In 1933, reviewing a production of Twelfth Night, Virginia Woolf announced,

Applied to the work of critics, her image of the last group of Shakespearians in ceaseless motion suggests a group of the damned in a circle of Dante's Inferno. Those of us committed to what is now labelled stage-centred or performance oriented criticism scurry to and fro, risking finding, like most looters, that much of our booty turns out to be useless and worthless: as one of the soldiers curses, while plundering the battlefield in Coriolanus, 'A murrain on't, I took this for silver' (1.6.3).

Critics often complain about the taxonomic systems used for Shakespeare. Dissatisfied with FI'S 'comedies, histories, tragedies', bored with divisions like 'the major tragedies', 'the problem plays' or 'the romances', we try to find new and invigorating sub-divisions of the canon, new juxtapositions designed to illuminate the perceived relationships of texts. My major piece of plunder from this year's stint of reviewing is a new system for grouping Shakespeare plays. If my system is, like any other ever offered, neither cast-iron nor water-tight, as plays seem to demand awkwardly to belong to more than one group, it is at least more likely to be silver than Coriolanus' soldier's booty.