Akar, D., and Louhiala-Salminen, L. (1999). Towards a new genre: a comparative study of business faxes. In F. Bargiela-Chiappini and G. Nickerson (eds.), Writing business: genres, media and discourses. London: Longman

Allison, D. (2002). Approaching English language research. Singapore: Singapore University Press

Altman, H. (1980). Foreign language teaching: focus on the learner. In H. Altman and C. Vaughan James (eds.), Foreign language teaching: meeting individual needs. Oxford: Pergamon

Aston, G. (1997). Involving learners in developing learning methods: exploiting text corpora in self access. In P. Benson and P. Voller (eds.), Autonomy and independence in language learning (pp. 204– 14). London: Longman

Bachman, L. (1990). Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Bachman, L., and Palmer, A. (1996). Language testing in practice: designing and developing useful language tests. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Bailey, K. (1990). The use of diary studies in teacher education programs. In J. Richards and D. Nunan (eds.), Second language teacher education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Ballard, B., and Clanchy, J. (1991). Assessment by misconception: cultural influences and intellectual traditions. In L. Hamp-Lyons (ed.), Assessing second language writing in academic contexts (pp. 19–35). Norwood, NJ: Ablex

Bargiela-Chiappini, F., and Nickerson, G. (eds.). (1999). Writing business: genres, media and discourses. London: Longman

Barnett, M. (1989). More than meets the eye. Foreign language reading: theory and practice. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall

Barton, D., and Hamilton, M. (1998). Local literacies. London: Routledge

Bates, L., Lane, J., and Lange, E. (1993). Writing clearly: responding toESLcomposition. Boston: Heinle & Heinle

Bazerman, C., and Russell, D. (eds.). (1994). Landmark essays on writing across the curriculum. Davis, CA: Hermagoras Press

Belanoff, P., and Dickson, M. (eds.). (1991). Portfolios: process and product. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann

Bell, J. (1999). Doing your research project (3rd ed.). Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press

Bell, J., and Gower, R. (1998). Writing course materials for the world: a great compromise. In B. Tomlinson (ed.), Materials development in language teaching (pp. 116–29). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Benesch, S. (2001). Critical English for academic purposes. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum

Benesch, S., Rakijas, M., and Rorschach, B. (1987). Academic writing workshop. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth

Bereiter, C., and Scardamalia, M. (1987). The psychology of written composition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum

Berg, E. C. (1999). The effects of trained peer response on ESL students' revision types and writing quality. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8 (3), 215–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bernhardt, S., Edwards, P., and Wojahan, P. (1989). Teaching college composition with computers: a timed observation study. Written Communication, 7, 342–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berwick, R. (1989). Needs assessment in language programming: from theory to practice. In R. Johnson (ed.), The second language curriculum. New York: Cambridge University PressCrossRef

Bhatia, V. K. (1993). Analysing Genre: Language use in professional settings. London: Longman

Bhatia, V. K. (1997). The power and politics of genre. World Englishes, 17(3), 359–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bialystok, E. (1985). The compatibility of teaching and learning strategies. Applied Linguistics, 6, 255–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bizzell, P. (1992). Academic discourse and critical consciousness. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press

Blass, L., and Pike-Baky, M. (1985). Mosaic I: a content-based writing book. New York: Random House

Board of Studies. (1998a). K-6 English Syllabus: Sydney, NSW: Board of Studies

Board of Studies. (1998b). K-6 English Syllabus: Modules. Sydney, NSW: Board of Studies

Braine, G., and Yorozu, M. (1998). Local Area Network (LAN) computers in ESL and EFL writing classes: promises and realities. JALT Journal, 20(2), 47–59Google Scholar

Breen, M. (2001). Syllabus design. In R. Carter and D. Nunan (eds.), The Cambridge guide to teaching Engish to speakers of other languages (pp. 151–9). Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRef

Brown, J. D. (1995). The elements of language curriculum: a systematic approach to program development. Boston: Heinle & Heinle

