Book contents
- Ship Resistance and PropulsionSecond Edition
- Ship Resistance and Propulsion
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Preface to the Second Edition
- Preface to the First Edition
- Nomenclature
- Abbreviations
- Figure Acknowledgements
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Propulsive Power
- 3 Components of Hull Resistance
- 4 Model–Ship Extrapolation
- 5 Model–Ship Correlation
- 6 Restricted Water Depth and Breadth
- 7 Measurement of Resistance Components
- 8 Wake and Thrust Deduction
- 9 Numerical Estimation of Ship Resistance
- 10 Resistance Design Data
- 11 Propulsor Types
- 12 Propeller Characteristics
- 13 Powering Process
- 14 Hull Form Design
- 15 Numerical Methods for Propeller Analysis
- 16 Propulsor Design Data
- 17 Reductions in Propulsive Power and Emissions
- 18 Applications
- Book part
- Index
- References
11 - Propulsor Types
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 25 August 2017
Book contents
- Ship Resistance and PropulsionSecond Edition
- Ship Resistance and Propulsion
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Preface to the Second Edition
- Preface to the First Edition
- Nomenclature
- Abbreviations
- Figure Acknowledgements
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Propulsive Power
- 3 Components of Hull Resistance
- 4 Model–Ship Extrapolation
- 5 Model–Ship Correlation
- 6 Restricted Water Depth and Breadth
- 7 Measurement of Resistance Components
- 8 Wake and Thrust Deduction
- 9 Numerical Estimation of Ship Resistance
- 10 Resistance Design Data
- 11 Propulsor Types
- 12 Propeller Characteristics
- 13 Powering Process
- 14 Hull Form Design
- 15 Numerical Methods for Propeller Analysis
- 16 Propulsor Design Data
- 17 Reductions in Propulsive Power and Emissions
- 18 Applications
- Book part
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Ship Resistance and PropulsionPractical Estimation of Ship Propulsive Power, pp. 264 - 276Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
References (Chapter 11)
Carlton, J.S. Marine Propellers and Propulsion. 2nd Edition. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, UK, 2007.Google Scholar
Andersen, P. Tip modified propellers. Ocean Engineering International, Vol. 3, No. 1, 1999.Google Scholar
Dang, J. Improving cavitation performance with new blade sections for marine propellers. International Shipbuilding Progress, Vol. 51, 2004.Google Scholar
Dyne, G. On the principles of propellers with endplates. Transactions of the Royal Institution of Naval Architects, Vol. 147, 2005, pp. 213–223.Google Scholar
Baker, G.S. The effect of propeller boss diameter upon thrust and efficiency at given revolutions. Transactions of the Royal Institution of Naval Architects, Vol. 94, 1952, pp. 92–109.Google Scholar
Renilson, M. Submarine Hydrodynamics. Springer Science and Business Media, London, 2015.Google Scholar
Suryanarayana, Ch., Rao, M.N., Satyanarayana, B. and Ramji, K. Evaluation of cavitation performance of an axi-symmetric body with pump jet propulsor. Transactions of the Royal Institution of Naval Architects, Vol. 152, 2010, pp. A-135–A-145.Google Scholar
Abu-Sharkh, S.M., Turnock, S.R. and Draper, G. Performance of tip-driven electric thrusters for unmanned underwater vehicles. Proceedings of the Eleventh International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, Stavanger, Norway, June 2001, pp. 321–324.Google Scholar
Abu-Sharkh, S.M., Turnock, S.R. and Hughes, A.W. Design and performance of an electric tip-driven thruster. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part M: Journal of Engineering for the Maritime Environment, Vol. 217, No. 3, 2003.Google Scholar
Yakovlev, A.Y., Sokolov, M.A. and Marinich, N.V. Numerical design and experimental verification of a rim-driven thruster. Second International Symposium on Marine Propulsors, SMP’11, Hamburg, Germany, June 2011, pp. 396–402.Google Scholar
Hughes, A.W., Turnock, S.R. and Abu-Sharkh, S.M. Use of an electromagnetic rim-driven propulsor for waterjet propulsion systems. Transactions of the Royal Institution of Naval Architects, Vol. 145, 2003, pp. 41–52.Google Scholar
Glover, E.J. Contra rotating propellers for high speed cargo vessels. A theoretical design study. Transactions North East Coast Institution of Engineers and Shipbuilders, Vol. 83, 1966–1967, pp. 75–89.Google Scholar
Van Manen, J.D. and Oosterveld, M.W.C. Model tests on contra-rotating propellers. International Shipbuilding Progress, Vol. 15, No. 172, 1968, pp. 401–417.Google Scholar
Meier-Peter, H. Engineering aspects of contra-rotating propulsion systems for seagoing merchant ships. International Shipbuilding Progress, Vol. 20, No. 221, 1973.Google Scholar
Praefke, E., Richards, J. and Engelskirchen, J. Counter rotating propellers without complex shafting for a fast monohull ferry. Proceedings of Sixth International Conference on Fast Sea Transportation, FAST’2001, Southampton, UK, 2001.Google Scholar
Kim, S.E., Choi, S.H. and Veikonheimo, T. Model tests on propulsion systems for ultra large container vessels. Proceedings of the International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, ISOPE-2002, Kitakyushu, Japan, 2002.Google Scholar
Sánchez-Caja, A., Pérez-Sobrino, M., Quereda, R., Nijland, M., Veikonheimo, T., González-Adalid, J., Saisto, I. and Auriarte, A. Combination of a Pod, CLT and CRP propulsion for improving ship efficiency: the TRIPOD project. Proceedings of Third International Symposium on Marine Propulsors, SMP’13, Launceston, Tasmania, Australia, 2013, pp. 347–357.Google Scholar
Qin, S. and Yunde, G. Tandem propellers for high powered ships. Transactions of the Royal Institution of Naval Architects, Vol. 133, 1991, pp. 347–362.Google Scholar
Telfer, E.V. Sir Charles Parsons and the naval architect. Transactions of the Royal Institution of Naval Architects, Vol. 108, 1966, pp. 1–18.Google Scholar
Claughton, A., Wellicome, J.F. and Shenoi, R.A. (eds.) Sailing Yacht Design, Vol. 1 Theory, Vol. 2 Practice. The University of Southampton, Southampton, UK, 2006.Google Scholar
RINA. Proceedings of the Symposium on Wind Propulsion of Commercial Ships. The Royal Institution of Naval Architects, London, 1980.Google Scholar
Murata, M., Tsuji, M. and Watanabe, T. Aerodynamic characteristics of a 1600 Dwt sail-assisted tanker. Transactions North East Coast Institution of Engineers and Shipbuilders, Vol. 98, No. 3, 1982, pp. 75–90.Google Scholar
Alexander, F.H. The propulsive efficiency of rowing. Transactions of the Royal Institution of Naval Architects, Vol. 69, 1927, pp. 228–244.Google Scholar
Wellicome, J.F. Some hydrodynamic aspects of rowing. In Rowing – A Scientific Approach, ed. Williams, J.P.G and Scott, A.C. Barnes, A.S, New York, 1967.Google Scholar
Shaw, J.T. Rowing in ships and boats. Transactions of the Royal Institution of Naval Architects, Vol. 135, 1993, pp. 211–224.Google Scholar
Kleshnev, V. Propulsive efficiency of rowing. Proceedings of XVII International Symposium on Biomechanics in Sports, Perth, Australia, 1999, pp. 224–228.Google Scholar
Molland, A.F. (ed.) The Maritime Engineering Reference Book. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, UK, 2008.Google Scholar
Mor, M. and Gany, A. Performance mapping of a bubbly water ramjet. Technical Note. International Journal of Maritime Engineering, Transactions of the Royal Institution of Naval Architects, Vol. 149, 2007, pp. 45–50.Google Scholar
Bar-Cohen, Y. Bio-mimetics – using nature to inspire human innovation. Bioinspiration and Biomimetics, Vol. 1, No. 1, 2006, pp. 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gawn, R.W.L. Fish propulsion in relation to ship design. Transactions of the Royal Institution of Naval Architects, Vol. 92, 1950, pp. 323–332.Google Scholar
Streitlien, K., Triantafyllou, G.S. and Triantafyllou, M.S. Efficient foil propulsion through vortex control. AIAA Journal, Vol. 34, 1996, pp. 2315–2319.Google Scholar
Long, J.H., Schumacher, L., Livingston, N. and Kemp, M. Four flippers or two? Tetrapodal swimming with an aquatic robot. Bioinspiration and Biomimetics, Vol. 1, No. 1, 2006, pp. 20–29.Google Scholar
Bose, N. Marine Powering Prediction and Propulsors. The Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers, New York, 2008.Google Scholar
Fish, F.E. The myth and reality of Gray's paradox: implication of dolphin drag reduction for technology. Bioinspiration and Biomimetics, Vol. 1, No. 2, 2006, pp. 17–25.Google Scholar
Anderson, E.J., Techet, A., McGillis, W.R., Grosenbaugh, M.A. and Triantafyllou, M.S. Visualisation and analysis of boundary layer flow in live and robotic fish. First Symposium on Turbulence and Shear Flow Phenomena, Santa Barbara, CA, 1999, pp. 945–949.Google Scholar
Fish, F.E. and Rohr, J.J. Review of dolphin hydrodynamics and swimming performance. Technical Report 1801, SPAWAR Systems Center, San Diego, CA, 1999.Google Scholar
Triantafyllou, M.S., Triantafyllou, G.S. and Yue, D.K.P. Hydrodynamics of fish like swimming. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, Vol. 32, 2000, pp. 33–54.Google Scholar
Lang, T.G. Hydrodynamic Analysis of Cetacean Performance: Whales, Dolphins and Porpoises. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA, 1966.Google Scholar