Abers, G.A., 1998. Array measurements of phases used in receiver-function calculations: importance of scattering, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 88, 313–318.Google Scholar

Abrahamson, N.A. & Bolt, B.A., 1987. Array analysis and synthesis mapping of strong seismic motion, in Seismic Strong Ground Motion Synthesis, ed. B.A. Bolt, Academic Press, Orlando.Google Scholar

Adams, R.D., Hughes, A.A., & McGregor, D.M., 1982. Analysis procedures at the International Seismological Centre, Phys. Earth. Planet. Inter., 30, 85–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Akaike, H., 1973. Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle, in 2nd International Symposium on Information Theory, 267–281, eds. B., Petrov & F., Csaki (Eds.), Budapest Akademiai Kiado.

Aki, K., 1960. Study of earthquake mechanism by a method of phase equilisation applied to Rayleigh and Love waves, J. Geophys. Res., 65, 729–740.Google Scholar

Aki, K., & Richards, P.G., 1980. Quantitative Seismology, W.H. Freeman, San Franciso.Google Scholar

Ammon, C.J., 1991. The isolation of receiver effects from teleseismic P waveforms, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 81, 2504–2510.Google Scholar

Ammon, C.J., Randall, G.E. & Zandt, G., 1990. On the nonuniqueness of receiver function inversions, J. Geophys. Res., 95, 15303–15.318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ammon, C.J., & Zandt, G., 1993. Receiver structure beneath the southern Mojave Block, California, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 83, 737–755.Google Scholar

Ando, M., 1984. ScS polarisation anisotropy around the Pacific Ocean, J. Phys. Earth, 32, 179–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ansell, J.H. & Gubbins, D., 1986. Anomalous high frequency wave propagation from the Tonga-Kermadec seismic zone to New Zealand, Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc., 85, 93–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Astiz, L., Earle, P. & Shearer, P., 1996. Global stacking of broadband seismograms, Seism. Res. Lett., 67, 8–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Babuška, V. & Cara, M., 1991. Seismic Anisotropy in the Earth, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Babuška, V., Plomerova, J. & Šilený, J., 1993. Models of seismic anisotropy in the deep continental lithosphere, Phys. Earth. Planet. Inter., 78 167–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bai, C.-Y., & Kennett, B.L.N., 2000. Automatic phase-detection and identification by full use of a single three-component broadband seismogram, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 90, 187–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bai, C.-Y., & Kennett, B.L.N., 2001. Phase identification and attribute analysis of broadband seismograms at far-regional distances, J. Seismol., 5, 217–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bamford, S.A.D., 1973. Refraction data in Western Germany - a time term interpretation, Z. Geophys., 39, 907–923.Google Scholar

Barley, B.J., Hudson, J.A. & Douglas, A., 1982. S to P scattering at the 650 km discontinuity, Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc., 49, 159–172.Google Scholar

Barruol, G., Silver, P.G., Vauchez, A., 1997. Seismic anisotropy in the eastern United States: Deep structure of a complex continental plate, J. Geophys. Res., 102, 8329–8348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barruol, G., Helffrich, G. & Vauchez, A., 1997. Shear wave splitting around the Northern Atlantic: frozen Pangaean lithospheric anisotropy, Tectonophys., 279, 135–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bataille, K., Wu, R.-S. & Flattè, S.M., 1990. Inhomogeneities near the core-mantle boundary evidenced from scattered waves: a review, Pure Appl. Geophys., 132, 151–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baumont, D., Paul, A., Beck, S. & Zandt, G., 1999. Strong crustal heterogeneity in the Bolivian Altiplano suggested by attenuation of Lg waves, J. Geophys. Res., 104, 20287–20.305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beckers, J., Schwartz, S.Y. & Lay, T., 1994. The velocity structure of the crust and upper mantle under China from broad-band P and PP waveform analysis, Geophys. J. Int., 119, 574–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Benndorf, H., 1912. Besprechungen: A. Mohorovičić, Das Beben von 8.X.1909, Gerlands Beitr¨age Geophys., 11(2), 348–502.Google Scholar

Benz, H. & Vidale, J.E., 1993. The sharpness of upper mantle discontinuities determined from high frequency P'P', Nature, 365, 147–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beroza, G.C., 1991. Near source modeling of the Loma Prieta earthquake: evidence for heterogeneous slip and implications for earthquake hazard, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 81, 1603–1621.Google Scholar

Bhattacharya, J., Shearer, P. & Masters, G., 1993. Inner core attenuation from short-period PKP(BC) versus PKP(DF) waveforms, Geophys. J. Int., 114, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bhattacharyya, J., Masters, G. & Shearer, P., 1996. Global lateral variations of shear wave attenuation in the upper mantle, J. Geophys. Res., 101, 22273–22. 289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bijwaard, H. & Spakman, W., 2000. Non-linear global P-wave tomography by iterated linearized inversion, Geophys. J. Int., 141, 71–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bijwaard, H., Spakman, W. & Engdahl, E.R., 1998. Closing the gap between regional and global travel time tomography, J. Geophys. Res., 103, 30055–30.078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Billings, S., 1994. Simulated annealing for earthquake location Geophys. J. Int., 118, 680–692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Billings, S., Kennett, B.L.N., & Sambridge, M.S., 1994. Hypocentre location: genetic algorithms incorporating problem-specific information, Geophys. J. Int., 118, 693–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Billings, S., Sambridge, M.S., & Kennett, B.L.N., 1994. Errors in hypocentre location: picking, model and magnitude dependence, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 84, 1978–1990.Google Scholar

Bina, C.R. & Silver, P.G., 1990. Constraints on lower mantle composition and temperature from density and bulk-sound speed profiles, Geophys. Res. Lett., 17, 1153–1156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blandford, R.R., 1980. Seismic discrimination problems at regional distances, 695–740. in Identification of Seismic Sources - Earthquake or Underground Explosion, eds. Husebye, E.S. & Mykkeltveit, S., Riedel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar

Bock, G., 1988. Sp phases from the Australian upper mantle, Geophys. J., 94, 73–81.

Bock, G., 1994. Synthetic seismogram images of upper mantle structure: No evidence for a 520-km discontinuity, J. Geophys. Res., 99, 15843–15.851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bock, G. & Ha, J., 1984. Short period S–P conversion in the mantle at a depth near 700 km, Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc., 77, 593–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bock, G. & SVEKALAPKO Working Group, 2001. Seismic probing of Fennoscandian lithosphere, EOS Trans. Am. Geophys. Union, 82, 621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bolton, H., 1996. Long period travel times and the structure of the mantle, Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of California, San Diego.Google Scholar

Bolton, H. & Masters, G., 1994. Scaling S to P in the mantle: does it work? EOS Trans. Am. Geophys. Union, 75, Fall Meeting Suppl., 476.Google Scholar

Bolton, H. & Masters, G., 2001. Travel times of P and S from the global digital seismic networks: Implications for the relative variation of P and S velocity in the mantle, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 13527–13.540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boschi, L. & Dzeiwonski, A.M., 2000. Whole earth tomography from delay times of P, PcP, and PKP phases: Lateral heterogeneities in the outer core or radial anisotropy in the mantle, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 13675–13696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bostock, M.G., 1998. Mantle stratigraphy and evolution of the Slave province, J. Geophys. Res., 103, 21183–21.200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bostock, M.G. & Kennett, B.L.N., 1990. The effect of 3-D structure on Lg propagation patterns, Geophys. J. Int., 101, 355–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bostock, M.G. & Kennett, B.L.N., 1992. Multiple scattering of surface waves from surface obstacles, Geophys. J. Int., 108, 52–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bostock, M.G. & Rondenay, S., 1999. Migration of scattered teleseismic body waves, Geophys. J. Int., 137, 732–746.