Brown, J. D., and Hudson, T. (1998). The alternatives in language assessment. TESOL Quarterly, 32(4), 653–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, K., and Hood, S. (1989). Writing matters: writing skills and strategies for students of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Bruffee, K. (1986). Social construction: Language and the authority of knowledge. A bibliographical essay. College English, 48, 773–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bruner, J. S. (1986). Acts of meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

Burns, A. (1990). Genre-based approaches to writing and beginning adult ESL learners. Prospect, 5(3), 62–71Google Scholar

Burns, A. (1999). Collaborative action research for English language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Butt, D., Fahey, R., Feez, S., Spinks, S., and Yallop, C. (2000). Using functional grammar: an explorer's guide (2nd ed.). Sydney: NCELTR

Buttjes, D., and Byram, M. (eds.). (1991). Mediating languages and cultures: towards an intercultural theory of foreign language education. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters

Byrne, D. (1988). Teaching writing skills. Harlow, UK: Pearson Education

Canagarajah, S. (1999). Resisting linguistic imperialism in English teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Canale, M., and Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1(1–47)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carson, J., and Leki, I. (eds.). (1993). Reading in the composition classroom. Boston: Heinle & Heinle

Carson, J., and Nelson, G. (1996). Chinese students' perceptions of ESL peer response group interaction. Journal of Second Language Writing, 5(1), 1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chang, Y.-Y., and Swales, J. (1999). Informal elements in English academic writing: threats or opportunities for advanced non-native speakers? In C. N. Candlin and K. Hyland (eds.), Writing: texts, processes and practices (pp. 145–67). London: Longman

Clarke, D. (1989). Communicative theory and its influence on materials production. Language Teaching, 73–86CrossRef

Clyne, M. (1987). Cultural differences in the organisation of academic texts. Journal of Pragmatics, 11, 211–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coe, N., Rycroft, R., and Ernest, P. (1992). Writing: A problem solving approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Cohen, A. (1994). Assessing language ability in the classroom (2nd ed.). Boston: Heinle and Heinle

Cohen, M., Manion, L., and Morrison, K. (2000). Research methods in education (5th ed.). London: Routledge

Connor, U. (1996). Contrastive rhetoric. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Connor, U., and Asenavage, K. (1994). Peer response groups in ESL writing classes: how much impact on revision? Journal of Second Language Writing, 3, 257–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Connors, R., and Lunsford, A. (1993). Teachers' rhetorical comments on student papers. College Composition and Communication, 44, 200–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cook, G. (1989). Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Crookes, G., and Gass, S. (eds.). (1993). Tasks in a pedagogical context: integrating theory and practice. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters

Cumming, A. (1985). Responding to the writing of ESL students. Highway One, 8, 58–78Google Scholar

Cumming, A. (2003). Experienced ESL/EFL writing instructors' conceptualizations of their teaching: curriculum options and implications. In B. Kroll (ed.), Exploring the dynamics of second language writing (pp. 71–92). New York: Cambridge University PressCrossRef

Cunningsworth, A. (1995). Choosing your coursebook. Oxford: Heinemann

Daedalus. (1997). Integrated Writing Environment [Computer Software]. Austin, TX: The Daedalus Group

Davies, A., Brown, A., Elder, C., Hill, K., Lumley, T., and McNamara, T. (1999). Dictionary of language testing. Cambridge: CUP/UCLES

Davis, B., and Thiede, R. (2000). Writing into change: style shifting in asynchronous electronic discourse. In M. Warshauer and R. Kern (eds.), Network-based language teaching: concepts and practice (pp. 87–120). Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRef

Day, R., and Bamford, J. (1998). Extensive reading in the second language classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Larios, J., Murphy, L., and Manchon, R. (1999). The use of restructuring strategies in EFL writing: a study of Spanish learners of English as a Foreign Language. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8, 13–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar

DeMauro, G. (1992). An investigation of the appropriateness of theTOEFLtest as a matching variable to equateTWEtopics. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service Report No. 37

Denzin, N., and Lincoln, Y (eds.). (1998). Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage

Douglas, D. (2000). Assessing languages for specific purposes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Dudeny, G. (2000). The internet and the language classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Dudley-Evans, T., and St John, M.-J. (1998). Developments in English for specific purposes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Elbow, P. (1998). Writing with power: techniques for mastering the writing process. New York: Oxford University Press

