicine (pp. 29–43). Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

O’Mahony, S. (2019a). After the golden age: What is medicine for? Lancet, 393(10183), 1798–9.Google ScholarPubMed

O’Mahony, S. (2019b). Can medicine be cured?: The corruption of a profession. Head of Zeus Ltd.Google Scholar

Oreskes, N. (2019). Systematicity is necessary but not sufficient: On the problem of facsimile science. Synthese, 196(3), 881–905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Parens, E. (2013). On good and bad forms of medicalization. Bioethics, 27(1), 28–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Pellegrino, E. D. (1976). Philosophy of medicine: Problematic and potential. J Med Philos, 1(1), 53–1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Pellegrino, E. D. (1986). Philosophy of medicine: Towards a definition. J Med Philos, 11(1), 9–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Pellegrino, E. D. (1998). What the philosophy of medicine is. Theor Med Bioeth, 19(4), 315–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Pellegrino, E. D. (2001). The internal morality of clinical medicine: A paradigm for the ethics of the helping and healing professions. J Med Philos, 26(6), 559–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Pellegrino, E. D., and Thomasma, D. C. (1981). A philosophical basis of medical practice. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Pellegrino, E. D., and Thomasma, D. C. (1993). The virtues in medical practice. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pennock, R. T. (2019). An instinct for truth: Curiosity and the moral character of science. MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pigliucci, M. (2015). Scientism and pseudoscience: A philosophical commentary. J Bioeth Inq, 12, 569–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Pigliucci, M., and Boudry, M. (2013). Introduction: Why the demarcation problem matters. In Pigliucci, M., and Boudry, M. (eds.). Philosophy of pseudoscience: Reconsidering the demarcation problem (pp. 1–16). The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Popper, K. (1962). Conjectures and refutations. The growth of scientific knowledge. Basic Books.Google Scholar

Popper, K. R. (1979). Objective knowledge: An evolutionary approach. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Popper, K. R. (2000). Realism and the aim of science: From the postscript to the logic of scientific discovery. Routledge.Google Scholar

Porter, R. (1997/1999). The greatest benefit to mankind: A medical history of mankind. WW Norton and Company.Google Scholar

Porter, R. (2002). Blood and guts: A short history of medicine. W. W. Norton.Google Scholar

Potochnik, A. (2015). The diverse aims of science. Stud Hist Philos Sci Part A, 53, 71–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Potochnik, A. (2017). Idealization and the aims of science. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Prinz, J. (2007). The emotional construction of morals. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Pritchard, D. (2010). Knowledge and understanding. In The nature and value of knowledge: Three investigations, Part I. Co-authored with Millar, A., and Haddock, A. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pritchard, D. (2016). Seeing it for oneself: Perceptual knowledge, understanding, and intellectual autonomy. Episteme, 13(1), 29–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Radiological Society of North America (2008) Patient photos spur radiologist empathy and eye for detail. ScienceDaily, 14 Dec. www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/12/081202080809.htmGoogle Scholar

Raffaeli, W., and Arnaudo, E. (2017). Pain as a disease: An overview. J Pain Res, 10, 2003–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rakel, D., Barrett, B., Zhang, Z., et al. (2011). Perception of empathy in the therapeutic encounter: Effects on the common cold. Patient Educ Couns, 85, 390–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ramsey, W. (1992). Prototypes and conceptual analysis. Topoi, 11(1), 59–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Redberg, R. F., and Katz, M. H. (2016). Statins for primary prevention: The debate is intense, but the data are weak. JAMA, 316(19), 1979–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Reisch, G. A. (1998). Pluralism, logical empiricism, and the problem of pseudoscience. Philos Sci, 65(2), 333–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reiser, D. E., and Schroder, A. K. (1980). Patient interviewing – The human dimension. Williams and Wilkins.Google Scholar

Reiss, J., and Kitcher, P. (2009). Biomedical research, neglected diseases, and well-ordered science. Theoria, 24(3), 263–82.Google Scholar