Bostock, M.G., Rondenay, S. & Shragge, J. 2002. Multiparameter two-dimensional inversion of scattered teleseismic body waves: 1 - Theory for oblique incidence. J. Geophys. Res., 106, 30 771–30 782.Google Scholar

Bostrom, A. & Karlsson, K., 1984. Exact synthetic seismograms for an inhomogeneity in a layered half space, Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc., 79, 835–862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bouchon, M. & Aki, K., 1980. Simulation of long-period, near-field motion for the great California earthquake of 1857, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 70, 1669–1682.Google Scholar

Bour, M. & Cara, M., 1997. Test of a simple empirical Green's function method on moderate sized earthquakes, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 87, 668–683.Google Scholar

Bowman, J. R., 1992. The 1998 Tennant Creek, Northern Territory, earthquakes: a synthesis, Aust. J. Earth Sci., 39, 651–669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bowman, J. R. & Ando, M., 1987. Shear-wave splitting in the upper mantle wedge above the Tonga subduction zone, Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc., 88, 25–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bowman, J. R. & Kennett, B.L.N., 1990. An investigation of the upper mantle beneath northwestern Australia using a hybrid seismograph array, Geophys. J. Int., 101, 411–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bowman, J. R. & Kennett, B.L.N., 1991. Propagation of Lg waves in the North Australian craton: influence of crustal velocity gradients, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 81, 592–610.Google Scholar

Bowman, J. R. & Kennett, B.L.N., 1993. The velocity structure of the Australian Shield from seismic travel times, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 83, 25–37.Google Scholar

Bowman, J. R., Gibson, T. & Jones, T., 1990. Aftershocks of the 11 January 1988 Tennant Creek, Australia intraplate earthquakes: evidence for a complex thrust fault geometry, Geophys. J. Int., 100, 87–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bratt, S.R. & Bache, T.C., 1988. Locating events with a sparse network of regional arrays, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 78, 780–798.Google Scholar

Brèger, L., Romanowicz, B. & Tkalčić, H., 1999. PKP (BC-DF) travel time residuals and short scale heterogeneity in the deep earth, Geophys. Res. Lett., 26, 3169–3172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buffet, B.A., 1998. Free oscillations in the length of the day: Inferences on physical processes near the core-mantle boundary, in The Core-Mantle Boundary Region, eds. M., Gurnis, M.E., Wysession, E., Knittle & B.A., Buffet, Geodynamics Monograph, 28, American Geophysical Union.Google Scholar

Buland, R., 1976. The mechanics of locating earthquakes, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 66, 173–187.Google Scholar

Buland, R., & Chapman, C.H., 1983. The computation of seismic travel times, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 73, 1271–1302.Google Scholar

Buland, R., & Gibert, F., 1976. Matched filtering for the seismic moment tensor, Geophys. Res. Lett., 3, 205–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bungum, H., Husebye, E.S. & Ringdal, F., 1971. The NORSAR array and preliminary results of data analysis, Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc., 25, 115–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burdick, L.J. & Helmberger, D.V., 1978. The upper mantle P wave structure of the western United States, J. Geophys. Res., 83, 1699–1712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Calcagnile, G., Panza, G. F., Schwab, F., & Kausel, E. G., 1976. On the computation of theoretical seismograms for multimode surface waves, Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc., 47, 73–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Calvert, A., Sandvoil, E., Seber, D., Barazangi, M., Vidal, F., Alguacil, G. & Jabour, N., 2000. Propagation of regional seismic phases (Lg and Sn) and Pn velocity structure along the Africa-Iberia plate boundary zone: tectonic implications, Geophys. J. Int., 142, 384–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Campillo, M., 1987. Lg wave propagation in a laterally varying crust and the distribution of the apparent quality factor in central France, J. Geophys. Res., 92, 12604–12.614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Campillo, M., 1990. Propagation and attenuation characteristics of the crustal phase Lg, Pure Applied Geophys., 132, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Campillo, M., Bouchon, M. & Massinon, B., 1984. Theoretical study of the excitation, spectral characteristics and geometrical attenuation of regional seismic phases, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 74, 79–90.Google Scholar

Campillo, M., Feignier, B., Bouchon, M. & Bethoux, N., 1993. Attenuation of crustal waves across the Alpine range, J. Geophys. Res., 98, 1987–1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cao, S. & Muirhead, K.J., 1993. Finite difference modelling of Lg blockage, Geophys. J. Int., 116, 85–96.Google Scholar

Castle, J.C. & Creager, K.C., 1999. A steeply dipping discontinuity in the lower mantle beneath Izu-Bonin, J. Geophys. Res., 104, 7279–7292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cara, M., 1978. Regional variations of higher Rayleigh-mode phase velocities: A spatial filtering method, Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc., 54, 1875–1888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cara, M. & Lèvêque, J.J., 1987. Waveform inversion using secondary observables, Geophys. Res. Lett., 14, 1046–1049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cassell, B.R., Mykkeltveit, S., Kanestrom, R. & Husebye, E.S., 1983. A North-Sea – Southern Norway seismic crustal profile, Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc., 72, 733–753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Castle, J.C. & Creager, K.C., 2000. Local sharpness and shear wave speed jump across the 660-km discontinuity, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 6191–6200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Červeny, V., 2001. Seismic Ray Theory, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Chaljub, E., 2000. Modèlisation numèrique de la propagation d'ondes sismiques en gèomètrie sphèrique: application à la sismologie globale, Ph.D. Thesis, Universitè Paris VII Denis Diderot, France.Google Scholar

Chazalon, A., Campillo, M., Gibson, R. & Garnero, E., 1993. Crustal wave propagation anomaly across the Pyrennean range – comparison between observations and numerical simulations, Geophys. J. Int., 115, 829–838.

Choy, G.L., 1977. Theoretical seismograms of core phases calculated by a frequencydependent full wave theory, and their interpretation, Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc., 51, 275–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Choy, G.L. & Richards, P.G., 1975. Pulse distortion and Hilbert transformation in multiply reflected and refracted body waves, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 65, 55–70.Google Scholar

Chinn, D., Isacks, B. & Barazangi, M., 1980. High-frequency wave propagation in western South America along the continental margin, in the Nazca plate, and across the Altiplano, Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc., 60, 209–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clayton, R.W. & Wiggins, R.A., 1976. Source shape estimation and deconvolution of teleseismic body waves, Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc., 47, 151–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clèvède, E., Mègnin, C., Romanowicz, B. & Lognonnè, P., 2000. Seismic waveform modelling and surface wave tomography in a three-dimensional Earth: asymptotic and non-asymptotic approaches, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 119, 37–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Citheroe, G. & van der Hilst, R.D., 1998. Complex anisotropy in the Australian lithosphere for shear-wave splitting in briad-band SKS records, in Structure and Evolution of the Australian Continent, eds. J., Braun, J., Dooley, B., Goleby, R. van der, Hilst & C., Klootwijk, AGU Geodynamics Monographs, 26, 73–78.Google Scholar

Clouser & Langston, 1995. Modelling P-Rg conversions form isolated topographic features near the NORESS array, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 85, 859–873.

Clowes, R.M., Gens-Lenartowicz, E., Demartin, M. & Saxov, S., 1987. Lithospheric structure in southern Sweden - results from FENNOLORA, Tectonophys., 142, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Christofferson, A.E., Husebye, E.S. & Ingate, S., 1988. Wave field decomposition using ML-probabilities in modelling single site 3-component records, Geophys. J., 93, 197–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cleary, J. R. & Haddon, R.A.W., 1972. Seismic wave scattering near the core-mantle boundary: A new interpretation of precursors to PKIKP, Nature, 240, 549–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cleary, J.R., King, D.W. & Haddon, R.A.W., 1976. Seismic wave scattering in the earth's crust and upper mantle, Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc., 43, 861–872.Google Scholar

Coates, R.T. & Chapman, C.H., 1990. Quasi-shear wave coupling in weakly anisotropic 3-D media, Geophys. J. Int., 103, 301–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cormier, V. & Richards, P.G., 1977. Full wave theory applied to a discontinuous velocity increase: The inner core boundary, J. Geophys., 43, 3–31.Google Scholar

Crampin, S.C., 1975. Distinctive particle motion of surface waves as a diagnostic of anisotropic layering, Geophys. J. R. Ast. Soc., 40, 177–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crampin, S.C., Stephen, R. & McGonigle, R., 1982. The polarization of P-waves in anistropic media, Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc., 68, 477–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Creager, K.C., 1992. Anisotropy of the inner core from differential times of the phases PKP and PKIKP, Nature, 356, 309–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Creager, K.C., 1999. Large scale variation in inner core anisotropy, J. Geophys. Res., 104, 23 127–23 139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Creager, K.C., 2000. Inner core anisotropy and rotation, in Earth's Deep Interior: Mineral Physics and Tomography from Atomic to the Global Scale, eds. S.I., Karato, A.M., Forte, R.C., Liebermann, G., Masters & L., Stixrude, AGU Geophysical Monograph, 117, 89–114.Google Scholar

Creager, K.C. & Jordan, T.H., 1984. Slab penetration into the lower mantle, J. Geophys. Res., 89, 3031–3049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Creager, K.C. & Jordan, T.H., 1986. Aspherical structure of the core-mantle boundary from PKP travel times, Geophys. Res. Lett., 13, 1497–1500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cummins, P.R., 1997. Earthquake near field and W phase observations at teleseismic distance, Geophys. Res. Lett., 24, 2857–2860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cummins, P. & Johnson, L.R., 1988. Short-period body wave constraints of properties of the Earth's inner core boundary, J. Geophys. Res., 93, 9058–9074.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cummins, P.R., Takeuchi, N. & Geller, R.J., 1997 Computation of complete synthetic seismograms for laterally heterogeneous models using the Direct Solution Method, Geophys. J. Int., 130, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cummins, P.R., Kennett, B.L.N. Bowman, J.R. & Bostock, M.G., 1992. The 520 km discontinuity? Bull. Seism. Soc. Am, 82, 323–336.Google Scholar