Ellis, R. (1987). Contextual variability in second language acquisition and the relevancy of language teaching. In R. Ellis (ed.), Second language acquisition in context (pp. 179–94). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall

Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Ellis, R. (1999). Input-based approaches to teaching grammar: a review of classroom-oriented research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 19, 64–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Faigley, L. (1986). Competing theories of process: a critique and a proposal. College English, 48, 527–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fathman, A., and Whalley, E. (1990). Teacher response to student writing: focus on form versus content. In B. Kroll (ed.), Second language writing: research insights for the classroom (pp. 178–90). Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRef

Feez, S. (1998). Text-based syllabus design. Sydney: Mcquarie University/AMES

Ferris, D. (1997). The influence of teacher commentary on student revision. TESOL Quarterly, 31(2), 315–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ferris, D. (2002). Treatment of error in second language student writing. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press

Ferris, D., and Hedgcock, J. S. (1998). TeachingESLcomposition: purpose, process, practice. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum

Ferris, D., Pezone, S., Tade, C., and Tinti, S. (1997). Teacher commentary on student writing: descriptions and implications. Journal of Second Language Writing, 6, 155–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Flower, L. (1989). Cognition, context and theory building. College Composition and Communication, 40, 282–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Flower, L. (1994). The construction of negotiated meaning: A social cognitive theory of writing. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press

Flower, L., and Hayes, J. (1980). The cognition of discovery: defining a rhetorical problem. College Composition and Communication, 31, 21–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Flower, L., and Hayes, J. (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication, 32, 365–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Flowerdew, J. (1999). Problems in writing for scholarly publication in English: the case of Hong Kong. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8 (3): 243–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Freadman, A. (1994). Anyone for tennis? In A. Freadman and P. Medway (eds.), Genre and the new rhetoric (pp. 43–66). London: Taylor & Francis

Friere, P. (1974). Education for critical consciousness. London: Sheed and Ward

Gere, A. (1987). Writing groups: history, theory, and implications. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press

Gerrard, L. (1989). Computers and basic writers: a critical view. In G. Hawisher and C. Selfe (eds.), Critical perspectives on computers and composition instruction (pp. 94–108). New York: Teachers' College Press

Goldstein, L., and Conrad, S. (1990). Student input and negotiation of meaning in ESL writing conferences. TESOL Quarterly, 24(3): 443–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grabe, W. (2001). Reading-writing relations: theoretical perspectives and institutional practices. In D. Belcher and A. Hirvela (eds.), Linking literacies: perspectives on L2 reading and writing connections (pp. 15–47). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press

Grabe, W. (2003). Reading and writing relations: L2 perspectives on research and practice. In B. Kroll (ed.), Exploring the dynamics of second language writing (pp. 242–61). New York: Cambridge University PressCrossRef

Grabe, W., and Kaplan, R. (1996). Theory and practice of writing. Harlow: Longman

Grellet, F. (1996). Writing for advanced learners of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Haas, C. (1994). Learning to read biology: One student's rhetorical development in college. Written Communication, 11(1), 43–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hadfield, J. (1992). Classroom dynamics. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar (2nd ed.). London: Edward Arnold

Halliday, M. A. K., and Hasan, R. (1989). Language, context and text: aspects of language in a social semiotic perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Hamp-Lyons, L. (ed). (1991). Assessing second language writing in academic contexts. Norwood, NJ: Ablex

Hamp-Lyons, L., and Condon, W. (1993). Questioning assumptions about portfolio-based assessment. College Composition and Communication, 44(2), 176–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hamp-Lyons, L., and Condon, W. (2000). Assessing the portfolio: principles for practice, theory and research. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press

Hamp-Lyons, L., and Heasley, B. (1987). Study writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Harmer, J. (2001). The practice of English language teaching. Harlow: Pearson Education

Hawisher, G., and Selfe, C. (eds.). (1989). Critical perspectives on computers and composition instruction. New York: Teachers' College Press

Heath, S. B. (1991). The sense of being literate: historical and cross-cultural features. In R. Barr, M. Kamil, P. Mosentahl, and P. Pearson (eds.), Handbook of reading research, vol. I (pp. 3–25). New York: Longman

Hedgcock, J., and Lefkowitz, N. (1992). Collaborative oral/aural revision in foreign language writing instruction. Journal of Second Language Writing, 1, 255–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hedge, T. (2000). Teaching and learning in the language classroom. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Henry, A., and Roseberry, R. (2001). A narrow-angled corpus analysis of moves and strategies of the genre: “letter of application.”English for Specific Purposes, 20(2), 153–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hinds, J. (1987). Reader versus writer responsibility: A new typology. In U. Connor and R. B. Kaplan (eds.), Writing across languages: analysis of L2 text. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley

Hinkel, E. (ed.). (1999). Culture in second language teaching and learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Hitchcock, G., and Hughes, D. (1995). Research and the teacher. London: Routledge

Hoey, M. (1983). On the surface of discourse. London: Allen & Unwin

Holliday, A. (1994). Appropriate methodology and social context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Holliday, A., and Cook, T. (1982). An ecological approach to ESP. Issues in ESP. Lancaster Papers in ELT, 5, 123–43Google Scholar

Holst, J. K. (1993). Writ 101: Writing English. Wellington, NZ: Victoria University

Hopkins, D. (1993). A teacher's guide to classroom research. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press

Hughes, A. (1989). Testing for language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Hunt, K. (1983). Sentence combining and the teaching of writing. In M. Martlew (ed.), The psychology of written language: a developmental approach (pp. 99–125). New York: Wiley

Hutchison, T., and Waters, A. (1987). English for specific purposes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Hyland, F. (1998). The impact of teacher-written feedback on individual writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 7(3), 255–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hyland, F. (2000). ESL writers and feedback: giving more autonomy to learners. Language Teaching Research, 4(1): 33–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hyland, F. (2001). Providing effective support: investigating feedback to distance language learners. Open Learning, 16(3), 233–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hyland, F., and Hyland, K. (2001). Sugaring the pill: praise and criticism in written feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 10(3), 185–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hyland, K. (1990). Providing productive feedback. ELT Journal, 44(4), 279–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hyland, K. (1993). ESL computer writers: what can we do to help? System, 21(1), 21–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hyland, K. (1994). The learning styles of Japanese students. JALT Journal, 16(1), 55–74Google Scholar

Hyland, K. (1998). Hedging in scientific research articles. Amsterdam: John Benjamins

Hyland, K. (1999). Talking to students: metadiscourse in introductory textbooks. English for Specific Purposes, 18(1), 3–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hyland, K. (2000). Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. London: Longman

Hyland, K. (2002). Genre: language, context and literacy. In M. McGroaty (ed.), Annual review of applied linguistics, vol. 22: 113–35CrossRef

Hyland, K. (2003). Genre-based pedagogies: a social response to process. Journal of Second Language Writing 12(1), 17–29CrossRef

Janopoulos, M. (1992). University faculty tolerance of NS and NNS writing errors. Journal of Second Language Writing, 1, 109–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jenkins, S., Jordan, M., and Weiland, P. (1993). The role of writing in graduate engineering education: a survey of faculty beliefs and practices. English for Specific Purposes, 12, 51–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johns, A. M. (1997). Text, role and context: developing academic literacies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Johnson, K., and Johnson, G. (1999). Teachers understanding teaching. Boston: Heinle & Heinle

Jolly, D., and Bolitho, R. (1998). A framework for materials writing. In B. Tomlinson (ed.), Materials development in language teaching (pp. 90–115). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Jordan, B. (1990). Academic writing course. London: Collins

Kachru, Y. (1996). Culture in rhetorical styles: contrastive rhetoric and world Englishes. In N. Mercer and J. Swann (eds.), Learning English: development and diversity (pp. 305–14). London: Routledge

Kahtani, S. (1999). Electronic portfolios in ESL writing: an alternative approach. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 12, 261–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaplan, R. (1966). Cultural thought patterns in intercultural education. Language Learning, 16, 1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaplan, R. (1987). Cultural thought patterns revisited. In U. Connor and R. Kaplan (eds.), Writing across languages. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley

Kaplan, R., and Shaw, P. (1983). Exploring academic discourse. Singapore: HarperCollins

Knapp, P., and Watkins, M. (1994). Context-text-grammar: teaching the genres and grammar of school writing in infants and primary classrooms. Sydney: Text productions

Knobel, M., Lankshear, C., Honan, E., and Crawford, J. (1998). The wired world of second language education. In I. Snyder (ed.), Page to Screen: taking literacy into the electronic era (pp. 20–50). London: RoutledgeCrossRef

Knoblauch, C., and Brannon, L. (1981). Teacher commentary on student writing: the state of the art. Freshman English News, 10, 1–4Google Scholar

Knoblauch, C., and Brannon, L. (1984). Rhetorical traditions and the teaching of writing. Upper Montclair, NJ: Boynton/Cook

Kramsch, C. (1993). Context and culture in language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Krapels, A. (1990). An overview of second language writing process research. In B. Kroll (ed.), Second language writing: insights for the writing classroom (pp. 37–56). Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRef

Krashen, S. (1993). The power of reading: insights from the research. Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited

Kroll, B. (2002). Considerations for teaching an ESL/EFL writing course. In M. Celce-Murcia (ed.), Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language (3rd ed.). Boston: Heinle & Heinle

Kroll, B., and Reid, J. (1994). Guidelines for designing writing prompts: clarifications, caveats and cautions. Journal of Second Language Writing, 3(3), 231–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lankshear, C., and Snyder, I. (2000). Teachers and techno-literacy. St. Leonards, Australia: Allen & Unwin

Lantolf, J. P. (1999). Second culture acquisition: cognitive considerations. In E. Hinkel (ed.), Culture in second language teaching and learning (pp. 28–46). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Larsen-Freeman, D., and Long, M. (1991). An introduction to second language acquisition research. London: Longman

Lave, J., and Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Leki, I. (1990). Coaching from the margins: issues in written response. In B. Kroll (ed.), Second language writing: insights from the language classroom (pp. 57–68). Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRef

Leki, I. (1992). UnderstandingESLwriters: a guide for teachers. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook

Leki, I., and Carson, J. (1997). Completely different worlds: EAP and the writing experiences of ESL students in university courses. TESOL Quarterly, 31: 231–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lock, G., and Lockhart, C. (1999). Genres in an academic writing class. Hong Kong Journal of Applied Linguistics, 3(2), 47–64Google Scholar

Lockhart, C., and Ng, P. (1995). Analysing talk in peer response groups: stances, functions and content. Language Learning, 45, 605–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Macken-Horarik, M. (1996). Construing the invisible: specialized literacy practices in junior secondary English. Ph. D. thesis: University of Sydney

Macken-Horarik, M. (2002). “Something to shoot for”: a Systemic Functional approach to teaching genre in secondary school science. In A. Johns (ed.), Genre in the classroom: multiple perspectives (pp. 21–46). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum

Mager, R. (1975). Preparing instructional objectives. Palo Alto: Fearon

Markus, H., and Kitayama, S. (1991). Cultures and the self: implications for cognition, emotion and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Martin, J. R. (1989). Factual writing: exploring and challenging social reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Martin, J. R. (1992). English text: system and structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins

Master, P. (1995). Consciousness raising and article pedagogy. In D. Belcher and G. Braine (eds.), Academic writing in a second language (pp. 183–205). Norwood, NJ: Ablex

Mauranen, A. (1993). Contrastive ESP rhetoric: Metatext in Finnish-English Economics Texts. English for Specific Purposes, 12, 3–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McCarthey, S. J. (1992). The teacher, the author, and the text: variations in form and content of writing conferences. Journal of Reading Behaviour, 24(1), 51–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McDonough, J., and McDonough, S. (1997). Research methods for English language teachers. London: Arnold

McDonough, J., and Shaw, C. (eds.). (1993). Materials and methods inELT. Oxford: Blackwell