Riggs, W. D. (2003). Understanding “virtue” and the virtue of understanding. In DePaul, M. R., and Zagzebski, L. T. (eds.). Intellectual virtue: Perspectives from ethics and epistemology (pp. 203–26). Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Risjord, M. (2014). Philosophy of social science: A contemporary introduction. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rosenberg, A. (2005). Philosophy of science: A contemporary introduction. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rowbottom, D. P. (2014). Aimless science. Synthese, 191(6), 1211–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ruse, M. (2009). Monad to man: The concept of progress in evolutionary biology. Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Russo, F., and Williamson, J. (2007). Interpreting causality in the health sciences. Int Stud Philos Sci, 21(2), 157–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ryan, J., Khanda, G. E., Hibbert, R., et al. (2015). Is a picture worth a thousand words? The effect of viewing patient photographs on radiologist interpretation of CT studies. J Am Coll Radiol, 12(1), 104–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sadegh-Zadeh, K. (2012). Handbook of analytic philosophy of medicine (Vol. 113). Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Salmon, W. C. (1984). Scientific explanation and the causal structure of the world. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Sandman, L., and Hansson, E. (2020). An ethics analysis of the rationale for publicly funded plastic surgery. BMC Medical Ethics, 21(1), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Scharp, K. (2013). Replacing truth. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schramme, T. (2017a). Goals of medicine. In Schramme, T., and Edwards, S. (eds.). Handbook of the philosophy of medicine (pp. 121–8). Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schramme, T. (2017b). Philosophy of medicine and bioethics. In Schramme, T., and Edwards, S. (eds.). Handbook of the philosophy of medicine (pp. 3–15). Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schramme, T., and Edwards, S. (eds.). (2017). Handbook of the philosophy of medicine. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schroeder, S. A. (2013). Rethinking health: Healthy or healthier than? Br J Philos Sci, 64(1), 131–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schroeder, S. A. (2016). Health, disability, and well-being. In Fletcher, G. (ed.). Routledge handbook of philosophy of well-being (pp. 221–32). Routledge.Google Scholar

Schroer, J. W., and Schroer, R. (2013). Two potential problems with philosophical intuitions: Muddled intuitions and biased intuitions. Philosophia, 41(4), 1263–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schupbach, J. N. (2015). Experimental explication. Philos Phenomenol Res, 91(2), 672–710.Google Scholar

Scott, S. (2006). The medicalisation of shyness: From social misfits to social fitness. Sociol Health Illn, 28(2), 133–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Shojania, K. G., and Dixon-Woods, M. (2017). Estimating deaths due to medical error: The ongoing controversy and why it matters. BMJ Qual Saf, 26(5), 423–8.Google ScholarPubMed

Sholl, J. (2017). The muddle of medicalization: Pathologizing or medicalizing?. Theor Med Bioeth, 38(4), 2652–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Sholl, J. (2021 ). Can aging research generate a theory of health? Hist Philos Life Sci, 43(2), 45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Sholl, J., and Rattan, S. I. (2020). How is “Health” explained across the sciences? Conclusions and recapitulation. In Sholl, J., and Rattan, S. I. (eds.). Explaining health across the sciences (pp. 541–9). Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, K. (2012). Against homeopathy – A utilitarian perspective. Bioethics, 26(8), 398–409.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Snow, H. A., and Fleming, B. R. (2014). Consent, capacity and the right to say no. Med J Aust, 201(8), 486–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Sober, E. (2008). Evidence and evolution: The logic behind the science. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Solomon, M. (2015). Making medical knowledge. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Solomon, M., Simon, J. R., and Kincaid, H. (eds.). (2017). The Routledge companion to philosophy of medicine. Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group.Google Scholar

Sosa, E. (2007) Experimental philosophy and philosophical intuition. Philos Stud, 132, 99–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Steel, D. (2008). Across the boundaries, extrapolation in biology and social science. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Stegenga, J. (2018). Medical nihilism. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Steinberger, F. (2016). The normative status of logic. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2017 Edition). Edward N. Zalta (ed.). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2017/entries/logic-normative/Google Scholar

Strevens, M. (2010). Varieties of understanding. In Pacific Division meeting of the American Philosophical Association, San Francisco, CA, March (Vol. 31).Google Scholar

Strevens, M. (2013). No understanding without explanation. Stud Hist Philos Sci Part A, 44(3), 510–15.Google Scholar

Strevens, M. (2017). How idealizations provide understanding. In Grimm, S. R. (ed.). Explaining understanding: New perspectives from epistemology and philosophy of science (pp. 37–49). Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group.Google Scholar

Stuart, M. (2017). How thought experiments increase understanding. In Stuart, M. T., Fehige, Y., and Brown, J. R. (eds.). The Routledge companion to thought experiments (pp. 526–44). Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stueber, K. R. (2012). Understanding versus explanation? How to think about the distinction between the human and the natural sciences. Inquiry, 55(1), 173–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stueber, K. R. (2017). Empathy and understanding reasons. In Maibom, H. (ed.). The Routledge handbook of philosophy of empathy (pp. 137–47). Routledge.Google Scholar

Suchman, A. L., Markakis, K., Beckman, H. B., and Frankel, R. (1997). A model of empathic communication in the medical interview. Jama, 277(8), 678–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Symons, X. (2019). Pellegrino, MacIntyre, and the internal morality of clinical medicine. Theor Med Bioeth, 40(3), 243–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Tallis, R. (2004). Hippocratic oaths: Medicine and its discontents. Atlantic Books.Google Scholar

Taylor, C. (1971). Interpretation and the sciences of man. Rev Metaphys, 25(1), 3–51.Google Scholar

Thagard, P. (2003). Pathways to biomedical discovery. Philos Sci, 70, 235–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thagard, P. (2005). What is a medical theory? Stud Multidiscip, 3, 47–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thomasson, A. (2015). What can philosophy really do? Philos Mag, (71), 17–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thomasson, A. L. (2017). Metaphysics and conceptual negotiation. Philos Iss, 27(1), 364–82.Google Scholar

Todres, L., Galvin, K. T., and Holloway, I. (2009). The humanization of healthcare: A value framework for qualitative research. Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being, 4(2), 68–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Topol, E. (2019). Deep medicine: How artificial intelligence can make healthcare human again. Hachette, UK.Google Scholar

Trevarthen, C. (1979). Communication and cooperation in early infancy: A description of primary intersubjectivity. In Bulowa, M. (ed.). Before speech: The beginning of human communication (pp. 321–47). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Tridandapani, S., Bhatti, P., and Wick, C. (2019). Patient photographs: Privacy versus protection. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 212(2), 320.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Trout, J. D. (2002). Scientific explanation and the sense of understanding. Philos Sci, 69(2), 212–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Turner, Y., and Hadas-Halpern, I. (2008). The effects of including a patient’s photograph to the radiographic examination. Radiological Society of North America 2008 Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar

Ukraintseva, S., Yashin, A. I., and Arbeev, K. G. (2016). Resilience versus robustness in aging. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci, 71(11), 1533–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Van den Berghe, P. L. (1967). Race and racism: A comparative perspective. John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar

Van Inwagen, P. (2008). How to think about the problem of free will. J Ethics, 12(3/4), 327–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Varelius, J. (2005). Health and autonomy. Med Health Care Philos, 8(2), 221–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Varga, S. (2015). Naturalism, interpretation, and mental disorder. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Varga, S. (2019). Scaffolded minds. MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Varga, S. (2020) Epistemic authority, philosophical explication, and the bio-statistical theory of disease. Erkenntnis, 85, 937–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Veatch, R. M. (2001). The impossibility of a morality internal to medicine. J Med Philos, 26(6), 621–42.Google ScholarPubMed

Veit, W. (2021). Experimental philosophy of medicine and the concepts of health and disease. Theor Med Bioeth, 42(3), 169–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Venkatapuram, S. (2013). Health, vital goals, and central human capabilities. Bioethics, 27(5), 271–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Walker, C. M., and Gopnik, A. (2013). Causality and imagination. In Taylor, M. (ed.).The Oxford handbook of the development of imagination (pp. 342–58). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Wartofsky, K., and Zaner, R. M. (1980). Editorial: Understanding and explanation in medicine. J Med Philos, 5, 23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Waskan, J. (2011). Mechanistic explanation at the limit. Synthese, 183(3), 389–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weatherall, D. (1996). Science and the quiet art: The role of medical research in health care. W. W. Norton.Google Scholar

Wilkenfeld, D. A. (2013). Understanding as representation manipulability. Synthese, 190(6), 997–1016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Williamson, T. (2004). Philosophical “intuitions” and scepticism about judgement. Dialectica, 58(1), 109–52.Google Scholar

Williamson, T. (2018). Doing philosophy: From common curiosity to logical reasoning. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Williamson, J. (2019). Establishing causal claims in medicine. Int Stud Philos Sci, 32(1), 33–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Woodward, J. (2003). Making things happen: A theory of causal explanation. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Woodward, J. (2004). Counterfactuals and causal explanation. Int Stud Philos Sci, 18(1), 41–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Woodward, J. (2010). Causation in biology: Stability, specificity, and the choice of levels of explanation. Biol Philos, 25(3), 287–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Woodward, J. (2015). Interventionism and causal exclusion. Philos Phenomenol Res, 91(2), 303–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wootton, D. (2006). Bad medicine: Doctors doing harm since Hippocrates. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Wright, G. H. (1963). Norm and action: A logical inquiry. Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Wright, H. G. (2007). Means, ends and medical care. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Yanikkerem, E., Ay, S., and Piro, N. (2013). Planned and unplanned pregnancy: Effects on health practice and depression during pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol Res, 39(1), 180–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ylikoski, P. (2013). Causal and constitutive explanation compared. Erkenntnis, 78, 277–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zola, I. K. (1972) Medicine as an institution of social control. Sociol Rev, 20, 487–504.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed