Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
  • Cited by 22
Publisher:
Cambridge University Press
Online publication date:
June 2012
Print publication year:
2010
Online ISBN:
9780511750663

Book description

Seeing Wittgenstein Anew is a collection which examines Ludwig Wittgenstein's remarks on the concept of aspect-seeing, showing that it was not simply one more topic of investigation in Wittgenstein's later writings but rather a pervasive and guiding concept in his efforts to turn philosophy's attention to the actual conditions of our common life in language. The essays in this 2010 volume open up novel paths across familiar fields of thought: the objectivity of interpretation, the fixity of the past, the acquisition of language, and the nature of human consciousness. Significantly, they exemplify how continuing consideration of the interrelated phenomena of aspect-seeing might produce a fruitful way of doing philosophy in a new century.

Reviews

'… the articles open a new path of inquiry, one that could not have been opened without the connection to aspect-seeing … the book contains many more successful arguments for seeing Wittgenstein anew.'

Source: Journal of the History of Philosophy

Refine List

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
×

Contents


Page 1 of 2


  • 1 - Aesthetic Analogies
    pp 23-39
  • View abstract

    Summary

    This chapter discusses examples of visual experience and Wittgenstein's remarks about "seeing-as" in Part II, Section 11 of Philosophical Investigations. Wittgenstein remains preoccupied with differences among concepts of "seeing" and with philosophy's difference from psychology. Yet questions about capacity of "noticing an aspect", and topics of experience and of interpretation, are central concerns of aesthetics and criticism. The questions about experience or interpretation or noticing an aspect can be found to like questions that we encounter in aesthetics. Wittgenstein also considers general statements about perception or visual experience that we might derive from what we say and do in such cases. Traditional conceptions of form in the visual arts are perfectly analogous to Wittgenstein's examples of seeing-as. Kant's account of form, natural and artificial objects, including works of art, may be judged to be beautiful. His account of aesthetical ideas pertains to beautiful art defined as fine arts nowadays.
  • 2 - Aspects, Sense, and Perception
    pp 40-60
  • View abstract

    Summary

    Contemporary interpretations of phenomenology, as well as current theories of perception, define perception (and seeing) in terms of sense. This chapter brings out certain difficulties for the idea of perceptual sense, difficulties raised by Wittgenstein (and Austin). These difficulties come from the specific point of view of ordinary language philosophy. Talk of perceptual sense takes its start in Frege's notion of sense. This notion was the basis for the so-called Fregean readings of phenomenology. The criticisms in Austin's Sense and Sensibilia, though leveled directly at traditional empiricism, are perhaps even more useful today, now that a whole analysis of perception has been worked out in terms of sense. A phenomenon is not a symptom or a sign of something else that is real: on this point, Wittgenstein and Austin agree. Wittgenstein shows that the myth of seeing as an activity is bound up with a myth of seeing as passivity.
  • 3 - An Allegory of Affinities
    pp 61-80
  • On Seeing a World of Aspects in a Universe of Things
  • View abstract

    Summary

    Wittgenstein speaks more often of the mythological than of the allegorical. The immediate reason for using the word "allegory" to characterize this approach is to recapture something of the concepts and argument in Part IV of The Claim of Reason. Cavell's actual claims on behalf of "the allegory of words" are somewhat modest. What Wittgenstein means by "metaphysics" relentlessly tends to picture the world as a universe of things and their properties, or facts and their arrangements. Wittgenstein suggests a connection between "seeing an aspect" and "experiencing the meaning of a word". Cavell develops these connections in ways no one else foresaw and that have proved difficult to make use of. In insisting on using "aspect", Wittgenstein insists that the intimacy of the world, its affinity for us, is not based on its depth.
  • 4 - The Touch of Words
    pp 81-98
  • View abstract

    Summary

    The principal phenomenon Cora Diamond considers in one of her texts is that of understanding our relation to the non-human world of animals, most extendedly the relation or relations in the mass preparation of animals as food for humans, and she approaches it importantly through her responses to a pair of stories by J. M. Coetzee. Coetzee is careful to have various characters voice their disapproval, to put it mildly, of Costello's comparison of the business of mass animal butchery with the Nazi organization of the gassing and burning of Jews. She says, speaking of her concealed and unconcealed wound, that "it is touched on in every word I speak". A striking idea among Wittgenstein's remarks about seeing aspects is his saying that the importance of the concept lies in its connection with experiencing the meaning of a word and with our attachment to our words.
  • II.1 - Self-Knowledge
  • View abstract

    Summary

    This chapter focuses on the epistemological intuitions that import into the proceedings from the outset expectations about what conditions must be satisfied in order to arrive at a true proposition with self-revelatory content. It highlights that it is easy, when reflecting in a preliminary way about the kind of autobiographical understanding that comes from a grasp of one's past, to conceive of the problem as a polarized epistemological dichotomy. Iris Murdoch emphatically asserts that the past, properly understood, should be "unfrozen", and that one has no less than a moral obligation to "re-think". The chapter further talks about two pole models. In the first one the narrative self is indeed a narrative construction, and in the second one the narrative self is one that is constituted not by present active retrospection but rather by the passive, factually constrained accurate memory of those past episodes of one's life.
  • 6 - The Bodily Root
    pp 120-140
  • Seeing Aspects and Inner Experience
  • View abstract

    Summary

    From the very beginning of his philosophical work, Wittgenstein was concerned with "seeing". This chapter shows that the generalized blindness involved in Frazer's stance and extended by Wittgenstein to the traditional philosophy is a main concern behind the exploration of "seeing aspects". Trapped in the scientific attitude, Frazer assumed that ritual practices result from empirical beliefs or opinions, and so he was unable to see them as any more than superstitions or incipient attempts at science. Wittgenstein argues that Frazer was bound to miss their significance insofar as he attempted to understand and explain them in terms of their external relations of rationality or causality. Wittgenstein's proposal involves change in attitude, deliberate grammatical openness and receptivity to the natural gesturality of language and the underlying, pulsating activity of the body.
  • 7 - (Ef)facing the Soul
    pp 143-161
  • Wittgenstein and Materialism
  • View abstract

    Summary

    Wittgenstein is unrelenting in his attempts to turn us away from an "occult" or "magical" conception of the mind, as a place or realm where meaning happens, where reference is effected, where explanations come to an end not with satisfaction, but out of desperation. This aspect of Wittgenstein's philosophy is, of course, what brings upon it the charge of behaviorism, and one reason why Cavell, for example, declares that Wittgenstein's philosophy "takes the risk of apsychism. According to the eliminativist, the conceptual repertoire of folk psychology is a kind of hypothesis concerning the internal workings of human beings. The eliminativist, by casting our ordinary psychological concepts in the role of a theory about the inner workings of the human body (treating joy, for example, as an "inward thing"), denies precisely the kind of transparency Wittgenstein attributes to the face.
  • 8 - Wittgenstein on Aspect-Seeing, the Nature of Discursive Consciousness, and the Experience of Agency
    pp 162-180
  • View abstract

    Summary

    Consciousness or awareness is possessed by a wide range of higher chordates. Genuine discursive consciousness is possessed, at least in its complex forms, only by human beings. Aspect-seeing centrally involves doing something: mastering a technique and acting according to it (or extending it), as a result of "taking to" joint attentional interactions. Wittgenstein's treatment of aspect-seeing offers us a way of thinking about human discursive consciousness that is neither mentalist, nor materialist, nor social constructivist, nor any kind of explanation. It is rather an elucidatory redescription of what we do when we employ concepts within acts of seeing. Wittgenstein is defending both the priority of practice over theoretical representation and the irreducibility of agency to material processes. Neither conceptual practice nor anyone's actively "taking to it" can be reduced to independent and self-subsistent material or mental processes.
  • 9 - The Philosophical Significance of Meaning-Blindness
    pp 183-203
  • View abstract

    Summary

    This chapter explores how Wittgenstein's investigations of aspect-seeing and related topics in Part II, Section 11 of Philosophical Investigations contribute to our understanding of his views on the nature of philosophical conflicts and confusions, of his diagnosis of our "tendency to sublime the logic of our language", and of his own critical methods. In the course of examining the role of images in the perception of aspects, Wittgenstein points out that seeing aspects require a capacity for imagination, for example, for relating the object seen to other objects not currently in view. Wittgenstein, then, delivers no direct answers to the questions we want to pose about meaning-blindness. The meaning-blindness may prove incapable of modifying familiar concepts, or of improvising on novel occasions, or even of making judgments that involve projecting a word with its customary meaning into new, non-stereotypical situations, of seeing new uses as extensions of old ones.
  • 10 - Wanting to Say Something
    pp 204-224
  • Aspect-Blindness and Language
  • View abstract

    Summary

    The mystery of why Wittgenstein takes an interest in the concept of aspect-seeing may be trumped only by the enigma of why he introduces the concept of aspect-blindness. We can find our way with aspect-blindness most easily if we begin by noting what aspect-blindness is not. The experience of having an aspect dawn, or of being struck by something, or of seeing the familiar in a new light, is thus as intimately and pervasively joined to the human form of life as talking. In this chapter, the author suggests that Wittgenstein's interest in the concept of aspect-blindness develops out of a preoccupation (found in Part I of the Investigations) with our attraction to the familiar philosophical ideal of perfect, mutual intelligibility that is the prize we would gain with the "solution" to the problem of meaning.
  • IV.1 - Therapy
  • View abstract

    Summary

    The real difficulty in coming to terms with Wittgenstein's teaching emerges when philosophers turn from talking about that teaching to actually doing philosophy that's supposed to proceed in its light. This chapter illuminates the nature of the difficulty by attending carefully to the way it manifests itself in a recent article by Stephen Mulhall on Wittgenstein's remarks on seeing aspects. It argues that Wittgenstein's remarks are meant to bring us back to, or project us into, situations of speech, or anyway situations in which words are called for particular words whereby we are meant to discover things about the meanings of the words we utter, things that we cannot have failed to know, and yet things that are, for some reason, hard to see. Mulhall's interpretation looks to find in Wittgenstein's remarks a very different kind of satisfaction, or peace, from that which they are designed to enable.
  • 12 - The Work of Wittgenstein's Words
    pp 249-267
  • A Reply to Baz
  • View abstract

    Summary

    This chapter restricts itself to defending the coherence of the author's reading against Avner Baz's critique. There is a structural obstacle in the way of determining exactly what weight to attach to the precise forms and general organization of Wittgenstein's remarks in Part II, Section 11 of Philosophical Investigations, and indeed of the writing that constitutes the whole of that part of the book. Despite the fact that the author's discussion begins by explicitly distinguishing three implications of Wittgenstein's remarks, Baz's summary of it simply runs them together. The strategy of the author's writings on seeing aspects is to reduce our sense of puzzlement about aspect-dawning by relocating it in the broader context of our lives with pictures; that context is hidden from us (and by us) because of its simplicity and familiarity, and it evades our notice precisely because it pervades our form of life.
  • 13 - On the Difficulty of Seeing Aspects and the “Therapeutic” Reading of Wittgenstein
    pp 268-288
  • View abstract

    Summary

    The distinctive character of Wittgenstein's manner of writing, early and late, must play an important role in accounting for the diverse ways in which it has been approached and engaged. When thinking of Wittgenstein on seeing aspects it is natural to think first and primarily of the remarks in Part II, Section 11 of Philosophical Investigations. Wittgenstein (often) writes in response to a sense that the possibility of various phenomena, for example, meaning, understanding, naming, following a rule, knowing another, has become mysterious to us, and that our efforts to account for their possibility, for example, by supposing underlying mental acts, universals, a pure logical order, only make matters more mysterious. He directs our attention differently to what is evident: the ordinary circumstances of phenomena of which we are aware but which we, for various reasons, dismiss as merely incidental or irrelevant.
  • 14 - Overviews
    pp 291-313
  • What Are They of and What Are They For?
  • View abstract

    Summary

    Wittgenstein's counsel to seek overviews has negative and positive sides. The negative is comparatively straightforward and comprises what Brian Clack refers to as the "prohibition on explanation". The term "synoptic sensibility" refers to the satisfaction taken in overviews, irrespective of any contribution they might make to the explanation of the phenomena of which they afford a perspicuous view. It is obvious that the heuristic rationale does not exhaust the appeal of overviews for Wittgenstein. The case for a synoptic, non-explanatory rationale for Goffman's dealings with presentational phenomena is even stronger than in the case of Wittgenstein's dealings with ritual. The aim of a self-clarificatory overview is to achieve a clearer realization of what it is that constrains the course of our thoughts on certain matters and confers on our recurrent ruminations their distinctive character.
  • 15 - On Being Surprised
    pp 314-337
  • Wittgenstein on Aspect-Perception, Logic, and Mathematics
  • View abstract