Dahlen, F.A., Hung, S.-H. & Nolet, G., 2000. Frèchet kernels for finite frequency traveltimes - I. Theory, Geophys. J. Int., 141, 157–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davies, G.F. & Richards, M.A., 1992, Mantle convection, J. Geology, 100, 151–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Debayle, E., 1996. Tomographie du manteau supèrieur de l'Ocèan Indien par inversion de forme d'ondes, Ph.D. thesis, 170 pp., Univ. Louis Pasteur, Strasbourg, France.Google Scholar

Debayle, E., 1998. SV-wave azimuthal anisotropy in the Australian upper mantle: preliminary results from automated Rayleigh waveform inversion, Geophys. J. Int., 137, 747–751.Google Scholar

Debayle, E. & Kennett, B.L.N., 2000a. The Australian continental upper mantle - structure and deformation inferred from surface waves, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 25343–25.540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Debayle, E. & Kennett, B.L.N., 2000b. Anisotropy in the Australian upper mantle from Love and Rayleigh wave inversion, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 184, 339–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Deuss, A., Woodhouse, J.H., Paulssen, H. & Trampert, J., 2000. The observation of inner core shear waves, Geophys. J. Int., 142, 67–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dey, S.C., Kennett, B.L.N., Bowman, J.R. & Goody, A., 1993. Variations in upper mantle structure under northern Australia, Geophys. J. Int., 114, 304–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Doornbos, D.J., 1974. Seismic wave scattering near caustics: observation of PKKP precursors, Nature, 274, 352–353.Google Scholar

Doornbos, D.J., 1976. Characteristics of lower mantle heterogeneities from scattered waves, Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc., 44, 447–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Doornbos, D.J., 1978. On seismic-wave scattering by a rough core-mantle boundary, Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc., 53, 643–662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Doornbos, D.J., 1980. The effect of a rough core-mantle boundary on PKKP, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 21, 351–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Doornbos, D.J., 1988a. Multiple scattering by topographic relief with application to the core-mantle boundary, Geophys. J. Int. 92, 465–478.Google Scholar

Doornbos, D.J., 1988b. Asphericity and ellipticity corrections, in Seismological Algorithms, 75–85. ed. Doornbos, D.J., Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar

Doornbos, D.J. & Vlaar, N.J., 1973. Regions of seismic wave scattering in the Earth's mantle and precursors to PKP, Nature Phys. Sci., 243, 58–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dravinski, M., 1983. Scattering of plane SH waves by dipping layers of arbitrary shape, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 73, 1303–1319.Google Scholar

Dreger, D.S. & Helmberger, D.V., 1990. Broadband modelling of local earthquakes, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 80, 1162–1179.Google Scholar

Dreger, D.S. & Helmberger, D.V., 1993. Determination of source parameters at regional distances with single station or sparse network data, J. Geophys. Res., 98, 8107–8125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dueker, K.G. & Sheehan, A.F., 1997. Mantle discontinuity structure from midpoint stacks of converted P-to-S waves across the Yellowstone hotspot track, J. Geophys. Res., 101, 8313–8327.Google Scholar

Dziewonski, A.M., 1970. On regional differences in dispersion of mantle Rayleigh waves, Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc., 22, 289–325.Google Scholar

Dziewonski, A.M., 1971. Upper mantle models from ‘pure path’ dispersion data, J. Geophys. Res., 76, 2587–2601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dziewonski, A.M., 1984. Mapping the lower mantle: Determination of lateral heterogeneities in P velocity up to degree and order 6, J. Geophys. Res., 89, 5962–5952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dziewonski, A.M., 1995. Global seismic tomography of the mantle, Rev. Geophys., 33, 419–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dziewonski, A.M. & Hales, A.L., 1972. Numerical analysis of dispersed seismic waves, in Methods in Computational Physics, 11, 39–85. ed. B.A. Bolt, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar

Dziewonski, A.M. & Gilbert, F., 1976. The effect of small, aspherical corrections on travel times and a re-examination of the corrections for ellipticity, Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc., 44, 7–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dziewonski, A.M. & Anderson, D.L., 1981. Preliminary reference Earth model, Phys. Earth. Planet. Inter., 25, 297–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dziewonski, A.M. & Woodhouse, J.H., 1983. An experiment in systematic study of global seismicity: centroid moment tensors for 201 moderate and large earthquakes of 1981, J. Geophys. Res., 88, 3247–3271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dziewonski, A.M., Hales, A.L. & Lapwood, E.R., 1975. Parametrically simple Earth models consistent with geophysical data, Phys. Earth. Planet. Inter., 10, 12–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dziewonski, A.M., Chou, T.-A. & Woodhouse, J.H., 1981. Determination of earthquake source parameters from waveform data for studies of global and regional seismicity, J. Geophys. Res., 86, 2825–2852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dziewonski, A.M., Franzen, J.E. & Woodhouse, J.H., 1984. Centroid moment tensor solutions for January - March 1984, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 34, 209–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dziewonski, A.M., Ekström, G. & Maternovskaya, N.N., 1999. Centroid-moment tensor solutions for April-June, 1997, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 112, 1–9.

Ekström, G., Tromp, J. & Larson, E.W.F., 1997. Measurements and global models of surface wave propagation, J. Geophys. Res., 102, 8137–8157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Emmerich, H. & Korn, M., 1987. Incorporation of attentuation into time-domain computations of seismic wave fields, Geophysics, 52, 1252–1264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Engdahl, E.R. & Flinn, E.A., 1969. Seismic waves reflected from discontinuities within Earth's upper mantle, Science, 163, 177–179.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Engdahl, E.R., van der Hilst, R.D. & Buland, R., 1998. Global teleseismic earthquake relocation with improved travel times and procedures for depth determination, Bull Seism. Soc. Am., 88, 722–743.Google Scholar

England, P.C., Worthington, M.H. & King, D.W., 1977. Lateral variation in the structure of the upper mantle beneath Eurasia, Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc., 48, 71–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

England, P.C., Kennett, B.L.N. & Worthington, M.H., 1978. A comparison of upper mantle structures under Eurasia and the North Atlantic and Arctic oceans, Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc., 54, 575–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Estabrook, C.H. & Kind. R., 1996. The nature of the 660-kilometer upper-mantle seismic discontinuity from precursors to the PP phase, Science, 274, 1179–1182.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Faber, S. & Müller, G., 1980. Sp phases from the transition zone between the upper and lower mantle, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 70, 487–508.Google Scholar

Faber, S. & Müller, G., 1984. Converted phases from the mantle transition zone observed at European stations, J. Geophys., 54, 183–194.Google Scholar

Faccioli, E., Maggio, F., Paolucci, R. & Quarteroni, A., 1997. 2D and 3D elastic wave propagation by a pseudo-spectral domain decomposition method, J. Seismol., 1, 237–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Farra, V. & Vinnik, L., 2000. Upper mantle stratification by P and S receiver functions, Geophys. J. Int., 141, 699–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Farra, V., Vinnik, L.P., Romanowicz, B., Kosarev, G.L. & Kind, R., 1991. Inversion of teleseismic S particle motion for azimuthal anisotropy in the upper mantle: a feasibility study, Geophys. J. Int., 106, 421–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Field, E.D., 1996. Spectral amplification in a sediment-filled valley exhibiting clear basin-edge-induced waves, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 86, 991–1005.Google Scholar

Finlayson, B.A., 1972. The Method of Weighted Residuals and Variational Principles, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar

Finlayson, D.M., 1982. Seismic crustal structure of the Proterozoic north Australian craton between Tennant Creek and Mount Isa, J. Geophys. Res., 87, 10569–10.578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fischer, K.M., Creager, K.C. & Jordan, T.H., 1991. Mapping the Tonga slab, J. Geophys. Res., 96, 14403–14.427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Flanagan, M.P. & Shearer, P.M., 1998. Global mapping of topography on transition zone discontinuities by stacking SS precursors, J. Geophys. Res., 103, 2673–2692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frankel, A., 1993. Three-dimensional simulations of ground motions in the San Bernardino valley, California, for hypothetical earthquakes on the San Andreas fault, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 83, 1020–1041.Google Scholar

Fuchs, K., 1975. Synthetic seismograms of PS reflections from transition zones computed with the reflectivity method, J. Geophys., 41, 445–462.Google Scholar