McNamara, T. (1996). Measuring second language performance. London: Longman

Mendoca, C., and Johnson, K. (1994). Peer review negotiations; revision activities in ESL writing instruction. TESOL Quarterly, 28(4), 745–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In R. Linn (ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed.) (pp. 13–103). New York: Macmillan

Messick, S. (1996). Validity and washback in language testing. Language Testing, 13, 241–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Miles, M. and Huberman, A. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage

Milton, J. (1997). Providing computerized self-access opportunities for the development of writing skills. In P. Benson and P. Voller (eds.), Autonomy and independence in language learning (pp. 204–14). London: Longman

Milton, J. (1999a). Lexical thickets and electronic gateways: making text accessible by novice writers. In C. N. Candlin and K. Hyland (eds.), Writing: texts, processes and practices (pp. 221–43). London: Longman

Milton, J. (1999b). WordPilot 2000 (Computer program). Hong Kong: CompuLang

Mittan, R. (1989). The peer review process: harnessing students' communicative power. In D. Johnson and D. Roen (eds.), Richness in writing: empoweringESLstudents (pp. 207–19). New York: Longman

Moffett, J. (1982). Writing, inner speech and mediation. College English, 44, 231–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mohan, B. (1986). Language and content. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley

Murray, D. (1985). A writer teaches writing (2nd ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin

Nation, P. (1990). Teaching and learning vocabulary. New York: Heinle & Heinle

Nelson, J. (1993). The library revisited: exploring students' research processes. In A. Penrose and B. Sitcoe (eds.), Hearing ourselves think: cognitive research in the college writing classroom. New York: Oxford University Press

Newkirk, T. (1995). The writing conference as performance. Research in the Teaching of English, 29, 193–215Google Scholar

Nunan, D. (1989). Designing tasks for the communicative classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Nunan, D. (1992). Research methods in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

O'Keefe, J. (2000). Invitation to reading and writing. Englewood Cliffe, NJ: Prentice Hall

Ohta, A. (2000). Rethinking interaction in SLA: developmentally appropriate assistance in the zone of proximal development and the acquisition of L2 grammar. In J. Lantolf (ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Oshima, A., and Hogue, A. (1999). Writing academic English (3rd ed.). London: Longman

Oxford, R., and Anderson, N. (1995). A crosscultural view of learning styles. Language Teaching, 28(201–15)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oxford, R., Hollaway, M., and Horton-Murillo, D. (1992). Language learning styles: Research and practical considerations for teaching in the multicultural tertiary ESL/EFL classroom. System, 4, 439–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Paltridge, B. (2001). Genre and the language learning classroom. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press

Partington, A. (1998). Patterns and meanings: using corpora for English language research and teaching. Amsterdam: Benjamins

Patthey-Chavez, G., and Ferris, D. (1997). Writing conferences and the weaving of multi-voiced texts in college composition. Research in the Teaching of English, 31, 51–90Google Scholar

Pemberton, R., and Toogood, S. (2001). Expectations and assumptions in a self-directed language-learning programme. In M. Mozzon-McPherson and R. Vismans (eds.), Beyond language teaching towards language advising. London: CILT

Pemberton, R., Toogood, S. Ho, S., and Lam, J. (Forthcoming). Learner and advisor expectations in a self-directed language-learning programme: a case study of four learners and four advisers. In D. Bickerton and M. Gottin (eds.), 5thCercleS Conference Proceedings

Pennington, M. C. (1993). A critical examination of word processing effects in relation to L2 writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 2, 227–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pennington, M. (1996). The computer and the non-native writer: a natural partnership. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton

Pennington, M., and Brock, M. (1989). Use of computers in the teaching of ESL writing: effectiveness of text analysis and word processing. University of Hawaii Working Papers in ESL, 8(1), 155–83Google Scholar

Pennycook, A. (1996). Borrowing others' words: text, ownership, memory and plagiarism. TESOL Quarterly, 30, 201–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Peyton, J. K., and Staton, J. (eds.). (1993). Dialogue journals in the multilingual classroom: building language fluency and writing skills through written interaction. Norwood, NJ: Ablex

Phillipson, R. (1992). Linguistic imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Phinney, M. (1991). Computer assisted writing and writing apprehension in ESL students. In P. Dunkel (ed.), Computer assisted language learning and testing: Research issues and practices. New York: Newbury House