    Summary

    Wittgenstein's remarks invoking aspect-perception highlight his overall development as a philosopher. Like Kant, Wittgenstein hoped to reorient the notion of "discovery" as it plays a role in discussions of logic, mathematics, and philosophy, critiquing the idea that the mathematician or philosopher uncovers surprising novel facts and objects. Unlike Kant, Wittgenstein replaces this with the idea that the mathematician allows us to "see the value of a mathematical train of thought in its bringing to light something that surprises us". Wittgenstein therefore points toward the importance of active arrangement of concepts and symbols, open-ended self-discovery, pleasure, and absorbed intuitive preoccupation with diagrams and symbols as ineradicable features of our philosophical, logical, and mathematical activities. There is nothing objectionable per se, on Wittgenstein's view, with relying on pictures, diagrams, and other visible symbolic and representational structures.

Page 1 of 2


List of Works Cited
Affeldt, Steven G.Captivating Pictures and Liberating Language: Freedom as the Achievement of Speech in Wittgenstein's Philosophical Investigations.” Philosophical Topics 27 (1999 CrossRef | Google Scholar): 255–85.
Affeldt, Steven G.The Ground of Mutuality: Criteria, Judgment, and Intelligibility in Stephen Mulhall and Stanley Cavell.” European Journal of Philosophy 6 (April 1998 CrossRef | Google Scholar): 1–31.
Aldrich, Virgil C.An Aspect Theory of Mind.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 26 (March 1966 CrossRef | Google Scholar): 313–26.
Aldrich, Virgil C.Philosophy of Art. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1963 Google Scholar.
Aristotle. Physics. Edited by Ross, W. D.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1936 Google Scholar.
Augustine. Confessions. Translated by Outler, Albert C.. Translation revised by Mark Vessey. New York: Barnes and Noble, 2007 Google Scholar.
Austin, J. L.How to Do Things with Words. Edited by Urmson, J. O. and Sbisà, Marina. 2d ed. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1975 CrossRef | Google Scholar.
Austin, J. L. Google Scholar “The Meaning of a Word.” In Austin, Philosophical Papers, 55–75.
Austin, J. L. Google Scholar “Other Minds.” In Austin, Philosophical Papers, 76–116.
Austin, J. L. Google Scholar “A Plea for Excuses.” In Austin, Philosophical Papers, 175–204.
Austin, J. L.Philosophical Papers. Edited by Urmson, J. O. and Warnock, G. J.. Third Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1979 CrossRef | Google Scholar.
Austin, J. L.Sense and Sensibilia. Edited by Warnock, G. J.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1962 Google Scholar.
Austin, J. L. Google Scholar “Truth.” In Austin, Philosophical Papers, 117–33.
Austin, J. L., and others. “Discussion générale.” In Cahiers de Royaumont, Philosophie No. 4, La Philosophie Analytique, 330–80. Paris: Editions de Minuit, 1962 Google Scholar.
Auxier, Randall E., and Hahn, Lewis Edwin, eds. The Philosophy of Jaakko Hintikka. Library of Living Philosophers, vol. 30. Chicago: Open Court, 2006 Google Scholar.
Baker, Gordon. Wittgenstein's Method: Neglected Aspects. Edited by Morris, Katherine. Oxford: Blackwell, 2004 CrossRef | Google Scholar.
Baker, G. P. and Hacker, P. M. S.. Wittgenstein: Understanding and Meaning. Oxford: Blackwell, 1980 Google Scholar.
Batkin, Norton. “Formalism in Analytic Aesthetics.” In Encyclopedia of Aesthetics, edited by Kelly, Michael, 2:217–21. 4 vols. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998 Google Scholar.
Batkin, Norton. Photography and Philosophy. New York: Garland Publishing, 1990 Google Scholar.
Baxandall, Michael. Giotto and the Orators: Humanist Observers of Painting in Italy and the Discovery of Pictorial Composition 1350–1450. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1971 Google Scholar.
Baz, Avner. “Seeing Aspects and Philosophical Difficulty.” In The Oxford Handbook of Wittgenstein, edited by McGinn, Marie and Kuusela, Oskari. Oxford Google Scholar: Oxford University Press, forthcoming.
Baz, Avner. “What's the Point of Seeing Aspects?Philosophical Investigations 23 (April 2000 CrossRef | Google Scholar): 97–121.
Bearn, Gordon C. F.Waking to Wonder: Wittgenstein's Existential Investigations. Albany, N.Y.: State University of New York Press, 1997 Google Scholar.
Bearn, Gordon C. F.Wittgenstein and the Uncanny.” Soundings 76, no. 1 (1993 Google Scholar): 29–58.
Bergson, Henri. Time and Free Will: An Essay on the Immediate Data of Consciousness. New York: Harper and Row, 1960 Google Scholar.
Blanchot, Maurice. “Thinking the Apocalypse: A Letter from Maurice Blanchot to Catherine David.” Critical Inquiry 15 (Winter 1989 CrossRef | Google Scholar): 475–80.
Breithaupt, Fritz, Raatzsch, Richard, and Kremberg, Bettina, eds. Goethe and Wittgenstein: Seeing the World's Unity in Its Variety. Wittgenstein Studien, band 5. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 2002 Google Scholar.
Budd, Malcolm. Wittgenstein's Philosophy of Psychology. London: Routledge, 1991 Google Scholar.
Capek, Karel. Intimate Things. London: Allen and Unwin, 1935 Google Scholar.
Cavell, Stanley Google Scholar. “Aesthetic Problems of Modern Philosophy.” In Cavell, Must We Mean What We Say?, 86–96.
Cavell, Stanley Google Scholar. “Austin at Criticism.” In Cavell, Must We Mean What We Say?, 97–114.
Cavell, Stanley Google Scholar “The Availability of Wittgenstein's Later Philosophy.” In Cavell, Must We Mean What We Say?, 44–72.
Cavell, Stanley Google Scholar “The Avoidance of Love: A Reading of King Lear.” In Cavell, Must We Mean What We Say?, 267–353.
Cavell, StanleyThe Claim of Reason: Wittgenstein, Skepticism, Morality, and Tragedy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1979 Google Scholar.
Cavell, Stanley Google Scholar “Companionable Thinking.” In Crary, Wittgenstein and the Moral Life, 281–98.
Cavell, Stanley Google Scholar “Declining Decline: Wittgenstein as a Philosopher of Culture.” In This New Yet Unapproachable America: Lectures after Emerson after Wittgenstein, 29–75.
Cavell, StanleyThe Division of Talent.” Critical Inquiry 11 (June 1985 CrossRef | Google Scholar): 519–38.
Cavell, StanleyIn Quest of the Ordinary: Lines of Skepticism and Romanticism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1988 Google Scholar.
Cavell, Stanley “The Investigations' Everyday Aesthetics of Itself.” In The Cavell Reader, 369–89. Edited by Mulhall, Stephen. Oxford: Blackwell, 1996 Google Scholar.
Cavell, Stanley Google Scholar “Knowing and Acknowledging.” In Cavell, Must We Mean What We Say?, 238–66.
Cavell, Stanley Google Scholar “Music Discomposed.” In Cavell, Must We Mean What We Say?, 180–212.
Cavell, StanleyMust We Mean What We Say? A Book of Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1969 Google Scholar.
Cavell, Stanley “Notes and Afterthoughts on the Opening of Wittgenstein's Investigations.” In Philosophical Passages: Wittgenstein, Emerson, Austin, Derrida, 125–86. The Bucknell Lectures in Literary Theory, vol. 12. Oxford: Blackwell, 1995 Google Scholar.
Cavell, StanleyPursuits of Happiness: The Hollywood Comedy of Remarriage. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1981 Google Scholar.
Cavell, Stanley “Something Out of the Ordinary.” In Philosophy the Day After Tomorrow, 7–27. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2005 Google Scholar.
Cavell, StanleyThis New Yet Unapproachable America: Lectures after Emerson after Wittgenstein. Albuquerque, N.M.: Living Batch Press, 1989 Google Scholar.
Cavell, Stanley Google Scholar “The Wittgensteinian Event.” In Crary and Shieh, Reading Cavell, 8–25.
Cavell, Stanley, Diamond, Cora, McDowell, John, Hacking, Ian, and Wolfe, Cary. Philosophy and Animal Life. New York: Columbia University Press, 2008 Google Scholar.
Churchland, Paul M.Matter and Consciousness. Revised ed. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1988 Google Scholar.
Cioffi, Frank. Freud and the Question of Pseudoscience. Chicago: Open Court, 1998 Google Scholar.
Cavell, StanleyThe Propaedeutic Delusion.” History of the Human Sciences 13, no. 1 (2000 Google Scholar): 109–23.
Cioffi, Frank “Stating the Obvious.” In Erving Goffman, edited by Fine, Gary Alan and Smith, Gregory W. H., Part Four: Methods. 4 vols. Masters in Modern Social Thought Series. London: Sage Publications, 2000 Google Scholar.
Cioffi, FrankWittgenstein on Freud and Frazer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998 CrossRef | Google Scholar.
Clack, Brian. Wittgenstein, Frazer and Religion. New York: Palgrave, 1998 Google Scholar.
Coetzee, J. M.Elizabeth Costello. New York: Viking, 2003 Google Scholar.
Coetzee, J. M.The Lives of Animals. Edited by Gutmann, Amy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1999 Google Scholar.
Coleridge, Samuel Taylor. The Statesman's Manual, 437–8. Edited by Shedd, W. G. T.. New York, 1875. Quoted in Angus Fletcher, Allegory: The Theory of a Symbolic Mode (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1964 Google Scholar), 16 n. 29.
Collingwood, R. G.The Principles of Art. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1938 Google Scholar.
Conradi, Peter J.Iris Murdoch: A Life. New York: W. W. Norton, 2001 Google Scholar.
Crary, Alice, ed. Wittgenstein and the Moral Life: Essays in Honor of Cora Diamond. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2007 Google Scholar.
Crary, Alice, and Read, Rupert, eds. The New Wittgenstein. London: Routledge, 2000 CrossRef | Google Scholar.
Crary, Alice, and Shieh, Sanford, eds. Reading Cavell. London: Routledge, 2006 Google Scholar.
Davidson, Donald Google Scholar. “The Emergence of Thought.” In Davidson, Subjective, Intersubjective, Objective, 123–34.
Cavell, Stanley Google Scholar “The Second Person.” In Davidson, Subjective, Intersubjective, Objective, 107–21.
Davidson, DonaldSubjective, Intersubjective, Objective. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2001 CrossRef | Google Scholar.
Day, William Google Scholar. “The Aesthetic Dimension of Wittgenstein's Later Writings.” Unpublished manuscript.
Day, William. “Knowing as Instancing: Jazz Improvisation and Moral Perfectionism.” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 58 (Spring 2000 CrossRef | Google Scholar): 99–111.
Dennett, Daniel C. “Can Machines Think?” In Brainchildren: Essays on Designing Minds, 3–29. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1998 Google Scholar.
Dennett, Daniel C.Consciousness Explained. Boston: Little, Brown, and Company, 1991 Google Scholar.
René, Descartes. Meditations on First Philosophy: In Which the Existence of God and the Distinction of the Soul from the Body Are Demonstrated. Translated by Cress, Donald A.. 3d ed. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1993 Google Scholar.
Diamond, Cora. “The Hardness of the Soft: Wittgenstein's Early Thought About Skepticism.” In Skepticism in Context, edited by Conant, James and Kern, Andrea. London Google Scholar: Routledge, forthcoming.
Diamond, Cora. The Realistic Spirit: Wittgenstein, Philosophy, and the Mind. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1991 Google Scholar.
Diamond, Cora “Rules: Looking in the Right Place.” In Wittgenstein: Attention to Particulars, edited by Phillips, D. Z. and Winch, Peter, 12–34. London: Macmillan, 1989 Google Scholar.
Dreyfus, Hubert L., and Hall, Harrison, eds. Husserl, Intentionality, and Cognitive Science. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1982 Google Scholar.
Drury, M. O'C. Google Scholar “Conversations with Wittgenstein.” In Rhees, Recollections of Wittgenstein, 97–171.
Drury, M. O'C. Google Scholar “Some Notes on Conversations with Wittgenstein.” In Rhees, Recollections of Wittgenstein, 76–96.
Drury, M. O'C.The Danger of Words and Writings on Wittgenstein. Bristol: Thoemmes Press, 1996 Google Scholar.
Eldridge, Richard. Leading a Human Life: Wittgenstein, Intentionality, and Romanticism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1997 Google Scholar.
Ellmann, Richard. Four Dubliners: Wilde, Yeats, Joyce, and Beckett. London: Hamish Hamilton, 1987 Google Scholar.
Emerson, Ralph Waldo. “Society and Solitude.” In Emerson's Complete Works, 7: 9–20. 12 vols. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1883 Google Scholar.
Engelmann, Paul. Letters from Ludwig Wittgenstein: With a Memoir. Oxford: Blackwell, 1967 Google Scholar.
Floyd, Juliet. “Critical Study of Mathieu Marion, Wittgenstein, Finitism, and the Philosophy of Mathematics.” Philosophia Mathematica 10, no. 1 (2002 CrossRef | Google Scholar): 67–88.
Floyd, Juliet. “Number and Ascriptions of Number in Wittgenstein's Tractatus.” In Future Pasts: Perspectives on the Analytic Tradition in Twentieth Century Philosophy, edited by Floyd, Juliet and Shieh, Sanford, 145–91. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001 CrossRef | Google Scholar.
Floyd, Juliet Google Scholar. “Wittgenstein and the Inexpressible.” In Crary, Wittgenstein and the Moral Life, 177–234.
Floyd, Juliet “Wittgenstein on Philosophy of Logic and Mathematics.” In The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Mathematics and Logic, edited by Shapiro, Stewart, 75–128. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005 Google Scholar.
Dagfinn, Føllesdaal. “Husserl's Notion of Noema.” Journal of Philosophy 66 (1969 Google Scholar): 680–87.
Dagfinn, Føllesdaal. “Ultimate Justification in Husserl and Wittgenstein.” In Experience and Analysis, edited by Reicher, Maria E. and Marek, Johann C., 127–42. Vienna: öbv & hpt, 2005 Google Scholar.
Fodor, Jerry A.The Language of Thought. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell, 1975 Google Scholar.
Frazer, James George. The Golden Bough. Abridged edition. London: Macmillan, 1967 Google Scholar.
Freadman, Richard. Threads of Life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2001 Google Scholar.
Frege, Gottlob. “On Sinn and Bedeutung.” In The Frege Reader, 151–71. Edited by Beaney, Michael. Oxford: Blackwell, 1997 Google Scholar.
Galavotti, M. C.Philosophical Introduction to Probability. Stanford: CSLI, 2005 Google Scholar.
Genova, Judith. Wittgenstein: A Way of Seeing. New York: Routledge, 1995 Google Scholar.
Gerrard, Steven. “Wittgenstein's Philosophies of Mathematics.” Synthese 87, no. 1 (1991 CrossRef | Google Scholar): 125–42.
Gibson, John, and Huemer, Wolfgang, eds. The Literary Wittgenstein. New York: Routledge, 2004 Google Scholar.
Glock, Hans-Johann, ed. Wittgenstein: A Critical Reader. Oxford: Blackwell, 2001 Google Scholar.
Glock, Hans-Johann, ed. A Wittgenstein Dictionary. Oxford: Blackwell, 1996 CrossRef | Google Scholar.
Goffman, Erving. “The Interaction Order.” American Sociological Review 48, no. 1 (February 1983 CrossRef | Google Scholar): 1–17.
Goffman, Erving. Stigma. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice Hall, 1963 Google Scholar.
Goldfarb, Warren. “I Want You to Bring Me a Slab: Remarks on the Opening Sections of the Philosophical Investigations.” Synthese 56 (1983 CrossRef | Google Scholar): 265–82.
Gould, Timothy. Hearing Things: Voice and Method in the Writing of Stanley Cavell. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998 Google Scholar.
Gowers, Timothy. Mathematics: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002 CrossRef | Google Scholar.
Hacker, P. M. S. “Developmental Hypotheses and Perspicuous Representations: Wittgenstein on Frazer's Golden Bough.” In Wittgenstein: Connections and Controversies, 74–97. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001 CrossRef | Google Scholar.
Hacker, P. M. S.Wittgenstein: Mind and Will. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996 Google Scholar.
Hagberg, Garry L.Art As Language: Wittgenstein, Meaning, and Aesthetic Theory. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1995 Google Scholar.
Hagberg, Garry L. Google Scholar “Autobiographical Consciousness: Wittgenstein, Private Experience, and the ‘Inner Picture’.” In Gibson and Huemer, The Literary Wittgenstein, 228–50.
Hagberg, Garry L.Davidson, Self-Knowledge, and Autobiographical Writing.” Philosophy and Literature 26:2 (October 2002 CrossRef | Google Scholar): 354–68.
Hagberg, Garry L.Meaning and Interpretation: Wittgenstein, Henry James, and Literary Knowledge. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1994 Google Scholar.
Hagberg, Garry L. “The Mind Shown: Wittgenstein, Goethe, and the Question of Person Perception.” In Goethe and Wittgenstein: Seeing the World's Unity in Its Variety, edited by Breithaupt, Fritz, Raatzsch, Richard, and Kremberg, Bettina, 111–26. Wittgenstein Studien, band 5. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 2002 Google Scholar.
Hagberg, Garry L.On Philosophy as Therapy: Wittgenstein, Cavell, and Autobiographical Writing.” Philosophy and Literature 27:1 (April 2003 CrossRef | Google Scholar): 196–210.
Hagberg, Garry L. “Rightness Reconsidered: Krausz, Wittgenstein, and the Question of Interpretive Understanding.” In Interpretation and Its Objects: Studies in the Philosophy of Michael Krausz, edited by Ritivoi, Andreea Deciu, 25–37. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 2003 Google Scholar.
Hagberg, Garry L. “The Self, Reflected: Wittgenstein, Cavell, and the Autobiographical Situation.” In Ordinary Language Criticism: Literary Thinking after Cavell after Wittgenstein, edited by Dauber, Kenneth and Jost, Walter, 171–98. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 2003 Google Scholar.
Hagberg, Garry L.The Self, Speaking: Wittgenstein, Introspective Utterances, and the Arts of Self-Representation.” Revue Internationale de Philosophie, no. 219 (2002 Google Scholar): 9–47.
Hagberg, Garry L. Google Scholar “The Self, Thinking: Wittgenstein, Augustine, and the Autobiographical Situation.” In Lewis, Wittgenstein, Aesthetics and Philosophy, 215–33.
Hagberg, Garry L. “Wittgenstein and the Question of True Self-Interpretation.” In Is There a Single Right Interpretation?, edited by Krausz, Michael, 381–406. University Park, Pa.: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2002 Google Scholar.
Hardy, G. H.Apology of a Mathematician. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990 Google Scholar.
Harré, Rom. Social Being. Oxford: Blackwell, 1979 Google Scholar.
Heidegger, Martin. Being and Time. Translated by Macquarrie, John and Robinson, Edward. New York: Harper & Row, 1962 Google Scholar.
Heidegger, MartinWhat is Called Thinking? Translated by Gray, J. Glenn. New York: Harper, 1968 Google Scholar.
Hintikka, Jaakko Google Scholar. “Reply to Marion.” In Auxier and Hahn, The Philosophy of Jaakko Hintikka, 431–36.
Huizinga, Johan. The Waning of The Middle Ages. London: Penguin, 1968 Google Scholar.
Husserl, Edmund. Logical Investigations. Vol. 1. Translated by Findlay, J. N.. London: Routledge, 1970 Google Scholar.
Jastrow, Joseph. Fact and Fable in Psychology. Boston and New York: Houghton Mifflin, 1900 CrossRef | Google Scholar.
Johnson, Samuel. The History of Rasselas, Prince of Abissinia (1759). London: Penguin, 1976 Google Scholar.
Johnston, Paul. Wittgenstein: Rethinking the Inner. London: Routledge, 1993 CrossRef | Google Scholar.
Joyce, James. “Araby.” In Dubliners. New York: Penguin, 1976 Google Scholar.
Kandinski, Wassily. Concerning the Spiritual in Art and Painting in Particular. New York: George Wittenborn, 1912 Google Scholar.
Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Pure Reason. Translated by Smith, Norman Kemp. London: Macmillan, 1929 Google Scholar.
Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Judgment. Translated by Bernard, J. H.. New York: Hafner Press, 1951 Google Scholar.
Kienzler, Wolfgang. Wittgensteins wende zu seiner Spätphilosophie 1930–1932. Frankfurt am Main: Surhkamp Verlag, 1997 Google Scholar.
Klagge, James C., ed. Wittgenstein: Biography and Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001 CrossRef | Google Scholar.
Krebs, Victor J.Against Idolatry and Toward Psychology: A Review of Ray Monk's Ludwig Wittgenstein: The Duty of Genius.” The San Francisco Jung Institute Library Journal 12, no. 3 (1993 CrossRef | Google Scholar): 21–39.
Krebs, Victor J.Del alma y el arte: Reflexiones en torno a la cultura, la imagen y la memoria. Caracas: Editorial Arte, 1997 Google Scholar.
Krebs, Victor J. “‘Around the Axis of our Real Need’: On the Ethical Point of Wittgenstein's Philosophy.” European Journal of Philosophy 9, no. 3 (December 2001 CrossRef | Google Scholar): 344–74.
Krebs, Victor J. “‘Descending into Primaeval Chaos’: Philosophy, the Body, and the Pygmalionic Impulse.” In Mythos and Logos: How to Regain the Love of Wisdom, edited by Anderson, Albert A., Hicks, Steven V., and Witowski, Lech, 141–60. Amsterdam and New York: Rodopi, 2004 Google Scholar.
Krebs, Victor J.The Subtle Body of Language and the Lost Sense of Philosophy.” Philosophical Investigations 23, no. 2 (April 2000 CrossRef | Google Scholar): 147–55.
Kripke, Saul. Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language: An Elementary Exposition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1982 Google Scholar.
Kuhn, Thomas S.The Road Since Structure: Philosophical Essays, 1970 – 1993, with an Autobiographical Interview. Edited by Conant, James and Haugeland, John. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000 Google Scholar.
Lessing, Gotthold Ephraim. Laocoön: An Essay on the Limits of Painting and Poetry. Translated by McCormick, Edward Allen. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1962 Google Scholar, 1984.
Lewis, C. S.A Grief Observed. London: Faber and Faber, 1961 Google Scholar.
Lewis, Peter B., ed. Wittgenstein, Aesthetics and Philosophy. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2004 Google Scholar.
Lyotard, Jean-François. The Differend: Phrases in Dispute. Translated by Abbeele, Georges. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1988 Google Scholar.
Margalit, Avishai. “Sense and Sensibility: Wittgenstein on the ‘Golden Bough’.” Iyyun: The Jerusalem Philosophical Quarterly 41 (1992 Google Scholar): 301–18.
Marion, Mathieu Google Scholar. “Phenomenological Language: Thoughts and Operations in the Tractatus.” In Auxier and Hahn, The Philosophy of Jaakko Hintikka, 413–31.
McDowell, John. Mind and World. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1994 Google Scholar.
McGinn, Colin. “Can We Solve the Mind-Body Problem?Mind 98 (July 1989 CrossRef | Google Scholar): 349–66.
McGinn, Marie. Wittgenstein and the Philosophical Investigations. London: Routledge, 1997 Google Scholar.
McGuinness, Brian. Approaches to Wittgenstein: Collected Papers. London: Routledge, 2002 CrossRef | Google Scholar.
McGuinness, Brian Google Scholar. “ ‘The Lion Speaks, and We Don't Understand’: Wittgenstein after 100 Years.” In McGuinness, Approaches to Wittgenstein, 3–9.
McGuinness, Brian Google Scholar. “Probability.” In McGuinness, Approaches to Wittgenstein, 201–14.
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. Phenomenology of Perception. New York: Routledge, 1999 Google Scholar.
Minar, Edward. “Feeling at Home in Language (What Makes Reading Philosophical Investigations Possible?).” Synthese 102 (March 1995 CrossRef | Google Scholar): 413–52.
Monk, Ray. Ludwig Wittgenstein: The Duty of Genius. New York: Free Press, 1990 Google Scholar.
Moran, Richard. Authority and Estrangement: An Essay on Self-Knowledge. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2001 Google Scholar.
Moyal-Sharrock, Danièle, ed. The Third Wittgenstein: The Post-Investigations Works. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2004 Google Scholar.
Mühlholzer, Felix. “Wittgenstein and Surprises in Mathematics.” In Wittgenstein und die Zukunft der Philosophie: Eine Neubewertung nach 50 Jahren. Proceedings of the 24th International Wittgenstein Symposium. Vienna: öbv & hpt, 2002 Google Scholar.
Mulhall, Stephen. Inheritance and Originality. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2001 Google Scholar.
Mulhall, Stephen. On Being in the World: Wittgenstein and Heidegger on Seeing Aspects. London: Routledge, 1990 Google Scholar.
Mulhall, Stephen Google Scholar. “Seeing Aspects.” In Glock, Wittgenstein: A Critical Reader, 246–67.
Nabokov, Vladimir. Speak, Memory: An Autobiography Revisited. New York: Vintage, 1989 Google Scholar. Originally published as Conclusive Evidence. New York: Harper, 1951.
Nagel, Thomas. “What Is It Like to Be a Bat?Philosophical Review 83 (October 1974 CrossRef | Google Scholar): 435–50.
Narboux, Jean-Philippe. “Diagramme, Dimensions et Synopsis.” In Théorie, Littérature, Enseignement 22. Saint-Denis: Presses Universitaires de Vincennes, 2005 Google Scholar: 115–41.
Narboux, Jean-Philippe. Dimensions et Paradigms, Wittgenstein et le problème de l'abstraction. Paris Google Scholar: Vrin Mathesis, forthcoming.
Nietzsche, Friedrich. “On Truth and Lying in a Non-Moral Sense.” In The Birth of Tragedy and Other Writings, 139–53. Edited by Geuss, Raymond and Speirs, Ronald. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999 Google Scholar.
Ogden, C. K. and Richards, I. A.. The Meaning of Meaning. San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1989 Google Scholar.
Orwell, George. “Inside the Whale.” In A Collection of Essays, 210–52. New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 1970 Google Scholar.
Pascal, Blaise. Pensées. Œuvres complètes. Edited by Chevalier, Jacques. Paris: Gallimard, 1954 Google Scholar.
Pascal, Fania Google Scholar. “Wittgenstein: A Personal Memoir.” In Rhees, Recollections of Wittgenstein, 12–49.
Peirce, Charles Sanders. “On the Doctrine of Chances, With Later Reflections.” In Philosophical Writings of Peirce, 157–73. Edited by Buchler, Justus. New York: Dover, 1955 Google Scholar.
Peirce, Charles Sanders. “Philosophy and the Conduct of Life.” In Reasoning and the Logic of Things, 105–22. Edited by Ketner, Kenneth Laine. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1992 Google Scholar.
Pippin, Robert B.Idealism as Modernism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997 CrossRef | Google Scholar.
Putnam, Hilary Google Scholar. “Sense, Nonsense, and the Senses: An Inquiry into the Powers of the Human Mind.” In Putnam, The Threefold Cord, 3–70.
Putnam, Hilary. The Threefold Cord: Mind, Body, and World. New York: Columbia University Press, 1999 Google Scholar.
Quine, W. V. “Five Milestones of Empiricism.” In Theories and Things, 67–72. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1981 Google Scholar.
Rhees, Rush. “Introduction to ‘Remarks on Frazer's Golden Bough’.” The Human World 3 (May 1971 Google Scholar): 28–41.
Rhees, Rush Google Scholar “Postscript.” In Rhees, ed. Recollections of Wittgenstein, 172–209.
Rhees, Rush Google Scholar “ ‘Seeing’ and ‘Thinking’.” In Rhees, Wittgenstein's On Certainty, 16–26.
Rhees, RushWittgenstein and the Possibility of Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998 Google Scholar.
Rhees, Rush “Wittgenstein's Builders.” In Discussions of Wittgenstein, 71–84. Bristol: Thoemmes Press, 1970 Google Scholar.
Rhees, RushWittgenstein's On Certainty: There – Like Our Life. Edited by Phillips, D. Z.. Oxford: Blackwell, 2003 CrossRef | Google Scholar.
Rhees, Rush ed. Recollections of Wittgenstein. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984 Google Scholar.
Rorty, Richard. Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989 CrossRef | Google Scholar.
Rhees, RushPhilosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1979 Google Scholar.
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. “On the Origin of Languages.” In Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Johann Gottfried Herder: On the Origin of Language, 5–83. Translated by Moran, John H. and Gode, Alexander. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1966 Google Scholar.
Sass, Louis A.The Paradoxes of Delusion: Wittgenstein, Schreber, and the Schizophrenic Mind. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1994 Google Scholar.
Schulte, Joachim. Experience and Expression: Wittgenstein's Philosophy of Psychology. Translated by Schulte, Joachim. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993 Google Scholar.
Simmel, Georg. “The Nature of Philosophy.” In Georg Simmel et al., Essays on Sociology, Philosophy and Aesthetics, 283–308. Edited by Wolff, Kurt H.. New York: Harper Torchbooks, 1965 Google Scholar.
Smart, J. J. C. “Materialism.” Essays Metaphysical and Moral: Selected Philosophical Papers, 203–14. Oxford: Blackwell, 1987 Google Scholar.
Smith, Adam. “The History of Astronomy.” In Essays Philosophical and Literary, 342–85. London: Ward, Lock & Co., 1880 Google Scholar.
Stendhal. The Charterhouse of Parma. Harmondsworth, U.K.: Penguin, 1958 Google Scholar.
Stern, David G.Wittgenstein on Mind and Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995 CrossRef | Google Scholar.
Stern, David G.Wittgenstein's Philosophical Investigations: An Introduction. Cambridge Introductions to Key Philosophical Texts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004 CrossRef | Google Scholar.
Strawson, P. F.The Bounds of Sense: An Essay on Kant's Critique of Pure Reason. London: Methuen, 1966 Google Scholar.
Strodtbeck, Fred L.Review of Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior, by Erving Goffman.” The American Journal of Sociology 76, no. 1 (1970 CrossRef | Google Scholar): 177–79.
Tolstoy, Leo. War and Peace. Translated by Edmonds, Rosemary. London: Penguin, 1982 Google Scholar.
Tomasello, Michael. The Cultural Origins of Human Cognition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1999 Google Scholar.
Travis, Charles. “Taking Thought.” Mind 109 (2000 CrossRef | Google Scholar): 533–57.
Webb, Judson C. Google Scholar “Hintikka on Aristotelian Constructions, Kantian Intuitions, and Peircean Theorems.” In Auxier and Hahn, The Philosophy of Jaakko Hintikka, 195–302.
Whitehead, Alfred North. An Introduction to Mathematics. New York: H. Holt, 1911 Google Scholar.
Winch, Peter. Simone Weil: “The Just Balance.”Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989 CrossRef | Google Scholar.
Wisdom, John. “Ludwig Wittgenstein 1934–1937.” In Paradox and Discovery, 87–9. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1965 Google Scholar.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. The Big Typescript: TS 213. Edited and translated by Luckhardt, C. Grant and Aue, Maximilian A. E.. Oxford: Blackwell, 2005 CrossRef | Google Scholar.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. The Blue and Brown Books. New York: Harper, 1958 Google Scholar.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Briefwechsel: Mit B. Russell, G. E. Moore, J. M. Keynes, F. P. Ramsey, W. Eccles, P. Engelmann und L. von Ficker. Edited by Seekircher, Monika, McGuinness, Brian, Unterkircher, Anton, Janik, Allan and Methlagl, Walter. CD-ROM. Innsbrucker elektronische Ausgabe, 2004 Google Scholar.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. The Collected Manuscripts of Ludwig Wittgenstein on Facsimile CD-ROM. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000 Google Scholar.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Culture and Value. Edited by Wright, G. H.. Translated by Winch, Peter. Oxford: Blackwell, 1980 Google Scholar.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Culture and Value: Revised Edition. Edited by Wright, G. H.. Revised edition of the text by Pichler, Alois. Translated by Winch, Peter. Oxford: Blackwell, 1998 Google Scholar.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Denkbewegungen: Tagebücher 1930–1932, 1936–1937. Edited by Somavilla, Ilse. Innsbruck, Austria: Haymon Verlag, 1997 Google Scholar.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Last Writings on the Philosophy of Psychology. Vol. 1, Preliminary Studies for Part II of Philosophical Investigations. Edited by Wright, G. H. and Nyman, Heikki. Translated by Luckhardt, C. G. and Aue, Maximilian A. E.. Oxford: Blackwell, 1982 Google Scholar.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Last Writings on the Philosophy of Psychology. Vol. 2, The Inner and the Outer, 1949–1951. Edited by Wright, G. H. and Nyman, Heikki. Translated by Luckhardt, C. G. and Aue, Maximilian A. E.. Oxford: Blackwell, 1992 Google Scholar.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Lectures and Conversations on Aesthetics, Psychology and Religious Belief. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1972 Google Scholar.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Notebooks 1914–1916. Edited by Wright, G. H. and Anscombe, G. E. M.. Translated by Anscombe, G. E. M.. 2d ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1979 Google Scholar.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. On Certainty. Edited by Anscombe, G. E. M. and Wright, G. H.. Translated by Paul, Denis and Anscombe, G. E. M.. New York: Harper, 1969 Google Scholar.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Philosophical Grammar. Edited by Rhees, Rush. Translated by Kenny, Anthony. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1974 Google Scholar.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Philosophical Investigations. Edited by Anscombe, G. E. M. and Rhees, Rush. Translated by Anscombe, G. E. M.. 2d ed. Oxford: Blackwell, 1958 Google Scholar.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Philosophical Investigations. Edited by Anscombe, G. E. M. and Rhees, Rush. Revised English translation by Anscombe, G. E. M.. 3d ed. Oxford: Blackwell, 2001 Google Scholar.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Philosophical Investigations. Edited by Hacker, P. M. S. and Schulte, Joachim. Translated by Anscombe, G. E. M., Hacker, P. M. S., and Schulte, Joachim. Rev. 4th ed. Oxford: Blackwell, 2009 Google Scholar.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Philosophical Occasions: 1912–1951. Edited by Klagge, James and Nordmann, Alfred. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1993 Google Scholar.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Philosophical Remarks. Edited by Rhees, Rush. Translated by Hargreaves, Raymond and White, Roger. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1975 Google Scholar.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Remarks on Colour. Edited by Anscombe, G. E. M.. Translated by McAlister, Linda L. and Schättle, Margarete. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1978 Google Scholar.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Remarks on the Foundations of Mathematics. Edited by Wright, G. H., Rhees, R., and Anscombe, G. E. M.. Translated by Anscombe, G. E. M.. Revised ed. Oxford: Blackwell, 1978 Google Scholar.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Remarks on the Philosophy of Psychology. Vol. 1. Edited by Anscombe, G. E. M. and Wright, G. H.. Translated by Anscombe, G. E. M.. Oxford: Blackwell, 1980 Google Scholar.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Remarks on the Philosophy of Psychology. Vol. 2. Edited by Wright, G. H. and Nyman, Heikki. Translated by Luckhardt, C. G. and Aue, M. A. E.. Oxford: Blackwell, 1980 Google Scholar.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Translated by Pears, D. F. and McGuinness, B. F.. Atlantic Highlands, N.J.: Humanities Press, 1961 Google Scholar.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Wittgenstein and the Vienna Circle: Conversations Recorded by Friedrich Waismann. Edited by McGuinness, Brian. Translated by Schulte, Joachim and McGuinness, Brian. Oxford: Blackwell, 1979 Google Scholar.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Wittgenstein's Lectures, Cambridge, 1930–1932: From the Notes of John King and Desmond Lee. Edited by Lee, Desmond. Oxford: Blackwell, 1980 Google Scholar.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Wittgenstein's Lectures, Cambridge, 1932–1935: From the Notes of Alice Ambrose and Margaret Macdonald. Edited by Ambrose, Alice. Oxford: Blackwell, 1979 Google Scholar.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Wittgenstein's Lectures on the Foundations of Mathematics, Cambridge, 1939. Edited by Diamond, Cora. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1976 Google Scholar; Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1989.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Zettel. Edited by Anscombe, G. E. M. and Wright, G. H.. Translated by Anscombe, G. E. M.. Oxford: Blackwell, 1967 Google Scholar.
Wollheim, Richard. Art and Its Objects: An Introduction to Aesthetics. New York: Harper & Row, 1968 Google Scholar.
Wollheim, Richard. On Formalism and its Kinds. Barcelona: Fundació Antoni Tàpies, 1995 Google Scholar.
Wollheim, RichardPainting as an Art. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1987 Google Scholar.
Wollheim, RichardThe Thread of Life. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1984 Google Scholar.
Wright, G. H. von.The Troubled History of Part II of the Investigations.” Grazer Philosophische Studien 42 (1992 CrossRef | Google Scholar): 181–92.
Wright, G. H. von.Wittgenstein. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1983 Google Scholar.

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

24 readers on Mendeley

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.