Fuchs, K. & Schulz, K., 1976. Tunneling of low-frequency waves through the subcrustal lithosphere, J. Geophys., 42, 175–190.Google Scholar

Fujiwara, H., 2000. The fast multipole method for solving integral equations of three-dimensional topography and basin problems, Geophys. J. Int., 140, 198–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fukao, Y., 1984. Evidence from core-reflected shear wave for anisotropy in the Earth's mantle, Nature, 309, 695–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fukao, Y., Obayashi, M., Inoue, H. & Nenbai, M., 1992. Subduction zones stagnant in the lower mantle. J. Geophys. Res., 97, 4809–4822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fukuyama, E., Ishida, M., Dreger, D.S. & Kawai, H., 1998. Automated seismic moment tensor determination by using on-line broadband seismic waveforms, Zisin, 51, 149–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Furumura, M., Kennett, B.L.N. & Furumura, T., 1999. Seismic wavefield calculation for laterally heterogeneous Earth models II. - the effect of upper mantle heterogeneity, Geophys. J. Int., 138, 623–644.Google Scholar

Furumura, T. & Takenaka, H., 1996. 2.5-D modelling of elastic waves using the pseudospectral method Geophys. J. Int., 124, 820–832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Furumura, T. & Kennett, B.L.N., 1997, On the nature of regional seismic phases - II. On the effect of crustal barriers, Geophys. J. Int., 129, 221–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Furumura, T. & Kennett, B.L.N., 1998. On the nature of regional seismic phases - III. The influence of crustal heterogeneity on the wavefield for subduction earthquakes: the 1985 Michoacan and 1995 Copala, Guerrero, Mexico earthquakes, Geophys. J. Int., 135, 1060–1084.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Furumura, T. & Kennett, B.L.N., 2001. Variations in regional phase propagation in the area around Japan, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 96, 667–682.Google Scholar

Furumura, T. & Koketsu, K., 1998. Specific distribution of ground motion during the 1995 Kobe earthquake and its generation mechanism, Geophys. Res. Lett., 25, 785–788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Furumura, T. & Koketsu, K., 2000. Parallel 3-D simulation of ground motion for the 1995 Kobe earthquake: the component decomposition approach, Pure Appl. Geophys., 157, 2047–2062.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Furumura, T., Kennett, B.L.N. & Furumura, M., 1998. Synthetic seismograms for a laterally heterogeneous whole earth models by the pseudospectral method, Geophys. J. Int., 135, 845–860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Furumura, T., Koketsu, K. & Wen, K.L., 2002. Parallel PSM/GDSM hybrid simulations of ground motions from the 1999 Chi-Chi earthquake, Pure Appl. Geophys., in press.

Gajewski, D., Stangl, R., Fuchs, K. & Sandmeier, K.J., 1990. A new constraint on the composition of the topmost continental mantle - anomalously different depth increases of P and S velocity, Geophys. J. Int., 103, 497–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Garnero, E.J. & Helmberger, D.V., 1996. Seismic detection of a thin laterally varying boundary layer at the base of the mantle beneath the central Pacific, Geophys. Res. Lett., 23, 977–980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Garnero, E.J., Revenaugh, J., Williams, Q., Lay, T. & Kellogg, L.H., 1998. Ultralow velocity zone at the core mantle boundary, in The Core-Mantle Boundary Region, eds.M. Gurnis, M.E. Wysession, E. Knittle & B.A. Buffet, Geodynamics Monograph, 28, American Geophysical Union.Google Scholar

Gao, S., Liu, H., Davis, P.M. & Knopoff, L., 1996. Localised amplification of seismic waves and correlation with damage due to the Northridge earthquake, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 86, S209–S230.

Gee, L.S. & Jordan, T.H., 1992. Generalized seismological data functionals: 1. Theory, Geophys. J. Int., 111, 363–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Geiger, L., 1910. Herdbestimmung bei Erdbeden aus den Ankunftzeiten, K. Gessel. Wiss. Goett., 4, 331–349.Google Scholar

Geller, R.J. & Ohminato, T., 1994. Computation of synthetic seismograms and their partial derivatives for heterogeneous media with arbitrary natural boundary conditions using the Direct Solution Method (DSM), Geophys. J. Int., 116, 421–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Glatzmaier, G.A. & Roberts, P.H., 1995. A three-dimensional convective dynamo solution with rotating and finitely conducting inner core and mantle, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 91, 63–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Girardin, N. & Farra, V., 1998. Azimuthal anisotropy in the upper mantle from observations of P-to-S phases: application to southeast Australia, Geophys. J. Int., 133, 615–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goes, S., Govers, R. & Vacher, P., 2000. Shallow mantle temperatures under Europe from P and S tomography, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 11153–11169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldstein, P. & Dodge, P., 1999. Fast and accurate depth and source mechanism estimation using P-waveform modeling: a tool for special event analysis, event screening, and regional calibration, Geophys. Res. Lett., 26, 2569–2572. 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gorbatov, A., Fukao, Y. & Widiyantoro, S., 2001. Application of a three-dimensional ray tracing technique to global P, PP and Pdiff traveltime tomography, Geophys. J. Int., 146, 583–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grad, M. & Luosto, U., 1987. Seismic models of the crust of the Baltic shield along the SVEKA profile in Finland, Annales Geophysicae, 5B, 639–650.

Grand, S.P., 1987. Tomographic inversion for shear velocity beneath the North American plate, J. Geophys. Res., 92, 14065–14.090.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grand, S.P., 1994. Mantle shear structures beneath the Americas and surrounding oceans, J. Geophys. Res., 99, 11591–11.621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grand, S.P. & Helmberger, D.V., 1984a. Upper mantle shear structure of North America, Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc., 76, 399–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grand, S.P. & Helmberger, D.V., 1984b. Upper mantle shear structure beneath the northwest Atlantic Ocean, J. Geophys. Res., 89, 11465–11.475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grand, S.P. & Helmberger, D.V., 1985. Upper mantle shear structure beneath Asia from multi-bounce S waves, Phys. Earth. Planet, Inter., 41, 154–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grand, S.P., van der Hilst, R.D. & Widiyantoro, S., 1997. Global seismic tomography: a snapshot of convection in the Earth, GSA Today, 7(4), 1–7.Google Scholar

Graves, R.W., 1996. Simulating seismic wave propagation in 3-D elastic media using staggered grid finite difference schemes: stability and grid dispersion, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 86, 1091–1106.Google Scholar

Gregersen, S., 1982. Seismicity and observations of Lg wave attenuation in Greenland, Tectonophys., 89, 77–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gregersen, S., 1984. Lg wave propagation and crustal structure differences near Denmark and the North Sea, Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc., 79, 217–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gregersen, S. & TOR Working Group, 1999. Important findings expected from Europe's largest seismic array, EOS Trans. Am. Geophys. Union, 80, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gubbins, D. & Snieder, R., 1986. Dispersion of P subducted lithosphere: evidence for an eclogite layer, J. Geophys. Res., 96, 93–106.Google Scholar

Gudmundsson, O. & Sambridge, M., 1998. A regionalized upper mantle (RUM) seismic model, J. Geophys. Res., 103, 7121–7136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gudmundsson, O., Kennett, B.L.N. & Goody, A., 1994. Broadband observations of upper mantle seismic phases in northern Australia and the attenuation structure in the upper mantle, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 84, 207–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guggisberg, B. & Berthelsen, A., 1987. A two-dimensional model for the lithosphere beneath the Baltic Shield and its possible tectonic significance, Terra Cognita, 7, 631–638.Google Scholar

Gurnis, M., Wysession, M.E., Knittle, E. & Buffet, B.A. (eds.), 1998. The Core-Mantle Boundary Region, Geodynamics Monograph, 28, American Geophysical Union.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gurrola, H., Minster, J.B. & Owens, T., 1994. The use of velocity spectrum for stacking receiver functions and imaging upper mantle discontinuities, Geophys. J. Int., 117, 427–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gurrola, H., Baker, F.G. & Minster, J.B., 1995. Simultaneous time-domain deconvolution with application to the computation of receiver functions, Geophys. J. Int., 120, 537–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haase, J., Hauksson, E., Vernon, F. & Edelman, A., 1996. Modeling of ground motion from a 1994 Northridge aftershock using a tomographic velocity model of the Los Angeles basin, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 86, S156–S167.

Haddon, R.A.W. & Cleary, J.R., 1974. Evidence for scattering of seismic PKP waves near the mantle core boundary, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 8, 211–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haines, A.J., 1988. Multi-source, multi-receiver synthetic seismograms for laterally heterogeneous media using f − k domain propagators, Geophys. J. Int., 95, 237–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hales, A.L., 1971. The travel times of P seismic waves and their relevance to the upper mantle velocity distribution, Tectonophys., 13, 447–482.Google Scholar

Hales, A.L., Muirhead, K.J. & Rynn, J.W., 1980. A compressional velocity distribution for the upper mantle, Tectonophys., 63, 309–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hammond, W.C. & Humphreys, E., 2000a. Upper mantle seismic wave velocity: effects of realistic partial melt geometries, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 10975–10986.Google Scholar

Hammond, W.C. & Humphreys, E., 2000b. Upper mantle seismic wave attenuation: effects of realistic partial melt distribution, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 10987–10999.Google Scholar

Hanks, T.C. & Krawinkler, H., 1991. The 1989 Loma Prieta, California, earthquake and its effects: introduction to the special issue, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 81, 1415–1423.Google Scholar

Hansen, R.A., Ringdal, F. & Richards, P.G., 1990. The stability of rms Lg measurements and their potential for accurate estimates of the yields of Soviet underground nuclear explosions, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 80, 2106–2126.Google Scholar

Harjes, H.-P., 1990. Design and siting of a new regional seismic array in central Europe, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 80, 1801–1817.Google Scholar

Hartzell, S.H., Stewart, G.S. & Mendoza, C., 1991. Comparison of L1 and L2 norms in a teleseismic waveform inversion for the slip history of the Loma Prieta, California, earthquake, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 81, 1518–1539.Google Scholar

Hartzell, S.H., Harmson, S., Frankel, A. & Larson, S., 1999. Calculation of broadband histories of ground motion: comparison of methods and validation using strong-ground motion from the 1994 Northridge earthquake, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 89, 1484–1504.Google Scholar

Hasegawa, A., Zhao, D., Hori, S., Yamamoto, A. & Horiuchi, S., 1991. Deep structure of the northeastern Japan arc and its relationship to seismic and volcanic activity, Nature, 352, 683–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hatayama, K. & Fujiwara, H., 1998. Excitation of secondary Love and Rayleigh waves in a three-dimensional sedimentary basin evaluated by the direct boundary element method with normal modes, Geophys. J. Int., 133, 260–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

He, X. & Tromp, J., 1996. Normal mode constraints on the structure of the Earth, J. Geophys. Res., 101, 20053–20.082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heaton, T.H., Hall, J.F., Wald, D.J. & Halling, M.W., 1995. Response of high-rise and base-isolated buildings to a hypothetical Mw 7.0 blind thrust earthquake, Science, 267, 206–211.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hedlin, M.A.H. & Shearer, P., 2000. An analysis of large scale variations in small-scale mantle heterogeneity using Global Seismographic Network recordings of precursors to PKP, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 13655–13673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Helmberger, D.V. & Wiggins, R.A., 1971. Upper mantle structure of the midwestern United States, J. Geophys. Res., 76, 3229–3245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Helmberger, D.V. & Engen, G.R., 1974. Upper mantle shear structure, J. Geophys. Res., 79, 4017–4028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Helmberger, D.V., Song, X.J. & Zhu, L., 2001. Crustal complexity from regional waveform tomography: aftershocks of the 1992 Landers earthquake, California. J. Geophys. Res., 106, 609–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hestholm, S., & Rudd, B., 1998 3-D finite-difference elastic wave modelling including surface topography, Geophysics, 63, 613–622.Google Scholar

Hirahara, K., 1977. A large-scale three-dimensional seismic structure under the Japan islands and the Sea of Japan, J. Phys. Earth, 28, 221–241.Google Scholar

Hirahara, K. & Mikumo, T., 1980. Three-dimensional seismic structure of subducting lithospheric plates under the Japan islands, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 21, 109–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hirn, A., 1977. Anisotropy in the continental upper mantle: possible evidence from explosion seismology, Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc., 49, 49–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hirn, A., Steinmetz, L., Kind, R. & Fuchs, K., 1973. Long range profiles in western Europe. II. Fine structure of the lithosphere in Bretagne (France), Z. Geophys., 39, 363–384.Google Scholar

Hirn, A., Prodehl, C. & Steinmetz, L., 1975. An experimental test of models of the lower lithosphere in Bretagne (France), Ann. G´eophys., 31, 517–530.Google Scholar

Hiyoshi, Y., 2001. Regional surfce waveform inversion for Australian paths, Ph.D. thesis, Australian National University.Google Scholar

Holland, J.H., 1975 Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar

Hung, S.-H., Dahlen, F.A. & Nolet, G., 2000. Frèchet kernels for finite frequency traveltimes - II. Examples, Geophys. J. Int., 141, 175–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Husebye, E., King, D.W. & Haddon, R.A.W., 1976. Precursors to PKIKP and seismic wave scattering near the mantle-core boundary. J. Geophys. Res., 81, 1870–1882.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hutchings, L., 1994. Kinematic earthquake models and synthesised ground motion using empirical Green's functions, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 84, 1028–1050.Google Scholar

Igel, H. & Weber, M., 1996. P-SV wave propagation in the whole mantle using high-order finite differences: application to lowermost mantle structure, Geophys. Res. Lett., 23, 415–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Igel, H. & Gudmundsson, O., 1997. Frequency dependent effects on travel times and waveforms of long period S and SS waves, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 104, 229–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Igel, H. & Geller, R.J., 2000. Numerical modelling of global seismic wave propagtion: algorithms - accuracy - verification, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 119, 1–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Igel, H., Takeuchi, N., Geller, R.J., Mègnin, C., Bunge, H.-P., Clèvède, E., Dalkolmo, J. & Romanowicz, B., 2000. The COSY project: verification of global seismic modelling algorithms, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 119, 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Inoue, T. & Miyatake, T., 1997. 3-D simulation of near-field strong motion: basin edge effect derived from rupture directivity, Geophys. Res. Lett., 24, 905–908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Inoue, H., Fukao, Y., Tanabe, K. & Ogata, Y., 1990. Whole mantle P-wave mantle tomography, Phys. Earth. Planet Inter., 59, 294–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ishii, M., Tromp, J., Dziewonski, A.M. & Ekström, G., 2002a. Joint inversion of normal-mode and body wave data for inner-core anisotropy: 1. Simple inner-core models and mantle heterogeneity, J. Geophys. Res., submitted.CrossRef

Ishii, M., Tromp, J., Dziewonski, A.M. & Ekström, G., 2002b. Joint inversion of normal-mode and body wave data for inner-core anisotropy: 2. Possible complexities within the inner core and mantle, J. Geophys. Res., submitted.CrossRef

Iyer, H.M., Pakiser, L.C., Stuart, D.J. & Warren, D.H., 1969. Project Early Rise: seismic probing of the upper mantle, J. Geophys. Res., 74, 4409–4441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Iyer, H.M. & Hirahara, K., 1993 Seismic Tomography, Chapman & Hall, London.Google Scholar

Jacob, A.W.B. & Booth, D.C., 1977. Observations of PS reflections from the Moho, J. Geophys., 43, 687–692.Google Scholar

Jeffreys, H., 1932. An alternative to the rejection of observations. Proc. R. Soc. Lond., 137A, 78–87.Google Scholar

Jeffreys, H. & Bullen, K.E., 1940. Seismological Tables, British Association Seismological Committee, London.Google Scholar

Jobert, N. Gaulon, R., Dieulin, A. & Roult, G., 1977. Sur les ondes de très longue pèriode, caractèristiques du manteau supèrieur, Compte Rendu Acad. Sci. Paris, B285, 49–51.Google Scholar

Jepsen, D.C. & Kennett, B.L.N., 1990. Three component array analysis, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 80, 2032–2052.Google Scholar

Jones, L.M. & Helmberger, D.V., 1998. Earthquake source parameters in the eastern California Shear Zone, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 88, 1337–1352.Google Scholar

Jones, L.E., Mori, J. & Helmberger, D.V., 1992. Short-period constraints on the proposed transition zone discontinuity, J. Geophys. Res., 97, 8765–8774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jordan, T.H., 1975. The continental tectosphere, Rev. Geophys., 13, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jordan, T.H., 1977. Lithospheric slab penetration into the lower mantle beneath the Sea of Okhotsk, J. Geophys. Res., 43, 473–496.Google Scholar

Jordan, T.H., 1978. A procedure for estimating lateral variations from low-frequency eigenspectra data, Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc., 52, 441–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jordan, T.H., 1988. Structure and formation of continental tectosphere, J. Petrology, Special Lithosphere Issue, 11–37.Google Scholar

Jordan, T.H. & Lynn, W.S., 1974. A velocity anomaly in the lower mantle, J. Geophys. Res., 79, 2679–2685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jordan, T.H., & Sverdrup, K.A., 1981. Teleseismic location techniques and their application to earthquake clusters in the South-Central Pacific, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 71, 1105–1130.Google Scholar

Jurkevics, A., 1988. Polarization analysis of three-component array data, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 78, 1725–1743.Google Scholar

Kaiho, Y. & Kennett, B.L.N., 2000. Three-dimensional seismic structure beneath the Australasian region from refracted wave observations, Geophys J. Int., 142, 651–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kamae, K. & Irikura, K., 1998. Source model of the 1995 Hyogo-ken Nanbu earthquake and simulation of near-source ground motion, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 88, 400–412.Google Scholar

Kaminski, W., Bamford, D., Faber, S., Jacob, B., Nunn, K. & Prodehl, C., 1976. A lithospheric profile in Britain in Britain II - A preliminary report on the recording of a local earthquake, J. Geophys., 45, 255–272.Google Scholar

Kanamori, H., 1972. Tectonic implications of the 1944 Tonankai and the 1946 Nankaido earthquakes, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 5, 129–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kanamori, H., Mori, J., Hauksson, E., Heaton, T.H., Hutton, L.K. & Jones, L.M., 1993. Determination of earthquake energy release and ML using TERRAscope, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 83, 330–346.Google Scholar

K'arason, H. & van der Hilst, R.D., 2001. Constraints on mantle convection from seismic tomography, in History and Dynamics of Plate Motion, 277–288, eds. M., Richards, R., Gordon & R.D. van der, Hilst, AGU Geophysical Monograph Series, 121.Google Scholar

K'arason, H. & van der Hilst, R.D., 2001. Tomographic imaging of the lowermost mantle with differential times of refracted and diffracted core phases (PKP, Pdiff), J. Geophys. Res., 106, 6569–6588.Google Scholar

Kato, M. & Kawakatsu, H., 2001. Seismological in situ estimation of density jumps across the transition zone discontinuities beneath Japan, Geophys. Res. Lett., 28, 2541–2544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kato, M., Misawa, M. & Kawakatsu, H., 2001. Small subsidence of the 660-km discontinuity beneath Japan probed by ScS reverberations, Geophys. Res. Lett., 28, 447–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Katzman, R., Zhao, L. & Jordan, T.H., 1998. High-resolution two-dimensional vertical tomography of the central Pacific mantle using ScS reverberations and frequency-dependent travel times, J. Geophys. Res., 103, 17933–17 932.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kawase, H., 1996. The cause of the damage belt in Kobe: “The basin-edge effect”, constructive interference of the direct S-wave with the basin induced/diffracted Rayleigh waves, Seism. Res. Lett., 67, 25–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kawakatsu, H., 1995. Automated near-realtime CMT inversion, Geophys. Res. Lett., 22, 2569–2572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Katzman, R., Zhao, L. & Jordan, T.H., 1998. High-resolution, 2-dimensional vertical tomography of the central Pacific mantle using ScS reverberations and frequency dependent traveltimes, J. Geophys. Res., 103, 17933–17 971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keers, H., Nolet, G. & Dahlen, F.A., 1996. Ray theoretical analysis of Lg, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 86, 726–736.Google Scholar

Kelly, K.R., Ward, R.W., Treitel, S. & Alford, R.M., 1976. Synthetic seismograms: A finite difference approach. Geophysics, 41, 2–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kendall, J.-M. & Shearer, P.M., 1994. Lateral variations in D” thickness from long-period shear-wave data, J. Geophys. Res., 99, 11575–11 590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kendall, J.-M. & Silver, P.G., 1996. Constraints from seismic anisotropy on the nature of the lowermost mantle, Nature, 381, 409–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kennett, B.L.N., 1975. The effects of attenuation on seismograms, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am, 65, 1643–1651.Google Scholar

Kennett, B.L.N., 1976. A comparison of travel time inversions, Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc., 44, 1643–1651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kennett, B.L.N., 1977a. Inversion of long-range seismic profiles, J. Geophys., 43, 243–356.Google Scholar

Kennett, B.L.N., 1977b. Towards a more detailed seismic picture of the oceanic crust and mantle, Marine Geophys. Res., 3, 7–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kennett, B.L.N., 1984a. Guided waves in laterally varying media, I: Theoretical development, Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc., 79, 235–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kennett, B.L.N., 1984b. An operator approach to forward modelling, data processing and migration, Geophys. Prospect., 32, 1074–1090.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kennett, B.L.N., 1985. On regional S, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 75, 1077–1088.Google Scholar

Kennett, B.L.N., 1986a. Wavenumber and wavetype coupling in laterally heterogeneous media, Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc., 87, 313–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kennett, B.L.N., 1986b. Lg waves and structural boundaries, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 76, 1131–1141.Google Scholar

Kennett, B.L.N., 1987. Observational and theoretical constraints on crustal and upper mantle heterogeneity, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 47, 235–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kennett, B.L.N., 1989a. Lg-wave propagation in heterogeneous media, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 79, 860–872.Google Scholar

Kennett, B.L.N., 1989b. On the nature of regional seismic phases - I. Phase representations for Pn, Pg, Sn, Lg, Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc., 98, 447–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kennett, B.L.N., 1991a. The removal of free surface interactions from three-component seismograms, Geophys J. Int., 104, 153–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kennett, B.L.N., 1991b. Seismic velocity gradients in the upper mantle Geophys. Res. Lett., 18, 1115–1118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kennett, B.L.N., 1991c. IASPEI 1991 Seismological Tables, Research School of Earth Sciences, Australian National University, Canberra.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kennett, B.L.N., 1992. Locating oceanic earthquakes - the influence of regional models and location criteria, Geophys. J. Int., 108, 945–854.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kennett, B.L.N., 1993a. The distance dependance of regional phase discriminants, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 83, 1155–1166.Google Scholar

Kennett, B.L.N., 1993b. Seismic structure and heterogeneity in the upper mantle, in Relating Geophysical Structures and Processes: the Jeffreys Volume, AGU Monograph 76, IUGG Volume 16, 53–66, American Geophysical Union, Washington.Google Scholar

Kennett, B.L.N., 1995. Approximations for surface wave propagation in laterally varying media, Geophys. J. Int., 122, 470–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kennett, B.L.N., 1998. Guided waves in three-dimensional structures, Geophys. J. Int., 133, 159–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kennett, B.L.N. & Mykkeltveit, S., 1984. Guided waves in laterally varying media, II: Lg-waves in north-western Europe, Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc., 79, 257–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kennett, B.L.N. & Bowman, J. R., 1990. The velocity structure and heterogeneity of the upper mantle, Phys. Earth. Planet. Inter., 59, 134–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kennett, B.L.N. & Nolet, G., 1990. The interaction of the S-wavefield with upper mantle heterogeneity, Geophys. J. Int., 101, 751–762.Google Scholar

Kennett, B.L.N. & Engdahl, E.R., 1991. Traveltimes for global earthquake location and phase identification, Geophys. J. Int., 105, 429–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kennett, B.L.N. & Sambridge, M.S., 1992. Earthquake location: genetic algorithms for teleseisms, Phys. Earth. Planet. Inter., 75, 103–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kennett, B.L.N. & Gudmundsson, O., 1996. Ellipticity corrections for seismic phases, Geophys. J. Int., 127, 40–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kennett, B.L.N. & Sambridge, M.S., 1998. Inversion for multiple parameter classes, Geophys. J. Int., 134, 304–306.Google Scholar

Kennett, B.L.N. & Widiyantoro, S., 1999. A low seismic wavespeed anomaly beneath northwestern India - a seismic signature of the Deccan plume?, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 165, 145–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kennett, B.L.N. & Furumura, T., 2001. Regional Phases in continental and oceanic environments, Geophys. J. Int., 146, 562–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kennett, B.L.N. & Furumura, T., 2002. The influence of 3-D structure on the propagation of seismic waves away from earthquakes, Pure Appl. Geophys., in press.CrossRef

Kennett, B.L.N. & Ringdal, F., 2001. Locating seismic events in a CTBT context, Pure Appl. Geophys., 158, 7–18.Google Scholar

Kennett, B.L.N. & Yoshizawa, K., 2002. A reappraisal of regional surface wave tomography, Geophys. J. Int., 150, in press.CrossRef

Kennett, B.L.N., Bostock, M.G. & Xie, J.-K., 1990. Guided wave tracking in 3-D - a tool for interpreting complex regional seismograms, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 80, 633–642.Google Scholar

Kennett, B.L.N., Gudmundsson, O., & Tong, C., 1994. The upper-mantle S and P velocity structure beneath northern Australia from broad-band observations, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 86, 85–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kennett, B.L.N., Engdahl, E.R. & Buland, R., 1995. Constraints on the velocity structure in the Earth from travel times, Geophys. J. Int., 122, 108–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kennett, B.L.N., Widiyantoro, S. & van der Hilst, R.D., 1998. Joint seismic tomography for bulk-sound and shear wavespeed in the Earth's mantle, J. Geophys. Res., 103, 12 469.ndash;12 493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kennett, B.L.N., Marson-Pidgeon, K. & Sambridge, M.S., 2000. Seismic source characterization using a Neighbourhood Algorithm, Geophys. Res. Lett., 27, 3401–3404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kennett, B.L.N., Gregersen, S., Mykkeltveit, S. & Newmark, R., 1985. Mapping of crustal heterogeneity in the North Sea basin via the propagation of Lg waves, Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc., 83, 299–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kincaid, C. & Olson, P., 1987. An experimental study of subduction and slab migration, J. Geophys. Res., 92, 13832–13 840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kind, R., 1974, Long range propagation of seismic energy in the lower lithosphere, J. Geophys., 40, 189–202.Google Scholar

Kind, R., Kosarev, G.L. & Petersen, N.V., 1995. Receiver functions at the stations of the German Regional Seismic Network (GRSN), Geophys. J. Int., 121, 191–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

King, D.W. & Calcagnile, G., 1976. P-wave velocities in the upper mantle beneath Fennoscandia and Western Russia, Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc., 46, 407–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

King, D.W., Haddon, R.A.W. & Cleary, J. R., 1974. Array analysis of precursors to PKIKP in the distance range 128◦ to 142◦, Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc., 37, 157–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

King, D.W., Haddon, R.A.W. & Husebye, E.S., 1975. Precursors to PP, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 10, 103–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kinoshita, S., Fujiwara, H., Mikoshiba, T. & Hoshino, T., 1992. Secondary Love waves observed by a strong-motion array in the Tokyo lowlands, Japan, J. Phys. Earth, 40, 99–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kirkwood, S.C., 1978. The significance of isotropic inversion of anisotropic surface-wave dispersion, Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc., 55, 131–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kirkwood, S.C. & Crampin, S., 1981. Surface-wave propagation in an ocean basin with an anisotropic upper mantle: observations of polarization anomalies, Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc., 64, 487–497.Google Scholar

Knopoff, L., 1972. Observation and inversion of surface wave dispersion, Tectonophys., 13, 497–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Knopoff, L., Schwab, F. & Kausel, E., 1973. Interpretation of Lg, Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc, 33, 389–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Knopoff, L., Mitchel, R.G., Kausel, E.G. & Schwab, F., 1979. A search for the oceanic Lg phase, Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc, 56, 211–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kohler, M.D., 1997. Three-dimensional velocity structure and resolution of the core-mantle boundary region from whole-mantle inversions of body waves, Phys. Earth. Planet. Inter., 101, 85–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koketsu, K. & Higashi, S., 1992. Three-dimensional topography of the sediment/basement interface in the Tokyo Metropolitan Area, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 82, 2328–2349.Google Scholar

Koketsu, K. & Kikuchi, K., 2000. Propagation of seismic ground motion in the Kanto Basin, Japan, Science, 288, 1237–1239.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Koketsu, K., Kennett, B.L.N. & Takenaka, H., 1991. 2-D reflectivity method and synthetic seismograms for irregularly layered structure - II. Invariant embedding approach, Geophys. J. Int., 105, 119–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Komatitsch, D. & Vilotte, J.P., 1998. The spectral-element method: an efficient tool to simulate the seismic response of 2D and 3D geological structures, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 88, 368–392.Google Scholar

Komatitsch, D. & Tromp, J., 1999. Introduction to the spectral element method for three-dimensional seismic wave propagation, Geophys. J. Int., 139, 806–822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Komatitsch, D. & Tromp, J., 2002a. Spectral-element simulations of global seismic wave propagation - I. Validation, Geophys. J. Int., submitted.CrossRef

Komatitsch, D. & Tromp, J., 2002b. Spectral-element simulations of global seismic wave propagation - II. 3-D models, oceans, rotation and self-gravitation, Geophys. J. Int., submitted.CrossRef

Kosarev, G., Kind, R., Sobolev, S.V., Yuan, X., Hanka, W. & Oreshin, S., 1999. Seismic evidence for a detached Indian lithosphere beneath Tibet, Science, 283, 1306–1309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kosarev, G.L., Petersen, N.V., Vinnik, L.P. & Roecker, S.W., 1993. Receiver functions for the Tien Shan analog broadband network: Contrasts in the evolution of structures across the Talasso-Fergana fault, J. Geophys. Res., 98, 4437–4448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kremenetskaya, E., Asming, V. & Ringdal, F., 2001. Seismic location calibration of the European Arctic, Pure Appl. Geophys., 158, 117–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kuo, B-Y. & Wu, K-Y., 1997. Global shear velocity heterogeneities in the D” layer: inversion from Sd – SKS travel times, J. Geophys. Res, 102, 11775–11 788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Langston, C.A., 1977. Corvallis, Oregon, crustal and upper mantle receiver structure from teleseismic P and S waves, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 67, 713–724.Google Scholar

Langston, C.A., 1979. Structure under Mount Rainier, Washington,inferred from teleseismic body waves, J. Geophys. Res., 84, 4749–4762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Langston, C.A. & Helmberger, D.V., 1975. A procedure for modelling shallow dislocation sources, Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc., 42, 117–130.Google Scholar

Laske, G., 1995. Global observations of off-great-circle propagation of long-period surface waves, Geophys. J. Int, 123, 245–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Laske, G. & Masters, G., 1996. Constraints on global phase velocity maps by long-period polarization data, J. Geophys. Res., 101, 16059–16 075.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Laske, G. & Masters, G., 1999. Rotation of the inner core from a new analysis of free scillations, Nature, 402, 66–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lay, T., 1994. The fate of descending slabs, Ann. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci., 22, 33–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lay, T. & Wallace, T., 1995. Modern Global Seismology, Academic Press, Orlando.Google Scholar

Lay, T., Garnero, E.J., Young, C.J. & Gaherty, J.B., 1997. Scale lengths of shear velocity heterogeneity at the base of the mantle from S wave differential times, J. Geophys. Res., 102, 9887–9910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lay, T., Williams, Q., Garnero, E.J., Kellogg, L.H. & Wysession, M.E., 1998. Seismic wave anisotropy in the D”region and its implications, in The Core-Mantle Boundary Region, eds. M., Gurnis, M.E., Wysession, E., Knittle & B.A., Buffet, Geodynamics Monograph, 28, American Geophysical Union.Google Scholar

LeFevre, L.V. & Helmberger, D.V., 1989. Upper mantle P velocity structure of the Canadian shield, J. Geophys. Res., 94, 17749–17 765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lerner-Lam, A.L. & Jordan, T.H., 1983. Earth structure analysis from fundamental and higher-mode waveform analysis, Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc., 75, 759–797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levander, A.R. & Hill, N.R., 1985. P-SV resonances in irregular low velocity surface layers, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 75, 847–864.Google Scholar

Leven, J.H., 1985. The application of synthetic seismograms in the interpretation of the upper mantle P-wave velocity structure in northern Australia, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 38, 9–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lèvêque, J.J., Cara, M. & Rouland, D., 1991. Waveform inversion of surface wave data : test of a new tool for systematic investigation of upper mantle structures, Geophys. J. Int., 104, 565–581.Google Scholar

Lèvêque, J., Debayle, E. & Maupin, V., 1998. Anisotropy in the Indian Ocean upper mantle from Rayleigh- and Love-waveform inversion, Geophys. J. Int., 133, 529–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levin, V. & Park, J., 1998. Quasi-Love phases between Tonga and Hawaii: Observations, simulations and explanations, J. Geophys. Res., 103, 24321–24 331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leonard, M. & Kennett, B.L.N., 1999. Multi-component autoregressive techniques for the analysis of seismograms, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 113, 247–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levshin, A. L., 1985. Effect of lateral inhomogeneities on surface wave amplitude measurements, Ann. Geophys., 3, 511–518.Google Scholar

Lighthill, J., 1978. Waves in Fluids, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Liu, X.-F. & Tromp, J., 1996. Uniformly valid body-wave ray theory, Geophys. J. Int., 127, 461–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Liu, X-F. & Dziewonski, A.M., 1994. Improved resolution of the the lowermost shear velocity structure using SKS – S data, EOS Trans. Am. Geophys. Union, 75, Spring Meeting Suppl., 232.

Lundgren, P.R. & Giardini, D., 1992. Seismicity, shear-failure and modes of deformation in deep subduction zones, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 74, 63–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Luosto, U, Flueh, E.R., Lund, C.E., Banda, E., Bialas, J., Cassidy, F., Chroston, N., Green, C., Ivanoff, C., Kiorbor, L., Moeller, C. & Yliniemi, J., 1989. The crustal structure along the POLAR profile from seismic refraction investigations, Tectonophys, 162, 51–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lysmer, J. & Drake, L.A., 1972. A finite element method for seismology, in Methods in Computational Physics, 11, 181–216. ed. B.A., Bolt, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar

McGarr, A., Celebi, M., Sembera, E., Noce, T. & Mueller, C., 1991. Ground motion at the San Francisco International Airport from the Loma Prieta earthquake. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 81, 1923–1944.Google Scholar

McNamara, D.E., Owens, T.J. & Walter, W.R., 1996. Propagation characteristics of Lg across the Tibetan plateau. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 86, 457–469.Google Scholar

Marfurt, K., 1984. Accuracy of finite-difference and finite-element modeling of the scalar wave equation, Geophysics, 49, 533–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marquering, H. & Snieder, R., 1995. Surface-wave mode coupling for efficient forward modelling and inversion of body wave phases, Geophys. J. Int., 120, 186–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marson-Pidgeon, K., Savage, M.K., Gledhill, K. & Stuart, G., 1999. Seismic anisotropy beneath the lower half of the North Island, New Zealand, J. Geophys. Res., 104, 20277–20 286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Masters, G. & Gilbert, F., 1981. Structure of the inner core inferred from observations of its spheroidal shear modes, Geophys. Res. Lett., 8, 569–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Masters, G. & Ritzwoller, M., 1987. Low frequency seismology and three-dimensional structure - observational aspects, in Mathematical Geophysics, eds. N.J., Vlaar, G., Nolet, M.J. R., Wortel & S.A.P.L., Cloetingh, D. Riedel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar

Masters, T.G. & Shearer, P.M., 1990. Summary of seismological constraints on the structure of the Earth's core, J. Geophys. Res., 95, 21691–21 695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Masters, T.G. & Widmer, R., 1995. Free oscillations: Frequencies and attenuation, 104–125, in Global Earth Physics: a handbook of physical constants, ed. Ahrens, T.J., American Geophysical Union, Washington.Google Scholar

Masters, G., Jordan, T.H., Silver, P.G. & Gilbert, F., 1982. Aspherical earth structure from fundamental spheroidal mode data, Nature, 298, 609–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Masters, G., Johnson, S., Laske, G. & Bolton, H., 1996. A shear-velocity model of the mantle, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., 354A, 1385–1411.Google Scholar

Masters, G., Laske, G., Bolton, H. & Dziewonski, A., 2000. The relative behaviour of shear velocity, bulk sound speed, and compressional velocity in the mantle: implications for chemical and thermal structure, in Earth's Deep Interior: Mineral Physics and Tomography from the Atomic to the Global Scale, eds. S.I., Karato, A.M., Forte, R.C., Liebermann, G., Masters & L., Stixrude, AGU Geophysical Monograph, 117, 63–87.Google Scholar

Maupin, V., 1988. Surface waves across 2D structure: a method based on coupled local modes, Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc., 93, 173–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maupin, V., 1989. Surface waves in weakly anisotropic structures: on the use of ordinary or quasi-degenerate perturbation methods, Geophys. J. Int., 98, 553–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maupin, V., 1990. Modelling of three-component Lg waves in anisotropic crustal models, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 80, 1311–1325.Google Scholar

Maupin, V., 1994. On the possibility of anisotropy in the D” layer as inferred from the polarization of diffracted S waves, Phys. Earth. Planet. Inter., 87, 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maupin, V., 2001. A multiple scattering scheme for modelling surface wave propagation in isotropic and anisotropic three-dimensional structures Geophys. J. Int., 146, 332–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maupin, V., & Kennett, B.L.N., 1987. On the use of truncated modal expansions in laterally varying media, Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc., 91, 837–851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mechie, J., Egorkin, A.V., Fuchs, K., Ryberg, T., Solidilov, L. & Wenzel, F., 1993. P-wave mantle velocity structure beneath northern Eurasia from long-range recordings along the profile Quartz, Phys. Earth. Planet. Inter., 79, 269–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Megnin, C. & Romanowicz, B., 2000. The three-dimensional shear velocity structure of the mantle from the inversion of body, surface and higher-mode waveforms, Geophys. J. Int., 143, 709–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Melbourne, T. & Helmberger, D.V., 2002. Pure path mantle shear structure along the East Pacific Rise, J. Geophys. Res., 107, in press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Menke, W.H. & Richards, P.G., 1980. Crust-mantle whispering gallery phases: A deterministic model of teleseismic Pn wave propagation, J. Geophys. Res., 85, 5416–5422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mellors, R.J., Camp, V.E., Vernon, F.L., Al-Amri, A & Ghalib, A., 1999. Regional waveform propagationm in the Arabian Peninsula, J. Geophys. Res., 104, 20221–20 235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mitchell, B.J. & Cong, L., 1998. Lg coda Q and its relation to the structure and evolution of continents: a global perspective, Pure Appl. Geophys., 153, 639–654.Google Scholar

Moczo, P., Bystrický, E., Kristek, J., Carcione, J.M. & Bouchon, M., 1997. Hybrid modelling of P-SV seismic motion at inhomogeneous viscoelastic topographic structures, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 87, 1305–1323.Google Scholar

Moczo, P., Kristek, J. & Halada, L., 2000. 3-D fourth order staggered grid finite difference schemes: stability and grid dispersion, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 90, 587–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mohorovičić, A., 1910. Das Beben von 8. Okt. 1909, Jahrb. Meteorol. Obs. Agram (Zagreb), 9, Teil IV.

Montalbetti, J.F. & Kanasewich, E., 1970. Enhancement of teleseismic body wave phases with a polarization filter, Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc., 21, 119–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Montagner, J.P., 1986a. Regional three-dimensional structures using long-period surface waves, Ann. Geophys., 4, 283–294.Google Scholar

Montagner, J.P., 1986b. Three-dimensional structure of the Indian Ocean inferred from long-period surface waves, Geophys. Res. Lett., 13, 315–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Montagner, J.-P., 1998. Where can seismic anisotropy be detected in the Earth's Mantle? In boundary layers Pure Appl. Geophys, 151, 223–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Montagner, J.P. & Jobert, N., 1988. Vectorial tomography, 2, Application to the Indian Ocean, Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc., 94, 309–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Montagner, J.P. & Tanimoto, T., 1991. Global upper mantle tomography of seismic velocities and anisotropies, J. Geophys. Res., 96, 20337–20 351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Montagner, J-P. & Kennett, B.L.N., 1996. How to reconcile body-wave and normal mode reference Earth models? Geophys. J. Int., 125, 229–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morelli, A. & Dziewonski, A.M., 1987. The harmonic expansion approach to the determination of deep earth structure, in Seismic Tomography, ed G., Nolet, Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar

Morelli, A., Dziewonski, A.M. & Woodhouse, J.H., 1986. Anisotropy of the inner core inferred from PKIKP travel times, Geophys. Res. Lett., 13, 1545–1548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mori, J. & Helmberger, D.V., 1995. Localised boundary layer below the mid-Pacific velocity anomaly identified from a PcP precursor, J. Geophys. Res., 100, 20359–20 365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morita, Y., 1996. The characteristics of J-array seismograms, J. Phys. Earth., 44, 657–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morozov, I.B., Morozova, E.A. & Smithson, S.B., 1998. On the nature of the teleseismic Pn phase observed in the recordings from the ultra-long-range profile “Quartz”, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 88, 62–73.Google Scholar

Morozov, I.B. & Smithson, S.B., 2000. Coda of long-range arrivals from nuclear explosions, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 90, 929–939.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morozova, E.A., Morozov, I.B., Smithson, S.B. & Solodilov, L.N., 1999. Heterogenity of the upper mantle beneath the ultra-long-range profile Quartz, J. Geophys. Res., 104, 20 329.ndash;20 348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Muirhead, K.J., 1968. Eliminating false alarms when detecting seismic events automatically, Nature, 217, 533–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Müuller, G., 1985. The reflectivity method: A tutorial, J. Geophys., 38, 153–174.Google Scholar

Mykkeltveit, S. & Ringdal, F., 1981. Phase identification and event location at regional distances using small-aperture array data, 467–483, in Identification of Seismic Sources: Earthquake or Underground Explosion, eds. E.S., Husebye & S., Mykkeltveit, D. Reidel Dordrecht.Google Scholar

Mykkeltveit, S., Ringdal, F., Kvarna, T. & Alewine, R.W., 1990. Application of regional arrays in seismic verification, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 80, 1777–1800.Google Scholar