Polio, C. (2003). An overview of what we investigate and how. In B. Kroll (ed.), Exploring the dynamics of second language writing. New York: Cambridge University PressCrossRef

Pratt, D. (1980). Curriculum design and development. New York: Harcourt Brace

Purves, A. C. (ed.). (1988). Writing across languages and cultures: Issues in contrastive rhetoric. Newbury Park, CA: Sage

Purves, A., Quattrini, J., and Sullivan, C. (eds.). (1995). Creating the writing portfolio. Lincolnwood, IL: NTC Publishing

Radecki, P., and Swales, J. (1988). ESL student reaction to written comments on their written work. System, 16, 355–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Raimes, A. (1991). Out of the woods: emerging traditions in the teaching of writing. TESOL Quarterly, 25(3), 407–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Raimes, A. (1992). Exploring through writing: a process approach toESLcomposition (2nd ed.). New York: St. Martin's Press

Ramanathan, V., and Atkinson, D. (1999). Individualism, academic writing and ESL writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(1), 45–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reid, J. M. (1987). The learning style preferences of ESL students. TESOL Quarterly, 21(1), 87–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reid, J. M. (1993). TeachingESLwriting. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Regents/Prentice Hall

Reid, J. M. (1994). Responding to ESL students' texts: the myths of appropriation. TESOL Quarterly, 28, 237–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reid, J. M. (2000). The process of composition (3rd ed.). New York: Longman

Reid, J., and Kroll, B. (1995). Designing and assessing effective classroom writing assignments for NES and ESL students. Journal of Second Language Writing, 4(1), 17–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Richards, J. (2001). Curriculum development in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Richards, J., and Lockhart, C. (1994). Reflective teaching in second language classrooms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Riley, P. (1997). The guru and the conjurer: aspects of counselling for self-access. In P. Benson and P. Voller (eds.), Autonomy and independence in language learning (pp. 114–31). London: Longman

Rothery, J. (1986). Teaching writing in the primary school: a genre-based approach to the development of writing abilities. Working Papers in Linguistics: University of Sydney

Rowntree, K. (1991). Writing for success: A practical guide for New Zealand students. Auckland: Longman

Sawyer, W., and Watson, K. (1987). Questions of genre. In I. Reid (ed.), The place of genre in learning: current debates. Deakin: Deakin University Press

Schriver, K. (1992). Teaching writers to anticipate readers' needs. Written Communication, 9(2), 179–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Seal, B. (1997). Academic encounters: content focus human behaviour. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Sheldon, L. (1987). ELTtextbooks and materials: problems in evaluation and development. London: Modern English Pubs and British Council

Silva, T. (1990). Second language composition instruction: developments, issues, and directions. In B. Kroll (ed.), Second language writing: research insights for the classroom (pp. 11–23). Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRef

Silva, T. (1993). Toward an understanding of the distinct nature of L2 writing: the ESL research and its implications. TESOL Quarterly, 27, 665–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Silva, T. (1997). Differences in ESL and Native-English-Speaker writing: the research and its implications. In C. Severino, J. Guena, and J. Butler (eds.), Writing in multicultural settings (pp. 209–19). New York: Modern Language Association of America

Silva, T., Leki, I., and Carson, J. (1997). Broadening the perspective of mainstream composition studies: some thought from the disciplinary margins. Written Communication, 14, 398–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Silva, T., and Reichelt, M. (2003). Second language writing up close and personal: some success stories. In B. Kroll (ed.), Exploring the dynamics of second language writing (pp. 93–114). Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRef

Skehan, P. (1989). Individual differences in second language learning. London: Edward Arnold

Smagorinsky, P. (ed). (1994). Speaking about writing: reflections on research methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage

Snyder, I. (1993). Writing with word processors: a research overview. Educational Research, 35, 49–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Snyder, I. (ed). (1998). Page to screen: taking literacy into the electronic era. London: Routledge

Sommers, N. (1982). Responding to student writing. College Composition and Communication, 33, 148–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Spack, R. (1996). Guidelines (2nd ed.). New York: St. Martin's Press

Stake, R. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage

Stoddard, B., and MacArthur, C. (1993). A peer editor strategy: guiding learning disabled students in response and revision. Research in the Teaching of English, 27(1), 76–103Google Scholar

Stratman, J., and Hamp-Lyons, L. (1994). Reactivity in concurrent think-aloud protocols: issues for research. In P. Smagorinsky (ed.), Speaking about writing (pp. 89–112). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage

Straub, R. (2000). The student, the text, and the classroom context: a case study of student response. Assessing Writing, 7, 23–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Susser, B. (1998). The mysterious disappearance of word processing. Computers and Composition, 15, 347–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Swaffer, J., Romano S., Markley, P., and Arens, K. (eds.). (1998). Language learning online. Austin, TX: Labyrinth

Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Swales, J., and Feak, C. (1994). Academic writing for graduate students: essential tasks and skills. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press

Swales, J., and Feak, C. (2000). English in today's research world: a writing guide. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press

Taylor, T., and Ward, I. (eds.). (1998). Literacy theory in the age of the Internet. New York: Columbia University Press

Tomlinson, B. (ed.). (1998). Materials development in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Tribble, C. (1996). Writing. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Tribble, C., and Jones, G. (1997). Concordances in the classroom. Houston, TX: Athelstan

Truscott, J. (1996). The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes. Language Learning, 46, 327–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tyler, R. (1949). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. New York: Harcourt Brace

Tyner, K. (ed.). (1998). Literacy in a digital world: teaching and learning in the age of information. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum

Ur, P. (1996). A course in language teaching: practice and theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Valero-Garces, C. (1996). Contrastive ESP rhetoric: Metatext in Spanish-English Economics texts. English for Specific Purposes, 15(4), 279–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vanett, L., and Jurich, D. (1990). A context for collaboration: teachers and students writing together. In J. K. Peyton (ed.), Students and teachers writing together (pp. 51–62). Alexandria, VA: TESOL

Villamil, O., and Guerrero, M. (1996). Peer revision in the L2 classroom: social-cognitive activities, mediating strategies, and aspects of social behaviour. Journal of Second Language Writing, 5, 51–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. In M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, and E. Souberman (eds.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

Walker, R. (1996). Doing research: a handbook for teachers. London: Routledge

Wall, D. (1997). Impact and washback in language testing. In C. Clapham (ed.), The Kluwer encyclopedia of language in education, vol. 7: testing and assessment. Dordrecht: KluwerCrossRef

Wallace, M. J. (1998). Action research for language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Warschauer, M. (1995). E-mail for English teaching: bringing the Internet and computer learning networks into the language classroom. Alexandria, VA: Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages

Warschauer, M. (2002). Networking into academic discourse. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 1: 45–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Warschauer, M., and Kern, R. (eds.). (2000). Network-based language teaching: concepts and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Watson-Reekie, C. (1982). The use and abuse of models in the ESL writing class. TESOL Quarterly, 16, 5–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weigle, S. (2002). Assessing writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

White, E. (1994). Teaching and assessing writing (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass

White, R., and Arndt, V. (1991). Process writing. Harlow, UK: Longman

Wichmann, A., Fligelstone, S., McEnery, T., and Knowles, G. (eds.). (1997). Teaching and language corpora. London: Longman

Windeatt, S., Hardisty, D., and Eastment, D. (2000). The Internet. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Wright, T. (1987). Roles of teachers and learners. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Wu, M. H. (1992). Towards a contextual lexico-grammar: An application of concordance analysis in EST teaching. RELC Journal, 23(2), 18–34Google Scholar

Yalden, J. (1987). The communicative syllabus. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall

Zamel, V. (1983). The composing processes of advanced ESL students: six case studies. TESOL Quarterly, 17, 165–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zamel, V. (1985). Responding to writing. TESOL Quarterly, 19(1), 79–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zamel, V. (1997). Towards a model of transculturation. TESOL Quarterly, 31, 341–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zhang, S. (1995). Reexamining the affective advantage of peer feedback in the ESL writing class. Journal of Second Language Writing, 4, 209–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar